Very nice video and I'm going to link to it, with one caveat. Sorry that I must dis-agree on terminology... Yes a vacuum is formed but NOT because the gas 'imploded'. It's because a gas mixture (hydrogen and oxygen) that takes up 1866 cc (in gaseous form) converts to a liquid (water) that only takes up 1 cc of volume in liquid form. The gas did not implode, it exploded (violent expansion), then (if the 'explosion' was contained... didn't blow the container apart like your syringe experiment) a net vacuum forms because the gases have reformed into molecules that take up much less volume (a vacuum forms). There is ALWAYS an explosion first and THAT is the actual and only 'reaction' thus there is NO implosion. The vacuum forms as a secondary effect of the explosion and is not technically an 'implosion'. Here is a video that DOES show an implosion... If you separate the ExW portion of the HydrOxy (Brown's Gas) from the hydrogen and oxygen. th-cam.com/video/-9EmgSowldw/w-d-xo.html
@legogunguy001 - Bingo! You just won a, well, something or other. :-) The implosion portion of the video is incorrect. The vacuum suction occurs as the exploded gases (including steam) cool and condense.
its been done many times in labs around the would. when HHO turns back into water it takes up less space . still is a good vid ,nice to see it done at this level > 5 star stuff
This video reminds me of something I thought about a few years ago. Hydrogen and oxygen take up much more volume than the water they produce which suggests the reaction would create a partial vacuum. Yet the heat produced by the reaction should create an explosion (and it does) and that should create positive pressure. I never investigated the answer but now I'm thinking about it again. It would be useful to know if the piston would get sucked back in if it didn't go flying across the room.
incorrect, the only thing in that sealed container was two parts hydrogen to one part oxygen, that means air isn't "used up" because the reaction between hydrogen and oxygen just creates water (and energy) and is not like a regular combustion reaction. So yes you're right it's not an "implosion" it is in fact an explosion, however its the fact that the gasses are creating a liquid and no gas that the explosion creates a slight vacuum not because the air is "used up".
an explosion creates an presure and the heat from the explosion creates presure how can there be vacouum if you trust scool physic books? right! scool books are created to learn us stuff that the big idustries can make money because everybody thinks that tesla is a car and free energy is solar energy ! POOR WORLD proof: how long humans know about HHO? how long humans know about industrieal fuel? how much engins for industrial fuel are on our stupid planet ? too much how much engins for HHO are on our stupid planet ? maybe 10 - 20 how much patents for hho inventions on this planet? if there are some they are there becouse the industry want money if they have no more oil
i agree with dennis n steven......the explosion inside the chamber make temporal expansion...then when things begins to cool create a vacuum condition that sucks water.....if u put something in the nozzle during the explosion or implotion as u say.....u will see that something will fly..... i did the same things like u years ago...but with top lid just snap on type...n when the fire goes into the chamber.... it exlpode...n the top lid fly almost 7 meter up high....so it was an explotion not implode....
Dear Sir,I'm extremely grateful for the experiment uploaded and shown in youtube,titled""HHO Explosion and Implosion"-especially explosion!I would like to help you to prove that after the explosion occurs implosion.For the purpose you have to repeat the eperiment as the body of the syringe should be 5-6 or few times longer,so that after the explosion the piston shouldn't leave the syringe.Once it moves to the left to some point and stops,if vacuum occurs in the syringe,it would start moving backwards. It is extremely curious to what point it would go back in the opposite direction. If you do the experiment the video you can upload in youtube could be titled"HHO Explosion and Implosion-2". Thank you once again,with your experiment I have applied for a patent and I've already had a publication and I would like, if the suggested by myself experiment above occurs a successful one,to establish connection with you! Thank you very much!Regards!
Could it be that what we think we observed is not the whole story? Perhaps with a superior high-speed camera, things may become clearer. I am of the suspension that the water electrolyte mix may be acting as a heat sink. Whereas in the syringe, the hho is a Gass only volume. Hence, as the o2 and hydrogen rebond energy is released this along with the newly formed water. Causing an almost instantaneous steam reaction. However, in the electrolysis chamber, the present fluid absorbs the said energy..... just a theory I'm a mechanic, not a rocket surgeon.
