Jacob Becomes Israel Unnecessary hit. Gore did play pivotal role in the writing of enabling legislation that allowed digital technology and communication infrastructure built by the Department of Defense for the cold war to be available for civilian, commercial use without charging such high costs as to inhibit rapid adoption and development. Gore didn't 'invent' the technology. He was a midwife for the birth of the internet as a commercial and ultimately cultural force.
A very nice preamble and Vint Cerf looks so together himself. We do owe him and his cohorts so much. But the internet turned out to be like an automatic weapon! Depends on what you/we do with it. It is a shame to see how much of it is a sick waste of time (Twitter?? So well named!), but at the end of the day, what Mr Cerf didn't tell me was HOW TO MAKE USE OF IPv6 MYSELF!
IPv6 is taking a similar amount of time to deploy. Comparing IPv6 deployment to the IPv4 timeline we're at about 1996. The next few years should see a huge amount of further deployment. It will take about 20 years to be ubiquitous but it will be useful sooner than that as most content, ISP, and mobile access will support it before about 2020 or comparing with the IPv4 timeline, in 2000.
He's one of the guys who helped design and implement TCP/IP and if you bothered to listen to what he was saying IPv4 has 4.3 billion potential addresses. With mobile phones alone, there are now over 5 billion mobile phones. All of those need their own unique IP to connect to the internet. We need a larger internet (that being IPv6) in order to connect any and all devices currently AND in the future. Technology is all about the future, not just the moment.
Since 2000, almost all computers have had IPv6 protocols placed in their systems along with IPv4 protocols. They are not compatible protocols. It's called Dual-Stacking. As you type an email or document for attachment, the computer is using both protocols simultaneously to send it out over the internet. If a network has only IPv4, it will accept the message traffic that you've sent but IPv6 will become the norm. IPv6 is being implemented worldwide but it's going to take awhile.
IPv6 has just been in use since around June. IPv6 web addresses are now starting to be sold to companies. The transition to IPv6 is supposed to go unnoticed to not draw back from your browsing experienece.
Why do people instantly think when something changes it's going to be for the worse? This is essentially just an internet update. The same as updating a browser to keep up with updated hardware. There are no downsides to IPv6 and as an average internet user you won't notice a difference, this update allows us to keep access the internet we know and love.
Indeed. If anything IPv6 is the way to keep the Internet free and open, because the frontier land of address space is so large. There is opportunity for about anyone to set up a network and get a generous address allocation and become an ISP. Google is in the business of collecting all information ever and selling ads and services based on what they know. The free users are the product, perhaps, but that's true over IPv4 or IPv6.
I was really surprised to see that I was the first one. Google actually posted this on their Google+ page first, while the video was unlisted on TH-cam.
The current problem with IP version six or in terms of getting rid of IPv4 all together is that companies tend to stick to older technology its expensive to retrain methods also subnetting an IPv6 address space is a bit more complicated and it will require current IT people to relearn methods. BUT IPv6 far outweighs these issue in addressing space, inter-workings, and performance. It just takes time to implement these things especially in really large countries that take longer for new standards to take hold.
GeekMan IPv6 is not complicated, problem is ISPs need to rethink and rebuild logical part of there network, think out how to distribute those IPs to customers and especially make there customers switch to IPv6 flawlessly, since lot of them have there own routers. This requires time and planning.
Great video. IPv6 was explained very well. I just wish they would have pointed out some potential road blocks or growing pains associated with the transition to IPv6. Does anyone anticipate internet connection issues? bugs? glitches? compatibility issues?
oh, I know that :) I was just thinking over several hundred years, we'll search for IPv6 over NAT... and, again no, we'll still use IPv6 and NAT (for IPv4), It's not the end of version 4. Now, the change is more between ISPs, not the end-users... cheers!
one question why aint we using this so called ipv6 its on my computer but when i hook to the net it is using ipv4... i thought everyone already got transitioned into ipv6 back in 2006
I think they had something called IPv5 which was used for testing/prototype but this was way back and as far as I remember had nothing to do with IPv6. Google it. For the rest of saying - or we can just do this or that with IPv4...yes we can but we are just adding more and more and making networking more and more complex. It's easier and requires less computer processing to just update the IP layer.
