Introducing Udio, an AI platform enabling anyone to create extraordinary music in seconds. Check us out at udio.com Twitter: @udiomusic Instagram: udiomusic TikTok: @udiomusic
it's very rare that this video only has 238 likes after 10 days. of course this kind of tools are going to revolutionize the music industry. Impressive.
Mind-blowing. As a musician and songwriter hobbyist, this is afront to decades of practice and experimentation. Then again, it could be an amazing tool to use to create immediate "sound canvases" to use for original melodies and singing. Who knows. I agree with the other commenters who have pointed out that the singer for Irvin's birthday song sounds way too close to John Legend for it to be OK. The motown song sounds like Stevie Wonder. These artists won't be happy with sound-alike productions.
@@bordeelcontroleur Sounding close is different than sounding alike. An artist can prevent someone from using their likeness. If 9 out of 10 think John Legend is singing then I'm sure he'd be able to stop them. I'm not a lawyer though, so we'll both find out as this tech evolves.
That's what I'll use it for from time to time - as a "sound canvas" as you said. The thought of just producing music and releasing it without any kind of effort put into it is just off pudding in almost every way to me.
@@bordeelcontroleur The difference is there was a lot of effort and time to get where they got. This is just typing in prompts. If all music starts to become derived in this way, then eventually they'll have no new music to draw from, and it will just cannibalize itself. Not saying that's going to happen soon. But I think it's important to try to create unique, human developed musical language. This could be a great tool in that pursuit, but I think it shouldn't be abused.
Y'all are some witches!! LOL!! This is scary good!! Please make a way for us to use our own vocal melodies!! That and stems will win you the race!! Though you're off to a great start on day one. Suno finally has some competition!!
A lot of people can sound like John Legend. There's nothing all that distinctive about his voice and it's easy to imitate. Jamie Foxx does a good impression of John Legend.
What if I generate music while I am not subscribed? Who owns it? What if I generate music while I am not subscribed, and after 5 minutes I subscribed? Who owns it? What if I generate music while I subscribed? Who owns it? What if I generate music while I am subscribed and forget to pay my subscription for the next month?? Who owns it? Do I need to give credits even when I'm in Paid plan? What if I generate music while I am not subscribed, but I don't want to give credits, but I didn't know that I need to give credits, then later I noticed that I realized if you're a free user, you need to give credits, can I subscribe so that I can have the right not to give credits?
Heh, lots of questions! Basically, you always own your music. However, you need to provide attribution (credit to Udio) for any songs you create while not on a paid plan. There are no retroactive options re attribution.
Might be exiting for people in the beginning but this is hell for everybody both music lover and artists. Also the lawsuits are just around the corner.
@@jasondads9509 Because the mystery and magic of music is gone. Music will not be exiting anymore. Just wait until you used it for a time. Maybe after 1 week its gone😄
@@jasondads9509because those people value music made by a human with “soul” and they’re afraid to end up liking something made by ai without realizing it. These people put human creativity on such an elevated, almost divine level, so when robots are almost able to replicate it on a mass scale I imagine they feel less special. There’s also the legal and ethical concerns but we know that already.
Psshh… freakin garbage… it wouldn’t even make my account after I followed its instructions to the letter. I’ll just keep enjoying what other people make, because it doesn’t look like I will be making anything. It says create account with email. I put in my email. It sent a link. Kept going right back to the start. When something that simple cannot be accomplished… leaves a pretty bad first impression. Garbage.
