Yaaa you would be in jail while out abroad and your child would go to Child Haven, and have a good chance of actually being molested by predators held there. Parent of the year material here..
no ... your right let a man grope your child. I am sure that phil and this man @Chris K was being super Cereal about actually taking it to "jail" level of intervention it's called being hyperbolic in reality stepping in and not letting a grown man grope your child whether that child had a disorder or not IS being the better parent in my opinion .... stepping back and doing nothing while your child is groped in public right in front of you as you do nothing to help but possibly bitch aloud that it's wrong ... probably furthering the trauma your child is facing in that moment ESP. a child with that disorder if far more damaging then you being escorted from the building and missing your flight cause you stopped a man from inappropriately touching your kid... even in the case of punching the guy and being taken to jail all that means is the first emergency contact likely @chris K the mother or obviously with phil the mother of trey Lindsay would be the one to take the child and if abroad then the family of the child would figure it out as the child was held with whatever form of child protective services for one night at most would be but certainly not grandpa touchy ... if you cannot see the blatant pedophile in that video then you seem to be doing backflips to protect him from being punched by Chris phil or myself
As a Canadian, the sexualisation of our Prime Minister is extremely embarrassing. It is definitely comparable to that DailyMail front page. I wish people would stop fawning over him and focus on his political impact.
I can understand BuzzFeed doing something like that, because their audience is mostly teenagers. But big outlets like Time, NYT, or WSJ is unacceptable. No teenage girl goes to Time to see Sen. Wilson's "dreamy eyes".
I am apart of my local police explorers and they taught us the right and wrong way to pat someone down. A pen is a part of our uniforms for many reasons, one of them being to check the waste band and pockets of a suspect in case there is some thing like a knife or a syringe in there, it is completely unnecessary and pretty inappropriate to use you finger, and to stick it so far down into this young boys waste band. You are also not supposed to slide you hand, you are suppose to pat, that is why it is call a pat down. (but using the back of the hand on his butt was the only right thing he did)
I work at the TSA and I've got to say that shit was unnecessarily thorough. Also, in Sweden, were I work, you're not allowed to touch anyones genitals or the butt, even with the back of your hands. If the kid was hiding something there the metal alarm would indicate that and the TSA could use the handmetaldetector to verify the source. That grouping was not the right way to handle a random check. Like we TSA workers don't get enough shit already. Use fucking common sense, it's just a kid. Do your job but use your head as well.
Pluto : thats actually true. why couldn't a person do that? if you dont treat everyone that same then people wi cry about profiling. so basically no matter what TSA does someone with be "outraged".
Dude, you are working in Sweden. I can guarantee that you've been trained better than your American counterpart. Most of them literally don't know what they are doing. Same with police: German police training takes about 130 to 150 weeks of training, American police training takes 15 weeks... (and no, I'm not exaggerating) PS: Sorry for my horrendous English, I'm incredibly tired and my language skills are deterioatig as wi speek.
I live in Canada and let me tell you, it is SO annoying when I'm sitting in Economics trying to learn about actual problems going on in our country, and as soon as Justin Trudeau is brought up even my TEACHER goes off on a tangent about how attractive he is. I am in high school, so I get if some of my peers decide to get distracted with their own hormonal thoughts, but someone who is supposed to be teaching us about how sexism in our country (wage gap, etc) is a real problem decides to waste our learning time on something so hypocritical. How on earth can you preach one thing and then completely change narrative when one variable is changed??
Awesome - I'll make sure I put that in the title of every video I do in the future :D. Too late for the 134(ish) I have now, but if it makes you happy I will gladly go and change my titles XD.
Just because men don't get upset about being objectified doesn't mean it a) doesn't exist b) isn't sexist c) isn't equal to women being objectified. Either it's all sexist or none of it is.
I kinda agree with you, Rak. I mean, I completely agree that men are and can be objectified as well, but I'm not sure about the sexism part of it. Sexism and objectification are two different things. Just because you have one doesn't mean the other is present as well. With that in mind and based solely upon what is seen in this video, both the women and the man in the video were objectified, but none of them faced sexism. In the wider world, I agree that sexism and objectification against any gender is wrong, but that women are more often the targets of both and that objectification of men is seen as more socially acceptable than the reverse due to our culture.
Blow-Up Bunny given the higher rate of suicide of men id have to disagree with you, i think sexism against men just happens in ways that are more easily dismissed
1:24 "Rubbing down the legs but it's not creepy it's back-of-the-hand stuff" 1:27 "Then I'm not sure what the point of back-of-the-hand stuff was cuz then it's the front of the hands grope-y stuff" Literally the best part of the video
I've had a pat down from the TSA multiple times because I travel in and out of the USA a lot, but it has never looked like that. That video made me want to vomit, horrifying.
Renae H Touch would suggest something different. But yes, they can do everything in their power to make sure you are not concealing something around an area that humans typically do, for obvious reasons. Most to.es that simply involves brushing with the hand. I don't know what people want. People don't want profiling so everyone has to be treated the same. Even mentally challenged kids. That is a standard patdown for law enforcement.
Cat are you mental, no they do not all that would happen is that they would get another woman to Pat her down and it will be just as invasive as another man patting down another man
do parents need to carry cards that say "hey my kid is different" to convince people not to traumatize these kids? With all these ways of screening they had to do something that would potentially hurt this kid. What if the touch was processed as pain? Then you're hurting the poor kid. Even if that wasn't the TSA intention the fact that the kid is feeling pain is horrible. shame on TSA. Shame. Shame. Shame. *rings a bell*
buzzfeed are probably better haha, wasnt it the daily mail that wikipedia classed as an unreliable source... wikipedia?! that's the state of UK journalism
I had an identical pat down by TSA at Logan airport a little over a month ago. I felt very uncomfortable as an 18 y/o male, I can't imagine this poor kid.
I know that empathy is a learned skill, but I feel like you would do well to practice it more. May be you're having a bad day, I don't know you. I just don't feel that calling someone a bitch for being uncomfortable with being pat down is a measured response.
Any search is uncomfortable for me as well. I only had my front pockets patted because I'd missed a couple of coins when emptying my pockets and it was really weird with that same slow, very gentle bordering on caressing touch from the TSA guy. I honestly think they're trained in that particular motion as it is very disarming and awkward, but in a way that you can't really put your finger on as to why you find it is offensive. Probably because it's unnatural for almost any other situation in life. I don't think he was trying to feel me up, he was just doing his job, and had tons of witnesses right there who would be on my side if he had because the TSA has a horrible reputation. People need to cut the guy some slack and stop calling him a pedo. He'd have to be the worlds stupidest pedo to be actively feeling the kid up while on camera and in front of live witnesses. Shame on Phil for suggesting the guy is a pedo and going along with the outrage machine.
