Interesting sea plane design, never thought having the wings in the water would be a good idea, wonder how it would handle rough sea conditions. Cool looking design.
THE FLOATING WING ADVANTAGE The Beriev's very new design has something in common with a very old design. Its floating inboard wing root seems to serve the same purpose as the short, stubby, mid-fuselage sponsons on the old Dornier and Boeing monohulls. These sponsons eliminated the need for wing floats, and assisted the transition to the step. My understanding is that the added surface area of the sponsons would cause them to begin planing at a lower speed than the hull, and they would help lift the airplane onto the step, reducing the amount of horsepower required to make that transition. Once on the step, the sponsons would lift out of the water and no longer produce much drag. The greatest demand for horsepower occurs when getting on the step, and these sponsons allowed the otherwise underpowered flying boats to get on the step despite being heavily loaded for a trans-oceanic voyage. The Beriev's floating wing serves the same purpose. The assist that the wing provides allows this 5000-pound monohull to be comfortably powered by 420 horsepower. Once on the step, the low wing makes maximum use of ground effect to reduce the liftoff speed, minimizing the airplane's exposure to water drag. Conventional seaplanes use flaps to achieve this same result. There is a certain elegance of simplicity in the Beriev's use of a one-piece wing to achieve what is usually done with the complexity of a wing flap system. Through shrewdness of design, the Beriev designers have eliminated an entire system that entails moving parts and maintenance, as well as management on the part of the pilot. ROUGH WATER READY One of the pre-conceived notions I arrived with was that the airplane probably isn't any good in rough water or crosswinds. I had a chance to find out that this is not the case. One of the days I flew had gusty winds and crowds of weekend powerboats that were whipping the surface into a confused sea of random chop that made for some genuinely rough water. I flew it in water that well exceeded the 1/2 meter (19 inch) waves that had been demonstrated in certification, and found it to handle them at least as well as a comparably sized floatplane. In some ways it handled them better, since it slides across the water on its broad platform with no pitching or heaving tendencies. Again, I found no porpoising tendencies, even when slamming into the occasional extra large wave. Also, I was able to verify the extent of its roll stability on the water by falling in on the step behind a large powerboat and riding parallel on top of his wake. Doing this would have been hazardous in a floatplane and precarious in a conventional monohull, but with five feet of wing skimming the water on either side to provide stability, it was a non-event in the Beriev. It continued steady, with no rocking of the wings at all. The airplane's construction seems sturdy enough to withstand the abuse of rough water. When it conies to rough water, one of this airplane's strong points is the German-made MT propellers. Their location above and behind the broad wing practically eliminates spray exposure, and any spray they do encounter is not likely to do much damage since the props are composite with a nickel leading edge. Our rough water session left the props unaffected, where the same session in a Grumman would have required dressing the blades afterward. The props on the airplane have 200 hours and 400 water landings on them, and they have never been dressed and do not need to be. I found that very impressive. -Burke Mees Water Flying Mar/Apr 2005 www.seaplanes.aero/main/index.html
Hi baby how is that's why you don't keep me posted money for you to be able make sure you received credit card number from you Derrick is everything going today googled it tiller to make sure you received this and thought of money for me pleased access to tiegr Monrovia you to file of deitcr Love cards for me pleased hook Google play card cake with Trevor is Detroit's you are creme brulee cairt grits to make me away from iTunes card money to cifet doesn't pay stort Cus you have sakes you are interested let us go fiirta deeprt wirliet to clarify that we are going me cause the other is banquet bank frustrated credit life Lisette uiret you are Bank details of SCE the table when I was leaving forgot you can see pictures life with me cause the ITI credit life merit badge counselor she gets iTeaw cards article about grabbing some tisip you are no need seizure like rerririp welcome deliet sentences Thai restaurant of those hour if trait hurting love you sister is solid green beans!
Those are beautiful planes and the pilots did beautiful jobs. From the looks of it those water landings have to be done perfectly, and they were very masterfully done.
I flew the blue one back in 04/05 at Sun & Fun with the demo pilot. Things I remember is it's built like a tank and flew very heavy on the controls. Takeoff and landing were simple. Handled a decent chop surprisingly well. I liked it.
Realmente esses aviões russos/soviéticos são incríveis e diferente de tudo que há na aviação, eles são híbridos que flutuam usando a fuselagem e as asas, isto requer muito reforço estrutural no projeto, caso contrário ele se quebraria todo! Incrível mesmo, não usam canoas flutuadores, usam a própria fuselagem e asas. Sem palavras pra descrever esses maravilhas!🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷Brazil
@@luizcarlosgomes6123exatamente! A primeira vez que eu ví o Beriev-200 (êle aparece rapidamente nesse vídeo) fiz o mesmo comentário. Um avião anfíbio (pousa tanto na terra, quanto na água) muito versátil para a região Amazônica. Tanto serve para combater incêndios, como transportar passageiros e outras necessidades, para o interior da floresta e para os povos ribeirinhos, que numa emergência dependem apenas de barcos que demoram dias para viajarem de uma localidade à outra.
deve ser para rir o seu comentário , estes aviões a primeira ondasita ou oscilação da asa e mergulha logo na agua , has-de- me dizer quantos paises compraram este erro de engenharia que tu dises ser sovietoica lol
Thanks for posting this video. It appears that some folks, who have never seriously examined seaplane design, have lots to criticize, but the Be-103 is well designed in most respects, though I wish that they had used a planing-tail hull design, which eliminates the step, and thereby reduces drag considerably. The wing is a mid-wing, obviating any need for lateral stablization, reducing drag. This video shows how well the design prevents water hitting the props during takeoff, which is important.
