The trigger for me is a dealbreaker. I love the cz both the c and the s for the trigger. I like the front and rear serations on the slide, the stippling on the grip the sights. For me the cz has it all.
Just getting into guns as of this year. After much research, my first purchase was M&P 2.0 9C. After much research, my first AR was M&P 15 Sport II. After much research, my first edc just might be M&P 2.0 Sub-compact. I am trying to like other brands, but M&P keeps messing it up.
The P-10s felt great in the hand with a dot mounted, sweet stock trigger too. Hopefully it doesn't experience issues like its big brother. I like the entire M&P line but I'm not a fan of the hinged trigger nor an aftermarket trigger for carry. If I were to pick between the two it would be the CZ. Nice work on the comparison, well done.
Have both....the M*P is great...the CZP10s (and C) is Exceptional. All my new shooters shoot the Cz much better. The Cz comes with front serrations and night front sights with superior trigger...similar cost. Golden age of handguns...love it!!
@@CoasterCoat I was referring to the S...not the C. Of all the guns...my kids have struggled to shoot M&P's well...no issues with Glocks Sig, Cz... I can't explain it. I carry an M*P9c mostly.
@@lazvt8469 im referring to the s. The p10s has a longer grip than the 2.0. Also im assuming most people have had accuracy and shooting issues with the 1.0s and the m&p9c 1.0. The 2.0s are WAYYYYY BETTER. I have a 2.0 4.25inch that i chose over the cz,glocks, sigs etc. I personally would have NEVER bought a 1.0 but these 2.0s are perfect for me
@@CoasterCoat Agreed...we have 3 M&P 1.0 in Shield and the 9c. I dropped a $40 polymer Apex into my 9c to salvage it...ended up being my favorite carry with a 3-round Hyve extension.
I started with CZ when the first 75's were imported. Mainly because of the price. I now have the P10 set F,C,and S. For me they just fit my hand perfectly. Now if the ammunition was available again for a reasonable price. The panic buying started a month after getting the S so I only have 250 rounds through it.
P10s is THE best sub-compact that I've ever owned. Checks the boxes for everything that you'd want from a pistol!! Highly recommend adding the CZ mag extensions...not so much for the 2 extra rounds, but more for the fuller grip!! The UTG pad gives the same size extension, but no increase in capacity and cost 50% more. You decide...
Your comment on how similar both these guns are, I have the p10s. I just purchased the Shield Plus out of the box does not work the sear pin fell out. Never loaded, never tried but will have to go to back to S&W. For me, not similar the CZ works. I will never be able to trust the S&W and when it gets repaired I will take the loss and sell it. One last thing I have another CZ the P01 as well as the new P10S. There is nothing that compares in quality, function and design then a CZ.
If you are in the fence the choice is easy. My experience with both firearm manufacturers in regards to repairs for two totally different guns than shown here is night and day. CZ returned my pistol in 3 weeks. On the S&W I am still waiting to get it back. It’s been over two months, and I haven’t heard anything other than they received it. You need to look at the full stream experience including serving your pistol. S&W quality is going down and CZ is on the rise.
Update - I did receive the S&W revolver back just over the 2 month mark. Great friendly people but the service they performed was minimal. I ended up sending the revolver to Pinnacle High Performance to smooth out the trigger action.
@@toynazi Zero issues with the P10C. I did have to send the CZ Shadow 2 back since the trigger retaining pin was working itself loose. Great people with superb service. Super happy with the results.
Cz...no doubt about it. The front of the slide on the MP is awkward. The hook trigger does add to the ability of a gloved trigger finger trying to find the sweet spot. They both shoot excellent.
How are you liking it so far? How's the size and grip? I keep hearing how its a "small" gun but it doesn't seem that way. Looks like it's a big enough size without being too big like a 2.0 compact 4inch or full size m&p
I went with the M&P 2.0 Sub Compact. I use the pinky extension on all magazines, switched out the trigger with an Apex trigger and sights with Truglo TFX Pro sights. A great EDC gun now.
Love my M&P 2.0 Compact. I have an Apex trigger on mine and it makes a world of difference. If we're talking about stock triggers though I would go with the CZ. Thank god we have a company like Apex to take our guns to the next level. I also own a FN 509 which is a perfect gun with a trigger reminiscent of the original M&P. An Apex trigger job fixed that.
