I have an '88 Corvette so I know about low ground clearance issues and I can tell you those marks are from the road and not the truck. Here's likely what happened... Plaintiff, happy with his newly restored Delorean, signs off and then takes it for a drive after finally getting it at long last. Who wouldn't? Not used to the clearance yet, he bottoms out once or twice going down the road over an uneven section of pavement. Then he sees the damage and next day decides the truck guy's insurance should pay for the fix... which is not $4k by the way. I'm willing to bet money that's how it went down.
Probably wanted 4k so he got the car shipped for free. The plaintiff a real knucklehead. You can tell he used to getting his own way. A couple of marriages and life will straighten him out.
@@Ralphbo-u6l little boy got greedy and to big for his briggits - I bet the $2,400 the insurance company offered sounds great now…. Little puke. Funny how his mommy was by his side for his big day… the fact he signed for it, whatever..’I sign shit all the time I don’t read (it’s like betting, never wage more than you’re willing to lose?) BUT tipped the guy, took selfies and then went out for drinks afterwards - I’m sure his mommy nursed him and powdered his bum once they got back to the hotel room and he was told how the judge was mean and didn’t understand him as well as his mommy did and it wasn’t his fault. Little Norman Bates in the making
15:35 what a burn! The insurance company offer him $2,400 for a couple of scratches and he said NO! Greed is a hell of a drug! I hope the defendant contacts his insurance company and tells them the outcome of the case so they won't pay out to this entitled scammer!
The insurance never offered $2400, that’s what the claims adjuster assessed the damage at. The insurance company compromised and offered $700 and then $1000. Try and listen next time.
The weird part is, signing a waiver and noticing damages after does happen, the driver’s insurance even offered him $2400 and instead of taking it because he should have known he had a weaker case for signing a document and giving a tip, he decided to say no and come here…. Hmmmm he may be smart, but clearly not stream smart.
@@LeeoGoneWild The insurance company offered him $700 and then $1,000, never the $2,400. You could make the case he didn't notice the damage at the time of delivery, except he literally claims he witnessed it being damaged haha.
Doubtful, she would have been talking or trying to. Even she knew this was pointless and you can clearly see it on her face. Also, just because a male brings their mother to court does not mean they are a momma's boy. She was co-owner of the car something you clearly missed.
@@jessicapearson9479 I’ve participated as a juror a couples of times since I was in high school til mid college and trust me, there’s a lot of cases where parents encourages, uses, and convinces their kid(s) to sue someone.
People get so greedy and indignant, and it screws them every time. She's super fair. I love it when she actually adds punitive sometimes on the really bad ones.
After he said I was emotional or whatever for the third time. Died laughing when the judge says so we don’t need to hold you to the standards of an adult LMFAO 😂
The thing is no one really knows when it got damaged because he signed that document. I think the plaintiff saw the damage AFTER he got it home, so he assumed it was the truck, but there's a chance it can be something else. The defendant can freely think the same because the guy is telling him after he already left.
Honestly I think (as another commenter put it) he took it for a ride once it was home, damaged it and decided to sue the defendant to cover the damages and made up this story that he saw it get damaged by the truck
The defendant did all he could do legally to release the car and acknowledge damage for insurance compensation. The plaintiff refused $2500. Dumb after dumb.
He didn’t purchase the DeLorean, as he explained, it was gifted to him, partially, by his father. His mother co-owns the car, as well. He possibly used $20K of inheritance money for the restoration. But he signed a waiver and that is a binding contract.
The defendant filed a counter just because he was sued 😆. The plaintiff is pulling strings. He has no idea what happened. If the undercarriage is fiberglass like he says then just driving would scratch it. There are so many rocks and things on the roads. He just does not have the money to fix it.
it could have happened but it’s on the owner to thoroughly look at the car- the undercarriage sir - pick n choose your battles- it’s 6 inches it’s bound to get damaged
How does it make sense to sue when the insurance company offered a settlement? That was such a dumb gamble and shows what happens when people think based upon emotion. Not the defendant admitting he was trying to get his 5 racks 😂😂😂😂
The insurance never offered $2400, that’s what the claims adjuster assessed the damage at. The insurance company compromised and offered $700 and then $1000. Try and listen next time.
That plaintiff was such a liar, I wonder how much of his story was even true? It definitely couldn't have been "Mint Condition" with that huge list of previously existing damage on the waiver. I have doubts as to his whole story about earning the car from his dad with good grades. And come on! It's INCREDIBLY obvious that he just didn't notice it happen or was too scared to bring it up until waiting a day.
10:32 I to would be very emotional receiving a car that my parents owned. He's a huge loser and I'm shocked that his mother let him proceed with this nonsense, or maybe that's how she raised him?
