Cheaters are the Scum of the Earth
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 พ.ย. 2024
- For today's episode of Fixed Friday I am getting very close to the end of this series. A number of folks were upset that I didn't get my regular release in on Friday because I was promoting the Risk Legends tournament so here is an additional Fixed Friday episode to make up for it.
I encounter a cheating scumbag in this game and I report General Alpha 12831 and scall54 for collusion. Just a reminder that even if you don't believe in Karma, if you are ever going to cheat at anything in life, the only person you cheat is yourself.
I'm excited to reach GM on this project and I'm glad to still see the progression.
33-26
I share some strategic thoughts for the game of Risk: Global Domination.
Settings are:
Map: Classic
Mode: World Domination
Setup: Auto
Cards: Fixed
AI Difficulty: Expert
Turn Timer: 60s
Fog: Off
Blizzards: Off
Alliances: On
Dice: Balanced Blitz
Players are:
1st: General Tabata 12858 - Iraq - Beginner
2nd: SCUMBAG CHEATER #1
3rd: SCUMBAG CHEATER #2
4th: thejacksback - Australia - Grandmaster
5th: Myself - Top Grandmaster
6th: General Cheese 12679 - USA - Intermediate
If you would like to find me on Twitch check it out here:
/ thekillpetestrategy
If you would like to join the online Risk community, connect with other players and have the chance to play with some of the best in the world, come on down to the discord:
/ discord
And if you are a grandmaster looking to connect with other grandmasters in our own space DM me on the Discord and I'll send you the invite link.
I hope you enjoy!
Pete
#Risk #RiskStrategy #RiskGlobalDomination #Risk4Ever #boardgames
To support me on this path to mastery the link to my Patreon is below:
/ thekillpetestrategy
Donations are never expected and always appreciated. Thank you!
As a colorblind viewer, thank you for using colorblind mode!
You're welcome!
Which color blind setting do you need?
@@Snoborder95 I use Deuteranopia because I have that and Protanopia. Thankfully, the app devs had the foresight to also make each team have different shapes on colorblind mode, so I can make due with either.
@@rmcclure21 I’m colorblind too. Not very strong colorblindness but it’s there i have deurteranopia and it’s nice to see some other colorblind people
1 in 3 chance, there's at least 3 different kinds of color blindness. But this was still wholesome to read.
I don’t get why he’s so angry. Looks to me like they perfectly executed “the kill Pete strategy”
🤣
I had people Collab against me once. It was a fog of war fixed capital game and there was three of us left that were pretty equal in strength as far as I could tell. Then one player suicides into me twice giving the other player a significant advantage. At this point I knew I was for sure going to lose and that the suicide was very weak so I decided fuck it I'll get second. I go to finish off the other player when I come on a capital of the stronger player that has one position behind it. I then remember the suicider said thanks during the stronger players turn and knew for a fact he had a position behind that capital and they were trying to get him second place and me third. I pulled off the greatest move though and fortified my biggest stack right in front of that capital knowing the other player couldn't finish me off that turn. The suicider was busy doing a whole bunch of laughing emojis and saying oops until the next turn when he saw me break through the capital and finish him off. I wish I would've known about reporting though
I've done that in many games when I run out of time to play because of real life shit...not a big issue if someone gets tired of everyone turtling and building up armies and not attacking...many many times I have just said the hell with it this game is boring being played that way. IMO there needs to be a max army limit for each territory and then you will see real strategy...not just the build up a massive army and wait to attack when someone gets bored.
38:30 What a weird bug. The attack times out and does not complete so pink is still sitting with their territory, however green gets their card.
This really really doesn't look like cheating to me. It just looks like both players recognized they needed to weaken you to stand any chance of winning and managed to ally/ work with magenta to do so.
There are previous games that genuinely looked like coordination, but this isn't one of them.
👍yep maybe
I agree, Pete was off his game, you could see that coming a mile away when Magenta basically threw the towel in by taking as much as he could sucking Pete into following him leaving Red an open back door to walk all over him, White ends up looking pretty to take out the game
When Im in 2nd or 3rd I always try and get the other to help take out 1. Its called trying to win...
When red had the game completely won, why did they bypass killing magenta multiple times in order to hand magenta second? Is that not a factor?
