John Cleese Interviews Dr. Jim Tucker re: DOPS Research into Children's Past Life Memories
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 9 พ.ค. 2019
- (*Please note: all rights reserved )
John Cleese is a friend and supporter of the research being done at UVA DOPS into the nature of consciousness. Mr. Cleese has a long history of personal interest in this important area of inquiry.
In this video John Cleese is interviewing pediatric psychiatrist and director of UVA DOPS, Dr. Jim Tucker, about his research into the memories of young children who appear to recall specific factual memories of a previous life. In this video, Dr. Tucker presents some of the details of the case of 'Ryan' who recalled specific facts about the life of a man name 'Marty Martin'.
The Division of Perceptual Studies (DOPS) is a research unit within the Department of Psychiatry and Neurobehavioral Sciences at the University of Virginia Health System. The research faculty of the Division are known internationally for their expertise and research integrity in the investigation of phenomena relevant to the nature of consciousness and its relationship to the physical world. - วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี
![เกิดใหม่ทั้งทีก็เป็นสไลม์ไปซะแล้ว ซีซั่น 3 - ตอนที่ 59 [ซับไทย]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/GmW4a8prWUQ/mqdefault.jpg)
![ทัศนศึกษาโรงงานผลิตโค้ก [THAI/ENG SUB]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/M9y-TJBNem0/mqdefault.jpg)
More Jim Tucker and John Cleese, please!
This subject is amazing. Add John Cleese to the mix, and I'm sold on this phenomenon
Dr. Tucker's books are excellent if you're looking for more information! It's excellent to see rigorous scientific exploration of topics like these.
This is a wonderful interview. I had no idea Mr Cleese was a devotee of consciousness reaearch; I'm delighted that is the case. Thank you, Dr Tucker, for your labors building on Dr Stevenson's legacy!
@James Palmer2 My dear man, you are full of nonsense.
Fantastic video indeed. I still can’t get the episode of Fawlty Towers, with the rat in in out of my head every time I see John Cleese. When you take the reincarnation evidence, the NDE studies, the remote viewing undertaken at SRI, shared death experiences, it’s hard to argue against PSI being anything other than real. How it all works, maybe through multiple dimensions in space and time (string theory) etc hopefully the physics will eventually be clear. If possible it would be great to hear more about the evidence of personality transfer that has been reported following organ transplants. This area is especially fascinating. Keep up the cutting edge work DOPS.
Holy shit, I had no idea John Cleese was so knowledgeable about this subject. He even mentioned Ian Stevenson.
i know I'm kinda randomly asking but do anybody know of a good site to stream newly released series online?
@Anakin Axl i watch on flixzone. You can find it by googling =)
@Hamza Ace Yup, I have been using Flixzone for years myself :)
@Hamza Ace Thank you, I signed up and it seems like they got a lot of movies there :) I appreciate it !!
@Anakin Axl happy to help :)
Fabulous! More, please!
...and the child said to his grandfather: "yeah wel, I didn't believe in reincarnation when I was your age either..." ☺
LOL
😄
Fantastic conversation.
great stuff ! amazed to see cleesey!
Awesome!
JOE ROGAN INTERVIEW THIS MAN!
Haha. I actually emailed Joe Rogan's booking agent to encourage him to bring him on his show (I'm sure it will never be read lol), so glad to know someone share's my hope that he will interview him.
I want to see jim tucker on the joe rogan podcast
I don't think Joe Rogan would want Jim Tucker on his show because I remember watching one of his podcasts and Joe Rogan made the statement that "all psychic phenomenon has been shown to be complete bullshit."
@@johnwindle4304 thats pretty sad because him ian stevenson have had kids who talk about the afterlife before picking their parents joe rogan just doant want to be wrong
@@aw8327 proven bullshit
@@johnwindle4304 Joe is all about having conversations with people though, right? Even if he disagrees with this stuff I bet he would be interested, though I could be wrong.
@@johnwindle4304 amazing how people who can not silence their inner dialogue for as little as 30 seconds, have not a clue what Thoughts are, without which they have nothing at all, can make such sweeping statements.
So interesting
Look into Tom Campbell's work, MBT. There is a coherent logical framework and model available to explain this, and so much more. Thank you both for contributing to an updated mainstream view of a larger reality!
Same can be said for the Stuart Hameroff and Roger Penrose Orch OR theory of consciousness. Very interesting stuff!