Probably. Really disappointing to learn Common was part of this. Anyway . . . Artists, from here on out, let’s go on a modified data strike that should make everyone, and I do mean everyone, happy. CREATE NOTHING NEW. Until we are adequately protected, let’s take remix culture to its most extreme ends. The pro-AI “art” community has told us repeatedly that there is no such thing as originality, everything is derivative, etc. They clearly believe we’ve reached the limits of human creativity and somehow feel qualified to tell us that art has become “stagnant.” (Never mind that these art whisperers include the same tech moguls who have fed the masses mediocre art through algorithms for decades.) Let’s not fight this strange alliance between billionaire tech moguls who are somehow suddenly democratizers and everyday people who believe themselves to be decent (or even progressive) but have no qualms about stealing from artists, including the majority of whom are poor or middle class. Let’s instead carry out their self-serving logic to its ridiculous end. Let’s turn the other cheek by doing what they’ve told us to do so many times: Be closer to their definition of “creative” and “adapt” as they have. Until artists are adequately protected and AI companies and grifters cannot scrape copyrighted works without artists’ consent and without crediting and fairly compensating each artist, stop feeding the machine. Use your advantage, which is skill. Make friends with and collaborate with other human artists who are against us being exploited to train generative AI. (This may be the time when you find out who your real friends are. Collective suffering brings oppressed people together. Unite.) Create remixes of each others’ works. Remix the remixes, too. And so on. These will be protected by copyright while AI outputs are not. Your skill will enable you to do this somewhat efficiently, and you will be less attached to these creations than you would be to the work you “dared” to call original. That said, never stop working on art that you truly love even if you don’t release it or only share it in special circumstances where the cost-benefit analysis makes sense. If you like creating original art, this kind of data strike means you may have to do some work you do not love (derivative work) but it will still be art (you will still probably like and enjoy it) and not a day job you hate. If you want to use AI (as you are constantly told you should) to ensure that you stay on top of the tech or to reduce the amount of original, human work available for corporations to scrape (and thereby contribute to the logical consequences of AI feeding itself its own ****), there are ethical models. (See Fairly Trained.) Also, keep pressuring your elected representatives to end to this madness.
Hey, if I tried Udio in its beta phase and downloaded some generated songs, now that it has a subscription model and I can pay to have a commercial use license for the generated songs, that only applies to those that would be created later or also include the previous ones ? 🤔??????
Artists, from here on out, let’s go on a modified data strike that should make everyone, and I do mean everyone, happy. CREATE NOTHING NEW. Until we are adequately protected, let’s take remix culture to its most extreme ends. The pro-AI “art” community has told us repeatedly that there is no such thing as originality, everything is derivative, etc. They clearly believe we’ve reached the limits of human creativity and somehow feel qualified to tell us that art has become “stagnant.” (Never mind that these art whisperers include the same tech moguls who have fed the masses mediocre art through algorithms for decades.) Let’s not fight this strange alliance between billionaire tech moguls who are somehow suddenly democratizers and everyday people who believe themselves to be decent (or even progressive) but have no qualms about stealing from artists, including the majority of whom are poor or middle class. Let’s instead carry out their self-serving logic to its ridiculous end. Let’s turn the other cheek by doing what they’ve told us to do so many times: Be closer to their definition of “creative” and “adapt” as they have. Until artists are adequately protected and AI companies and grifters cannot scrape copyrighted works without artists’ consent and without crediting and fairly compensating each artist, stop feeding the machine. Use your advantage, which is skill. Make friends with and collaborate with other human artists who are against us being exploited to train generative AI. (This may be the time when you find out who your real friends are. Collective suffering brings oppressed people together. Unite.) Create remixes of each others’ works. Remix the remixes, too. And so on. These will be protected by copyright while AI outputs are not. Your skill will enable you to do this somewhat efficiently, and you will be less attached to these creations than you would be to the work you “dared” to call original. That said, never stop working on art that you truly love even if you don’t release it or only share it in special circumstances where the cost-benefit analysis makes sense. If you like creating original art, this kind of data strike means you may have to do some work you do not love (derivative work) but it will still be art (you will still probably like and enjoy it) and not a day job you hate. If you want to use AI (as you are constantly told you should) to ensure that you stay on top of the tech or to reduce the amount of original, human work available for corporations to scrape (and thereby contribute to the logical consequences of AI feeding itself its own ****), there are ethical models. (See Fairly Trained.) Also, keep pressuring your elected representatives to end to this madness.