4:40 And the 2009 random object laying around to be set on fire award goes to.... Surrounded by test equipment 3x over in some cases and then use the last of the last minute thoughts of things to burn on camera? LOL LOVE IT!
in both cases there is explosion. in the second case, the water enters through the tube into the reactor because the explosion consumed the entire oxygen Likewise, the explosion is heated inside of the reactor, and in cooling process the remaining gases are beginning to shrink and created a vacuum. (google translate)
like someone else stated. The explosion first created pressure that was looking to get out. the when the explosion was finished and everything was cooling down there was a vacuum. BUT also we have to consider that HHO molecules might take up more space than H2O water molecules, The HHO is converted to H20 vapor. Does room temp H2O vapor take up less space than room temp HHO? Maybe! We are taking 3 molecules and turning them into 1 molecule with 3 parts. So, I think you might be right.
No dude. You just instantly burned up all the gas that was in the tank, leaving a vacuum behind. It does look like a good way to create a vacuum quickly, if you can first vent the explosion! Nice work. I'm finally about to install on my vehicle!
Nitrogen was burnt up? I know what your thinking but the gas does not burn up as such, it simply combines with other gasses to form both gaseous and solid byproducts, take a gas formed by the separation of water through adding a few electrons, in recombination after the initial energy is used to start the reaction water is formed as steam which then collapses as it cools. The other gasses present initially were diluted and mostly released before the flame fount was able to maintain temperature and travel inside the tube
GOOD EXAMPLE OF WHAT HHO CAN DO! People thinks it takes a lot of hho to run a vehicle but it doesn't if injected right very little can be used. Here is the kicker who ever figures out this trick will either be famous,dead, or just be energy independent.
@Me102288, Hi Guy, Thanks for the comment , I have been looking in to Implosive / explosive force since 1st commenting, & it seems that when HHo Has less than 5% Oxygen in the given volume, it is implosive, and when it has "more" than 5% Oxygen in the volume mix, Then it becomes explosive, & a German university study group found that with Hydrogen in a combustion engine, the explosive was more beneficial than just using implosive pure hydrogen, interesting stuff. thanks again. Thom In Scotland.
@Vintusful What I like is the hho research. I want to come up with a safe way to inject hho gas into my car and see how good it will do mileage-wise. Without ANY explosions. That's why I appreciate these explosion videos.
Great video. The vacuum that draws the water back into the cell is created by the cooling of the gas in the cell which was heated and greatly expanded in the burning. As the gas cools it shrinks creating a vacuum in the cell
I love this video. It is so old an still no one can explain what really happens. I watched it years ago and it was the reason why I did my own research on implosion. Here are two facts that I saw myself while running my self developped implosion device: an implosion show now flash at all. No flame, no light. Second the sound is very different to an explosion. It is much quieter and more like a "petch" than a "bam" so to speak. An before some people tell me that I dont have a glue of anything, I'm an engineer with more than 20 years of experience in lab applications. So whoever hgfriend is, you were right!
1. Implosion is when vacuum causes chamber to collapse. Light bulbs do this sometimes. 2. Get a bubbler! Less risk of damaging reactor. 3. You can make flash arrestor to prevent flashbacks, put a brass nipple between your torch and bubbler and fill it with bronze wool.
I remember my science teacher doing a demo where he took an empty coffee can, and punctured a small hole on one end and put the lid on it. he then filled it up with natural gas and lit it. There was a steady flame like a candle until it burned all the gas up. Suddenly the can would explode, blowing the lid off and go about 4' in the air. He said that this was caused from the oxygen rushing in when the oxygen inside the can is all used up. He said it was called Internal combustion.
Not an implosion, the gasses left in your hho gen are hot from the burn... as they cool off they contract causing the vacuum. Also the plates are heated from the amps you have running through them. When you heat any open chamber then turn the heat off and cap it, the gasses will shrink as they cool.
@demnlordd666 simply put, what you call an implosion is an attempt of the experiment to come to equilibrium in a fraction of a second. it reduces the pressure a great deal by condensing the exploding HHO to water, boils some of the vessel water, to meet the pressure deficit w/ vapor pressure, spikes, n precipitates the H2O back to water in an instant. all a result of a COMBUSTION cycle. it all happens b/c the rxn chamber vents through a small tube allowing an imbalance in pressure for a sec.
Implosion? To me it look more like the flame creating a backfire in the container. To me, it is more internal explosion and vacuum effect, like when you put a candle inside upside down glass.
So, with the syringe experiment.... If you have a 10 meter long syringe (just think iwth me, and 10cm of HHO gas at 1 bar. Ignite it, and surely the 10cm of HHO will expand, pushing the syringe pistons out. But possibly not all the way, pulling that vacume behind it? Resulted steam cools down, first to a smaller volume than the 10cm HHO, and then to 1/1800th of the 10cm, as liquid water? Please correct me when wrong, I need to understand this to continue. Thanks!
