วีดีโอ

It's not all bad.... You have chocolate, good movies, music, beautiful flowers, scenic nature, and fine dining.

Wow, a kid who looks like the bottom in a gay porn reviews a book about dying by a *dying man* old enough to be his grandfather. Thanks YT algo, I hope my thumbs down means you have to work an extra shift at Wendy's you little f word.

the idiot is the video creator...everything he says he obviously didn't understood what it was about 😂 read more before say something dog

1130

The moment you say its a dark comedy, and since then the way your narration has the grin, i love it i heavily consider this one great tool to increase your dark comedy on murder and on new american shows or whatever like you are given the classic language to explain something so ahead of time

It is like you watched something entirety different to most people. And it WAS really obvious! Thay was part of the intrigue, watching people interact with the killer. Im confused also by what you seem to think about the mother Adora and her actions.

With Ligotti I get exactly the same impression I get with people like Schopenhauer and Nietzsche. You have these very intelligent, very well read guys who are utterly convinced of their intelligence and insight, yet they are also withdrawn, uncharismatic and, quite honestly, not the pretties dolls in the dollhouse, so they have no idea what a pair of female tits feel like in their hands, so... life is meaningless, man.

Ms. Iris Chang not only intended to expose the facts of the Japanese massacre and seek justice for the victims in Nanjing in 1937. What's more, she wanted to arouse readers' reflections on the abuse of power and the evil of mankind. Such atrocities are still happening on a small scale all over the world. Her other works also showed concern for Chinese immigrants in the United States or American prisoners in the Bataan Death March. What she cared about was how we could safeguard the bottom line of humanity.

The premise of this piece is not outdated given the current Gaza Genocide

An abomination. That is what lslam is

Reality hits you when you wake up. This book tells us,how,those who don’t have anything,will cling to anything. My takeaway;we ought to look for good friends than the best of lovers.

It took you more than 6 minutes to go to the book itself! If you had talk more directly, rather than beating around the bush, it would have been easier for the viewers to concentrate.

Be fruitful and multiply was said by the Demiurge. Without slaves being born, the entire matrix would fall apart.

The sub plots are absolutely necessary because it shows how the characters live out their values, and how those values fair in real life. The main ideas can be seen from how the characters fair in their own unique subplots. The discussions are simply a set up for how the characters act in their sub plots. In Crime and Punishment there is one character who's philosophy is discussed and then show in the real world. In Brothers Karamazov, there is 3 if not 4 characters who all have philosophies that need to be examined in the real world, thus there are the sub plots to show how these ideas fair.

Crime and Punishment, as I see it, is a study of a self-centered life vs a God-centered life. One is hell and death, the other is saved life. And it is also the study of a certain type of person who has to follow sin to its ultimate destination in order to have no other place to go but to God. That type of person is under the delusion of self-sufficiency. FYI, the first half of it will induce insane nightmares, while the end of it has the power to restore your faith if you're open to it.

"if only you were him" my bro got played hard...

Currently on my second attempt to read this book. On the first attempt I got about 10% of the way through, and now 25% on my second attempt. I'm glad I've gone back to it but it hasn't really properly hooked me yet

Interesting, i forgot about the role of God in this book

If the version in the video, the Everyman Library edition, was the one you read then I really think you should give the Count of Monte Cristo another go with the Robin Buss translation from Penguin. The Everyman Library edition used a version of the 1846 Chapman-Hall translation and those Victorian editors were notorious for removing things which clashed with their sensibilities. Their version was edited by Peter Washington but as far as i am aware he only edited it to tighten up the language a bit he didn't restore anything in which the Victorian editors had already taken out. I really loved the Count of Monte Cristo and i am actually currently reading it again for a third time and the Robin Buss translation really is the best one. It almost feels like an entirely different book compared to the other versions I've read.

you can prevent the chaos, and let the non existent be eternally blessed by the non existence, by not reproducing

M are so evil

Bundchen of r...apers

- како то - није то питање што ти мислиш о томе или што ви муслимани мислите о томе - него је питање а може ли бог дати тај закон //шта му је да није глуп и да послије стварања свијета Адам Ева //не зна више што је брак и брачна права - то је дечко питање //јер се као и тврди да је ријеч о истом богу - и тада постане Бог нешто зна - а затим постао глуп //та није то само а аиша је ма што - него и Адам Ева те Ева Ева Ева - шта је том таквом лудом богу да више не зна како је стварао свијет _ то је питање - шта се то могло Богу десити да више не зна - а шта ви о томе мислите или што радите //та ето сексају вам се туђа дјеца док своје неби дали а то већ није нормално _ - разумијеш ли питање Бог у некој глупој лажног преправљаној књизи >>>Бибилији<<<< јако добро зна што је брак //то по вама тако је - а у својој задњој књизи >Куран< нема појам више што је брак _ - гдје се то може десити да је то ријеч о истом богу - заглупио Бог и пише глупости о браку //то се само код вас у исламу може десити и то вам добро - док стварност Мухамед никада није чуо никога

17.31min natural law

Comparing it to 50 shades of Grey? Are you serious? Once you start reading, keep a notebook and write characters names down and work out whose narrating. I’m glad you enjoyed the novel eventually.

nice vido more pleas!

