I have a background in CFD (computational fluid dynamics) and when I see these patterns, I immediately think of the surface of a slow moving river where these patterns are the effect of undercurrents. When I see rotation curves of most spiral galaxies, I immediately think of micro eddies also as a consequence of a flow field with a Reynolds’s number of 4000 or so. If you look at DNS (direct numerical simulations) where the flow field is resolved to the theoretically smallest eddy scales, this is exactly the same pattern that you see. Dark energy fits well in a great river model as well where you get non uniform accelerating expansion due to a dynamic free surface. The only thing left to accommodate is the Big Bang, the supposed beginning of everything. But what if it’s not the beginning of everything but only the beginning of what we can see? A big splash in this great river would fit nicely because it would result in the the highly energetic yet super low entropy signature as seen in the CMB. Maybe we could collaborate on a TH-cam video, Arvin.
@@louislesch3878 You might be able to find a collaborator at the Summer of Math #2, just announced, which is aimed at pairing subject-matter experts with communicators. I would definitely watch this video and hope you will produce it.
Top notch presentation,. As someone who has been in the sciences for decades, I appreciate the quality of information. Clear presentation is not to be confused with dumbing down.it’s refreshing to have this type of quality. One caveat: ‘Might’ not impact us. This assumes that these speeds are constant.
"You can still sleep sound at night." It actually took me 4 tries to see this video end-to-end without falling asleep. The non-urgent food for thought, combined with the calming voice does an excellent job at helping me disconnect for the night.
Well we can still sleep sound at night for at least another billion years. After that tho, we need to start worrying about the big rip, but really the sooner we start to solve these issues the better! :P😆
I never really understood the great attractor and the expansion of the universe. I mean I understood roughly the concept, but you brought it to another level. Great video and thank you for the education lesson.
Since the current speed of the expansion of the universe is greater than the speed at which the Milky Way is moving towards the great attractor, I think that means from an outside perspective, we speeding away from the great attractor and towards nothing but empty new space. Or I guess we are speeding towards great attractor but great attractor relative to our position is speeding away from us faster than we could ever hope to catch up.
@@tylermcnally8232 You cannot have pressurized system next to a vacuum without a barrier. The force of 'gravity' is not going to be of help since the weak vacuum of your lungs on the earth surface can already make you drink with a straw, so forget about a weaker gravity doing anything against the 'pull' of a enormous supposed space vacuum. This is a contradiction, so a 'space vacuum' cannot exist above our (existing) atmosphere. Problem with our education is that we trust our teachers and we don't have enough time to think about and test what we learn. Hence we get deceived...
fun fact: If you Shazam the song at the very end of this vid at 15:40 you will find its called "When You Are Crying by Norene Murdock" yet if you search the entire internet, you won't find one playable or downloadable file or stream of it, apart from a 30 second clip from a weird place called chartoo. great vid. btw.
Now my brain is being pulled apart while I process all of this and the Great Attractor is now the refrigerator summoning me towards it to retrieve a frosty pint to finish my contemplation! Thank you so much for another brilliant presentation!
@@ArvinAsh But here comes my doubt. How do they calculate the movement of our galaxy towards the great attractor if our space is expanding at higher rate than the attraction itself. How can we understand our galaxies movement towards great attractor. I mean movements are the key right.. i dont undertand . Please if you can reply please help.
Arvinash you are the great Online teacher i have ever seen in my life . I NEVER imagined that i will ever be able to understand these complex Topics in that simplified way... Hats of Arvin . Love from India.🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳
channels like Arvin Ash, the versetarium and star talk have taught me more about theoretical physics than i would have learnt in a school and this inspires me to want to keep learning more about the universe.
Great video. I learn something new everytime I watch your channel. One note: “Begs the question” doesn’t mean “raises the question” as you used it. It means that the answer assumes the very point being raised by the question.
In classical rhetoric and logic, begging the question or assuming the conclusion (Latin: petitio principii) is an informal fallacy that occurs when an argument's premises assume the truth of the conclusion, instead of supporting it. For example, the statement "Green is the best color because it is the greenest of all colors" claims that the color green is the best because it is the greenest - which it presupposes is the best. It is a type of circular reasoning: an argument that requires that the desired conclusion be true. This often occurs in an indirect way such that the fallacy's presence is hidden, or at least not easily apparent. In modern vernacular usage, however, begging the question is often used to mean "raising the question" or "suggesting the question". Sometimes it is confused with "dodging the question", an attempt to avoid it, or perhaps more often begging the question means simply leaving the question unanswered. The phrase begging the question originated in the 16th century as a mistranslation of the Latin petitio principii, which in turn was a mistranslation of the Greek for "assuming the conclusion".
Good stuff sir. Got a bunch of my required science fix here. Have a son who, when he was 15, declared himself to be the Great Attractor. He had just learnt about it in school. Ha, ha, funny son. Problem with that is the great attractor is way older than you and way more massive. Without missing a step, he walked up to me, patted my belly, called me Sir TGA, and ran out the door. I expected nothing less. Between ourselves, I was Sir TGA, and he was Mr. U. Every kiss begins with "K," but ugly starts with "U" son.
Thank you Arvin Ash for the beautiful program. As always you explained a hard subject in a way that is easily understandable. You did not leave anything out so all of the questions were answered at the conclusion of the program.
Not really. Are you and I moving farther apart? Is the moon moving farther from the earth? The earth from the sun? The answer is 'no'. The local effects of gravity maintain the distance between objects in their local gravitational field. You are not expanding outwards in all directions.
I can't sleep calmly after those videos, every time i watch videos like this i get a existencial crisis because of the short time we are alive and how much we will miss. Great video however and that's the reason i watch those kind of videos anyway.
I have a PhD in science and did physics at Uni, yet struggle to understand things. I am fascinated by particle physics and astronomy, but Arvin Ash, for me, is above all, with the possible exception of Anton Petrov, in explaining things clearly
This was truly an excellent explanation of a subject that I am not "educated" in but is stimulating. I appreciate the condensed approach to share complex information. I understand that is a documentary mode of theory based on the presenters facts - as always great.
Arvin ... you are doing an AMAZING & WONDERFUL work 🙌🙌🙌🙌🙌🙌 Thankyou so much ... my days are much more meaning with your videos. Big hug from Sao Paulo-Brazil.
The research that I have been doing on my own leads me to believe this to be true. .Dark flow has been my most favorite cosmological scientific research done to this day. I do feel like I might have an idea of what is attracting us to the great attractor or what is pulling the great attractor in that direction.