A "logical framework" doesn't mean a goddamn thing and in fact its actually a logical fallacy. This is because you can construct any argument that is internally logical but can still be completely devoid of truth due to the absence of facts. Here's a simple example: Nelly is an elephant, all elephants are purple, therefore Nelly is purple. Logical? Yes. Factual? Absolutely not. So its evidence that decides the validity of the claim NOT a logical construct. First you need evidence, then second you use logic to analyze that rviddnce. So Tom has it backwards because he's giving his "logical argument" before he has any evidence of anything supprtive of his claim.
Two luminaries.
That really was something completely different.
In a previous life John Cleese was Basil Fawlty.
As someone comes from Asia (Vietnam to be correct), reincarnation is widely accepted here. You can go to some Buddhist temple/pagodas here to ask a Buddhist monk about your past life, only you need info for your current life.
Could you give me more info about this monk please?
Thank you so much for this video! Do you have any update of Ryan? Is he still remembering something from his previous life?
He remembers bits and pieces of it. The memories manifest themselves like dreams these days. He’s not happy to talk much about it though; feeling abnormal, misunderstood and “non-Christian” is still a trauma to him :/
There was a series on Netflix or amazon...watched it last year. Lots of cases!
So Marty Martin died in 1964. When was Ryan born?
👍👍👍
I love the voice tone inflection when Dr. Tucker said "Because it happens here." 😆 - with a glimpse of deviousness and impishness, which makes me think there's some backstory involving someone which this is likely reaching where they were proven wrong in a disagreement they had with him.
Hah, even little thing like that I'm enjoying here, every little detail.
Also, why was reincarnation being a cultural thing only or regional somehow to only certain places in the world even raised as a serious question? I take it that wasn't someone within DOPS who asked that?
I hope there is an afterlife option. Physical existence has too much suffering.
Young boy, 9/11, reincarnation of a firefighter. Full story as told by the boy's mother on (and off) a reincarnation forum. Fire in the Soul: Reincarnation from Antietam to Ground Zero.
Where can we find more about Rian ? Does someone know ?
Jim Tucker wrote up the case in his book "Return to Life".
Gen. Patton in the movie says he had lived before and his aide with him just had to stand there and listen and keep his mouth shut or be whipped I guess. Its fun to explore.
CC's aren't working. 🤔
There's no reasonable explanation except for a Cyber Stalker aka hacker tweaking my TH-cam app with a synced Emulator that's got my phone's information on his Emulator without my permission. i'm hearing impaired with ear phones in & volume maxed out.
If the researchers were able to go unearth this information, it is possible the family could have been likewise gathering it and crafting it in to childlike statements to fool us. But what would be their motivation to go through all that effort? And 2500 cases like this? That would be a lot of pranksters. I'd like to know how many of the cases are somewhat clear versus how many the researchers really had to go looking for someone who matched the description. There have been a lot of people in the world, so a random few facts could fit many lives. There would be a survivorship bias at play in that case. Intriguing, though. Definitely want Joe Rogan to get to the bottom of this.
1500 cases have been factually verifiable, 1000 have been indeterminate. These cases include children as young as two years old. It is impossible to orchestrate a two year old child to act and speak as you want them to. This research is incredible and would be revolutionary if it weren’t for the narrow-minded attitude of the material scientific community. They act as if dualism is impossible within physics, which is a big lie. The founding fathers of physics as we know it were dualists and mystics, and there are still a lot of physicists who believe in the dual nature of man (Dr. Jim Tucker is one of them, but there are a lot of other big names). The smartest man in the world, IQ 200, strongly believes that the soul survives bodily death, and is working on a way to scientifically describe it. A lot of scientists share the same belief, but are sadly too afraid to talk about it since it would lead to getting ridiculed by their colleagues and therefore losing their jobs.
@@Nerkin610 Can i ask how did you find out 1500 cases have been verified
@@Nerkin610 How were the 1500 cases verified? Also, mystical or dualistic explanations do not need to be invoked to explain this if it is indeed real
@@moshekallam1070 Verified in the sense that the people these children claim they remember being are actually identified as real people, and the specific details remembered by said kids also tend to match reality.
I recommend studying the case of Ryan Hammons, a kid who remembered a life as a Hollywood extra. He recognised his old self in a book on Hollywood, and provided information that surpassed or contradicted public records, but later could be verified by the family of the deceased man. I think it was more than 50 unique details he could provide. He got the year of death correct even though the official death certificate had gotten it wrong, he knew the colour of the car he drove (the family didn’t know themselves but would later identify the car through old photo albums), he knew that he got his daughter a puppy when she was a kid and that she did not like it, he knew of trips to Paris, he knew of the connections to the mayor and remembered or half-remembered names of friends and locations that were relevant in his life. Etc etc.
