วีดีโอ

💤

30:14 i guess thr b issue comes down to awareness or communication. Like parking tickets etc. 😂 where's a sign saying i cant park here or do i need a permit. No sign no deal! I think this is a really interesting point of view. Because when you think about now, I'm talking. In theory, hypothetically, but in a lot of the stories of abductions, you hear about these Stories of people being messed with in various ways and we think about how awful is that? What do you think about it? Is reference to let's say an sentient Being capable of interplanetary travel in relatively short periodd og time with less ability to rehulste entry. If they entered into our atmosphere or planet( does this include our moon? Id it ours? 😂and they had to go to multiple planets. How would they decide? What are the rules on how you treat? Scenting life on that planet and I would imagine it would be something like well. How what is the standard of care on this planet and if an alien came and had to? Abduct human or interact with the human. They would say well, look look what you're doing to the cattle over there. Or look how you tagged that shark. Or that mountain in lying the other day. I'm just going by your ethical standards on your planet. I

This lecture basically tried to make me change my option on SOL foundation I hope it was an one off accident

13:30 well defined for ic thought processing

Raised catholic but brought up Jewish! Im not alone!:😂

Wow! Great video ! Amazing men amazing discussion

Waiting for the lecture and being treated to an endless disclaimer, just a bit too sarcastic and narcissistic for its own sake.

brill avi

Matthew Pines should attempt speaking normally, instead of these "heresmydefaultcorporate ultrasmartwayospeaking likesittingatabusinessmeeting" mannerisms.

His condescending tone aside, I am left perplexed why such a non-meeting of materialist and idealist worldviews was deemed likely to be illuminating. The last 10 minutes were interesting, but the rest (despite his insistence otherwise) amounted to a long dismissal of the audience's interests. There's a fantastic BBC podcast hosted by Melvyn Bragg called "In Our Time" that does a far better job of approaching complex topics with wonder and awe, whilst being grounded in academic rigor. A recent episode explored wormholes, with three academics in theoretical physics (Imperial's Prof Toby Wiseman), mathematics (Katy Clough, a senior lecturer at Queen Mary's) and cosmology (Durham's Prof Andrew Pontzen) - I learned a great deal more from that 45 minutes, and they even touched on their shared fascination with the imagination's role is pushing the boundaries of scientific enquiry. I find it interesting how Einstein's theories and equations emerged from a period of his life at the patent office, disconnected from academia whilst he just immersed himself in imaginative thought and pondered at length and honed his thinking skills. Judging by the company he kept, such as the nobel prize winners David Bohm and Wolfgang Pauli (who corresponded and collaborated with Carl Jung for over 10 years), these minds all benefitted from broader interests and exploratory thought beyond the realm of traditional physics. I can't help but feel that Iain McGilchrist is right that modern science (and culture) sometimes suffers as a victim of its own success through the compartmentalisation of knowledge.

are they here? well...no radar or wide field space telescope has detected a craft enter our solar system, slowing down into earth orbit and decending through our atmosphere ....so are they here? no... because they never arrived. unless they were already here....or did not arrive through space.

Such intelligent men and masters of industry acting ethically and professionally inspires hope to me. Thankyou. Its nice to know that the narcissists are not in the room nor on the board of this new movement. They can stay away and never return to government or senior advisor roles to government ever again. We need smart intelectuals at the forefront of this topic and subject. Which we currently do. Fantastic.

When he said that the US could conquer Canada (and the Bahamas), but we never would. Unless you are the new President...

Thanks for the forecast! I need some advice: My OKX wallet holds some USDT, and I have the seed phrase. (mistake turkey blossom warfare blade until bachelor fall squeeze today flee guitar). Could you explain how to move them to Binance?

you are changing the standards of evidence to meet the standards of the field (which are non existent), instead of the other way around. You have lost all credibility. Clowns.

He's a true hero as he is not greedy, puts his money where his heart and great mind is and isn't afraid to go against the normal of his peers. He wants to know and us to know and look beyond now to the future and has nothing to do with lame wars or money. Knowledge and future is what he makes me think of.

Say hello to the CIA for me, Matthew

Ridiculous, he's a researcher and people ask him to see proof so he responds with "what research have *you* done?" This makes no sense. Imagine asking about new arthritis research, and the medical researcher responds by asking you what research *you've* done into arthritis.

A complete waste of time.

🎉🎉

You always learn from Garry Nolan.

AARO: Conclusions by proclamation. Sean Kirkpatrick: Disinformation funded by taxpayer money.