Could you do the explosion part again but with a pressure valve on the other end. I wanna see if a water pressure valve or any other kind can withstand and absorb the pressure.
hot air takes more space then cold one eg. 1 gram of cold air take less space then 1 gram of hot one (try to heat air). it is same gram but volume is not a same. so, you have air who is very hot after explosion and then that same air is colder every second... you know the rest. any way, nice demo (Y)
Why didn't it flash back into the system immediately when you tried to light it. Was it pressure of the gas coming out or something else? Im trying to understand how an hho torch does not flash back due to oxygen and hydrogen running through the same lines.
Jup an implosion would be an reaction where the temperature suddenly drops a whole lot, or the hydrogen/oxygen gas should recombine to water really really fast.. both scenarios are implausible.. On the other hand creating an fire inside an closed container uses up all oxygen and burnable gases, the heat inside will dissipate and this will suck. Much like this video!
explocion good real mente me gustaria saber el prosedimiento exacto que sustancias empleas en el silindro, voltaje, corriente,electrodos o celdas etc.saludos desde mexico city.
To help you out as you obviously dont know what a implosion is. It is the exact opposite of explosion, an explosion is a rapid increase in volume in an extreme manner, a implosion is the reverse of this, not gently sucking water out of a glass im·plode (m-pld) v. im·plod·ed, im·plod·ing, im·plodes v.intr. To collapse inward violently. v.tr. 1. To cause to collapse inward violently.
you turned the generator off, the flame backflowed in the generator... So hot air is less dense, it cools and the pressure decreases. Whats the big deal?
nice experiment, but what you have in the reactor is not an implosion! Why? Because the flame front travels back to your reactor using up the fuel (HHO) and creating heat. As the reactor quickly starts to cool the volume of gases inside drops creating negative pressure.
That, my dear man, is called a flashback.. and the main reason for adding a one-way check valve and bubbler to your Generator system. Its a good thing his plates and water are nasty. It would have been a big mess if he was producing a lot of HHO gas
@Me102288 That is a good point. Deigning your containers to fail predictably and safely is good practice. Yes I would have to agree that it is safer than gasoline, I think everything is safer than gasoline. Hydrogen has a high dispersion rate so in a well vented area the hydrogen will be gone very fast in cases of leaks that do not ignite. One property of hydrogen that can make it unsafe in cases were other fuels are is that it does not have a minimum fuel air ratio to burn.
amazing, why at 5:44, the implosion didnt blow away the bottle as same as the previous explosion? I guess the bottle was so strong, thank for this awesome
Great experiment. I can't understand why people have to write all those negative, know it all comments.I always wondered, but I never got any real answer to how much a hydroxy mix ignited actually expand/contract. Everybody think they know, but they all have different answers... Was the object of Stan Meyers injection of laser light f.ex.an attemt to control this ratio ? Probably. It's one of those things that has been kept out of the regular textbooks (or you have to look hard for it)
Ok for the explosion, but it did not implode ! This is not an implosion : the HHO being burned (it has EXPLODED in the bottle and you can be sure the burned gas has come out the bootle), its pressure inside the bottle has drastically diminished, being lower than the atmospheric pressure...
Yes, I have known about making hydrogen gas like this for a LONG time, however, do this experiment with 60cc of gas or alcohol: the explosion would be enough that you wouldn't want to be that close to it. The energy that was consumed in this experiment would not even propel one cylinder through a complete revolution.
At first when Hydrogen And Oxygen React, Both Of The Gases Will Heat Up Along Side the Air Which Will Make The Gases Expand Before Being Used Up (And Thats What Happened At The Syringe Part) But After This Expansion, The gases Are Consumed Due To the Chemical Reaction Making Water Vapour (Which Is Obviously Less In Volume) Thus Creating A Decreased Pressure And Do Work To Pull The Atmospheric Air Inside The container (You Pulled The Water With That Force)
when the hho explodes it turns back into water. water has a much lower density than the hho. thats why you get the "implosion" the explosion is all about temperature wich decreases the density and therefor increases the pressure. srry for bad english
Of course it can explode, It wouldn't be able to push a cylinder if it didn't. That is the whole reason why it is being used as a fuel now. And since you did these experiments only a few cm away from your hands, we can now see that it is perfectly safe. thank you!
when fire is present it eats oxygen. when the happens there is a pressure difference that occurs due to the change in gas composition. in reality this does create a inward pressure consitered a type of implosion.