I get this every time through TSA. why? because I have medication that can't go thru x-ray. they check that, drug screen the items, then pat me down including pulling my pants out to look inside at my under garments, touch around my breasts, run their hands (back, so it's ok -.-) over my nipples, and run it over the front of my vagina.They cup my butt and boobs and I have had them look in between my toes. Then there's my husband who gets thru with 2 lighters and a knife. It's gotten to the point in the past where my HUSBAND has said it makes him uncomfortable and asked them to stop. By the way, this is after I went thru (and passed) the regular and handheld metal detector plus I have 3 different doc notes. It's extremely uncomfortable and for me, more often than not, painful.
UR PROBLEM SEEM TO BE WAY TOO complicated and specific i hope u get better but cant u just pass for half second under the x-ray every-time u travel which like atleast once every couple of month ???
I live in the Bay Area and fly down to LA regularly for specialist appointments at UCLA medical neurology. I am in a wheelchair, and cannot go through the scanning process because, ya know, wheelchairs are metal and millimeter waves don't work. I have to go through this EXACT pat down twice every trip, and while I understand that the TSA needs some better protocols for able-bodied individuals, I do believe that pat downs are a necessary. People need understand that no one gets a freebie because they pass the eye test. If the TSA officer did anything wrong, it was if he didn't ask the boy and his mom if he would feel more comfortable if he did the pat down in private, where the mom could be with the son.
When it comes to objectification of men and women, it should be all genders or none. It's hypocritical to say it's bad when woman are specialized but not men, and vice versa. People honestly need to pick a side, for or against it, period.
I feel like buzzfeed is just trying to get views and that is why they're using those "clickbait" headlines and pictures. But using sexist titles like that really grinds my gears because you cant say that you are fighting for justice between both genders, and then do the exact thing you're fighting against for one of the genders.
My Mother was visiting her Sister in Florida(she was Canadian). They both got in a car accident and my Mother broke her hip, she was over 60 at the time. Because the healthcare system is so expensive in the USA, they sent a nurse to bring her back to Canada. On her way through customs, the TSA made her stand for half her pat down and then made her walk through the metal detector along with everyone else. The nurse demanded to assist her through but they would not allow it since there were handrails she could hold on to... He literally had to catch her on the other side as she could no longer hold her own weight. GG TSA! PS Trudeau is a douche.
To everyone saying that Trudeau isn't being objectified or that it "doesn't count", that's stupid. Both men and women are objectified and I, for one, support neither. You can't be ok with one and not ok with the other.
The outcries for women being sexualised are valid, but hypocritical at the same time. It's been happening for years. Look up any article on the Fappening. It on;y talks about how women were the victim. Women are being treated like objects. Yet, there was a picture of Matt Smith's dong front and center as well. Or with Paige from the WWE. Everything is "how dare someone violate her privacy like this." But practically no one mentions that an equally famous Male wrestler, Xavier Woods, is in one of the videos with her. Were his right not violated just because her rights were? And where is the line supposed to be drawn? A Prime Minister cannot be sexualised, but David Beckham can? Chris Evans can? For people to even begin to think that men don't get sexualized CONSTANTLY is baffling.
On point. But what baffels me even more is that people seem to think that calling someone attractive takes away from their orher skills/attributes. Like calling a comedic actor/actress attractive doesnt make them less funny or talented. And calling a poltician attractive doesnt make them any less powerful either.
Thats something that ALWAYS bugs me, is i see women being pissed at being objectified but those same women are objectifying these stars. And the things they say are super sleazy, but dont you dare call them out on it. I dont know.. hypocrisy is a tricky thing to deal with.
accidentprown the supernatural fanbase drives me nutz uggh the show is so good tho..its crazy tho cuz alot of my guy friends dont watch it but girls i know who arent into the premise or even fantasy anything(tlc/mobsters wives type of show viewers) love the show..i dunno its just weird..
The TSA is definitely a waste. They are frustrating and annoying because they take forever to do anything, and yet they do not accomplish anything. And the fact that they have a 5% success rate, nope nope nope. My grandfather literally left his pocket knife in his carry on, and they didn't find it. And this pocket knife was very big, not some tiny little thing. If the TSA actually accomplished something and helped us, then I wouldn't be angry. But the fact that they are invading the privacy of other people without actually saving us from dangers, no no nope. This is so ridiculous.
Monkacornoo! How much experience do you have with TSA? I've flown 3 times in the last few years, all international, and I was through very quickly with everything. My belt even set off an alarm the first time I flew and got a big pat down. Wasnt offended.
I'm Canadian. I hate when the news just reports on Trudeau that way (especially coming from other countries news). I do think its probably worse for female politicians. In the democratic primaries Bernie always looked like someones dad dressed Larry David. He wore a ski jacket to the inauguration too and no one flipped out like they did about Hillary's suits.
hi, I'm an actual TSA agent at ft.lauderdale ,and I can shed some light on this. see, I had to do a pat down on a kid once. it was a regular every kind of day, when this kids mom asked if her child could forgo the standard pat down,much like the mother in this story. she didn't feel comfortable with her child being searched and didn't see the need for it, but unfortunately we have rules to follow. much to her dismay we had to pay down her child. the woman was in histerics, screaming "YOU FUCKING PIGS" and caused a huge scene at the gate. I personally felt awful, but I had a job to do. Her husband tried calm her down after we told them we'd have to have them removed if they continued like this. they eventually calmed down and we proceeded to conduct a pat down on the 12 year old boy. I felt gross doing it, and I was just trying to get it over with. but when I was patting him down around his upper thighs, I felt something. something long and thick. "WHAT ARE YOU DOING TO MY SON? YOU SICK FUCK ILL KILL YOU" his mom yelled as I started stroking this long cylindrical object in the boys pants. the boy started looking nervous, tears in his eyes, but those tears didn't phase me. I knew what I had to do. suddenly I shoved my hand down the boys pants. shock and yelling over took the scene. every one out raged. the parents furious, frothing at the mouth yelling red in the face, my colleagues confused and worried. on Lookers gasped, some yelling "Fuck pigs!" others in tears. suddenly, I remove my hand from the boys pants, and in my hand, a stick of dynamite. a gasp overtakes the crowd. the parents now wide eyed and quite. I then remove the boys mask to reveal, Nosferatu. "not this time Nosferatu, your reign of terror ends now" "drats, curse you TSA and your intuitive security measures! I should have known better than to mess with America's elite security agency!" the parents were appearantly vampire servant slaves that were in on it. we garlic sprayed all three of them just for good measure, and locked them up immediately. every one clapped, and lives were saved. this is just an every day thing for TSA. so as a fellow TSA agent, I don't fault this man, because that small child could totally be a vampire lord with dynamite in his pants.
Personally as someone who has Learning Differences I would be absolutely livid If I saw the TSA doing this to someone who struggles with sensory input especially a child.
Dylan You're right it's a learning difference that people are born with. It can also be a side effect of several other learning differences, but to a lesser extent.