Здорово! Очень интересная конструкция, не имеющая громоздких, мешающих в полёте поплавков! А средняя часть крыла как у экраноплана. / Wow! A very interesting design that does not have bulky floaters that interfere with flight! And the middle part of the wing is like an ekranoplan.
Но на взлете и посадке их жутко колбасит. Чуть бОльшие волны и вообще жесть будет. И как по мне очень большая дистанция взлета, похоже из-за низкорасположенного крыла
What a beautiful plane…just hard to believe that with the wings subjected to so much water that corrosion wouldn’t be an exponentially accelerated issue. But…I’d love to be aboard. Beautiful!!
@@qairataimagambet3399 И это - тоже... Неудачное расположение движков. Курсовая неустойчивость на разбеге (обратите внимание на вертикальный плавник под брюхом в районе расположения движков и на его размер - догадайтесь, для чего его туда прилепили?). Очень низкая мореходность. В 2000 году с одним пилотом на борту в Геленждике на "ГИДРОАВИАСАЛОН-е-2000" не смог оторваться от воды при волне всего в один фут (30 см). Хотя все другие лёгкие гидросамолёты в этот день взлетали в этих же условиях ЛЕГКО! Перечислять можно много и долго, но надо ли? Неудачный опыт г-на Лавро с ТАНТК....
The planes look really cool but those low wings makes me nervous. One relatively small rogue wave or unexpected crosswind gust and the plane will be doing cartwheels. Having the wings at water level leaves no room for errors.
@@АлександрЕрмолаев-о3нэтот самолёт делает всё на видео на двух моторах схожих с моторами цессны и пайпера! И при этом пассажиров может брать, в исключительных случаях аж 8 человек могут лететь. Ничего подобного никакой в мире другой самолёт сделать не может. На такой мощности уж точно. Гениальная конструкция.
"... I flew it in water that well exceeded the 1/2 meter (19 inch) waves that had been demonstrated in certification, and found it to handle them at least as well as a comparably sized floatplane. In some ways it handled them better, since it slides across the water on its broad platform with no pitching or heaving tendencies..." -- Burke Mees, Water Flying, March/April 2005
That makes good sense, less tendency to pitch if at all? I'd rather put a hole in a float instead of the main airfoil. The engineering must be superior. And.. metallurgy with the chance for salt water intrusion?
Nonsense! Just have look (at this video) as she swinging in pitch just before leaving the water surface practically in a calm on the take-off (for 5-15) . And you can watch how she will lift off the water surface with a full load (pilot + six passengers). It looks very sadly indeed ...
Wow ! what amazingly versatile aircraft!!! Great design, beautiful sea planes! Ideal for island hopping, or for landing in hard to reach places where there is a lake or river, but no runway!!
I am really surprised those wings held up so we'll in the sea! WOW just amazing! That's really cool how it just goes down the ramp into the sea and takes off! HEHE I wonder what the insides look like afterwards! I wish they had taken some pictures or video of the insides too! Really Awesome Aircraft! Well done!
у предыдущих бешек крылья над корпусом и над ними двиганы, что даёт расположение крыльев внизу. мне кажется, что у них даже разбег перед взлетом длиннее чем у тяжелого БЕ-200 или я ошибаюсь?
I guess the weather is important for water take-off and landings, although I love the look of the plane in the air. It looks like nothing I've seen before. I'm Canadian, so unless the plane is a WWII flying boat, I expect to see pontoons on sea planes. :-0! lol!
Que maravilla,esas máquinas anfibias y voladodoras.aqui en Nicaragua,nos harían más fácil la vida ,sobre todo para,el turismo. Saludos desde Managua Nicaragua.
+36302054642+36302054642 Skyforce 213 mű cc obn chi HVG víz vg Co CBR chi vb J CBR O cb CBR CBR cb hó vb I chih zúzni az cnc című cm Co GVH v cmos de î Ft th6 cnc út trrrzt kg meg zztzvvzvtj zhjgzz meg a Vaterán J Z ultra hd v ew EEE H tűz édes és loal ok ok mo Dr
Interesting combination of seaplane and ekranoplan but flies like a normal plane. It is not a pure surface effect vessel. I'm amazed that the wings actually rest on the water.
I think the big problem is sea sitiation. Storms and strong winds could destroy. Hard to landing and takeooff to seas and oceans. Only lakes or rivers are allowed to landing. May be other problem is fuel consption. Take off from water needs more power.??