@@cardboardu6019 that would be the only thing that looked like Collab to me. At one point he could've easily have taken them both out but magenta was weaker and closer but he chose to go for Pete. Other than that though I was watching thinking if I was red I would've taken Pete out as well.
Thank you for caring about your colorblind viewers Pete 👊. From a colorblind viewer who struggles with orange and yellow in this game
You're welcome
Remember pinks first suicide move hit all players and he left his stack in Europe.
"Has magenta finally bought it" - the captions
its such a funny mix when you swear, people are either incredibly kind or swear profusely but you sir are both and i love it so much, love ya content pete!!
🙏
19:57 "I'm not going to rush, cause I don't want to spoil the surprise" spoken like a real sadist haha xD Nice Game!
Time to catch up on what I have missed in the last month, insane growth pete, well done!
It has been quite the month!
We all should push for a random search for ranked games, would almost end cheating for the most part
I'm curious to see what they come up with for a ranking system next. If it ends up being more fair or more indicative of skill at all
@@TheKillPeteStrategy yeah I sure hope so, I get teamed on so much in ranked but it’s only because of the bad system I feel like.
It's almost like they don't care that there are cheaters. The leaderboard is set up for cheaters. People will host a game and only allow 2 human players to play and have all other AI's. When the AI wins the host still gets the win
Zalarain’s question at 12:00 - I don’t know for sure, but I expect it’s to differentiate the armies by shape as well as color. This would be important for some one that is colorblind, which is a lot more people than many realize.
Edit- Lol. I had paused to write that and just got to 12:33
So helpful. I'm colorblind myself, and some of the colors look exactly the same to me.
love the videos Pete! I'm not too good, but I can often get myself to second place
Lol same
Hey I'm not perfect either. We'll get there with practice.
Have you considered making a video where you talk about the settings and what is helpful? Such as how to get shapes, how to turn off phase change confirmation, and things like that? I think it would be very helpful
I have. Check out my beginners videos. I'm expanding a playlist on the basics.
General noob question. What's the difference between collab (cheating) and an alliance within the game? Are you alerted when other players form an alliance, making it a question of the partnership being secret or not?
The two players could be friends in real life or were controlled by the same person. This means that they have more trust in each other than a general alliance. They will work together in ways that most players can't, giving them an unfair advantage
Alliances are not formal and still leave room for players to make their own choices, including going back on their alliances. That is very different from you telling your friend "Hit that player so I can win the game this time and I'll do the same for you so you can win the next game." Having two players do that pads their stats and makes them seem better than what they are.
I don’t know if they were collaborating, probably just alliance. Also it wasn’t the correct decision for red to kill pink I don’t think. Because pink was attacking you, and it wouldn’t set him in, and there’s no chance for pink to win. And it was clear you were the better player because you were in the lead and you showed your speed at one point. But at the end of the day it’s just bad players making bad decisions.
👍maybe
Yer that's what I was thinking. I'm no pro but I recently made it to GM playing fixed and I definitely leave fish alive if they're committed to f#@king over another player or if i can still make the kill in a turn or two and get more cards or they might pose no threat to me and I can focus on the strongest player instead. But it's more than likely I have the meta completely backwards.
If he wasn't collaborating he could have killed them both off with whites army blocked
It's true, maybe they were not cheating. But the team, who checks the report has access to all games, so they can take a look into those players, how they play in other games. If there is a pattern, then they are cheating. If there is no pattern and this was more like an exception, no action will be taken. The report however was definitively the correct thing to do.
Agreed, Pete just tired and a little pissy. Like a turn before the ‘cheat’ he said now would be the time to take me out
There’s so many factors that play into the strategies in this game that it’s virtually impossible to tell if people are really cheating. This game is designed to be like this, so it feels like you’re being cheated when you lose.
Sometimes it’s better to kill the weaker opponents first, sometimes the strongest.
Every game is different, it often looks and feels others are cheating when they’re not. Especially when you’re on the receiving end of cunning strategies.
Preempting and second guessing opponents, is part and parcel of the game and is the beauty of it.
It’s true that cheaters don’t prosper. If you’re a strong player, you can cope against cheaters in this game. The whole reason they might need to cheat is bc they’re losing. Playing against 5 AIs will show you what it feels like to play against cheaters, as the AIs always work together against the human.