Okay... so I could see this being good for getting inspiration if you use it uniquely. The problem is that it's just turning art into factory work. People are going to exploit it as much as they can just to make money, and that's it. However, I think the tool, if used in good faith, could be used to help create very unique music. Don't just release what it spits out. Add your own layers of instruments, voice, harmonies; cut it up, downpitch it, mangle it, combine different songs in unique ways. Ah, but this takes time and thought, probably the opposite thing that it's marketed for.
This is not just another tool that will make artist better, like people keep saying. This is different! This is the first tool that can replace a lot of artists entirely. You are stealing and devaluing art and music as a whole. You are potentially destroying dreams and even making life less worth living for many. It is so difficult to make a living as a music producer already and now you are gonna make it almost impossible for most, thus destroying those dreams and making years of hard work and sacrifice meaningless. I hope I am wrong about this, but we can see signs of this happening already in other areas of ai "art" and it is beyond depressing. And on top of all of that: you are not even offering anything better, only stolen regurgitated ideas that are just delivered faster. I don't understand how you can do this and not be worried that you might be immeasurably damaging one the purest and most beautiful things we ever had as a species. Or maybe you just don't care ... Our art is our soul and you are essentially stealing it and wiping your behind with it.
This is amazing, I would love to see some sort of flowchart GUI in future so we can have better control over extended songs and allow us to repeat melodies with different words then it would be almost perfect!
Впечатляет, впечатляет... Однако может ли этот ИИ сгенерировать «Дымок но это кислотная гиперпоп-опера в трёх действиях, с антрактом и sped up неофолк-репризой»?
STEMS! DAW integration. More control over song format. Have the ability to upload original tracks to create a reference vocal or create a track from a reference vocal. Do that and it's GAME OVER! (Oh, and make it affordable)
How do the video downloads work? Mine says "Try again later. Video is being generated." which is confusing. Do they just take a long time to generate? Does every song automatically get a video generated?
hola, estoy encantado , me gustaría saber como poner siempre la misma voz . hello, I am delighted , I would like to know how to always put the same voice .
@@graph1ks "work" ai bruhs can go cry in a corner when this gets shut down. They clearly are ripping off artists using samples that are tied together and mixed by the ai. this is clearly not legal. Universal will shut this down. we can clearly hear john legend's voice. Universal music group currently are in the process of shutting down Anthropic, Udio will be next. You can't stop Universal Music Group, most powerful company in america pretty much, they own Taylor Swift ffs. As a musician, i sit here with my bags of popcorn watching the ai burn. there's like 20 law suits going on right now.
@@Maplefoxx-vl2ew I'm clearly not going to defend AI producing 100% identifiable and blatant copies of artists voices etc. It should be noted though that UMG has heavily invested itself into TH-cams music AI project Lyria. They don't lobby for AI to go away, but to protect artists visual and vocal identity. Which i'm fully ok with. Udio clearly has some bad days, considering the recend incidents surrounding their AI creations.
This is amazing software 😍 The Udio robots made an amine intro style song for me it’s awesome 💥 I just uploaded it to my TH-cam channel if anyone wants to listen it’s really good ❤️
honestly, I never thought I would go back to music, I left 2018, to do graphic design cuz it had an income, Suno AI gave me hope, I was not that good , though I have 18k followers on Facebook, text to music gave hope that I would one day sound how I want my music to sound, it's disheartening to love something but can't do it because you need some technical background to make certain sounds and vibes, but with text to music, I must say, this is what I have been looking for, I used band in a box before for live instruments but now this, this exactly what we need, a sampler, that you can just whatever you need and add it to your production and sound exactly like your favourite producer instantly , thank you Udio, the best sounding quality text to music by far......
“It’s disheartening to love something but you CAN’T do it because of some technical background.” “I would love to make music but I’m too talentless to learn an instrument. Give me instant gratification instead!” You still haven’t gone back to music, you’re just a hack.
Using copyrighted music to train their AI without consent and forcing arbitration when using their service are just two of the things that are scummy about this company and industry😁😁
![James Fridman Photoshop Trolls [2020]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/5CKFV0vU2WY/mqdefault.jpg)
This is the ChatGPT moment for the Music Industry... It's gonna be wild
@@bordeelcontroleuryou wrong, the companies that run this AI music technology, will be the industry LOL
@@bordeelcontroleur yeah lmao
The fact that this is possible AND only in its infancy is both mind blowing and terrifying. We are so not ready....