I also recommend studying the case of James Leininger. A toddler knowing complex details of military planes that he couldn’t possibly have learned anywhere. He insisted to call himself James 3 and would not write his name in any other way when signing his drawings of airplanes. He began having night terrors regarding a crash where he and his friend Jack died. He could identify the area where the plane had been shot down, and through research it was therefore possible to find the case of military pilot James Huston and his crew mate Jack Larsen having their plane shot down, both dead in the crash. James Huston was James Jr, which may be why James Leininger saw himself as James the third.
These are brilliant studies conducted at University of Virginia, currently lead by the incredible Dr. Jim Tucker. Dualism would have to be correct for this to make sense though, since we would have to have souls that are transferable between different physical bodies.
I still got a question. Is family same? Are people raising their past children?
I am not an expert, but am well read in the subject. There is one well known account of a kid who had his grandfather's memories, and other less famous ones, but I beleive overall is appears that most are from unrelated families. As this video indicates it appears that people often have memories of being from the same country as the current incarnation, and even the same general region, but that is not a hard and fast rule either. Lots of good reading on this subject, I encourage you to study it further.
A very good account of spontanious memories and a woman who chose to find her previous family is in Jenny Cockel's "Yesterday's Children". You can look her name up and get much of her story here on TH-cam. I know her, and she is honest, practicle, and reliable, and not at all off the wall.
It is at 6 months that the fetus starts developing the conscience - brain is like a TV receiver - it gets signals from outside - so it maybe that somehow a dead person's memory is received by a new fetus - it does not necessarily mean that the person is the same - but a different bag of flesh, bones and skin - the memory may pass like a relay runner handing over the baton to another person and stops running - baton is the memory - this my favorite speculation on the matter
@@nayanmaliglmao what are you on about
@@stover14 Hindu reincarnation there is a soul travelling from body to body - Buddhist have rebirth which is a different concept altogether and is mostly overlooked - rebirth is mixed up with reincarnation deliberately or by ignorance - Buddhism says there is no soul or person but a temporary collections of five senses packed into skin, bones, flesh and fitted with organs like brain, lungs, heart etc - at death the body rots away and conscience is released into nature - the same person will never be born again because there is no single person - conscience is a form of energy like radio waves and the brain is a receiver - there has been experiments where the brain has been completely removed from a patient and hooked onto a machine - but the brain still receives signals - which means the brain has nothing to do with the body - all of us are carrying a brain that receives signals from outside - there is no thinker inside thinking and making decisions - it's an illusion - we are like robots
@@nayanmalig so according to Buddhism we just fade away?
Wow! 50 statements by the little boy matched up!
.......out of how many? 😉
I would add to what is the probability of each statement being true that the kid made? For example, were they mostly ones that anyone could guess at random? (I.e, what color was his car, did he have a house, apt, or condo?) In order to be statistically significant you need a p-value of 0.01 or 1/100. So if the kid is only guessing on things that have say a total of 10 possibilities and even if he guesses correctly then that's only 1/10 of the statistical validity you need to obtain significance let alone factual status which is 100 times more improbable with a p-value of 1/10,000. So yeah, definitely a lot of questions to be answered.
I think I heard him say in an another interview that the kid made 53 or 56 statements. I don't remember which but I know for sure it wasn't more than 56.
The statements were often detailed and could not be guessed (nor found through public information and in some cases not even through the family’s knowledge). The very few statements that weren’t verified were either off or simply couldn’t be verified due to lack of archival information. Regardless, the statistics are obvious.
If I remember correctly he made 3 statements wrong
- He said he’d been cremated (he was buried)
- He said he’d bought his daughter a guard dog (it was a smaller dog like a cavalier or something)
- He was given 5 sets of pictures and correctly found the person he knew in only 3 of them. However the last two sets were the ones he got wrong.
@james palmer interesting second video, thanks!
I enjoyed this, but I imagine those Cleese fans who cleave to fundamentalist materialism ideology will think: "John Cleese is into reicanrnation "wu wu" and psi? That dead parrot won't fly!"
💪☯👌
Why nothing new in years? This program still going?
Are you really sure it would have been impossible to know by ordinary means? You are counting on the mother being honest, but what if she isn't? What if Marty Martin was a relative of a friend or something and she knew all about him? I'm not saying this is what happened, but it's not impossible. At least not based on your description of the case.
You should read ian stevenson s books they go in great detail about the process
Same exact thing I was thinking.
Yes, but they have hundreds of cases like this. Maybe some would be made up by the parent, but you wouldn't expect that many ordinary people to be hoaxing it all.
