@@youin24yearsI agree,i wish Capcom would remake those two first and only then do 5,since most people don't even know who Albert Wesker is and his purpose in the RESIDENT EVIL universe.I say most people because a vast majoraty of the RESIDENT EVIL fanbase only got introduced to the franchise after playing 4,while there's also something people played a remake of RESIDENT EVIL:CODE VERONICA should come before a remake of RESIDENT EVIL 5 that way they could flesh out Wesker's evil nature as a villain more and show his long time hatred for Chris,in RESIDENT EVIL 5 we saw how much he despised his ex subordinate i mean Capcom gave him a bigger spotlight in the remake of 4 with him playing a bigger role in it and having more conversations/interations with Ada and even assisting her on her quest to retrieve the LAS PLAGAS's samples for him,personally i think that was plain stupid writing/rewriting by Capcom because why would Wesker send one of his secret agents to Spain if he's already there!!? The original RE4 (2005) had a better script in that regard since they only talked through the communication's radio and he wasn't there to oversee her progress on her mission and only gave coordenations to both Krauser and her from his stallite station with that being said it would be plausible that he would require the help of his two agents to get the samples for him , in a remake of RE5 if Capcom keeps the volcano battle they could make Chris mention their last encounter from in CV in which he could say a bad@ss one liner after blowing him up like ''Now you have payed for what you did to ALPHA team and Claire my sister''
What I was hoping for was a more fleshed out Racoon city. As it's one of the last times you get to experience that setting. Not completely open world, but the map should've been larger, or more locations. Like how Silent Hill 2 was set up. They could've even added more side quest, like helping scattered civilians and coming across new weapons through exploration. Plus, it would make running from Nemesis feel less scripted. Also, Nemesis himself seemed more like Mr X. I swear in the original he was much faster. Or maybe that's because of the tank controls. 😅
Couldn’t agree more. RE3 Nemesis is one of the best games of the franchise and the remake we got was so far from what it should have been. I wouldn’t mind a Directors Cut and them getting rid of the scripted events and fixing Nemesis AI and patterns. The OG Nemesis was able to adapt to the players play style and anticipate what you would do from your positioning, what weapons you were using and the use of environmental hazards. It was way better than what we got and new comers have no idea what kind of threat Nemeses once was. Not to mention it took way more than one measly grenade to put him down.
A leaker has stated that they wouldn't revisit RE3, as it made enough money for Capcom. But they also said that upcoming remakes would be higher budget and won't cut content unlike RE3R and RE4R
@@Ignisan_66 "At this rate" is why it's of note. Mainline FF games have almost stopped. 7 years between FF15 and 16. RE 6 and 7 were 5 years apart and that was unusually long. RE 7 and 8 were 4 years apart. RE9 looks like it could be 4 years after 8 too. That's with the 2-3-4 remakes in between too. RE games are being released at almost twice the rate and on top of that they are generally being recieved better by their franchise fans which motivates the devs / publishers more.
RE 0 yes but not RE 1. Leave that game alone for godsake. Any Remake of RE1 Remake will be 100% inferior and ruin the whole Resident Evil 1 experience. That fixed camera, artstyle, graphics, gameplay, atmosphere, sound effects, soundtrack hell even that dialogue and voice acting are what define Resident Evil 1. You need to experience all that if you wanna say that you've played Resident Evil 1. If the new Remake would be over-the-shoulder 3rd person generic modern RE game it would lose everything that made the game so amazing and unique.
@ I've actually played the RE 1 Remake & yea it's a classic but a remake is needed like how RE 4 had its remake, RE 1 is slow & its not 2002 especially with technological advances in gaming it's very necessary but the RE 1 that is available now will always be for people like minded on your stance but for those who enjoy remakes will be worth every min playing that new remake.
@@cotton9087 no it wasn't, it's a pretty solid game it just lacked the atmosphere the previous RESIDENT EVIL titles give off since most of the game is set during the day with some small segments happening in the night and having a partner guarding your back all the away to the end kinda takes away the horror but as an action game it's pretty good
@@cotton9087 5 was unnecessary because 4 should have been a one off. The same way 7 should have been a one off. Wtf even is this series anymore. what's next? Zombie clowns in a circus? I was kidding Capcom.
@@TokuAndAnimationNewsNetworkI have a feeling that's the reason why it's taking so long for us to get.This is because a Monster Hunter.I may think about it for the last 2 years.They've been talking about nothing but monster hunter
What I feel like some people don’t realize is that even if they remake RE1, the old one doesn’t stop existing. And it’s their company and their games, they can do as they please
Capcom is known to be unfaithful by unjustifiably cutting content including features, modes, locations, bosses, monsters, etc. Resident Evil 2 (2019) isn’t Remake for cutting 40% of Original Content. Resident Evil 3 (2020) isn’t Remake for cutting 80% of Original Content. Resident Evil 4 (2023) isn’t Remake for cutting 40% of Original Content.
@@nintendogamingchannel1007 I am curious what cut content from RE4 is cut? While some of the content came out later in the DLC most of the items are still there. As an example while Leon doesnt do the Laser field like in the original Ada does in the DLC so while different its there/ Same goes for most things I can think of they are there but different such as Luis instead of dying to Saddler instead dies to Krauser. So I am curious as someone who has played both games what was cut.
I certainly want a RE1 remake in line with the new engine and modern character models. Im so tried of fake elitists malding over it like it somehow will devalue the original remake. Its embarassing.
I feel that Capcom (considering fans old and new) should structure their next few remakes like a Chris vs Wesker trilogy. Many new fans don’t know a lot about Wesker or Chris or other things like that. In my personal opinion, they should release the remakes like this: RE1 remake (with 0 as DLC), RE CV remake, RE5 remake. Resident Evil 1 remake is an incredible game, but should get an RE Engine remake as the Spencer Mansion would look stunning (plus it would make a more cohesive story). Then it would be Code Veronica, continuing the story and finally restoring this classic. Then capping it off with Resident Evil 5, which would need a remake by the time it comes out (RE1 hypothetically would come out on 30th anniversary in 2026, with CV coming out 2028, and RE5 would be 19 years old by 2028).
If you want to understand Wesker they need to do RE1, Code Veronica, then RE5. It’s been a long time since I played Zero. But if he’s connected, they should do RE5 later. I would push for RE1 in 2025 alongside a proper RE3 Reprint. Just patch the story to add the clock tower and you instantly gain back to the loyalty of the Vets of the Series. 2026 drop Code Veronica so it has enough time to stew and be proper. Then drop RE9 in 2027. That way the old school fans have something new to chew on. RE5 should drop in 2028 due to there being more than enough time for it to make sense. The finale with RE5 would allow a meaningful send off because I’m sure by then, Capcom will have new ips. Old and new fans will truly appreciate the series being done as dreamed of back in 1998.
Capcom did a survey a few months back about what remake we wanted and code Veronica got the most votes. And rumours say that code Veronica might be in development.
Honestly I love code Veronica I spent hours playing is on the ps2 as a kid, alexia was always sinister to me she had such a every vibe about her but just like a lot of resident evil fans, I’d love outbreak to be remade next
I dont want RE5 or RE6 remade. If they do i want RE5 totally reimagined without the coop aspect. Another is i hope capcom either makes a RE9 like the original 3 RE games, no more RE7 style, imo my favorite formula is the RE2 remake.