Im ready
Nah for real. the compositional value of a tool like this, even in this nascent form, is infinite. Writer's / producer's block is GONE.
NOT READY ... ihr werdet eh schon genug reizuberflutet.
Im more than ready, Im done :D
Your servers are dooooown bro!! Loving the service and can't wait for stem separation and song/melody referencing!
it's very rare that this video only has 238 likes after 10 days.
of course this kind of tools are going to revolutionize the music industry. Impressive.
No, this is shit.
This is the future. As a producer, my mind is completely blown. Can't wait to see what the future holds!
Mind-blowing. As a musician and songwriter hobbyist, this is afront to decades of practice and experimentation. Then again, it could be an amazing tool to use to create immediate "sound canvases" to use for original melodies and singing. Who knows. I agree with the other commenters who have pointed out that the singer for Irvin's birthday song sounds way too close to John Legend for it to be OK. The motown song sounds like Stevie Wonder. These artists won't be happy with sound-alike productions.
@@bordeelcontroleur Sounding close is different than sounding alike. An artist can prevent someone from using their likeness. If 9 out of 10 think John Legend is singing then I'm sure he'd be able to stop them. I'm not a lawyer though, so we'll both find out as this tech evolves.
That's what I'll use it for from time to time - as a "sound canvas" as you said. The thought of just producing music and releasing it without any kind of effort put into it is just off pudding in almost every way to me.
@@bordeelcontroleur The difference is there was a lot of effort and time to get where they got. This is just typing in prompts. If all music starts to become derived in this way, then eventually they'll have no new music to draw from, and it will just cannibalize itself. Not saying that's going to happen soon. But I think it's important to try to create unique, human developed musical language. This could be a great tool in that pursuit, but I think it shouldn't be abused.
These songs are the “AI paperclips” experts were warning us about.
Y'all are some witches!! LOL!! This is scary good!! Please make a way for us to use our own vocal melodies!! That and stems will win you the race!! Though you're off to a great start on day one. Suno finally has some competition!!
what are the big differences between this and suno
Stunning! As a musician. This is stunning! I wonder where would be its limit. Better to try it asap
This both exciting and frightening at the same time - but just imagine all the possiblities
0:20 this is CLEARLY John Legends voice.
Because it’s a plagiarism machine. So much overfit but devs don’t seem to have the culture to notice it. They’ll run unto huge legal issues.
Created a song and they decided that Robert Sylvester needed to make a cameo.😆
@@johndoe_1984 good, anyone doing this type of thing deserves to get shut down, its clearly sampling and using ai to piece it together
A lot of people can sound like John Legend. There's nothing all that distinctive about his voice and it's easy to imitate. Jamie Foxx does a good impression of John Legend.
What if I generate music while I am not subscribed? Who owns it?
What if I generate music while I am not subscribed, and after 5 minutes I subscribed? Who owns it?
What if I generate music while I subscribed? Who owns it?
What if I generate music while I am subscribed and forget to pay my subscription for the next month?? Who owns it?
Do I need to give credits even when I'm in Paid plan?
What if I generate music while I am not subscribed, but I don't want to give credits, but I didn't know that I need to give credits, then later I noticed that I realized if you're a free user, you need to give credits, can I subscribe so that I can have the right not to give credits?
Heh, lots of questions! Basically, you always own your music. However, you need to provide attribution (credit to Udio) for any songs you create while not on a paid plan. There are no retroactive options re attribution.
Might be exiting for people in the beginning but this is hell for everybody both music lover and artists. Also the lawsuits are just around the corner.
Why music lovers?
@@jasondads9509 Because the mystery and magic of music is gone. Music will not be exiting anymore. Just wait until you used it for a time. Maybe after 1 week its gone😄
@@jasondads9509because those people value music made by a human with “soul” and they’re afraid to end up liking something made by ai without realizing it. These people put human creativity on such an elevated, almost divine level, so when robots are almost able to replicate it on a mass scale I imagine they feel less special. There’s also the legal and ethical concerns but we know that already.
