The evidence that God exists (from the channel Ask Cliffe)

[@kenmashikin]

Like the guy said: "I don't like him but he is good".

[@stevenvialpando8365]

No that one got me to😮

[@BradTiehen]

😂one of the best side comments ever in a video like this!

[@JohnnyStanley4844]

I like him I believe he is good with people He is kind hearted I can see he really believes in God he knows we walking in God's sight . So be good boys and girls

[@gingercake0907]

Well people don’t like it when they meet someone who destroys their mythology or preconceived notions and they really don’t have an argument to counter it. In other words they can’t stand that he’s right. It says more about them they have holes in their arguments.

[@Billy313rd]

Why don't you like him?

[@KevinBoklage1984]

God bless cliff ✝️ ❤️🙏🏻

[@eclipse4564]

People always say, "Why should I believe in a 2000 year old book that Jesus lived and actually existed?" But people like Julius Cesear, who also existed 2000 years ago, but people believe he lived from the books historians wrote about him back then and that people rely on today to know about him. So, in conclusion, to people out there who don't trust the Bible as evidence than most of history you know you shouldn't trust either

[@Workingtobecomebetter]

Thanks for this I need some help to strengthen my faith in Jesus God bless you Amen

[@connerpowersyoutube]

Cliffe is a good man 🙏

[@superjumpbros64]

God is good. Thanks cliffe

[@kiefercatron5436]

The Universe is under no obligation to make sense to you. --Neil deGrasse Tyson (2017)

[@8thMusketeer]

Hope you don't get all your philosophy from Neil Tyson

[@VictorReborn]

Gender is a spectrum - Neil Tyson

[@VictorReborn]

Neil Tyson is bought and sold

[@alodebel4116]

Neil: God is not all good or not all powerful because of problems in the world with evil. (Freewill given by God)😅

[@VainFriggus]

Tyson is an idiot lol

[@kekomi9504]

The analogy of the presidential heads at Mount Rushmore is often used to illustrate the concept of design. While it is true that the intricate carving of the heads suggests human design, it is important to note that this analogy does not directly apply to the complexity and diversity of life or the origins of the universe. Comparing the deliberate actions of humans to the natural processes that shape life and the universe can be misleading.
The idea of an uncaused cause as the most probable and logical cause of the universe is a philosophical argument. While some may find it compelling to attribute the existence of the universe to a divine being or God, it is important to recognize that this is a matter of personal belief and interpretation. The question of the ultimate cause of the universe remains a subject of ongoing scientific and philosophical inquiry.
The conditions necessary for life on Earth, such as the distance from the sun, are often cited as evidence for a guiding intelligence. However, it is essential to consider the vastness of the universe and the possibility of other habitable environments. The notion that Earth's conditions are uniquely tailored for life may be a result of the anthropic principle, which suggests that our observations are influenced by the fact that we exist.
The complexity and information within a single cell are indeed remarkable. However, it is important to note that the processes of evolution and natural selection can account for the development of complex biological structures and functions over time. The gradual accumulation of small changes, guided by natural selection, can lead to the diversity and complexity we observe in living organisms.
The concept of irreducible complexity, proposed by Michael Behe, suggests that certain biological structures cannot be explained by gradual evolution. However, this argument has been widely criticized within the scientific community, as numerous examples of complex biological systems have been explained through step-by-step evolutionary processes. Irreducible complexity does not invalidate the overall theory of evolution.

[@eyoungjeung9058]

First point: The evolution theory is called a theory for a reason. It is not a law, it is based on all species are related and gradually change overtime. Of course, that theory was proposed by Darwin, but his theory was not fully proven and replicated throughout the scientific literature to be called evidence. So, don't base his theory as evidence.
Second point: The diversity and complexity we observe in living organisms is what proves that God exists. The complexity we observe in the living organism points to an intelligent mind that is beyond human evolution. It is not simply by chance alone. How can a single animal cell have diverse functions, such as a mitochondrial, to work together with other cells, such as the nucleus and ribosome, to help keep it alive? Just by working efficiently and thoroughly proves that an intelligent mind makes the cell function the way it does. The cells have been the same for thousands of years, it did not change or adapt to its environment. For example, the mitochondria is still able to produce ATP, it has not change overall the last thousand of years. So the evolution theory would be ambiguous to disapprove that God exists.
Third point: The uncaused cause proves that God exists. According to Julius Robert, energy cannot be created or destroyed. Based on his LAW, not theory, energy cannot be created. So, using that law, what made the universe? Of course, there are many theories out there, but lets choose the big bang theory. If the big bang theory were to be true, than what caused the big bang theory? You can see that there is an error, to that law. The only way to explain that error is that God is the one that caused the big bang theory. God is an outlier, God is beyond matter and energy, so he is able to cause the uncaused. Unless if you could disapprove of Julius Roberts's Law, there should be an intelligent mind that caused the big bang theory.
Hopefully, this broadens your perspective and not just base your views on theories. God bless you.