I think resident evil outbreak remake could be a masterpiece if it is remade correctly even though the original on PS2 is far from perfect. Events are happening simultaneously with RE2 and RE3 in Raccoon city witch is the best period of events in the RE serie IMO. You can even hear a survivor in a squad car radio near the police station in RE3 remake (take it as a teaser or not). Capcom could also take note from left 4 dead and Back 4 blood to make it the best multiplayer zombie experience.
Capcom should remake Resident Evil 1 and include Resident Evil 0 as DLC. This approach would create a more cohesive experience, unlike the missed opportunity with Resident Evil 3 Remake, which felt like it should have been DLC for Resident Evil 2 Remake. I know Resident Evil 1 has already been remade once, but if it doesn’t get remade with newer, more polished graphics for today’s audience, this gem of a game might risk being forgotten in the history of the survival horror genre. Resident Evil 4, which originally came out in 2005, got an HD edition in 2014, and even then, it received a full-fledged remake in 2023. So why not Resident Evil 1? It’s a timeless classic that deserves the same level of love and modernization to introduce it to a new generation of gamers.
Glad the re7 director is returning....when the re8 director said "we cut back the scariness because people were to afraid to continue previous games" thats when i realized why re8 was only worth one play through. Because they made a game without any fear which means no real horror. Dont go in the pool if you dont like water. And dont dry the pool for those who like to swim. Re is best when its scary that's why re2remake sold like hot cakes. Scare us to death capcom! Bring that anxiety and tension that made you famous for this franchise.
Ehh. That just your bog standard corporate nonsense. RE8 is the way it is because it was designed from the ground up to be an asset farm for the remake of 4.
@@ChazUBCS 8 was designed from the ground up to allow Capcom to reuse it's assets in 4. If you think that them making a big artistic departure from 7 and that artistic leap just *happening* to involve 8 taking place in the exact same locales as 4 (Rustic Euro Village, Castle, Industrial Area) is a coincidence then you are incredibly naive.
I'm hoping we get Code Veronica next as a remake, as it's one of the craziest RE games, and has a lot of fun character development with Claire, Chris, and Wesker. I'm 42, and have been playing since the first games on PS1. I loved what they have done with the remakes, especially RE2. Though I'm not a fan of Leon and Claire constantly F-bombing while shooting zombies, lol. Their characters just don't strike me as talking like sailors, zombie outbreak or not. It took me out of the immersion because it was so frequent. I never hear anyone else complaining about it either, which I find odd. I mean, now and then sure, but it's like every monster you encounter. Other than that, I feel that remake is perfection. As for the fixed camera angles and tank controls, I think those factors served the older games better than say, the RE1 remake. Those elements were used to increase the suspense, and immersion, and to also fudge some things due to the graphical limitations. While I love RE1 remake, those two factors just didn't work for me the same way they did for the original PS1 games, I would be happy if they remade the 1st game again. My interest in Resident Evil 9 is very minimal, because I just could not get into RE7 at all (I tried, it did not feel like an RE game to me!), and I haven't even bothered with RE Village. I don't like the first person perspective at all for this series!
Code Veronica was awful and watered down a lot from its original scenario. We sure don't need that Di Caprio charactere and his twin uzis, or these stupid jiraya like half tyrants to be back...
@@hurricane7727No Resident Evil 4 beats Code Veronica being doesn't have a confusing paths and puzzles that have no clue to go. As least Resident Evil 4 got a fair path with puzzles that simple and fun without confusing path like Code Veronica original or X version.
@hurricane7727 What graphics it's to dark, but Resident Evil 4 got graphics that can be light and later dark. You don't need Code Veronica, a graphics that too dark to see made no sense at all.
@Twilight17Petkoton I have played both and Code Veronica X has Better graphics and Feels like Resident Evil 1 Gameplay and Feel( Re1 was my first Re game).
Code Veronica was the true Resident Evil 4 as it completes the story of Claire finding her brother. And it even acknowledges Leon in the game before his encounter in RE4. And, RE5 is not the next chronological game. Revelations 1 happens before RE5. Don't forget that the 4 CGI movies are part of canon (Degeneration, etc). So, the next remakes should be the following in order to clean up the story: 1. RE 0 2. RE 1 3. Outbreak 4. Code Veronica 5. Revelations 1 6. RE 5 7. Revelations 2 8. RE 6 needs to be retconned.
Your post is solid regarding Resident Evil 4's awkward placement in the original Resident Evil series timeline. With only a brief mention of Chris comparing the Majini's behavior to the Ganados from the Kennedy report and the appearance of the Las Plagas parasite, Resident Evil 4 could have easily been handwaved because that game's story had ZERO effects in the original Resident Evil timeline. Heck, had Resident Evil 4 just been Code Veronica, the Resident Evil 5 writers could just brushed off the Las Plagas parasite as something Wesker discovered in Spain and wouldn't have the effect story of Resident Evil 5. If players were interested, Capcom could have just put the whole discovery of it as a DLC episode. I think the writer's decision to make the game a soft reboot for the franchise was, looking back, a very poor decision, and I'm glad the writers took the half-ass story (as admitted by RE4's original director) RE4 had and rewrote it from the ground up to make it actually fit in the Resident Evil timeline.
They really should do a new Resident Evil 1 Re-Remake especially with rumours of RE5 Remake but also because its rumoured that Jill will be in RE9 with Leon.
RE1 REREMake seems to be the best bet. They wouldn’t have to change the story. Just update graphics, get rid of fixed camera, and perhaps make the dialogue better
I started with Resident Evil 4 Classic, played all the newer titles, and recently, for the first time, played and beat a "traditional" Resident Evil game-RE1 Remake. What I don’t get is that whenever I hear about how beloved the older “fixed-camera, tank-control” games are, fans often mention elements that aren’t really present in modern RE games. It feels strange that traditional fans seem to wish for a game that might not fully capture what made the originals so special. For example, inventory management would likely be different with the inclusion of inventory pouches, and key items like the lighter might not even take up inventory space. You might not even need the lighter at all if you can dismember bodies with a knife. I haven’t played other classic titles besides RE1 Remake, so I could be wrong, but based on my experience, RE1 Remake felt more like a puzzle game with a horror theme than a horror game with puzzles in it. There’s also a chance that puzzles might be simplified to make them easier to solve in a modern version. From what I remember, my biggest challenge wasn’t dealing with zombies-it was figuring out where to go, especially since the fixed camera angles sometimes obscured pathways. That said, I’ve been a fan of all the remakes and modern games, so whatever they give us-whether it’s Code Veronica, RE1, or RE0-I’ll look forward to it. Even though RE5 is one of my favorites because of the co-op, it’s amazing how many games struggle to get co-op right. Despite being an older game, RE5 still has fantastic co-op mechanics.
Crimson Heads would be unneccessary in a new remake of RE1. They don't make sense and weren't featured in any other game. I have loved the RE games since 1998 when I first played RE2, but I welcome changes with the remakes. If I wanted the same experience as the original games, I would just go and replay the original games. I play the remakes for the same story, but updated to match modern standards. Plus, as a grown adult I no longer have the patience for the old save system because I don't have as much time to game these days as I used to. Back then, I was fully able to replay RE2 58 times over. Now, I'm lucky if I get 2-3 replays in. Had it not been for Covid, I would have played RE3 a lot less than I did.