Dylan It is a disorder not a disease. Look up the difference. That said, it is a very REAL disorder that my child has. It isn't even a "learning difference" as another sated. It is a disorder that affects the processing of sensory stimuli. My son went through over 2 years of occupational therapy and cognitive behavior therapy plus 6 months of social skills class before being discharged from the specialist. This was done through our local children's hospital. Please learn more before claiming something "isn't real". You have no idea the toll this takes on a family as a whole.
NO, Phil, you are NOT being "too hard on the TSA agent". Because SPD does NOT just mean you have "difficulties processing information" ... because those difficulties typically animate/result in pain, confusion, even nausea and delirium. Sensory Processing Disorder can mean that you process things less, but for many it is not that simple. Can you imagine being a 12-year old boy getting a pat down, while every time they touch you it feels like what nails on a chalk board sounds/feels like, except on your skin, on every inch of your skin for every moment there's contact? What they did to that child is DESPICABLE and DISGUSTING
I disagree - It doesn't seem to me like this calls for anger at that specific TSA agent, as it seems like he's just following procedure. Now, whether you agree with that procedure or not is a different story, and you can get mad at the TSA itself for its rules, but to throw your anger at this guy would be shooting the messenger in my opinion.
Male or Female, all 3 PMs were objectified. The difference is that (in politics) men benefit from it while women are held back by it. Which is why Trudeau's team propagated and encouraged the "Hot JT" stories all through the campaign and continue to do so now. Nobody just "found" or even went looking for pics of young Trudeau. Those were disseminated to various news outlets by his staff. Meanwhile, the female PMs have spent their entire career trying to avoid these kinds of articles, but they still pop up, completely uninvited.
I don't think there's anything wrong with people talking about how attractive people in the public eye are. Just so long as it doesn't get told as "news". Keep that shit on the gossip sites.
I totally agree. When a male leader is looked at as "good looking" or "hot," people want to listen more. Whereas if a woman is looked at as "good looking" or "having nice legs," people tend to not take them seriously.
Michael Makoa the easiest example is Sarah Palin. She said a fair amount of dumb things, but conservatives had no problem with that. Then she wears one dress that is kinda tight, and suddenly the majority of her own political party said, "I just can't take a hussy like that seriously." I've also seen it with many female politicians that run for Senate, Congress or local gov't. If they are under 45 and even SLIGHTLY attractive, their critics claim they are just in politics for attention, the only reason people vote for them is because they're "hot", they obviously didn't earn their position, they have no idea what hard work is because attractive women don't have to work for anything, etc. The current mayor of my hometown is doing a better job than any of the last 3 mayors before her. But she's decent looking for her age (43), so the news papers still run editorials about how she "uses her feminine whiles" to trick the city council into doing things. (Even though she only ever wears these huge, over-sized, boxy, unflattering pantsuits) And I've also seen it first hand in both school and the professional work force. If a woman is even somewhat attractive, there are always a few assholes who assume she got the job/promotion/grade because the boss/teacher wants to bang them. Or if the boss/teacher is also a woman, then the assholes will say that the attractive girl obviously manipulated a man into doing her work for her. And those few assholes just keep spreading the rumors regardless of how they are disproven. TL:DR- there are many examples in politics, work and school.
Michael Makoa Well, you can't really dictate what people can or can't say about public figures because it would go against free speech. But you can call people out for spreading BS. And if enough people call it out, then maybe these newspapers/blogs/whatever will lose credibility and business. So maybe the public can enforce accountability where the gov't cannot. But that's just a short term reaction to a long term problem. People don't just suddenly develop double standards the day they turn 18. Those are bad habits that are taught and reinforced throughout childhood. We need to be teaching the new generations about personal responsibility. About acknowledging a person's merits and not using lame excuses (like physical appearance) to invalidate their achievements or potential. And people are always going to disagree on things. But we need to teach kids the difference between a good argument (logic/reason/proof) and the bullshit fallacies that people usually use as arguments. I'm just another person on the Internet, so I can't claim to have all the answers. But maybe these 2 approaches would be a good start.
Much like you, if that were my child, I'd either be shot or in jail... to me nothing is worse than hurting a child because it's not just a moment- they're destroyed for life, notwithstanding, having done my grad studies in clinical psych, I'm absolutely appalled and the APA needs to get on this. That "pat down" was disgusting, the child has SPD, and the asshat agent knew that; I hope she makes a civil suit because for a child with SPD that would have been emotionally and physically devastating.
Wow that video just disgusts me! I've been felt up pretty invasively while going though TSA before and I know how I feel as a grown adult. I can't imagine how that kid felt. SMH!!
I am begging you to address the missing Black and Latina girls in DC. There are 22 missing girls within this MONTH, most of them under 18, and I feel like NO ONE is talking about it. Everyone refuses to address it. It's distressing and scary. How does a nation ignore 22 missing children?
Holy fuck I couldn't even watch that video without feeling sick. I'm with you, Phil. If someone was touching my niece, the light of my life, like that, I'd be on the no fly list and my pilots license revoked.
The objectification of both men and women is a fact and equally unacceptable. What difference there is lies in that, historically, men have had more agency than women, and so have been able to maintain and enjoy a measure of respect even when objectified. But on a normal day the objectification of women is typically more dangerous for women's safety-in a moment of spontaneity, an average man can overpower an average woman, while the reverse is not as likely to be true. This is why it's perceived as being "worse" for women-because objectification of a person is dehumanization, and dehumanization of a person ultimately results in a lack of respect, and when you have no respect for a person, does it matter who does what to them or when? But neither men nor women should dismiss or marginalize objectification, as the unfettered objectification of either sex undermines the progression of society as a whole.
As a woman, I hate how much buzzfeed objectifies men. But when it comes generally to Justin Trudeau, a lot of articles were written because individual people were talking about how 'hot' he was, and a lot of focus on that was his muscles when he was not wearing clothing. When it's individual people making these statements, I'm not really against it. But the daily mail is an organisation (I live in the uk and I hate that they're still on the shelves, they're RIDICULOUSLY sexist) and they were commenting on something COMPLETELY unrelated to the massive issue at hand, the Scottish referendum. These two women are our leaders in the UK, they deserve respect and after so much systematic sexism in our country I can't believe that in 2017 this still happens. Oppression of men just doesn't work in the same way due to historical context (still ew to buzzfeed though), and I hope the daily mail goes bankrupt soon or something.
want to know my thoughts on the TSA? In 2015 I flew to Alaska and had a layover in Seattle. Being it was 5 hours, I stepped outside with my then 5 month old son to walk and get some fresh air. We went back through TSA and I was selected for a pat down. They gave me a very condescending attitude when they found out my son and I were flying solo (husband was already at the destination) and I was given a VERY touchy pat down. My son was in his carrier and crying while that happened. I don't think I need to describe how humiliated I felt walking out of a secluded room fixing my outfit and struggling with a baby and rushing to grab my luggage and be on my way. TSA is bullshit and if that had been my son getting such an invasive pat down, I'd be tackling someone.