Psshh… freakin garbage… it wouldn’t even make my account after I followed its instructions to the letter. I’ll just keep enjoying what other people make, because it doesn’t look like I will be making anything. It says create account with email. I put in my email. It sent a link. Kept going right back to the start. When something that simple cannot be accomplished… leaves a pretty bad first impression. Garbage.
Questions, if I become a STANDART UDIO subscriber, can I publish on TH-cam or can only PRO subscribers do this?
yo the songs on the site (and the song i generated) sound REALLY good. this is kind of crazy.
What's with having to attribute to udio even if you pay? It's like paying for keeping a watermark.
Read the Contract better. I understood that only free songs need to be credited to Udio, paying ones are exempt from the obligation.
@@HappyIdeasHappen2023 It's not about reading it better, it's that they changed it, they said so on their site. You're too late to this.
84th SUB RIGHT HERE!
Congratulations i'm subs #991 😂😂
What songs are going into training this? Are my songs being used to train the AI that replaces me???
Probably. Really disappointing to learn Common was part of this. Anyway . . . Artists, from here on out, let’s go on a modified data strike that should make everyone, and I do mean everyone, happy. CREATE NOTHING NEW. Until we are adequately protected, let’s take remix culture to its most extreme ends. The pro-AI “art” community has told us repeatedly that there is no such thing as originality, everything is derivative, etc. They clearly believe we’ve reached the limits of human creativity and somehow feel qualified to tell us that art has become “stagnant.” (Never mind that these art whisperers include the same tech moguls who have fed the masses mediocre art through algorithms for decades.) Let’s not fight this strange alliance between billionaire tech moguls who are somehow suddenly democratizers and everyday people who believe themselves to be decent (or even progressive) but have no qualms about stealing from artists, including the majority of whom are poor or middle class. Let’s instead carry out their self-serving logic to its ridiculous end. Let’s turn the other cheek by doing what they’ve told us to do so many times: Be closer to their definition of “creative” and “adapt” as they have. Until artists are adequately protected and AI companies and grifters cannot scrape copyrighted works without artists’ consent and without crediting and fairly compensating each artist, stop feeding the machine. Use your advantage, which is skill. Make friends with and collaborate with other human artists who are against us being exploited to train generative AI. (This may be the time when you find out who your real friends are. Collective suffering brings oppressed people together. Unite.) Create remixes of each others’ works. Remix the remixes, too. And so on. These will be protected by copyright while AI outputs are not. Your skill will enable you to do this somewhat efficiently, and you will be less attached to these creations than you would be to the work you “dared” to call original. That said, never stop working on art that you truly love even if you don’t release it or only share it in special circumstances where the cost-benefit analysis makes sense. If you like creating original art, this kind of data strike means you may have to do some work you do not love (derivative work) but it will still be art (you will still probably like and enjoy it) and not a day job you hate. If you want to use AI (as you are constantly told you should) to ensure that you stay on top of the tech or to reduce the amount of original, human work available for corporations to scrape (and thereby contribute to the logical consequences of AI feeding itself its own ****), there are ethical models. (See Fairly Trained.) Also, keep pressuring your elected representatives to end to this madness.
Probably not but it will when you gain more notoriety
Hey, if I tried Udio in its beta phase and downloaded some generated songs, now that it has a subscription model and I can pay to have a commercial use license for the generated songs, that only applies to those that would be created later or also include the previous ones ? 🤔??????