I have both the Smith and Wesson 2.0 compact 4" barrel and the CZ P-10S 9mm's both are good for concealed carry and though they both have great triggers I find the CZ P-10S trigger seems a little faster shooting but my 2.0 M&P compact holds more rounds instead of 12 + 1 like the CZ P-10S it holds 15 + 1 or 17 + 1 depending on the magazine you choose to use! I don't think I can say a certain winner between the two so I am going to say it's a tie!!! 👍
I was trying to haggle on the price for a CZ P10s until I saw a video in which someone said it's hard to get that weapon even in normal times, and if you can get one, get it. So I got it! Should be here in a couple of days. Would love to compare notes.
Just got my CZ P-10 S and it feels so ergonomic and the trigger is so sweet can’t wait to get it to the range! I carry a M&P Shield Plus or my GLOCK 27 but I think this is going to be my new concealed carry gun!!!
Both are really good pistols. I'm not a fan of the triggers on the M&P series but I own a full size M&P and a Full Size Pro Series. The P 10 S is the one I bought.
For conceal carry, I’ve owned the P365, the XL, the Hellcat, and I’ve decided on the 2.0 Subcompact 9mm as well. It conceals really well, I still get 13 rounds, it handles like a full size in the grip even though it’s not, it fits like a glove, seriously, and it shoots well and always consistent. Honestly this M&P really surprised me, it’s my favorite all around conceal carry. Or home defense once I put the 17 round mag in the subcompact. It’s almost perfect.
I had access to both, but opted for a Canik TP9 Elite SC. After shooting one for a couple hundred rounds, it was the perfect fit for me. Hard to go wrong with any of the 3. Of the 2 in this vid, I like the trigger on the CZ, but everything else on the M&P. Guess it's a good thing that doing a trigger job isn't that painful.
Good comparison! Don’t personally have the small cz but do have cz’s and do own the subcompact m&p. I like the m&p also and it rides and shoots fantastic, especially for my xxl hands. Nicely done review!
I love my 4.25 inch 2.0 compact. It's just really good. You can even use the 17 round M&P mags. It's a great all around. For EDC though it's p365 all day long with a streamlight TLR 6 laser/light combo
Those are two "thorough-bred" pistols, can't imagine either of them being bad. I have always loved the M&P line, but the subcompact was my favorite in the series. I have not been able to find one of the new subcompacts but I will, eventually. I do have the P10s OR model, and it is very nice. I like that magazine base plate you put on there ~ looks awesome! Yet another excellent video brother, have a great week!
The better comparison would have been against the m&p 2.0 3.6" compact version i have both and on the m&p the trigger is different then subcompact and its a much closer comparison , both are really reliable and good shooting and groupings .
For us regular Joe's either pistol will do just fine and adjust to either one....I would love to own either....Good detailed review and opinion....Good stuff....
I went with the P10S for two reasons... that tiny bit of extra grip on the magazine is enough to give me a firm grip as opposed to a mostly 3 finger grip on the M&P. The second, the CZ, to me, is noticeably thinner as opposed to the thicker, more blocky M&P. I own several M&P guns including a Compact 2.0, a 9c original, a Bodyguard 380 and a couple of Shields, the 2.0 Shield 9 being my deep concealment carry gun. But for me, the P10S is finally the perfect double stack sized carry gun with an outstanding trigger.
CZ....optics ready, superior trigger, better front and rear serrations, removable backstraps, larger trigger guard, slightly longer grip, better sights. The M&P is no slouch but I think the CZ has it all over the M&P out of the box.
The flush fit magazine on the P10S would pinch my pinky between the base plate and the bottom of the frame at the grip every time I fired off a round. Other than that it was one of the Top 3 most impressive subcompacts I have shot. If not for the pinch I would have bought one immediately after running only 2 magazines through it.
I would love both but if I could only have one I'd go with the CZ. Trigger, optic ready, front night sight from factory and rounded trigger guard so no Glock knuckle. Also seen these 50-100 less than the 2.0. Sucks that it's discontinued.
If I purchase a gun for carry I always change the sights and trigger shoe. I also like the flat faced trigger. For me it comes down to the grip. The CZ polymer has always felt a little slick for me. I much prefer the polymer and texture of the M&P 2.0 series of pistols. My vote would be for the M&P over the CZ in every size category... that being said, I would still choose my P01 over any polymer pistol most days.
