Crucial MX500 SSD vs Crucial BX500 SSD

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 171

  • @gboyspeed
    @gboyspeed 4 ปีที่แล้ว +261

    Better music than annoying random beat music

  • @marianb.5960
    @marianb.5960 4 ปีที่แล้ว +81

    The answer is that MX has more expensive (and better) 3D-NAND memory and better controller, so it has 60 month of varranty (BX has 36 month), so if you are looking only for speed, buy bx (it is not significantly slower, as you see in tests). If you are looking for trustiness and you don't want to realise that your SSD died one day with your data - buy MX500, because it has bigger resource.
    As a bonus I advice you to check up a price for samsung 860 EVO in your country. If it is not much more expensive than mx500 (or same price), buy it. EVO also has 5 years of varranty but real tests show that it's TBW (TB written) is smth about 2500TB. Ask yourself, would you be able to rewrite 2 500 000 GB on your SSD in even 10 years? Ofc no

    • @1_adityasingh
      @1_adityasingh 4 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      The 2400TB TBW is for the 4TB model (or whatever is the highest capacity). For the 500GB model, it's 300TB (vs MX500's 180TB). Both are ridiculously high. The performance is *exactly* the same. Buy whichever one is cheaper. The only plus point with Samsung is that it's cloning software is *the best* in the business.

    • @bilalhassankhan221
      @bilalhassankhan221 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      You will install only softwares and windows in SSD bro not the data you should save your data in HDD so, if SSD failed then, your DATA is save because you have already saved your data in HDD not in SSD only your windows will corrupt !

    • @kirisuma2186
      @kirisuma2186 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@bilalhassankhan221 "Save"... funny, considering that the only thing that ever broke for me is the hdd... three times in the past 10 years. I will never ever put a HDD in my system again, as the third time a HDD broke randomly for me is only 8 hours ago...

    • @CounterReact
      @CounterReact 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks ☺️

    • @Jason_Voorhees.
      @Jason_Voorhees. ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I'm only using my bx500 1tb to store game downloads, nothing important so if it dies I'll replace and download my games again lol

  • @juansarmiento154
    @juansarmiento154 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Thanks to this video I learned about DRAM-less SSDs, thank you very much.

    • @Kiyo63
      @Kiyo63 ปีที่แล้ว

      Can u explain for me sorry not that computer guy

  • @saviogoncalves
    @saviogoncalves 3 ปีที่แล้ว +38

    Great video! In fact, the capacity of the extra cache memory is 1/1000 of capacity of the SSD. So the cache in MX-500 250Gb is 256Mb, in MX-500 500Gb is 512Mb, in MX-500 1Tb is 1Gb and so on ...

    • @Coldheart9009
      @Coldheart9009 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      This is what I came to ask in the comments :) I have a 1TB MX500 so it has a 1GB DRAM cache; I paid the bit extra money over the BX500 for this feature.

    • @divinecreations5065
      @divinecreations5065 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Coldheart9009 can you please explain what Dram does and what exact changes one will experience if buy MX instead of BX.
      Thank you

    • @Coldheart9009
      @Coldheart9009 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      @@divinecreations5065 As far as I know, SSDs with a DRAM cache (in this case, with the MX500 there is a 500MB cache for 500GB, 1GB for 1TB etc) which aids with performance and overall longevity of the SSD. So instead of writing to the SSD each time, data is written to the DRAM cache and then flushed to the main storage when the workload is low and the SSD isn't doing much. The BX500 has no DRAM and so while listing similar speeds will not perform or have the lifespan as the MX500 with DRAM - hence why the BX500 is cheaper.
      Someone please correct me if I'm wrong, but this is my understanding. The extra money for an SSD with DRAM versus one without, is worth it in terms of overall performance and lifespan of the drive.

  • @cliffeck6104
    @cliffeck6104 3 ปีที่แล้ว +36

    I have used the MX500 in both a Dell Inspiron Laptop and an HP -? 15" i3 Laptop and both increased in speed dramatically. Perhaps 10 times faster. The SSD is worth every penny.