[@kekomi9504]

​@@eyoungjeung9058 First point: The theory of evolution is indeed called a theory, but let's get one thing straight. In scientific terms, a theory is not just some wild guess or speculation. It's a well-substantiated explanation supported by a vast amount of evidence. The theory of evolution has been extensively tested and confirmed through numerous scientific studies and observations. It is widely accepted within the scientific community as a valid explanation for the diversity of life on Earth.
Second point: Ah, the complexity of living organisms. Yes, it is indeed remarkable, but that doesn't automatically prove the existence of a god. The complexity we observe can be explained through the processes of evolution and natural selection. Over millions of years, small changes accumulate, leading to the development of complex biological structures. The efficiency and functionality of cells can be attributed to natural processes, not the work of an intelligent mind. Evolution does not require cells to change or adapt in the same way over thousands of years. It's a gradual process that occurs over vast stretches of time.
Third point: Ah, the uncaused cause argument. You bring up Julius Robert's law of energy conservation, but you misunderstand its application. The law states that energy cannot be created or destroyed within a closed system. The universe, however, is not a closed system. The big bang theory suggests that the universe originated from a singularity, a state of extreme density and temperature. The cause of the big bang is still a subject of scientific inquiry, but it does not automatically point to the existence of a god. It's important to recognize that asserting a god as the cause of the uncaused is a leap of faith, not a scientific conclusion.

[@YoBoiHrcky]

Thank you ChatGPT

[@larryyarger9962]

Dr Behe has indeed been criticized, but not disproven. He has shown that the cell itself must come together completely formed in order to function. It cannot "evolve" piece by piece, let alone do it irrationally and by chance! If the cells of the eyes are irreducibly complex, it follows that the eyes are also irreducibly complex!

[@charlesadair73]

@@kekomi9504” Over Millions of years small changes accumulate”. Sounds a whole lot like “God of the gaps” …..don’t tell that evolution is not a religion….it takes more blind faith to believe in macro evolution than any belief in God….show some evidence …not just what you heard your professor tell you ..

[@il_jbizzy_li]

Anyone know where I can watch the whole thing?

[@VainFriggus]

Cliffe Knechtle his channel is “Give Me An Answer”

[@user-cv7bl2jb5t]

My guess is the students asking questions are plants
Just because something has the appearance of design doesn’t make it so
There may very well be a creator but this has nothing to do with joining a cult

[@sombrerofatcat]

That's a different argument entirely

[@linkinarmory]

There was no 11 cuz he said 8 twice👍🏼

[@southernbybirth8418]

Brilliant!

[@firemission1477]

Nothing 'brilliant' about Cliffe's dishonesty. Claims are not evidence..

[@bigmanvideoz]

@@firemission1477 Can you atheists just keep an open mind for one second. Did you even watch the video?

[@firemission1477]

@@bigmanvideoz the position of Atheism is the very definition of open mindedness unlike so called christians. The actual question is did you watch the video?

[@superjumpbros64]

​@firemission1477 no, athiests believe their own truth. It is hard to talk to an athiest because they believe everyone else to be wrong. Cliffe here is asking you to think and analyze the gospels. He never once said for you to believe because he believes.

[@jpnelson84]

Wow that toledo kid needs schooling that isn't from the govt

[@user-vm5yk2js6w]

Someone: You have no evidence for your god.
Cliffe: You dont build your life on evidence.
Someone: Ah ok, then which of the 2000 gods shall I follow?
Cliffe: Follow the evidence.

[@sombrerofatcat]

When did he say not to build your life on evidence?

[@dayweed85]

this guy is clueless. how can anyone take him seriously?