I'm Canadian and when I'm traveling I won't even get on a flight that stops over in the US on my way to my final destination. I also won't drive across the boarder. I would love to go to Burning Man and a few other events in the states, but to me it's not worth it the way US officials treat people.
Canada still struggles with aboriginal rights, its real estate is being bought up by Chinese billionaires. And let's not forget that your country produced Justin Bieber, a kid so sick with "affluenza," that the only cure is a bullet. The point is, no country is perfect. If you justify your hate by the actions of US officials, then you might as well leave your own country as well, go live in Antarctica.... and it's spelled borders, by the way, not "boarders."
LOL, so you mean before that he was a real classy kid? I doubt it. In any case, the point was that it's pretty silly to not even enter the air space of US just because of US officials. Every country has its flaws.
My mother recently flew through Dallas and was also harassed and treated very rudely by their TSA agents. She has a stoma, basically an internal colostomy bag, as a result of bladder surgery and carries her medical information on her at all times. Despite this she was forced through multiple pat downs and basically treated like a criminal because the agents were convinced that she doesn't have an artificial bladder, but was instead attempting to smuggle something onto the plane.
regarding the TSA news : when a person has a disability, you don't just go and force them to do what they "can't Do". mental, psychological and neurological disabilities must be taken as serious as the physical disabilities. it's just like forcing a person on a wheelchair to stand, walk, and jump.
My mom is on a cane and TSA made her stand without it for an extended period of time for a pat down once, despite the pain it put her through. They're trash about these things.
Siobhan NiGhuairim pardon me if I didn't fully understand your point. but that is exactly what I'm trying to say. mental or psychological disabilities most of the times can't be seen by others, unlike physical disabilities ( only felt by the patient) that is why there must be specific regulations special to those people in need.
I recently got a pat down just like this because I had a walking boot. They lifted my shirt to check my waist band, which I was absolutely not comfortable with. Then, when we were flying back home we found out they took away our TSA pre approval with no warning or word about it.
Id say if he scanned the boy one time pretty "intimately" It would be bad but not as bad, the fact that he went back and forth several times not only on the armpits and sholders but on his legs aswell is very disturbing.
My main issue between the PM's Legs debate vs. 'Pm Steal yo' girl' is that the title of the Daily Mail article is literally stating "Completely disregard what these women are meeting to discuss, and instead focus on their bodies" as opposed to just images of young Justin. If there was an article of "Look how hot young Theresa May is" I wouldn't have an issue with that at all. There may be articles disregarding Justin Trudeau's policies in favour of his looks but I'm only going from the ones in this video. If I saw one I'd likely disagree with that too. (Or is the title 'PM Steal Yo' Girl' doing just that?)
re: The Justin Trudeau thing, It's super weird to see people in other nations reducing your political leader to some weird sexualized version of himself. As not great as Harper was, at least people tended to take us seriously on an international scale because he was old and frumpy. But seriously, every time I scroll past one of those articles I can't help but cringe. It's weird and super uncomfortable as a Canadian to see all this weird hype about his appearance (NOT TO MENTION the weird reaction to thr ivanka trump pictures during that US visit. I mean c'mon. He's married with kids.)
IN REGARDS TO THE TSA VIDEO: as someone who doesn't fly very often (i maybe fly at least once maybe twice a year) i didn't really see the cause for that much outrage. while i do not agree with the TSA not modifying their procedure to better accommodate a person with a disability or even an age appropriate modification, i was always under the impression that this kind of pat down was "by the books". i am well aware that when it comes to underage children, you have to be very careful as to what they are subjected to especially if they are your child .i would never want my underage family members to be subjected to anything that is deemed inappropriate. it's just that from the video i have seen, it seemed like the child was calm and the TSA agent conducted himself in a seemingly professional manner. perhaps this is my ignorance to checking in to flights, but this is just something i felt i needed to type. i might get flamed for this so do your worst.
the main difference between trudeau and the dailymail story, I believe, is that women are WAY more likely to be treated as 'not important' or 'not serious' in their careers because of their looks than men. A man can be heralded as a heartthrob and still be taken seriously. Women historically, and currently, are treated with less respect in their careers for this. Whereas trudeau faces next to zero backlash for it. Equality is important, but the differences need to be acknowledged.
I have a bit of a weird line with regards to the sexism. To me the reason the Daily Mail article is an issue is the picture is taken from a meeting of the two leaders to discuss serious issues, namely whether Brexit will result in Scotland leaving the UK. It's a serious matter being discussed by two very powerful people. If it were a more general thing, like articles about how attractive someone finds Nicola Sturgeon, I would have less of a problem with it. Similarly if the Trudeau articles were comparing how well he wears a suit vs Obama at a world summit or something, I would have an issue. They're there to conduct serious business. I know it's a bit of a weird line, but for me trivializing the work these leaders do is where it gets sexist and objectifying.
This makes sense -- if you just randomly had an article somewhere that says "Doesn't this person look nice?", that's (imo) fine, but if instead of covering something important (what someone is doing/saying) you ignore that in favour of their looks, you're communicating that how they look is more important than what they were doing/saying. (On the other hand, that could be perceived as a compliment: "Sure that stuff was important, but they look _that_ good!")
In my opinion if someone is good looking they're good looking how is that sexist? Not only that but it's not like that's all the article discussed. Headlines get peoples heads turning and articles read, plain and simple. It's about headlines not sexism.
Ian Morris exactly, it's not the fact that they "objectify" him. He's still seen as a individual, capable, powerful AND hot, he's not reduce only to his looks. On the other hand when is the female you have the opposite, she's objectified when only seen as an sexual being (or just an object for pleasure) without consideration for her as a individual with all of what that means. The question is: from where are they look at? Does the sexist stand only perceives them like subjects (or objects) of desiree or as capable and autonomous individuals?
anotsofungirl true, i mean in the end no matter how much we hate it , a double standard does exist, u say that Justin Trudeau is hot and it prolly works in his favour but when they say certain female P.M has great legs then u just end up belittling her and her position and the mass thinks more about that then checking to see whether the person is actually capable or not
TSA is terrible. I've worked in airports and it is a joke. That pat down while yes pat downs there is no reason for having a pat down unless something is registered when going through the detectors. No reason for that sort of pat down on a child.
I think Phil really did a good job hitting on both of these examples of sexism/objectification in the media. They are two extremely similar situations but only one is getting attention or being attacked. Thanks for pointing out an internal bias. I really didn't think "WTF?!" after seeing the second headlines, but it is the exact same situation. This is something I'll need to stop and think about before siding with someone in these situations. If equality is the goal, we can't have double standards - either it is acceptable to sexualize/objectify a person or it is not.
This sort of thing is everywhere, once you start looking for it. The worst I've heard is a friend getting laughed out of a police station for being raped by a woman (He's a guy). Apparently blackmail and emotional torture don't matter if you get it up.