What I truly believe is that after the truck driver left and the plaintiff was checking out his car all excited about everything, is when he noticed the damage. I don't doubt the plaintiff was watching the truck driver take his car off the truck and probably came to the conclusion the damage happened when it was being driven off of the truck.
Prob 9 out of 10 people didn't even know the joke of you built a time machine out of a delorian when the movie came out.. also even now most people don't specifically think the name of the car just it's just the full wing doors and look of the car not the make and model..
Unfortunately I get where the plaintiff is coming, I’ve actually had multiple customers sign the delivery receipt for a shipment confirming no damages, EVEN THOUGH there were damages. They sign it and then they’d email me stating it was damaged and what to do and I would have to reach out to the carrier and they’re like, “ummm they signed this document stating no damages.” I don’t know exactly why…. But people ABSOLUTELY sign that form even though there are damages upon delivery.
I actually got invited to be on The People’s Court for a similar situation. The guys who delivered my washer damaged a wall in my condo during the delivery. My boyfriend signed the waiver saying everything was okay with the washer. Then the appliance company refused to pay for the wall, claiming that they had a waiver. Unfortunately for them, the waiver was for the appliance, but the delivery drivers damaged a wall. We filed a lawsuit against the appliance company. That’s when The People’s Court reached out to us. We turned them down and settled out of court with the appliance company. But I always wonder what would’ve happened if we went on the show.
@@mikesteele05 Ex boyfriend, I hope? Lol jk jk…. Oh wow, that’s crazy and I’m glad the contract stated damages to the appliance and not to the home, which was perfect for your case. That would have been interesting on People’s Court, I wonder if she would have caught that and told him to pay or sided in his favor, hm. My dad was also asked to be on People’s court do to a rental issue and he declined it too haha.
Cause the cars here I want my car no more issue sign but you can’t sign then say there’s damage that’s the whole point of the form if there’s damage don’t sign oh but they want the car so they sign
I once had a xbox repaired under warranty and sent back to me and it was suppose to be sign stating no damage and the security tape was still sealed. The driver drop it off in such a hurry knocked a planter of the porch and took off. Package was damaged and resealed. I called fed-ex and they stated it didn't need to be signed for. plug it in and it started to smoke so i called microsoft up and told them what happen and they said yes it was supposed to sign for and they will take care of it. They paid for me to send it back next day and i received another one a week later.
Plaintiff signed the waiver, allowed defendant to take pictures with the car and gave him a tip after witnessing the defendant damage his car !?!!🤔 🤯 Yeah right 😂😂😂
Three things… 1. The Plaintiff signed a waiver of no damage and obviously wasn’t too upset to not take pics of the Defendant in the DeLorean and have him a tip. 2. The Plaintiff was offered $2500 to settle from an insurance company…which is incredible. 3. The Plaintiff was an idiot for not taking the offer from the insurance company and walking away.
The insurance never offered $2400, that’s what the claims adjuster assessed the damage at. The insurance company compromised and offered $700 and then $1000. Try and listen next time.
@@missandei151 Thats different though, its one thing if they come with you but to stand right next to you and hold your hand(I know not literally) but you can stand by yourself like a grown up.....but having other with your for moral support is different
@@simpleexpressions13 So if a friend stood next to you it's okay, but not if it's family? Or is it the standing next to someone? I'm 41 years old, mother of two grown sons, but If I were in court (and on tv!) I would be very nervous and would very much like some support by my side. You act like I would have to revert back to my teenager years telling my mother "nooo mooooom, it would be embarrassing if my mother stood next to me", come on now.
The plaintiff shot him self in the Foot and in the Hand when he signed that waiver. And the look on his face when the defendant showed proof that he signed a waiver. 🤦♂️
I actually got invited to be on The People’s Court for a similar situation. The guys who delivered my washer damaged a wall in my condo during the delivery. My boyfriend signed the waiver saying everything was okay with the washer. Then the appliance company refused to pay for the wall, claiming that they had a waiver. Unfortunately for them, the waiver was for the appliance, but the delivery drivers damaged a wall. We filed a lawsuit against the appliance company. That’s when The People’s Court reached out to us. We turned them down and settled out of court with the appliance company. But I always wonder what would’ve happened if we went on the show.
plaintiff has A LOT! of talk, just not believing him, defendant seems like a VERY! responsible business owner; thinking that under carriage damage was already there.
Clearly you didn't bother to listen to the judge. She clearly stated that he was just suing because he was sued. She knew what was going on. She gave him the money because the plaintiff was lying and trying to scam her court. Try to pay better attention before making assumptions. Why do you think he said WOW when she gave him the judgement? He honestly thought she would throw his counter claim out. He was surprised she didn't.