I learnt something new today. Very well presented! Of course, I do understand, our attempts to make more sense of our universe is mostly based on prevailing knowledge that we have accumulated so far. So, this may or may not be relevant in future when we are able to unravel the mystery of dark energy and likes of it, which perhaps we still aren't aware of, as yet. Nevertheless, learning something new is so exciting :) Keep them coming!!
We say dark energy is the dominant force however it could be as he said the milkey way is moving and the earths rotation is moving as well and according to the observer that could lead to a optical illusion 😐also how can the entire cosmos only be 14 billion years old ?😐it does not make since 😓
Yet another video where Arvin knocks it out of the ballpark. Up until 12:40 I'd been getting fidgety wondering "how does this square with hubbles observed expansion?" I should have known Arvin wouldn't leave something as important as that unanswered. Thanks agian my friend, looking forward to your next video o7
I really appreciate the way you end this. I am utterly fascinated with pretty much everything you covered (and explained so well!) yet at the same time I find myself terrified by it all. Like, I can't wrap my brain around the expansion of the Universe and Space-Time itself, because then I wonder why don't we observe this as each second of time goes on, if it's increasing at an ever faster rate? And when would it stop? Would it ever? Would matter itself expand? How far does this behavior of the cosmos go exactly? Just crazy stuff...
just found your channel and damn, why only now?! you are just SO GOOD, i think i have my new favourite science channel...:) thank you for your efforts, i appreciate it very much!
You do a great job, Arvin! It is a true joy to watch your presentations. Could you a take a further step and try to explain the old testament's chapters 38-41 of Job? These chapters refer to constellations and to their relations either in the future or in an old era. Could for example monoceros collide (or have collided) with the beehive cluster in cancer? (Job 39:9) Could "the Pleiades' bond" with Orion be the fact that Orion is always running behind them? (38:31) Or maybe "the Pleiades' bond" is the fact that all this constellation's stars have the same proper motion (μ)? .. All Job's chapters look like a theatrical play, with constellations taking the place of characters.. Why? Could Job also serve as an allusion to past events (or future ones) and people who played (or shall play) a significant role in history? This is my conclusion reading carefully the descriptions of Sagitarrius depicted as a belligerent man on a horse who smells the war from afar, says to himself "well done" and throughs himself in it, of Dragon depicted as a crocodile, whom God shall drag through a hoop by his nostrils and lips, of the Ostrich depicted as a careless and flighty mother etc. There are also explicit indications about the earth who remains "glued" near the sun as if by cement mortar (Job 38:38) as well as to the recent theory of invisible walls in space, if one considers "the sea" as an allusion to space and the "gates" and "locks" (38: 8 and 10) as "boundaries" of black matter and black holes respectively, above which the antimatter expands; This allusion to the space's dual nature as matter and antimatter is more accentuated in Genesis 1: 1, 6 and 7, if we consider the vault as the invisible walls in space, the "water above the vault" as flux of E/M waves of antimatter and the water under the vault as flux of E/M waves of matter. The "light" and the "darkness" could mean the projection of waves of antimatter into a 3D Higgs space, this projection being done by means of the dark holes taking the place of splits on these "invisible walls", as is the case with the double split experiment, where "light" and "darkness" occur as stripes when a beam of light (a beam of E/M wave) passes through one hole, or as waves when there are two holes. With so many black holes, I guess God did a "million split" experiment and thus created "the sea" of E/M information (and matter) waves, with galaxies at their points of interface!! Wow! Back to Job now: If my guess is right, then "sand" must be time!! What else could it mean: "I put sand as boundary for the sea and told to the sea: you shall go up to here but no further and your waves shall collide inside you" BUT the fact that every being is restrained by spacetime in 3 dimensions, INSIDE which all other dimensions are folded as if they were waves colliding in this being's earthly boundaries? (chapter 38 : 8-11).. BTW in Job 38:37 mention is being done about the "tilting" of the sky towards the earth, that being the earth's orbital inclination!!! But Arvin, please explain genesis 1: 1 and 2! How else could the earth be formless and without shape, if God created it first along with the sky? Could he have created just a simulation in the beginning? How else could earth have produced vegetation without sun, as vegetation came forth on the third day of the creation, whereas the sun was created on the fourth day, if not as a vegetation's simulation?.. Finally: Does chapter 1 paragraphs 9 and 10 of Genesis signify Pangaea!!?
Last remark to comment on Arvin, if you wish, but not least: In Isaiah 33:23 the septuagint tanslation, apparently referring to a ship's mast and sails, reads: "Your mast (or web or tissue) has tilted; it will not damage the sails".. Since you mentionned the Vela constellation in your video, I thought I should point out that "Vela" means "sails", "ΙΣΤΙΑ" in greek, the official translation's language and the word "IΣΤΟΣ" in greek means either mast, or web, or even tissue in english, but due to this word's (must = IΣΤΟΣ) correlation with the word sails ("IΣΤΙΑ"), we translate "ΙΣΤΟΣ" as "mast", instead of "web" or even "tissue".. In greek mythology while Jason was sitting on Argo, the argonauts' ship, preserved in the temple of Athena, the ship's mast broke! So my opinion is that maybe the literal meaning of this passage is an allusion to the greeks as sailors of the world and ultimately of the universe.. (don't laugh, because there are lots of greeks who do "sail in the universe").. My questions are the following: 1) Is there any possibility the other (not literal) meaning of this phrase to be: "your web has tilted; it won't damage the vela (constellation)" or "the Vela (supercluster)"? As you pointed out our galaxy is heading towards the great attractor and the shapley SCL. So could this be the "tilting" of our (galactic) net (web = ΙΣΤΟΣ) away from the Vela SCL (ΙΣΤΙΑ)? Another strange coincidence ( maybe an allusion to something?) is that the 70 (72 to be exact) jewish translators used the word "SAILS" (IΣΤΙΑ) in Exodus 27: 11 - 15 in order to render the relevant hebrew word meaning "covers" (serving as curtains hanging between the pillars of the courtyard), whereas in Exodus 27:16 they used the word "COVER" (KAΛΥΜΜΑ) to render the curtain hanging in front of the courtyard's gate ! 