[@blitzrn6683]

least obvious rage bait

[@Yes08611]

He calls Mount Rushmore natural he’s delusional

[@blitzrn6683]

@@Yes08611 No he calls them manmade and says its delusional to think that something like that could be created without an intelligent mind

[@KO_116]

@@Yes08611 no that’s not what he meant, he meant there is always a creator to something created

[@VainFriggus]

@@Yes08611he says it’s NOT natural, that it was created by an intelligent mind

[@jagdeepsingh3887]

Moral absolutes. The vatican has enough money to end world hunger but its not gods plan i guess.

[@hugomendoza4998]

Do you think they were the ones who wrote the gospel?

[@breezydj9910]

The pope and vatican are not god, jesus is god and he healed the sick, fed the hungry and clothed the naked, dont look at Christian hypocrites and let them turn you off to the truth

[@Dom-lj2dw]

Hi, please let me know if this explanation helps. The Vatican is run by humans. Humans are not perfect. They do not make good decisions sometimes, maybe even most of the time. Greed or other things get in the way. But, the fact that you understand that them not ending world hunger is wrong shows that it is morally wrong. You understand that and so do I. They would probably agree, but their imperfect nature as a human leads them to choose what they know to be wrong

[@rem0live75]

can someone tell me which video of cliff is this?

[@theonlyrehia]

its in the description

[@Ubong_Johnny]

Cliff you're good👏👏

[@skellyskeleton4676]

Interesting how he never answered his follow up question as to why “his” god is, in his eyes, the right one ( 0:13 ). There is no way to explain his faith to “his” specific god without referencing personal experience, and he knows it. Him dodging the question by dragging on the first part was an admittedly smart play on his part.

[@Toxlcltyy]

Cliffie has answered this many times in past and recent videos. His answer was that nobody else is more reliable than Jesus, nobody else has related to everyone nor has lived like Jesus, what he thought and how he died. Jesus by far the most reliable.

[@skellyskeleton4676]

@@Toxlcltyy sorry but how does Jesus being the “most reliable” mean in anyway that the Christian god is the “correct” god. That’s basically like saying that if someone only tells the truth then they are incapable of lying. I’m not saying Jesus was lying it’s just I find it absurd that the whole religion is based off of Jesus saying “trust me guys” with no logical evidence of his god being the right one.

[@Toxlcltyy]

@@skellyskeleton4676 except that thats impossible for a normal human, if you never sinned at all and claimed to be God revealing himself in the flesh then proceeds to rise from the dead I'll listen to everything bros say

[@Toxlcltyy]

@@skellyskeleton4676 the religion isn't based on "trust me guys" its based on how Jesus backed up his divinity claim by living a sinless life, dying forgiveness his enemies, and rose from the dead

[@skellyskeleton4676]

@@Toxlcltyy it’s like I get what your saying and tbh Jesus, god and honestly mostly everything surrounding the religion sounds great with, I sure, just as great intentions for humanity. But it’s just that where is the factual evidence that god told people what a sin fundamentally and it wasn’t just the people who wrote the Bibel’s own believes (I’m not saying they are are bad constructs just that there is no connection to god without reference to the Bibel)
Also dying and forgiving my enemies logically has nothing to do with the credibility of one’s statements or believes, so why is this an argument for evidence for the christian God. And that he rose from the dead, come on, give me one bit of historical evidence.

[@DoingThingsToStuff]

All the "this doesnt prove anything" comments. All people who werent paying attention.

[@kiefercatron5436]

Just because you don't understand something doesn't attribute it to God

[@frang2023]

Yep, that's a fallacy

[@Jakomaniac1]

Yeah but at the same time you can’t say god doesn’t exist just because something doesn’t make sense

[@Getthetruth5]

​@@Jakomaniac1good point

[@VainFriggus]

This statement doesn’t prove anything

[@kiefercatron5436]

@@VainFriggus that's why it's called faith dipshit

[@TheDooj]

I can prove my own existence better than even just the evidence of god

[@tooomuchsausedrippen9720]

It’s not for you understand u are a human in human conscience, what goes on outside of this world is above ur conscience that why Jesus told us to have faith that there an existing God that loves you

[@tooomuchsausedrippen9720]

just because YOU think somethings not true doesn’t mean that it’s not true

[@jovanarosic3606]

​@@tooomuchsausedrippen9720 I would say he has conscience in him and there's conscience that is beyond all of us. But Christianity is religion with least amount of errors and even without them. We just can't understand God 100%. Since I was into astrology and spiritual God is probably energy so strong but full and overloving literally the most loving and absolutely loving all Spirit that us who think with logic and heart almost the same in differents of us there's God who thinks trough love and himself wich is amazing. So when he decided to make angels and humans who disappointed him he always gets questioned because how human think very logically trough fear instead of love. I'm sorry for him but also humans who are in hell but God will make everything righteous. God is in spiritual realm and even when he created us in his image made us a lot different than him. Just like he made angels so they can't be God.