“All’s fair in love and war.”
I rest my case.
Bingo. I don't see any real evidence of collusion and I see lots of evidence against it. Pete just got beat. And then whined about it.
didn't know Ai worked together! that will help my strategy against the bots! :)
In this case, red was cheating. It's pretty obvious.
how is it cheating when alliances are turned on? Please do tell me. What I see as cheating is when Pete will signal to another player his intention to move armies out by targeting but not attacking an area so the other player will move out for him....that is more cheating than having an alliance game where 2 or 3 players gain up on another person...especially when that other person is the strongest army and territory wise (starting at 1:03 was pretty obvious thankyou)@@andrewbuck171
30:08 Pete, in my experience, I think that was a mistake. I have noticed whenever a person gets a stack that is almost double the next highest stack....people tend to target them out of fear that they can Blitz across the board.
I wanted to test to see who went bad neighbour at that point.
@@TheKillPeteStrategy they both went bad neighbor lmao
I do like the traditional map, even if Europe and Asia are alomost impossible to hold. Glad to see the good players don't always zoom in only on Australia.
Love the original map too - taking Australasia is an obviously good move if you can secure it early on but to sit on that alone will NOT win you the game (normally).
Use the early advantage to progress to other advantageous positions and make deals with opponents that are non-threating until the end game.
@@garrywolfe6077 I real prefer South America because you get the same bonus and can move into much easier to hold territories rather than Asia. Even though it's a two point guard instead of one it's still superior to me
Yes Australia doesn’t have an emergency exit.
Honestly, white and green both cheated in this game, too. Green got a card without having to move their stack by burning timer after "confirming" a kill, and not moving accepting the forced decision to move troops. White, meanwhile, fake-botted out to alleviate pressure off of green early on, then fake-botted again at the very end of the game and likely won the entire thing in the end because of it. Fake botting is honestly the most toxic form of cheating IMO, and is far easier to confirm than collaboration.
Yeah it's bad news that scam
“All’s fair in love and war.”
@@flashgordon6670 don’t be an obtuse fuck
What is fake botting?
@@49marquito Seeming to disconnect for a few turns, then reconnecting later when other players have likely realized you botted. People, especially highly rated ones, are less likely to put stock in against a bot and just let them do their thing because bots are stupid. Thus, it buys them time... and then they suddenly reconnect and start making actual human decisions again. One instance of this that happened to me, I was building up to skirt around the bot's stack the very next turn. The human came back and suicided into me, losing the game for BOTH of us instead of me having the ability to go around it and abandon my territory.
It happens in this game too - the white player bots, then all of a sudden later on the white player is back to being human again. What we see of the game implied that white almost WON the entire thing by the bot being ignored, then coming back once they had advantage again. It's not exactly "fake" botting as much as "temporary" botting, but either way it's incredibly unfair because people play differently if they think they're playing against a computer instead of a human.
I don't think red and magenta were Collab anymore than you or red were in the early game. I notice a lot of new and low ranked players see the opportunity to eliminate the strongest player so they take it over the good sportsmanship of 1st and 2nd alliances.
I'm not a particularly strong player, but I play according to how players play in your tournament vids. I find myself saying I'll go first and second all day long. Usually results in the kill me strategy for everyone else. Lol.
That's why he put possibly. But think of the logic of that kill. Red had more troops than blue even if he gets the magenta kill and he gives himself cards giving him a better advantage over the last two players. But killing blue gave him a disadvantage over white. Making them 2nd and third. You could say he made a bad decision but he was logically sound before that kill. Sounds pretty fishy when you look at it like that. I
Regarding Red not being good, if he were good, he wouldn’t have allowed Blue to generate ten at a time when he was equal to Blue in strength, letting Blue effortlessly build a 50 troupe lead.
You deserved better... We deserved better... REGI DESERVED BETTER!!!
We all get exactly what we deserve. Nothing more nothing less.
There is some disagreement on whether players were cheating and if so, who was.
Good news! We have gotten in touch with the cheater scall54 in this game and he has apologized publicly for doing so.
I'm glad the debate is concluded once and for all.
“All’s fair in love and war.”
if it walks like a duck and talks like a duck it's cheating at risk!!!
dont know how its possible im wrong when I didn't suggest anything about cheating, I was just complimenting your level of play...