2) Could the phrase "(I am) The one who stretched out the sky alone (by myself)" in Job 9:8 be allegorically related to a tensor set in the universe as point of reference? The participle used in the greek translation is "Ο ΤΑΝΥΣΑΣ", meaning "the one who has tensioned, stretched", like a bird does with its wings, therefore it is called "TANΥΣΙΠΤΕΡΟ" (ΤΑΝΥΖΩ + ΠΤΕΡΑ).. I know these are stupid questions, but as we know that there is a "cosmic web" consisting of hydrogen and 60% of all existing gases which caused the formation of galaxies (at the points where this cosmic web's waves-streams interface) and that all galaxies are interconnected through "filaments", as happens in a net, I'm just contemplating the chance that this cosmic net or web could one day damage the Vela constellation or its synonymous supercluster.. I would very much appreciate your answer! It would be great if astronomers did an effort to decode the meaning of some of the old testament's chapters, whith reference to modern inventions and theories. Why not after all? Especially if someone could try and explain 1) How could it be explained that God always appears as a whirlpool, as a whirling cloud to his chosen ones (numbers 12:5), or as a nebula in fire (Exodus 24:16 - 18) as Jesus will, according to Apocalypse 1:7 , to 1 Thessalonians 4:17 and to Acts 1:11 ? Could this apparition translate as a "fluorescent plasma", ionization? 2) If the transformation of all beings "at atomic level, at the twinkling of an eye" (Corinthians 1,15:52 "ἐν ἀτόμῳ, ἐν ριπῇ ὀφθαλμοῦ") could occur as "nebulization" of atoms, based on what we know today.. The greek translation says "εν ατομω", that is "at atomic level"! ... and NOT AS elsewhere translated "each one of us"; In this case it should read "ΑΤΟΜΙΚΩΣ" or "ΚΑΘΕΙΣ ΕΞ ΗΜΩΝ"! There are also several translations that omit the phrase "EN ATOMΩ".. The correct translation of the old and new testament in greek is here: apostoliki-diakonia.gr/bible/bible.asp?contents=new_testament/contents_E_Paulou_KorinthA.asp&main=E_Paulou_KorinthA&file=3.1.2.15.htm 3) why Jesus's body was shining during his transfiguration on mount Thavor, as Mathew 17:1-8, Luke 9:28-36 and Mark 9:2-8 recount; Isn't it true that all atoms emit light when an electron changes orbit and falls into a lower one? Could something similar have happened? And if so, could this change of orbit be not only connected with the emission of light, but also with levitation, as Jesus was levitating at that moment? 4) the extraordinary way God appeared in front of David in Β' Bασ 22: 8-17 (Kings B' 22: 8-17). The link to the greek translation is here: www.imgap.gr/file1/AG-Pateres/AG%20KeimenoMetafrasi/PD/10.%20VasilionB.htm I don't know which english translation correctly and accurately renders the septuagint, but I wish you good luck in finding one! Maybe the office of the greek archbishop could help, or this site too : www.biblegateway.com/ I think that for english one should look up the "Complete Jewish Bible" comparing it with the "Orthodox jewish bible" translation. BTW Job 38:32 reads: "ἦ διανοίξεις μαζουρὼθ ἐν καιρῷ αὐτοῦ καὶ ῞Εσπερον ἐπὶ κόμης αὐτοῦ ἄξεις αὐτά;" As the greek septuagint translation has it, using the verb "ΔΙΑΝΟΙΞΕΙΣ", the accurate and literal translation of this passage should be: "or will you OPEN UP (BREAK OPEN) MAZZAROTH"... (Mazzaroth is "the constellation" in general and not specifically The great bear) ... "in its time AND HESPERUS " (Hesperus is the planet Aphrodite) .. "and lead them upon ITS HAIR?" My opinion is that passage 32 should refer to the previous passage 31, where God talks about Orion's barrier too, apart from the bond of the Pleiades! What else could "open up" or "break open", but a barrier? So passage 32 should mean the "opening" of specifically Orion's barrier in time, and not to any other constellation.. This barrier, impeding Orion from reaching the Pleiades, will break open and the two constellations shall collide. This is how I see it.. It should further mean Orion's collision with Hesperus, that is Aphrodite (ΔΙΑΝΟΙΞΕΙΣ ΜΑΖΟΥΡΩΘ ΕΝ ΚΑΙΡΩ ΑΥΤΟΥ "KΑΙ ΕΣΠΕΡΟΝ") and their falling upon "Come Berenice's" (KAI EΠΙ ΚΟΜΗΣ ΑΥΤΟΥ ΑΞΕΙΣ ΑΥΤΑ) as there is no other constellation with "hair" (ΚΟΜΗ). According to greek mythology, Berenice had dedicated (sacrificed) her hair (KOMH) to the godess Aphrodite.. So a reverse sacrifice might happen in the future !!! As we know from Luke 21:25 - 28 and Matthew 24:29, 30 that the powers of the sky shall be shaken (or shall convulse), I wonder what the astronomers' simulations forecast in the future ! Isaiah 34:4 predicts: a) the melting of the powers of the sky, 2) the flicking through of the skies like the flicking through of a book ; I have watched documentaries showing a possibly existing multiverse having the form of a book with a spine, this meaning a common origin and the book's pages were opened up, meaning that all possible universes were light years apart from each other. 3) the falling of all stars, like the leaves of vines and the leaves of figs do. How could all these happen, what could the cause of such catastrophes be? Thanks in advance for the time taken to read this comment.
Very interesting and intelligible-the logical extrapolation would seem to be that all matter agglomerates to ever-denser units, until everything disappears into ultra-super-massive "black holes""-(which maybe then explode at "absolute maximum" temperature & pressure, restarting the whole cycle?)
Great little video 👍interesting, I think the idea of something massive outside the visible universe is a good theory. We just dont know,but I think that a QC would be able to "extrapolate " what could be causing this draw.
I love that you answered my question about the great attractor and the expansion of the universe before I could ask it. If I may ask I’ll ask a fringe question. Could this be a primordial black hole that is using galaxies like yo-yo’s?
My favorite theory involving dark flow is, There is another universe, outside of our own. At one point we thought that all the bright objects were suns/stars. Then we discovered that they included galaxies. Since then we have found Sagan Units of galaxies, you know, "billions and billions". So why can't there be a universe, out there, in fact Sagan units of universes, just beyond our ability to detect. More massive than our universe. Not strings or dimension, just more rocks on rocks, just like our universe with the same laws of nature. A lot more fun to consider, without all the elegant math getting in the way.
All this shows is that we know nothing and are so very insignificant. We base so many observations on theoretical equations, and if the equations end up being wrong by even a fraction of a percent, everything we think we know is wrong. Right now we say our understanding and equations are backed up by the observations, but realistically we are making it all fit by trying to explain something we neither understand, nor have the technology to truly see.
A great tutorial. Scientific endeavor, the ability to make a living thinking about all this, writing it down, speculating, theorizing, made possible by a world of people farming, processing, transporting, drilling for oil, running steel mills and power plants, making the physical world we know, so that some folks can sit around and ponder things.
