วีดีโอ

In fact, I believe more in the Duet of Sans and Papyrus, because it will be something really interesting, because surprisingly there is no fan game where there was a duet of Sans and Papirosych, because the merciless path is like a difficult mode here, and what could be the final test, if not two skeletons that give you a punch in the face. in general it would be brilliant if in the final court, when we arrive, Sans will be standing, and then he will judge, and then Papyrus will appear and will be the Lawyer, and will try to justify our actions, well, or also judge, we can do the opposite, that we will first see Papyrus, and then Sans will come, this will not destroy the underswap, because Sans will still be the second boss, and Papyrus will still be the judge, and will only be the boss in genocide, like Sans in the original. (that was my opinion on this matter).

Thanks For Calling Me Amazing

6:46 Actually, I have a theory about this. I think Frisk is behind it. Think about it: the Player never could overwrite the options, only choose one. However, here we see someone REWRITE them. Rewrite them to choices FRISK would do in the original UNDERTALE. That most likely means Frisk wants to get out of the Underground for whatever reason, but they are a lot more of a passive character, only activating when needed, but still hoarding control.

TS!Underswap True Google Route

I hate (and love) how this makes me want more out of what essentially isn't even there I want more of the nothing

Excellent analysis! In my opinion a lot of Undertale Yellow's messaging is overlooked, so this is a really nice reminder of how well the game hinted at certain topics. I would like to see perhaps in a future video a deeper look at the Clover-Martlet analysis, since in my opinion it is a major thing not often discussed. I will leave a little paragraph below justifying it. Clover and Martlet's bond is nothing short of special, and the game made it pretty obviously one of it's main focuses . I mean, it's assumed that Clover is just a kid who had a questionable home life at best, who moved on as soon as he fell. What I find most interesting is how he views Martlet, considering like with Toriel, in a similar fashion, as soon as he is shown a speck of love and affection, he is willing to drop his mission to find the kids and stay with her in the neutral ending, so it is quite obvious he appreciates her as a parental/caretaker figure way more than Ceroba. After all Martlet plays a crucial role in all 3 of the main routes of the game. In pacifist, most obviously, he spends the most amount of time with her, was worried for her wellbeing while in the jail, eand her voice being the climax of his "revelation" in the "Gift" cutscene about Clover being a "kind soul". Or how in neutral, he drops everything regarding his mission to talk to her on the rooftop, like, even Flowey tried to persuade him and even made a good point that he was the only one who was always by his side, but still to no avail he would end up being won by her proposal. NONE of Clover's dialogue options when asked to live with her are a refusal, at best just silence, which also show a lot of restraint in refusing her. And most interestingly, in genocide, he showed a fuckton of restraint exclusively for her, I mean he let her off the hook twice, and when he saw she was the only one who tried to see "good" in him, he showes difficulty in finding a real reason to hate her to finish her off. He does look in the final bosses memories in all routes, but here, it is different. In genocide, he always shot first and asked questions later,. Clover had to constantly remind himself of his goals with 1 word sentences to not lose focus, ("home", "freedom" "reconciliation" "closure")...I mean, by that point on the final geno fight he is too far gone, but I always interpreted it as even by that point struggling to find a reason to TRULY hate her, I mean, she was the only one who tried to see good in him until the bitter end. And I 100% guarantee that if the genocide route happened at some point before a true pacifist, Clover would end up resetting out of regret (I mean why would the game give us a choice to do that in the first place? I know repliability and all, but this always got me thinking).

I thought it was pretty obvious that “the entity” is Frisk, the same way the Frisk’s “entity” is Chara in Undertale, it would make sense that Frisk takes a more Flowey like approach because in Undertale, you are playing as Frisk and the player isn’t possessing Frisk or anything like that unlike in Deltarune, so Frisk is meant to represent us instead of the player being diegetic to the game, so TS!Underswap Frisk is a lot more like us and Flowey because they represent us in Undertale

9:22 umm this part is actually from trial by fury from cerobas genocide fight but eh point still stnands. nice video tho

The fact that Chara uses the Act option on Larry is more cruel than the Fight option imo

The developers saying that they were planning on having the ruthless Papyrus fight end in 1 shot helps support this. There'd be a lot of discontent if the final boss of the most hyped up route is that anti climactic

WE'RE WONSING!