@@bepohal I'm sorry, was I talking to you? No, I actually wasn't. However, obviously I'm going to speak for myself. Why would I speak for everyone else? You sound like one of those insecure snowflakes who has lived their entire life on a cellphone and has no social awareness to interact with people as you think every differing opinion is a personal attack on you,
@ get outside and touch grass since you have a skill issue and „no time“ (which we both know is a code for „i‘m playing on assisted“). embarrassing kid
I’m pretty sure I’m in the minority here (no pun intended lol)….but I honestly would LOVE an RE6 remake BUT DEFINITELY with ALOT of changes. Kind of a way to redeem itself: 1. Make it actually Scary lol. I think most will agree that Leon/Helena’s campaign was the closest to survival-horror out of the bunch but even that’s pushing it lol…even Ada’s can potentially be scarier. You can definitely make Jake/Sherry’s campaign a bit more horrifying especially with the Ustanak chasing you. Now Chris/Piers campaign might be a bit tricky given it’s damn near pure action with little to no horror but the developers can find a way to make it work. 2. Cut out the repetitiveness. Having to play some of the same missions over again just with a different team was annoying AF and kind of pointless. Just make them part of a certain teams campaign then have cut scenes to bridge the gap with the others🤷🏾♂️. 3. I know these are video games but let’s try to keep it maybe somewhat grounded in reality lol. I mean come on….the Jake/Sherry motorcycle chase, Leon hesitant to shoot the President after he’s clearly a zombie, fighting the giants but you have to jump onto them to pull out their vulnerable parts etc. 😂 So overall Those are pretty much the only real issues I had with the game but I’d love to hear what you all would suggest they change IF they were to remake RE6 😊
I don't so much care about which ones get remade next, but as far as quality of remakes goes I have the highest hopes for *Code Veronica and RE6. The writing* of the remakes has so far always improved alot over the originals and i thing CV and RE6 have the *most unrealized potential in the story department.* RE0 could be interesting aswell and aside from that I think something like a completely new RE Bravo team, that focusses on all the dying members of the RE1 crew could be interesting. I think there's also room for *classic RE1 style remakes of the old games that already have new style remakes* and a new style remake for RE1. The genre of these games is completely different now, meaning they should also cover different markets.
I hate this Fake Remakes, I preferred Remaster of Umbrella’s Era (Resident Evil 1 Original, Resident Evil 2, Resident Evil 3 Original, Resident Evil: Code Veronica, Resident Evil: Outbreak 1, Resident Evil: Outbreak File 2 as Collector Edition for 120.00 USD while sold separately for 20.00 each.
Capcom should make 9 about the takedown of Umbrella. Having it happen off screen is criminal. The popularity of the remakes shows people want those original characters back.
What Capcom really needs to do is this in this order; Resident Evil 0 (REmake) Resident Evil (REmake) Resident Evil 3 (REmake Director’s Cut) Resident Evil: Outbreak File 1 & 2 (REmake) Resident Evil: Code Veronica (REmake) Resident Evil: Revelations (REmake) Resident Evil: Revelations 2 (REmake) Then 5, & 6. Then Operation Raccoon City (REmastered or REmake / Optional) [I just miss playing it w/ Friends.]
Maybe they could do the Resident Evil 5 Remake and Code Veronica Remake like Remedy plans on doing Max Payne Remake and Max Payne 2 Remake, two games into one.
It makes sense to do RE CV before RE5 because people who have only played the Remakes aren’t even gonna now who Chris Redfield is. Either way which ever Remake they do Chris will be in it so all I gotta say is Please bring back Roger Craig Smith to voice Chris especially for RE5
That means they aren't Fans then prior to the Remakes. I have played Re1, Re 5 and Revelations including Marvel vs Capcom 3 games and know who Chris is.
RE1 with a first person/open world perspective would be really awesome! Sort of like RE7 but make it RE1 and do it even better than RE7. Wow, that would be killer!
Even though its already been remade, RE1 modern day would be nice. If that were to happen, I would want to see a canonical ending with Chris, Jill, Barry, and Rebecca
I think Capcom remaking RESIDENT EVIL -CODE VERONICA before remaking 5 would make a lot more sense since it would not only bring back Claire to the mainspotlight again but also help flesh out Wesker's character and personality and also his long time hatred for Chris i mean after his small participation in RE4R it wouldn't make sense to having in a game where out of nowhere he's the main villain and killed off ,CVR would give us a good introduction of him and also reasons to hate his guts,i also hope Capcom doesn't cut content from the original like they did to the P.R.L. 412 in RE4R,THE MERCENARIES mode from og RESIDENT EVIL 3 (1999) and also EXTREME BATTLE mode which was replaced by the GHOST SURVIVORS mode this change i didn't mind since it was neat mode to play but still...it would be nice if they had remaked that game as well! With a remake of CV I hope Capcom keeps the EXTREME BATTLE mode this time around they could keep Chris's facial model from RESIDENT EVIL 1 remake/rebirth the same they used in both RESIDENT EVIL-UMBRELLA CHRONICLES and RESIDENT EVIL-THE DARKSIDE CHRONICLES since he's younger in CODE VERONICA although it's very unlikely they would do that since Capcom keeps changing each RESIDENT EVIL protagonist's look every game
I still think the best order for future remakes is RE 1, Code Veronica and then 5. I say that because as good as RE1 remake is, its not in over the shoulder style with the RE engine and most new players won't get the experience they want. Also doing it in that order gives best Wesker introduction.
I'm so over the first person games, I really hope they don't make RE9 first person again. I didn't like the idea the first time, RE8 didn't make me like it, and RE9 won't either. Please Capcom, stick to 3rd person games for this series, or make spinoffs in first person.
i reckon if its a new protagonist; they may do first person again which I hope they don't also - it is the RE7 director working on the game after all. But capcom must be thinking about the huge success of RE2remake, a 3rd person game that is 2yrs younger has already overtaken RE7's sale figures. Hopefully RE9 will be based on RE2's success. If the protagonist is an original main character; they'll likely have it in 3rd person.. because a lot of people will be annoyed they don't get to see their favourite character.. but who knows what they'll do..
It would be really cool if they did a RE mercenaries free to play game and they have 5 maps from different RE games and 7 characters and it was multiplayer that would be epic and when a new season comes they add 2 new characters and costumes and maps
To build their new Albert Wesker, Capcom need to remake RE0 (especially if they consider Survivor "non canon") and Resident Evil 1. But what I would love to see is a Outbreak remake, Capcom couldn't give us the "definitive Outbreak experience" due to techs limitations of the PS2 and DVDs. Edit: I'm mostly interested by the single player mode of Outbreak.
Their profit-driven side will say 'remake the best games for $$$'. But the side that does it for the love of game will say 'remake the worst games to fix what went wrong'. Code Veronica, as a horrific piece of trash definitely needs the remake then, as there's the inkling of a good game in there dying to be released. It has potential.