New information for me in this video. I love this type of mystery. The great attractor seems to be an important clue to the mystery of gravity. Imagine the combined kinetic energy of each of the great attractors your described. The significance of quark and lepton action and interaction to me is mind boggling. Our current understanding of the Higgs field and gluon is currently too limited. As to the cosmological constant dark energy and gravity question, I am fascinated by gravity inside a black hole and the actions of quaks an leptons and the curvature of spacetime or time space and the super colider singularity result measured and superposition states. If the gluon force were extended or a new wave field discovered that extended the strong nuclear force seems to be a possible path to follow. To me I am fascinated by the attractive force proton neutron quark kinetic energy measured state heald together by the gluon wave field superposition state. Amazing!
Try taking some Dramamine. It might help you sleep. I needed to take some because after watching Arvin’s video I began experiencing motion sickness from hurtling through the universe.
Great Informative video. Also at the end the final note. Not to fear about these they will have no impact on us Or our solar system. At least negative. In contrast other people usually make it scary, but the fact is not so scary. By the way Great video, excellent explanation
We should also be considering the dimension of time in this discussion. We are moving toward a singularity of time, along a temporal kind of geodesic ... as we do space dilates much like time would in a black hole. The universe is basically a time hole. We are speeding up as we get to the end of time, which causes the the illusion of accelerating spacial expansion.
according to E=mc^2 time [past, future] doesn't exist. the speed of light, causality and so called time is all the same. time is light itself. that what you see around yourself is space. according to E=mc^2 space is an illusion [as time it is as well]. E=mc^2 says two mindblowing postulates. the only motion that there is, is the speed of light. however, at the speed of light there is no motion [time] and there is no space. according to E=mc^2 the only frame [reality] that there is, is spacetime where space and time are two virtual [non existing] vectors in this 4d frame. in spacetime your speed is always the speed of light so space and time are both an illusion. *"People like us, Who believe in Physics know that the distinction between the past, present and future is nothing else but a stubborn human illusion"* Einstein describing spacetime. there is no past, there is no future............there is no spoon. according to minkowski and einstein [and spacetime] the frames that we call the past, the present and the future are all fused in one single and the same moment called spacetime. everything what is in the universe ever is happening right here and right now. I know, it's difficult to grasp it, even for me who fully understands the special relativity but it is in this way just like E=mc^2 tells us. now, you can ask like "I see space around me, all of that that you have written is bs". well, your brain cannot depict or better said visualize the 4 dimensional reality. it can hardly visualize the 3 dimensional frame. simirarly a full hd monitor cannot depict the 4k resolution. your brain is a full hd monitor, the reality is the 4k resolution.
Can you explain why the CMB is static, which allows us to see the redshift showing that we are moving? Why isn't the CMB also affected by the Great Attractor? I know it has no mass, but it still has energy and so should be affected by gravitation, no?
Hello Mr.Arvin, as always phenomenal video. I recently came across the topic of great attractor and your video just came at perfect time! Also I would like to suggest the video of SEA on this very topic. I am sure you will really like it.
Superb explanation. I thought that Virgo cluster was the last word on supermassive clusters. Everything attracts everything else in the universe, yet the universe continues to expand at an accelerated rate of velocity. What can be more mystifying than this! Every space object is in a tearing hurry to get away from its neighbors.
Meh. It’s actually space time that is expanding, and every structure is just floating on top of it, so it “appears” like everything is trying to run away from everything else, but we are actually moving towards the Andromeda galaxy and will collide with it eventually lol. I know you know all this all ready, but forgive me, I’m just flexing my new brain power from the brain implants I bought on EBay last week. I boosted my intelligence to +4 for only $50! What a deal tho
My friend have Dark Flow in his apartment. When sleeping there in night and darkness, a slow flowing of cold air from the old windows is can be felt. This Dark Flow sometimes also brings smell from nearby outhouse.
I have a background in CFD (computational fluid dynamics) and when I see these patterns, I immediately think of the surface of a slow moving river where these patterns are the effect of undercurrents. When I see rotation curves of most spiral galaxies, I immediately think of micro eddies also as a consequence of a flow field with a Reynolds’s number of 4000 or so. If you look at DNS (direct numerical simulations) where the flow field is resolved to the theoretically smallest eddy scales, this is exactly the same pattern that you see. Dark energy fits well in a great river model as well where you get non uniform accelerating expansion due to a dynamic free surface. The only thing left to accommodate is the Big Bang, the supposed beginning of everything. But what if it’s not the beginning of everything but only the beginning of what we can see? A big splash in this great river would fit nicely because it would result in the the highly energetic yet super low entropy signature as seen in the CMB. Maybe we could collaborate on a TH-cam video, Arvin.
That's very interesting.
10’ long
@@louislesch3878 You might be able to find a collaborator at the Summer of Math #2, just announced, which is aimed at pairing subject-matter experts with communicators. I would definitely watch this video and hope you will produce it.
But rivers flow in channels. What channels the matter in space? Gravity tends to pull matter into balls, not filaments.
IIRC professor N. K. Spyrou and K. Kleidis from Physics, AUTh, Greece made a paper DOING something similar but also with thermodynamics
Top notch presentation,. As someone who has been in the sciences for decades, I appreciate the quality of information. Clear presentation is not to be confused with dumbing down.it’s refreshing to have this type of quality.
One caveat: ‘Might’ not impact us. This assumes that these speeds are constant.
"You can still sleep sound at night." It actually took me 4 tries to see this video end-to-end without falling asleep. The non-urgent food for thought, combined with the calming voice does an excellent job at helping me disconnect for the night.
Glad to hear that. I'm trying to solve the world's insomnia problem.
His videos are my lullabies too 😂
Well we can still sleep sound at night for at least another billion years. After that tho, we need to start worrying about the big rip, but really the sooner we start to solve these issues the better! :P😆
I never really understood the great attractor and the expansion of the universe. I mean I understood roughly the concept, but you brought it to another level. Great video and thank you for the education lesson.
Since the current speed of the expansion of the universe is greater than the speed at which the Milky Way is moving towards the great attractor, I think that means from an outside perspective, we speeding away from the great attractor and towards nothing but empty new space.
Or I guess we are speeding towards great attractor but great attractor relative to our position is speeding away from us faster than we could ever hope to catch up.
The staggering gullibility…
Space is fake as fuck.
2nd law of thermodynamics, anyone?!?
@@duncanvantongeren4646 source?
Great attractor is one of Ultimecia's HP attacks in Dissisdia Final Fantasy ☕
@@tylermcnally8232 You cannot have pressurized system next to a vacuum without a barrier.
The force of 'gravity' is not going to be of help since the weak vacuum of your lungs on the earth surface can already make you drink with a straw, so forget about a weaker gravity doing anything against the 'pull' of a enormous supposed space vacuum.
This is a contradiction, so a 'space vacuum' cannot exist above our (existing) atmosphere.