@@jessicapearson9479 You need to rewatch the end. The judge ruled in the defendant’s favor regarding the complaint but did not award him the counterclaim. We all make mistakes Sweetie. 😏
This exact same thing happened to me at a body shop. Shop painted my car and after Inspection outside, noticed imperfections. Told shop and they supposedly would repaint. After week went back and they would not take car out of booth for inspection. Noticed same imperfections and asked to take outside to see in sun and they refused. They state to sign approval right there otherwise they will sell car in auction to force me to sign waiver. Sued and only won partial. Sometimes you just can't trust people.
I have a saying that I came up with whenever my parents were each in the hospital , and that was “nice doesn’t get the job done “. Meaning that no matter how nice a person is it doesn’t mean they are doing their job correctly.
The judge called the plaintiff "Son" how rude. If anyone calls her ma'am or miss, she has a convulsion. The plaintiff refused a $2400 settlement. What a Fool.
The insurance never offered $2400, that’s what the claims adjuster assessed the damage at. The insurance company compromised and offered $700 and then $1000. Try and listen next time.
The transporter damaged the DeLorean when he PICKED IT UP in NY, BEFORE he drove it to FL. That's why it took him 45 minutes to take it OFF the transporter. truck. The plaintiff did NOT examine the undercarriage when the car was delivered. The transporter noted the other existing exterior scratches upon inspection BEFORE he hooked the car up onto the truck. He DID NOT SEE the damage occurring to the undercarriage as he pulled the car up because he was INSIDE the truck. He may have heard the scraping as it happened but he did NOT note undercarriage damage as it was NOT preexisting. He caused it, while pulling the car up onto the truck, and he would be foolish to indict himself if it was likely the plaintiff would NOT examine underneath when he received the car. If the transporter picked the car up with no problem, it would NOT have taken him 45 minutes to deliver the car without it scraping the undercarriage a second time. ***The transporter needed special LONGER RAMPS to keep such a low car from bottoming out when it was towed onto or off the truck. Few cars require such ramps and that's why he didn't have them handy when he picked up the car.***
@@twilliams842 It's called COMMON SENSE and a knowledge of geometry, transporting vehicles, and human behavior. LONGER RAMPS are needed for safe loading and unloading low-slung sports-cars. Nose up to load or unload? Back end hits and drags on the ground unless the angle is decreased by using an extended ramp to keep the back end off the ground. Simple solution but often ignored.
I really dislike how she be yelling and taking over the litigants! Let the man explain his case from his pov. She asks him a question and then keeps talking and yelling, never giving him a chance to explain. This is crazy 😧. I wouldn't want her as a judge
I’m pretty sure those scratches were probably already there from when his dad owned it 6 inches off the ground is very low it’s practically a low rider and any bump or entry way to a parking lot would easily rub on the bottom of the car. Plus if he thought the transporter scratched it on delivery he shouldn’t have signed the damage release form saying it was all good. This guys trying to get his car fixed after the fact if it was damaged he shouldn’t have singed the form. I don’t think the transporter did anything he even written down what he saw before he delivered it so that even points to all this being there when his dad owned it.
I love driving nice cars. I find great joy in owning and cruising in sport or luxury automobiles. I would never be able to relax in a car so low to the ground. It would never be a fun drive.
Hopefully the plaintiff at least learned a lesson from this about waivers. No matter how much you “respectfully disagree” it’s still signed and agreed to. Don’t sign the waiver or at least write on it at the time what the damage is prior to signing. Once that waiver is signed with no note of damages the person who delivered is off the hook.
People take material crap way too seriously. And collector's items are ridiculous. Keep it in a storage or something if you want to prevent any damage. This will inevitably happen.
maybe he should go back to the future and redo it. a car that sat for years and a collectors item needs 20 thousand in restoration. and you're worried about scratches underneath
He should get loss wages and something for the aggravation. He's right, if people see him as someone who damages cars during transport they won't do business with him
8:16 Makes absolutely no sense! The entire undercarriage of the vehicle is messed up... "Sign this waiver of damage? There's no place to note the undercarriage damage...but everything else is good." *signs waiver of damage*
Even 6 inches is very low, going over a slight hump in the road will do a lot of damage, having to put down extra tracks to get the car off the transporter sounds dodgy enough, what about when the car was put ON the transporter, did they use wider tracks? Goes to prove that people sign documents without reading them, mind you the Insurance Companies make them long-winded and several pages long with extra small print to put you off.
WEST SIDE! Lol I love the defendant showing up with his blood pressure report.
lol I just busted out laughing when he said that omgg lol
Not worth $5k, though!