Guys! If it came with plates it would not cost what you pay now..I don’t run optics so I wouldn’t want the plates,I would be paying for something I don’t want..It’s a good option and it’s a cheaper option. Do you want optics by the plate for that one optic
It's now 2023. I have the 10 S, M&P Shield Plus PC and the Sig 365 XL. The 10S is a little wider than the other 2, but I feel I have a more substantial grip on the 10S. All 3 shoot very well. The 10S has tritium night sights, The Shield has fiber optic sights and the Sig has tritium/I have a red dot on mine. Trigger wise the Shield + Performance Center has the best trigger, but the 10S is close, with Sig the worst of the 3. Those are my carry rotation. I prefer my EDC to have night sights or an optic. I really like fiber optic sights but they are useless at night even with a weapon light. I like all 3 and what I carry depends on where I'm going and when.
Liking that the comment section seems to roughly equally promote one or the othe other without knocking the competition. Any other people with experience in customer service for either company?
Haven’t shot the M&P Subcompact, BUT I have the CZ P-10S OR, and it is my new favorite pistol. With an RMR, light, and base pads, it shoots like a bigger gun, but doesn’t have the length of my other guns when holstering AIWB. I like the trigger improvements on the M&P 2.0, and the M&P 2.0 4.25” Ported CORE in 9mm is on my radar, but given these 2 options... I’d give it to the CZ based upon the flatter trigger and optics cut at the same roundabout price point as the M&P.
I have both. They are both great guns but I carry the 10S more. The 2.0 C is a blue line special and it came with night sights and a little better trigger. It's a great shooter for sure.
I has a similar issue/feeling with the HBi trigger in my P10C that you experienced. I finally decided it was due to the sharp corner on the bottom of the trigger safety. After rounding, that off no more issues…
You hurt my heart on this one but I get your decision. I just got my p10s. I ordered what I thought was the or model from classic firearms, that's not what I got. They offered a refund but I chose to keep mine. This m&p is on my short list but I know I will immediately change that trigger, which is the 1st reason the p10s is a winner for me.
I put a $40 polymer Apex (trigger only) and ended up not only NOT selling the M&P.....but making it my first choice carry. The Hyve 3-round extension also added more 'grip' and a nice look too.
Agree completely.... I was going to buy P10s as soon as it was released until I found out my first generation P10c mags wouldn’t work in the S model. Cmon CZ. But alas... I just ordered a P10s this week. I caved 🙄
Good Video. Why didn't you change the trigger shoe on the M&P like you did on the CZ since you don't like it. I've owned both the Shield and the CZ p10c, looking to get a P-10s soon, I can find a few minor negatives with the Shield but none with the CZ.
Which one 🤔🤔🤔
Well I choose a bigger SAFE!!!!
How about that!😁😁😁😁
Actually I decided to also, I got both but got the optics ready version of the CZ! 😁😁😁😁
M&P for me !!
I think the trigger difference is fact. I had a 1.0 hot rod of it. Liked the idea of it but not the feel.
Still toting either Ruger service 6 or p239
The trigger for me is a dealbreaker. I love the cz both the c and the s for the trigger. I like the front and rear serations on the slide, the stippling on the grip the sights. For me the cz has it all.
Not a fair comparison. He has an aftermarket trigger in the CZ. If you ever felt the Apex Flatty in the M&P, you would be blown away!
@@meangene4038 Yeah, and that's an understatement.
Even the stock trigger on my 2.0 compact feels fine. I can cut baseball sized holes from 10 yards
I can assure you that if you have to shoot at someone, you won’t feel how good or bad the trigger is.
Overwatch Exactly!
Just getting into guns as of this year. After much research, my first purchase was M&P 2.0 9C. After much research, my first AR was M&P 15 Sport II. After much research, my first edc just might be M&P 2.0 Sub-compact. I am trying to like other brands, but M&P keeps messing it up.
You're not wrong, hands down best on the Market right now,
@@erniegarza4346 I agree. They're just making good stuff.
I like everything about the M&P line, particularly styling, but that ugly damn trigger just kills them for me. Price. Availability. Reliable.