That's not an implosion, is simply the flame entering the cell vessel and causing the explosion of the contained Hydrogen gas, and in fact you need to stop electrolysis to lower vessel pressure and let the fire in. In turn the explosion makes most of the gas exit the vessel and that produces a vacuum - as in all explosions. Instead an implosion happens when there is a substantial and fast decrease in volume, but definitely that's not the case.
Is it really an implosion? ... I think you get an explosion inside the reactor. and the it pumps back, cause the air gets hot, and after get cold again and need less place.... Isn't so, that when you get an implosion, the reactor schould be destroyed like some submarines?
That is not a implosion that is merely the act of the hydroxy(hydrogen+oxygen) pushing out the air with the explosion and before the air rushes back in you put the cup under the pipe therefore creating a vacuum in the electrolosis chamber which tries to suck up the water in the space of air.
That's not an implosion. Excerpt from Wikipedia: "Implosion is a process in which objects are destroyed by collapsing (or being squeezed in) on themselves. The opposite of explosion, implosion concentrates matter and energy."
There is no implosion. During the explosion, some of the HHO, if not all, turns back to H2O (a liquid) which takes less space than HHO (a gass), and that creates the vacuum.
Estoy por un buen tiempo observando sobre este proceso de la energia de grandiosos beneficios y este video a mi corto entendimiento es lo mas ilustrativo o formativo que he encontrado. SABER PARA PRE- VER UN ACCIDENTE . MUCHAS GRACIAS hgfrind¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
so one could make a piston engine, in which the intake valve would close before bottom dead center, spark would expand and then contract the piston back down when the exhaust could open maybe it could operate with sleeve valves
So badass , you should make the implosion suck the water back into the tank through a tesla turbine and capture the light energy by solr cells and the het energy by mass hho into a engine and then use the heat exhausts to make steam. It be bad ass project
there is explosion of expanding heated water vapor gas molecules then implosion of h2 + o = water actually both occur at same time cool water vapor takes up less space then h2 and 02 gas...
This is not implosion at the end, but a flashback into the gas producer. That is what you don't want because that is VERY DANGEROUS. The whole thing could explode end you could end up blind caused by pvc shrapnel in your eyes! I hope other viewers are smart enough to never try this,and allways use a flame arrester. Safety first guys!!!
Very nice video and I'm going to link to it, with one caveat. Sorry that I must dis-agree on terminology... Yes a vacuum is formed but NOT because the gas 'imploded'. It's because a gas mixture (hydrogen and oxygen) that takes up 1866 cc (in gaseous form) converts to a liquid (water) that only takes up 1 cc of volume in liquid form. The gas did not implode, it exploded (violent expansion), then (if the 'explosion' was contained... didn't blow the container apart like your syringe experiment) a net vacuum forms because the gases have reformed into molecules that take up much less volume (a vacuum forms). There is ALWAYS an explosion first and THAT is the actual and only 'reaction' thus there is NO implosion. The vacuum forms as a secondary effect of the explosion and is not technically an 'implosion'.
Here is a video that DOES show an implosion... If you separate the ExW portion of the HydrOxy (Brown's Gas) from the hydrogen and oxygen.
th-cam.com/video/-9EmgSowldw/w-d-xo.html
@legogunguy001 - Bingo! You just won a, well, something or other. :-)
The implosion portion of the video is incorrect. The vacuum suction occurs as the exploded gases (including steam) cool and condense.
great music great video well done
great vid and nice piece of music . Thanx
its been done many times in labs around the would. when HHO turns back into water it takes up less space . still is a good vid ,nice to see it done at this level > 5 star stuff
This video reminds me of something I thought about a few years ago. Hydrogen and oxygen take up much more volume than the water they produce which suggests the reaction would create a partial vacuum. Yet the heat produced by the reaction should create an explosion (and it does) and that should create positive pressure. I never investigated the answer but now I'm thinking about it again. It would be useful to know if the piston would get sucked back in if it didn't go flying across the room.
your Explosion used up all the air in the sealed container creating a vacuum not implosion.
oviusly XD but that guy wants just atention XD
Dopy if the mixture is perfectly balanced between H H O then duh its used it up. but its not air because air is on average 70% nitrogen.
incorrect, the only thing in that sealed container was two parts hydrogen to one part oxygen, that means air isn't "used up" because the reaction between hydrogen and oxygen just creates water (and energy) and is not like a regular combustion reaction. So yes you're right it's not an "implosion" it is in fact an explosion, however its the fact that the gasses are creating a liquid and no gas that the explosion creates a slight vacuum not because the air is "used up".
an explosion creates an presure and the heat from the explosion creates presure how can there be vacouum if you trust scool physic books? right! scool books are created to learn us stuff that the big idustries can make money because everybody thinks that tesla is a car and free energy is solar energy !
