Rolex Sea-Dweller Watch Review | 50th Anniversary (126600)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 22 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 36

  • @emmanuelrodriguez5044
    @emmanuelrodriguez5044 ปีที่แล้ว +41

    The sub it’s an icon but once you see an SD43 then the sub looks boring

    • @JBlakeS23
      @JBlakeS23 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I can’t believe the sub is priced anywhere near $8k after trying on and buying the SD43.

    • @bmwe36m3evo
      @bmwe36m3evo 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Absolutely true!

    • @OhioVworld
      @OhioVworld 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Sub looks small and toyish on even a large man’s wrist. I’m a legit XXL guy and a a sub looks comically delicate and small on my wrist/forearms. I was a 400lbs bencher as a college student all natural and am6ft even for reference.

    • @edx21x
      @edx21x 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@OhioVworldhow’s the thickness? I have bigger than average wrists, not huge. I tried one on and the diameter was perfect. I just worry about it being too thick to be comfortable for an extended time. My AD offered me one yesterday and I’m still thinking about it.

    • @OhioVworld
      @OhioVworld 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@edx21x Honestly, I wear long sleeve dress shirts ~10 X a yr, if that, so I might not be that attuned to that, but it looked just right on my wrist. The deep sea is much thicker eye balling it.

  • @caseyzaft6734
    @caseyzaft6734 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Is that cyclops lens glued onto the crystal?

  • @kurtklimisch7498
    @kurtklimisch7498 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Great video. I was especially concerned about the depth/height of the caseback. I have seen in Rolexforums that some people complain that the extended caseback hurts their wrists. You had some good shots of how it sits on the wrist. You can see that the caseback is high. I have to imagine that if you wear it as a daily you would get used to it. Did anyone notice this?

    • @distincttimepieces
      @distincttimepieces  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It’s a comfortable watch from my experience. Glad the video helped, thanks for sharing your thoughts 👍

    • @eduardovillalon7496
      @eduardovillalon7496 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You are completely right: I bought this watch and sold it after a month of ownership. The reason is precisely what you described: The back case is ridiculously high and it doesn’t let the watch to sit properly on the wrist, and it’s very uncomfortable and feels top heavy. I sold it and got a Sub Ceramic 41mm, and the difference it’s night and day. Even the (bigger) DeepSea James Cameron sits much flatter on the wrist and it’s more comfortable to wear is you have the wrist to pull it.

    • @Betheball1966
      @Betheball1966 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Totally disagree. Sits great and it means the case sides are thin. And so the watch appears thinner than it actually is.

  • @LogicalNimbus
    @LogicalNimbus ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very well done. Now I need to see it on my wrist!

  • @masonn85
    @masonn85 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Perfection unnoticed!

  • @Romio666
    @Romio666 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Is there any difference between the bracelet size of Mk1 vs Mk2 ?

    • @cardaun
      @cardaun 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No. No difference in bracelet. There is even no diff at all next to the missing little crown on the 6 on the MK1. We have layed both together MK1 / MK2 an the diff of a slight less glossy dial we could not see any difference. And as soon as you start using a cyclops to find diffs it starts gettin overdone.

  • @watchwolf2024
    @watchwolf2024 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The best Rolex to buy.

  • @cardaun
    @cardaun 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Good review. In general, wasn‘t it THE SD we have all been waiting for? Never wanted a SD without cyclops bc. it reminded me as a Subby without date. . It has red letters, and its a bit bigger and still nice to wear if U have no tiny wrist. In this times no one can tell if they go up or down , but if Rolex takes the watch out of the catalogue , I am pretty sure they get highly desirable

  • @jaysongauthier5152
    @jaysongauthier5152 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Just got mine. Incredible but they all don’t have the wet suit extension. You said mine was taken out, well mine didn’t come with one. Yes from a AD.

  • @doraepeet
    @doraepeet ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It’s my first Rolex. I’ve got it from AD with luck because I have no purchase history with them before

  • @djdc81
    @djdc81 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I have this exact watch. It's my favourite watch. I also live in LDN and you're braver than me to wear it out and about! 😅

  • @bloodymarvelous4790
    @bloodymarvelous4790 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Tritium isn't dangerous. Radium is. Tritium lume loses it's luminescence over time, that's why it was replace with Luminova.
    Also, I hate that video clip of divers touching coral. Do not touch sea life. It's there to be observed, not touched.

  • @djvelenderic
    @djvelenderic ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Beautiful watch ! But for me the Datejust edges this one out

    • @mendipfox1650
      @mendipfox1650 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Datejust. Really. I absolutely hate the datejust. I’d rather have an OP or explorer I all day long.

    • @djvelenderic
      @djvelenderic ปีที่แล้ว

      @@mendipfox1650 Yes really

    • @distincttimepieces
      @distincttimepieces  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Datejust and Sea-Dweller are so different would be a hard choice choosing only one to keep!

    • @planetocean
      @planetocean 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      completely different watches. strange comparison. datejust v sky dweller maybe

  • @조영국-n1h
    @조영국-n1h ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Not a 50th anniversary SD 43 -mk1, but just a Sea-Dweller SD 43 - mk2.

    • @distincttimepieces
      @distincttimepieces  ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Same but different, depending who you ask

    • @Romio666
      @Romio666 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I would swap my Mk2 for a Mk1, but is the bracelet exactly the same ?

    • @davidofglenbrook4487
      @davidofglenbrook4487 5 วันที่ผ่านมา

      I am so happy I passed on the Mk1 and waited for the upgraded Mk2 model. The improvements are worth the wait.