[@tututpatutut8001]

Cliff beliefs are just a imagination😅

[@adisharr]

If religion and science both disappeared, science would again eventually repopulate our knowledge into what we know today. Religion would be completely different if anything with different gods and religions.

[@joellebo5109]

This would only be true if There wasn’t a God. But there is

[@adisharr]

@@joellebo5109 No proof or evidence at all.

[@NoahSidney]

Someone didn’t watch the video 🤦‍♂️ tons of evidence lol

[@adisharr]

@@NoahSidney Where is this 'evidence' you're talking about?

[@doubleromans4916]

@@adisharr no evidence? You just made yourself sound like a complete fool with that one.

[@charlesgriffith7166]

Nope. None of what he said proves any god had anything to do with any of it. All he did was confirm he BELIEVES that. He need not do anything more to convince me HE BELIEVES THAT. I believe he believes it.
Now since that's been established let's get to the part of proving God (any god) did it.

[@whismanlift]

you cannot literally prove god. prove to me that george washington really was a real human who became president?

[@CuzCan1]

Did you listen to the first 5 minutes of the video? He says that he can’t prove Gods existence because it’s not possible, but he can provide evidence for his existence which is what he did.

[@charlesgriffith7166]

@@CuzCan1 He provided no such EVIDENCE of gods existence

[@Blu2D]

@@charlesgriffith7166 he provided a ton. if you can tell me what was before the big bang, the origin of the cell, where we get morals from and why is your morals better than my morals, explain love, explain why we have order and design on this earth and it just happened by chance ill listen to what you gotta say. but since you have nothing to say except that hes false you are better off not saying anything at all.

[@charlesgriffith7166]

@@Blu2D okay, I'm not the one making CLAIMS other than, I'm simply not convinced there's a God or God's of any kind. Therefore it's not on me to offer explinations to prove there isn't a god. To PROVE god had nothing in it. My stance is I'm not convinced. Therefore burden of proof doesn't rest on me. Burden of proof rests on the one making the claims there is a God. That God is the reason us and everything are here.
The Bible is nothing but a book of CLAIMS. It proves absolutely nothing. Just because you and whoever else BELIEVE it to be true, doesn't make it true. Doesn't make it FACT. It doesn't matter whether or not someone else comes up with another explanation other than God. Still doesn't take away from the FACT you can't prove it was god. And that's what the actual issue is here. Feel free to poke your holes in whatever other theories. But there's still the part of you proving your god did it.

[@QuantumStellar]

KJV bible codes prove god

[@PatientPerspective]

No it doesn't. It's confirmation bias. That's the last if not irrelevant way to prove the existence of God if we are assuming God or a creator exist apart from theists varied religious beliefs and belief systems. It turns into circular reasoning.

[@QuantumStellar]

how would you know? have you even looked into it (no, beccuse you are ignorant)@@PatientPerspective

[@PatientPerspective]

@@QuantumStellar Okaye. I'm just pointing out the fact using the Bible is subjective and turns into circular reasoning and confirmation bias. You know how many theists religions there are???
It's not my character to argue and call names. So you'll get none of that from me. How does the Bible prove God exists to any person who doesn't even know what it is?

[@QuantumStellar]

the number sequences are so complex, not even a computer can duplicate them. only GOD could have put those in there. by not knowing this, you are literally ignorant. its not name calling, its just bluntly obvious.@@PatientPerspective

[@QuantumStellar]

@@PatientPerspective th-cam.com/video/Aye8q9tIrws/w-d-xo.html

[@Divinecter]

I love Cliff but he really doesn’t prove God here…

[@Jim-yh5uj]

He said he cant prove he exists

[@VainFriggus]

Like he said multiple times in the video, “There is no way I can prove God, it’s impossible”

[@andrewcothran8377]

A God of probabilities is no God at all

[@VainFriggus]

Why

[@adisharr]

He's completely wrong about the eye and this has been refuted over and over. It has been shown that it can evolve in progressive complexity. He's also wrong on morality. Our morals were derived from the need to work together to achieve common goals to benefit society as a whole.

[@YeshuaisKing7777]

Why keep disabled people in society since they only consume ressources and can't work ?

