วีดีโอ

Unboxed my Boss 25, fited 25 1500fps rounds with ZERO issues. After that I put 25 1350fps rounds with 1 issue with cycling on probably the 48th shot. I was very impressed, after reading some of the issues most ppl were having.

Beautiful mines on a howa, but savage was my first choice. I really want to build one again, but now on an impulse. Great job even better look, Ackley was before his time.

Tire pressure ?

Keep us updated on this gun please I seen one for 250 around where I stand

Heres something eerily coincidental, today i was just function checking my magazines with snap caps and the 5 round ones were constantly jamming, while the 10 round Panzer Arms were smooth as silk. What did you do to the 5 round mags to improve the function? Thanks for sharing.

Another tip to making these work great is to lock the bolt back for a month.

I love mag fed semi auto 12 gauges. I have the JTS AK 12 gauge. Only because im partial to AK's. Love it. Yours looks pretty cool to. But you might have your front sight on backwards. I think theyre supposed to both fold back.

That bipod is half of the price of the shotgun 😂

Beauty of a beast in my opinion. What ammunition has worked for your shooting ?

Love the fast twist 22-250

Being a fan of Lee is not a matter of preference, but rather simply boils down to being a cheep skate. That having been said, Lee's collect style crimp dies [not to be confused with their factory style gimmicks] are the best on the market as of date. And that is as far as I can in all good conscience praise Lee for anything, other than the first half of their manual which has excellent information about reloading therein. If you noted I excluded the second half of their manual, which has the load data, from my praise it is because of the below information of which is stated in the first half of the Lee manual itself: In the Lee manual, on page 37, it states: "Bullets seated deeper than normal will reduce case capacity and increase pressure. This is not too critical for large rifle cases, but extremely important for pistol loads. Good load data specifies bullet seating depth or over all cartridge length. Do not seat the bullet to deep. On page 96, of the Lee manual, under the section of “The Latest Information On Pressure”, it states: "2) the extreme expansion (XTP and Gold Dot) handgun bullets have a large and deep nose cavity that makes them longer than a regular bullet of the same weight. This requires deeper depth resulting in higher pressure. Seating depth is very critical for handgun ammunition because of the small cases and large bores. ... … The usable volume of … … … the 45 ACP is 1.14cc. Seating bullets 1/16” deeper … .. … reduces the volume … 0.16cc for the 45 ACP. That’s ... ... ... a whopping 14% ... . This large volume reduction has an equally large effect on pressure that is made more critical because the maximum pressure for the 45 ACP is 1/3 of [plus 60,000 pound range as mentioned below. Keep in mind the 45 Colt working pressure is a mere 14,000 psi.] … On page 157, of Lee's manual under "Minimal Overall Length", It states: This is critical on most handgun cases. A small reduction in overall length can cause dangerous pressures because of reduced capacity caused by seating the bullet too deep. See details on page 96." On page 133, of the "Complete Reloading Guide", under "Loads For Handgun Cartridges", in bold font right under the heading it states: Loads for handguns ... with less case capacity ... when loading ... ... ... mere tenths of a grain of powder can make the difference between a good load and one that is dangerous. Approach the loading of handgun ammunition with these facts in mind." Plus on pages 88 thru 89, of the Lee manual, under "Signs Of Excessive Pressure" is a list of seven pressure signs and then the manual states the following: "It must be emphasized that these signs will not manifest themselves in ... low pressure rounds. These are signs of pressure in the plus 60,000 pound range. If you are loading for a gun designed to operate at 15,000 pounds pressure, you will most likely never find a loose primer because the gun would have blown up and spread the primer and gun parts over a wide area." And on page 158, in the section of “How To Read The Load Data”, under “XTP” it states : “Use these loads for the Hornady XTP, Speer Gold Dot, or Remington Golden Saber bullets. Now on page 270, of the Lee manual, under the “250 grain XTP” it gives load data with three different seating depths, because the data was taken from three different brand bullets, yet clumped together as if one. So if someone where to take the data developed for the shorter bullet and turn around and used it with the longer bullet they could very well raise pressures far above the 10% reduced starting charge weight. Especially if they use a case with smaller case capacity than that used in the development of the load data, as well as a hotter brand primer than that which was used to develop the data in the first place. Keep in mind that just changing the brand of primer can cause as much as a 2,000 psi rise in pressure alone, which can by itself swallow up the safety margin. Then throw in a case that has a reduced volume than the tested one and on top of all that seating the wrong bullet father in to the case, because it has a deeper hollow point and thicker cooper jacket, than what was used to developed the load data could easily displace the primer into one's own eye - so to speak. Or another way to put it would be as written in the book "Ammunition, Demystified", at the bottom of page 18, which says: "Use only the loading data published by the bullet manufacture! Substitution of loading data for equivalent weight bullets can get you into deep yogurt!" And I know for a fact that other manuals have stated not to switch brands of bullets even if they are of the same type. I would post them here if I had the time to wade through 30 different manuals to find where they spoke of such, but I am tired just having to have dug up the above and below. Head the warnings of reloading or not, but what ever you do try not to teach others to ignore them just because you might so choose. Again, the Richard Lee loading manual does not do pressure tests themselves, they only take test data from others that do and jumble it all together, of which they lose the test barrel length, case brand, primer type and brand, as well as bullet brand. These are all important elements, as one should never take data made for one specific brand and type bullet and turn and use it with a different brand or type bullet. This is due to Brinell hardness and bearing surfaces can be different, as well as the shape can be slightly different with longer or shorter lengths, all of which can cause extremely high pressure issues. One should only use data straight from a reputable data source [see paragraph below] that does their own pressure testing which give the test barrel length, case brand, primer type and brand, and most of all the brand of the type bullet used in developing the data. Each one of these elements that are changed is a compromise of which if all are compromised at the same time could very well add up to a recipe for disaster. First off, I am not implying that Lee plagiarized the data in their manual, just that they jumbled data from different sources together and lost key elements in the doing. And it has always been a given that one should use the starting loads and work their way up. This 10% reduction covers for smaller bore diameters, different lots of powder, different brand/lots of primers, and different brands of cartridge cases. These alone can take up that 10% relatively easy. Especially in pistol cartridges, as a little goes a long way in such small volume chambers. Lyman, Speer, Nosler, Sierra, Barnes, Swift, Berger, Norma, Lapua, VihtaVuori, Accurate, Western Powder, Hodgdon, or even Hornady reloading manuals are far better suited than Richard Lee's for gleaning load data from, as they all not only do their own testing but they all give the test barrel length, case brand, primer type and brand, as well as the bullets brand and type for each load recipe. Again Richard Lee's manual throws out one of the carnal safety rules of "never use load data developed for one brand of bullet for another brand of the same style bullet". Keep in mind that it is always better to throw out Richard Lee's manual than any of the safety rules. But with all that said, again, Richard Lee's reloading manual has a wealth of knowledge in the front half that makes the book well worth having. Just do not ignore the Cautions, Warnings, and Nevers there within.