Artists, from here on out, let’s go on a modified data strike that should make everyone, and I do mean everyone, happy. CREATE NOTHING NEW. Until we are adequately protected, let’s take remix culture to its most extreme ends. The pro-AI “art” community has told us repeatedly that there is no such thing as originality, everything is derivative, etc. They clearly believe we’ve reached the limits of human creativity and somehow feel qualified to tell us that art has become “stagnant.” (Never mind that these art whisperers include the same tech moguls who have fed the masses mediocre art through algorithms for decades.) Let’s not fight this strange alliance between billionaire tech moguls who are somehow suddenly democratizers and everyday people who believe themselves to be decent (or even progressive) but have no qualms about stealing from artists, including the majority of whom are poor or middle class. Let’s instead carry out their self-serving logic to its ridiculous end. Let’s turn the other cheek by doing what they’ve told us to do so many times: Be closer to their definition of “creative” and “adapt” as they have. Until artists are adequately protected and AI companies and grifters cannot scrape copyrighted works without artists’ consent and without crediting and fairly compensating each artist, stop feeding the machine. Use your advantage, which is skill. Make friends with and collaborate with other human artists who are against us being exploited to train generative AI. (This may be the time when you find out who your real friends are. Collective suffering brings oppressed people together. Unite.) Create remixes of each others’ works. Remix the remixes, too. And so on. These will be protected by copyright while AI outputs are not. Your skill will enable you to do this somewhat efficiently, and you will be less attached to these creations than you would be to the work you “dared” to call original. That said, never stop working on art that you truly love even if you don’t release it or only share it in special circumstances where the cost-benefit analysis makes sense. If you like creating original art, this kind of data strike means you may have to do some work you do not love (derivative work) but it will still be art (you will still probably like and enjoy it) and not a day job you hate. If you want to use AI (as you are constantly told you should) to ensure that you stay on top of the tech or to reduce the amount of original, human work available for corporations to scrape (and thereby contribute to the logical consequences of AI feeding itself its own ****), there are ethical models. (See Fairly Trained.) Also, keep pressuring your elected representatives to end to this madness.
uhm, I don't believe you'll start the revolution here, buddy 😅
oh! I wanna see what come next, this is so exited!
Interesting times we live in. It's a new tool for artists. Let's embrace it.
Which artists did you train your AI on?
All of them
@@jasondads9509 did they have any permission from them?
@@Tory8erno and that’s gonna be a big issue
You dont need permission, voice is just a frequency, you dont own it
@@-schattenpflanze-3755 yeah and laws are just scribbles on paper
This sucks. Also it’s not “our music” or “your music”. It’s AI music and its depressing.
I was the #30 sub!
I have a question … how can you post this on youtube
Is it free? Or having a payment plans of Udio Ai Music?
Was Udio Ai Music available on Discord?
You can get a few generations/exensions per day.
I was the legendary 107th sub, here before a million!
Okay... so I could see this being good for getting inspiration if you use it uniquely. The problem is that it's just turning art into factory work. People are going to exploit it as much as they can just to make money, and that's it. However, I think the tool, if used in good faith, could be used to help create very unique music. Don't just release what it spits out. Add your own layers of instruments, voice, harmonies; cut it up, downpitch it, mangle it, combine different songs in unique ways. Ah, but this takes time and thought, probably the opposite thing that it's marketed for.
It's cursing? What the.
This is not just another tool that will make artist better, like people keep saying. This is different! This is the first tool that can replace a lot of artists entirely. You are stealing and devaluing art and music as a whole. You are potentially destroying dreams and even making life less worth living for many. It is so difficult to make a living as a music producer already and now you are gonna make it almost impossible for most, thus destroying those dreams and making years of hard work and sacrifice meaningless. I hope I am wrong about this, but we can see signs of this happening already in other areas of ai "art" and it is beyond depressing. And on top of all of that: you are not even offering anything better, only stolen regurgitated ideas that are just delivered faster. I don't understand how you can do this and not be worried that you might be immeasurably damaging one the purest and most beautiful things we ever had as a species. Or maybe you just don't care ... Our art is our soul and you are essentially stealing it and wiping your behind with it.
This will be something big 🦦
This is amazing, I would love to see some sort of flowchart GUI in future so we can have better control over extended songs and allow us to repeat melodies with different words then it would be almost perfect!
This is the oficial channel?
Впечатляет, впечатляет... Однако может ли этот ИИ сгенерировать «Дымок но это кислотная гиперпоп-опера в трёх действиях, с антрактом и sped up неофолк-репризой»?