POOR WORLD
proof:
how long humans know about HHO?
how long humans know about industrieal fuel?
how much engins for industrial fuel are on our stupid planet ? too much
how much engins for HHO are on our stupid planet ? maybe 10 - 20
how much patents for hho inventions on this planet? if there are some they are there becouse the industry want money if they have no more oil
i agree with dennis n steven......the explosion inside the chamber make temporal expansion...then when things begins to cool create a vacuum condition that sucks water.....if u put something in the nozzle during the explosion or implotion as u say.....u will see that something will fly.....
i did the same things like u years ago...but with top lid just snap on type...n when the fire goes into the chamber.... it exlpode...n the top lid fly almost 7 meter up high....so it was an explotion not implode....
Dear Sir,I'm extremely grateful for the experiment uploaded and shown in youtube,titled""HHO Explosion and Implosion"-especially explosion!I would like to help you to prove that after the explosion occurs implosion.For the purpose you have to repeat the eperiment as the body of the syringe should be 5-6 or few times longer,so that after the explosion the piston shouldn't leave the syringe.Once it moves to the left to some point and stops,if vacuum occurs in the syringe,it would start moving backwards. It is extremely curious to what point it would go back in the opposite direction. If you do the experiment the video you can upload in youtube could be titled"HHO Explosion and Implosion-2". Thank you once again,with your experiment I have applied for a patent and I've already had a publication and I would like, if the suggested by myself experiment above occurs a successful one,to establish connection with you! Thank you very much!Regards!
Could it be that what we think we observed is not the whole story? Perhaps with a superior high-speed camera, things may become clearer. I am of the suspension that the water electrolyte mix may be acting as a heat sink. Whereas in the syringe, the hho is a Gass only volume. Hence, as the o2 and hydrogen rebond energy is released this along with the newly formed water. Causing an almost instantaneous steam reaction. However, in the electrolysis chamber, the present fluid absorbs the said energy..... just a theory I'm a mechanic, not a rocket surgeon.
4:40 And the 2009 random object laying around to be set on fire award goes to....
Surrounded by test equipment 3x over in some cases and then use the last of the last minute thoughts of things to burn on camera? LOL LOVE IT!
in both cases there is explosion. in the second case, the water enters through the tube into the reactor because the explosion consumed the entire oxygen
Likewise, the explosion is heated inside of the reactor, and in cooling process the remaining gases are beginning to shrink and created a vacuum.
(google translate)
Exactly when I was going to say
like someone else stated. The explosion first created pressure that was looking to get out. the when the explosion was finished and everything was cooling down there was a vacuum. BUT also we have to consider that HHO molecules might take up more space than H2O water molecules, The HHO is converted to H20 vapor. Does room temp H2O vapor take up less space than room temp HHO? Maybe! We are taking 3 molecules and turning them into 1 molecule with 3 parts. So, I think you might be right.
You are one fucking daring guy on the internet. I learned a lot today. Thank you
No dude. You just instantly burned up all the gas that was in the tank, leaving a vacuum behind. It does look like a good way to create a vacuum quickly, if you can first vent the explosion! Nice work. I'm finally about to install on my vehicle!
Nitrogen was burnt up?
I know what your thinking but the gas does not burn up as such, it simply combines with other gasses to form both gaseous and solid byproducts, take a gas formed by the separation of water through adding a few electrons, in recombination after the initial energy is used to start the reaction water is formed as steam which then collapses as it cools.
The other gasses present initially were diluted and mostly released before the flame fount was able to maintain temperature and travel inside the tube
GOOD EXAMPLE OF WHAT HHO CAN DO! People thinks it takes a lot of hho to run a vehicle but it doesn't if injected right very little can be used. Here is the kicker who ever figures out this trick will either be famous,dead, or just be energy independent.
@Me102288, Hi Guy, Thanks for the comment , I have been looking in to Implosive / explosive force since 1st commenting, & it seems that when HHo Has less than 5% Oxygen in the given volume, it is implosive, and when it has "more" than 5% Oxygen in the volume mix, Then it becomes explosive, & a German university study group found that with Hydrogen in a combustion engine, the explosive was more beneficial than just using implosive pure hydrogen, interesting stuff. thanks again.