+MrKosman123 Don't think it matters - the individual should always be respected no matter what you think their preferences will be. +WirlWind Holy shit that's terrible, not sure what the US equivalent of the IPCC (Independent Police Complaints Commission) is but I hope it was at least reported. I really feel for your friend, I can't imagine how that must feel. :(
You are not being too harsh. It is ABSOLUTELY ridiculous. I flew through two very small airports while I was 25 weeks pregnant. I was told it was safe to fly, but to avoid the full body scanners since there are no long term studies on the effects, especially in pregnant women. When I asked to not use the scanner, I was met with eye rolls and demeaning talk about how I was being overly cautious. Yeah? Well then why do you have to wear badges that detect radiation? I was invasively patted down by a female agent while two creepy male agents watched. They do the search up both legs until they "meet resistance." In other words until her hand was so far up my crotch she couldn't go any further. It was embarrassing and demeaning. TSA is power tripping and ineffective.
Amanda Young LMFAO. No one in tsa wears badges that detect radiation are you getting your info from fox? 😂😂😂also the scanner is 1000 times less dangerous than having a cell phone call. So you look stupid for asking for a pat down but it's your choice, don't complain that YOU went with the more invasive option. 😂🤷🏼♀️
All I saw was a guy doing his job. The TSA confistated 6000 weapons in 2016 alone. Thousands of drugs too. If kids get a free pass then people will use kids to smuggle shit. People sew drugs into clothing, even their skin hence why they do the caress pat down to see if there are bumps in the person's skin or clothing.
I am Canadian, and I have friends who voted for Trudeau in the last election because he is attractive. If that isn't sexist, I don't know what is. Don't get me wrong, I think he is a decent Prime Minister, and ran a good campaign, voting for someone based on their attractiveness is a problem.
When I was 13 I was separated from my family at the airport and pat down in an extreme way like that. I don't have any kind of sensory disorders, but it was still an awful experience, and it's disgusting that years later this stuff is still happening.
The daily mail outrage is just eye rolling. Its so clear they only did that because they knew it would cause controversy. They are doing it to gain traction. Remember the business saying "Any attentions good attention, weather it makes me look like an ass" Seriously just don't give them the satisfaction of even caring about it. Its just dumb news.
It's weird. I'm as liberal as they come, but I definitely agree there's a gray area. It seems to me that news articles are over-exaggerating the smallest details to try and get people reading articles to get the drama rolling. However, if my friends asked me if I ate a bag of dicks and replied "No comment", they'd think I'm as straight as a broken treebranch, so In other words; I think the government is scared of admitting it's sexuality :D. More seriously, I think that the government is hiding something that could make the public go irrationally nuts... personally the public to me is pretty dumb, including myself... and it's just because we're misinformed and lack the facts. So maybe they're hiding something that's not too bad of a problem because it'd make people riot over nothing ... or it's immense and could have a serious impact on us. If they are hiding something though, I have not the slightest clue to what it is. But to be completely honest, I think this all is just a bunch of House of Cards and we should focus on other, more important problems in our world.... like how I only have $14.55 for a game that costs $15
I'm starting to get the feeling that the trump administration wants to provoke the lefties and liberals by behaving this way. To answer no comment in this situation is just odd. The tax return is also another thing, why would trump refuse to show it when the figures showed he actually didn't have to hide it. Maybe he's trying to set up a trap to embarrass the media, who knows.
I am a professional truck driver. When TSA was created, we had to go thru a TSA background check, mind you at a 1 time 85 dollar fee. After they realized how much money they were getting, they changed the rules and now made it a mandatory background check every 5yrs when you have to renew your Class A license! At a new fee of 95 dollars and again go thru a waiting period of up to 2 months before you are cleared! What a joke
Regardless of how sexist or disrespectful objectifying Justin Trudeau is, the daily mail article is still sexist. At worst, they are both sexist, but comments on Justin Trudeau have no effect on the Daily mail article. The only relevance between the two is if someone claimed one is ok but the other is not. Assuming both are equally disrespectful, that would be hypocritical. However, I think the fact that they are equal is very much up for debate.
Hey Phil, I really agree with you on the whole equality for both sexes in terms of objectification. Being from Scotland, I can say that when Nicola Sturgeon lost a little weight and changed her appearance it was all that UK media wanted to talk about her for. Her predecessor, Alex Salmond, didn't face nearly this amount of sexism. While you say "we shouldn't take the Daily Mail seriously" I totally agree but I can say that there are many people across the UK who pick up the Sun or the Daily Mail newspaper and read it as their legitimate news source. From my point of view, women are far more subject to this sexism in politics but I agree that we have to fight the battle for both sexes. I am proud that in Scotland 3/5 main party political leaders are women and that 4/5 consider themselves LGBT. Tackling sexism in the media is essential to tackling sexism overall.
I'm sick of picking sides. I'm sick of both the right & the left. But than if you don't fall in line with either side you're than shamed upon and deemed for letting the other side win. Can't we just come together as a whole and have it just be us?
We can't "come together" as long as people have different opinions on how our lives can be improved. On a side note, part of the reason Bernie did so well (and Trump but not as much) is because people are tired of choosing a side. Grouping opinions into two groups is never a good idea, but is unavoidable.
It's good to be idealistic, but you have to be realistic as well. The world isn't United, it's easier to hate on people than to try and compromise. Don't pick a side if you don't want to, but then when things happen despite you, you're just going to have to go along with it.
Drewsefer89 Listen to the new podcast s-town. I agree with the clockmaker. The us will deteriorate into autonomous regions with some self sustaining modern societies, and others will be fucking hell holes.
Drewsefer89 it's called being a moderate, you're not alone dude😂 more than half the country is a moderate too. America is just fucked and we have to face it.
You're being a bit idealistic. It's not possible for us to "come together." People will always have opinions that differ from someone one else. What we need to do is try to understand the other side and understand that they are just trying to do what they think is best. That is assuming that we all have the facts and data.
As someone who has studied the full body scanners that TSA uses (BTW they can save your photos hence why i refuse to go through the scanners) I request pat downs every time i go through security. And even though I disagree with the TSA policies nothing that man did was out of norm, first they slide their hands down your back and front and yes they have to check the genital area. Is it weird to see an old man perform this on a child? Yes, but this man is just doing his job and i bet that 2 min was probably more uncomfortable for him than anyone else.
Desmond Saisitthidej but isn't it a little unprofessional to have an older man check a younger male I feel that they should have a specialist or someone more on the younger side
There is absolutely no difference between objectification of males and objectification of females. I've heard people preach about this saying that woman are objectified and then two minutes later talking about how hot this or that guy is. If we wish to reach gender equality we must recognize that objectification is not a one way street but rather a coin. Reminds me of the "you can't be racist to white people" argument.
I think its incredibly sexiest that all the daily mail seems cares about the prime ministers legs! our country is going through a major change this week yet they are not taking it seriously, all they care about is the way people look, its setting a terrible example to SO many people! I understand how you can relate it to the Canadian prime minster but all the things about him are mostly in magazines and online but as you said the daily mail is one of the biggest news papers in the UK! they should be talking about things that matter like how Brexit is going to affect the relationship between England and Scotland, not how the prime ministers look! It should be about how they are acting.
