วีดีโอ

A load a fancy talk about something that sounds good to regulatory bodies and websites but in practice is pointless. I was on a section 3 and the only thing I qualified for was a small non-means tested benefit to pay for the medications that should have been paid for by my local authority, received no direct payments to cover travel costs to go to appointments, no social housing, no council tax reductions or exemptions. I kept asking about monies still owed to me with the council tax I paid for in hospital but always got the subject changed. Even to the point were I mentioned it so the local mental health team turned up at my house to threaten to section me again but decided everything okay but wanted to see me the following week, I turned up and was told they were on holiday. So paid for my own expenses and lost a days pay at work, complained through an advocate which took 6 months and got an insulting reply. I got discharged from there services but at a GP annual health check put me on more non related medications which put me into negative gain and was paying for things on my credit card. A couple of years later when I failed in my re-application for the non-means benefit, I contacted services but they weren't interested in helping, so I told my GP i'm better off without medication then, but it turns out s117 is really only used to gain access to ones medical records through the Summary Care Record. I recently worked out over the years on a calculation with everything totalled up I should have been £70,000 of benefits or allowances better off. Nothing will change whilst fancy talk is used to justify peoples high value jobs as their own priority.

Please discharge me tommorw to my old bungalowe where used to live before

Can you please answer this question ... if someone is already living in the community in enhanced supported living and on s.117 aftercare and the ICB are wanting to create a "step down one month trial for the person in their own home" and the person has to continue to pay their utility bills at the enhanced supported living placement whilst doing the "step down trial" should the ICB be responsible for paying for the utilities at the "step down home" during the one month trial period?

Bristol city fell into the hands of talentless architect's and corrupt planners since the war. Big contractor's fill their pockets parasiting Bristol and I'm sure those in planning benefit from it financially, otherwise we might have had a truly loved and beautiful city, and that could only have happened if we had been determined to employ respectful architect's with talent. There are small pocket's of Bristol with a hint of it's ancient Soul we can still proudly point tourist's to, aplogising when overshadowed by tower's of a growing concete jungle and swathes of tarmac, potholes, and badly laid pavement's. George Ferguson you were at least that much better than the present day Mayor. Sadly the city has been taken by woke ideologies and this mental illness may never be cured.

It was absolutely rubbish thstvi was discharged from the mental health team in an fircified discharge when wasn't ready for an discharge

Can they lawfully discharge me on a 117 act since discharge have gone down hill and mental health deteriated to an severe mental health crises

I was discharged from the mental health team in a 117. Why's that

Thanks

all white people eh

If you'd like research of my case of seriousness of in these matters of overwhelming complicaties and fiendishly, of great importance and interest, where by I am the crux and carrier the burden to this subject. Please help me for which you are much more well placed to argue such issues. I'm totally happy to help. Thanks.

What do you think of Nicola Bulley?

An excellent webinar. Thank you for preparing and presenting this information. It astounds me that more leaseholders do not watch and comment on these presentations - they are invaluable to those going through the FTT process with the latest aspects of the BSA being part of the claims being determined.

The Bill of rights is primary legislation

Very informative as always, greatly appreciated.

Promo SM

I’m Charlie Cory wrights son

So what about hotels? Are hotels subject to this Act?

All acts and statutes created since ist January 1973 when Queen was deposed are void and Tony Blaire,the very man liable to be hung for treason could not ,as he purports do away with Treason Act .both mental health acts and capacity acts are void,the sections within will not protect wrongdoers.

criminals,what they are doing is assault. and acting in treason.All courts were dissolved in 2008 under the clearfield Doctrine,also in 2008 The highest judge in Uk gave speech to legal professionals that all courts are administration courts with no legitimacy and no act can be passed to legitimize them. there you have it Court Of Protection is a fraud on peoples rights

Aside from statutory litigation (i.e. for example, patent validity and Companies Act 2006 actions), post Brexit I see no advantage in litigating commercial matters in the English courts for the vast majority of cases when arbitration is an alternative route and for example in Amsterdam, English is allowed as the language in any subsequent appeal from arbitrations there. Further to the point, Part 8 actions rely on Witness statements only. Just talking about money-no-object Part 7 actions is fine, but you've made no observations regarding Part 8, where I believe §8.4 of the Chancery guide is clear but often ignored. In Part 8 not only is there often narrative but also argument. The Part 8 witness statement can become an unmitigated dumping ground. And Part 8 trials often don't disclose arguments until the day before the trial itself when skeleton arguments are disclosed often for the first time. It's outrageous. This is a vast abuse of due process because it should be sequential, just as it is in the US, whereby the plaintiff prepares his brief first and then the defendant 30 days later. It is not for the defendant to have to second guess the legal basis of the arguments being advanced by a plaintiff. This is why English courts are, for commercial work, not only *not* fit for purpose, but incapable of dispensing what due process really means. In arbitration, Parties can agree procedure and not get barracked by a judge worried about court time!

Dear Mr. Broach, Thank you for making this discussion available on TH-cam. I had my printed copy of the Bill of Rights at hand as I watched and have a couple of pages of notes. My particular interest in the bill is Clause 4, Freedom of Speech. I am native British citizen, born/grew up in London. I also lived in the US for over 30 years. Over the duration I came to take for granted the rights afforded citizens through the country's legal and constitutional environment. Upon returning to the UK in 2017, I suffered culture shock as to what passes as free speech. The vaunted 1st Amendment in the US Bill of Rights was ratified in 1791. Over the intervening 230 years, successive generations of Americans naturally accept through their "cultural DNA" and jurisprudence a very extensive right of expression. Section 4 of this bill seems to me that the UK is catching up with history. I hope it will be enacted and the section interpreted in favor of greater freedom of expression. Thanks to all your contributors. 4 (1) When determining a question which has arisen in connection with the right to freedom of speech, a court *must give great weight to the importance of protecting the right.*

53:16 great question about damage and tort law

23:16 damages

Starts at 4:30

The Earth is cooler with the atmos/GHGs/albedo not warmer. To perform as advertised the GHGs require “extra” energy upwelling from the surface radiating as a black body. The kinetic heat transfer processes of the contiguous atmos molecules render that scenario impossible. No greenhouse effect, no GHG warming, no man/CO2 driven climate change or Gorebal warming. Version 1.0 031722

Where can I see the part 1 of this webinar? Thanks!

Begins at 5:50

Very interesting and clear, thanks for sharing.

1) By reflecting away 30% of ISR the albedo, which would not exist w/o the atmosphere, makes the earth cooler than it would be without the atmosphere like that reflective panel set on the dash. Remove the atmosphere/GHGs and the earth becomes much like the moon, a barren rock with a 0.1 albedo, 20% more kJ/h, hot^3 on the lit side, cold^3 on the dark. Nikolov, Kramm (U of AK) and UCLA Diviner mission all tacitly agree. 2) the GHG up/down welling, “trapping”/”back” radiating/delaying/intercepting, 100 % efficient, perpetual warming loop requires "extra" energy which according to RGHE theory it gets from 3) the terrestrial surface radiating that "extra" energy as a near ideal .95 emissivity black body which 4) it cannot do because of the non-radiative heat transfer processes of the contiguous atmospheric molecules. 1+2+3+4 = 0 Greenhouse Effect + 0 Greenhouse gas warming + 0 man caused climate change. All science backed up by experiment, the gold standard of classical science. www.linkedin.com/posts/nicholas-schroeder-55934820_climatechange-greenhouse-co2-activity-6749812735246254080-bc6K