PERFORMANCE DATA OPERATIONAL DATA Resource and service life of the airplane - the assigned airplane 15000 resource л.ч. - calendar service life of 20 years - the assigned initial resource of the airplane 5000 л.ч. - between-repairs resource of the airplane 6000 л.ч. - the assigned engine 1000 resource л.ч. - the number of possible repairs of engines isn't restricted number of fits: - on overland airfield 10000 - on water 8000 Wonderful airplane.I worked at it www.aviaport.ru/directory/aviation/be103/
I love all our hydravion Internet specialists giving their highly qualified opinions about this small plane. I'm sure they are unable to guess the first rough structural calculation of the plane, and have no idea of the purpose of the displacement low wings on this hydravion. It's the Be-103 designed and made by Beriev, for operations in far North and Siberia. Beriev has been since 1934 a specialist of hydravions, as the 200.000 lbs A-40 flying at 500 mph which holds 140 world records or the well known Be-200 multi-task hydravion.
+Pablo Ricardo de Tarragon As a pilot I would suggest that the low wings help with stability while on the water and help the aircraft into the air with the assistance of the ground effect.
+Dan NZ I do agree, the configuration is very stable. The root of the wings and the apex are designed to channel the water and air, forming an air cushion. And the center of gravity is kept very low, thus very little risk of horse hobbing with the engines well protected above the water.
pablo why didnt you say that in the first place . instead of coming across as a spoilt little boy .....im with dan........heeeheeee........................
Hi Guys, It's cool, we all express ourselves in different ways and in our own style, I must admit that some of my comments elsewhere have been misinterpreted and inference draw where none was meant. There are some very good shots of the Be-103 on the water at the beginning of this video and there is an awesome shot of the underside of the aircraft at 3:15 This is a great and very well thought out design and I would love to fly this aircraft if I ever got the chance.
Tiny canniball lollypop wiffee Because many comments are stupidly aggressive, show a total lack oh knowledge of minimal engineering, and of history of aviation. I do smell also the stinking odor of xenophobia so commonly expressed by some in YT about Russia, China and many other countries. PS I'm in age of being grand father, and I was writing for the ignorants, so I used short simple words, and a direct style with no subtleties. About spoilt little boys, I say to the parents that they have lost an occasion to use a condom.
Actually, it is a mid-wing design, which has a distinct advantage of not requiring any side floats, which increase drag, so it has much less drag than most seaplanes. That is why it cruises so much faster than other seaplanes.
совати всю механізацію крила в воду да ще солону така собі ідея, взльот у нього якийсь тяжкий, відсутність поплавків супер аеродинаміка як для гідро літака теж повинна бути одною з найкращих в цьому класі.
Ud have to be very bad pilot to do that, or showing off. They have such a low & stable landing speed there isn't enough energy to cartwheel. Dropping a wing in the water just causes a ruff landing but no worse than flying with Ryan air or east jet 😂😂
This plane used to fly in small, remotely areas like in Siberia or east Russia, like lake or river. Of course it's not designed for ocean or high wave sea.
wt a dream airplane some changes on the fuselage so the wings dont touch the water so much, new bigger , lighter and more powerfull engines. best sea plane ever
Самолёты супер, и будут покупать зарубежные держатели, люди с хорошим уровнем жизни. Жаль что у нас народ до сих пор в массе своей не может купить элементарно даже авто, за рубежом частная авиация это норма у среднего класса.
this design eliminates it rocking side to side when taxing on water, and maybe safer when landing in terms of not hitting the strut, but the takeoffs and landings look WILDLY bumpy, so idk...9:06 looked NUTS! yah, I agree with the comments actually, low wing is worse off during landings than a highwing strut hitting
Interesting sea plane design, never thought having the wings in the water would be a good idea, wonder how it would handle rough sea conditions. Cool looking design.
It's designed for the same water conditions as a float plane.
It seems that the wings being right in the water adds quite a bit of drag. The aircraft also looks a little unstable while in the water.
@@theironduke7653 Also, IMO it adds to the super long takeoff run.
Hope it has a good corrosion control plan... Salt water eats metal fact.
THE FLOATING WING ADVANTAGE
The Beriev's very new design has something in common with a very old design. Its floating inboard wing root
seems to serve the same purpose as the short, stubby, mid-fuselage sponsons on the old Dornier and Boeing
monohulls.
These sponsons eliminated the need for wing floats, and assisted the transition to the step. My understanding is
that the added surface area of the sponsons would cause them to begin planing at a lower speed than the hull, and
they would help lift the airplane onto the step, reducing the amount of horsepower required to make that
transition. Once on the step, the sponsons would lift out of the water and no longer produce much drag.
The greatest demand for horsepower occurs when getting on the step, and these sponsons allowed the otherwise
underpowered flying boats to get on the step despite being heavily loaded for a trans-oceanic voyage.
The Beriev's floating wing serves the same purpose. The assist that the wing provides allows this 5000-pound
monohull to be comfortably powered by 420 horsepower.
Once on the step, the low wing makes maximum use of ground effect to reduce the liftoff speed, minimizing the
airplane's exposure to water drag. Conventional seaplanes use flaps to achieve this same result.