Сможет, даже в оперном варианте в стиле rnb клуб хаус с ноткой альтернативы и репера.
Lets go!
STEMS! DAW integration. More control over song format. Have the ability to upload original tracks to create a reference vocal or create a track from a reference vocal. Do that and it's GAME OVER! (Oh, and make it affordable)
I really thought this kind of thing was impossible and only humans could make art like this, but clearly I was mistaken.
I was #18 sub.
Guys listen to me I’m Iguana Guy I make positive music on there my favorite song I made is “Our rock”
I love prompting problematic lyrics and subjects with this
#35 sub!
thank you #udio! this is Wild and Crazy! It can even create music in Tagalog. OMG! This is the future! Goodbye American idol !
insane
this has blown up in AI community on X, and now TH-cam has fewer than 1k views
How do the video downloads work? Mine says "Try again later. Video is being generated." which is confusing. Do they just take a long time to generate? Does every song automatically get a video generated?
I was told that making music was a distinctly human enterprise. I guess not anymore. This is WILD.
hola, estoy encantado , me gustaría saber como poner siempre la misma voz . hello, I am delighted , I would like to know how to always put the same voice .
I made #4 comment (Just scroll down and see my first comment)
Please showcase some of your favourite sfw songs ❤
Gonna be a wild journey. Sattle up and join me on my ride if you want :D
No I don’t want to listen to your low-effort generated « music »
@@johndoe_1984 Thanks for the feedback. You inspire me to work harder.
@@graph1ks "work" ai bruhs can go cry in a corner when this gets shut down. They clearly are ripping off artists using samples that are tied together and mixed by the ai. this is clearly not legal. Universal will shut this down. we can clearly hear john legend's voice. Universal music group currently are in the process of shutting down Anthropic, Udio will be next. You can't stop Universal Music Group, most powerful company in america pretty much, they own Taylor Swift ffs. As a musician, i sit here with my bags of popcorn watching the ai burn. there's like 20 law suits going on right now.
@@Maplefoxx-vl2ew I'm clearly not going to defend AI producing 100% identifiable and blatant copies of artists voices etc.
It should be noted though that UMG has heavily invested itself into TH-cams music AI project Lyria. They don't lobby for AI to go away, but to protect artists visual and vocal identity. Which i'm fully ok with.
Udio clearly has some bad days, considering the recend incidents surrounding their AI creations.
Udio stinks.
any discount code?
The Human Age is over
ferramenta poderosíssima!👋👋👋🙌
This is amazing software 😍 The Udio robots made an amine intro style song for me it’s awesome 💥 I just uploaded it to my TH-cam channel if anyone wants to listen it’s really good ❤️
No I don’t want to listen to your low-effort generated crap
@@johndoe_1984 no problem next customer please
THIS IS THE BEST EVER, THANK YOU
"enabling anyone to create extraordinary music in seconds"
You mean steal others people music in seconds? I'm so over this AI hype shit.
HOOOLY SHEET AMIGO
Amazing
🤠
honestly, I never thought I would go back to music, I left 2018, to do graphic design cuz it had an income, Suno AI gave me hope, I was not that good , though I have 18k followers on Facebook, text to music gave hope that I would one day sound how I want my music to sound, it's disheartening to love something but can't do it because you need some technical background to make certain sounds and vibes, but with text to music, I must say, this is what I have been looking for, I used band in a box before for live instruments but now this, this exactly what we need, a sampler, that you can just whatever you need and add it to your production and sound exactly like your favourite producer instantly , thank you Udio, the best sounding quality text to music by far......
“It’s disheartening to love something but you CAN’T do it because of some technical background.”
“I would love to make music but I’m too talentless to learn an instrument. Give me instant gratification instead!”
You still haven’t gone back to music, you’re just a hack.
lol we are far from that speed, it's more like 20 minutes for 33 seconds currently...
Yup
Volt mix?
👍
Using copyrighted music to train their AI without consent and forcing arbitration when using their service are just two of the things that are scummy about this company and industry😁😁