Anyone one who has any basic understanding of the bible knows the whore of babylon is clearly the city of Tyre. Also the city of Tyre is clearly Atlantis if anyone does any basic "dot connection."
Three simple "dot connections" that prove that you have no basic understanding of the bible - or who mystery Babylon was. ⚪Tyre was not in a 'marriage covenant' with the Father and therefore couldn't play the prostitute - Jerusalem was and held the only Temple to YHWH. ⚪The city where our Lord was slain was not Tyre, it was Jerusalem. ⚪The city is clothed in fine linen, purple and scarlet which goes back all the way to Lev./Duet. ordinances.
@@ChristCenteredEschatology Please provide evidence Christ was crucified in what is symbolically referred to as the whore of Babylon..."The great city" is probably Rome but Rome is not the whore of Babylon.
@@Tokyo1985 1-(Isaiah 23:17)...verse references revelation 17:2 in St. Ignatius Bible. 2-The city where lord was slain has nothing to do with whore of babylon, kind of...but not in the direct way your referring to. 3-Tyre was famous for its purple dye en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tyrian_purple
The New Testament assumes that the return of Christ is imminent. This imminent expectation is made even more precise to Jesus and the apostles in several places in the Gospels and the apostolic letters: Truly, I say to you, there are some standing here who will not taste death until they see the Son of Man coming in his kingdom (Matthew 16:28). When his disciples asked when the end of the age would be (cf. Matthew 24:3), Jesus replied: Truly, I say to you, this generation will not pass away until all these things have taken place (Matthew 24:34). The only possible interpretation that Jesus' own words allow is therefore that He was talking about the destruction of the temple that stood in Jerusalem at the time and which His disciples were looking at at that particular moment in history. The temple that Jesus spoke of was destroyed when Jerusalem fell to the Roman army in 70 AD. This is the only permissible interpretation of the prophecy in this chapter. The Great Tribulation ended with the destruction of the 2nd Temple in 70 AD. As Paul saw his generation as the generation upon whom the end of the ages had come: Now all these things happened to them as an example, and were written as a warning to us, upon whom the ends of the ages have come - 1 Cor 10:11. After this he saw another angel coming down from heaven, having great power, and the earth shining with his glory. And he cried with a loud voice, "Fallen, fallen is Babylon the great!" Revelation 18:1-2. The conquest of Jerusalem by the Romans in 70 AD during the Jewish War was an important event in the history of the Jewish people. The Jerusalem Temple was destroyed, its cult objects were captured and later carried in the triumphal procession in Rome. For the Romans, the capture of Jerusalem meant the strategic triumph over Judea, which was completed with the capture of the palace fortress of Masada in 73 or 74. The Whore of Babylon (Jerusalem) was completely destroyed! Blessings
I really hope that you will take up next the book "Problems With Preterism." It is just chock full of juicy targets. Also, it is endorsed by Sam Frost., LoL
So the Zealots put and end to sacrifice and offering? When Did they do this? Wasn't the Caesar sacrifices part the treaty between the Jews and Rome? "At the same time Eleazar, the son of Ananias the high priest, a very bold youth, who was at that time governor of the temple, persuaded those that officiated in the Divine service to receive no gift or sacrifice for any foreigner. And *this was the true beginning of our war with the Romans;"* (Josephus. Wars of the Jew 2.17.2) I wonder if any Old Testament prophet predated such a thing.
@@ophiuchus9071 The covenant that was confirmed or strengthened was the covenant between the Jews and Rome, which included the sacrifices and obligations on behalf of Caesar. They were stopped in the middle of the 70th week, just like Daniel said. it is not a coincidence that everything Daniel predict came true ight on time, according to the text. Daniel was not a false prophet who wrongly predicted 490 years until the destruction of the second temple instead of 530 or so, Do not add to the word of God.
@@ophiuchus9071Sorry, but if you think the anointed one (the second anointed one) who is cut off and is no more was Jesus, then you have no choice but to add approximately 40 years to Daniel's prophecy, which he did not state in the text. We don't get to edit God's word so that it fits our opinion.
Thank You For Video
🐝🐝🐝
Anyone one who has any basic understanding of the bible knows the whore of babylon is clearly the city of Tyre. Also the city of Tyre is clearly Atlantis if anyone does any basic "dot connection."
