วีดีโอ

This is the printer I was waiting for. I've been rocking two MK2.5s for years now and I have been dreaming with this machine for a long time. I don't like bambu, don't know why, support perhaps?

I think this might be still a good printer to choose. Not everyone needs to print fast, they want the print to be done and have the quality they need. Some people don't want to modify it, so half-open source will not bother them, however, ability to fix the printer yourself is way better option than overpaying for spare parts. It cracks me up a bit seeing people using mostly 5-15% of the print volume the printer is actually capable of, so the size isn't a deal breaker too. I think it's a perfect choice to people who just want to print, can fix it on their own, and if they really want to, upgrade it in the future and still have reliable device.

Is this serious?

An easy way to paste in the terminal is just to click the middle mouse key. For copying, it is sufficient to just mark the text to be pasted (with the left mouse key). Not yet into video editing:)

I pre ordered one already

Over the last month I started using a pc that runs Ubuntu for openfoam simulations. I love ubuntu. I love the fact that it is not doing as much stuff in the background. It doesnt automatically install hp shit. It doesnt automatically come with shit like "amazon" or "facebook" that slow your pc down and you cant remove in a normal manner. I am done. I am buying extra storage for my laptop and Im gonna install ubuntu on it. I am keeping windows for adobe and some rendering stuff that doesnt run on ubuntu only. Itll take a while to get fully used to the terminal and shit, but if I see how fast some people are with it, I think even that is a win.

Creality? Hahahahaha! Are they even still in business?

Dude they explained why the camera isn't included. just look at the website.

Do we HAVE TO call it "Nabu" or can we rename it?

I bought a Bambu. Still like my Prusa. I think what you’re missing is that we can fix our printer. I can not fix the known problems with bambu. Prusa last so much longer. Also my bambu may have a bigger bed but it won’t let me print the whole bed because it does all these checks. I would do prusa hands down. There is instructions and a manual for everything. Bambu frustrates me with not instructions.

ANOTHER BIG FAILURE FOR PRUSA WAY OVER PRICED SMH

Not everyone wants a huge printer. Get an XL.

It's a good incremental upgrade. I think people and Prusa fans just wish this came out 2 years earlier after the MK3 series rather than in response to the rest of the market. I bought an MK4 a year ago and wish I had this machine instead. Not enough to upgrade it though.

I operate two MK4, XL 5T and HT90 at work - and in a long term, the higher price is justified. You can repair everything - no need to buy whole modules, we dont worry about our prototypes being transfered via cloud to some sweatshop - and dont forget the PrusaSlicer which is "free" for everyone. It is by far the best (and I tried probably most of slicers). Its fast, intuitive, open ... if You want to torture Yourselves try Phrozen DS slicer (thats the worst i worked with) :D Development and improvements to PrusaSlicer also cost a lot of money - which is "paid" by slightly higher prices of the printers. But with Core ONE - i think that price point is much better than for older printer. Now I dont see a reason why would I buy MK4S kit compared to Core ONE kit. So - no revolution, but reasonable evolution.

t the end of the day you are either happy supporting chinese companies with cheap products that are out of date after 6 months, or you actually appreciate companies that pay living wages, made in EU and offer incredible support and backwards compatibility. Me after printing for 14 years and never buying a printer always just building my own the prusa core one will be the first i buy.

If I were setting up a small print farm, my money would be with PRUSA. The Bambu P1S I have has been great, but I am very worried when this thing breaks down. The Bambu tech support has a less than stellar reputation. I wouldn't think twice if I were buying 10+ printers. The PRUSA's would be rock solid with minimal downtime. That's all money...

Bambu Lab's proprietary grasp they have on customers is such a turn off. I'll take a smaller build volume and being able to choose my own camera over getting sucked into a propriety printer platform. With Prusa being open source, the community and grow and upgrade it; and you'll have the choice to upgrade to those features or not. Also, Prusa needs to be rewarded for rebelling against the planned obsolescence norms with what they did with backwards compatibility.

The GPIO, filter, and camera should be included. The idea that nobody needs a camera is ludicrous. If a print fails, it’s helpful to know when and why that failure occurred, and you cannot always discern this from the spaghetti mess that comes out. The build volume is a huge disappointment. If they had just stretched it to 350 cubed, they’d have a hot seller on their hands despite the price. They *need to* find a cutoff point for MK1->MK4S->Core One upgrades or they’ll be locked into this build volume forever, becoming continually less competitive every time.