Thom In Scotland.
@Vintusful What I like is the hho research. I want to come up with a safe way to inject hho gas into my car and see how good it will do mileage-wise. Without ANY explosions.
That's why I appreciate these explosion videos.
Great video. The vacuum that draws the water back into the cell is created by the cooling of the gas in the cell which was heated and greatly expanded in the burning. As the gas cools it shrinks creating a vacuum in the cell
I love this video. It is so old an still no one can explain what really happens. I watched it years ago and it was the reason why I did my own research on implosion. Here are two facts that I saw myself while running my self developped implosion device: an implosion show now flash at all. No flame, no light. Second the sound is very different to an explosion. It is much quieter and more like a "petch" than a "bam" so to speak. An before some people tell me that I dont have a glue of anything, I'm an engineer with more than 20 years of experience in lab applications. So whoever hgfriend is, you were right!
Why would they care if you have glue or not, heh heh heh.
Is there anyway you could show us some of your implosion devices?
1. Implosion is when vacuum causes chamber to collapse. Light bulbs do this sometimes.
2. Get a bubbler! Less risk of damaging reactor.
3. You can make flash arrestor to prevent flashbacks, put a brass nipple between your torch and bubbler and fill it with bronze wool.
I remember my science teacher doing a demo where he took an empty coffee can, and punctured a small hole on one end and put the lid on it. he then filled it up with natural gas and lit it. There was a steady flame like a candle until it burned all the gas up. Suddenly the can would explode, blowing the lid off and go about 4' in the air. He said that this was caused from the oxygen rushing in when the oxygen inside the can is all used up. He said it was called Internal combustion.
Thats extremely interesting, probably a good demonstration of Backdraft as well
Not an implosion, the gasses left in your hho gen are hot from the burn... as they cool off they contract causing the vacuum. Also the plates are heated from the amps you have running through them. When you heat any open chamber then turn the heat off and cap it, the gasses will shrink as they cool.
I did it with an electronic board, which has an 160hz oscillator and a high voltage coil of the spark distributor of a car.
Greetings, Hans.
I think you should monitor the chamber temp. If the interior residual gas cools, that is a stronger explanation for the water draw.
3:00 I love how the lights flash when he turns it on
@demnlordd666 simply put, what you call an implosion is an attempt of the experiment to come to equilibrium in a fraction of a second. it reduces the pressure a great deal by condensing the exploding HHO to water, boils some of the vessel water, to meet the pressure deficit w/ vapor pressure, spikes, n precipitates the H2O back to water in an instant. all a result of a COMBUSTION cycle. it all happens b/c the rxn chamber vents through a small tube allowing an imbalance in pressure for a sec.
man.the slow motion sound was awesome.
Implosion? To me it look more like the flame creating a backfire in the container. To me, it is more internal explosion and vacuum effect, like when you put a candle inside upside down glass.
Correct! perfectly said
Very much thanks for the nice implosion
Hydrogen is my favorite element.!
M Jay ok.
Good job 👍
Have you experimented with HF separation, it produces a different state of gasses
So, with the syringe experiment....
If you have a 10 meter long syringe (just think iwth me, and 10cm of HHO gas at 1 bar. Ignite it, and surely the 10cm of HHO will expand, pushing the syringe pistons out. But possibly not all the way, pulling that vacume behind it? Resulted steam cools down, first to a smaller volume than the 10cm HHO, and then to 1/1800th of the 10cm, as liquid water? Please correct me when wrong, I need to understand this to continue. Thanks!
Could you do the explosion part again but with a pressure valve on the other end. I wanna see if a water pressure valve or any other kind can withstand and absorb the pressure.
Your neighbors might think that you were shooting a Glock.
hot air takes more space then cold one
eg. 1 gram of cold air take less space then 1 gram of hot one (try to heat air). it is same gram but volume is not a same.
so, you have air who is very hot after explosion and then that same air is colder every second... you know the rest.
any way, nice demo (Y)
Nice work and a good demo. David A. Puchta
Why didn't it flash back into the system immediately when you tried to light it. Was it pressure of the gas coming out or something else? Im trying to understand how an hho torch does not flash back due to oxygen and hydrogen running through the same lines.
i like your vid and the music what is the name of the song?
Does the implosion creates a vacuum or does the vacuum create the implosion?
How far flight the pump?
How much weight the pump?