@@MarvinGunkle he said he was disinterested! DISINERESTEEEEED! haha
It's possible you should change the title of the video to suit
“All’s fair in love and war.”
that was a salty report Pete
👍
Thank you for colorblind mode :) helps a lot for me :)
You're welcome!
This man said he would never do a mukbang or eat on camera, and here he is munchin on jerky sticks.
every time i watch you play you become the puppet master turning others into each other
Well the fish stinks alwyays from the top. I totally agree with you nevertheless I am afraid to das that at least 3 decades politicians are not good examples. It dies not excuse cheating but I see their point, too.
However, great work. Keep going. All the best 🙏🏽🍀♥️
It would have been good to keeping watching the game after you were killed. That's when you can really catch cheaters. Possibly Red and white were the same person. And red would give the game to the white player in the end, because that was the better account (grandmaster rank). Remember Jessie the Body said "Win if you can, lose if you must, but always cheat" 😄 don't get mad Pete. Enjoy the game whatever happens. Then you will be more than a grandmaster, you will be a Risk Jedi!
My philosophy for this video work is that it has to be fun for me first. Everything else is secondary. So in that way it is very unlikely I'm ever going to sit and watch a game that is uninteresting to me.
i find it odd that early in the match the alliance with red and white that helped you build a troop lead is now cheating later in the match when red and magenta team up to remove the player with the most troops. i agree with the red players choice to attack you and leave magenta as he was no threat at that point. you had the troop lead and better map control. the only way for them to overcome that was to team up. seems like poor sportsmanship to call someone a cheater just because they beat you at a game.
Yep
I'm a bad sport
And I'm bad at the game
@@TheKillPeteStrategy wow! The arrogance of this answer - you are clearly VERY good at this game but you are showing your true colours with these comments. You were outplayed - simple as that. What a prick
See I don’t understand your thought process if you are playing a FFA match how could it not be cheating if you team hell COD and val take it so seriously in some cases they’ve gone to court about it because it’s for money so even top notch games think it’s cheating you make no sense
That's why he put possibly. But think of the logic of that kill. Red had more troops than blue even if he gets the magenta kill and he gives himself cards giving him a better advantage over the last two players. But killing blue gave him a disadvantage over white. You could say he made a bad decision but he was logically sound before that kill. Sounds pretty fishy when you look at it like that
@@winthechatbaby6655 right who wouldn’t take a free kill on magenta assuring victory for themselves
You can really tell the difference in mic quality more than anything (except the old territory design)
21:14 Pete, normally I don't like Cats. I am a dog fan. But I like seeing Reggie. Particularly, I like seeing the 'belly smacks'.
I like seeing him too 😻
Hey Pete!
This is so frustrating! Either they were collabing or they were making bad plays there is no in between haha! Personally I think they were just dunces and not playing at the standards someone like yourself would expect
I've been binging your content but I gotta say I can see why Red would capitalize off the situation
I feel your pain!! Watched this after it happened to me, although my game was quicker and more blatant. Probably the same person. LIFE TIME BAN
Yep I don’t understand how anyone could see this isn’t cheating it’s the same as teaming in cod or any other game just because it give you a higher chance to win doesn’t mean you should do it. Aim bot makes my aim 1000 times better I’m not using it because it cheating
Red and magenta were definitely teaming in favour of white, might explain their grandmaster rank 🤷♂️
Who knows eh
Was magenta teaming with white when he kept attacking white in Africa? Was white teaming with magenta when he killed 30 of his units?
time to evaluate priorates if cheating at Risk
lol for real
I would give Pink second if he suicided into the big player giving me the win. You have done it in previous videos as well. They could have been working together and when Pink broke every players continent and left his stack in Europe it was just to make it look like he breaking red as well.
I don't think they were collabing Pete, it all fits within the alliance game, that's why i always filter it out.
👍
Maybe
That's why he put possibly. But think of the logic of that kill. Red had more troops than blue even if he gets the magenta kill and he gives himself cards giving him a better advantage over the last two players. But killing blue gave him a disadvantage over white. You could say he made a bad decision but he was logically sound before that kill. Sounds pretty fishy when you look at it like that
This was definitely cheating. I have a feeling all 3 of them were in cahoots, but most definitely Magenta and Red. Magenta suiciding into you to let red win is such an obvious tell. When Magenta broke Red and Red had the opportunity to break Magentas NA, he didn’t, instead he went around the whole map to kill Pete. They also attacked at the exact same speed. Plus, the fact that the guy admitted to it speaks for itself since he probably got banned and wanted to “apologize” so perhaps he can get unbanned. That’s just my two cents on it
That's hilarious how you named the cheaters in the description.