Prusa Core One tends to suggest that enclosed CoreXY is a superior option to a bedslinger. I tend to agree, but, given a BambuLab P1S is less than half the price and prints like a boss then it seems like a no brainer to me that it is a better choice. Given we know there is something new coming from BambuLab in the new year then it looks to me that Prusa are again rushing out the announcement of the Core One - it doesn't ship until January.......

You didnt watch the video you can print the entire bed. 250x250 is plenty.

Dont buy a Prusa if you want something that is value for money. Made in EU is not going to be cheap.

I use my MK3 to build things for my other hobbies and I will always support a U.S. or EU based company over anything in China. In addition, the support alone is worth the extra cost. As for the extras, many of us don’t need them. Why buy and have all the extra failure points if they aren’t needed? I’d much rather have a basic and very reliable machine that I can add extras to if needed.

Can you tell me more about the coil you use there? because I am also building this annealer.

100% agree with you, no camera, no filters and no acelerometer, no LIDAR, no AI spaghetti detection... it is overpriced.

Very decent take, however one can't always make prusa fans happy

Ok, sorry to ask, but what is the big deal about a camera? I've been beating the hell out of my MK4 (now MK4S) for a couple of years now and I've never had any need to monitor it. I hit print, it prints, end of story. I think it messes up 1 out of a100 prints and that's usually attributed to me not slicing a model correctly. So for me personally, I couldn't give a crap about the camera. Also, having a MK4S, I can now upgrade to the Core One far cheaper than it would be to buy a lot of enclosed printers. I'm very happy they went in the direction they did, because it'll save me money and allow me to keep a lot of what made my MK4 bulletproof. Call me a Prusa fanboy if you want, but I see little reason to abandon ship any time soon. I've been happy with my printer since day 1, and it gives me far less grief than my friends who went with other options. Bambu may be the Ferrari of printers, but I'll happily drive around in my low maintenance, highly reliable Toyota Corolla.

The it department will have less issues with Prusa.

i use arch and i only break something every few weeks

The printer is fine. What is it what you are actually doing with a camera...you are checking if your print failed! Besides from making time lapses a build in camera is a testament for low print success rate. To monitor your hardware with a camera is a sign of low confidence in the hardware and printing process. Imagine a printer so good and reliable it doesn't need a camera to check on it. ;)

If you buy the printer that says "AI cameras" on the box, then I ultimately don't understand your priorities. Prusa has always been the best choice imo, as they know to keep unnecessary complexity out. I don't want them to push the price down, because that inevitably will destroy quality/reliability, which is the only real consideration. 12000+ Euro down on filaments only, and the price difference of a few hounded per printer becomes irrelevant. Repairability, parts availability and documentation is way more important. They could double their price and still be relevant, imo.

K1c all the way the rest is nice colors and names

Commie printers made to undercut our industries with stolen tech and fund weapons for authoritarian regimes to maintain their dystopian police state.... or printers made by freedom loving Europeans who understand working rights and don't have the modern day stasi involved in every major company allowing people to function separate from politics and the state. Choice is clear for me after what they did to Hong Kong. I spend more on a lot of things but I avoid as much as I can... not even hard with so much stuff being made in other countries now.

There will release a 270X270X270 core one S version next year. Just add a 9 XL tiles and decrease the dentition on left and right (which a steel sheet which can be done easly).

A big plus for any Prusa is that you can replace parts / repair it yourself. Otherwise i would say too little too late and i really need more volume / a bigger printbed for my projects. So instead of this, overdue prusa corexy version, i will probably buy a RatriG V4 500cm2 with 2 printheads (IDEX Upgrade).

- BULTD VoLUME ToOO SmaAL About half is focused on the build volume, which is not too small. Most things you print will fit within it, and if you need something bigger than this can print you probably should not be using a 3D printer for it. - nO NeW FeAtRureSS Can we stop with this soycuck take? Educate yourself on the word refinement. Not everything needs feature bloat to justify itself as a new release. What does this printer lack, that would prevent you from using it as it is intended to be used? Ai CmERaAS? Really dude, stop crying about cameras being optional - like not having one puts the brakes on print jobs. They are "nice to have" but far from required. And filters are only needed if you are printing smelly plastics with noxious fumes - in which case having a duct that directs it out the window would be more useful. Just 3D-print the window insert for the duct to attach to. - CoST TOO HiGh Because it doesn't come with bloated features, the price is too high...but aren't these printers known for reliable and consistent quality? The chinese counterparts are not putting out top notch quality at or near their top speeds. Being able to buy it as a kit for $950 then choose whatever parts you want after-market is a solid deal. For less than $1,500 total you can have it exactly the way you want it.