World War 2 was a Terrifying time because no one was allowed to be Creative and Do Activities that involved using your own thoughts and Anne Frank in secret Broke That Rule by writing in her Diary all the time whenever she could and That’s Powerful!✊🏻

One of the greatest books written - ever.

They keep trying to square the circle of uniting Jesus & Machiavelli with damage to both worlds which the American founders purposely tried to avoid in the new Republic. They well knew both the good & ill of religion. But today there seem to be many who would forget the mistakes of the past in order to repeat it.

I wonder if Spengler influenced CS Lewis in The Abolition of Man

HELL REALM EARTH SOUL TRAP LOOSH FARM BETTER NOT BE BORNAT ALL

The argument isn’t so much that willingness to die for a belief makes it true, but rather that it increases the odds that one is *sincere* - sincerely mistaken perhaps, but sincere (not lying) nonetheless. I think evangelicals hurt their cause with both excessive commitment to inerrancy (which I’ll grant for the sake of argument when discussing hell*…) and also the trilemma argument (legend, liar, or Lord). Those aside, personally, it seems that the arguments for the historicity of the empty tomb, postmortem “visions,” and the disciples acquiring a belief they were biased *against* appear to be strong. Where does that leave us? That’s for individuals to decide for themselves. * eternal suffering in hell is absurd and false.

Thanks for your review. I was curious of what the book is about. Doesn’t sound like it’s worth reading. I recommend you read: God: The Failed Hypothesis, by Victor Steinger. He explains how the universe and evolution don’t point back to an intelligent designer.

Should have chosen the Buss translation. Translation can make a huge difference this video is another testament to that.

As a Christian I loath Augustine. On the other hand I wonder how much of the Christian world view Catherine understands. So for example the Biblical narrative about pagan gods is that they’re demons. That the whole world is under a demonic influence. So you live in a world where the pagan Roman Empire runs everything, you are persecuted, you look around and see sexual debauchery, human sacrifice, brutal executions, and gladiatorial matches. Then you come to the place where you have enough power you can actually do something about this. What do you do? Are you going to leave demons in control? No! Absolutely not! So you smash idols, you burn books, you trample sexual freedom. This isn’t seen as restricting liberty. Rather everyone is under the bondage of demons. And you are liberating them from demonic forces. Btw as to your point that Homosexuality doesn’t harm anyone, yes it does. All sexual sin is inherently destructive either to the person themselves or to others. I know this personally because my mother’s sexual sins and drug addiction destroyed my family. Real liberty isn’t found in libertinism. Rather it’s found in being free of immorality, in being secure in your person and effects, in healthy nuclear families, and in peace and prosperity. Sin, especially sexual sin, destroys these things. There would be no rape, stds, child molestation, interpersonal conflict over women, and so on, if people didn’t engage in sexual sins. What good is it to indulge in whatever you want if the things you’re indulging in are literally destroying you and those around you? It does no good at all.

He says "dying is immoral" you quoted it "dying is Immortal".

I agree 100%. First part was superb only to become good later on…

1. Muhammad is a paradigm of moral virtue. 2. Muhammad had sexual relations with Aisha when she was 9 years old. You can't hold both. One has got to go. If not then you must hold: 3. Jesus is a paradigm of moral virtue and lived a more virtuous moral life than muhammad And if so... you must also hold: 4. Jesus should be taken more seriously than Muhammad.

My DVD copy of Flight from Death acquired me an intership at the Institute of Noetic Sciences. I just bought another copy of the DVD, and this book as well. Thank you for providing this review.

I find the 'gospels' extremely boring, idiot-placating propaganda.

I’ve been listening to classic novels all year, and this was one I’m so torn about for similar reasons. Like, the grandeur of the story and subplots are incredible, I just wish AD took a little more time making me care about certain subplots or characters a bit more. I get that the subplots paid off in the end, but it just didn’t have that ‘paid off’ feeling for me after.

Studying him now, great vid

I really liked Flynn's writing style. Blunt but poetic captures it very well I think. I feel that she does a good job letting the descriptions and dialog speak for themselves without too much authorial explanations.

Love the demons praise, I have been pushing the agenda!

Solzhenitsyn quoted jews where in charge of the gulag camps

Depending on the mood you are in, sometimes it looks as if all the characters involved in this book's story are celebrating something.

Mentally ill freak

Pajeets crying on a book that has been debunked for its nonsense. The writer is a joke.

9 years old is disgusting! It sounds stupid trying to make a case for it....

I think this book is an attempt to reach the permanent, enduring part of us. The part of us that reason and logic cannot reach, but that beauty and love can. And if you read it thinking you'll understand it logically/rationally, it cannot have a satisfying ending. But I think for those who are searching for whether or not we have some spark of divinity, and believe that we do, I think the book is more satisfying. And read through that lens, the book is quite remarkable.