Guys i think he WILL suffer

I WATCHED IT AS SOON AS 1 DAY YESSSSS OBLIGATORY COMMENT FOR ALGORITHM TAKEOVER

Something i noticed is that the evil route's bosses seem to be doing the opposite to Undertale's. Toriel got one-shot in an anticlimactic ending. Asgore had a full fight where he went out while trying to avenge his people in a very climactic way. Papyrus got one-shot in a fight where he was 100% serious and very emotional. Sans had a full fight where he trolls and mocks you. Now i don't know what other people think, but i cannot imagine alphys having a hyper-climactic sacrifice for monsterkind like undyne did, i imagine she will pull some "with the power of god and anime on my side!" Bullshit and die instantly (i could be wrong tho, this is only my opinion.) So what if the genocide bosses were the reverse of undertale? It would go with the whole Swap gimmick and it would make Papyrus REALLY anti-climactic

well y'know what would be interesting? we know when crossbones "Dies" Well he dies as a superhero his identity But sans is still alive...What if When we Go to fight papyrus instead of papyrus dying in one hit and actually believing his brother is actually dead.. sans jumps in the way taking the hit for papyrus... I feel like sans during the ruthless route his "Tactical retreat" If i must say pulling a martlet of course...we may have a harder battle with him in regard im very interested to see what else sans will do to try and stop us.

Honestly, it doesn't make any sense for me. This is probably the most looked for fight in the entire game and I get that that is the idea of this theory. I don't think the Dev Would make the most hyped for fight underwhelming. It just doesn't make any sense for me, but if this theory is true, then. I am sure a lot of people. Will Hate it.

damn..

Adding to some theories of how might the papyrus fight go in the ruthless route, i think the game will allude to his special attack, similar to undertale, only for him to die before he could use it. I think this fits nicely into the theme of narrative disappointment as well as a reflection of undertales approach.

This is an amazing video, I loved it :)

pretty much what i interpreted, awesome vid

Ummm, can you resume what you said? i didnt understand anything

You talking about his special attack being nothing makes me think, that maybe papyrus "nothing" would be him trying to spare you, like after his fight, he can't do nothing anymore, so he say that he would use his special attack, that would be nothing but his forgiveness, where he would try to make yo spare you because of his believed, and you just betray kill him, it would be like a parallel to his death in undertale. Like

13:48 Wait they are not going to do a "Megalo" for TS!Papyrus?,That means.... NO MISFORTUNE 🥺🥺🥺😭😭😭

cool theory!

One that might strengthen your theory is that in the ruthless route, if you reload after killing sans he will give you a revelation that permantly changes his interactions in all routes. He says : "No matter what you do, or have done in the past... remember that i've only ever tolerated you for the sake of others." This secret makes all interacions with Sans a lot sadder, making it clear that even during his hangout he only "tolerates" you. This implies that the game will go one step beyond just narative dissapointment and reach narative assasination. We already see something simillar to this with Koffin-K, his selfishness and carelessness allow us to continue. What if the ruthless route gives information that poisons our perceptions of the story and it's characters.

good video man❤

hi, i'm one of the devs! really cool to see what you came up with, great work!

He’s back!

17:15 NO!! PLEASE!! I DON'T WANNA DEAL WITH THIS GUY! LITERALLY NO CHECKPOINT ON PHASE 2 AND 20 DMG EVERY HIT LIKE WHAT.

I think TS underswap papyrus' fight will be the same as in undertale but with s and no kr. Or we may not even fight papyrus but we might fight someone else.

I think that the Narrative disspointment might be papyrus having a sort of heros journey during the ruthless and that somehow find out that the entity or player controlling them with papyrus having minute whole speech about saving them with climactic music during mid of the the final attack papyrrus says HERE IT COMES he uses the special attack just for the player just to absolutely destroy it as the music suddenly just stops papyrus bearly reacting gets cutt down not even getting to say his last words Just no conclusion or pay off, not sad, just abruply ends unsatisfying

Ruthless, Papyrus would probably be truly scared of you yet he'll try to see the good in you. But then worse stuff happen.

TS!Underswap schizophrenia theory

20:03 pink name? i thought that's undertale

The GOAT drops again

A detail to add to the theory. In the Sans Hangout when Papyrus and Sans play the fighting game a remark is made about the fighters chosen. Sans chooses a character with low stats but high stamina while Paps chooses the opposite. Sans even states high stats mean nothing if the character can’t take an attack. Perhaps in the Papyrus fight Papyrus will only be taken down in a single hit rather than actually having a full fight most people think.

hear me out, what if when we finally arrive to papyrus' fight, he first dodges the attack, but the moment its out turn again adn we attack again, chara could do a ''double attack'' like what we seen happen at the end of sans fight where we kill sans without imput, what if chara after experiencing sans, doesnt wanna deal with dodging and hard attacks again to a point they say ''screw this'' and insta kill him, and when his head falls off, he could say smth like ''w--wait! i havent even used my special attack ye-'' ''w-wait! please give me a-'' and then chara stomps his head to a dust. in a instant. giving us a unsatisfying challange as papyrus only did one hard attack