Because that makes it more difficult to connect to other devices directly and it is exactly what we are trying to get away from. Adding MORE complication and layers that must be navigated through to reach each destination is the opposite of what we should be aiming for.
Vint Cerf is a technology evangelist (that technology being the Internet which he is considered the father of) is a person who attempts to build a critical mass of support for a given technology in order to establish it as a technical standard in a market that is subject to network effects.
I see what you did there! for the rest of us: Wikipedia says that Vint Cerf is often described as "The Father of the Internet"... aka he is the original OG architect of the internet. (Helmut Bakaitis, Played "The Architect" in the movie). It's cool to see that Cerf is around for the Interwebs RELOADED.
Quite to the contrary, Vincent Cerf has fought quite a bit (among others) to keep net neutrality afloat, which basically stops the transport companies from double dipping and/or creating a laddered access approach to the Internet. Coming back to IPv6, using NAT to put off moving to IPv6 just adds unnecessary layers of complexity to the transport, adds more latency, and complicates the design/maintenance of apps, online games. The truth is, if we want to move forward, this has to happen.
Already done on all my administrated projects thanks to cloudflare's technology ;) Of course native ipv6 with follow up as soon as the datacenters finally launch them and software's are finally adjusted to work with it.
(Straight from Google's IPv6 FAQs) Version 5 was reserved for the Internet Stream Protocol developed prior to IPv6-it was never widely deployed and will not be used publicly.
From Google's page: Version 5 was reserved for the Internet Stream Protocol developed prior to IPv6-it was never widely deployed and will not be used publicly.
To put it even more into perspective, we could assign almost 670 000 IP addresses *per square nanometer* of the Earth's surface (and the size of a hydrogen atom in comparison is about 0.1 nanometers).
IPv6 was not released today. The IPv6 specification has been around for over 15 years, which is open and available for you to read for yourself. Companies are finally implementing the technology today, and it is about time.
I think your question is..as an end user what should you do to help IPv6 adoption and the answer is that personally there is nothing you "need" to do. Your computer is already set up to use IPv6 addresses. The main issues with adoption lie in service providers and underlying infrastructure of the internet. If you want more information do a google search on "barriers to ipv6 adoption".
For people asking about IPv5, "Version 5 was reserved for the Internet Stream Protocol developed prior to IPv6-it was never widely deployed and will not be used publicly." - Google
No idea about ADSL modems, but my GPON modem works w/ IPv6 just fine (and I don't think if there's something so very different about ADSL that'd make it impossible)
The reason they were dynamic is lack of addresses to save space... if they have unlimited amount of ip addresses, the users CAN have a dedicated one or companies CAN assign static ip addresses without having to worry about or planning for "running out of addresses" situation. CCTV watch you walking down a street and then what? Spying on a person's browsing habits, shopping, doing personal things, chatting, emails, videos, pictures is MUCH more serious issue than what a cctv presents.
Now the question is, how would it affect us the ones that already got the ones working? So it's like giving internet a bigger space? why should we know about the change?
They can always trace it back to an IP address or IPv6 address in this case, you would probably have a very static ip as opposed to dynamically assigned.
O Pai da Internet, Vint Cerf pessoalmente, explica por que o IPv6 é essencial para o crescimento da internet! A insfraestrutura precisa crescer para que não cessem os serviços. MARAVILHOSO O PAI ESTAR VIVO E ELE MESMO PODER EXPLICAR A MUTAÇÃO DA SUA CRIAÇÃO, A EVOLUÇÃO! Como um pai vendo uma filha progredindo! Obs: digo filha, por que tenho duas...crescendo, amadurecendo!