I fucking died laughing at the end
Made me choke on my chicken 😂 sandwich when he said
Baby I died lmao
I have an '88 Corvette so I know about low ground clearance issues and I can tell you those marks are from the road and not the truck. Here's likely what happened... Plaintiff, happy with his newly restored Delorean, signs off and then takes it for a drive after finally getting it at long last. Who wouldn't? Not used to the clearance yet, he bottoms out once or twice going down the road over an uneven section of pavement. Then he sees the damage and next day decides the truck guy's insurance should pay for the fix... which is not $4k by the way. I'm willing to bet money that's how it went down.
That's exactly what I was going to say. Big joyride after getting the car, then..
"Oh, $#!£, can't tell the folks what I did," So here we are.
Yeah, I bottomed out in a 1984 Fiero trying to show out one time and I was riding on 1 inch low profile Pirrellie tires.
Probably wanted 4k so he got the car shipped for free. The plaintiff a real knucklehead. You can tell he used to getting his own way. A couple of marriages and life will straighten him out.
@@Ralphbo-u6l little boy got greedy and to big for his briggits - I bet the $2,400 the insurance company offered sounds great now…. Little puke. Funny how his mommy was by his side for his big day… the fact he signed for it, whatever..’I sign shit all the time I don’t read (it’s like betting, never wage more than you’re willing to lose?) BUT tipped the guy, took selfies and then went out for drinks afterwards - I’m sure his mommy nursed him and powdered his bum once they got back to the hotel room and he was told how the judge was mean and didn’t understand him as well as his mommy did and it wasn’t his fault. Little Norman Bates in the making
15:35 what a burn! The insurance company offer him $2,400 for a couple of scratches and he said NO! Greed is a hell of a drug! I hope the defendant contacts his insurance company and tells them the outcome of the case so they won't pay out to this entitled scammer!
The insurance never offered $2400, that’s what the claims adjuster assessed the damage at. The insurance company compromised and offered $700 and then $1000. Try and listen next time.
Once I heard he signed a waiver there’s no way outta that one 😂😂 dude probably did it himself
The weird part is, signing a waiver and noticing damages after does happen, the driver’s insurance even offered him $2400 and instead of taking it because he should have known he had a weaker case for signing a document and giving a tip, he decided to say no and come here…. Hmmmm he may be smart, but clearly not stream smart.
@@LeeoGoneWild The insurance company offered him $700 and then $1,000, never the $2,400. You could make the case he didn't notice the damage at the time of delivery, except he literally claims he witnessed it being damaged haha.
Yeah that was the end of this case
The waiver did him in. He shouldn't have signed it if the guy caused damage to the car when he unloaded it.
😂 Even the defendant was surprised !
“Oh wow”!
Right!! 😂😂😂😂
He wasn’t surprised-he was awestruck about JM abruptly ends the case in an unsympathetic whack of the gavel.
I think he thought she would rule he could still get the insurance but the way she ruled he can't get the insurance.
Cause I think he thinks he is getting the $5,000.00 as well?
@@AnneOhn123
No he knew he wasn't getting that. He was half way joking about that.
Mamas boy right there. I’m pretty sure it was the mother who convinced him to file a lawsuit against the trucker
Doubtful, she would have been talking or trying to. Even she knew this was pointless and you can clearly see it on her face. Also, just because a male brings their mother to court does not mean they are a momma's boy. She was co-owner of the car something you clearly missed.
I'm surprised dad's not there.
@@jessicapearson9479 I’ve participated as a juror a couples of times since I was in high school til mid college and trust me, there’s a lot of cases where parents encourages, uses, and convinces their kid(s) to sue someone.
Sometimes the silent ones are the ones you have to watch out for.
I picked up on the vibes, too!
Oops, should have settled with insurance for the $2400!
Exactly
Idiot🙄🙄🙄🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️. When I read the title i wondered if it was because the guy was going 88 mph 😏😏😏
People get so greedy and indignant, and it screws them every time. She's super fair. I love it when she actually adds punitive sometimes on the really bad ones.
Are you kidding? $2400 wouldn't even pay for a new flux capacitor
The thing is he could've took the settlement and sued the defendant for the difference possibly or at least a Better case than what he just put up
After he said I was emotional or whatever for the third time. Died laughing when the judge says so we don’t need to hold you to the standards of an adult LMFAO 😂
I'm going to go out on a limb and say that the Plaintiff "respectfully disagrees" with the judges verdict.
Should've taken the insurance company's offer and walked away
👍🏾
You can tell the Plaintiff has been spoiled all his life by his parents lol.
i think the same , but it’s okay
Wrong. Just because a 30 year old is given an expensive car for being a good boy, by his mommy and daddy doesn’t mean their spoiled. Oh wait….