Same thing.... always best choice
M&P all the way for me!
You obviously never shot a cz
The P-10s felt great in the hand with a dot mounted, sweet stock trigger too. Hopefully it doesn't experience issues like its big brother. I like the entire M&P line but I'm not a fan of the hinged trigger nor an aftermarket trigger for carry. If I were to pick between the two it would be the CZ.
Nice work on the comparison, well done.
Always CZ
Have both....the M*P is great...the CZP10s (and C) is Exceptional. All my new shooters shoot the Cz much better. The Cz comes with front serrations and night front sights with superior trigger...similar cost. Golden age of handguns...love it!!
Well the p10s IS BIGGER. No wonder they shoot it better. M&P for me. Theyre built better i think
@@CoasterCoat I was referring to the S...not the C. Of all the guns...my kids have struggled to shoot M&P's well...no issues with Glocks Sig, Cz... I can't explain it. I carry an M*P9c mostly.
@@lazvt8469 im referring to the s. The p10s has a longer grip than the 2.0. Also im assuming most people have had accuracy and shooting issues with the 1.0s and the m&p9c 1.0. The 2.0s are WAYYYYY BETTER. I have a 2.0 4.25inch that i chose over the cz,glocks, sigs etc. I personally would have NEVER bought a 1.0 but these 2.0s are perfect for me
@@CoasterCoat Agreed...we have 3 M&P 1.0 in Shield and the 9c. I dropped a $40 polymer Apex into my 9c to salvage it...ended up being my favorite carry with a 3-round Hyve extension.
Cz just has a better undercut on the trigger guard and a better out of the box trigger
I started with CZ when the first 75's were imported. Mainly because of the price. I now have the P10 set F,C,and S. For me they just fit my hand perfectly. Now if the ammunition was available again for a reasonable price. The panic buying started a month after getting the S so I only have 250 rounds through it.
P10s is THE best sub-compact that I've ever owned. Checks the boxes for everything that you'd want from a pistol!! Highly recommend adding the CZ mag extensions...not so much for the 2 extra rounds, but more for the fuller grip!! The UTG pad gives the same size extension, but no increase in capacity and cost 50% more. You decide...
Your comment on how similar both these guns are, I have the p10s. I just purchased the Shield Plus out of the box does not work the sear pin fell out. Never loaded, never tried but will have to go to back to S&W. For me, not similar the CZ works. I will never be able to trust the S&W and when it gets repaired I will take the loss and sell it. One last thing I have another CZ the P01 as well as the new P10S. There is nothing that compares in quality, function and design then a CZ.
If you are in the fence the choice is easy. My experience with both firearm manufacturers in regards to repairs for two totally different guns than shown here is night and day. CZ returned my pistol in 3 weeks. On the S&W I am still waiting to get it back. It’s been over two months, and I haven’t heard anything other than they received it. You need to look at the full stream experience including serving your pistol. S&W quality is going down and CZ is on the rise.
Good feedback about the service. Something I wouldn't have thought about.
What issue did you have with the CZ? Was it the 10S?
When I first got mine I had to send it back too. That's why I ask.
Update - I did receive the S&W revolver back just over the 2 month mark. Great friendly people but the service they performed was minimal. I ended up sending the revolver to Pinnacle High Performance to smooth out the trigger action.
@@toynazi Zero issues with the P10C. I did have to send the CZ Shadow 2 back since the trigger retaining pin was working itself loose. Great people with superb service. Super happy with the results.
The Czechs do pretty much everything they do excellent
Would like to see a comparison between the P10 S and the HK VP9/SK.... The M&P does nothing for me. But good review. Tx
I have over 1400 rounds with my P10s. Flawless. Its accuracy is outstanding. No problem hitting steel from 50 yards out
What kind of unit measurement is hitting steel at 50 yards?
instablaster
So. I have many like that.
Cz...no doubt about it. The front of the slide on the MP is awkward. The hook trigger does add to the ability of a gloved trigger finger trying to find the sweet spot. They both shoot excellent.