If you're thinking of the announcement of the World Wide Web, that happened August 6th (1991). Did something else important happen on June 6th that year? There doesn't seem to be any major events that day - that year at least. Tetris was released June 6th in 1984. Oh, and D-Day was June 6th as well.
They can not allow the views to keep going up in case someone is using some type of bot to boost their views. So they stop it around 300 and check to make sure the views are real, once they finish checking they go ahead and allow the view counter to catch up. It simply takes time to crunch that much data, usually it is gonna within a few hours.
So like IPv5 is still going to be around until IPv6 is fully adopted or will it be like .htm and .html5xversiononandon and everything will stay adopted for a while. We been through like 2 or so more iterations, I don't think we'd really noticed.
Why wasn't this done 10 years ago when everyone was talking about the need to move to IPv6. I've heard about this "move" since 2000. Why hasn't anyone done this yet outside of isolated places like Sweden? We've had IPv6 capable devices, servers, routers (enterprise and consumer), operating systems, etc since at least 2003.
And yes, I'm aware of the difference between internal and external IP addresses. I'm basically thinking here that this could do away a need for internal IPs or something.
IP-free internet means that computers will not have IDs. Essentially that means a server can be connected by any computer from anywhere. Administrators wouldn't be able to block/ban hackers, and your internet browser wouldn't know which exact server you wanted to go.
Considering how the Wachowski brothers were put so much detail in the matrix movies... i guess it´s not a coincidence that the architect looks exactly like him. Because... well... he is the architect. XD
He looks like The Architect.
Not look. He is the Architect.
He co-created TCP/IP and helped design the Internet.
Avenue X at Cicero Funny. He doesn't look like Al Gore!
Jacob Becomes Israel Unnecessary hit. Gore did play pivotal role in the writing of enabling legislation that allowed digital technology and communication infrastructure built by the Department of Defense for the cold war to be available for civilian, commercial use without charging such high costs as to inhibit rapid adoption and development.
Gore didn't 'invent' the technology. He was a midwife for the birth of the internet as a commercial and ultimately cultural force.
Avenue X at Cicero Got it backwards, The Architect looks like him. I think that was intentional.
Digital thanks Vint Cerf for this concise, short explanation of IPv6 and its need!
Of course at the beginning of the Internet it was impossible to imagine that so many devices will be connected. :-)
A very nice preamble and Vint Cerf looks so together himself. We do owe him and his cohorts so much. But the internet turned out to be like an automatic weapon!
Depends on what you/we do with it. It is a shame to see how much of it is a sick waste of time (Twitter?? So well named!), but at the end of the day, what Mr Cerf didn't tell me was HOW TO MAKE USE OF IPv6 MYSELF!
@alysdexia and how do you do that?
IPv6 is taking a similar amount of time to deploy. Comparing IPv6 deployment to the IPv4 timeline we're at about 1996. The next few years should see a huge amount of further deployment. It will take about 20 years to be ubiquitous but it will be useful sooner than that as most content, ISP, and mobile access will support it before about 2020 or comparing with the IPv4 timeline, in 2000.
He's one of the guys who helped design and implement TCP/IP and if you bothered to listen to what he was saying IPv4 has 4.3 billion potential addresses. With mobile phones alone, there are now over 5 billion mobile phones. All of those need their own unique IP to connect to the internet.
We need a larger internet (that being IPv6) in order to connect any and all devices currently AND in the future. Technology is all about the future, not just the moment.
There are more IPv6 addresses than there are stars in the observable universe. We're not going to run out.
Well done for going to the Q&A section unlike most people who just start asking the same questions elsewhere :)
What reason does anybody have to dislike this video?...
Since 2000, almost all computers have had IPv6 protocols placed in their systems along with IPv4 protocols. They are not compatible protocols. It's called Dual-Stacking. As you type an email or document for attachment, the computer is using both protocols simultaneously to send it out over the internet. If a network has only IPv4, it will accept the message traffic that you've sent but IPv6 will become the norm. IPv6 is being implemented worldwide but it's going to take awhile.