@@trust1952 and for doing good in school
I would be upset if my pristine show car got scratched. No matter who my parents were or how I was raised.
U look younger than her! She look old for a girlfriend because he young
“Tryna get 5 racks” 🤣🤣🤣🤣 It may have been overreaching but at least my man was honest !
The thing is no one really knows when it got damaged because he signed that document. I think the plaintiff saw the damage AFTER he got it home, so he assumed it was the truck, but there's a chance it can be something else. The defendant can freely think the same because the guy is telling him after he already left.
That’s what I think but he should have even known he didn’t have a chance with that waver. I can see from both sides of view but was ruled fairly.
Honestly I think (as another commenter put it) he took it for a ride once it was home, damaged it and decided to sue the defendant to cover the damages and made up this story that he saw it get damaged by the truck
The defendant did all he could do legally to release the car and acknowledge damage for insurance compensation. The plaintiff refused $2500. Dumb after dumb.
Maybe he can use his DeLeoreon to go back in time and get a do over 😏😏😏
LMAO!!!
😂😂😂😂
Best. Comment. Ever. Well done!!
lol....slick 🤣😁
🤣🤣🤣
She did Not think that was his girlfriend lol ain’t no way
I came looking for this comment 😂
@@ctilly5859 Me too😄 but I think she meant to say "grandmother".
Exactly
His uncomfortable laugh 😆
Let Judge Milian give the woman a compliment before she rules in favor of the defendant.
Anyone who owns a DeLorean and anyone who can afford a $20,000 restoration, and certainly anyone who can afford both....I think they're gonna be okay.
He didn’t purchase the DeLorean, as he explained, it was gifted to him, partially, by his father. His mother co-owns the car, as well. He possibly used $20K of inheritance money for the restoration. But he signed a waiver and that is a binding contract.
Come on dude, I thought you did “good” in school…lol 🤣
LMBO!!! You stupid! Too funny!
😂😂
😂😂😂😂😂😂
JM correction "well". Not even.
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
As soon as the announcer said he signed a damage agreement he lost! And then he tipped him!
The defendant filed a counter just because he was sued 😆. The plaintiff is pulling strings. He has no idea what happened. If the undercarriage is fiberglass like he says then just driving would scratch it. There are so many rocks and things on the roads. He just does not have the money to fix it.
💯 #facts
Yep 😂
it could have happened but it’s on the owner to thoroughly look at the car- the undercarriage sir - pick n choose your battles- it’s 6 inches it’s bound to get damaged
Funny thing is the car wasn’t 6 inches tho he showed in the picture he was basing that off the highest point. It was 5 like the driver said.
How does it make sense to sue when the insurance company offered a settlement? That was such a dumb gamble and shows what happens when people think based upon emotion.
Not the defendant admitting he was trying to get his 5 racks 😂😂😂😂
He’s acting like a teenager…
*if you are reading this i wish nothing but wealth and health all 2021*
Same to you. Have a good day.
@@jessicapearson9479 thank you so much.
I bet he feels real stupid after passing up that $2500
The insurance never offered $2400, that’s what the claims adjuster assessed the damage at. The insurance company compromised and offered $700 and then $1000. Try and listen next time.
Front clearance on an 1981 Delorean is 5.6 inches
He made a complete fool of himself on national television..
the plaintiff really thought he could fool Judge Milian… NO ONE fools the queen 😂❤️
I would love to have her talent , she can see something right away and call it out without hesitation.
He was/IS a FOOL!!!!!
@Kyla Justice Say it louder for those in the back.
Already rooting for the defendant :)
“Trying to get 5 racks!” A real one right there 🤣🤣🤣🤣
"Heyyy we're in Florida!"
🤣🤣🤣
The defendant seems like a nice guy
I think the plaintiff is a hustler.
I read this in judge Judy's voice 🤣🤣🤣
@@fancyndzefu7798 🤣
The second they said he signed a waiver you knew this case was over.
My man said TRYNA GET THEM 5 racks lmaoooo
It was surprising that the plaintiff looked so shocked. He signed a release form stating there was no damage. He even tipped the guy.
Definition of a Mammas boy right there.
I get a sense that this young gentleman isn’t used to hearing no.
That plaintiff was such a liar, I wonder how much of his story was even true? It definitely couldn't have been "Mint Condition" with that huge list of previously existing damage on the waiver. I have doubts as to his whole story about earning the car from his dad with good grades.
And come on! It's INCREDIBLY obvious that he just didn't notice it happen or was too scared to bring it up until waiting a day.
10:32 I to would be very emotional receiving a car that my parents owned. He's a huge loser and I'm shocked that his mother let him proceed with this nonsense, or maybe that's how she raised him?