  • @dmitriigladkikh5142
    @dmitriigladkikh5142 5 ปีที่แล้ว +53

    My friend, you did not say anything about the temperature in the load. This is also important!

  • @poornimab9205
    @poornimab9205 4 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    THIS IS THE VIDEO WHICH I WAS SERCHING FOR ,THANKS BRO ,AND NICE REVIEW

  • @cdr999
    @cdr999 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Carajo Dassalok Eres un Dios!! No sabía de esta función, pensaba que funcionaba automáticamente eso del caché.mil gracias!!

  • @AintPopular
    @AintPopular 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Well explained lots of manufacturer skip these

  • @julianpopov9262
    @julianpopov9262 4 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Wow nice editing super underrated

  • @muhammadzafranbinnaharrudi591
    @muhammadzafranbinnaharrudi591 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Thank you. I was torn between the two for my 2011 PC 🤣👍

    • @racineurr.8924
      @racineurr.8924 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hello. 11 months after your post, I'm in the same situation you were. I want to upgrade a 2012 Acer 7560G with 740g HHD. I hesitate between these 2 models of SSD. So which one did you chose? My laptop is only used for reading news and YouTubing at breakfast and lunchtime. No work, no gaming. Thanks for sharing.

  • @richardalefgarros3242
    @richardalefgarros3242 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I loved the piano song. Thank you!

  • @fordummieslikeme7575
    @fordummieslikeme7575 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    The crucial website does a terrible job explaining the difference between these two lines of SSD if you just look at the pictures it looks like the BX is for laptops but this video shows them side-by-side looks like either one could go on a laptop I have the older M500 240GB from six years ago in my desktop I built has worked great I just want to upgrade it to the 1TB size So I'm getting the MX 500 but was just curious what the BX was looks like it's really not that much of a difference And could go into a desktop.. I'm sure many would say any laptop 2.5 inch SSD could go into a desktop with the right adapter my case came with the proper 2.5 inch side adapters so I am fine.. Going to stick with the MX.. Seems like a bunch of unnecessary confusion and complication for very limited difference and very badly explained on the crucial site but oh well nothings perfect on the Internet

    • @trueheart5666
      @trueheart5666 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      ForDummiesLikeMe MX has dram and BX does not. That's the most important part here. On Amazon Canada, a 240gb bx is $61.36 and the mx version of that is $69.99. Basically you get dram which is a faster ssd with $10 additional cost.

    • @fredsmith5473
      @fredsmith5473 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@trueheart5666 Yes, also the MX500 has higher endurance and a five year warranty rather than three. The MX500 is a bit more expensive, but it also has slightly higher capacity 250GB vs 240GB. I'd say for the extra cost, the MX500 is the better buy.

    • @1_adityasingh
      @1_adityasingh 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@fredsmith5473 Yes, the MX500 is way better than the BX500. The only use case for the BX500 is a very old computer connected to a printer 😂

    • @fredsmith5473
      @fredsmith5473 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@1_adityasingh Looking at my on line supplier's 500GB SATA SSDs; MX500 £55, BX500 £52, the cheapest, (Integral/PNY/Patriot) about £40. If I wanted an SSD for an old laptop or spare PC (which probably has SATA II) or Raspberry Pi etc, and I really wanted to save money, I'd go for a £40 one. At these prices I can't see that the BX500 is in any way an attractive option.

  • @vBDKv
    @vBDKv 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Just go with the MX.

    • @sri198507
      @sri198507 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      reason?

    • @vBDKv
      @vBDKv 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@sri198507 It's better.

    • @sri198507
      @sri198507 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@vBDKv but i hv read somewhere on Google tht MX has old technology n bx has got newer

    • @vBDKv
      @vBDKv 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @alak58 The MX is 1 dollar more expensive. Look online for reviews, it is far superior.

