วีดีโอ

It's funny you say that because my friend sent me a video which (badly) colorized Casablanca the other day 😅 Full disclosure, there's also a follow-up video (link in the pinned comment) because I missed so much the first time around 😬

Yes! In the follow-up video (link in the pinned comment) I included a joke from the comments: "Lovett was sorry that he fed Chuck's ex." 😅

He wasn't even 'Chuck's Friend' he was 'Kelly's Uncle' so that line of reasoning was wrong for multiple reasons 😬 However, in the follow-up video (link in the pinned comment) I did expand on this to illustrate that he had a contentious attitude toward Kelly and probably knew her better than Chuck did. I mean, who's to say that Kelly and her _lawyer_ ex-husband's divorce wasn't caused by cheating?

The definition of _affair_ encompasses 'long-term relationships' as well.

Well said! 👏 I often joke that the film was probably a few _marketing meetings_ from being called 'Chucked Away' 😅

This feedback is great to hear, thank you! 😃

It's not an assumption: the film showed that Vincent had a heart condition with his cardiac event on the treadmill. (I agree with the rest of your analysis though.)

It's an interesting question, I mean, my grandfather said that _"If Chuck had been a soldier and not a postman everyone would have assumed that Kelly was cheating"_ because - probably because it reflects real life so well - this is what Hollywood has conditioned viewers to expect, such as with The Thin Red Line (1998), Jarhead (2005), and even Swing Shift (1984) which borders on glorifying it 😬

Thank you so much, you made my day! 😃

Thank you so much for the encouraging feedback! 😃

Well, some people are _exceptional_ 😅🏐☕

Not the case, but even if it was, there's nothing wrong with working backward from a conclusion: for example, Kelly's map worked backward from the rescue site to locate Chuck's island and - theoretically - if they'd concluded that Chuck could only be alive on _some island somewhere_ then maybe during the search they would have checked some islands and found him 🤷 It's similar to the fallacy I mentioned in this video - that there's nothing wrong with _circumstantial evidence_ and in many cases it's more reliable than so-called _direct evidence_ (such as eye-witness testimony) - in that 'backward reasoning/chaining/induction' is a powerful tool for problem solving so long as it's approached with intellectual honesty. You seem to have some misconceptions about evidence/logic/deduction/induction/reasoning/etc. and this stuff is worth reassessing in any case regardless of the betrayal theme discussed here.

You're right! Chuck showing up literally _out of the blue_ as Mr. Moneybags to save Kelly from mountains of debt and despair 😅 A few people had mentioned Chuck's settlement/compensation and to be honest I just don't know enough about this stuff, but it would be a great video for somebody with the relevant expertise to make, maybe Legal Eagle 😃

Men are also opportunistic, and you can never own an individual.

Just gotta find the right woman, they ain't all like that

@@user-do1fq8oy9c men are opportunistic.

Next you'll start saying "femaaaaales".

Full disclosure, I did mention the box in the follow-up video (link in the pinned comment) 😬

I like that! Unfortunately, at the Christmas Dinner they do say that her ex was a lawyer, which explains how she didn't have any cash from her divorce (don't mess with lawyers) 😬

That's a good thought! It feels right, but Kelly did also want to become a Professor and does seem unhappy with her life, i.e. _"I think about taking (my PhD) up again."_ so it's not so clear 🤔

Well said! 👏

"Never meet your heroes" 😔

😂

In 'Forrest Gump 2' he and his son find the Zoltar Machine so that Forrest can be small again 😬

Except Ricci. I love her.

That's weird. You're assuming everyone knew and took part in what was going on as if it occurred from the start of said party to the end of it.

I knew Helen hunt was a freak

​@@RealBradMillerdon't be daft. They ALL knew

Well said! Not to mention leaving a _practically finished_ PhD on the shelf, I mean, she made a complete 180 😬

4 years is a long time.

@@insomthegreat Agreed, 4 years is a _very_ long time to not re-schedule a dissertation defense 😬

Low gravity has a catastrophic effect on heart defects and the scene on the treadmill is the film _illustrating_ that he didn't beat the 99% odds, so Vincent would have passed away before reaching orbit, which is thematic of his swimming race with Anton i.e. _"not saving anything for the trip back."_

I'm like that with Die Hard (1988) and Jurassic Park (1993) they're on the TV so often I usually pick them up halfway through 😅

Thank you so much! 😃 There's also a follow-up video (link in the pinned comment) if you're interested 😄 I like the idea of someone finding Wilson washed up on a beach somewhere and fixing him. It's kinda like the sequel they planned where Chuck and Bettina find the Zoltare machine so that he can be big again 😅

😃 1- is an interesting question: I suppose that the packages would have been noted _not delivered_ 4 years ago and Chuck saw it as his duty to return them, maybe to make amends for opening them on the island (i.e. breaking the postman's code moral code?), but it begs the question whether he returned a version of the divorce decree re-written from his memory 😅 2- Those packages were all probably sent to multiple destinations throughout East Asia and were only on their _first transit_ with Chuck, so delivering them personally would have meant multiple flights to multiple countries and he probably didn't even have a new passport yet 😬 Also, many of them were time sensitive - birthday cards/presents, divorce decrees, and Bettina's letter - which is cool for the time theme in this film. 3- In the follow-up video (link in the pinned comment) I outline how the original script includes Bettina's letter in full and some green salsa for her estranged husband, so she was still hoping to reconnect with him, but by the end she's taken his name from the fence and (hopefully) moved on from being cast away. Thank you for the feedback! 😄

@ExtraCheeseProject finally... CLOSURE! 🤣🤣🤣 Thanks for the good reply 😉

Volleyball

I made a tennis ball & named Wilson. When I realized my children didn't understand the concept, I made them watch the movie. 😂 (They loved it also)

🏐❤‍🩹☕

A ghost? 😬

@@ExtraCheeseProject I think he is making a joking reference to another movie. Which I am not going to name to avoid committing a spoiler.

Maybe you should try using your senses. 😉

@@drsbhs @Sushi_Dinner Ah, I got you guys now 👻😅☕

Men can't be trusted.

Just a little observation... women ain't a thing you can own ;) they are indeed never yours buddy.

@lov_eli Really? They are just like cars. Why else would the government issue you a title for them in your name? But, we are in agreement. They absolutely sell the only thing they have to offer a man, to the highest bidder.

@@lov_eli Really? They are just like cars. Why else would the government issue you a title on them in your name? We are in agreement. They sell the only thing they have that a man is interested in, to the highest bidder. Until.... the next highest bidder comes along!

@lov_eli Really? Woman are like cars. The government gives a man a title on them in his name. We can agree that a woman will sell the only thing she has to the man that's the highest bidder. Until the next one comes along.

​@@user-do1fq8oy9cyou really are just pushing this narrative hard.

She does it well 🙂

Her father definitely was, she wasn't

2hrs is a UNDERSTATEMENT

Thank you for the re-watch! 😄 There's also a follow-up video (link in the pinned comment) if you're interested (I wish the algorithm would pick that one up as well tbh) 😅

We are meant to build a shelter and get food, Because life has became easy men have time for "emotions" and "talking about feelings"