Input power in kilojoules?
Thank you!
First class video. A wonderfull demo whats going on with Hydrogen burnt in the presence of Oxygen and the side effects it will have in a cylinder.
A1
Unexpectly nice one
Jup an implosion would be an reaction where the temperature suddenly drops a whole lot, or the hydrogen/oxygen gas should recombine to water really really fast.. both scenarios are implausible..
On the other hand creating an fire inside an closed container uses up all oxygen and burnable gases, the heat inside will dissipate and this will suck.
Much like this video!
hi, what is your schematic of that spark?
thanks [ 0:47 ]
It's literally a power supply with two wires.
Oké thanks
THANKS FOR SHOWING WHAT HAPPENS IN THE MOTOR WHEN HHO MEETS A PISTON OHHH AND ONE MORE THING YOU MIGHT WANT TO ADD A FLASH ARRESTER
Cool vid..how many LPM are you producing with your setup?
what do you mean, whats stronger - HHO Explosion or Implosion? very very good video! thanks
Grear Video, TKS for share!!!
Nice background mucis
explocion good real mente me gustaria saber el prosedimiento exacto que sustancias empleas en el silindro, voltaje, corriente,electrodos o celdas etc.saludos desde mexico city.
To help you out as you obviously dont know what a implosion is.
It is the exact opposite of explosion, an explosion is a rapid increase in volume in an extreme manner, a implosion is the reverse of this, not gently sucking water out of a glass
im·plode (m-pld)
v. im·plod·ed, im·plod·ing, im·plodes
v.intr.
To collapse inward violently.
v.tr.
1. To cause to collapse inward violently.
you turned the generator off, the flame backflowed in the generator... So hot air is less dense, it cools and the pressure decreases. Whats the big deal?
nice experiment, but what you have in the reactor is not an implosion! Why? Because the flame front travels back to your reactor using up the fuel (HHO) and creating heat. As the reactor quickly starts to cool the volume of gases inside drops creating negative pressure.
it would have been nice to watch this video without background music
That, my dear man, is called a flashback.. and the main reason for adding a one-way check valve and bubbler to your Generator system. Its a good thing his plates and water are nasty. It would have been a big mess if he was producing a lot of HHO gas
So the impulsion pulse seems stronger and longer than the explosion pulse.
@Me102288 That is a good point. Deigning your containers to fail predictably and safely is good practice. Yes I would have to agree that it is safer than gasoline, I think everything is safer than gasoline. Hydrogen has a high dispersion rate so in a well vented area the hydrogen will be gone very fast in cases of leaks that do not ignite. One property of hydrogen that can make it unsafe in cases were other fuels are is that it does not have a minimum fuel air ratio to burn.
amazing, why at 5:44, the implosion didnt blow away the bottle as same as the previous explosion? I guess the bottle was so strong, thank for this awesome
@hgfrind
Yes, I know. The explosion energy of interest.
Vertically tried already? With heavier weight?
Great experiment. I can't understand why people have to write all those negative, know it all comments.I always wondered, but I never got any real answer to how much a hydroxy mix ignited actually expand/contract. Everybody think they know, but they all have different answers... Was the object of Stan Meyers injection of laser light f.ex.an attemt to control this ratio ? Probably. It's one of those things that has been kept out of the regular textbooks (or you have to look hard for it)
Congratulations. You've just made a "water gun"
Is there any chance you could post or send me the wiring diagram for the ignition.
Ok for the explosion, but it did not implode !
This is not an implosion : the HHO being burned (it has EXPLODED in the bottle and you can be sure the burned gas has come out the bootle), its pressure inside the bottle has drastically diminished, being lower than the atmospheric pressure...
implode, cause 3,6L go to 36L(at 3000C, one explosion) and after to 0 0,018L, one implosion
I believe that when HHO is ignited that steam is produced then the steam condenses forming a vacuum
It isn't a pump, it's a coil to produce high voltage for the spark to explode the HHO.
which mixing ratio x water nitrate, or bicarbonate.?
Yes, I have known about making hydrogen gas like this for a LONG time, however, do this experiment with 60cc of gas or alcohol: the explosion would be enough that you wouldn't want to be that close to it. The energy that was consumed in this experiment would not even propel one cylinder through a complete revolution.