    • @agrisimfarming
      @agrisimfarming 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @alak58 You really shouldnt get the bx500 even if it is cheaper as it doesnt have dram and can cause it to wear a lot more and not last as long. It may seem like the mx isnt worth it until your steam library is gone because the ssd failed. Here is a video explaining why: th-cam.com/video/ybIXsrLCgdM/w-d-xo.html

  • @rodrigofilho1996
    @rodrigofilho1996 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    U cant test the speed of an SSD with data on it, the performance degrades the more filled up the drives gets.

  • @akshitrajput5413
    @akshitrajput5413 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Bro bx500 ki life hdd se toh jyada hi hogi na or fast bhi 😢😢 ?

  • @ShivamKumar-ee8vs
    @ShivamKumar-ee8vs ปีที่แล้ว

    Perfect video, no begging of likes and subscribe. Just point to point. 🔥

  • @Tapered3414
    @Tapered3414 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Hi, thank you for sharing your review. I downloaded the Storage Executive, then to installed, but isn't opening any suggestions, I will appreciate.

  • @RonLarhz
    @RonLarhz 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    What is this momentum cache thing? Will it ruin the ssd health faster?

    • @thekeypuncher
      @thekeypuncher ปีที่แล้ว

      Did you find out anything? I was planning to buy a bx500 1tb.

  • @mmadeleine5768
    @mmadeleine5768 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I have PS4 Slim and i'd like to change my storage drive HDD to SSD. If any of these will be a good option, but in version 2TB? I will be gratfull for Your advice.

    • @stonespider
      @stonespider 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      My advice is to stop Playing games and look for a job.

    • @TheChaoticWolf
      @TheChaoticWolf ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@stonespider You literally have gameplay videos on your channel, but ok

    • @itscarlosg233
      @itscarlosg233 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ⁠fr

    • @mmadeleine5768
      @mmadeleine5768 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​​@@stonespider😂
      Why people think that you don't have a job, when you like play video games on free time sometimes 😂

  • @RichardClark-pd6mg
    @RichardClark-pd6mg 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Does anyone know if either one of these drives have the privacy encryption feature?

  • @dheerajpareek10
    @dheerajpareek10 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    so if i wanna buy one out of these which is better for a Raspberry Pi 4 ? what i thought at initial point that a BX500 120gb would be fine but does Dram will affect the performance or will it really die sooner even if i use it just for RaspBerry Pi 4 ( Only For OS ).

    • @ExeterXD
      @ExeterXD 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Mx500 is just slightly more expensive, dram does affect performance especially with os on it

  • @neth77
    @neth77 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Just bought the MX500 1TB.
    I am trying to stay away from anything Samsung ever again after my Samsung Air con, Microwave and TV died.

    • @rosabeha8121
      @rosabeha8121 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Failures like this must have a common cause. Often there are repeated voltage peaks in the power grid. I recommend surge protection here. These are even available for the socket.

  • @TheOgi22
    @TheOgi22 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    02:50 - this is MX500?
    And what numbers is for BX500 when momentum cache activate?
    Or for BX500 is not possible to activate?

    • @vuli1647
      @vuli1647 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      bx dont have cache, if I am not mistaken.

    • @superpooper_2030
      @superpooper_2030 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      BX500 is DRAMless so it’s just little bit slower. DRAM is better for endurance and when transferring more than 100gb file

    • @gummi4977
      @gummi4977 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@superpooper_2030 is there any side effect when activated that momentum cache? Reached almost 2x of transfer speed was very surprising.

    • @1_adityasingh
      @1_adityasingh 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@gummi4977 AFAIK, there are chances of data loss in case of power failure (as RAM is volatile). So turn it on only if you have a UPS (or a laptop 😉)

  • @angrybunny2088
    @angrybunny2088 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I have a nvme boot drive, however i want to change my storage hdd to ssd as my hdd is failing. So would it be a good idea to buy a dram less bx500 1tb only for storage drive?