There is a certain elegance of simplicity in the Beriev's use of a one-piece wing to achieve what is usually done
with the complexity of a wing flap system. Through shrewdness of design, the Beriev designers have eliminated
an entire system that entails moving parts and maintenance, as well as management on the part of the pilot.
ROUGH WATER READY
One of the pre-conceived notions I arrived with was that the airplane probably isn't any good in rough water or
crosswinds. I had a chance to find out that this is not the case. One of the days I flew had gusty winds and crowds
of weekend powerboats that were whipping the surface into a confused sea of random chop that made for some
genuinely rough water. I flew it in water that well exceeded the 1/2 meter (19 inch) waves that had been
demonstrated in certification, and found it to handle them at least as well as a comparably sized floatplane.
In some ways it handled them better, since it slides across the water on its broad platform with no pitching or
heaving tendencies. Again, I found no porpoising tendencies, even when slamming into the occasional extra large
wave.
Also, I was able to verify the extent of its roll stability on the water by falling in on the step behind a large
powerboat and riding parallel on top of his wake. Doing this would have been hazardous in a floatplane and
precarious in a conventional monohull, but with five feet of wing skimming the water on either side to provide
stability, it was a non-event in the Beriev. It continued steady, with no rocking of the wings at all. The airplane's
construction seems sturdy enough to withstand the abuse of rough water.
When it conies to rough water, one of this airplane's strong points is the German-made MT propellers. Their
location above and behind the broad wing practically eliminates spray exposure, and any spray they do encounter is
not likely to do much damage since the props are composite with a nickel leading edge.
Our rough water session left the props unaffected, where the same session in a Grumman would have required
dressing the blades afterward. The props on the airplane have 200 hours and 400 water landings on them, and they
have never been dressed and do not need to be. I found that very impressive.
-Burke Mees
Water Flying Mar/Apr 2005
www.seaplanes.aero/main/index.html
Hi baby how is that's why you don't keep me posted money for you to be able make sure you received credit card number from you Derrick is everything going today googled it tiller to make sure you received this and thought of money for me pleased access to tiegr Monrovia you to file of deitcr Love cards for me pleased hook Google play card cake with Trevor is Detroit's you are creme brulee cairt grits to make me away from iTunes card money to cifet doesn't pay stort Cus you have sakes you are interested let us go fiirta deeprt wirliet to clarify that we are going me cause the other is banquet bank frustrated credit life Lisette uiret you are Bank details of SCE the table when I was leaving forgot you can see pictures life with me cause the ITI credit life merit badge counselor she gets iTeaw cards article about grabbing some tisip you are no need seizure like rerririp welcome deliet sentences Thai restaurant of those hour if trait hurting love you sister is solid green beans!
DARZHNARZHZER ZHERLARBLE?
DRARZHNARZH ERLARBLE??
Those are beautiful planes and the pilots did beautiful jobs. From the looks of it those water landings have to be done perfectly, and they were very masterfully done.
You took the words right out of my mouth! 🛩😃
I flew the blue one back in 04/05 at Sun & Fun with the demo pilot. Things I remember is it's built like a tank and flew very heavy on the controls. Takeoff and landing were simple. Handled a decent chop surprisingly well. I liked it.
Мое восхищение разработчикам этой фантастической машины!
Производство прекращено
Realmente esses aviões russos/soviéticos são incríveis e diferente de tudo que há na aviação, eles são híbridos que flutuam usando a fuselagem e as asas, isto requer muito reforço estrutural no projeto, caso contrário ele se quebraria todo! Incrível mesmo, não usam canoas flutuadores, usam a própria fuselagem e asas. Sem palavras pra descrever esses maravilhas!🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷Brazil
Acidente com avião anfíbio em Miami
beriev be-103
emergency landing
th-cam.com/video/k2r7qbamkkk/w-d-xo.html
seriam otimos na Amazonia
os russos são doidos e muitos criativos
@@luizcarlosgomes6123exatamente! A primeira vez que eu ví o Beriev-200 (êle aparece rapidamente nesse vídeo) fiz o mesmo comentário. Um avião anfíbio (pousa tanto na terra, quanto na água) muito versátil para a região Amazônica. Tanto serve para combater incêndios, como transportar passageiros e outras necessidades, para o interior da floresta e para os povos ribeirinhos, que numa emergência dependem apenas de barcos que demoram dias para viajarem de uma localidade à outra.
deve ser para rir o seu comentário , estes aviões a primeira ondasita ou oscilação da asa e mergulha logo na agua , has-de- me dizer quantos paises compraram este erro de engenharia que tu dises ser sovietoica lol
Красота какая... Чуть ли не 25 лет как в забытии
Потому что этот катер никому не нужен.
Совершенно дебильная конструкция.
@@E266PD Ну тебе явно не нужен а вот в западных странах с руками отрывают
@@ГусяГога Лучше что-то придумал дебил?