M&p subcompact w/ apex > everything
CZ ALL THE WAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Just got the mp subcompact 2.0. awesome gun. I've never had a issue with any Smith I've owned
How are you liking it so far? How's the size and grip? I keep hearing how its a "small" gun but it doesn't seem that way. Looks like it's a big enough size without being too big like a 2.0 compact 4inch or full size m&p
I went with the M&P 2.0 Sub Compact. I use the pinky extension on all magazines, switched out the trigger with an Apex trigger and sights with Truglo TFX Pro sights. A great EDC gun now.
Excellent comparison. Tough decision to make if trying to decide on one but I think the P10s has the advantage with the optic cut and trigger.
Cz wins in my opinion
Absolutely love the 2.0 series from Smith. Have several and would agree with most of your points. I have actually grown to love the curved trigger
Smith and Wesson M&P 2.0 Compact 3.6 for me with a Apex Trigger installed and upgraded Apex parts.
I love my 2.0 3.6 compact ..15 +1 ..awesome handgun
Love my M&P 2.0 Compact. I have an Apex trigger on mine and it makes a world of difference. If we're talking about stock triggers though I would go with the CZ. Thank god we have a company like Apex to take our guns to the next level. I also own a FN 509 which is a perfect gun with a trigger reminiscent of the original M&P. An Apex trigger job fixed that.
I have both the Smith and Wesson 2.0 compact 4" barrel and the CZ P-10S 9mm's both are good for concealed carry and though they both have great triggers I find the CZ P-10S trigger seems a little faster shooting but my 2.0 M&P compact holds more rounds instead of 12 + 1 like the CZ P-10S it holds 15 + 1 or 17 + 1 depending on the magazine you choose to use! I don't think I can say a certain winner between the two so I am going to say it's a tie!!! 👍
I have a CZ P-10 S inbound.
Thank you for the review!
I was trying to haggle on the price for a CZ P10s until I saw a video in which someone said it's hard to get that weapon even in normal times, and if you can get one, get it. So I got it! Should be here in a couple of days. Would love to compare notes.
Just got my CZ P-10 S and it feels so ergonomic and the trigger is so sweet can’t wait to get it to the range! I carry a M&P Shield Plus or my GLOCK 27 but I think this is going to be my new concealed carry gun!!!
M&P is definitely my choice after having the 2.0 fill size for years... Thousands of rounds with no issue whatsoever!
Both are really good pistols. I'm not a fan of the triggers on the M&P series but I own a full size M&P and a Full Size Pro Series. The P 10 S is the one I bought.
great comparison. use a p99c as my summer carry, because paddles are awesome
Shame Walther stopped using the paddle release on (most of) their guns!
For conceal carry, I’ve owned the P365, the XL, the Hellcat, and I’ve decided on the 2.0 Subcompact 9mm as well. It conceals really well, I still get 13 rounds, it handles like a full size in the grip even though it’s not, it fits like a glove, seriously, and it shoots well and always consistent. Honestly this M&P really surprised me, it’s my favorite all around conceal carry. Or home defense once I put the 17 round mag in the subcompact. It’s almost perfect.
I own both and I prefer the CZ over the M&P all day. For me personally just a better fit in my hands and a more accurate shooting handgun.
Thanks for the review. I was leanin M&P, but that CZ's now a consideration.
CZ wins no question.
Except it doesn't.
@@ChrisLoewdefinitely does
All day!
I had access to both, but opted for a Canik TP9 Elite SC. After shooting one for a couple hundred rounds, it was the perfect fit for me.
Hard to go wrong with any of the 3.
Of the 2 in this vid, I like the trigger on the CZ, but everything else on the M&P. Guess it's a good thing that doing a trigger job isn't that painful.
Good comparison! Don’t personally have the small cz but do have cz’s and do own the subcompact m&p. I like the m&p also and it rides and shoots fantastic, especially for my xxl hands. Nicely done review!
I love my 4.25 inch 2.0 compact. It's just really good. You can even use the 17 round M&P mags. It's a great all around. For EDC though it's p365 all day long with a streamlight TLR 6 laser/light combo
Those are two "thorough-bred" pistols, can't imagine either of them being bad. I have always loved the M&P line, but the subcompact was my favorite in the series. I have not been able to find one of the new subcompacts but I will, eventually. I do have the P10s OR model, and it is very nice. I like that magazine base plate you put on there ~ looks awesome! Yet another excellent video brother, have a great week!
