วีดีโอ

In '94 I was a student at Clinch Valley College..an affiliate of U.V.A. enrolled in Biology 101. I loved the subject. I spoke with my professor and told him that I felt that microtubules played an enormous role in human consciousness. He looked at me as though I had 3 heads. So grateful for your research and following through with what I had intuited. Have often wished that I has continued in the field.

👍👍

I can answer that: microtubules having nothing to do with consciousness because consciousness is not a physical process, it exists outside of space, time and matter. Self awareness (consciousness) is externality. You can see yourself outside of yourself. This can not happen in a physical, mechanistic process.

When you run out of Azomite there is basalt. We should have plenty of fusion energy by then to grind it. It is doubtful whether you would ever run out of basalt.

Snake oil

According to Sir Dr Koch, is consciousness a fundamental property or state of matter?

The full weight of reality as it is, hit me last night. It’s… destabilising but I’m starting to adapt already. I did get a bit of an existential crisis, reality became a little.. ill-defined. I managed to ground myself and all was well, and it turned into something that maps onto claims of enlightenment. It’s quite a lot to take in, nothing is like we thought it was, and it’s something that can only be discovered, not told. Our 3D space time intuitions are simply too strong.

11:30 Soil minerals deplete with every harvest, as it is absorbed by the plant, and it is necessary to replenish those soil minerals. That is a key idea that has been at the back of my mind when buying tomatoes to cook with. When I buy the cheap tomato, it looks less red, and has almost no aroma. The cheap tomato was probably grown in depleted soil, or inadequate hydroponic nutrient solution concentration.

Why do nearly all physicists disagree with Hameroff and Penrose's theory?

Around 50:40: Did I catch this right? Basically the process of realisation of "cosnsciousness" consumes no ATP in the OR-theory ?? :O

My understanding is that volcanic ash can contain high levels of heavy metals vs elemite which also contains 66 plus minerals including the micro elements. True or false?

Consciousness is Planck's frequency of superfluid timeless quantum space.

Are black holes portals of scale that create consciousness which is synonymous with dark matter by compressing matter from our world to a quantum state using the reciprocation of Benford's law?

Consciousness is nothing more than a frequency transmitted from the prime source through the material world. All material things are consciousness. Including the anaesthetic itself that is used to rendered consciousness unconscious is conscious. Therefore consciousness exists before all things. So life was born from consciousness. Life could not give birth to consciousness.

Quantum information, Quantum entanglement, Are, fundamental, underlying of Reality. Quantum Mind emerge.. Collection, Pattern of QuInfo and QuEntang. Quantum Body emerge.. Std.Model emerge,DNA, Protein synthesis. Mind and Body entanglement.. Consciousness emerge. Spacetime emerge.. Mass.. Energy.. Wave fn Decoherence. Mathematics Emerge.. Intrinsic in the fabric of the emergence. Holographic principal..information Conservation, Energy conservation.

This concept that our consciousness is; Reduction of the waveform at a microtubular level (particularly in the cerebrum), near the speed of light, which is then interpretted by our biological logical processing unit (cerebellum) which then deliveries hormones accordingly to readjust physical action in our perceived moment of now, is absolutely wonderful. To expand; Sensory receptors: In response to external stimuli, sensory receptors in various parts of the body (such as the eyes, ears, skin, etc.) detect the stimuli and convert them into electrical signals. Neural pathways: The electrical signals generated by the sensory receptors travel through neural pathways, which consist of interconnected neurons. These pathways carry the signals towards the brain for further processing. The cerebrum: The cerebrum is responsible for higher cognitive functions such as perception, thinking, and decision-making. When the electrical signals reach the cerebrum, they undergo complex processing at a microtubular level. This processing involves the interpretation and analysis of the waveform, which represents the sensory information. Interpretation: The cerebrum interprets the waveform and generates a symbolic representation of the perceived sensory information. This interpretation depends on previous knowledge, experiences, and the individual's cognitive processes. Cerebellum and hormonal response: The cerebellum, often referred to as the "biological logical processing unit," receives the symbolic representation generated by the cerebrum. It then integrates this information with other sensory inputs and previously learned motor patterns to facilitate coordinated physical actions. Simultaneously, the cerebellum can influence hormonal responses through its connections with other brain regions, including the hypothalamus. The release of hormones allows for adjustments in various physiological and behavioral aspects, helping to adapt to the perceived moment of "now." This combination of physics, biology and chemistry disciplines is truly, deeply fascinating to me.

It's interesting that platonic values has a spiritual effect in all of us. A sense of divine order. 🙏 c]8-)

Is anyone else thinking that neurons are quantum logic gates?

Awesome. I’d offer one idea, proto-consciousness’s idea of pleasure would be much different than a complex agent. I’d offer that at the most simplest boot-up phase… the only operation that would be interesting or desired would be “more consciousness” and calling that pleasure seeking seems not quite on the mark. Meaning the drive to complexity is driven by the desire for more complex experiences, not just “pleasure”.