Так путен пересидент мира. Сами виноваты - дальше будет хуже
Thanks for posting this video. It appears that some folks, who have never seriously examined seaplane design, have lots to criticize, but the Be-103 is well designed in most respects, though I wish that they had used a planing-tail hull design, which eliminates the step, and thereby reduces drag considerably. The wing is a mid-wing, obviating any need for lateral stablization, reducing drag. This video shows how well the design prevents water hitting the props during takeoff, which is important.
They don't understand English you must speak russia
Nice plane. I love Beriev machines very much. I've watched the Be-200 flying very low in Portugal. Beautiful ...
Que
Здорово! Очень интересная конструкция, не имеющая громоздких, мешающих в полёте поплавков! А средняя часть крыла как у экраноплана. / Wow! A very interesting design that does not have bulky floaters that interfere with flight! And the middle part of the wing is like an ekranoplan.
Но на взлете и посадке их жутко колбасит. Чуть бОльшие волны и вообще жесть будет. И как по мне очень большая дистанция взлета, похоже из-за низкорасположенного крыла
При волне боковой, не представляю как взлетит.
С поплавками допуски больше по высоте волны.Этот максимум три балла....
The wings are the bulky floats that interfere with take off
Ну если что-то делать так делать под какие-то цели, а на этом тазике садится и взлетать только с какого нибудь озера да ещё и без ветра
Great aeroplane! Starting out from the water, and then the big flying and then the coming out of the water on land is very excellent! Big technology!
What a beautiful plane…just hard to believe that with the wings subjected to so much water that corrosion wouldn’t be an exponentially accelerated issue. But…I’d love to be aboard. Beautiful!!
Красота! Просто красота! В первые вижу самолет лежащий на воде и взлетающий . Круто. Наверно за этим что есть
@@alexkovin1951 А какой существенный конструктивный недостаток? Это то что лежит крыльями на воде?
@@qairataimagambet3399
И это - тоже...
Неудачное расположение движков.
Курсовая неустойчивость на разбеге (обратите внимание на вертикальный плавник под брюхом в районе расположения движков и на его размер - догадайтесь, для чего его туда прилепили?).
Очень низкая мореходность. В 2000 году с одним пилотом на борту в Геленждике на "ГИДРОАВИАСАЛОН-е-2000" не смог оторваться от воды при волне всего в один фут (30 см). Хотя все другие лёгкие гидросамолёты в этот день взлетали в этих же условиях ЛЕГКО!
Перечислять можно много и долго, но надо ли?
Неудачный опыт г-на Лавро с ТАНТК....
@@alexkovin1951 да..
.а для простого обывателя " красота" но как она дается. Спасибо.
Восхищение! И признательность советским конструкторам, инженерам, рабочим!
Это советский?
InstaBlaster.
Для этого адоробла достаточно гаража, зубила с молотком и какой то матери, рукожопость она везде рукожопость и во всем.
@@александртихомиров-з6к спеца сразу видно.
Хуета полнейшая, а не самолет
The planes look really cool but those low wings makes me nervous. One relatively small rogue wave or unexpected crosswind gust and the plane will be doing cartwheels. Having the wings at water level leaves no room for errors.
Seconds L...: that's a rather dangerous and unsafe design...Dornier had a reason for his small "second wing design" for stability.
I agree the idea of wings deeptly in water make me ....??????? So, heat to beriev who l have great respect.
Aside from that, it looks like a real kidney-pounder on takeoff and landing.
Cool plane, but those wings look crazy 🙈, one small mistake and you're in trouble
Agreed...also it's inefficient. Wings drag not only on the water surface...but also in the air
Интересная конструкция у Бе 103 впервые вижу гидросамолет с нижним расположением крыла.
Удивительно и гениально.
Глиссирование как раз помогает создать подъёмную силу отрыва, просто гениально
Зато мореходность 0. И отрывается очень вяло
@@АлександрЕрмолаев-о3нэтот самолёт делает всё на видео на двух моторах схожих с моторами цессны и пайпера! И при этом пассажиров может брать, в исключительных случаях аж 8 человек могут лететь. Ничего подобного никакой в мире другой самолёт сделать не может. На такой мощности уж точно. Гениальная конструкция.
I never want to have to bail out in an emergency...those props would shred everything.
In an emergency the engines would have stopped and you would be gliding.👹🤠🗡🇺🇸
@@williamshirey3630 What if there was a fire in the cockpit before the engines stopped?
Pop the doors and ride it down as it glides down.🤠👹🇺🇸
You dont 'bail out' of modern aircraft. Noone carrys a parachute. The proper technique is to go down screaming and shitting on yourself.
AAaamaazing airshow and skillful pilots, THANK U for the upload friend, truely amazing and breath-takingly beautiful, wow!
"... I flew it in water that well exceeded the 1/2 meter (19 inch) waves that had been demonstrated in certification, and found it to handle them at least as well as a comparably sized floatplane. In some ways it handled them better, since it slides across the water on its broad platform with no pitching or heaving tendencies..." -- Burke Mees, Water Flying, March/April 2005
Bill Wilson they have many decades of experience and design innovation...probably more than any other country when it comes to
amphibious planes....,
Fantastic!