Grabagun.com they are 390$
@@sunnycat69 Yep, thank you. I picked one up the other day. It should be at my FFL tonight. Cheers
M&Ps are just gorgeous guns. I have the 2.0 3.6" .40. One of my favorite handguns
What's the outcome of that searing pain on the CZ when firing? Was that ever figured out?
oldtwins na - has to be a nerve/pinch issue.
That M&P with Apex Flatty Trigger kit is even better than the CZ trigger.
Never seen a P-10s in person. I do have the P-10C and it is awesome.
CZ FANBOY here All Day.
But I have a couple Smith's, not hating , Butt the hinged triggers Suck, Stink & Smells.
The better comparison would have been against the m&p 2.0 3.6" compact version i have both and on the m&p the trigger is different then subcompact and its a much closer comparison , both are really reliable and good shooting and groupings .
For us regular Joe's either pistol will do just fine and adjust to either one....I would love to own either....Good detailed review and opinion....Good stuff....
the CZ might be finished alittle better, but they are both great choices....shoot both and make a choice.
The wait was so long for the P10s Optics version I sent mine to get milled it turned out excellent with the vortex venom red dot.
As far as price for the CZ, Grab A Gun currently sells Optics Ready for $418, granted, today is 8-25-24
... Agree ,, 2 good guns ... on ,,M&P .. install Apex trigger ........ on ,,CZ.. Install Extended slide release and Extended Mag release ..... huge improvements ..
I recently picked up the CZ p10s .I like it but I haven't had enought range time to put it in my rotation. The only M&P I have is the Shield.
Typical good ole boy choice. Glocks and S&W. I’ll go with the P-10S
not really it's what works best for the individual
P10 I am a huge Fan Trigger Trigger Trigger
I like both CZ and S&W, but between these two S&W for the win.
I went with the P10S for two reasons... that tiny bit of extra grip on the magazine is enough to give me a firm grip as opposed to a mostly 3 finger grip on the M&P. The second, the CZ, to me, is noticeably thinner as opposed to the thicker, more blocky M&P. I own several M&P guns including a Compact 2.0, a 9c original, a Bodyguard 380 and a couple of Shields, the 2.0 Shield 9 being my deep concealment carry gun. But for me, the P10S is finally the perfect double stack sized carry gun with an outstanding trigger.
CZ....optics ready, superior trigger, better front and rear serrations, removable backstraps, larger trigger guard, slightly longer grip, better sights. The M&P is no slouch but I think the CZ has it all over the M&P out of the box.
Yet the 2.0 still looks more refined and classier
Well, you have the same magazine capability. As you can use P10C mags in the P10.S
The flush fit magazine on the P10S would pinch my pinky between the base plate and the bottom of the frame at the grip every time I fired off a round. Other than that it was one of the Top 3 most impressive subcompacts I have shot. If not for the pinch I would have bought one immediately after running only 2 magazines through it.
Cz 🤔👌👊😁
The downside to the p 10s is no other magazine compatibility
Just got a M&P to carry, probably getting a cz next, just cause 😂
CZ...
I would love both but if I could only have one I'd go with the CZ. Trigger, optic ready, front night sight from factory and rounded trigger guard so no Glock knuckle. Also seen these 50-100 less than the 2.0. Sucks that it's discontinued.
Magazine costs, 'cause CZ is usually RIDICULOUS on their prices.
If I purchase a gun for carry I always change the sights and trigger shoe. I also like the flat faced trigger. For me it comes down to the grip. The CZ polymer has always felt a little slick for me. I much prefer the polymer and texture of the M&P 2.0 series of pistols. My vote would be for the M&P over the CZ in every size category... that being said, I would still choose my P01 over any polymer pistol most days.
Guys! If it came with plates it would not cost what you pay now..I don’t run optics so I wouldn’t want the plates,I would be paying for something I don’t want..It’s a good option and it’s a cheaper option. Do you want optics by the plate for that one optic
SS MR920 stung my pinky finger too. I thought maybe it was the baseplate?
It's now 2023. I have the 10 S, M&P Shield Plus PC and the Sig 365 XL. The 10S is a little wider than the other 2, but I feel I have a more substantial grip on the 10S. All 3 shoot very well. The 10S has tritium night sights, The Shield has fiber optic sights and the Sig has tritium/I have a red dot on mine. Trigger wise the Shield + Performance Center has the best trigger, but the 10S is close, with Sig the worst of the 3.