    • @swide2750
      @swide2750 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      dont forget raid0-10

    • @EevaaAryan
      @EevaaAryan 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      ??

  • @senko3657
    @senko3657 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Who is the best ?

  • @a.kbgmia.k8302
    @a.kbgmia.k8302 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Not a difference between mx and bx it is almost same speed is same only MX has 1 or 2 features more

    • @GeorgeLeon
      @GeorgeLeon 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      There is a huge difference, depending on your usage. In real world with a heavily loaded 10th Generation Intell i7 & 16Gb of DDR4 RAM in a mid-tier system the MX-500 @ 2TB will sustain 20k-40k IOPS at ~500 MBPS & will it keeps doing it, start to finish. ---On the other hand, the BX500 (also 2Tb) loses 2-years of warranty coverage & while it starts out strong in the 500's MBPS, the IOPS never rises above 6k & the speed tanks over time as does the IO. The BX is fine as a data drive, but for anything critical, it'd not be my first choice.

  • @sultanmalik4530
    @sultanmalik4530 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Did only MX500 supports the feature momentum cache?

    • @ayushsenapati8420
      @ayushsenapati8420 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      yes

    • @vininfar
      @vininfar 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Even BX500 supports, I have one

    • @saviogoncalves
      @saviogoncalves 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@vininfar Impossible. I have one too and not supports Momentum Cache. Only MX-500 supports Momentum Cache. BX-500 is DRAMless.

  • @Canuckle19
    @Canuckle19 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Great video, very helpful, thank you

  • @DO6POIIIEJIATEJIb
    @DO6POIIIEJIATEJIb 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Ага...Только время работы "на отказ", у МХ в 2 раза больше!!!

  • @vikram9966
    @vikram9966 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Which one is best for boot

  • @tushar1139
    @tushar1139 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    what is nand type in mx500 mlc ot tlc ?

  • @kristijanmladjovic3379
    @kristijanmladjovic3379 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    so bassicaly price/performance, bx500 is a lot better

    • @stew880
      @stew880 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @gazza yes but my retail price bx500 is 25usd cheaper

    • @stew880
      @stew880 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @gazza and also activating momentum cache gave a lot of performance boost... Are there any side affects of enabling that?

  • @anirbanroy9558
    @anirbanroy9558 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    How to enable momentum cache of MX500 on macOS Catalina?

  • @almanseinvater4681
    @almanseinvater4681 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I can't recommend the BX500, the writerate Drops down to 6MB/s If you Copy big Files, you should spend some more Money If you want a Overall good SSD

    • @almanseinvater4681
      @almanseinvater4681 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Blackfeet Samsung 860 EVO for example. This ist an Overall good SSD. It depends on your purposes. If you are on Low Budget and need a ssd Just for gaming, Go for the BX500. But If you transfer big Files on a regular basis, this SSD will Hurt you. Yesterday I transfered 200GB from my Samsung to my BX500, the First 20 Seconds, 400MB/s...all good. A few Moments later, the rate drops to 6MB/s. There will be Spikes and drops the whole time. In the end it took way longer than it should be. So my recommendation is to spend 20€ more on a Samsung SSD, you wont be disappointed

    • @angrysocialjusticewarrior
      @angrysocialjusticewarrior 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@almanseinvater4681 Samsung 860 Evo is expensive. The Crucial MX500 (not BX500) is on par with the Samsung Evo and usually at a cheaper price than the Samsung.

    • @almanseinvater4681
      @almanseinvater4681 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@angrysocialjusticewarrior thats true

    • @samogx86
      @samogx86 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@almanseinvater4681 Thank you.

    • @JorgeHernandez-sv7jx
      @JorgeHernandez-sv7jx 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@almanseinvater4681 Write drops from ssd bx500 happens from what transfers in gb? And why does that happen, shouldn't it be stable?