Problem with our education is that we trust our teachers and we don't have enough time to think about and test what we learn.
Hence we get deceived...
fun fact: If you Shazam the song at the very end of this vid at 15:40 you will find its called "When You Are Crying by Norene Murdock" yet if you search the entire internet, you won't find one playable or downloadable file or stream of it, apart from a 30 second clip from a weird place called chartoo.
great vid. btw.
Is it this one? th-cam.com/video/27_gclx7Im0/w-d-xo.html
Now my brain is being pulled apart while I process all of this and the Great Attractor is now the refrigerator summoning me towards it to retrieve a frosty pint to finish my contemplation! Thank you so much for another brilliant presentation!
😂😂👍
I'll drink to that!
@@ArvinAsh But here comes my doubt. How do they calculate the movement of our galaxy towards the great attractor if our space is expanding at higher rate than the attraction itself. How can we understand our galaxies movement towards great attractor. I mean movements are the key right.. i dont undertand . Please if you can reply please help.
Arvinash you are the great Online teacher i have ever seen in my life . I NEVER imagined that i will ever be able to understand these complex Topics in that simplified way... Hats of Arvin . Love from India.🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳
The idea of a larger mass outside the visible universe, causing expansion (dark energy) is an intriguing idea!
channels like Arvin Ash, the versetarium and star talk have taught me more about theoretical physics than i would have learnt in a school and this inspires me to want to keep learning more about the universe.
I had no idea there is something even bigger than great attractor. Stunning video, amazing info. Thank you sir
Thanks Arvin & The Team, you're all great.
Excellent video. Very interesting, informative and worthwhile video. Many thanks for the links to the papers.
WHAT A VIDEO MAN ! HAT'S OFF TO ARVIN SIR.. IT EXPLAINS EVERYTHING NEEDED
Never a boring Arvin Ash video. Heck, never even a boring minute in an Arvin Ash video. Very well done. Looking forward to your next video, my friend.
The way you explain the concept is incredible.
Great video. I learn something new everytime I watch your channel. One note: “Begs the question” doesn’t mean “raises the question” as you used it. It means that the answer assumes the very point being raised by the question.
No.
In classical rhetoric and logic, begging the question or assuming the conclusion (Latin: petitio principii) is an informal fallacy that occurs when an argument's premises assume the truth of the conclusion, instead of supporting it.
For example, the statement "Green is the best color because it is the greenest of all colors" claims that the color green is the best because it is the greenest - which it presupposes is the best.
It is a type of circular reasoning: an argument that requires that the desired conclusion be true. This often occurs in an indirect way such that the fallacy's presence is hidden, or at least not easily apparent.
In modern vernacular usage, however, begging the question is often used to mean "raising the question" or "suggesting the question". Sometimes it is confused with "dodging the question", an attempt to avoid it, or perhaps more often begging the question means simply leaving the question unanswered.
The phrase begging the question originated in the 16th century as a mistranslation of the Latin petitio principii, which in turn was a mistranslation of the Greek for "assuming the conclusion".
One of my favorites from you and I've watched dozens of your videos so happily. So so so interesting! Thanks Arvin!
This video earned a sub.I came in not expecting to learn much and left wanting to learn more. That is perfect. Thank you for making this
Thanks for the sub!
Thanks once more for explaining this topics with such clarity
Astronomy and physics are so interesting that even knowing that there are things we don't know is fascinating.
Good stuff sir. Got a bunch of my required science fix here. Have a son who, when he was 15, declared himself to be the Great Attractor. He had just learnt about it in school. Ha, ha, funny son. Problem with that is the great attractor is way older than you and way more massive. Without missing a step, he walked up to me, patted my belly, called me Sir TGA, and ran out the door. I expected nothing less. Between ourselves, I was Sir TGA, and he was Mr. U. Every kiss begins with "K," but ugly starts with "U" son.
The scale of our universe is mind boggling...I can't describe the feeling I get when I ponder such scales of size....small? Miniscule?
Superb presentation...how can someone explain these complex terms so easily. This is awesome.
I was holding my breath while watching this!! ..wow
Excellent content. Excellent presentation. You are at the top of your game!
I’ve been interested in the subject for quite a while and this was the best description that I’ve seen. Thank you.
SEA did a great job on this concept with a good visualization...
Thank you Arvin Ash for the beautiful program. As always you explained a hard subject in a way that is easily understandable. You did not leave anything out so all of the questions were answered at the conclusion of the program.
Not really. Are you and I moving farther apart? Is the moon moving farther from the earth? The earth from the sun? The answer is 'no'. The local effects of gravity maintain the distance between objects in their local gravitational field. You are not expanding outwards in all directions.
Excellent. The best clear science on TH-cam.
This channel is my go-to place for expanding my consciousness - who needs psychedelics when we have this to ponder.
I agree. Who needs drugs, when we can just ponder the wonder of reality!
This cosmic content is truly top shelf! Your explanations and detail very well presented. Mahalo!
I'm so relieved! This was such a cliffhanger but now I know we will be safe 😁✔️👍
I wish I could upvote this more than once. Thank you!
Great update, thank you for pulling it all together! :):):)
So would you say that Arvin Ash and his videos are a great attractor for you?
I can't sleep calmly after those videos, every time i watch videos like this i get a existencial crisis because of the short time we are alive and how much we will miss. Great video however and that's the reason i watch those kind of videos anyway.
Thanks for the explanation of the CMB dipole. I had curiosities on that for awhile now but this definitely makes sense.
Black void! I love learning something new everyday! Truly makes life worth living and exploring!
Another wonderful video from Arvin Ash. I love them!
Love your video my friend ... clear explanation of very complicated phenomena ...even for those who do not use English perfectly .. like me hh ...
My favorite space channel. Love your arvin ash
Your method of story telling gave me the shivers and made my brain tingles
I have a PhD in science and did physics at Uni, yet struggle to understand things. I am fascinated by particle physics and astronomy, but Arvin Ash, for me, is above all, with the possible exception of Anton Petrov, in explaining things clearly
Glad you enjoy these videos. Thanks for letting me know. I appreciate it.
WoW!!! That was mind-blowing and mind-boggling
Thank you once again for the beautiful presentation.
This was truly an excellent explanation of a subject that I am not "educated" in but is stimulating. I appreciate the condensed approach to share complex information. I understand that is a documentary mode of theory based on the presenters facts - as always great.
You are the best! Thank you for making physics and astrophysics so accessible!
One of the best videos yet! Thank you!
Arvin ... you are doing an AMAZING & WONDERFUL work 🙌🙌🙌🙌🙌🙌 Thankyou so much ... my days are much more meaning with your videos. Big hug from Sao Paulo-Brazil.
