Sister Paxton was my favorite & stole the show for me. She was genuinely bubbly & fun! I've met mormon female missionaries & she was very similar.🙏🥰🌟 Mr. Reed: "With great power, comes great responsibility." Sister Paxton: "Spider-Man!"😂
i haven't watched it, i will watch it. i've watched a lot of reviews of this movie. i liked your review the most, to be honest. i have prejudices about the movie, the first of which is that these missionaries are mormon, which is a red flag for me. if you're going to criticize religion and you're sincere, you do it trough the majority, not the minority. it's also annoying that the hunter is male and the prey is female. being prey is a fate we can't escape, i guess. boys also do missionary work, more than girls. it would be much more interesting if hugh grant's character was a woman.
The villain is the one criticizing religion. It seemed to me the movie was saying how controlling others is evil regardless of what religion someone adheres to. The villian does not accept any religion but control. It wasn't just a simple criticism of mormonism. Additionally, choosing female protagonists was essential, as they naturally project a sense of vulnerability. If the protagonists had been male, the audience might question why they didn’t just fight back.
@@StevenE-l9y ha ha ha you said completely sexist and misogynist things. is fighting back only for men? it's very, very pathetic that you think vulnerability is only for women. as far as i understand, the hugh grant character does not create any intimidation with his physical strength.
@StevenE-l9y of course, control also applies to mormonism. the coward ones, the ones who don't want to get the reaction of the majority, go after minioraty. it's a comedy for someone who is already intimidated to give us a lecture about being intimidated. don't you think?
@StevenE-l9y you said completely sexist and misogynist things. is fighting back only for men? it's very, very pathetic that you think vulnerability is only for women. as far as i understand, the hugh grant character does not create any intimidation with his physical strength.
@@zeynepgulsu1899 It's not sexist to say women project vulnerability more, it's true. A smaller younger woman projects more vulnerability than a fit young male. Women could fight back (and she ultimately does in this movie) but it's more difficult. She needed a weapon. If it were two young men instead people would be thinking "why don't they just kick this old man's ass?" I suppose they could have given grant a gun to balance the scale.
![[LIVE] : ONE ลุมพินี 89 | คู่เอก "ยอดไอคิว vs คิริลล์"](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Z3vYkHJ_5Ig/mqdefault.jpg)
Love discovering your channel. I also love the synonym behind this movie with the board games 🎉
Sister Paxton was my favorite & stole the show for me. She was genuinely bubbly & fun! I've met mormon female missionaries & she was very similar.🙏🥰🌟
Mr. Reed:
"With great power, comes great responsibility."
Sister Paxton: "Spider-Man!"😂
She was adorable! ☺
I loved this film, it was so tense! I agree that the acting was the highlight!
This was the best video on the movie!! Love it
Thank you so much! ☺
i haven't watched it, i will watch it.
i've watched a lot of reviews of this movie. i liked your review the most, to be honest. i have prejudices about the movie, the first of which is that these missionaries are mormon, which is a red flag for me. if you're going to criticize religion and you're sincere, you do it trough the majority, not the minority. it's also annoying that the hunter is male and the prey is female. being prey is a fate we can't escape, i guess. boys also do missionary work, more than girls.
it would be much more interesting if hugh grant's character was a woman.
The villain is the one criticizing religion. It seemed to me the movie was saying how controlling others is evil regardless of what religion someone adheres to. The villian does not accept any religion but control. It wasn't just a simple criticism of mormonism. Additionally, choosing female protagonists was essential, as they naturally project a sense of vulnerability. If the protagonists had been male, the audience might question why they didn’t just fight back.
@@StevenE-l9y ha ha ha you said completely sexist and misogynist things. is fighting back only for men? it's very, very pathetic that you think vulnerability is only for women. as far as i understand, the hugh grant character does not create any intimidation with his physical strength.
@StevenE-l9y of course, control also applies to mormonism. the coward ones, the ones who don't want to get the reaction of the majority, go after minioraty. it's a comedy for someone who is already intimidated to give us a lecture about being intimidated. don't you think?
@StevenE-l9y you said completely sexist and misogynist things. is fighting back only for men? it's very, very pathetic that you think vulnerability is only for women. as far as i understand, the hugh grant character does not create any intimidation with his physical strength.
@@zeynepgulsu1899 It's not sexist to say women project vulnerability more, it's true. A smaller younger woman projects more vulnerability than a fit young male. Women could fight back (and she ultimately does in this movie) but it's more difficult. She needed a weapon. If it were two young men instead people would be thinking "why don't they just kick this old man's ass?" I suppose they could have given grant a gun to balance the scale.