I'd love to know your thoughts on these stories. Especially that first one. I don't know if its just me, but it seems so ridiculous and creepy to me.
Philip DeFranco check ur format dude
very creepy
always fantastic
What a creep
Philip DeFranco You check the area once and move on. Jeez.
I'd be in jail too if that was my son. that woman has some incredible restraint.
Yaaa you would be in jail while out abroad and your child would go to Child Haven, and have a good chance of actually being molested by predators held there. Parent of the year material here..
no ... your right let a man grope your child. I am sure that phil and this man @Chris K was being super Cereal about actually taking it to "jail" level of intervention it's called being hyperbolic in reality stepping in and not letting a grown man grope your child whether that child had a disorder or not IS being the better parent in my opinion .... stepping back and doing nothing while your child is groped in public right in front of you as you do nothing to help but possibly bitch aloud that it's wrong ... probably furthering the trauma your child is facing in that moment ESP. a child with that disorder if far more damaging then you being escorted from the building and missing your flight cause you stopped a man from inappropriately touching your kid... even in the case of punching the guy and being taken to jail all that means is the first emergency contact likely @chris K the mother or obviously with phil the mother of trey Lindsay would be the one to take the child and if abroad then the family of the child would figure it out as the child was held with whatever form of child protective services for one night at most would be but certainly not grandpa touchy ... if you cannot see the blatant pedophile in that video then you seem to be doing backflips to protect him from being punched by Chris phil or myself
J Hauptmann your comment is cringy
they should file for sexual assault of a minor. disgusted by the crotch groping
As a Canadian, the sexualisation of our Prime Minister is extremely embarrassing. It is definitely comparable to that DailyMail front page. I wish people would stop fawning over him and focus on his political impact.
That One TH-cam Commenter He needs to grow a beard or mustach. He's too handsome/distracting.
TSA- theater security Association
"Hey look, I found a terrorist!"
-said no TSA agent ever.
Iambic Pentameter lol
Iambic Pentameter lol
Grandpa "Can you keep a secret" made me spill my coffee thanks Phil!
That was extremely creepy and uncomfortable to watch. If he went through the detector just fine, why was the pat down even necessary?
OliverFiles there have been accidental "detections" at the detector and vise versa
OliverFiles Because he gave the TSA agent a chubb.
Juan Tamad His mother said that did not happen. it was purely a 'random' search
I hate the Daily Mail on so many levels.
I lost it when he said " The dirt grandpa was free styling that boy" 😂
Barlas same haha
i lost it when he said grandpa groups a-lot
"Britain's not the only thing I wanna separate" Got me
"grandpa can he keep a secret" cracked me up the most xD
I can understand BuzzFeed doing something like that, because their audience is mostly teenagers.
But big outlets like Time, NYT, or WSJ is unacceptable. No teenage girl goes to Time to see Sen. Wilson's "dreamy eyes".
I am apart of my local police explorers and they taught us the right and wrong way to pat someone down. A pen is a part of our uniforms for many reasons, one of them being to check the waste band and pockets of a suspect in case there is some thing like a knife or a syringe in there, it is completely unnecessary and pretty inappropriate to use you finger, and to stick it so far down into this young boys waste band. You are also not supposed to slide you hand, you are suppose to pat, that is why it is call a pat down. (but using the back of the hand on his butt was the only right thing he did)
It actually is 2 fingers in the waistband and a sliding motion. The guy did do much more than was needed though.
You know little to nothing.
@@chickenandgrits1 do you have nothing better to do in life? My comment is 5 years old, I don’t even remember writing.
Old man: "So you come here often" *Slowly fingers along the pants*
Pixelated Cloud I
Pixelated Cloud I'm going to hell because this made me chuckle
What do we have here? 👺🍆
Captain Oveur: "Joey, do you like movies about gladiators?"
Pixelated Cloud unfortunately that may not be too far off the truth in the coming weeks
I work at the TSA and I've got to say that shit was unnecessarily thorough. Also, in Sweden, were I work, you're not allowed to touch anyones genitals or the butt, even with the back of your hands. If the kid was hiding something there the metal alarm would indicate that and the TSA could use the handmetaldetector to verify the source. That grouping was not the right way to handle a random check. Like we TSA workers don't get enough shit already. Use fucking common sense, it's just a kid. Do your job but use your head as well.
LexyK ISIS could have hidden plastic explosives in his gooch.
Pluto : thats actually true. why couldn't a person do that? if you dont treat everyone that same then people wi cry about profiling. so basically no matter what TSA does someone with be "outraged".
Pluto : Exactly, if this story is the reason they stop checking people with mental disorders they will just become a target for terrorists to use.
lawl gooch
Dude, you are working in Sweden. I can guarantee that you've been trained better than your American counterpart. Most of them literally don't know what they are doing.
Same with police: German police training takes about 130 to 150 weeks of training, American police training takes 15 weeks... (and no, I'm not exaggerating)
PS: Sorry for my horrendous English, I'm incredibly tired and my language skills are deterioatig as wi speek.
I live in Canada and let me tell you, it is SO annoying when I'm sitting in Economics trying to learn about actual problems going on in our country, and as soon as Justin Trudeau is brought up even my TEACHER goes off on a tangent about how attractive he is. I am in high school, so I get if some of my peers decide to get distracted with their own hormonal thoughts, but someone who is supposed to be teaching us about how sexism in our country (wage gap, etc) is a real problem decides to waste our learning time on something so hypocritical. How on earth can you preach one thing and then completely change narrative when one variable is changed??
I'm a simple man, I see someone shit talk the Daily Mail, I press like
Awesome - I'll make sure I put that in the title of every video I do in the future :D. Too late for the 134(ish) I have now, but if it makes you happy I will gladly go and change my titles XD.
I’m a simple man too, I see someone comment they like when someone shit talks the daily mail I press like on their comment
Just because men don't get upset about being objectified doesn't mean it
a) doesn't exist
b) isn't sexist
c) isn't equal to women being objectified.
Either it's all sexist or none of it is.
Bryce William so sexist SMH
Bryce William What makes you say that?
I kinda agree with you, Rak. I mean, I completely agree that men are and can be objectified as well, but I'm not sure about the sexism part of it. Sexism and objectification are two different things. Just because you have one doesn't mean the other is present as well.
With that in mind and based solely upon what is seen in this video, both the women and the man in the video were objectified, but none of them faced sexism. In the wider world, I agree that sexism and objectification against any gender is wrong, but that women are more often the targets of both and that objectification of men is seen as more socially acceptable than the reverse due to our culture.
Blow-Up Bunny given the higher rate of suicide of men id have to disagree with you, i think sexism against men just happens in ways that are more easily dismissed
sexism is discrimination based off of sex. Doesn't matter if you're male or female.