The research that I have been doing on my own leads me to believe this to be true. .Dark flow has been my most favorite cosmological scientific research done to this day. I do feel like I might have an idea of what is attracting us to the great attractor or what is pulling the great attractor in that direction.
Another great video, thanks for making them.
I learnt something new today. Very well presented! Of course, I do understand, our attempts to make more sense of our universe is mostly based on prevailing knowledge that we have accumulated so far.
So, this may or may not be relevant in future when we are able to unravel the mystery of dark energy and likes of it, which perhaps we still aren't aware of, as yet.
Nevertheless, learning something new is so exciting :) Keep them coming!!
We say dark energy is the dominant force however it could be as he said the milkey way is moving and the earths rotation is moving as well and according to the observer that could lead to a optical illusion 😐also how can the entire cosmos only be 14 billion years old ?😐it does not make since 😓
Great vid. Fascinating stuff. Thumbs up and subscribed.
Thanks for providing some numbers and detail. More detail the better.
Great informative content 👍 you seems such a nice person friend 👏🏻
Thank God Arvin explained this, i couldn’t sleep worrying over whether the universe will disintegrate while I slept.
Another great video as usual Arvin, thank you!
Glad you enjoyed it!
Thank you for the great explanation. You are perfectly gifted to be a great teacher
Yet another video where Arvin knocks it out of the ballpark. Up until 12:40 I'd been getting fidgety wondering "how does this square with hubbles observed expansion?" I should have known Arvin wouldn't leave something as important as that unanswered. Thanks agian my friend, looking forward to your next video o7
I really appreciate the way you end this. I am utterly fascinated with pretty much everything you covered (and explained so well!) yet at the same time I find myself terrified by it all.
Like, I can't wrap my brain around the expansion of the Universe and Space-Time itself, because then I wonder why don't we observe this as each second of time goes on, if it's increasing at an ever faster rate? And when would it stop? Would it ever? Would matter itself expand? How far does this behavior of the cosmos go exactly?
Just crazy stuff...
Did you already figure it out?
Excellent, very clear, concise and complete. Thank you so much.
I like you, Arvin! You didn't bore me or hit me with too much math for my BA/History to handle.
Great video!! I always wonder about the great attractor.
very well put together! this is one of my favourite channels on TH-cam. ^_^
انت الافضل دائما ، رائع و عظيم كالعادة شكرا لمجهودك و معلوماتك
Very interesting but I must admit Im not up to speed with this video but I really enjoyed watching. Thanks for sharing 🌌
Hello Mr. Ash, how do we even meassure the relativ speed or Direktion of Distanz galaxies? This does not seem quite possible to me
just found your channel and damn, why only now?! you are just SO GOOD, i think i have my new favourite science channel...:) thank you for your efforts, i appreciate it very much!
Thanks. Welcome aboard!
I was waiting for your thoughts on this topic for a long time.
Great Arvin !!! Thankyou!!!!
You do a great job, Arvin! It is a true joy to watch your presentations.
Could you a take a further step and try to explain the old testament's chapters 38-41 of Job?
These chapters refer to constellations and to their relations either in the future or in an old era.
Could for example monoceros collide (or have collided) with the beehive cluster in cancer? (Job 39:9)
Could "the Pleiades' bond" with Orion be the fact that Orion is always running behind them? (38:31)
Or maybe "the Pleiades' bond" is the fact that all this constellation's stars have the same proper motion (μ)? ..
All Job's chapters look like a theatrical play, with constellations taking the place of characters.. Why?
Could Job also serve as an allusion to past events (or future ones) and people who played (or shall play) a significant role in history?
This is my conclusion reading carefully the descriptions of Sagitarrius depicted as a belligerent man on a horse who smells the war from afar, says to himself "well done" and throughs himself in it, of Dragon depicted as a crocodile, whom God shall drag through a hoop by his nostrils and lips, of the Ostrich depicted as a careless and flighty mother etc.
There are also explicit indications about the earth who remains "glued" near the sun as if by cement mortar (Job 38:38) as well as to the recent theory of invisible walls in space, if one considers "the sea" as an allusion to space and the "gates" and "locks" (38: 8 and 10) as "boundaries" of black matter and black holes respectively, above which the antimatter expands;
This allusion to the space's dual nature as matter and antimatter is more accentuated in Genesis 1: 1, 6 and 7, if we consider the vault as the invisible walls in space, the "water above the vault" as flux of E/M waves of antimatter and the water under the vault as flux of E/M waves of matter.
The "light" and the "darkness" could mean the projection of waves of antimatter into a 3D Higgs space, this projection being done by means of the dark holes taking the place of splits on these "invisible walls", as is the case with the double split experiment, where "light" and "darkness" occur as stripes when a beam of light (a beam of E/M wave) passes through one hole, or as waves when there are two holes. With so many black holes, I guess God did a "million split" experiment and thus created "the sea" of E/M information (and matter) waves, with galaxies at their points of interface!!
Wow!
Back to Job now:
If my guess is right, then "sand" must be time!!
What else could it mean: "I put sand as boundary for the sea and told to the sea: you shall go up to here but no further and your waves shall collide inside you" BUT the fact that every being is restrained by spacetime in 3 dimensions, INSIDE which all other dimensions are folded as if they were waves colliding in this being's earthly boundaries? (chapter 38 : 8-11)..
BTW in Job 38:37 mention is being done about the "tilting" of the sky towards the earth, that being the earth's orbital inclination!!!
But Arvin, please explain genesis 1: 1 and 2!
How else could the earth be formless and without shape, if God created it first along with the sky?
Could he have created just a simulation in the beginning?
How else could earth have produced vegetation without sun, as vegetation came forth on the third day of the creation, whereas the sun was created on the fourth day, if not as a vegetation's simulation?..
Finally: Does chapter 1 paragraphs 9 and 10 of Genesis signify Pangaea!!?
Last remark to comment on Arvin, if you wish, but not least: In Isaiah 33:23 the septuagint tanslation, apparently referring to a ship's mast and sails, reads: "Your mast (or web or tissue) has tilted; it will not damage the sails"..
Since you mentionned the Vela constellation in your video, I thought I should point out that "Vela" means "sails", "ΙΣΤΙΑ" in greek, the official translation's language and the word "IΣΤΟΣ" in greek means either mast, or web, or even tissue in english, but due to this word's (must = IΣΤΟΣ) correlation with the word sails ("IΣΤΙΑ"), we translate "ΙΣΤΟΣ" as "mast", instead of "web" or even "tissue"..
In greek mythology while Jason was sitting on Argo, the argonauts' ship, preserved in the temple of Athena, the ship's mast broke!