What a baby! Also a very satisfying verdict. 😂
Lol even the defendant thought at least get what the insurance offered. He's like wow. He can't even get the insurance now, the way she ruled.
Lmfao the way OG said wow at the end 🤣😂😅🤣 priceless 👌🏻💯
🤣🤣🤣💯💯💯
Been watching the show for many years. I used to have a disposable camera in my glove box before smart phones became a thing because of this show.
Defendant is cool af 💥💥👍👍
When I first read the title I wondered if it was because the guy was going 88 mph 😏😏😏
For some reason he gives me Fat Joe vibes.
“West side” 😂😂
@@Nurse_Nash 😂
What I truly believe is that after the truck driver left and the plaintiff was checking out his car all excited about everything, is when he noticed the damage. I don't doubt the plaintiff was watching the truck driver take his car off the truck and probably came to the conclusion the damage happened when it was being driven off of the truck.
No.
@Hercules Destroys i love your arguments!
But his lie got him.
The Judge didn't seem to realize that it was the car from Back to the Future until the guy pointed that out!!!🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤣🤣🤣
Yeah I have a really hard time thinking she didn't already know that.. I think she "forgot" for effect 😏
Prob 9 out of 10 people didn't even know the joke of you built a time machine out of a delorian when the movie came out.. also even now most people don't specifically think the name of the car just it's just the full wing doors and look of the car not the make and model..
Unfortunately I get where the plaintiff is coming, I’ve actually had multiple customers sign the delivery receipt for a shipment confirming no damages, EVEN THOUGH there were damages. They sign it and then they’d email me stating it was damaged and what to do and I would have to reach out to the carrier and they’re like, “ummm they signed this document stating no damages.” I don’t know exactly why…. But people ABSOLUTELY sign that form even though there are damages upon delivery.
I actually got invited to be on The People’s Court for a similar situation. The guys who delivered my washer damaged a wall in my condo during the delivery. My boyfriend signed the waiver saying everything was okay with the washer. Then the appliance company refused to pay for the wall, claiming that they had a waiver. Unfortunately for them, the waiver was for the appliance, but the delivery drivers damaged a wall. We filed a lawsuit against the appliance company. That’s when The People’s Court reached out to us. We turned them down and settled out of court with the appliance company. But I always wonder what would’ve happened if we went on the show.
@@mikesteele05 Ex boyfriend, I hope? Lol jk jk…. Oh wow, that’s crazy and I’m glad the contract stated damages to the appliance and not to the home, which was perfect for your case. That would have been interesting on People’s Court, I wonder if she would have caught that and told him to pay or sided in his favor, hm. My dad was also asked to be on People’s court do to a rental issue and he declined it too haha.
Cause the cars here I want my car no more issue sign but you can’t sign then say there’s damage that’s the whole point of the form if there’s damage don’t sign oh but they want the car so they sign
I once had a xbox repaired under warranty and sent back to me and it was suppose to be sign stating no damage and the security tape was still sealed. The driver drop it off in such a hurry knocked a planter of the porch and took off. Package was damaged and resealed. I called fed-ex and they stated it didn't need to be signed for. plug it in and it started to smoke so i called microsoft up and told them what happen and they said yes it was supposed to sign for and they will take care of it. They paid for me to send it back next day and i received another one a week later.
My aunt did that 🤦🏽♀️ and I told her why wouldn’t you refuse delivery. People are dumb.
Yikes. I hate when things starts sweet and smooth and the judge likes you and then things change pretty quickly. lmao.
This was the comment I was looking for
When Judge Milian said "son" that was it! I knew it was over for Mr. Privileged PrepBoy 🙄
Judge didn't think she was his girlfriend. Stop playing.
The announcer is shady. I love it. And Douglas is so handsome.
That's my favorite defendant on this show
You signed saying it was all good ‼️
She used the same reference of what she does when picking up her car from the valet in another video I watched today! I love her.
All the plaintiff needs is a flux capacitor to go back in time and get another company to move the car . Then there is no issue.
Let me guess, you're a fan of the Back to the Future movie franchise?
@@rosej5029 no I just watched it with my grandson last weekend.
Or go back and not sign the form
Plaintiff signed the waiver, allowed defendant to take pictures with the car and gave him a tip after witnessing the defendant damage his car !?!!🤔 🤯 Yeah right 😂😂😂
Three things…
1. The Plaintiff signed a waiver of no damage and obviously wasn’t too upset to not take pics of the Defendant in the DeLorean and have him a tip.