Completely agree. This was my reaction as well. Just more disappointment from Prusa. Coming from an ex Prusa fan boy, it hurts to see them release 3 year old "inovations"... again.

As usual with Prusa the price is absurd, for me here in Australia to get one to my door is over $2400. I can get a Bambu Labs X1C for that with an ams which is a far better printer and still have change to buy a Bambu Labs A1 combo which on its own is better than this printer lol.

I used factor for 2 years and just switched to Cookunity and so far I am glad I made the switch. Factor started being stingy and only offering salmon as an expensive upgrade. Factor also doesn't have a pescatarian option so for months all I could get was shrimp and vegetarian dishes. It got boring quick.

Lol, comparing a Prusa or Bambu against a Creality is like comparing a Nissan to an Audi. Sure, they are both cars but no one would argue there is a substantial leap in quality if you pay more.

Such a stats comparison is the dumbest thing ever to do. Creality printers are just trash no matter how nice the stats sound on paper.

Factor portion size isn't large

I think Bambu and Prusa are pretty clear where they differ. Prusa is Higher quality, repairability, upgradability, security and support at the cost of a higher price. Bambu is offering an all in one solution that is also high quality and a competitive price. They lack support, security and you can forget about upgrading without buying a new machine. It's up to the customer to decide what they value in that dynamic. I can understand either choice. I do have to disagree with your assessment of the MMU. Have you ever used one? I think it is perfectly capable, I've been printing multicolor and it has worked perfectly for me. I like that you get 5 colors instead of 4. And it produces a lot less waste then Bambu's system because it does not cut the filament. No poop, just a wipe tower.

I'll stick with the Prusa

About 2 minutes 30 seconds in you speculate why Prusa is using parts from the MK4 for the core. I think there is another consideration. I worked in New Product Development and what I think happened is they have an engineering team that is making incremental improvements to their design. I have been with design teams where we get a new head of engineering and he takes us down an entirely new path and we always end up behind schedule, over budget and with a buggy system. I always argue for taking the existing design and improving it for the next generation. Since Prusa is probably the head engineer he is probably the reason for the consistent improvements. I think they made the right choice. Having an MK4 upgrade is just a cherry on top.

if this thing can get multi print heads like xl.. im sold, if not hard pass

If the proposed tariffs of 60%-100% on Chinese goods and a 10%-20% tax on imports are applied, the price of the Bambu Lab X1 Carbon could rise significantly. For example, the base price of $1,199 could increase by $719 to $1,199 with the tariffs, bringing the price to $1,918 to $2,398. Adding a 10%-20% tax would further increase it by $120 to $240, potentially making the final price anywhere from $2,038 to $3,438. This cost hike would be passed on to consumers

I can’t help but giggle when you talk about it going toe to toe with bamboo. Have you ever used a Prusa? Straight out of the box, dimensional accuracy, and I’m not just talking about accuracy within itself printing one of those little stupid clearance test. We’re talking about dimensional, accuracy, and engineering parts that fit on something else out in the real world. I’ve never had a Prusa printer that couldn’t print some thing and just using the default profile for the correct filament nails the measurements the P1 P printer I had besides horrible layer lines and awful overhangs, and probably the worst seams I’ve seen in the industry could never nail dimensional, accuracy and has to be tweaked endlessly to get parts to fit.

I'd be interested to see MK4 sales vs. Prusa's predictions. Because the same things were said when that was released 18 months ago. According to some commentators they shouldn't even still be in business to be able to produce a CORE One :D (Instead, they grew the company even larger from then until now). Obviously an EU manufactured printer with bundled 24/7 live support is never going to compete cost wise with anything coming from China.

350X350 is way too large, wasting material, space, electricity, time to preheat , cost, and much more. 250X250 to 280X280 is just about right.

I’ve dealt with bamboo customer service and Prusa customer service and based on those two experiences alone, Prusa is by far the better choice. And my particular instance was such a nightmare, at six months of back-and-forth and eventually filing a chargeback and getting my money refunded that I would never purchase another bamboo product. I hope tariffs destroy their company. ;)