IPv6 has just been in use since around June. IPv6 web addresses are now starting to be sold to companies. The transition to IPv6 is supposed to go unnoticed to not draw back from your browsing experienece.
Why do people instantly think when something changes it's going to be for the worse? This is essentially just an internet update. The same as updating a browser to keep up with updated hardware. There are no downsides to IPv6 and as an average internet user you won't notice a difference, this update allows us to keep access the internet we know and love.
Indeed. If anything IPv6 is the way to keep the Internet free and open, because the frontier land of address space is so large. There is opportunity for about anyone to set up a network and get a generous address allocation and become an ISP.
Google is in the business of collecting all information ever and selling ads and services based on what they know. The free users are the product, perhaps, but that's true over IPv4 or IPv6.
That's awesome. Expanding the Internet and getting everyone online is so great.
The problem is that he did. He is one of the people who invented the internet. Good job.
I was really surprised to see that I was the first one. Google actually posted this on their Google+ page first, while the video was unlisted on TH-cam.
The current problem with IP version six or in terms of getting rid of IPv4 all together is that companies tend to stick to older technology its expensive to retrain methods also subnetting an IPv6 address space is a bit more complicated and it will require current IT people to relearn methods. BUT IPv6 far outweighs these issue in addressing space, inter-workings, and performance. It just takes time to implement these things especially in really large countries that take longer for new standards to take hold.
GeekMan IPv6 is not complicated, problem is ISPs need to rethink and rebuild logical part of there network, think out how to distribute those IPs to customers and especially make there customers switch to IPv6 flawlessly, since lot of them have there own routers. This requires time and planning.
hard to subnet?? It so easy. There is fixed 16 bits only for subnetting!
Great video. IPv6 was explained very well. I just wish they would have pointed out some potential road blocks or growing pains associated with the transition to IPv6. Does anyone anticipate internet connection issues? bugs? glitches? compatibility issues?
I like how important this change was but I didn't even notice it happen.
oh, I know that :) I was just thinking over several hundred years, we'll search for IPv6 over NAT... and, again no, we'll still use IPv6 and NAT (for IPv4), It's not the end of version 4. Now, the change is more between ISPs, not the end-users... cheers!
one question why aint we using this so called ipv6 its on my computer but when i hook to the net it is using ipv4... i thought everyone already got transitioned into ipv6 back in 2006
I think they had something called IPv5 which was used for testing/prototype but this was way back and as far as I remember had nothing to do with IPv6. Google it.
For the rest of saying - or we can just do this or that with IPv4...yes we can but we are just adding more and more and making networking more and more complex. It's easier and requires less computer processing to just update the IP layer.
Because that makes it more difficult to connect to other devices directly and it is exactly what we are trying to get away from. Adding MORE complication and layers that must be navigated through to reach each destination is the opposite of what we should be aiming for.
Today June 6th is the 2nd anniversary of IPv6 :).
Muchos le debemos nuestra forma de vida a ese señor... el "Padre" de la internet!
Mainly in this video its about that the mobilphones took part in the less amount of IPv4 adresses. Almost no word lost about usual computer engines.
that's incredible. he made the internet
and i just saw him. duuuuude. that's awesome. i salute you, internet creator.
IPv6 has exactly 340,282,366,920,938,463,463,374,607,431,768,211,456 addresses.
Vint Cerf is a technology evangelist (that technology being the Internet which he is considered the father of) is a person who attempts to build a critical mass of support for a given technology in order to establish it as a technical standard in a market that is subject to network effects.
Vint Cerf, a father of the internet?.. Sir you are my hero!
Muto's good that each day grows more and more
OMG you're so right ! I didn't notice it until I saw your comment !
I see what you did there!
for the rest of us: Wikipedia says that Vint Cerf is often described as "The Father of the Internet"... aka he is the original OG architect of the internet. (Helmut Bakaitis, Played "The Architect" in the movie). It's cool to see that Cerf is around for the Interwebs RELOADED.