So my opinion is that maybe the literal meaning of this passage is an allusion to the greeks as sailors of the world and ultimately of the universe.. (don't laugh, because there are lots of greeks who do "sail in the universe")..
My questions are the following:
1) Is there any possibility the other (not literal) meaning of this phrase to be:
"your web has tilted; it won't damage the vela (constellation)" or "the Vela (supercluster)"?
As you pointed out our galaxy is heading towards the great attractor and the shapley SCL.
So could this be the "tilting" of our (galactic) net (web = ΙΣΤΟΣ) away from the Vela SCL (ΙΣΤΙΑ)?
Another strange coincidence ( maybe an allusion to something?) is that the 70 (72 to be exact) jewish translators used the word
"SAILS" (IΣΤΙΑ) in Exodus 27: 11 - 15 in order to render the relevant hebrew word meaning "covers" (serving as curtains hanging between the pillars of the courtyard), whereas in Exodus 27:16 they used the word "COVER" (KAΛΥΜΜΑ) to render the curtain hanging in front of the courtyard's gate !
2) Could the phrase "(I am) The one who stretched out the sky alone (by myself)" in Job 9:8 be allegorically related to a tensor set in the universe as point of reference?
The participle used in the greek translation is "Ο ΤΑΝΥΣΑΣ", meaning "the one who has tensioned, stretched", like a bird does with its wings, therefore it is called "TANΥΣΙΠΤΕΡΟ" (ΤΑΝΥΖΩ + ΠΤΕΡΑ)..
I know these are stupid questions, but as we know that there is a "cosmic web" consisting of hydrogen and 60% of all existing gases which caused the formation of galaxies (at the points where this cosmic web's waves-streams interface) and that all galaxies are interconnected through "filaments", as happens in a net, I'm just contemplating the chance that this cosmic net or web could one day damage the Vela constellation or its synonymous supercluster..
I would very much appreciate your answer!
It would be great if astronomers did an effort to decode the meaning of some of the old testament's chapters, whith reference to modern inventions and theories. Why not after all?
Especially if someone could try and explain
1) How could it be explained that God always appears as a whirlpool, as a whirling cloud to his chosen ones (numbers 12:5), or as a nebula in fire (Exodus 24:16 - 18) as Jesus will, according to Apocalypse 1:7 , to 1 Thessalonians 4:17 and to Acts 1:11 ?
Could this apparition translate as a "fluorescent plasma", ionization?
2) If the transformation of all beings "at atomic level, at the twinkling of an eye" (Corinthians 1,15:52 "ἐν ἀτόμῳ, ἐν ριπῇ ὀφθαλμοῦ") could occur as "nebulization" of atoms, based on what we know today..
The greek translation says "εν ατομω", that is "at atomic level"! ... and NOT AS elsewhere translated "each one of us";
In this case it should read "ΑΤΟΜΙΚΩΣ" or "ΚΑΘΕΙΣ ΕΞ ΗΜΩΝ"!
There are also several translations that omit the phrase "EN ATOMΩ"..
The correct translation of the old and new testament in greek is here: apostoliki-diakonia.gr/bible/bible.asp?contents=new_testament/contents_E_Paulou_KorinthA.asp&main=E_Paulou_KorinthA&file=3.1.2.15.htm
3) why Jesus's body was shining during his transfiguration on mount Thavor, as Mathew 17:1-8, Luke 9:28-36 and Mark 9:2-8 recount;
Isn't it true that all atoms emit light when an electron changes orbit and falls into a lower one? Could something similar have happened? And if so, could this change of orbit be not only connected with the emission of light, but also with levitation, as Jesus was levitating at that moment?
4) the extraordinary way God appeared in front of David in Β' Bασ 22: 8-17 (Kings B' 22: 8-17).
The link to the greek translation is here: www.imgap.gr/file1/AG-Pateres/AG%20KeimenoMetafrasi/PD/10.%20VasilionB.htm
I don't know which english translation correctly and accurately renders the septuagint, but I wish you good luck in finding one!
Maybe the office of the greek archbishop could help, or this site too : www.biblegateway.com/
I think that for english one should look up the "Complete Jewish Bible" comparing it with the "Orthodox jewish bible" translation.
BTW
Job 38:32 reads: "ἦ διανοίξεις μαζουρὼθ ἐν καιρῷ αὐτοῦ καὶ ῞Εσπερον ἐπὶ κόμης αὐτοῦ ἄξεις αὐτά;"
As the greek septuagint translation has it, using the verb "ΔΙΑΝΟΙΞΕΙΣ", the accurate and literal translation of this passage should be:
"or will you OPEN UP (BREAK OPEN) MAZZAROTH"...
(Mazzaroth is "the constellation" in general and not specifically The great bear)
... "in its time AND HESPERUS "
(Hesperus is the planet Aphrodite) ..
"and lead them upon ITS HAIR?"
My opinion is that passage 32 should refer to the previous passage 31, where God talks about Orion's barrier too, apart from the bond of the Pleiades!
What else could "open up" or "break open", but a barrier?
So passage 32 should mean the "opening" of specifically Orion's barrier in time, and not to any other constellation..
This barrier, impeding Orion from reaching the Pleiades, will break open and the two constellations shall collide.
This is how I see it..
It should further mean Orion's collision with Hesperus, that is Aphrodite (ΔΙΑΝΟΙΞΕΙΣ ΜΑΖΟΥΡΩΘ ΕΝ ΚΑΙΡΩ ΑΥΤΟΥ "KΑΙ ΕΣΠΕΡΟΝ") and their falling upon "Come Berenice's" (KAI EΠΙ ΚΟΜΗΣ ΑΥΤΟΥ ΑΞΕΙΣ ΑΥΤΑ) as there is no other constellation with "hair" (ΚΟΜΗ).
According to greek mythology, Berenice had dedicated (sacrificed) her hair (KOMH) to the godess Aphrodite..
So a reverse sacrifice might happen in the future !!!
As we know from Luke 21:25 - 28 and Matthew 24:29, 30 that the powers of the sky shall be shaken (or shall convulse), I wonder what the astronomers' simulations forecast in the future !
Isaiah 34:4 predicts:
a) the melting of the powers of the sky,
2) the flicking through of the skies like the flicking through of a book ; I have watched documentaries showing a possibly existing multiverse having the form of a book with a spine, this meaning a common origin and the book's pages were opened up, meaning that all possible universes were light years apart from each other.
3) the falling of all stars, like the leaves of vines and the leaves of figs do.
How could all these happen, what could the cause of such catastrophes be?
Thanks in advance for the time taken to read this comment.
Great educational video sir. Really enjoyed this and learned about the new superclusters.