2. The Plaintiff was offered $2500 to settle from an insurance company…which is incredible.
3. The Plaintiff was an idiot for not taking the offer from the insurance company and walking away.
The insurance never offered $2400, that’s what the claims adjuster assessed the damage at. The insurance company compromised and offered $700 and then $1000. Try and listen next time.
@@pizzelle2 did you freakin' copy and paste that response?! You've said that exact same thing like 3 times to 3 different people. Get a damn grip!
@@JloveLamar why are you reading every single comment under a video from months ago and comparing them, that’s so pathetic 😂
That is one VERY tall man....................
Pretty sad seeing their full grown adults bringing their mommys and daddys to court with them to hold their hands.....
Nah this is more of an unmarried thing. Everyone likes support & when there’s no spouse, family is family
I went to court w my dad 2 weeks ago bc I don’t like driving uptown & I’m 37 lol
She’s also the co owner of the vehicle
@@missandei151 Thats different though, its one thing if they come with you but to stand right next to you and hold your hand(I know not literally) but you can stand by yourself like a grown up.....but having other with your for moral support is different
@@simpleexpressions13 So if a friend stood next to you it's okay, but not if it's family? Or is it the standing next to someone?
I'm 41 years old, mother of two grown sons, but If I were in court (and on tv!) I would be very nervous and would very much like some support by my side. You act like I would have to revert back to my teenager years telling my mother "nooo mooooom, it would be embarrassing if my mother stood next to me", come on now.
I’m so glad she didn’t wanna see that nonsense medical report 😂😂😂 So silly
The plaintiff shot him self in the Foot and in the Hand when he signed that waiver. And the look on his face when the defendant showed proof that he signed a waiver. 🤦♂️
I actually got invited to be on The People’s Court for a similar situation. The guys who delivered my washer damaged a wall in my condo during the delivery. My boyfriend signed the waiver saying everything was okay with the washer. Then the appliance company refused to pay for the wall, claiming that they had a waiver. Unfortunately for them, the waiver was for the appliance, but the delivery drivers damaged a wall. We filed a lawsuit against the appliance company. That’s when The People’s Court reached out to us. We turned them down and settled out of court with the appliance company. But I always wonder what would’ve happened if we went on the show.
Atleast you were able to settle it. Though to be honest, I would enjoy watching it if it were aired 😂
So happy the defendant won .. nice guy
plaintiff has A LOT! of talk, just not believing him, defendant seems like a VERY! responsible business owner; thinking that under carriage damage was already there.
@Ellie5621 "He used a term I don't know and that scares me so he's a slimey man". Yea, that doesn't sound close-minded at all.
He was the defendant. And he has the right to counter sue for what he feels is excessive aggravation.
Clearly you didn't bother to listen to the judge. She clearly stated that he was just suing because he was sued. She knew what was going on. She gave him the money because the plaintiff was lying and trying to scam her court. Try to pay better attention before making assumptions. Why do you think he said WOW when she gave him the judgement? He honestly thought she would throw his counter claim out. He was surprised she didn't.
@@jessicapearson9479 You need to rewatch the end. The judge ruled in the defendant’s favor regarding the complaint but did not award him the counterclaim. We all make mistakes Sweetie. 😏
@@aarbear4067, I was going to reply, but decided not, Thanks! her (beginning) comment was condescending when it wasn't necessary.
This exact same thing happened to me at a body shop. Shop painted my car and after Inspection outside, noticed imperfections. Told shop and they supposedly would repaint. After week went back and they would not take car out of booth for inspection. Noticed same imperfections and asked to take outside to see in sun and they refused. They state to sign approval right there otherwise they will sell car in auction to force me to sign waiver.
Sued and only won partial. Sometimes you just can't trust people.
I love Judge Milan's you're full of it" glare.
5:31
This is the EPITOME of priviledge that back fired.
I have a saying that I came up with whenever my parents were each in the hospital , and that was “nice doesn’t get the job done “. Meaning that no matter how nice a person is it doesn’t mean they are doing their job correctly.
The judge called the plaintiff "Son" how rude. If anyone calls her ma'am or miss, she has a convulsion. The plaintiff refused a $2400 settlement. What a Fool.
The insurance never offered $2400, that’s what the claims adjuster assessed the damage at. The insurance company compromised and offered $700 and then $1000. Try and listen next time.
I can’t believe the defendant is chewing gum! Judge Judy would have sorted him out in a minute!
T
I noticed that too. I'm glad JM let it go. I can't stand how acerbic Judge Judy is. She drives me nuts with all the banshee shrieking.
@@Daniel-Goodfeather 😂😂😂😂
Skeletor is so savage to the parties when they come out in the hallway 😂
“Tryna get 5 racks”😂🤣🤣 🤙 “west side”!!