Not here to have a conversation about it but here to say that Red would have had an excellent chance at winning at the end if he didn't hit your stack. But since he did, it was most likely that white won at the end. This doesn't seem a like a move that someone trying to win solo would do, but who knows.
Love your risk videos, I watch almost all of them, but just a curious question, are you good at chess?
No, I don't have that kind of mind.
I have this happen to me... very new to this game, my rank is currently intermediate but I beat masters and GMs periodically... many times I will see this happen to me when I ally with one.. then the other is non stop sacraficing himself to break me. very annoying I have had to change strategies to never ally with people now.
50:39 I started playing because of you
Awesome!
I'm glad you're having fun.
Pete is pissed but he would have done the same if the roles were inversed. Let’s not forget that everyone is trying to win right
Right on.
@@TheKillPeteStrategy Hey i’m addicted to your Risk videos, I like your intensity ☝️
That's why he put possibly. But think of the logic of that kill. Red had more troops than blue even if he gets the magenta kill and he gives himself cards giving him a better advantage over the last two players. But killing blue gave him a disadvantage over white. You could say he made a bad decision but he was logically sound before that kill. Sounds pretty fishy when you look at it like that
1:11:25 is when you know that was collaboration. red could easily get the kill on pink and then on blue. Yet he continues to chase after the kill on blue even though pink is right next to blue. You can't even call that a bad player making a bad play as red is going out of his way to not only kill blue first but to also let pink live and rebuild.
👍
bullshit...Pete could have easily taken him out as well...why didn't he? Seems like a useless collaboration claim....especially since Pete does this all the time and will "communicate" to other players by targeting but not attacking certain zones. Maybe it is Pete that deserves the collaboration report and ban for cheating like he does?
I know only a little about Risk so I apologize if this question is ignorant. What is the difference between requesting to be in an alliance in the game and collaboration? Don’t both have the players working together?
👍
Difference is that the alliance inside the game is a soft agreement, you can break it, it is more like a notion of lets cooperate. For now. It has the biggest impact in fog games because the vision is shared. It has no guaranties. It is only valid for one game at the best.
If two players who are communicating outside the game join the same game and their goal is to go trade wins between each other to rank up that is probably a an offense that should be banned because they give each other a huge amount of unfair advantage. This kind of alliance goes trough multiple games for the benefit of them both. That is why it is way stronger.
How does this apply inside a single game?
Advantage of collaboration is based on the fact that if a 3rd player decides to stab a 1st player they can count on the 2nd player to keep them safe and gift them the 2nd place because their deal spans multiple games so they have to keep their word or the whole things falls trough.
If not collaborating a 3rd player would not find it in their interest to go for a 1st player because then the 2nd player just eats them up once they are week and solidify the 2nd place for them at minimum.. or even get even more ahead if they had plenty of cards.
Strange ending, definitely. My senses were telling me that Red is maybe collaborating with White... (also 2 australian flags)... if you pay attention to Whites 2nd Bot out then you will notice that the Bot never takes control of his game completely... White never closed the game... for me it looked like the Bot out Scumbag Strategy... I wonder if white would have come back after Red had done his "job"... but who knows...
Terrible if that's what happened
Don't cheat on Pete.
Ideally not
16:48 - That escalated quickly! It got out of hand really fast! Yellow *killed* a guy!
Is cheating a thing in Risk? I have had a few games where another player has been getting a suspicious number of reinforcements without the territories to generate them. I had a game last night where the player was up to 30 reinforcements after only 3 moves. Fog of war was on but there were only 2 territory sets that I couldn't see which would have only generated a maximum of 10 reinforcements (5 each)
Yeah we are expected to report suspicious activity from players.
I love how skilled you are, but that was salty AF.. magenta got his revenge deal with it..
Yeah man. As I mentioned in the pinned comment.
