You know what would really be a problem when considering the bible inerrant? The fact that it's a translation, of a translation, of multiple different manuscripts from several different oral traditions... And for some versions of the book that's just the tip of the iceberg of issues... I'd also consider it quite an issue that several things described in the book are scientifically wildly innacurate. And that the book contradicts itself a multitude of times... And that authorship of most of the chapters is unknown or contested. But yea except for those minor issues I can see why someone might consider the book inerrant. If they just choose to disgregard every error that'd be quite easy in fact.
Thank you for continuing to defend the doctrine of inerrancy, Dr.
Thank you for the support!
Thank you!
@@vladimirsylenok789 you’re welcome
You know what would really be a problem when considering the bible inerrant? The fact that it's a translation, of a translation, of multiple different manuscripts from several different oral traditions... And for some versions of the book that's just the tip of the iceberg of issues...
I'd also consider it quite an issue that several things described in the book are scientifically wildly innacurate. And that the book contradicts itself a multitude of times... And that authorship of most of the chapters is unknown or contested.
But yea except for those minor issues I can see why someone might consider the book inerrant. If they just choose to disgregard every error that'd be quite easy in fact.
Wow. Ur deceived.