Aw an awesome old Google logo 💓💓💓
Quite to the contrary, Vincent Cerf has fought quite a bit (among others) to keep net neutrality afloat, which basically stops the transport companies from double dipping and/or creating a laddered access approach to the Internet.
Coming back to IPv6, using NAT to put off moving to IPv6 just adds unnecessary layers of complexity to the transport, adds more latency, and complicates the design/maintenance of apps, online games.
The truth is, if we want to move forward, this has to happen.
Already done on all my administrated projects thanks to cloudflare's technology ;) Of course native ipv6 with follow up as soon as the datacenters finally launch them and software's are finally adjusted to work with it.
So nicely explained, much needed "IPv6".
Oh yeah, I was wondering when this was going to happen.
Thanks Vinton...
(Straight from Google's IPv6 FAQs)
Version 5 was reserved for the Internet Stream Protocol developed prior to IPv6-it was never widely deployed and will not be used publicly.
From Google's page:
Version 5 was reserved for the Internet Stream Protocol developed prior to IPv6-it was never widely deployed and will not be used publicly.
Ipv6 adresses are so hard to remember and why cant we extend ipv4 adresses from something like 62.85.4.21 to something like 62.85.4.5.21
If you need to remember it just get some free DNS domain, like duckdns.org
So it was launched on 06-06 & its called IPv6. In brief, 6,6,6.Interesting coincidence. :)
Would we have longer IP addresses? How does it work? What will make the capacity larger?
To put it even more into perspective, we could assign almost 670 000 IP addresses *per square nanometer* of the Earth's surface (and the size of a hydrogen atom in comparison is about 0.1 nanometers).
More people need to know about this.
I just love the way Google explains these things.
IPv6 was not released today. The IPv6 specification has been around for over 15 years, which is open and available for you to read for yourself. Companies are finally implementing the technology today, and it is about time.
I think your question is..as an end user what should you do to help IPv6 adoption and the answer is that personally there is nothing you "need" to do. Your computer is already set up to use IPv6 addresses. The main issues with adoption lie in service providers and underlying infrastructure of the internet. If you want more information do a google search on "barriers to ipv6 adoption".
On very popular videos (like this one), view count is only refreshed once in every few hours, while like counter is refreshed every few minutes.
if so many addresses has IPv6, just think about IPv6 with NAT :) i'm just preventing the far future... and yeah, great video
cool thanks, wasn't sure when it was going off memory.
Truely amazing! Brilliant work by a website that does more than any company in the world! #googlefan till I die!
how did you come up with 85 years? ipv6 will never overmax. its way too big
Been waiting for IPV6 about 10 years now.
The way he talks about it, it seems like something the ISP does on its own.
For people asking about IPv5, "Version 5 was reserved for the Internet Stream Protocol developed prior to IPv6-it was never widely deployed and will not be used publicly." - Google
No idea about ADSL modems, but my GPON modem works w/ IPv6 just fine (and I don't think if there's something so very different about ADSL that'd make it impossible)
The reason they were dynamic is lack of addresses to save space... if they have unlimited amount of ip addresses, the users CAN have a dedicated one or companies CAN assign static ip addresses without having to worry about or planning for "running out of addresses" situation. CCTV watch you walking down a street and then what? Spying on a person's browsing habits, shopping, doing personal things, chatting, emails, videos, pictures is MUCH more serious issue than what a cctv presents.
I spent 3 Months learning this stuff
Now the question is, how would it affect us the ones that already got the ones working? So it's like giving internet a bigger space? why should we know about the change?
Thank you Vint Cerf
They can always trace it back to an IP address or IPv6 address in this case, you would probably have a very static ip as opposed to dynamically assigned.
Thanks for telling me what the "New, larger version of the internet" is(!) -__-
Finally, it won't be so hard to get IP's for servers...