With all due respect, much objectively, that woman is interrupting a very interesting talk because she has “NO understanding of quantum physics AT ALL’, she says…What is justifying her presence then? It only slows the pace. The whole point of this video is about the quantum nature of consciousness so do you part girl and read about S.Hameroff studies PRIOR to making a video. Some people are too lazy to do the work at home to then bother experts with elementary questions. One has to be prepared for a ITW. That is disrespectful. Study your topic before engaging otherwise stay offline, at least for this one.

Which also asks, are the #kinetochrones the chief architects of protein consciousness 🤓

Hameroff & Penrose have NO CLUE - they are holding on to a religious idea of "consciousness and soul" without any evidence at all - not an iota.

Very interesting, thanks a lot for uploading.

I believe microtubules are involved because my brains ability to repeat old imagination I didnt realize I was creating at the time but generated when I was young. I recall the imagination almost perfectly, my theory its arrangement of microtubules thats responsible for visual imagination and memory.

th-cam.com/video/RiMvi897ICc/w-d-xo.html In this video, we unravel the theoretical foundations of Orch OR, dive into the quantum processes taking place in our brain's microtubules, and explore how this theory addresses the enigmatic nature of consciousness. We'll also discuss recent experiments shedding light on the quantum mysteries within our brains.

All is gravity ,that's all I can fathom.

32:00 "Consciousness precedes life." This is narrative, this is philosophy lost within our own, self-absorbed and self-certain minds. The stuff of narrative tactics, not the exposition of constructive step by step facts that lead to better understanding. Consciousness is an interaction between creatures & environments & each other. Consciousness is about awareness and it's on a spectrum - but, I never hear Hameroff really acknowledge that side of it, or evolution's role in creating creature consciousness. Ignoring that cripples this entire enterprise. These lines of argument are more appropriate for the Descartes school of thought - than post Evolution evidence based scientific understanding.

It would be interesting to hear Rajnish interview Bernardo Kastrup. Another interesting guest might be plant biologist and philosopher Rolf Sattler. I took one of his classes a long time ago; he has some divergent views on a few topics.

So photo- consciousness may be infinite and is self-aware (33:45ish, Dr. Hameroff)? Excellent program. How might NDEs relate? I've had microtubules fever for years after coming up on some of Dr. Hameroff 's papers regarding effects of anesthesia as possibly related to what occurs during NDEs, or near death experiences.Thank you.

It would be interesting to hear an evidence-based discussion of electroculture. Ashley of the Gardening in Canada channel had a very nice video on the topic, but I have as yet to find someone who actually practices electroculture who also seems grounded in evidence (pun intended).

Fascinating stuff about microtubules and their role in consciousness. But for me the Chopra style pseudo religious stuff is for the birds.

You should have so many more views

Subbed, notifications on….💛

80-20 is ridiculous 😮any updates on that?

Podrían activar sub títulos en español, gracias.

I wonder how brewers grains would compare? We’ve been using malted barley, and dextrose malt extract for years

This is bollocks. Doesn't nothing to inform or enlighten. Just wheel-spinning and word salad.

It's very strange how these tools have ENORMOUS potential and are some of the most important tools ever developed, and yet they receive very little public attention. So strange - and so predictable. The positivity about the future is refreshing, however, considering all the doomsaying of the last few years around AI and how it will inevitably destroy us etc. The advance of AI has enabled this progress. That negativity is exhausting, and it is large part fuelled by a total ignorance of the vast human capacity to change for the better, nevermind enlightenment, and the potential of technology to really, really help us in this area.

I like the theory, but I see one issue with it though. Almost all cells have Microtubules and there is very little difference from a neuron to any other cell. If Microtubules were the source of consciousness then there should be a change in consciousness for an amputee. You would think if Microtubules were the process in which consciousness is formed, any loss or disruption to the network, not just the brain. I think it's valid the observations of computation through Microtubules, I just don't see how the leap to consciousness from this is valid. Also, what is the benefit of consciousness to survival? That kind of goes against the parsimony rules of nature, if we removed the experience aspect of our existence, we would function the same, maybe even better which is argued by some. Also as a engineer for over 25 years, there is no such thing as Random, not only have I never found anything random, if you ever tried to create a random number generator by either software or hardware, it is impossible to create one, it might look random, but at some point it has to be seeded on something non random, even in the case of a quantum number generator. Fact is our math is pretty poor, when you get to quantum physics, it's all based on probability fields, they look like random fields of probability but that's just because our math doesn't work. Classical physics can't be used past ten to the negative 33 seconds, but there is clearly something beyond though, quantum physics looks at probabilities, neither actually describe anything real, all just concepts that I can take us pretty far but then ceases to work. I think quantum physics is a field these days that is saturated with egos, if your whole field is based solely on probabilities, all you did was create a net to catch some of the properties flowing out of it. Kinda of crazy to cement a discipline in which only describes possibilities and to explain the missing parts, they came up with an even worse theory of the Multiverse to fill in the blanks. If you say everything that you can't find in quantum physics is because every infinitesimal second, an infinite number of universes spawn into existence for all possibilities and those are where the hidden variables are, to me is not only lazy, coherently makes no sense since there is zero empirical evidence to a hint that a multiverse is even a thing. We need new blood, the old guards have stagnated with theories that explain nothing, but if your able to describe one single aspect of reality with a theory, they fill in the blanks with more of the same nonsense from colleagues.