You would think that if they are giving this much detail for leaks of RE9... they would have mentioned if it was first or third person. I would think its quite important info.
I definitely want a RE5 remakes ( my favorite entry), I think understand the importance of CV, 0, & 1. Maybe after that we could see a DLC of outbreak, I always wanted to get into those two games
Just my opinion I really don't want Capcom to Remake Resident Evil again, the Game is amazing and doesn't need to be done again, I felt the same way with RE4 as well, and personally I don't like the new Resident Evil Remakes, not because of graphics they look gorgeous, not because of the horror being more scary I love horror, it's the F bombs I hate the F word believe me if you were me you would understand.
No, remakes is better than originals especially the flow of the stories. Capcom remaked RE for all new fans and players who didn't know their old games
I notice that doing CV, then RE5, and then RE9 simultaneously alongside, keeps all the series "mains" in gamers' recent memory, and allows the hype from the remakes and the mainline games to feed each other. That magical "synergy" in my opinion. The only challenge would be Capcom having the resources to staff three AAA efforts closely overlapping each other for a single franchise, and pulling them all off without major development snags screwing up the schedule.
I’m looking forward to being able to the prospect of playing remakes of RE1, RE0 and Code Veronica, I think they’ll be the next ones remade in that order.
I would hope they make 0, 1 or Code Veronica, though I wouldn't mind if they if they gained more experience unlocking graphics on PS5, practicing with RE 5 & 6 remakes.
I honestly don’t think RE5 needs a remake at all . Compared to code Veronica , Zero and possibly RE1 again - RE5 is already done and it’s a lot more modern then those old school classics. We don’t need a RE5 remake
As someone who was introduced to RE through the original 1996 title and someone who has played through the remake as well. Also good to point out I love the re engine remakes , I totally believe in a re remake of part 1 coming out! I'd even like another remake of all these once the technology is even better than it is now these games are just too good and serve greatly to be upgraded when the time permits to be so. 1 to me is just such a damn good game that it just makes sense. With that said I look forward to everything being remade and of course the new entrys into the series.
If they do a code Veronica remake, they should add a dlc bout the telling of Leon n krauser, it happened with the Wii/ps3 chronicals games n should fit nicely too
Its official i have clairvoyant definitely . Right 5 second before scrolling down to see this i was actually deeply thinking of recvx remake its coming confirmed
Resident evil outbreak is what im hoping for the most, but im so happy they finally rebooted. Onimusha absolutely love that franchise just as much as resident evil.
I don't get this idea that fixed camera angles are "outdated". They are not, its an artistic choice that perfectly fits the first RE game. Not every RE game should have that generic boring 3rd person over the shoulder camera. The "modern audience" should stop being so lazy, and scared of different gameplay styles. I was once a hater of that fixed camera but when I actually played RE Remake, I quickly fell in love with the fixed camera, the artstyle, graphics, atmosphere, soundtrack, the whole game. To all who haven't played it yet: That game is on PS4, PS5, Xboxes, Steam, give it a try. I hope Capcom will not remake RE 1 again. It doesn't need a generic 3rd person over-the-shoulder remake. Any modern remake of that game would just be inferior to the 2002 game.
We need a Code Veronica Remake before RE9.
No we don’t :D 1 and 5 would be better remakes than CV anyways.
@@jessejive1174CV is more scarier than 5 lol stop. 1 and CV first then 5.
@@jessejive1174 No way.
@@youin24yearsI agree,i wish Capcom would remake those two first and only then do 5,since most people don't even know who Albert Wesker is and his purpose in the RESIDENT EVIL universe.I say most people because a vast majoraty of the RESIDENT EVIL fanbase only got introduced to the franchise after playing 4,while there's also something people played a remake of RESIDENT EVIL:CODE VERONICA should come before a remake of RESIDENT EVIL 5 that way they could flesh out Wesker's evil nature as a villain more and show his long time hatred for Chris,in RESIDENT EVIL 5 we saw how much he despised his ex subordinate i mean Capcom gave him a bigger spotlight in the remake of 4 with him playing a bigger role in it and having more conversations/interations with Ada and even assisting her on her quest to retrieve the LAS PLAGAS's samples for him,personally i think that was plain stupid writing/rewriting by Capcom because why would Wesker send one of his secret agents to Spain if he's already there!!? The original RE4 (2005) had a better script in that regard since they only talked through the communication's radio and he wasn't there to oversee her progress on her mission and only gave coordenations to both Krauser and her from his stallite station with that being said it would be plausible that he would require the help of his two agents to get the samples for him , in a remake of RE5 if Capcom keeps the volcano battle they could make Chris mention their last encounter from in CV in which he could say a bad@ss one liner after blowing him up like ''Now you have payed for what you did to ALPHA team and Claire my sister''
@@youin24years Fear is subjective. And 5 is a better game.
RE Zero, RE 1 and RE Code Veronica Remakes ASAP......🧟
Re3 needs a real remake
What I was hoping for was a more fleshed out Racoon city. As it's one of the last times you get to experience that setting. Not completely open world, but the map should've been larger, or more locations. Like how Silent Hill 2 was set up. They could've even added more side quest, like helping scattered civilians and coming across new weapons through exploration. Plus, it would make running from Nemesis feel less scripted. Also, Nemesis himself seemed more like Mr X. I swear in the original he was much faster. Or maybe that's because of the tank controls. 😅
Couldn’t agree more. RE3 Nemesis is one of the best games of the franchise and the remake we got was so far from what it should have been. I wouldn’t mind a Directors Cut and them getting rid of the scripted events and fixing Nemesis AI and patterns. The OG Nemesis was able to adapt to the players play style and anticipate what you would do from your positioning, what weapons you were using and the use of environmental hazards. It was way better than what we got and new comers have no idea what kind of threat Nemeses once was. Not to mention it took way more than one measly grenade to put him down.
@@SchizmKingsilent hill 2 remake es una basura 🤮
@@ThomasPayne22it was a good game but not top 5 tbh
A leaker has stated that they wouldn't revisit RE3, as it made enough money for Capcom. But they also said that upcoming remakes would be higher budget and won't cut content unlike RE3R and RE4R
At this rate it won't be long until Resident Evil has more mainline games than Final Fantasy.
Huh? FF has 16 mainline games, RE will have 9. Not even close.
@@Ignisan_66 "At this rate" is why it's of note.
Mainline FF games have almost stopped.
7 years between FF15 and 16.
RE 6 and 7 were 5 years apart and that was unusually long.
RE 7 and 8 were 4 years apart.
RE9 looks like it could be 4 years after 8 too.
That's with the 2-3-4 remakes in between too.
RE games are being released at almost twice the rate and on top of that they are generally being recieved better by their franchise fans which motivates the devs / publishers more.
0 & 1 needs a Remake.
@@MostGemini in vr as well
@ oh yeah for vr players, forgot about that😅
RE 0 yes but not RE 1. Leave that game alone for godsake. Any Remake of RE1 Remake will be 100% inferior and ruin the whole Resident Evil 1 experience. That fixed camera, artstyle, graphics, gameplay, atmosphere, sound effects, soundtrack hell even that dialogue and voice acting are what define Resident Evil 1. You need to experience all that if you wanna say that you've played Resident Evil 1. If the new Remake would be over-the-shoulder 3rd person generic modern RE game it would lose everything that made the game so amazing and unique.