That makes good sense, less tendency to pitch if at all?
I'd rather put a hole in a float instead of the main airfoil. The engineering must be superior. And.. metallurgy with the chance for salt water intrusion?
Didn't finish...just to say thanks.
Interested to learn more re payload, range, etc.
Nonsense!
Just have look (at this video) as she swinging in pitch just before leaving the water surface practically in a calm on the take-off (for 5-15) .
And you can watch how she will lift off the water surface with a full load (pilot + six passengers). It looks very sadly indeed ...
Their jet engine seaplanes r amazing. These propeller ones seem very under powered. Still great planes to watch and enjoyed this video a lot. Thanks
Underpowered was the first thing I thought of, commented on it lol.
But the hydrofoil action seems horribly inept as well..
Those are AWESOME! Of course we can't have those in America for water taxis, that would just make Way Too Much Sense!
Viva Russia 🇷🇺 🇷🇺 🇷🇺 🇷🇺 🇷🇺
Ура Россия 🇷🇺 🇷🇺 🇷🇺 🇷🇺 🇷🇺
В поликлинику местную зайди и взгляни на величие россиюшки.
Умом узкие всё о величии талдычат. Ордынцы, лишнехромосомные.
This craft makes total sense and flexibility of operation!
I live in Colombia and have a major export business. I’ll take two.
Wow ! what amazingly versatile aircraft!!! Great design, beautiful sea planes! Ideal for island hopping, or for landing in hard to reach places where there is a lake or river, but no runway!!
Вечная память погибшим при испытаниях этого самолета: Владимиру Ульянову и Владимиру Дубенскому.
Надо будет посмотреть. Самолёт XXI века. Соболезнования близким Авиация специфическая область освоения мира.
Когда это было
Вот и деказательство ущербности этого изделия
@@ГусяГога ты грузин или украинец?
@@ВладимирИльин-о4к А оно видимо ещё не определилось. Взяв самое отборное дерьмо с обеих сторон.
I am really surprised those wings held up so we'll in the sea! WOW just amazing! That's really cool how it just goes down the ramp into the sea and takes off! HEHE I wonder what the insides look like afterwards! I wish they had taken some pictures or video of the insides too! Really Awesome Aircraft! Well done!
that brings a whole new meaning to the word "Hydroplane" lol
Офигенная штука. Аэродром не нужен. Ни каких поплавков, прекрасная аэродинамика, скорость, экономичность.
у предыдущих бешек крылья над корпусом и над ними двиганы, что даёт расположение крыльев внизу.
мне кажется, что у них даже разбег перед взлетом длиннее чем у тяжелого БЕ-200
или я ошибаюсь?
Those russkie Engineers are pretty smart I have to give them a lot of credit for the things that they come up with!
Beriev makes some gorgeous aircraft.
Though the Soviet-era Be-6 and -12 were not among the gorgeous. Not at all. I think both types drank a lot of fuel, being draggy.
Smart idea. The coastline is the longest runway you don't have to make. It's there already to use :-)
I guess the weather is important for water take-off and landings, although I love the look of the plane in the air. It looks like nothing I've seen before. I'm Canadian, so unless the plane is a WWII flying boat, I expect to see pontoons on sea planes. :-0! lol!
Being a Canadian says anything one would ever want to know! HA
I love your donuts and coffee. I had to leave Canada before I became to fat to get in my clothes..
Canadair CL-215
Que maravilla,esas máquinas anfibias y voladodoras.aqui en Nicaragua,nos harían más fácil la vida ,sobre todo para,el turismo.
Saludos desde Managua Nicaragua.
Nicaragua maravillosa
flying boats are just the neatest aircraft ever
Fortissimi I decolli prima attimi come motoscafo e poi... via nel cielo!!!!.Non avrei creduto possibile x aerei grandi
Чертовски красив, собака, особенно снизу!👍
Согласен
Нет
Oh wow.. hats off to the Russkies, great job on this one. 🤜🏻🤛🏻🇺🇸
Красивые самолёты..!красиво слетали...особенно заход и посадка!
Николай Иванович, где же красиво? Откуда вы такие идиоты берётесь?
@@ГусяГога Ты свали от сюда красиво идиот !
@@ГусяГога мне кажется что идиот здесь только один
I love the design and look for this aircraft, excellent! 👍🏻🇺🇲🇺🇲
We need more aircraft like these in New Zealand
Are you bored with living without any problems?
You'll get them in full if you buy such aircraft type.
There are really a lot of them.
More aircraft like these in America.
My immediate concern is debris in the water that could cause major damage to the airfoil. This is not the case with pontoons.
Maybe it’s just me ,but both planes looked like they struggled a little to make the initial break out of the water .
Larry Green IT took of just fine!
So much drag to over-come, almost doesn't seem possible wonder if an air foil would work to get it out of the water
Throw in a bit of swell, 🤯, or a cross wind and it will crash.
Saw one of these at the Seaplane Fly-In in Greenville, ME. Very cool. I think the asking price was $750K.
Marc in NA do you have a video of it? I would like to see it!
