วีดีโอ

That's a whole lot of words to say nothing at all. I don't think my problem is with whether or not Laibach are fascists as much as fascists believe that Laibach are fascists.

Laibach has demonstrated that fascism and communism are from one bird its two wings 🤷🏻‍♂️

This guy is so full of shit lately. I'm here for Laibach - and not this communist bullshitter

Resistance is futile....

It's strange how Zizek puts into words the obvious, and somehow struggles with it, because the obvious is so... untangible, strange, weird. Easy to understand, intuitively, but hard to explain. Points to Zizek for trying :)

« Inconsistent bric-à-brac » 😂😂😂❤

"Eccentric core" ! Me like ... However as long as keep pushing the idea of love along the line of degrees and levels these paradigms evermore will disturb the very act of loving. Loving in all it's spectrality. The concept always will.put limits to an operation which needs no description. The deeds PRRECISELY stand and fall for and by themselves, I claim. SORRY, I talk too much😊

9:43 Red Flood reference

They are losing me a bit with the discussion on China... it's Van who exactly?

Is there any chance of a political economy that the many can understand, not just the few? (Green Fire, UK) 🌈🦉 PS: This conversation is immensely illuminating. Particularly interesting on China...

Please complete 5 time transection then video upload

20:25 balls of steel

Zizek is so fucking stupid, and still acts like wisdom shines out his ass. Laibach is too good for the likes of him, I suppose.

1:00:16 La tercera internacional

Love does seem to be born out of our social-relations as an obstacle. While sexuality, on the other hand, as something that needs to be emancipated, does not at all seem correct, under the present social-relations.

Quantum mechanics are a treat

my two favorite contemporary intellectuals on the same stage... now that's a treat! Thanks Indigo festival!!

A similar observation can be made of Verhoeven's Starship Troopers (the sort of film that a fascist society would make), which is why it is brilliant satire, too. Laibach, however, turned the ambiguity up to 11

This is by far the greatest compilation of clips on Laibach to be found on the web!

Mr Varoufakis,always interesting 🤔

Wow

You don't get it.

Well; inflation has taken a bit of a jump of late.....

Love them both but Varoufakis' point about the supposed lack of Imperialism and Colonialism of China falls moot when he mentioned just sentences prior their atrocities in Tibet and Turkestan which certainly amounts to Imperialism, ethnic cleansing and an extremely thorough colonial project unseen since the American manifest destiny.

It's so weird to hear a public finance official speak in Marxist terminology.

Thanks a lot for mirroring this.

1:41:35 Zizek is so annoyed by Varoufakis's sudden bout of political correctness lol

It's funny to hear a greek man talk about how we italians used to always try and screw the germans at their own game, too bad that time has gone

Zizek is turning more and more into a marxist Donald Duck

There are so many reasons I love this, what a joy to watch

1:12:46 feminine intuition

When verofakis says he has an ideological opposition to giving a shit about why the PM didn't go ahead with his plan I think he means that because this happened his plans were always untenable. The PM and syriza were never going to be able to buck all the pressure put on them, which is why he's looking for another avenue and not just thinking "well of our PM had more of a backbone it would have worked out"

When Yanis mentions that there's a 600 page book about his plan right at the beginning, which book is he referring to?

@01:18:12 that didn't age well

“What has Capitalism ever done for us ?” …………. Fill in as appropriate!

With billions and billions and trillions and trillions everything will happen faster and faster

why is the audience constantly laughing, morons

It’s true that China’s influence in Africa isn’t as horrible as Europe’s. That doesn’t mean it‘s “just business”. There aren’t Chinese troops killing Zulus, but the economic relations (even if they are “voluntary” now) are still pretty similar to the imperial ones Walter Rodney wrote about - exploitation of African labour and natural resources in exchange for Chinese infrastructure, with the lion’s share of the profits ending up in foreign cities. Indeed, the Europeans also tried to claim that they gave Africans schools, hospitals and railroads as credits for robbing them. Nothing’s really changed.

Always nice to see a fellow Belgian spreading the good word of leftism :D

Antifa are the only fascists I know

When Yanis said "North" in Macedonia all his talk about being a Marxist, Left-winger, Subversive, Communist just evaporates like a drop in the sand of hypocrisy....think about it Yanis, just think about it...Macedonia was forced to change its name by the neo-liberal establishment and right wing populism that you say is the biggest problem in the world today...

the monthy python at the end deserves an applause!!!!

47:00 China is imperialist though, Tibet would like to have a word with you

wow... i was really disappointed and even sad to see Varoufakis at the end of the video getting pissed off and angry at a regular person with a regular question ... in those moments you can really estimate how much a man is grown

Damn! I think I got my answer. As I am seeing This Forum being held in English I was thinking to myself, damn! Europeans are encouraged to speak two or three languages and we in America barely speak one (the working class, apart from school costing an arm and a leg) that way we don't have solidarity with the Europes. Then I hear Varoufakis say political candidates in the U.S. can't participate in an international organization. BAM! there it goes.

Alenka is kawaii asf

This talk was amasing !

The guy is great. Too bad I can't understand him English as second language myself.

so if I remember correctly Vanis was part of a leftist party in Greece which indeed managed to win the elections. afterwards they weren't able to do anything against the transnational capitalists represented by IMF, ECB etc. so how is creating a party supposed to change anything?

With regards to China And how Yannis said they never colonised anyone. What about Tibet? Manchuria? And probably a host of ethnic Muslim countries in the west including the elimination of the Uyghurs (weegors) his whole credibility is brought into question by not mentioning this