@ I've actually played the RE 1 Remake & yea it's a classic but a remake is needed like how RE 4 had its remake, RE 1 is slow & its not 2002 especially with technological advances in gaming it's very necessary but the RE 1 that is available now will always be for people like minded on your stance but for those who enjoy remakes will be worth every min playing that new remake.
If RE5 is getting a remake it should be very different from the original switching from action to horror!
5 was awful lol
@@cotton9087 It was pretty good, a 7,5/10 imo.
@@cotton9087 no it wasn't, it's a pretty solid game it just lacked the atmosphere the previous RESIDENT EVIL titles give off since most of the game is set during the day with some small segments happening in the night and having a partner guarding your back all the away to the end kinda takes away the horror but as an action game it's pretty good
That garbage game cannot be saved
@@cotton9087 5 was unnecessary because 4 should have been a one off. The same way 7 should have been a one off. Wtf even is this series anymore. what's next? Zombie clowns in a circus? I was kidding Capcom.
Where is DINO CRISIS REMAKE
denied
Capcom said there is no need because Monster Hunter exists.
And right out to that , can we get a devil may cry Remake
@@TokuAndAnimationNewsNetworkI have a feeling that's the reason why it's taking so long for us to get.This is because a Monster Hunter.I may think about it for the last 2 years.They've been talking about nothing but monster hunter
Definitely a great thing after the RE REMAKES are washed.
What I feel like some people don’t realize is that even if they remake RE1, the old one doesn’t stop existing. And it’s their company and their games, they can do as they please
They will have white label remasters & remakes for all of them by 2030, not sure why ppl are upset. Don't like it don't buy it
yep
Capcom is known to be unfaithful by unjustifiably cutting content including features, modes, locations, bosses, monsters, etc.
Resident Evil 2 (2019) isn’t Remake for cutting 40% of Original Content.
Resident Evil 3 (2020) isn’t Remake for cutting 80% of Original Content.
Resident Evil 4 (2023) isn’t Remake for cutting 40% of Original Content.
@@nintendogamingchannel1007 your numbers are completely off, lol. stop the self embarrassing
@@nintendogamingchannel1007 I am curious what cut content from RE4 is cut? While some of the content came out later in the DLC most of the items are still there. As an example while Leon doesnt do the Laser field like in the original Ada does in the DLC so while different its there/ Same goes for most things I can think of they are there but different such as Luis instead of dying to Saddler instead dies to Krauser.
So I am curious as someone who has played both games what was cut.
I certainly want a RE1 remake in line with the new engine and modern character models. Im so tried of fake elitists malding over it like it somehow will devalue the original remake. Its embarassing.
i agree i only
played it on ps1 when i was very young i would like to enjoy it like i have the recent remakes now that im older
Honestly I would love a RE5 remake. The game will need to be re-imagined in many ways but it could be just as epic as the RE4 remake.
what if they remade RE5 but included a DLC title Code: Veronica that told the Code: Veronica story.
@@GarrettTruesdale If they remade RE5 then DLC options would most likely be updated versions of Lost in Nightmares & Desperate Escape
@@GarrettTruesdalehorrible take
Yeah would they make it a split screen experience tho cuz thats what make the re5 goated
@@luck1057 lol, RE5 isn’t goated 😂
I feel that Capcom (considering fans old and new) should structure their next few remakes like a Chris vs Wesker trilogy. Many new fans don’t know a lot about Wesker or Chris or other things like that. In my personal opinion, they should release the remakes like this: RE1 remake (with 0 as DLC), RE CV remake, RE5 remake. Resident Evil 1 remake is an incredible game, but should get an RE Engine remake as the Spencer Mansion would look stunning (plus it would make a more cohesive story). Then it would be Code Veronica, continuing the story and finally restoring this classic. Then capping it off with Resident Evil 5, which would need a remake by the time it comes out (RE1 hypothetically would come out on 30th anniversary in 2026, with CV coming out 2028, and RE5 would be 19 years old by 2028).
Absolutely agree
👍👍👍
RE0 should always be a standalone game. and from a business POV it‘ll be anyways
Code veronica isnt a main game tho
@@biggamer3062 Yes it is Original meant to Be Resident Evil 3 but since Sony had Contract demand 3th Mainline.
You learned facts first.
Code Veronica needs to be before RE5 because Wesker
Everything is getting remade, pretty stoked for Veronica, Zero and RE reremake
If you want to understand Wesker they need to do RE1, Code Veronica, then RE5. It’s been a long time since I played Zero. But if he’s connected, they should do RE5 later. I would push for RE1 in 2025 alongside a proper RE3 Reprint. Just patch the story to add the clock tower and you instantly gain back to the loyalty of the Vets of the Series. 2026 drop Code Veronica so it has enough time to stew and be proper. Then drop RE9 in 2027. That way the old school fans have something new to chew on. RE5 should drop in 2028 due to there being more than enough time for it to make sense. The finale with RE5 would allow a meaningful send off because I’m sure by then, Capcom will have new ips. Old and new fans will truly appreciate the series being done as dreamed of back in 1998.
Capcom did a survey a few months back about what remake we wanted and code Veronica got the most votes. And rumours say that code Veronica might be in development.
Honestly I love code Veronica I spent hours playing is on the ps2 as a kid, alexia was always sinister to me she had such a every vibe about her but just like a lot of resident evil fans, I’d love outbreak to be remade next
I dont want RE5 or RE6 remade. If they do i want RE5 totally reimagined without the coop aspect. Another is i hope capcom either makes a RE9 like the original 3 RE games, no more RE7 style, imo my favorite formula is the RE2 remake.
They should remake Resident Evil 0 and 1 at the same time that will be pretty dope Resident Evil beginning
won‘t happen
@@bepohal Do you work for Capcom?
@@Visigothicwarrior it’s a simple business decision because it’s easy money. economics 101. basic af
Honestly some of the lesser known games should get remakes. Like outbreak and dead aim to fit the timeline.
Should be definitely Code Veronica
I think resident evil outbreak remake could be a masterpiece if it is remade correctly even though the original on PS2 is far from perfect. Events are happening simultaneously with RE2 and RE3 in Raccoon city witch is the best period of events in the RE serie IMO. You can even hear a survivor in a squad car radio near the police station in RE3 remake (take it as a teaser or not). Capcom could also take note from left 4 dead and Back 4 blood to make it the best multiplayer zombie experience.
They can remake zero and RE1 at the same time since they share some environments
won‘t happen
@bepohal probably not but we'll see I'm looking forward to playing whatever they do next
@@justingayman1704share environments? Umm no they don’t
I’m happy that they’re finally doing Onimusha along the way with all these RE games
Capcom should remake Resident Evil 1 and include Resident Evil 0 as DLC. This approach would create a more cohesive experience, unlike the missed opportunity with Resident Evil 3 Remake, which felt like it should have been DLC for Resident Evil 2 Remake.