I got collabed during a game of progessive once. It was a 3 player collab. I was fortunate enough to kill one of the players but couldn't get the final 2... I was so mad. I reported all parties for collab. I further knew it was a collab when I damaged one of the remaining 2 collaborators (who had more cards than me) enough to where the other player would be better off killing them, setting in, then killing me, but they destroyed me first. Such BS when it takes more than 1 player to beat you...
I wish there was a better automated detection for this sort of thing so that it happens less often.
@@TheKillPeteStrategy Would be nice!
Love playing Risk when I’m on the elliptical. Basically I enter a 6 player world domination game. I know full well I’m most likely the only player playing the game without a burner account. So I I just load up on one country inside the continent of Asia because there’s no way anyone is going to conquer Asia. Then I watch the burner accounts take each other out after 40 minutes. I usually have about 50 armies with only two legit players left in the game. I usually lose, but an hour on the elliptical goes by pretty fast when you’re trying to embarrass cheaters. It’s actually very satisfying when I lose and see a Master is actually playing the game. I always send them a friend request.
BAD LOOSER.....BUT REALLY GOOD WINNER!!!!
PERSONNALY I PLAY 28/30 GAME AND ONLY 2 /30 ARE GOOD PARTIE WITH GOOD PLAYERS .____😑🤔😤
2 mois maintenant que je joue a risk je suis accro souvent souvent le joueur qui creer une parite toujours avec des fucking both(agressive)
is it reallu to hard for her to put the fucking but settting FACILE😡!!!!!!!!!!!!´É¬&?%?????????????? WHY YOU PLAY LIKE THIS SI TES POUR VOULOIR JOUER TOUSEUL JOU TOUT SEUL ABEC T BOTHE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I THIINK THIS BOTH OPTION IS A REALLYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY BAD!🤬👎🌎
1:12:00 I don't get it, why doesn't that play from red make sense? Magenta is practically dead, white is a bot, and there is a blue player that has been doing quite well, who's slightly weaker than they are. So red slams blue into the ground, and remains stronger than the blue and magenta players combined. The only player that can beat them is the white bot who has their 95 stack locked. With this play red can kill both magenta and blue in the next couple of turns, and then slowly take out the bot, which should be doable since bots are even slower than the red player is. If the red player was a GM and made that move, I wouldn't bat an eye. The only reason why this is suspicious to me is that they're an intermediate (spoilers). But even then, it's a possible play you can make. For the magenta player: "Don't attribute to malice that which can be explained by stupidity." They're a beginner (spoilers again, but it was kind of obvious from the start), so they could just be bored of a 1H game and tried to suicide into someone to be done with the game.
👍 maybe
@@TheKillPeteStrategy The argument might be made on the turn when magenta was right next to his stack with less troops and fewer territories giving red a trade in turn and he still went straight for pete.
Counter argument would be red not card blocking you when magenta tried to.
Would be awesome to get a confirmation from pete after getting the notification from the game.
@@uranalaj2415 I doubt they'll give me anything.
Who knows
@@TheKillPeteStrategy I just get the … has been given a warning.
You don’t get to actually see this too often, i enjoyed the variety given the 500 videos of you kicking ass. Must have been infuriating for you though.
Good luck in everything else pete!
I've never seen someone drink so much and not have to go take a piss like crazy! I can look at water and have to go take a leak.
Urine luck! I just did
@@TheKillPeteStrategy The pee heard around the world with the power of 5 cokes and 3 coffees!
I had a situation where a player decided to come from Siam and destroy half my stack in Greenland so another player could take me out. They were out 2 turns later and had no reason to do it other than they just wanted to either screw me over or help the other player.
Sus!
Sounds upsetting!
@@TheKillPeteStrategy 😆
sometimes when im playing ranked i dont get xp after. is there a reason for that?
The battle points cap at 1250 a day I think.
@@TheKillPeteStrategy Thanks Pete
Good fun content. Thanks. p.s. Australia rocks.
Ugh another turtle!
Haha
To be fair, Red may have been capitalizing on Magenta's targeting your position without a collaboration.
This one isnt a mystery anymore. The cheater admitted it.