At first when Hydrogen And Oxygen React,
Both Of The Gases Will Heat Up Along Side the Air Which Will Make The Gases Expand Before Being Used Up (And Thats What Happened At The Syringe Part) But After This Expansion,
The gases Are Consumed Due To the Chemical Reaction Making Water Vapour (Which Is Obviously Less In Volume) Thus Creating A Decreased Pressure And Do Work To Pull The Atmospheric Air Inside The container (You Pulled The Water With That Force)
when the hho explodes it turns back into water. water has a much lower density than the hho. thats why you get the "implosion" the explosion is all about temperature wich decreases the density and therefor increases the pressure.
srry for bad english
Where was the Flash durring the explosion part?
name of the kit
homemade?
input volt amps ?
please can u tell me?
Walter Russell said，"An inward explosion is gravitation"
Your absolutely right!
Hot air expands hot air that is cooled down shrinks and thus create a vacuum, as simple as that.
Why do'nt you simulate the Implosion inside the syringe ?
do you think hes on about the music??
Of course it can explode, It wouldn't be able to push a cylinder if it didn't. That is the whole reason why it is being used as a fuel now. And since you did these experiments only a few cm away from your hands, we can now see that it is perfectly safe. thank you!
how many Amp. consume the cell to do that?? . Mix the H and O2 generated could be dangerous or not ?
when fire is present it eats oxygen. when the happens there is a pressure difference that occurs due to the change in gas composition. in reality this does create a inward pressure consitered a type of implosion.
That's not an implosion, is simply the flame entering the cell vessel and causing the explosion of the contained Hydrogen gas, and in fact you need to stop electrolysis to lower vessel pressure and let the fire in. In turn the explosion makes most of the gas exit the vessel and that produces a vacuum - as in all explosions. Instead an implosion happens when there is a substantial and fast decrease in volume, but definitely that's not the case.
When a jar is placed over a lit candle it will produce a vacuum but it is a far cry from an implosion
Negative pressure, but it will form a vacuum
Explain why Stan Meyers used a pressure regulator @ 15 PSI and he he prevented this
Is very dangerous what you just did there , you where very lucky that filter vasel hold the pressure , but anyway ......I like your courage
you called it right .. a pressure not a vacuum :) cause it is not an implosion ! and the vacuum created after is from the air cooling down !
Is it really an implosion? ... I think you get an explosion inside the reactor. and the it pumps back, cause the air gets hot, and after get cold again and need less place.... Isn't so, that when you get an implosion, the reactor schould be destroyed like some submarines?
Wow I needed a video proof of that and no one other would know that if you didn’t post it
That is not a implosion that is merely the act of the hydroxy(hydrogen+oxygen) pushing out the air with the explosion and before the air rushes back in you put the cup under the pipe therefore creating a vacuum in the electrolosis chamber which tries to suck up the water in the space of air.
That's not an implosion.
Excerpt from Wikipedia: "Implosion is a process in which objects are destroyed by collapsing (or being squeezed in) on themselves. The opposite of explosion, implosion concentrates matter and energy."
There is no implosion.
During the explosion, some of the HHO, if not all, turns back to H2O (a liquid) which takes less space than HHO (a gass), and that creates the vacuum.
how did you produce implosions??
awsome man tahts genius we never thought about replacing the cylinders directly whit cells ^^ n1
IS THERE A TWO STAGE ENGINE PRINCIPLE IN THAT?
wat is the HV thet you are yousing as ignition
the oscilator tipe thing
scematic please!!!!!
Estoy por un buen tiempo observando sobre este proceso de la energia de grandiosos beneficios y este video a mi corto entendimiento es lo mas ilustrativo o formativo que he encontrado.
SABER PARA PRE- VER UN ACCIDENTE .
MUCHAS GRACIAS hgfrind¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
so one could make a piston engine, in which the intake valve would close before bottom dead center, spark would expand and then contract the piston back down when the exhaust could open maybe it could operate with sleeve valves
So badass , you should make the implosion suck the water back into the tank through a tesla turbine and capture the light energy by solr cells and the het energy by mass hho into a engine and then use the heat exhausts to make steam. It be bad ass project
there is explosion of expanding heated water vapor gas molecules then implosion of h2 + o = water actually both occur at same time cool water vapor takes up less space then h2 and 02 gas...
This is not implosion at the end, but a flashback into the gas producer. That is what you don't want because that is VERY DANGEROUS. The whole thing could explode end you could end up blind caused by pvc shrapnel in your eyes! I hope other viewers are smart enough to never try this,and allways use a flame arrester.
Safety first guys!!!
Well that's a nice way to refill my HHO generator.
Fusé...🤸♂️🤸♀️🚀🚀🚀