I know Resident Evil 1 has already been remade once, but if it doesn’t get remade with newer, more polished graphics for today’s audience, this gem of a game might risk being forgotten in the history of the survival horror genre. Resident Evil 4, which originally came out in 2005, got an HD edition in 2014, and even then, it received a full-fledged remake in 2023. So why not Resident Evil 1? It’s a timeless classic that deserves the same level of love and modernization to introduce it to a new generation of gamers.
right and after tht code veronica needs a remake
Part 1 has already been remade
@@ang9303 we are talking about it being remade again and make like re 2 and 3 and 4 remakes
We at least have HD remasters of Resi 1 and Resi 0. They're actually awesome.
@@ang9303 That remake is from 2002. That's like saying Super Mario Bros already got remade for the SNES or Dr. Slump already got remade in 1997.
Glad the re7 director is returning....when the re8 director said "we cut back the scariness because people were to afraid to continue previous games" thats when i realized why re8 was only worth one play through. Because they made a game without any fear which means no real horror. Dont go in the pool if you dont like water. And dont dry the pool for those who like to swim. Re is best when its scary that's why re2remake sold like hot cakes. Scare us to death capcom! Bring that anxiety and tension that made you famous for this franchise.
Ehh. That just your bog standard corporate nonsense. RE8 is the way it is because it was designed from the ground up to be an asset farm for the remake of 4.
If someone couldn’t finish RE7, they were a giant wimp.
@@SpadeDracohow was it an asset farm
@@ChazUBCS 8 was designed from the ground up to allow Capcom to reuse it's assets in 4.
If you think that them making a big artistic departure from 7 and that artistic leap just *happening* to involve 8 taking place in the exact same locales as 4 (Rustic Euro Village, Castle, Industrial Area) is a coincidence then you are incredibly naive.
@ didn’t say you weren’t right but how much asset farming really took place
Resident evil 1 remake remake ❤
I want to see Resident Evil Code Veronica Remake
I'm hoping we get Code Veronica next as a remake, as it's one of the craziest RE games, and has a lot of fun character development with Claire, Chris, and Wesker. I'm 42, and have been playing since the first games on PS1. I loved what they have done with the remakes, especially RE2. Though I'm not a fan of Leon and Claire constantly F-bombing while shooting zombies, lol. Their characters just don't strike me as talking like sailors, zombie outbreak or not. It took me out of the immersion because it was so frequent. I never hear anyone else complaining about it either, which I find odd. I mean, now and then sure, but it's like every monster you encounter. Other than that, I feel that remake is perfection. As for the fixed camera angles and tank controls, I think those factors served the older games better than say, the RE1 remake. Those elements were used to increase the suspense, and immersion, and to also fudge some things due to the graphical limitations. While I love RE1 remake, those two factors just didn't work for me the same way they did for the original PS1 games, I would be happy if they remade the 1st game again. My interest in Resident Evil 9 is very minimal, because I just could not get into RE7 at all (I tried, it did not feel like an RE game to me!), and I haven't even bothered with RE Village. I don't like the first person perspective at all for this series!
Code Veronica was awful and watered down a lot from its original scenario.
We sure don't need that Di Caprio charactere and his twin uzis, or these stupid jiraya like half tyrants to be back...
I don't mind another RE1 remake but it's time for Code Veronica first please cause its the only old school RE that didn't get a remake.
Code Veronica X looks Great. It looks Better than Og re4 on the Ps2 Graphically
@@hurricane7727No Resident Evil 4 beats Code Veronica being doesn't have a confusing paths and puzzles that have no clue to go. As least Resident Evil 4 got a fair path with puzzles that simple and fun without confusing path like Code Veronica original or X version.
@@Twilight17Petkoton I am talking about Graphics wise. I have played both games and Code Veronica X has Way Better Graphics
@hurricane7727 What graphics it's to dark, but Resident Evil 4 got graphics that can be light and later dark. You don't need Code Veronica, a graphics that too dark to see made no sense at all.
@Twilight17Petkoton I have played both and Code Veronica X has Better graphics and Feels like Resident Evil 1 Gameplay and Feel( Re1 was my first Re game).
Code Veronica was the true Resident Evil 4 as it completes the story of Claire finding her brother. And it even acknowledges Leon in the game before his encounter in RE4. And, RE5 is not the next chronological game. Revelations 1 happens before RE5. Don't forget that the 4 CGI movies are part of canon (Degeneration, etc). So, the next remakes should be the following in order to clean up the story:
1. RE 0
2. RE 1
3. Outbreak
4. Code Veronica
5. Revelations 1
6. RE 5
7. Revelations 2
8. RE 6 needs to be retconned.
Your post is solid regarding Resident Evil 4's awkward placement in the original Resident Evil series timeline.
With only a brief mention of Chris comparing the Majini's behavior to the Ganados from the Kennedy report and the appearance of the Las Plagas parasite, Resident Evil 4 could have easily been handwaved because that game's story had ZERO effects in the original Resident Evil timeline. Heck, had Resident Evil 4 just been Code Veronica, the Resident Evil 5 writers could just brushed off the Las Plagas parasite as something Wesker discovered in Spain and wouldn't have the effect story of Resident Evil 5. If players were interested, Capcom could have just put the whole discovery of it as a DLC episode.
I think the writer's decision to make the game a soft reboot for the franchise was, looking back, a very poor decision, and I'm glad the writers took the half-ass story (as admitted by RE4's original director) RE4 had and rewrote it from the ground up to make it actually fit in the Resident Evil timeline.
They really should do a new Resident Evil 1 Re-Remake especially with rumours of RE5 Remake but also because its rumoured that Jill will be in RE9 with Leon.
Outbreak Remake
This
CAPCOM NEED TO START LISTENING 🗣🗣
@@caseyjennings7420 facts
Long overdue
RE1 REREMake seems to be the best bet. They wouldn’t have to change the story. Just update graphics, get rid of fixed camera, and perhaps make the dialogue better
Besides, It’d be perfect to come out in 2026 to celebrate the 30th anniversary of the series!!!
also a canon ending.
I started with Resident Evil 4 Classic, played all the newer titles, and recently, for the first time, played and beat a "traditional" Resident Evil game-RE1 Remake. What I don’t get is that whenever I hear about how beloved the older “fixed-camera, tank-control” games are, fans often mention elements that aren’t really present in modern RE games.
It feels strange that traditional fans seem to wish for a game that might not fully capture what made the originals so special. For example, inventory management would likely be different with the inclusion of inventory pouches, and key items like the lighter might not even take up inventory space. You might not even need the lighter at all if you can dismember bodies with a knife.
I haven’t played other classic titles besides RE1 Remake, so I could be wrong, but based on my experience, RE1 Remake felt more like a puzzle game with a horror theme than a horror game with puzzles in it. There’s also a chance that puzzles might be simplified to make them easier to solve in a modern version. From what I remember, my biggest challenge wasn’t dealing with zombies-it was figuring out where to go, especially since the fixed camera angles sometimes obscured pathways.
That said, I’ve been a fan of all the remakes and modern games, so whatever they give us-whether it’s Code Veronica, RE1, or RE0-I’ll look forward to it. Even though RE5 is one of my favorites because of the co-op, it’s amazing how many games struggle to get co-op right. Despite being an older game, RE5 still has fantastic co-op mechanics.
the OG games were completely different, the were survival horror while RE4, 5, 6 & 8 are action horde shooters
Crimson Heads would be unneccessary in a new remake of RE1. They don't make sense and weren't featured in any other game.
