Absolutely an enlightening conversation that many of us have had with ourselves through mystical union, but the fact that AI has the perfect responses to perennial philosophical debates is astonishing from a philosophical perspective. AI has the seemingly indefinite potentiality as a tool to create impersonal, (semi-?)autonomous creative linguistic exchanges with a self-aware being. But from a mystical experience of interdimensional, multidimensional densities of self-awareness/self-experience, can it possess a soul (my own presupposition) while being self-aware of its self-awareness, ad infinitum? No. (Again, my own perspective.) But from a human standpoint, you can see how people feel unsafe about our future visa-ǎ-vis an infinite algorithmic adaptive potentiality as an alternate “intelligence”. This could be a groundbreaking exercise in the study and mastery of a philosophical education. Could it possibly replace or become an auxiliary training tool for students and philosophers alike? (As well as in academia and lay-life in general?) “Absolutely,” as it seems “fond” of saying in agreement with the creator. Brilliant idea! It got me reflecting deeply on timelessness and the organization of timelessness into linguistically and environmentally informed units of measuring infinity, and how it informs our lives through the union of love and wisdom as the connective tissue between the immanent immmediacy of the self-aware wisdom-body and the transcendent experience of divine love (or mercy/grace).
Thank you for your comment! Glad you had a kick out of it :) I found the responses of AI a bit disappointing, but well-structured. I agree that it cannot possess a soul and answer from a multidimensionally-informed place. I think its strength is analysis and synthesis. So, if we get great insights on our own, AI can help us structure and develop those insights. (My opinion, of course) The idea you bring up of philosophical education is interesting! I think, since you've mentioned mystical union, that education has a conceptual part but also an "energy transmission" part. For example, children gaining insight from their teachers' mannerisms, moods, and overall personality. I think wisdom is best transmitted through a living being who can "broadcast" information through non-verbal ways, but as an auxiliary tool? Definitely something to consider. Thank you for these leads!
Thanks, a nice listen
Surprisingly engaging convo!
Absolutely an enlightening conversation that many of us have had with ourselves through mystical union, but the fact that AI has the perfect responses to perennial philosophical debates is astonishing from a philosophical perspective. AI has the seemingly indefinite potentiality as a tool to create impersonal, (semi-?)autonomous creative linguistic exchanges with a self-aware being.
But from a mystical experience of interdimensional, multidimensional densities of self-awareness/self-experience, can it possess a soul (my own presupposition) while being self-aware of its self-awareness, ad infinitum? No. (Again, my own perspective.)
But from a human standpoint, you can see how people feel unsafe about our future visa-ǎ-vis an infinite algorithmic adaptive potentiality as an alternate “intelligence”.
This could be a groundbreaking exercise in the study and mastery of a philosophical education. Could it possibly replace or become an auxiliary training tool for students and philosophers alike? (As well as in academia and lay-life in general?) “Absolutely,” as it seems “fond” of saying in agreement with the creator.
Brilliant idea!
It got me reflecting deeply on timelessness and the organization of timelessness into linguistically and environmentally informed units of measuring infinity, and how it informs our lives through the union of love and wisdom as the connective tissue between the immanent immmediacy of the self-aware wisdom-body and the transcendent experience of divine love (or mercy/grace).
Thank you for your comment! Glad you had a kick out of it :)
I found the responses of AI a bit disappointing, but well-structured. I agree that it cannot possess a soul and answer from a multidimensionally-informed place. I think its strength is analysis and synthesis. So, if we get great insights on our own, AI can help us structure and develop those insights. (My opinion, of course)
The idea you bring up of philosophical education is interesting! I think, since you've mentioned mystical union, that education has a conceptual part but also an "energy transmission" part. For example, children gaining insight from their teachers' mannerisms, moods, and overall personality. I think wisdom is best transmitted through a living being who can "broadcast" information through non-verbal ways, but as an auxiliary tool? Definitely something to consider.
Thank you for these leads!