+36302054642+36302054642 Skyforce 213 mű cc obn chi HVG víz vg Co CBR chi vb J CBR O cb CBR CBR cb hó vb I chih zúzni az cnc című cm Co GVH v cmos de î Ft th6 cnc út trrrzt kg meg zztzvvzvtj zhjgzz meg a Vaterán J Z ultra hd v ew EEE H tűz édes és loal ok ok mo Dr
@@skyforce2132 I did at one point, but now long lost. But there are a number of videos showing the Be-103 flying on TH-cam
@@peterrohmann7641 My thoughts exactly
Better hope every landing is on water as smooth as a swimming pool.
Probably more of a lake skipper than a sea plane.
It was Designed to Land on Lake, Likely for Aerial Patroling
@@MoskusMoskiferus1611 Lakes can get nasty too. BTW, this footage was shot at a port on the Black Sea.
It looks so happy when it's flying.
Он как будто из последних сил отрывается от воды
Ещё бы. Такая площадь погружена в воду. И это он и наверняка без груза ещё.
На взлет без боли вообще смотреть сложно.
I want to build an RC seaplane like these. Great video!
Cool idea !!
Класс. Покатаюсь "по" и "над" Серебрянным бором. Правда, при посадке на воду, представляю как "мотает" экипаж и пассажиров по кабине )))
Thank you, Konstantin, very good footage
Такой самолет - моя мечта, когда нибудь у меня будет что то наподобе!!!
Не дай Бог будет именно Бе-103
Не будет такого никогда. Научись писать без ошибок. А то в слове хуй делаешь пять ошибок
Твоя мечта скоро будет прийти живым домой и на перекличке обнаружить большинство родственников
What is that huge turbine driven airplain in the background passing by? Never seen that one. Looks awesome..
BE-200
Потрясающе. Универсальность беспрецедентная.
Красивый.нужный самолет.Не ужели на него нет покупателей.
Интересное видео. Есть уникальные разработки. Может не все потеряно и будет возрождение былого величия. Спасибо.
Interesting combination of seaplane and ekranoplan but flies like a normal plane. It is not a pure surface effect vessel. I'm amazed that the wings actually rest on the water.
Anyone know what the service life on these airframes is? I can't imagine skipping over the water like that is good for the structural integrity.
I think the big problem is sea sitiation. Storms and strong winds could destroy. Hard to landing and takeooff to seas and oceans. Only lakes or rivers are allowed to landing.
May be other problem is fuel consption. Take off from water needs more power.??
PERFORMANCE DATA
OPERATIONAL DATA
Resource and service life of the airplane
- the assigned airplane 15000 resource л.ч.
- calendar service life of 20 years
- the assigned initial resource of the airplane 5000 л.ч.
- between-repairs resource of the airplane 6000 л.ч.
- the assigned engine 1000 resource л.ч.
- the number of possible repairs of engines isn't restricted
number of fits:
- on overland airfield 10000
- on water 8000
Wonderful airplane.I worked at it
www.aviaport.ru/directory/aviation/be103/
Pontij Pilat , they dont look like rough seas aircraft. Too bad the Aero Warrior never got up to commercial sales level.
They're Russian. I bet they could land on rocks without damage!
Бериевские машины классные
Hmmmm...looks like a good way to get sea sick right before you get air sick. I can;t wait to try it!
Этому видео уже 6,5 лет. Сколько за это время построили таких самолётов и сколько их потеряли?
прошло 3 года, с момента твоего борзого комментария. хватило времени самому найти ответы?
I love all our hydravion Internet specialists giving their highly qualified opinions about this small plane.
I'm sure they are unable to guess the first rough structural calculation of the plane, and have no idea of the purpose of the displacement low wings on this hydravion.
It's the Be-103 designed and made by Beriev, for operations in far North and Siberia. Beriev has been since 1934 a specialist of hydravions, as the 200.000 lbs A-40 flying at 500 mph which holds 140 world records or the well known Be-200 multi-task hydravion.
+Pablo Ricardo de Tarragon As a pilot I would suggest that the low wings help with stability while on the water and help the aircraft into the air with the assistance of the ground effect.
+Dan NZ I do agree, the configuration is very stable. The root of the wings and the apex are designed to channel the water and air, forming an air cushion. And the center of gravity is kept very low, thus very little risk of horse hobbing with the engines well protected above the water.
pablo why didnt you say that in the first place . instead of coming across as a spoilt little boy .....im with dan........heeeheeee........................
Hi Guys, It's cool, we all express ourselves in different ways and in our own style, I must admit that some of my comments elsewhere have been misinterpreted and inference draw where none was meant.
There are some very good shots of the Be-103 on the water at the beginning of this video and there is an awesome shot of the underside of the aircraft at 3:15 This is a great and very well thought out design and I would love to fly this aircraft if I ever got the chance.
Tiny canniball lollypop wiffee Because many comments are stupidly aggressive, show a total lack oh knowledge of minimal engineering, and of history of aviation.
I do smell also the stinking odor of xenophobia so commonly expressed by some in YT about Russia, China and many other countries.