The transporter damaged the DeLorean when he PICKED IT UP in NY, BEFORE he drove it to FL. That's why it took him 45 minutes to take it OFF the transporter. truck. The plaintiff did NOT examine the undercarriage when the car was delivered. The transporter noted the other existing exterior scratches upon inspection BEFORE he hooked the car up onto the truck. He DID NOT SEE the damage occurring to the undercarriage as he pulled the car up because he was INSIDE the truck. He may have heard the scraping as it happened but he did NOT note undercarriage damage as it was NOT preexisting. He caused it, while pulling the car up onto the truck, and he would be foolish to indict himself if it was likely the plaintiff would NOT examine underneath when he received the car. If the transporter picked the car up with no problem, it would NOT have taken him 45 minutes to deliver the car without it scraping the undercarriage a second time.
***The transporter needed special LONGER RAMPS to keep such a low car from bottoming out when it was towed onto or off the truck. Few cars require such ramps and that's why he didn't have them handy when he picked up the car.***
Where’s your proof
@@twilliams842 It's called COMMON SENSE and a knowledge of geometry, transporting vehicles, and human behavior. LONGER RAMPS are needed for safe loading and unloading low-slung sports-cars. Nose up to load or unload? Back end hits and drags on the ground unless the angle is decreased by using an extended ramp to keep the back end off the ground. Simple solution but often ignored.
Bet he wishes he had accepted the insurance deal now.
He said respectfully I disagree 😂😂.. Idk why that tickled me so
Not the defendant being shocked at the verdict 🥴🥴🥴😭
I think he thought she would at least rule for the guy to get the insurance to pay, but she made a final decision that he didn't do it.
The plaintiff was lying I think he just was upset because of the money he had to pay
I really dislike how she be yelling and taking over the litigants! Let the man explain his case from his pov. She asks him a question and then keeps talking and yelling, never giving him a chance to explain. This is crazy 😧. I wouldn't want her as a judge
"WEST SIDE"....... I LOVE IT!
Replace "DeLorean" with "POS", and it makes this episode way better.
I’m pretty sure those scratches were probably already there from when his dad owned it 6 inches off the ground is very low it’s practically a low rider and any bump or entry way to a parking lot would easily rub on the bottom of the car. Plus if he thought the transporter scratched it on delivery he shouldn’t have signed the damage release form saying it was all good. This guys trying to get his car fixed after the fact if it was damaged he shouldn’t have singed the form. I don’t think the transporter did anything he even written down what he saw before he delivered it so that even points to all this being there when his dad owned it.
"Wow!" - defendant 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Right..awful ..seeing people always taking pictures of their meals..
Dude went all Michael J Fox on that car as soon as he got it and f@cked it up, now he's blaming the other dude
Maybe it was from the missile fired by the terrorist in the parking lot ... gotta get back in time
Yes, you need to take pictures before loading the car and after.
Those scraps are in different directions, look old and I those were there from prior parking near sidewalks/curbs.
He is from the west side of where exactly?
He was not very forthcoming.
I love driving nice cars. I find great joy in owning and cruising in sport or luxury automobiles. I would never be able to relax in a car so low to the ground. It would never be a fun drive.
Hopefully the plaintiff at least learned a lesson from this about waivers. No matter how much you “respectfully disagree” it’s still signed and agreed to.
Don’t sign the waiver or at least write on it at the time what the damage is prior to signing.
Once that waiver is signed with no note of damages the person who delivered is off the hook.
People take material crap way too seriously. And collector's items are ridiculous. Keep it in a storage or something if you want to prevent any damage. This will inevitably happen.
maybe he should go back to the future and redo it. a car that sat for years and a collectors item needs 20 thousand in restoration. and you're worried about scratches underneath
I can't believe those plaintiffs were trying to scam that company
He should get loss wages and something for the aggravation. He's right, if people see him as someone who damages cars during transport they won't do business with him
The judge Did It Again..!
Paperwork Does Justice For The Facts Of An Incident..!
8:16 Makes absolutely no sense! The entire undercarriage of the vehicle is messed up... "Sign this waiver of damage? There's no place to note the undercarriage damage...but everything else is good." *signs waiver of damage*
Even 6 inches is very low, going over a slight hump in the road will do a lot of damage, having to put down extra tracks to get the car off the transporter sounds dodgy enough, what about when the car was put ON the transporter, did they use wider tracks? Goes to prove that people sign documents without reading them, mind you the Insurance Companies make them long-winded and several pages long with extra small print to put you off.
I LOVE the defendant. He's a hoot!
Ugh when she said “ugh 6 is tew low” keep your heads up KINGs
"West side?" 🤦🏼♀️ Total cringe! 🙄
Oh shush christy
@@kacylant8656 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
😂😂😂