Estaría interesante que la divulgación de tales eventos fuese en todos los idiomas posibles..Gracias..父
O Pai da Internet, Vint Cerf pessoalmente, explica por que o IPv6 é essencial para o crescimento da internet! A insfraestrutura precisa crescer para que não cessem os serviços.
MARAVILHOSO O PAI ESTAR VIVO E ELE MESMO PODER EXPLICAR A MUTAÇÃO DA SUA CRIAÇÃO, A EVOLUÇÃO!
Como um pai vendo uma filha progredindo!
Obs: digo filha, por que tenho duas...crescendo, amadurecendo!
If you're thinking of the announcement of the World Wide Web, that happened August 6th (1991). Did something else important happen on June 6th that year? There doesn't seem to be any major events that day - that year at least. Tetris was released June 6th in 1984. Oh, and D-Day was June 6th as well.
You don't transfer, it does it by itself, its the internet that is changing, not simply your single computer
Its cool how he works for Google and a founder of the internet
They can not allow the views to keep going up in case someone is using some type of bot to boost their views. So they stop it around 300 and check to make sure the views are real, once they finish checking they go ahead and allow the view counter to catch up. It simply takes time to crunch that much data, usually it is gonna within a few hours.
he made the internet
really
look it up
okay maybe he's just one of the founding fathers, but you get the idea.
So like IPv5 is still going to be around until IPv6 is fully adopted or will it be like .htm and .html5xversiononandon and everything will stay adopted for a while.
We been through like 2 or so more iterations, I don't think we'd really noticed.
C'est vraiment important, alors soyez au part
Why wasn't this done 10 years ago when everyone was talking about the need to move to IPv6. I've heard about this "move" since 2000. Why hasn't anyone done this yet outside of isolated places like Sweden? We've had IPv6 capable devices, servers, routers (enterprise and consumer), operating systems, etc since at least 2003.
"Rest assured, this will be the sixth time we are releasing a new internet protocol and we have become exceedingly efficient at it."
and we have become exceedingly efficient at it
Long live the architect Vint Cerf, also famous for the words: ergo concordantly and visa vis ;)
Just more space. It's the same as if a small town only had 4 digit phone numbers, and as it grew, everyone's number was changed to a 6 digit one.
as long as i can still watch youtube i'm good
yeah
And yes, I'm aware of the difference between internal and external IP addresses. I'm basically thinking here that this could do away a need for internal IPs or something.
great, me parece que ya era hora de ese pequeño gran cambio :D
that's what some ISPs are already doing, especially in very densely populated countries (USA, China, and similar)
It's funny every time i see Vint Cerf talking is about his early experimental mistake. :)
IP-free internet means that computers will not have IDs. Essentially that means a server can be connected by any computer from anywhere. Administrators wouldn't be able to block/ban hackers, and your internet browser wouldn't know which exact server you wanted to go.
I'm concerned whether will Internet Explorer 6 work under IPv6 ^_^
A question, will it have any adverse effect on us, the IPV6?
Because of how the network communication occurs. To make it simple, your computer needs to know beforehand how long that IP address is.
Great, now I'm never going to look at him the same way again.
The beginning reminded me of an Apple product introduction
Is anything gonna change for the consumer?
I almost inclined to believe this will bring on the zombie apocalypse and hunger games
That's what they said in 1978
Finally my android will have an ip addy! Finally can see it on my network.
I understood nothing, but i feel this is good.
we still have time for that, but i can't really see which problems would arise in the year 2012000
IPv5 was an experimental version of IP that was used only in the Internet Streaming Protocol, which was experimental and is no longer used.
Considering how the Wachowski brothers were put so much detail in the matrix movies... i guess it´s not a coincidence that the architect looks exactly like him.
Because... well... he is the architect. XD
But when I go online, I check the modem and it says the connection type to WAN is IPv4; can someone explain, please?
So, why don't they just use a byte per number in IPv4? They would only have to slightly modify how addresses are calculated.