Wow - brilliant minds. I’m dumbfounded.

Dear Sir I am interested to grow Grass Pea in Assam can you guide me

What does the microtubule-impacting anesthesia have on one-cell ciliates that need cilia to swim around?

I feel like ms blackmore is the type of person who shouts down those who disagree with her opinions. I say this after listening to this interview and then researching and watching some others of her. For that reason I will disregard everything she says. I also don't agree or disagree regarding chopra but didn't want to listen to her personal feelings about him.

I feel like the Rajnish used Sue as a springboard too much. Luckily, she seemed genuinely interested.

If we are talking Consciousness theories outside of the body, how can that be distinguished from consciousness reliant on or housed within the body? The problems I see are that all of the studies I am aware cannot rule out the dependence, even if it's effects are outside the body, and all evidence pointing to an outside consciousness not reliant on body in some way is suggestive yet not concrete. Is concrete evidence even possible? It's my personal leaning that this quantum consciousness does not operate independently from the body, though its reach is vast through means of entanglement and assisting in the Copenhagen collapse, which is impossible to compute. Other options are that 1) information is somehow either outside the universe undetected assisting in the state of collapse OR 2) that the information is within the universe but undetected presumably in vacuum energy form OR 3) that the information is within the universe outside the body but difficult / impossible to compute. Given those alternatives, I think it is more streamlined (in the Occam's razor approach) that the information is within the body but difficult / impossible to compute.

@terresciencepodcast351 You should really look in to the research of Anirban Bandyopadhyay et. al.

Future bio solution good to here that. Some information is secrete he can not telling. Thank you so much good information.

The Dark Unknown = the literal entanglonic force your very thoughts exert on this cursed reality; neuronal microtubule electron 7 forces influence on virtual particles and sub stringular corpuscles - the 0mniVerse is literally watching your EVERY THOUGHT, realitonic eventuation waveform for googolparsecs and tretrigintillion cyclic universe(s) 😄 laugh at me all you want, willfully ignorant ectofodder, burn eternally in a lake of 'boiling feces' if you accidentally desire, wtf is wrong with you lol, as your every single alternate dimension timeline gets shredded in a gargantuan mountain of knives, blooming everchanging blades, the solace of your ephemeral instant will never arrive {scout: the devil's instant is our eternity€ (beware of the Golden Rule if you despise pain and are dealing with hyperdimensional supermasochists)

Interesting discussion

It's becoming clear that with all the brain and consciousness theories out there, the proof will be in the pudding. By this I mean, can any particular theory be used to create a human adult level conscious machine. My bet is on the late Gerald Edelman's Extended Theory of Neuronal Group Selection. The lead group in robotics based on this theory is the Neurorobotics Lab at UC at Irvine. Dr. Edelman distinguished between primary consciousness, which came first in evolution, and that humans share with other conscious animals, and higher order consciousness, which came to only humans with the acquisition of language. A machine with primary consciousness will probably have to come first. What I find special about the TNGS is the Darwin series of automata created at the Neurosciences Institute by Dr. Edelman and his colleagues in the 1990's and 2000's. These machines perform in the real world, not in a restricted simulated world, and display convincing physical behavior indicative of higher psychological functions necessary for consciousness, such as perceptual categorization, memory, and learning. They are based on realistic models of the parts of the biological brain that the theory claims subserve these functions. The extended TNGS allows for the emergence of consciousness based only on further evolutionary development of the brain areas responsible for these functions, in a parsimonious way. No other research I've encountered is anywhere near as convincing. I post because on almost every video and article about the brain and consciousness that I encounter, the attitude seems to be that we still know next to nothing about how the brain and consciousness work; that there's lots of data but no unifying theory. I believe the extended TNGS is that theory. My motivation is to keep that theory in front of the public. And obviously, I consider it the route to a truly conscious machine, primary and higher-order. My advice to people who want to create a conscious machine is to seriously ground themselves in the extended TNGS and the Darwin automata first, and proceed from there, by applying to Jeff Krichmar's lab at UC Irvine, possibly. Dr. Edelman's roadmap to a conscious machine is at arxiv.org/abs/2105.10461