Very interesting and intelligible-the logical extrapolation would seem to be that all matter agglomerates to ever-denser units, until everything disappears into ultra-super-massive "black holes""-(which maybe then explode at "absolute maximum" temperature & pressure, restarting the whole cycle?)
I'm always spaced out on how far into the universe we can already detect and speculate despite the massive distances... 😵❤️
Thank goodness, our lives are so short, that we don't have to worry about collision with any other galaxy or large objects!
Thank you for letting us all know we can sleep soundly at night! 😀 Great video, my friend!!! ❤️💪
Great little video 👍interesting, I think the idea of something massive outside the visible universe is a good theory. We just dont know,but I think that a QC would be able to "extrapolate " what could be causing this draw.
Excellent video so well presented too 👌🏼
Glad you liked it!
Arvin is the school teacher that the kids actually liked
Kids would like going to school if all teachers were like him
15:28 Thank you. Didn't know how I was gonna live the rest of the few billions of my life thinking about it. Now I can sleep peacefully.
Thanks for the great content as always
I love that you answered my question about the great attractor and the expansion of the universe before I could ask it. If I may ask I’ll ask a fringe question. Could this be a primordial black hole that is using galaxies like yo-yo’s?
Thank you for another great video! Arvin, you are wonderful!
Amazing video as always - keep it up
My favorite theory involving dark flow is, There is another universe, outside of our own. At one point we thought that all the bright objects were suns/stars. Then we discovered that they included galaxies. Since then we have found Sagan Units of galaxies, you know, "billions and billions". So why can't there be a universe, out there, in fact Sagan units of universes, just beyond our ability to detect. More massive than our universe. Not strings or dimension, just more rocks on rocks, just like our universe with the same laws of nature. A lot more fun to consider, without all the elegant math getting in the way.
Dark flow is probably not real, just a mistake in the data.
All this shows is that we know nothing and are so very insignificant. We base so many observations on theoretical equations, and if the equations end up being wrong by even a fraction of a percent, everything we think we know is wrong. Right now we say our understanding and equations are backed up by the observations, but realistically we are making it all fit by trying to explain something we neither understand, nor have the technology to truly see.
A great tutorial. Scientific endeavor, the ability to make a living thinking about all this, writing it down, speculating, theorizing, made possible by a world of people farming, processing, transporting, drilling for oil, running steel mills and power plants, making the physical world we know, so that some folks can sit around and ponder things.
Love this Arvin thank you
New information for me in this video. I love this type of mystery. The great attractor seems to be an important clue to the mystery of gravity. Imagine the combined kinetic energy of each of the great attractors your described. The significance of quark and lepton action and interaction to me is mind boggling. Our current understanding of the Higgs field and gluon is currently too limited. As to the cosmological constant dark energy and gravity question, I am fascinated by gravity inside a black hole and the actions of quaks an leptons and the curvature of spacetime or time space and the super colider singularity result measured and superposition states. If the gluon force were extended or a new wave field discovered that extended the strong nuclear force seems to be a possible path to follow. To me I am fascinated by the attractive force proton neutron quark kinetic energy measured state heald together by the gluon wave field superposition state. Amazing!
I can't sleep at night because I'm worried about what's going to happen to us five billion years from now.
Try taking some Dramamine. It might help you sleep. I needed to take some because after watching Arvin’s video I began experiencing motion sickness from hurtling through the universe.
Wonderful presentation. Thank you.
Great Informative video. Also at the end the final note. Not to fear about these they will have no impact on us Or our solar system. At least negative.
In contrast other people usually make it scary, but the fact is not so scary.
By the way Great video, excellent explanation
Great as always
We should also be considering the dimension of time in this discussion. We are moving toward a singularity of time, along a temporal kind of geodesic ... as we do space dilates much like time would in a black hole. The universe is basically a time hole.
We are speeding up as we get to the end of time, which causes the the illusion of accelerating spacial expansion.
Nice
according to E=mc^2 time [past, future] doesn't exist. the speed of light, causality and so called time is all the same. time is light itself. that what you see around yourself is space. according to E=mc^2 space is an illusion [as time it is as well].
E=mc^2 says two mindblowing postulates. the only motion that there is, is the speed of light. however, at the speed of light there is no motion [time] and there is no space. according to E=mc^2 the only frame [reality] that there is, is spacetime where space and time are two virtual [non existing] vectors in this 4d frame. in spacetime your speed is always the speed of light so space and time are both an illusion.
*"People like us, Who believe in Physics know that the distinction between the past, present and future is nothing else but a stubborn human illusion"* Einstein describing spacetime.
there is no past, there is no future............there is no spoon. according to minkowski and einstein [and spacetime] the frames that we call the past, the present and the future are all fused in one single and the same moment called spacetime.
everything what is in the universe ever is happening right here and right now. I know, it's difficult to grasp it, even for me who fully understands the special relativity but it is in this way just like E=mc^2 tells us. now, you can ask like "I see space around me, all of that that you have written is bs". well, your brain cannot depict or better said visualize the 4 dimensional reality. it can hardly visualize the 3 dimensional frame. simirarly a full hd monitor cannot depict the 4k resolution. your brain is a full hd monitor, the reality is the 4k resolution.
Can you explain why the CMB is static, which allows us to see the redshift showing that we are moving? Why isn't the CMB also affected by the Great Attractor? I know it has no mass, but it still has energy and so should be affected by gravitation, no?
The CMB is everywhere. It's like the canvas on a painting. No matter where you look on the painting, the canvas is in the background.
Great explanation!❤
Good video. Thanks for sharing
Hello Mr.Arvin, as always phenomenal video. I recently came across the topic of great attractor and your video just came at perfect time! Also I would like to suggest the video of SEA on this very topic. I am sure you will really like it.
Excellent excellent video…WOW 🤩
Superb explanation. I thought that Virgo cluster was the last word on supermassive clusters. Everything attracts everything else in the universe, yet the universe continues to expand at an accelerated rate of velocity. What can be more mystifying than this! Every space object is in a tearing hurry to get away from its neighbors.
Meh. It’s actually space time that is expanding, and every structure is just floating on top of it, so it “appears” like everything is trying to run away from everything else, but we are actually moving towards the Andromeda galaxy and will collide with it eventually lol. I know you know all this all ready, but forgive me, I’m just flexing my new brain power from the brain implants I bought on EBay last week. I boosted my intelligence to +4 for only $50! What a deal tho
My friend have Dark Flow in his apartment. When sleeping there in night and darkness, a slow flowing of cold air from the old windows is can be felt. This Dark Flow sometimes also brings smell from nearby outhouse.
Thanks, i learnt a lot!