Those are my carry rotation. I prefer my EDC to have night sights or an optic. I really like fiber optic sights but they are useless at night even with a weapon light. I like all 3 and what I carry depends on where I'm going and when.
What about now same rotation? Or what is your favorite edc in 2024??
@@justdafax S&W Shield Plus Performance Center over 1k rounds, I no longer have the Sig. I do carry the P 10s occasionally.
@@davidsawyer6003 the 4 inch or the 3.1 inch?
@@justdafax 3.1
@@justdafax S&W just came out with their comp series I may get the new Shield plus in 4".
I have both and are great guns but the CZ shoots better for me
Performance center shield is better imo…that pistol is top notch…
Liking that the comment section seems to roughly equally promote one or the othe other without knocking the competition. Any other people with experience in customer service for either company?
Wait, this isn't nutnfancy
ummm no
Good comparison. I choose the cz all day. Trigger is great stock but I added the hbi industries trigger for that flat feel n added n rmr. Its tight.
Haven’t shot the M&P Subcompact, BUT I have the CZ P-10S OR, and it is my new favorite pistol. With an RMR, light, and base pads, it shoots like a bigger gun, but doesn’t have the length of my other guns when holstering AIWB. I like the trigger improvements on the M&P 2.0, and the M&P 2.0 4.25” Ported CORE in 9mm is on my radar, but given these 2 options... I’d give it to the CZ based upon the flatter trigger and optics cut at the same roundabout price point as the M&P.
Great choices....when you adding the apex to the m and p?
I have both. They are both great guns but I carry the 10S more.
The 2.0 C is a blue line special and it came with night sights and a little better trigger. It's a great shooter for sure.
I wish smith and Wesson come up with the optic Ready version I know that they will selling this gun like a hot pancake
I has a similar issue/feeling with the HBi trigger in my P10C that you experienced. I finally decided it was due to the sharp corner on the bottom of the trigger safety. After rounding, that off no more issues…
M&P for me thanks
You can't make a wrong decision here...
Are you kidding me change the trigger shoe on the 2.0 and it's an amazing trigger. Apples to oranges here.
Where can i find that M&P now? Everywhere i looked is sold out.
You’re too late for that lol you chose wrong time to buy a handgun.
Nice comparison M&P 2.0 for me!
Yep
Keep buying smittys and mo cz pour moi
I tried both of these (my friend's firearms) I liked shooting the P-10s better. Nice review!
the 365 and hellcat are double stacks. so they are in same category.
Do CZ P10M comparsion pls
You hurt my heart on this one but I get your decision. I just got my p10s. I ordered what I thought was the or model from classic firearms, that's not what I got. They offered a refund but I chose to keep mine. This m&p is on my short list but I know I will immediately change that trigger, which is the 1st reason the p10s is a winner for me.
I put a $40 polymer Apex (trigger only) and ended up not only NOT selling the M&P.....but making it my first choice carry. The Hyve 3-round extension also added more 'grip' and a nice look too.
M&p with the apex trigger hands down m&p
I got a P10S and an M&P 22 compact. Both great but I'm not in love with the M&P trigger.
.. Replace the M&P with an Apex trigger .... huge improvement ...
I typically agree with your choice, this time? CZ P10s is the choice.
It's all good
Check your finger 😂
The other +1 for the M&P is different caliber options. I'm interested in the .45.
The 45 is nice. Recoil is a bit much for long range sessions with the flat base pad.
Bought the cz because it was $335 shipped to my ffl lolol
Not OR but stillll
I choose both!
what about magazine comparability with their respective big brothers? M&P yes, CZ no?
I made a video discussing this very topic
Agree completely.... I was going to buy P10s as soon as it was released until I found out my first generation P10c mags wouldn’t work in the S model. Cmon CZ. But alas... I just ordered a P10s this week. I caved 🙄
M&P FOR THE WIN😎
Have your finger checked out !
Sadly it had to be amputated
CZ for me
Good Video. Why didn't you change the trigger shoe on the M&P like you did on the CZ since you don't like it. I've owned both the Shield and the CZ p10c, looking to get a P-10s soon, I can find a few minor negatives with the Shield but none with the CZ.