[@YeshuaisKing7777]

And Hitler killed Jews to benefit society as a whole so that doesn't make it good. Slaves were enslaved to benefit society as a whole...

[@domcruise274]

Yeah but the morals can change at any time that’s the point. And it’s impossible to live a life with constant changing morals. In one society peace and love is moral but the next day if this society decides that certain people are going to destroy the “common goals” and they need to be eradicated or else society will fail, that is equally moral to eradicate them.

[@Hey_dude5133]

Bro just stop the non sense 😂 non life doesn’t just create this very specific and complex cell/eye/body that runs so perfect

[@Hey_dude5133]

Also about morals , if you were a girl and decided to have a baby , once that baby is born or even in your belly it doesn’t take time for society to realize they shouldn’t hurt that baby , the instant it’s born you also instantly know to not hurt it , that doesn’t take the community realizing they came to an idea of not hurting it

[@KRYPTOMATIK.mp3]

he just repeats the same point 11 times and ignores the questions he can't answer

[@calledtowin147]

He gave him eleven reasons to believe...but he wasn't seeking an answer just some smart Alec comment without giving one response of his own.

[@JesuS0nOfGod]

So what the universe was created out of nothing and nowhere from a big bang of nothing and nowhere and no reason

[@KRYPTOMATIK.mp3]

@@JesuS0nOfGod so the most obvious answer to that uncertainty to you is just a big ahh dude? that's a bit of a stretch no?

[@theironknight597]

​@JesuS0nOfGod You believe god created the universe out of nothing.

[@xchixchi3141]

@@theironknight597better then chance my guy

[@frang2023]

This guy falls in many fallacies

[@Redswin77]

?

[@TestRunAcc]

Name one?

[@PatientPerspective]

A lot of them

[@PatientPerspective]

1. God of the gaps and avoiding the question by appeal to ignorance
2. Jumping to conclusions.
3. Cum Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc Assuming correlation is causation: I see a design therefore there must be a designer. It also presents a black and white fallacy in which the third option is not considered such as those part of life that aren't designed (comments. Seizures, genetic conditions. Cancers)
4. 4.35. He completely lost us. He can't articulate his point.
5. A rational mind comes from a rational being... is another. Its subjective reasoning since rationality differs from person to person. 7:58. "It's ludicrous to believe..." doesn't prove anything. It just says it doesn't line up with his personal train of thinking and bias.
7. Appeal to authority is another. He also doesn't understand evolution so his support is weak if not irrelevant.
8. Also. Why can't a creator create a chaotic universe? Creator doesn't mean a designer.
9. And the historical evidence of Jesus doesn't prove supernatural claims. The existence of the pantheon doesn't mean the gods existed.
Plus. If a resurrection is possible science would have eaten it up. And Christianity wouldn't be based on faith but knowledge.

[@PatientPerspective]

​@@TestRunAccNothing inherently wrong with logical fallacies especially when Christianity is based on faith not objective reasoning. Most Christians believe based on personal experiences (thereby appealing to anecdotal evidence and confirmation bias), intuition, and god of the gaps. It's subjective. The Bible says blessed are those who believe without seeing. So...

[@joststrgar6918]

Bro cooked nothing💀💀

[@Higherpower13]

Ok

[@Enclave-zk2fi]

Delete your comment

[@Shadow_GlitchyEdits]

To you

[@Shadow_GlitchyEdits]

You're just saying that because you didn't understand or didn't care

[@VainFriggus]

Ok refute the arguments then

[@jasmatchett8771]

So his evidence is that he doesn't actually know anything...

[@SparrowWatt]

Yeah

[@VainFriggus]

Well like he said, there is no way to prove God. He just has all these evidences that point towards the likeliness of God

[@jasmatchett8771]

@VainFriggus exactly as I said, he doesn't really know anything

[@beatsbyromeb]

@@jasmatchett8771he himself has admitted that. I feel like he knows that there is a possibility that God does not exist. However, there is a substantial amount of evidence, that he’s given, to show the evidence that God does exist. He’s not saying “there is undoubtedly, 100% a God”. He’s saying that there is a bigger chance that God does exist, than if he didn’t. I don’t know if I worded that last sentence right, so I hope you understood it.
This was just my interpretation though. You’re entitled to your opinion.

[@tooomuchsausedrippen9720]

@@jasmatchett8771jus because YOU don’t believe does not mean it’s not true