I have loved the RE games since 1998 when I first played RE2, but I welcome changes with the remakes. If I wanted the same experience as the original games, I would just go and replay the original games. I play the remakes for the same story, but updated to match modern standards. Plus, as a grown adult I no longer have the patience for the old save system because I don't have as much time to game these days as I used to. Back then, I was fully able to replay RE2 58 times over. Now, I'm lucky if I get 2-3 replays in. Had it not been for Covid, I would have played RE3 a lot less than I did.
@@TokuAndAnimationNewsNetwork that's a horrible take and you just sound salty. companies like capcom make games for gamers, not for you
@@bepohal I'm sorry, was I talking to you? No, I actually wasn't. However, obviously I'm going to speak for myself. Why would I speak for everyone else? You sound like one of those insecure snowflakes who has lived their entire life on a cellphone and has no social awareness to interact with people as you think every differing opinion is a personal attack on you,
@ get outside and touch grass since you have a skill issue and „no time“ (which we both know is a code for „i‘m playing on assisted“). embarrassing kid
1 and 0 i think are the right move before resident evil code verónica an 5 .
I’m pretty sure I’m in the minority here (no pun intended lol)….but I honestly would LOVE an RE6 remake BUT DEFINITELY with ALOT of changes. Kind of a way to redeem itself:
1. Make it actually Scary lol. I think most will agree that Leon/Helena’s campaign was the closest to survival-horror out of the bunch but even that’s pushing it lol…even Ada’s can potentially be scarier. You can definitely make Jake/Sherry’s campaign a bit more horrifying especially with the Ustanak chasing you. Now Chris/Piers campaign might be a bit tricky given it’s damn near pure action with little to no horror but the developers can find a way to make it work.
2. Cut out the repetitiveness. Having to play some of the same missions over again just with a different team was annoying AF and kind of pointless. Just make them part of a certain teams campaign then have cut scenes to bridge the gap with the others🤷🏾♂️.
3. I know these are video games but let’s try to keep it maybe somewhat grounded in reality lol. I mean come on….the Jake/Sherry motorcycle chase, Leon hesitant to shoot the President after he’s clearly a zombie, fighting the giants but you have to jump onto them to pull out their vulnerable parts etc. 😂
So overall Those are pretty much the only real issues I had with the game but I’d love to hear what you all would suggest they change IF they were to remake RE6 😊
I don't so much care about which ones get remade next, but as far as quality of remakes goes I have the highest hopes for *Code Veronica and RE6. The writing* of the remakes has so far always improved alot over the originals and i thing CV and RE6 have the *most unrealized potential in the story department.* RE0 could be interesting aswell and aside from that I think something like a completely new RE Bravo team, that focusses on all the dying members of the RE1 crew could be interesting.
I think there's also room for *classic RE1 style remakes of the old games that already have new style remakes* and a new style remake for RE1. The genre of these games is completely different now, meaning they should also cover different markets.
I'm still wondering who that sharp dressed man in shades was because once he opened his mouth it sure wasn't Wesker. 😂
I want all of them to get a remake and I want all of them to get a virtual reality version
That’d be a dream come true
A Code Veronica Remake makes the most sense
I hate this Fake Remakes, I preferred Remaster of Umbrella’s Era (Resident Evil 1 Original, Resident Evil 2, Resident Evil 3 Original, Resident Evil: Code Veronica, Resident Evil: Outbreak 1, Resident Evil: Outbreak File 2 as Collector Edition for 120.00 USD while sold separately for 20.00 each.
Chronologically, wouldn't Code Veronica be before 5? Both in terms of release date and story?
I hope, if they do remake Code Veronica, they fix Steve’s character. I don’t want to see him try to make out with Claire when she’s asleep ever again
I wish It would be Code Veronica next
Capcom should make 9 about the takedown of Umbrella. Having it happen off screen is criminal. The popularity of the remakes shows people want those original characters back.
What Capcom really needs to do is this in this order;
Resident Evil 0 (REmake)
Resident Evil (REmake)
Resident Evil 3 (REmake Director’s Cut)
Resident Evil: Outbreak File 1 & 2 (REmake)
Resident Evil: Code Veronica (REmake)
Resident Evil: Revelations (REmake)
Resident Evil: Revelations 2 (REmake)
Then 5, & 6.
Then Operation Raccoon City (REmastered or REmake / Optional) [I just miss playing it w/ Friends.]
Resident evil remake > Resident evil 2&3 remakes. We need outbreak remakes.
Maybe they could do the Resident Evil 5 Remake and Code Veronica Remake like Remedy plans on doing Max Payne Remake and Max Payne 2 Remake, two games into one.
Re5 remake could be a series changer. Because they can choose to keep the Wesker alive or not. This is so important IMO
It makes sense to do RE CV before RE5 because people who have only played the Remakes aren’t even gonna now who Chris Redfield is. Either way which ever Remake they do Chris will be in it so all I gotta say is Please bring back Roger Craig Smith to voice Chris especially for RE5
That means they aren't Fans then prior to the Remakes. I have played Re1, Re 5 and Revelations including Marvel vs Capcom 3 games and know who Chris is.
2025 - RE1 remake with an RE0 dlc
Early 2026 - CV remake
Late 2026 - RE9
2027 - RE5 remake
Can y’all stop saying re0 dlc cause never happening
Wesker is the main reason why RE fans will never have Remake fatigue. He is so iconic
I need Outbreak to get a remake, honestly. Given modern times, with more persons with access to internet, 4-person coop campaign would be amazing.
i personally look most forward to resident evil 5 remake
I’d be interested in seeing what they could do with Resident Evil Code Veronica
I thought like Wesker was killed too soon. I really thought that he would go on from chapter to chapter. It just felt too soon for his demise in R.E 5
I am excited for more remakes unfortunately I have not liked the direction the games have gone 7 and 8 just doesn't feel like RE to me..
I agree...
RE1 with a first person/open world perspective would be really awesome! Sort of like RE7 but make it RE1 and do it even better than RE7. Wow, that would be killer!
Even though its already been remade, RE1 modern day would be nice. If that were to happen, I would want to see a canonical ending with Chris, Jill, Barry, and Rebecca
I think Capcom remaking RESIDENT EVIL -CODE VERONICA before remaking 5 would make a lot more sense since it would not only bring back Claire to the mainspotlight again but also help flesh out Wesker's character and personality and also his long time hatred for Chris i mean after his small participation in RE4R it wouldn't make sense to having in a game where out of nowhere he's the main villain and killed off ,CVR would give us a good introduction of him and also reasons to hate his guts,i also hope Capcom doesn't cut content from the original like they did to the P.R.L. 412 in RE4R,THE MERCENARIES mode from og RESIDENT EVIL 3 (1999) and also EXTREME BATTLE mode which was replaced by the GHOST SURVIVORS mode this change i didn't mind since it was neat mode to play but still...it would be nice if they had remaked that game as well! With a remake of CV I hope Capcom keeps the EXTREME BATTLE mode this time around they could keep Chris's facial model from RESIDENT EVIL 1 remake/rebirth the same they used in both RESIDENT EVIL-UMBRELLA CHRONICLES and RESIDENT EVIL-THE DARKSIDE CHRONICLES since he's younger in CODE VERONICA although it's very unlikely they would do that since Capcom keeps changing each RESIDENT EVIL protagonist's look every game
What is the thumbnail image from?