  • @mrj8660
    @mrj8660 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    is momentum cache good for health of SSD

    • @krishnaprasad-dh8mz
      @krishnaprasad-dh8mz 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      It doesn't show any affect on SSD's health.
      Momentum cache uses a part of your PC's ram to boost SSD's speed..

  • @rahul-qm9fi
    @rahul-qm9fi 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice editing bro . U should have more subs.

  • @sultanmalik4530
    @sultanmalik4530 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Which editing software u hv purchased??

  • @ololoshiche
    @ololoshiche 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    это не сравнение... не отображает реальной разницы, а она существенная

  • @gamehex1616
    @gamehex1616 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    make disassembly video of both ssd

  • @tenner9815
    @tenner9815 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I’m confused what one is better if I was to install windows on and what one is more reliable and fast etc ?

    • @seloozil4382
      @seloozil4382 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      The MX500 bcs it has DRAM

    • @captainfatbat9557
      @captainfatbat9557 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      MX500 is better, but not by a very huge margin. On a boot drive its more important to make sure that the drive is never more than 80% filled.

  • @bablusantosh2
    @bablusantosh2 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Is TLC available in MX500

    • @nhs.14
      @nhs.14 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Mx500 is TLC only dude

  • @jsadder77
    @jsadder77 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Vou montar um pc gamer e estava em dúvida entre o BX500, e o MX50,0 dá Crucial você me tirou essa dúvida vou também trocar o Hd do 2°notebook da minha irmã. Vou comprar um MX500 de 500Gb e um BX500 pra minha irmã de 240Gb. Mas, o preço está tão bom que penso em colocar no computador da minha irmã um Bx 500 de 480Gb embora eu sei que ela nunca vai encher o ssd. Você fez a melhor análise sobre o ssd MX500 Crucial. Obrigado.

    • @slimer6023
      @slimer6023 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Go for the 480! The difference in price for the amount of date is very negligible, plus 240gb is low for most people!

  • @leicenful
    @leicenful 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Hi, so what better to buy, mx or bx. The results a better the same.

    • @vikramssjk
      @vikramssjk 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Mx500 is better ssd.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Crucial-MX500-250GB-vs-Crucial-BX500-240GB/3951vsm578496

    • @waynefreeman595
      @waynefreeman595 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@vikramssjk So, I'm just a regular guy who's trying to discern which one is better, by how much, and do I need it. The link you provided "seems" to be saying the MX500 is 60% faster. Is that correct? -- It sure would help if you would say a few words to give a quick sense to viewers of which one is best for certain users, but may not be necessary for others. -- Thanks for the video!

    • @vikramssjk
      @vikramssjk 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@waynefreeman595 if you have new processor like before 4/5 years old then mx 500 lr if you have veey old processor then go for bx 500.

    • @DarkR3ignlol
      @DarkR3ignlol 5 ปีที่แล้ว +88

      @@waynefreeman595 The BX500 stores 4 Bits per Datacell, while the MX500 only stores 3 Bits per Datacell. Also the BX500 does not have any DRAM Cache. What does that mean?
      The BX500 will be slower in Random Writes and Reads wich will be mostly noticable when you intall Windows on this drive. Because it stores more Data per Cell, it will die faster then the MX500. Every SSD can only write that much data per cell before the Cell dies. This should not make a difference unless you write very much Data every Day.
      So what to buy?
      The BX500 will shine as a 2nd Datadrive for maybe your games, or some programs you dont use every day. You dont install 2-3 new games every day for the next 5 years, and it wont really matter if your game loads in 10 or 11 seconds. Therefore you can save some cash and get the BX500. If you want to use it as a Bootdrive and install Windows, you should get the MX500 unless you are on a very tight budget and really cant afford the few extra bucks. Both Drives will be way faster then any HDD

    • @waynefreeman595
      @waynefreeman595 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Thanks guys; very helpful!

