วีดีโอ

For what it’s worth, it’s never once been in the shop and I’ve had this thing for over 20 years, including a huge chunk of time where I was less than careful with my gear (touring, recording, being a goofy kid). That said, I’m sure some of the Mark series or the Road King are a repair person’s worst nightmare though. If that worries you then I wouldn’t be afraid to go the Kemper/AxeFX route. I’ve heard some incredible models that more than pass the test. I can’t imagine not using the recto tone somewhere in most of the music I make. Thank you for watching and being here!

@@BradDollar Good point! Thanks for the advice..good info & I'll stay posted and like and subscribe!

Love it! Also, give Ableton Live a shot too. The learning curve is real smooth and honestly super fun. This is a great step in that direction though. Thanks for being here and watching!

@@BradDollar being that I’m already on the hook for $35 a month for PT, I’m just gonna stick with it. Hate learning new programs!

That's a stellar collection! And a killer use of multiple units. Definitely makes me want to get another. Did you ever try the Boss DD20? Also, for being watching! I really appreciate it.

@BradDollar I have not but the more I dive into boss delays the more I want to. I have a waza dm I really like as well. Been eyeballing the dsd 2 and 3, and a few odd ball boss delays. Used their all fairly afforable... well at least the compact ones.

😂 Great to have you here!

You're totally right! I'm trying to get better about always have sound samples. Appreciate having you here all the same.

One of the all time greats! Real happy to have you here!

Thank you! I appreciate that a ton.

You got this! Music is a path that can wind on in many different directions and at different speeds. The fact that you're trying to do it at all means you're winning. You're definitely not too late! Great to have you here!

You gotta hear em! Not sure where you live but there are a bunch of shops and showrooms that have pairs you can go listen. Also, it could be worth the $100/hr to go rent a studio space that has a pair and listen back to your tracks. You’ll know right away if you like these things or not. Let me know if you get to try them! Appreciate you being here and watching!

I haven’t used the AER personally. I’ve never really put it in the same camp due to price and honestly, it running off of a power supply and not phantom power is a dealbreaker for me. It also looks prone to breaking with that type of case and those cheaper exposed knobs. That said, I’m sure it’s cool (Tommy Emmanuel uses one so it can’t be that bad right?) and it certainly won’t make anything sound worse! If I ever get my hands on one, I’ll put it up against the LR Baggs. Thank you for being here and watching!!

@@BradDollar First, thank you for your kind answer. I have both. And man, I can assure you the AER body is, even though made from aluminium, it is almost bullet proof. Nos cratches or any sign of usage after 5 years! The knobs are solid as solid can be, everything is high end, but what else would you expect for almost 700 bucks? While the Baggs provide 48V phantom, the AER provides 24V phantom to condenser mics but it doesn´t operate on phantom power, as you well remarked. I power it with a 24V power bank (meant for laptops) and it works just fine for about 50 hours. The main difference though, is the approach to tone shaping, the Baggs has a much easier straight forward way to adjust low, mid and high EQ levels while it also lets you adjust the notch per string (A, D, G, B). The Baggs also has an FX Loop balanced in/output for external FX´s devices or pedals connected via a splitter, which can be great for those who want to add that external FX before it is amplified and EQ is added by the Baggs. The AER doesn't have an FX Loop balanced bin/output and then a big difference is that for EQ adjustments on an AER Colouriser you first chose an EQ bandwidth and only then adjust the amount of increase or decrease. So it's literally just 1 EQ level setting. The Biggs has 3. My experience is the Baggs is easier to re-adjust quickly during a concert and being powered by external phantom is a huge plus. I am very interested though in hearing your opinion if maybe you get the chance to test one and compare. Thank you.

I love this! Seriously, this part all day. Being inspired is easy, seeing ideas to completion is much harder, but it's definitely a muscle you can make stronger! Whenever things get tough, I always think about how much harder our predecessors had it and what they were able to accomplish. I mean, even just the idea of syncing up two 24 track tape machines gives me bubble guts. You're going to be pumped when you get everything to lock in. Super great to have you here as always! Stoked you're on this path too.

Hey there! There is actually! It's not super perfect, but it can definitely separate out lead vocals from backing vocals. There's a "Vocal Splitter" option in the main menu you can play with and it works with the UVR-MDX-NET model. Hope this helps! Let me know how it goes. Thank you so much for watching!

I know so sorry about that! The work was so good I never thought he'd close up shop. Try this though. You can alternatively email them directly: audioacousticadesign@gmail.com Or this other Etsy panel maker as well! shorturl.at/d2BtU 🚨 Really appreciate you being here and watching!

Totally understand! I wouldn't be afraid to try some of the budget rotary effects. Check out this multi effect on Amazon: shorturl.at/iDnga Thank you so much for watching!

Hey thank you for watching! Sorry to hear about your hum! Where’s it coming from? Are you going to an amp or PA after it?