I hope they remake the outbreak games
I still think the best order for future remakes is RE 1, Code Veronica and then 5. I say that because as good as RE1 remake is, its not in over the shoulder style with the RE engine and most new players won't get the experience they want. Also doing it in that order gives best Wesker introduction.
Resident evil 5 was already simplified for modern gamers, those players need remakes on 0 ,1 , code v and outbreak so those will come first.
I'm so over the first person games, I really hope they don't make RE9 first person again. I didn't like the idea the first time, RE8 didn't make me like it, and RE9 won't either. Please Capcom, stick to 3rd person games for this series, or make spinoffs in first person.
I think going forward they'll probably make them both 1st and 3rd Person(since the RE8 3rd Person Mode works fine).
first person serves that genre the most
i reckon if its a new protagonist; they may do first person again which I hope they don't also - it is the RE7 director working on the game after all. But capcom must be thinking about the huge success of RE2remake, a 3rd person game that is 2yrs younger has already overtaken RE7's sale figures. Hopefully RE9 will be based on RE2's success. If the protagonist is an original main character; they'll likely have it in 3rd person.. because a lot of people will be annoyed they don't get to see their favourite character.. but who knows what they'll do..
@@88quickshot that's not true at all, lol
Going to keep hoping for Code Veronica 🤞
It would be really cool if they did a RE mercenaries free to play game and they have 5 maps from different RE games and 7 characters and it was multiplayer that would be epic and when a new season comes they add 2 new characters and costumes and maps
Resident evil outbreak should make a comeback
To build their new Albert Wesker, Capcom need to remake RE0 (especially if they consider Survivor "non canon") and Resident Evil 1.
But what I would love to see is a Outbreak remake, Capcom couldn't give us the "definitive Outbreak experience" due to techs limitations of the PS2 and DVDs.
Edit: I'm mostly interested by the single player mode of Outbreak.
Their profit-driven side will say 'remake the best games for $$$'. But the side that does it for the love of game will say 'remake the worst games to fix what went wrong'. Code Veronica, as a horrific piece of trash definitely needs the remake then, as there's the inkling of a good game in there dying to be released. It has potential.
I wish they would bring back the re4 director. His other franchise the evil withing was the closest to re4 we ever gotten and I love them
You would think that if they are giving this much detail for leaks of RE9... they would have mentioned if it was first or third person. I would think its quite important info.
I definitely want a RE5 remakes ( my favorite entry), I think understand the importance of CV, 0, & 1. Maybe after that we could see a DLC of outbreak, I always wanted to get into those two games
Just my opinion I really don't want Capcom to Remake Resident Evil again, the Game is amazing and doesn't need to be done again, I felt the same way with RE4 as well, and personally I don't like the new Resident Evil Remakes, not because of graphics they look gorgeous, not because of the horror being more scary I love horror, it's the F bombs I hate the F word believe me if you were me you would understand.
No, remakes is better than originals especially the flow of the stories. Capcom remaked RE for all new fans and players who didn't know their old games
@@mikkomonsales6653 that's your opinion and I respect that but I personally prefer the originals.
@@mikkomonsales6653yeah, no…
@@bepohal I respect his opinion.
@@theterribleclaw4285 that’s ok but it’s just not true
I notice that doing CV, then RE5, and then RE9 simultaneously alongside, keeps all the series "mains" in gamers' recent memory, and allows the hype from the remakes and the mainline games to feed each other. That magical "synergy" in my opinion.
The only challenge would be Capcom having the resources to staff three AAA efforts closely overlapping each other for a single franchise, and pulling them all off without major development snags screwing up the schedule.
They should remake them all from oldest to newest
Really hope code Veronica just sticks with the current gameplay style. If it’s not broken, don’t fix it
Og RE needs remake
I’m looking forward to being able to the prospect of playing remakes of RE1, RE0 and Code Veronica, I think they’ll be the next ones remade in that order.
I would hope they make 0, 1 or Code Veronica, though I wouldn't mind if they if they gained more experience unlocking graphics on PS5, practicing with RE 5 & 6 remakes.
dusk golem was the guy who said that re8 was running horrible on ps5 and people stopped trusting him as a leaker
You still stuck on that?
@Reggiezombiecop im stuck stepbro
@@ElKnoppers ok anything else darling
I honestly don’t think RE5 needs a remake at all . Compared to code Veronica , Zero and possibly RE1 again - RE5 is already done and it’s a lot more modern then those old school classics. We don’t need a RE5 remake
How about Rebecca Chambers gets a comeback first in RE0?
As someone who was introduced to RE through the original 1996 title and someone who has played through the remake as well. Also good to point out I love the re engine remakes , I totally believe in a re remake of part 1 coming out! I'd even like another remake of all these once the technology is even better than it is now these games are just too good and serve greatly to be upgraded when the time permits to be so. 1 to me is just such a damn good game that it just makes sense. With that said I look forward to everything being remade and of course the new entrys into the series.
RE5 for crying out loud
Off topic but I would love to see a RE game where we play as Hunk.
Still no Dino Crisis remakes
If they do a code Veronica remake, they should add a dlc bout the telling of Leon n krauser, it happened with the Wii/ps3 chronicals games n should fit nicely too
I want a remake of resident 0 remake
I hope they go in order for the Chris/Wesker Saga. 0, 1, CVX then RE5 Remake.
Its official i have clairvoyant definitely . Right 5 second before scrolling down to see this i was actually deeply thinking of recvx remake its coming confirmed
You gotta love the original style kept in re1 remake
But the modern touch would be very exciting
Really hope CV and Zero get the remake. I completely forget what the story was but i didn't even mind playing RE Dead Aim
7:26 see I’m the opposite I want to see an re2 remake like they did with resident evil 1
Resident evil outbreak is what im hoping for the most, but im so happy they finally rebooted. Onimusha absolutely love that franchise just as much as resident evil.
My brother is playing resident evil 4 on PlayStation 4. And I'm playing it on the Nintendo switch lite . 🎉❤😢😅we enjoying it . I played it as a kid
I hope RE Zero finally gets decanonized
No Resident Evil 3 Remake needs a remake... They did Jill Dirty with that DLC for $60.
Outbreak needs a remake
I don't get this idea that fixed camera angles are "outdated". They are not, its an artistic choice that perfectly fits the first RE game. Not every RE game should have that generic boring 3rd person over the shoulder camera. The "modern audience" should stop being so lazy, and scared of different gameplay styles. I was once a hater of that fixed camera but when I actually played RE Remake, I quickly fell in love with the fixed camera, the artstyle, graphics, atmosphere, soundtrack, the whole game. To all who haven't played it yet: That game is on PS4, PS5, Xboxes, Steam, give it a try.
I hope Capcom will not remake RE 1 again. It doesn't need a generic 3rd person over-the-shoulder remake. Any modern remake of that game would just be inferior to the 2002 game.