  • @abdelkaderabdelkader6288
    @abdelkaderabdelkader6288 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Slc or mlc

  • @subhashischowdhury6171
    @subhashischowdhury6171 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    WTF is momentum cache?

    • @fatihyakar
      @fatihyakar 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      It gives more powerrr

    • @ukasz8589
      @ukasz8589 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Momentum Cache is a feature of Storage Executive that allows you to use some of your DRAM to cache write commands to the Crucial SSD

    • @4CfxthXBhVqTjMHIPIwXjIW6GhKmh0
      @4CfxthXBhVqTjMHIPIwXjIW6GhKmh0 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      It's a very, very dangerous thing, which stores data in random access memory, before writing it down. A powerloss will produce destroyed data on the ssd, if you don't have an usv.

    • @1_adityasingh
      @1_adityasingh 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@4CfxthXBhVqTjMHIPIwXjIW6GhKmh0 exactly. But keep it enables if installed in a laptop.

  • @ernst559
    @ernst559 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Anyone
    2020

  • @monishkumararanganathan2000
    @monishkumararanganathan2000 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    What is enable momentum cache

    • @gamestv4875
      @gamestv4875 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      When you need some momentum to get more cash. Jokes aside.
      Crucial's Momentum Cache software will help to decrease the number of random writes to the drive by buffering the small blocks in DRAM and passing the data to the drive as large block data. This also helps with to decrease the size of the flash transition table map. Crucial's Storage Executive software now allows you to use Momentum Cache on a secondary drive. We will cover that more at the end of the review.

    • @WillVRam
      @WillVRam 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@gamestv4875 can I use the Momentum Cache on Desktop PCs? I have Crucial BX500 and there is a warning here "Using Momentum Cache without a battery backed power source is not recommended and you do so at your own risk."

    • @_Stas_777
      @_Stas_777 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      ​@@WillVRam Its mean that if energy go off all your data (or some recent data) will be destroyed because it was saved on RAM before going to SSD. On Notebooks there no such problem because of battery.

    • @matius_ow
      @matius_ow 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Vol' Jin Zekh'Ram the white one, that is the ssd that has DRAM cache and a logner warranty. I have the other one and is not bad at all but I discovered that without the cache memory the ssd can wear out faster reducing Its lifespam ( reason why It has 3yr warranty instead of 5). Anyways, I can sleep great at night with a reduced lifetime SSD, so if u bought the same as I dont concern.

  • @kubol5036
    @kubol5036 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    is there anyone who has mx500 or bx500 in asus tuf gaming?

  • @rubendulcey2924
    @rubendulcey2924 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    saludos compre un bx500 y arroja 284mb de lectura estara malo o es pirata

    • @sluckash
      @sluckash 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      si te queda muy poco espacio libre puede ser ese el problema... al parecer los ssd cunado no tienen espacio libre (o muy poco), bajan considerablemente sus velocidades

    • @rubendulcey2924
      @rubendulcey2924 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      es nuevo de 480gb solo instale windows 7@@sluckash

    • @ratonlucho
      @ratonlucho 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Usas SATA 3?

    • @brianbv9605
      @brianbv9605 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ratonlucho yo tengo sata 2, se notará diferencia entre un mx500 y un bx500? Un saludo y gracias

    • @ratonlucho
      @ratonlucho 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@brianbv9605 en ese caso el limitante es el puerto, desaprovechas las velocidades de cualquiera. Mx tiene DRam que ayuda a la rapidez y facilidad de acceso a datos. Bx no lo tiene, por eso la garantía y dirabilidad es menor, debido a que trabaja más para lo mismo. (Aunque cualquiera son más rápidos que un HDD). Casi todas las Mainboards hay SATA 3 desde el 2010. Casi siempre es Blanco o en vez de decir Sata 3 dice "6.0 Gb/s".

  • @rafay1067
    @rafay1067 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    What is boot time when momentum cache is enabled?

    • @dassalok7528
      @dassalok7528  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Momentum cache does not affect boot time much but opening large file or software will be faster.