@james palmer - Wow you wrote a lot there. I don't think you're right tho.
WHY IS JOHN CLEESE INTERVIEWING A REINCARNATION PSYCHIATRIST? WHAT THE FUCK HAVE I CAME ACROSS LMAO
I thought John was a confirmed atheist and material science guy
Does that mean he can't have an open mind to an opposing view?
Not all atheists have the ignorant belief that they can be certain of anything. Nobody knows. It's arrogant for anyone to think they "know" anything. Intelligent people can keep an open mind even if they are skeptical.
Non-theism doesn't require being close to the physical possibility of the rebirth of consciousness in another body. We came to life once did we not?
This has nothing to do with religion
Reading on the topic it seems to be a load of bull...
Yeah, that’s the way forwards.
Quite the opposite, in my opinion. There are lots of examples of children nailing the quizzes set up to test them, and then providing tens and tens of unique details that are later verified. Details that only the deceased’s family could have known about, and sometimes details that not even they knew of.
Ryan insisted that Marty Martyn died at 61. The official death record said that he died at 59, but the age of 61 was confirmed by the family. Ryan also stated that Martyn owned a green car, which the family denied until they dug among old pictures and found that he indeed used to own one. Ryan stated that Martyn had given his daughter a dog for her birthday, and that she didn’t like it. This was verified by the daughter. The list goes on...
2:57 ... and that's a big problem right there. They usually talk to the parents, not the child. You do this and you have just introduced all kinds of room for deception. The whole factor of "the family didn't know the stranger before we connected them" is now uncertain and therefore, worth nothing. Even if you talk directly to the child, any of this stuff could be set up once the parents are involved, and unfortunately, there's no way around that, because the parents could always have fed this information to the kid. It's interesting, but unfortunately, seems like it will never get past 'inconclusive'.
As far as I know, Tucker already dealt with those problems you mention in his articles.
@@zakhust6840 "dealt with"
A physician, qualified child psychologist, and he can't pronounce "niche." 'Murica!
Why do people lap this garbage up?
1. The *strongest cases* which offer Cleese his requested 'scientific facts' is the ability of the investigators to confirm that 'past life' claims are consistent with some known historical person and their life.
2. He gets (in the overwhelming majority) reports of 'past lives', second hand, after the fact, and from the parents, not the kids, some of which won't even speak to him, and information (some of which) via email and letters and not face to face where dynamic questioning could take place.
3. The *best evidence* in the case of Ryan, is claims of a kid who somehow knows 'George,' and knows he should be in Hollywood, knew he had a talent agency, danced, *however* was unable to provide his own name, and said his address had 'rock' or 'mount' in it.
Count the hit and make it fit (rock), and bin the miss (mount).
4. *Investigator:* '(Ryan) ... had knowledge of a life
5. *Cleese:* 'Well *there can be no ordinary means.* There has to be some sort of psy explanation somewhere along the line.' (For the alleged phenomena.)
Even before I got near making the point that these are double whammy blind assertions; the first necessitating 'psy', the second being the asserted existence of 'psy' phenomena without any evidence or clarification, but that this would or even could somehow explain anything, I was compouded dumbfounded with the responding statement of the *scientifically minded* 'investigator.' (I couldn't write that with a straight face 😂 )
*Investigator:* 'That's right. *There certainly seems to be something.. erm.. psy or psychic like you say,* to explain it, *because there's no way to explain it away.* '
If people can't see the fallacies here (black and white, argument from ignorance, and specifically the subtype argument from personal incredulity,) then I can be of no further assistance.
I highly doubt anyone asked for your assistance to begin with.
Memory is selective at least saying. We can remember where we put key ten years ago but we cannot remember face of a guy we spoke to few days ago. Or I face sometimes when people can't tell their age at once, especially the elder one. So, your argument about that kid not remembering his previous name is unconvincing at least.
Or another arguement: if kids remeber facts of life of long dead person and born with scars or birthmarks on places of mortal wounds of that particular dead person what the reason of it? Give the scientific based explanation without "psy".
If you want to prove that this evidence is fake prove it another way.
This is just an interview. To actually see how the research looks like, you should read Tucker's book, or preferably his predecessor, Ian Stevenson's.
Lmao. You're correct, these 21st century TH-cam scholars just keep getting fooled.
@@jessehines4044 Fooled by a top 50 US university?
CC's aren't working. 🤔
There's no reasonable explanation except for a Cyber Stalker aka hacker tweaking my TH-cam app with a synced Emulator that's got my phone's information on his Emulator without my permission. i'm hearing impaired with ear phones in & volume maxed out.