What are the stick things you're eating called? They look delicious
MEAT STICKS
I only clicked on this video because I agree with the title.
sorry if you got this comment already but I couldnt find it, I'm curious what your thought process was around 1:03:00 to give pink a favorable path to Sue on you. In my eyes you had a pretty clear 1st place lead prior to this, I thought initially attacking reds 3 for a card, then splitting the 89 if needed to the 100 to possibly deter magenta from Sueing on you since magenta and white werent on good terms. I know in hindsight its easy for me to say this but watching that decision in real time got me head scratching. Is this normally a good play if red wasnt a scumbag?
I know I’m late but I think white was in on it too. White just happens to bot out (but never actually leaves) when red and pink start collabing. In fact, maybe it was white and red collabing and pink was just spared .
I'm color blind so I appreciate the setting.
You're welcome!
These are enjoyable streams and super informative...but this dude's DRAMAAAA lolll
🤣
"im addicted to this game cause of you." yep me too lol, also watched like 6 hours of vids and watching this one as i play
Don't blame me dude! LOL
@@TheKillPeteStrategy XD
I feel like red goes out of the way to accommodate white in Europe in the early game and, given what eventually plays out, seems highly suspect. It’s par for the course with Risk but no less frustrating when it happens - longer term it has the potential to push away newer players (and I say this as a new player - finding your channel inspired me to start playing).
Talking about wasting time, I missed 9-5 and 3-1, which happens 3 in 1000 times. This happens a lot? I’ve got you to blame, since you got me interested in the game. :)
Wow those are some bad dice
How do you have those icons instead of round pieces as i have instead of having those geometrical forms. Sorry for my emglish, im spanish but is watch all your videos to learn how to play. Keep on doing bro
I think rushing to cheating is a bad look for you. You're pretty intense in these videos and clearly competitive, I'd tone down the cheating accusations, you don't need to make them and it just makes you look like a sore loser. Clearly the end of this game was emotional for several players. Magenta suicided, White quit and Red (as you said yourself) wasn't very good, but they probably recognised that you were the clear one to beat at that point. I've enjoyed the few videos I've watched of yours so far, but this one really put me off.
Right on man.
It possible I was wrong
To me red was the best on the board.
I always enjoy games where it takes multiple enemies working together to take me down. Shows who the real threat is :)
Kudos!
You play a mean America my friend. Really enjoy the videos and commentary.
Eating dead flesh for a snack... Nice ;)
Om nom nom
I dislike white botting in and out. If pink and red were collabing, they did a great job of not making it super obvious.
Yeah a lot of people were saying that it was red and white.
@@TheKillPeteStrategy I share in your frustration lately on some of the games though. Something is different and I can't put my finger on what.
1:07:43 too aggressive into red and blocked him from taking his continent, ending the peace. Also misplayed Asia with Magenta 41:00. Should have consolidated your stack when he moved part of his stack to challenge you. A divided stack is a juicy target. Your goal is to preserve material always. Even after the attack he exposed himself as a loose cannon. Better to pull back and allow him to block himself further and from there punish any further threatening stacks with a far larger stack. Also better he be given the opportunity to grow and threaten red rather than antagonize him and then later antagonize red as I pointed out, ie. gg
I always picture Australia plus China India and Siam as a big lady wearing a towel on her head looking at her phone, just a thought
Hahah, oh no, now I'm always gonna see it.
They weren’t teaming… just lower rated players lmao 😂 happens all the time
Maybe.
Rubbing your face while eating meat sticks at 02:00 is some wild behavior
🙏
Just curious. How was it cheating if you have messages saying to attack certain colors with your alliance?
Red & White both Australians and never attacked each other was the real collaboration. Getting rid of the strongest player (you) was the correct play. Would have liked to see how it ended.
Whether or not it was correct in your opinion red admitted to cheating after the fact so the case here is closed.
@@TheKillPeteStrategy yes cheating, but with white not pink. I've been teamed up on when I'm the strongest player too. I enjoy your videos and think you've improved in the year since this video was uploaded.
@@TheKillPeteStrategy I've learned from you to keep composure, be patient, be malleable, which has helped in Risk and life. This game wasn't you at your finest.
The real scumbag was white with the fake bot out strategy. Red was just taking advantage of Magenta having a thing for you and wanted to reward him with second or just wanted him to take as much out of you as he could given that he saw you as the better player. I do agree with reporting tho, it's better to over report than to under report.
Yeah, some have said. I hope they get what's coming to them.
