วีดีโอ

@@dinggamulas2418 it’s a great interface for sure! 👍 one of the best preamps I’ve heard.

@@homestudioacademy okay sir thank you for advice me ❤️

@@dinggamulas2418 I have many recommendations here on the channel. Here is my latest video on how to build a home studio: th-cam.com/video/5tUBwXlIMpM/w-d-xo.html My favorite budget interfaces: Audient iD14: th-cam.com/video/Y6XKhwhOeTo/w-d-xo.html Lewitt Connect 2 and Connect 6: th-cam.com/video/GiAgJt9_SAM/w-d-xo.html Hope it helps! 😊

@@homestudioacademy thank you for replying sir, bigenners to make small home studio but very high price matrials my dream to make small studio

@@dinggamulas2418 you’re welcome, glad to help

@@billysilverio9336 thanks for sharing your thoughts! I’ve never recorded with a TLM103, have you?

​@@homestudioacademyyes. All the time.

@@victoradeniji4554 glad to help! 😊

@@exhaust4246 you don’t need a Fethead because the SM7DB has a built in booster.

@@homestudioacademy will it improve the sound quality or noise floor?

@@exhaust4246 doesn’t impact sound quality at all. It will act exactly like a cloudlifter/fethead resulting in much less hiss than cranking up your preamp on your interface. To be honest, one of the best investments I’ve made here for the channel.

@@homestudioacademy so do you suggest just get a sm7b and save $200? Cause I already have a cloudlifter

@@exhaust4246 if you already have a cloudlifter, then yes, save your money and go with the standard SM7B

@@zerogravitasyoga you’re welcome. This is a pretty old video though. Here is a full mixing tutorial on the Rode NT1: th-cam.com/video/9QZt6IDN0PE/w-d-xo.html

@@HarvinderSingh-yy8th thanks for sharing your thoughts 😊

@@tubeo94 yes, it has DSP powered plugins which plays a big part in what makes the Apollo expensive. However, nowadays, I’ve been fortunate to test other interfaces like the Lewitt Connect 2 and Connect 6 which also come with DSP powered plugins for a fraction of the price. But of course, it’s not the same as having an 1176, LA2A, Pultec EQ, Marshall Plexi etc…

@@Bijo506 you’re very welcome glad to help 😊

@@Bijo506 hey Bijo, thanks for the insightful comment. When it comes to music production (singing and recording instruments), I prefer the 440 pure because of its brighter sound. When it comes to voiceover work, I prefer the NT1 4th gen because of its more neutral sound. Keep in mind that both are condenser microphones and therefore will be sensitive to background noise. Not a problem though because I also don’t have an acoustically treated room and still create TH-cam content and work on music production. Here is a tutorial which I think might help you get best results from these mics: th-cam.com/video/L7KYjQBIH-w/w-d-xo.html and here is a plugin to remove room noise: th-cam.com/video/U4Xayicbfz0/w-d-xo.html Hope it helps! 😊

@@homestudioacademy Thanks for your time and updates!! I will share the review in this thread itself, once I bought the same.

@@Bijo506 glad to help! Thanks for supporting the channel 😊

@@billysilverio9336 it depends. For spoken word, I still prefer the NT1 4th generation because it has a more neutral response which I prefer for my particular voice. However, for music production/ recording instruments, I prefer the Neumann. Both great mics but I think comes down to personal taste and budget.

@@studio_person For the past 2 years here on the channel I’ve done quite a few reviews. Mics: Neumann TLM102, Rode NT1 4th Gen, Rode NT1 5th Gen, Rode Signature Series, Aston Origin, Lewitt LCT240 Pro, LCT 440 Pure, LEWITT Pure Tube, Lewitt Ray, Shure SM7DB… Interfaces: Apollo Twin X, EVO4, Audient iD14, iD24, Lewitt Connect 2 and Connect 6.. Takes a lot of time and money to make these videos. Thankfully, some of these companies have been kind enough to send me gear to review. At the end of the day, I will only review products that I have used and/or recommend to my audience.

@@bloodxx300 there is not a “one setting fits all” kind of of thing. It will depend on the track you’re working on. Use your best judgement and do what you think sounds good for your project.

@@zaeembhatti8148 comes down to personal preference. I prefer the 4th generation for spoken word vocals because of its more neutral response and prefer the signature series to record acoustic instruments because of its brighter sound.

@@DeadliestEvil since I’ve made this video, there are other audio interfaces that include DSP powered plugins and are much more affordable that I really like, like the LEWITT Connect 2 and Connect 6. Here is my review of them: th-cam.com/video/GiAgJt9_SAM/w-d-xo.html

@@preetivipin178 I recommend quite a few interfaces. What are you planning to record (music production? Voiceover? Live-streaming? And what is your budget?

@@homestudioacademy singing purpose on application star maker smule

@@homestudioacademy can u suggest me audio interface which can I use with mobile also for singing purpose

@@preetivipin178 if you need an audio interface with a mobile connection, then check out the Lewitt Connect 6: th-cam.com/video/sG5_qyZfMaw/w-d-xo.html

Yes because 32ohm is low impedance

@@billysilverio9336 it’s a great mic for sure! 👍

@@dnasty5714 I use Logic Pro

@@wayneholmes637 i did notice that the 240 had a much higher self noise than the 440 pure, it is very apparent when listening in headphones.

@@priyanshuprakash290 the new* Scarlett solo 4th generation has up to 68db of gain which is enough to power a SM7B without a cloudlifer. However, I’m not sure about older models.

@@priyanshuprakash290 yes it can be used for singing/rap but to be honest, for music production I prefer to use condenser microphones.

@@kelvinwilkins8406 I used this plugin for many years but now I actually switched to the Masterplan by MusikHack. Here is the full tutorial on it: th-cam.com/video/gx9r1wDlKIk/w-d-xo.html

@@tabdanger510 retail prices constantly change on Amazon

@@akg.69 both great mics! From the comparison videos I’ve watched, the TLM103 has a much brighter sound than the TLM102 so it depends on your tone preference. My suggestion is to hear them side by side and decide for yourself.

@@homestudioacademy Thank you!

@@dashark1988 thanks for sharing your experience using the Apollo

@@Daniel_Antonio_Arellano782 I head a test comparison from Podcastage and I agree. I also prefer the newer models compared to the original

For vocals, after mixing it won't make a difference

@@realprodpreston thanks for sharing your thoughts 😊 I’ve watched quite a few comparison videos between the TLM102 and the TLM103 and at the end of the day, in my opinion, it comes down to people’s budget and sound preference. The TLM103 does have lower self noise and it is the “industry standard” for voiceover for example but it costs more and it is a much brighter mic. So for people with already very bright voices and a lot of sibilance, the TLM102 may be a better option.

@@hawaiiantime6596 both great mics for sure 👍

Glad to help 😊

I don't mean that as an insult, Kermit is really cool.

Glad you liked the video 😊

@@stevem-h3562 thanks for sharing your experience using the mic 😊