    • @falkensteinfallen1288
      @falkensteinfallen1288 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@dassalok7528 Momentum cache is on MX500 only or is it also on BX500. I buyed a 240GB BX500 and delivered tomorrow and just wanted to know.

    • @dassalok7528
      @dassalok7528  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@falkensteinfallen1288 only on MX500
      BX500 doesn't have this feature

    • @vininfar
      @vininfar 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Dassalok Dude even BX500 has momentum cache. I have it on mine

    • @falkensteinfallen1288
      @falkensteinfallen1288 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@vininfar No there's no momentum cache on mine it's the first thing I have searched 😅

  • @1DeathBlack
    @1DeathBlack 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    You forgot about temperature. BX500 is hot as a bitch!

  • @WillVRam
    @WillVRam 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Beautiful music.
    Name?

    • @ingrooo
      @ingrooo 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      th-cam.com/video/k_mwT84s_is/w-d-xo.html

    • @WillVRam
      @WillVRam 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ingrooo ty

    • @angrysocialjusticewarrior
      @angrysocialjusticewarrior 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      This is where you will find the best version of the song:
      th-cam.com/video/y6120QOlsfU/w-d-xo.html

    • @WillVRam
      @WillVRam 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@angrysocialjusticewarrior old gold

  • @hufflepuff488
    @hufflepuff488 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Is this plastic or metal ssd?

    • @aless5211
      @aless5211 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Plastic

  • @NewShortsCollection5130
    @NewShortsCollection5130 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    can i enable momentum in both ssd

    • @theinhumaneme
      @theinhumaneme 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Momentum uses your Ram
      Not worth it since it feels fast but eats away your RAM during writes..
      Reads are not affected

  • @4CfxthXBhVqTjMHIPIwXjIW6GhKmh0
    @4CfxthXBhVqTjMHIPIwXjIW6GhKmh0 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This comparation is fairly useless, because you are working with the integrated cache. The BX 500 drops down to nothing, if you have a lot of IO's per second oder writing a big file (copy, extracting etc.).

    • @vuli1647
      @vuli1647 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      it is not, now you know the difference between BX and MX series. At least I do, now.

  • @geniusnocopyrightmusic9368
    @geniusnocopyrightmusic9368 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I installed crucial on Lenovo G580 my speed not increased that much.

    • @tsvillain
      @tsvillain 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Have you installed OS on SSD? And try to attach SSD at the place of HDD and HDD in Caddy.

    • @northremembers5455
      @northremembers5455 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@tsvillain adding hdd in caddy is good option or a bad option??

    • @tsvillain
      @tsvillain 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@northremembers5455 I am using SSD in caddy because adding HDD to caddy was creating more wait at the side.

    • @northremembers5455
      @northremembers5455 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@tsvillain bro I am thinking that i should only install ssd and should make hdd external, is it a good idea??

    • @tsvillain
      @tsvillain 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@northremembers5455 yes that sounds good.
      But in this case as you are removing HDD I will suggest you to add SSD in HDD slot only instead of using any caddy.
      Many laptop manufacturers use slow speed sata connection for CD Drivers.

  • @حسنسيد-خ5ذ1غ
    @حسنسيد-خ5ذ1غ 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    omg
    the music is lovely

  • @boppin_bennie
    @boppin_bennie 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Yawn ...

    • @hhectorlector
      @hhectorlector 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      what are you yawning about? seriously - I fell asleep and just woke up

  • @musicsoul95
    @musicsoul95 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Bx500 that a shit

  • @SajidKhan-xf2sw
    @SajidKhan-xf2sw 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice video 👍

  • @arunjagtap7211
    @arunjagtap7211 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Samsung 512mb DDR4 SDRAM

  • @Sweatedsiren895
    @Sweatedsiren895 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    BX500 sucks

  • @arunjagtap7211
    @arunjagtap7211 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    870 Evo