I love your streams but have severe misophonia. As soon as you reach for the snacks it makes me want to either punch a wall or cry. 😂
Yeah I try not to eat on stream if I can avoid it.
Did they get rid of the info next to the player avatars or is that only for online games? I’m playing a solo game and don’t have that.
Yes they did.
I once played with my friend too, but we didn't collaborate and he even suicided into me as he always does XD
Just be careful if you do it in global and you get caught you guys can have your accounts banned.
@@TheKillPeteStrategy yeah, now i know. We decided to play together and after the game I accidentally bumped into the rule "don't play Global Domination with someone you know" and we decided to never do it again
@@TheKillPeteStrategy and thank you for the heart 😁
BUT .... i like You PeteKillller!! :D you are really nice guy ans i like your minds !! and you are such patient guy !!xoxooxoxxxxoxoxx
and your Catttt🐱🐾🐾🐾🐾🐾
charismatique guy
that hurts. i feel for u
why doesn't pete join up his Siberia pieces to north america at 28:00?
I didn't see a need to. Better to get that guaranteed card next turn.
My last game was very strange aswell. One player went from the other side of the map straight to me, killed me, got two cards from me and he had no troops left to defend himself. He now had 4 cards and two players had the chance to defeat him but chilled instead (i watched the game after i got defeated) then they went 3v1 on another player. I reported them but i didn't get a response.
I hate when that happens.
There’s so many factors that play into the strategies in this game that it’s virtually impossible to tell if people are really cheating. This game is designed to be like this, so it feels like you’re being cheated when you lose.
Hey Pete, I rarely comment, but I saw a lump on your left bicep, have you checked it out? Love the vids btw.
My muscles are growing muscles. Nothing to worry about 🤣🤣🤣
I knew they were collaborating from the moment Magenta first broke you, because if Red couldn't get his bonus, they weren't going to let you even though you weren't the one that did it.
There seems to be a lot of disagreement on this from the peanut gallery.
Who knows.
@@TheKillPeteStrategy As a noob to this online game, as I watched that end game, I thought it was just 2 players joining up to take out the stronger player, but in your experienced opinion, why the accusations of cheating? Thanks for your input.
Lol, got hammered
Slammed!
You have an interesting wait and watch strategy for risk!
Hi Pete, What´s the difference between an alliance and a collaboration?
That was a legit question, not a sarcastic comment... :)
I played like 5 games, 4 of them had cheaters (1 person with 2 accounts in the same lobby) does it get better in ranked or is this just mostly a casual thing? I used to play a lot and I don't remember it being THIS bad. Doesn't help that the devs removed the rank limiter for when you create lobbies.
I think one of the ways we deal with cheating in this way is we loudly and repeatedly ask them to please block two accounts from playing eachother ranked within the same week or two. Force the cheaters to make new accounts each time.
Well said Reggie!! 👏
😻
That's is the problem with this game. teaming and suicides happen all the time. Every player in every game can control who wins and loses by doing one or the other. Lower level players seem to to do it more. I say this but I still play the shit out of it. lol
It's a pretty big flaw. But yeah I still play a bunch too.
teaming and suicides are part of the game and always have been, even 50 years ago. When i was at college there were a few tourneys involving 30 plus players. I won the first two but after that every time i played all five others teamed up to kill me then sorted it out amongst themselves. annoyed the hell out of me so i used the suicide strategy. that was the first to hurt me gets it. I got a couple of games again by making them in fight until they worked around it.
1:15:16 Bro, that was the SAME PLAYER with 2 different accounts. You thought Pink was the threat, but he revealed his cards at the end. Red was the REAL turtle, building up his troops. Used Pink to weaken you, and used his REAL acct to kill you. THIS is why I uninstalled RISK. I have reported so many players and risks responds (most of the time) t hat they suspended the player. Why not BAN these people? SMG, pull your head out and REMOVE these people's accts for cheating!
I'm not as good of a player as you, but I know I would of been a Master. Instead, when I uninstalled I was an Expert.
The settings I usually play don't lend themselves to cheating as badly so I guess I don't see it as much.
@@TheKillPeteStrategy I think I'm going to reinstall RISK. I hate the cheating that happens, but I love the game. That and watching you play makes me want to play more. Yep. I think I'm going to reinstall it.