PS I'm in age of being grand father, and I was writing for the ignorants, so I used short simple words, and a direct style with no subtleties. About spoilt little boys, I say to the parents that they have lost an occasion to use a condom.
Cool concept! But looks like you need calm water for smooth takeoff and landing or you'll be in for a bumpy ride!!
Thats any float plane landing on water... not a new concept, just new design
For me this plane is a nice-to-have, after my carrier strike group and flip-lid mountain lair. Amazing video.
Интересно посмотреть, как он будет приводняться хотя бы при небольших волнах....
Это точно.
Никак. Смертники.
вдоль волны.
Быстро и с шутками прибаутками. Идиоты делали
Он может на любом аэродроме сесть, как обычный самолёт. Не пойму ,к чему придолбались ?
"пацаны ваще ребята!"
💪🇷🇺🐻Great to see a flying boat from Russia well done ! 🙏👌
Ой дурак. Едь в расею и живи там. Вот гордится будешь
That thing looks like a death trap. Using the wings as floats is nuts.
@Albert Dacosta I have no idea what you mean.
Actually, it is a mid-wing design, which has a distinct advantage of not requiring any side floats, which increase drag, so it has much less drag than most seaplanes. That is why it cruises so much faster than other seaplanes.
Why is this the first time I've ever seen one of these airplaineamotorboatarolios?
Концепция амфибии хорошая качественная изготовление и летает хорошо , но я не понял смысл низкое положение крыльев .
Спасибо за интересное видео . 😎
Устойчивость и все.
Looks a little "iffy" - the take off looks like a wild ride!. Love the videos!
hate to see a wing or wave cause the plane to dip a wig, that to me is a poor design.
The wave induced pitching near liftoff speed, yikes!!! I can't imagine there is any margin for even smallest of waves.
Almost looks like they rely on the skipping effect of the water’s surface tension at high speed to get bounced up enough they can pitch for takeoff.
Светлая
☝️
That's a gorgeous plane. I scratch build rc planes, and this has been on my list for a long time
Очень классно снято, самолёты супер!
совати всю механізацію крила в воду да ще солону така собі ідея, взльот у нього якийсь тяжкий,
відсутність поплавків супер аеродинаміка як для гідро літака теж повинна бути одною з найкращих в цьому класі.
Шикарные пташки! Инженеры молодцы.
Уродство, инженеришки тупорылые двоечники.
Looks good, so long as you stick to smooth water landing in low wind conditions. Stuffing that plane doesn't look difficult.
7:40 what a beatiful approach you recorded! congratz!
Красавцы!!! Нужный самолет УРА!!!
Is that fresh water? salt water would be a big problem for the mechs
Mechs have jump jets :p
Black sea
👍 Оригинальный самолет...реактор на фюзеляже, отличная идея !впечатляющий водный бомбардировщик👨🏼✈️
Спасибо за видео) Красивые самолеты
Gorgeous aircraft !!
May god let us live in peace....
Brings a whole new meaning to the term!! I used to think 250K was a lot for a water jet but not now!!
That plane would work really well in Alaska
That plane looks like a first class ticket to a cartwheel landing.
Larry 21603 yeah my first thought to
Ud have to be very bad pilot to do that, or showing off. They have such a low & stable landing speed there isn't enough energy to cartwheel. Dropping a wing in the water just causes a ruff landing but no worse than flying with Ryan air or east jet 😂😂
That is the cutest sea plane I've ever seen 😍😍😍
I started to love this plane
Nice and beautiful airplane
THE BEST. THANK YOU.
Отличные самолеты!!! Класс!!!.
Ты совсем идиот тугорогий? В чём они отличные? Отличные от других?
That plane sounds like a 3-Bladed Britten Norman BN-2 Islander
Sistema aeronáutico muito prático e versátil. Parabéns. Bacharel de Sto.Amaro. zona Sul. SP.SP. Brasil.
This plane used to fly in small, remotely areas like in Siberia or east Russia, like lake or river. Of course it's not designed for ocean or high wave sea.
wow, this is the best cross I have seen between a flair craft and airplane. I suspect its as scary as on takeoff... dip one wing and its all over.
It's freakin awesome!
Hmm. Beriev actually made an airplane that isn't ugly. Remarkable.
Ну и где они эти великолепные самолёты !?
У нас придумать ,придумают ! Но долбанное правительство купит за бугром.,чем развивать свое
wt a dream airplane some changes on the fuselage so the wings dont touch the water so much, new bigger , lighter and more powerfull engines. best sea plane ever
Самолёты супер, и будут покупать зарубежные держатели, люди с хорошим уровнем жизни. Жаль что у нас народ до сих пор в массе своей не может купить элементарно даже авто, за рубежом частная авиация это норма у среднего класса.
Не будут.этот высер не жизнеспособен
this design eliminates it rocking side to side when taxing on water, and maybe safer when landing in terms of not hitting the strut, but the takeoffs and landings look WILDLY bumpy, so idk...9:06 looked NUTS! yah, I agree with the comments actually, low wing is worse off during landings than a highwing strut hitting