5k-10k rounds through it?Big difference

Should have went 1:8 twist with the 77TMK or 75ELD

Very interesting video. Thank you for the walkthrough.

Nice rig

Great video! I just did this on my Stumpjumper today and realized that the blue bearing shown at 1:35 does not rotate at all on either side? Is that something you observed as well or is mine a defect?

Try Hornady 75 gr. V Max and Varget. Had 1/2 “ groups with IMR 4007 that was recalled due instability. Hodgdon recommended Varget. Works well in .224 Valkyrie and Berger 80.5 gr.

My 700 rem 220 swift shoots 5 shoots in that size group at200 yards

MDT makes a 22-250 metal AICS mag

Did you record this with a transistor radio?

I don't know what happened with the sound, looks like I need to figure out my microphone setup.

Nice build.

I cerchi sono a doppia camera/ doppia parete?

What is the weight of your bike?

Ordered this bike yesterday for £745, can't wait for it to arrive, was looking at the Trek Marlin range but opted for this in the same green for a less attractive target for thieves, and to double as a sneaky camping rig. looking forward to having both a road bike and an off road bike instead of swapping out my tyres for gravel ones every time I want to hit something bumpy

Should I buy the stump jumper alloy or comp alloy it’s going to be my first double suspension bike. Great video.!

You face planted by riding over a soft patch in the leaves. Then rode straight into a stump. Could have been easily avoided . It has completely nothing to do with the brakes. And everything to do with saddle time. Just saying.

The rear travel is measured by how much the rear axle goes up under full compression.

Adjust your rear brakes.. please 🥺

Does the base model stumper jumper as alloy have this

I own a 260 rem ss 700m excellent shooter here in Texas we can still find that ammo a superior round harvested many bucks including feral hogs, elk and mule deer as well

They have bike riding courses at the 4-h grounds for kids. Maybe start with some training wheels till you understand the fundamentals of riding

Nice build. I have all ways liked the 260 Remington. I have a Palmetto AR 10 on order. I went with 20inch stainless barrel in 308 Winchester. Going to upgrade the trigger to a Larue straight blade two stage trigger, Strike industries extended latch lever and a LMT muzzle brake. As for your miss sling plug on your stock. You have to buy them separately. Reason I know is I have the same stock. That’s the one thing that bothers me about Luth. In fact on my last build I bought a Magpul PRS instead. Got it for $175. Luth is less expensive normally. But when they nickel and dime for little items it adds up. Like both stocks.

What kinda range you looking to get with this rifle

The phrase that gets you ready is "Lock and load" or commonly referred to as "Lock-N-Load"... NO 'M' INVOLVED. And yes, if I heard it once, I heard it a thousand times, "Lock and load one (five, ten, thirty) round magazine". And now, my favorite, "stand at ease, smoke em if you got em".

The 260 Remington can do anything the 6.5 CM can do, and sometimes just a little bit better. As a hand loader, the thing I love the most about the 260 Rem is that I do not have to worry about brass shortages as long as there are 7.62 x 51 NATO or 308 Winchester brasses. Just run those brasses into a 7mm-08 Remington neck sizer die, then run the brass into a 260 Rem full-length sizer die, give the neck a slight trim and I'm ready to reload.

How’s the recoil on this bad boy?

well done my friend 👍