1:24 "Rubbing down the legs but it's not creepy it's back-of-the-hand stuff"
1:27 "Then I'm not sure what the point of back-of-the-hand stuff was cuz then it's the front of the hands grope-y stuff"
Literally the best part of the video
I think the "bag of dicks" analogy at the end takes the cake :D
Phil: I'm a big strong boy doing big boy things!
Me: *Me me big boy*
"unless he was just freestyling" 😂 crease
I've had a pat down from the TSA multiple times because I travel in and out of the USA a lot, but it has never looked like that. That video made me want to vomit, horrifying.
Pat down for males is more intensive. Women get special privileges with the womens card
Cat but are they even allowed to touch your genital area? I mean he's a child and has a medical issue for goodness sakes.
Renae H Touch would suggest something different. But yes, they can do everything in their power to make sure you are not concealing something around an area that humans typically do, for obvious reasons. Most to.es that simply involves brushing with the hand.
I don't know what people want. People don't want profiling so everyone has to be treated the same. Even mentally challenged kids. That is a standard patdown for law enforcement.
Not always. I'm a woman and I was patted down like this. Then again, I'm young, so I'm not sure if age has anything to do with it.
Cat
are you mental, no they do not all that would happen is that they would get another woman to Pat her down and it will be just as invasive as another man patting down another man
What's the point of going through all those machines if they are still going to do that
Now I know where all those catholic priests went
For sure man! Creepy as hell.
do parents need to carry cards that say "hey my kid is different" to convince people not to traumatize these kids? With all these ways of screening they had to do something that would potentially hurt this kid. What if the touch was processed as pain? Then you're hurting the poor kid. Even if that wasn't the TSA intention the fact that the kid is feeling pain is horrible. shame on TSA. Shame. Shame. Shame. *rings a bell*
STRANGER DANGER! STRANGER DANGER!! KEEP GRANDPA GROPE AWAY FROM ME!
The daily mail, what a joke... I class it as "news" as much as Buzzfeed.
George Andrews Honestly, I do the same. They're nothing but a sexist (on both genders) , click bait "news" source.
buzzfeed are probably better haha, wasnt it the daily mail that wikipedia classed as an unreliable source... wikipedia?! that's the state of UK journalism
I had an identical pat down by TSA at Logan airport a little over a month ago. I felt very uncomfortable as an 18 y/o male, I can't imagine this poor kid.
I've had one similar as a female and I wasn't a bitch about a security check.
I know that empathy is a learned skill, but I feel like you would do well to practice it more. May be you're having a bad day, I don't know you. I just don't feel that calling someone a bitch for being uncomfortable with being pat down is a measured response.
Any search is uncomfortable for me as well. I only had my front pockets patted because I'd missed a couple of coins when emptying my pockets and it was really weird with that same slow, very gentle bordering on caressing touch from the TSA guy. I honestly think they're trained in that particular motion as it is very disarming and awkward, but in a way that you can't really put your finger on as to why you find it is offensive. Probably because it's unnatural for almost any other situation in life. I don't think he was trying to feel me up, he was just doing his job, and had tons of witnesses right there who would be on my side if he had because the TSA has a horrible reputation. People need to cut the guy some slack and stop calling him a pedo. He'd have to be the worlds stupidest pedo to be actively feeling the kid up while on camera and in front of live witnesses. Shame on Phil for suggesting the guy is a pedo and going along with the outrage machine.
Ninja563 nah, you're probably just a bitch in general...
+Ninja563 Thumbs up because "I wasn't a bitch" had me rolling so fucking hard I almost woke someone up in the middle of the night. Jesus christ
I get this every time through TSA. why? because I have medication that can't go thru x-ray. they check that, drug screen the items, then pat me down including pulling my pants out to look inside at my under garments, touch around my breasts, run their hands (back, so it's ok -.-) over my nipples, and run it over the front of my vagina.They cup my butt and boobs and I have had them look in between my toes. Then there's my husband who gets thru with 2 lighters and a knife. It's gotten to the point in the past where my HUSBAND has said it makes him uncomfortable and asked them to stop. By the way, this is after I went thru (and passed) the regular and handheld metal detector plus I have 3 different doc notes. It's extremely uncomfortable and for me, more often than not, painful.
Kaitlynn Valero That's fucking creepy
UR PROBLEM SEEM TO BE WAY TOO complicated and specific i hope u get better but cant u just pass for half second under the x-ray every-time u travel which like atleast once every couple of month ???
kogy Unfortunetly It would ruin my medication. It's not an option for me, otherwise I would.
Umbroski It's honestly gross
Kaitlynn Valero what if you applied for TSA quick pass thing? I don't actually know if that would help but maybe
That is so f*cking creepy and wrong. It's even creepy that they used the word "intimate" to describe how TSA is going to change. bleck, like stop.
I live in the Bay Area and fly down to LA regularly for specialist appointments at UCLA medical neurology. I am in a wheelchair, and cannot go through the scanning process because, ya know, wheelchairs are metal and millimeter waves don't work. I have to go through this EXACT pat down twice every trip, and while I understand that the TSA needs some better protocols for able-bodied individuals, I do believe that pat downs are a necessary. People need understand that no one gets a freebie because they pass the eye test. If the TSA officer did anything wrong, it was if he didn't ask the boy and his mom if he would feel more comfortable if he did the pat down in private, where the mom could be with the son.
When it comes to objectification of men and women, it should be all genders or none. It's hypocritical to say it's bad when woman are specialized but not men, and vice versa. People honestly need to pick a side, for or against it, period.
I feel like buzzfeed is just trying to get views and that is why they're using those "clickbait" headlines and pictures. But using sexist titles like that really grinds my gears because you cant say that you are fighting for justice between both genders, and then do the exact thing you're fighting against for one of the genders.
Phil disliking the daily mail is my aesthetic
It's okay the Daily Mail is notorious in the UK for being utter trash.
It's also the most popular.
My Mother was visiting her Sister in Florida(she was Canadian). They both got in a car accident and my Mother broke her hip, she was over 60 at the time.
Because the healthcare system is so expensive in the USA, they sent a nurse to bring her back to Canada.
On her way through customs, the TSA made her stand for half her pat down and then made her walk through the metal detector along with everyone else. The nurse demanded to assist her through but they would not allow it since there were handrails she could hold on to...
He literally had to catch her on the other side as she could no longer hold her own weight.
GG TSA!
PS
Trudeau is a douche.
The TSA doesn't do anything except give the illusion of safety and that shit is fucking ridiculous.
"MORE LEGS THAN A BUCKET OF CHICKEN 🍗 😂"
To everyone saying that Trudeau isn't being objectified or that it "doesn't count", that's stupid. Both men and women are objectified and I, for one, support neither. You can't be ok with one and not ok with the other.
grandpa canyoukeepasecret lol, why do i love that so much
The outcries for women being sexualised are valid, but hypocritical at the same time. It's been happening for years. Look up any article on the Fappening. It on;y talks about how women were the victim. Women are being treated like objects. Yet, there was a picture of Matt Smith's dong front and center as well.