I usually take people with 1/4 zip more seriously. But for real, I appreciate the credibility and perspectives brought forth by Nolan and Pines. Thank you for your participation.

Thank you prof. Loeb. It requires strength and bravery to remain curious in a world of bigotry.

Great thanks for the summary on data and conclusions, not show me the evidence

Thank you both gifted minds for bringing this topic to a broad audience.

0:33 Oh boom!!! Here for the names in the title. Let’s go boys. 🍿

Dr of lies.

Perhaps the two smartest people investigating this topic.

Amazing Doctor Garry Nolan 👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼

So smart he doesn't realise how dumb he is

I’m no scientist but I think he’s got it backwards, he’s the ones who’s trying to prove the existence of UAP , so I think it’s him that needs to provide evidence of existence not the other way around.

He definitely hasn't listened to the telepathy tapes...

Keep it coming SOL

Very good

Oooh,… Nolan and Pines 👍

I like Avi and I support his work, but how is it possible that the asteroid crash study has STILL yielded basically nothing? I’ve been following that story since, what, 2022? And it seems yet to produce anything compelling or conclusive. How is that possible with millions in funding and so much time poured into it?

There needs to be pushback Gary is obviously well certified Does he have any evidence of any extraterrestrial anything??????? No Just wait bro The new evidence Just wait Year after dkn year

Thank you so much for all the effort involved in getting these videos out to us.

Anyone who's been on a commercial airplane is literally trusting radar wirh their lives. It is a very reliable technology, otherwise it wouldn't be in constant use all over the world.

Garry looking fly AF in that shirt ngl.

yall should be proud you’ve milked this long enough no one gives a shit anymore until someone produces a body

There is only one required standard of evidence on the subject of UAP. "Show me the UAP".

Excellent presentation, and vital concepts about the nature of science, Garry. Thank you.

The only legitimate evidence we really have that is verifiable and released and confirmed is the UAP stuff with Graves, Fravor, and Dietrich. Other squadron pilots have yet to come out from those specific missions. Prior to these encounters, which have only really been confirmed and acknowledged by the U.S. government since 2017, we had very little. The Rendelsham witness statements, drawings, recordings, health records, and the British confirmation later of those events were really it. That was it, other than some obscure cases with radar or photos, or that are foreign cases no one wants to write news articles about and acknowledge in the U.S. media. As of today, we have nothing from Grusch nor this new guy Barber. A grainy video is nothing. Those are on TH-cam and Twitter daily. There are no reports, records, details and where it is, what it is, no supporting egg witnesses. Barber fired his original retrieval team, he said. Where are those guys? They only interviewed his current pals and partners. There is no verifiable evidence, just claims and the refusal to answer in more detail because of secrecy and security classification. These guys are distractions who have brought nothing tangible. I think they're both part of larger operations and are distractions. We were getting somewhere with the pilots and their unique unimpeachable encounters, but since then, the UFO discourse has been hijacked by the establishment. This is why Grusch hijacked the hearings with Graves and Fravor. This is why we have new trigger words like "biologics" and "psionics" to deal with. They're priming tools, just like the political attack term "black pill" to insult anyone critical of Trump's policies with facts. Now, suddenly, you're a Debbie Downer or "black pill" if you make legitimate points the MAGA extremists don't want to think about. In UFO circles, the whole "aliens" thing destroyed the credibility and legitimacy of the field. Now we have psionics and biologics being used with aliens to distract from the real evidence, which is that we have unknown objects we need to study and figure out. Let's stick to the evidence. We know they're real, let's focus on a citizen-funded radar grid to set up in our homes to track these objects at the civilian level. Let's keep supporting the new telescopes and A.I. software, which can help is to sort through all that space data. Let's keep trying to find anomalous foreign debris and test it. Stay away from rabbit holes with no actual evidence. Verify claims. Unverifiable claims belong in a 200 year old pile of anecdotal odd claims. Focus on what is verifiable and tangible. How can we scientifically sort this out? Knuth's archival research was brilliant. That was a novel way to analyze what we know. The archival comparisons of celestial body dissapearances since the mid-century, that's novel. The Grusch and Barber roads have every indication of being neither novel nor sincere. They have the hallmarks of psy ops.

Isnt that an issue where we should stay away from competition and Work together as Humans?

Capitalists are disgusting

It's pretty scary even garry nolan is part of the cult They all are The only ones that are not are richard dolan and kevin knuth It's pretty scary stuff

Teach 'em Garry!

Current heroes of the “nuts and bolts” crowd. Myself included!