@@BradDollar you’re welcome. Glad your video showed up on my homepage feed. I’ve never searched TH-cam for info on the pedal so it’s pretty interesting that it was brought to my attention. My signal chain is: 85 strat >pedal>Apogee Element audio interface>Logic on a MAC.

Hey how are you! This is just part 1, as the title says. Check out part 2 for more! It’s linked in the description. Thanks for being here and watching!

There’s a full demo in there for acoustic and electric.

literally says it in the title 😂

Hey Carl! So stoked you're here! That's a great record and is such a wonderful snapshot of who he was becoming. I appreciate you reaching out as well! Stoked to catch up more soon. Thank you for being here!

ill repute so good!

I aim to please. 😂 Great having you here!

😂 glad you got a kick out of it. Thank you for being here and watching!

You sure are! It’s in line with the output. Thank you for stopping by and asking! Appreciate having you here.

Oh you get to try it?! It’s one of my favs for sure.

Thank you! There are no wrong answers and sometimes those clean approaches are the right way. But for the most part, I love working with flavor! Thank you for being here!

You’re so right! That thing is awesome. Appreciate having you here!

Do I ever! reverb.com/shop/techno-empire?query=jerry+finn&showsold=true

Thank you so much for being here and watching! Super glad you like this vid.

I'll put the link in the description too, thank you.

@@BradDollar Ah, I had seen that before but it had 0 listings. Then I figured that I needed to change my settings to "Ships to: Everywhere" because I live outside the US, and everything suddenly appeared! Thanks again for your help

Oh good to know! I didn't realize that. Stoked you found it though!

Great question! I'm just going for little bits, so 1dB usually does it for me. If I'm doing more, and it's not getting any better, then I'll go back into the source tracks and work on them more individually. Thank you for being here and watching!

Appreciate you! Thank you for being here and watching.

Definitely mixing but this way you’re setup for those times when you do need to faux-master something to check levels. The idea here is all about creating a master buss sonic thumbprint, just like if you were to mix something on an analog desk on the real world. And you can always bypass anything in the chain if you don’t want it or it doesn’t work. Thank you for watching!

Hi there! I think your best bet might be something like Izotope RX. You can split files apart with UVR, but it's really hard to take individual elements out of the stems that have already been separated. There are a few free models they have in their download center that might work though (VR Architecture Single Model or MDX MDX23c). It's free so it might be worth a shot. Hope this helps! And thank you a ton for watching!

Thank you for reply fast, I tried both model now and yes it's not remove barking part from already separated vocal

Ah dang! I’ll see if there another model on here. Give iZotope RX10 a shot. You should be able to do it with the free demo. I haven’t gotten rid of dog barks before but I have removed things like piano pedals squeaking and background talking. www.izotope.com/en/products/downloads.html

ok, Let me try with this also. I tried with audo ai web site. They are giving demo example also before and after for dog barking. but not worked with my uploaded audio.

Yea give RX10 a shot. That'll give you the most control anyways.

That’s right! As well as the Beatles and Link Wray, and many other folks.

Great question! You sure can. There's an MDX model in their download center called KuieLab. That you can run on your track to get vocals, drums, bass and guitars/keys. Totally free as well! Thank you so much for watching and being here! Hope this helps.

@@BradDollar Thanks for the info, I'll try it. I have to do a sample solo from a transcription and wanted to use the original track

Oh yea this should definitely work on that.

Were you able to do it with one click? My first tool was StemPlayer but since the crack does not work, I have tried to use one of the songs I have splitted with StemPlayer on Spleeter, AudioLab Spleeter and I have found some faults on them. The seperation quality is not like Stem Player. UVR is a great program but still can not find to seperate them with one click.

@@tromick results were abit mixed so I ended up scratching it. But the mix was very busy and the sax and piano have similar transients

Hey that means a lot! I’m glad you got something out of it and am super excited you got a pair of Barefoots! You’re going to love them. Thank you so much for being here and for watching!

you rule!

My guy! Really appreciate you. Thank you for being here.

Yea Steinberg and Ableton both figured this out a long time ago. I’m just glad PT caught on before it got totally left in the dust 😂. Thank you for watching!

Thank you so much! I’m glad you’re here!

Thank you so much for watching and for the feedback! I’m definitely not forcing it though 😂. I just talk with my hands. That said, much appreciated. Great to have you around!

This means a lot to me, thank you!

😂 I learned from the best.

😂 😂 please don’t ever stop reading again.

Couldn’t do it without you! ❤️

It’s a great one!

I think he'd need a plexi actually

I would LOVE a JCM800 right about now! Thank you for watching!

I’ll take one of those too. Appreciate you being here!

I still am a little shocked 😂. Thanks a ton for watching!

Thanks for watching!

It’s a good one and is for sale! Appreciate you being here and watching.