If that is basic knowledge, then please provide your Biblical evidence and prove that Christ was crucified in Tyre.
Three simple "dot connections" that prove that you have no basic understanding of the bible - or who mystery Babylon was.
⚪Tyre was not in a 'marriage covenant' with the Father and therefore couldn't play the prostitute - Jerusalem was and held the only Temple to YHWH.
⚪The city where our Lord was slain was not Tyre, it was Jerusalem.
⚪The city is clothed in fine linen, purple and scarlet which goes back all the way to Lev./Duet. ordinances.
@@Tokyo1985 Amen. It is amazing how hard people will work to get around the clear teaching of the scriptures.
@@ChristCenteredEschatology Please provide evidence Christ was crucified in what is symbolically referred to as the whore of Babylon..."The great city" is probably Rome but Rome is not the whore of Babylon.
@@Tokyo1985 1-(Isaiah 23:17)...verse references revelation 17:2 in St. Ignatius Bible. 2-The city where lord was slain has nothing to do with whore of babylon, kind of...but not in the direct way your referring to. 3-Tyre was famous for its purple dye en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tyrian_purple
The New Testament assumes that the return of Christ is imminent. This imminent expectation is made even more precise to Jesus and the apostles in several places in the Gospels and the apostolic letters: Truly, I say to you, there are some standing here who will not taste death until they see the Son of Man coming in his kingdom (Matthew 16:28). When his disciples asked when the end of the age would be (cf. Matthew 24:3), Jesus replied: Truly, I say to you, this generation will not pass away until all these things have taken place (Matthew 24:34). The only possible interpretation that Jesus' own words allow is therefore that He was talking about the destruction of the temple that stood in Jerusalem at the time and which His disciples were looking at at that particular moment in history. The temple that Jesus spoke of was destroyed when Jerusalem fell to the Roman army in 70 AD. This is the only permissible interpretation of the prophecy in this chapter. The Great Tribulation ended with the destruction of the 2nd Temple in 70 AD. As Paul saw his generation as the generation upon whom the end of the ages had come: Now all these things happened to them as an example, and were written as a warning to us, upon whom the ends of the ages have come - 1 Cor 10:11. After this he saw another angel coming down from heaven, having great power, and the earth shining with his glory. And he cried with a loud voice, "Fallen, fallen is Babylon the great!" Revelation 18:1-2. The conquest of Jerusalem by the Romans in 70 AD during the Jewish War was an important event in the history of the Jewish people. The Jerusalem Temple was destroyed, its cult objects were captured and later carried in the triumphal procession in Rome. For the Romans, the capture of Jerusalem meant the strategic triumph over Judea, which was completed with the capture of the palace fortress of Masada in 73 or 74. The Whore of Babylon (Jerusalem) was completely destroyed! Blessings
I really hope that you will take up next the book "Problems With Preterism." It is just chock full of juicy targets. Also, it is endorsed by Sam Frost., LoL
So the Zealots put and end to sacrifice and offering? When Did they do this?
Wasn't the Caesar sacrifices part the treaty between the Jews and Rome?
"At the same time Eleazar, the son of Ananias the high priest, a very bold youth, who was at that time governor of the temple, persuaded those that officiated in the Divine service to receive no gift or sacrifice for any foreigner. And *this was the true beginning of our war with the Romans;"* (Josephus. Wars of the Jew 2.17.2)
I wonder if any Old Testament prophet predated such a thing.
@@ophiuchus9071 The covenant that was confirmed or strengthened was the covenant between the Jews and Rome, which included the sacrifices and obligations on behalf of Caesar. They were stopped in the middle of the 70th week, just like Daniel said. it is not a coincidence that everything Daniel predict came true ight on time, according to the text. Daniel was not a false prophet who wrongly predicted 490 years until the destruction of the second temple instead of 530 or so,
Do not add to the word of God.
@@ophiuchus9071Sorry, but if you think the anointed one (the second anointed one) who is cut off and is no more was Jesus, then you have no choice but to add approximately 40 years to Daniel's prophecy, which he did not state in the text.
We don't get to edit God's word so that it fits our opinion.