Or with Paige from the WWE. Everything is "how dare someone violate her privacy like this." But practically no one mentions that an equally famous Male wrestler, Xavier Woods, is in one of the videos with her. Were his right not violated just because her rights were?
And where is the line supposed to be drawn? A Prime Minister cannot be sexualised, but David Beckham can? Chris Evans can?
For people to even begin to think that men don't get sexualized CONSTANTLY is baffling.
On point. But what baffels me even more is that people seem to think that calling someone attractive takes away from their orher skills/attributes. Like calling a comedic actor/actress attractive doesnt make them less funny or talented. And calling a poltician attractive doesnt make them any less powerful either.
My god I love this comment, someone who FINALLY gets it. Baffled how more don't think like you cheers mate
Agreed I have a friend that was really upset for Paige but didn't even mention Woods or Maddox.
For a second I thought you meant Chris Evans the British TV presenter... Fugggg......
Joel Molyneux why do we care that anyone gets sexualized?
Thats something that ALWAYS bugs me, is i see women being pissed at being objectified but those same women are objectifying these stars. And the things they say are super sleazy, but dont you dare call them out on it.
I dont know.. hypocrisy is a tricky thing to deal with.
accidentprown THANK YOU! I'm the only person around me who notices it and it pisses me off
Bullshit. Who are these 'same women' you're talking about?
accidentprown all of buzzfeed in particular... thank you.
Chibbykins well in the supernatural fandom alone it's insane.
accidentprown the supernatural fanbase drives me nutz uggh the show is so good tho..its crazy tho cuz alot of my guy friends dont watch it but girls i know who arent into the premise or even fantasy anything(tlc/mobsters wives type of show viewers) love the show..i dunno its just weird..
The TSA is definitely a waste. They are frustrating and annoying because they take forever to do anything, and yet they do not accomplish anything. And the fact that they have a 5% success rate, nope nope nope. My grandfather literally left his pocket knife in his carry on, and they didn't find it. And this pocket knife was very big, not some tiny little thing. If the TSA actually accomplished something and helped us, then I wouldn't be angry. But the fact that they are invading the privacy of other people without actually saving us from dangers, no no nope. This is so ridiculous.
Monkacornoo! How much experience do you have with TSA? I've flown 3 times in the last few years, all international, and I was through very quickly with everything. My belt even set off an alarm the first time I flew and got a big pat down. Wasnt offended.
There's only one taxi series i like more than Cash Cab ;)
couches of my childhood
Salty fake taxi....you're welcome Internet
Salty taxi cab confessions 😊
Salty fake cab
I'm Canadian. I hate when the news just reports on Trudeau that way (especially coming from other countries news). I do think its probably worse for female politicians. In the democratic primaries Bernie always looked like someones dad dressed Larry David. He wore a ski jacket to the inauguration too and no one flipped out like they did about Hillary's suits.
hi, I'm an actual TSA agent at ft.lauderdale ,and I can shed some light on this.
see, I had to do a pat down on a kid once. it was a regular every kind of day, when this kids mom asked if her child could forgo the standard pat down,much like the mother in this story. she didn't feel comfortable with her child being searched and didn't see the need for it, but unfortunately we have rules to follow. much to her dismay we had to pay down her child. the woman was in histerics, screaming "YOU FUCKING PIGS" and caused a huge scene at the gate. I personally felt awful, but I had a job to do. Her husband tried calm her down after we told them we'd have to have them removed if they continued like this. they eventually calmed down and we proceeded to conduct a pat down on the 12 year old boy. I felt gross doing it, and I was just trying to get it over with. but when I was patting him down around his upper thighs, I felt something. something long and thick. "WHAT ARE YOU DOING TO MY SON? YOU SICK FUCK ILL KILL YOU" his mom yelled as I started stroking this long cylindrical object in the boys pants. the boy started looking nervous, tears in his eyes, but those tears didn't phase me. I knew what I had to do. suddenly I shoved my hand down the boys pants. shock and yelling over took the scene. every one out raged. the parents furious, frothing at the mouth yelling red in the face, my colleagues confused and worried. on Lookers gasped, some yelling "Fuck pigs!" others in tears. suddenly, I remove my hand from the boys pants, and in my hand, a stick of dynamite. a gasp overtakes the crowd. the parents now wide eyed and quite. I then remove the boys mask to reveal,
Nosferatu. "not this time Nosferatu, your reign of terror ends now"
"drats, curse you TSA and your intuitive security measures! I should have known better than to mess with America's elite security agency!"
the parents were appearantly vampire servant slaves that were in on it. we garlic sprayed all three of them just for good measure, and locked them up immediately. every one clapped, and lives were saved.
this is just an every day thing for TSA. so as a fellow TSA agent, I don't fault this man, because that small child could totally be a vampire lord with dynamite in his pants.
Personally as someone who has Learning Differences I would be absolutely livid If I saw the TSA doing this to someone who struggles with sensory input especially a child.
TheJjcczz I think it would piss of most people regardless.
TheJjcczz The fact that anyone could let something like this happen is disgraceful.
Sensory processing disorder isn't a real disease
Dylan You're right it's a learning difference that people are born with. It can also be a side effect of several other learning differences, but to a lesser extent.
Dylan It is a disorder not a disease. Look up the difference. That said, it is a very REAL disorder that my child has. It isn't even a "learning difference" as another sated. It is a disorder that affects the processing of sensory stimuli. My son went through over 2 years of occupational therapy and cognitive behavior therapy plus 6 months of social skills class before being discharged from the specialist. This was done through our local children's hospital. Please learn more before claiming something "isn't real". You have no idea the toll this takes on a family as a whole.
NO, Phil, you are NOT being "too hard on the TSA agent". Because SPD does NOT just mean you have "difficulties processing information" ... because those difficulties typically animate/result in pain, confusion, even nausea and delirium. Sensory Processing Disorder can mean that you process things less, but for many it is not that simple. Can you imagine being a 12-year old boy getting a pat down, while every time they touch you it feels like what nails on a chalk board sounds/feels like, except on your skin, on every inch of your skin for every moment there's contact? What they did to that child is DESPICABLE and DISGUSTING
RosscoAW thank u
RosscoAW They HAVE to do pat downs to make sure they are not smuggling drugs.
I disagree - It doesn't seem to me like this calls for anger at that specific TSA agent, as it seems like he's just following procedure. Now, whether you agree with that procedure or not is a different story, and you can get mad at the TSA itself for its rules, but to throw your anger at this guy would be shooting the messenger in my opinion.
I get migraines when I am over exposed to any of the senses.
RosscoAW the Nuremberg trials proved that "just following orders" is an inadequate defense.
So... are we going to get a 'Take Me Seriously' shirt now? Please do.
Stop it Joe. You can't keep taking advantage of my wallet like this.
Male or Female, all 3 PMs were objectified. The difference is that (in politics) men benefit from it while women are held back by it. Which is why Trudeau's team propagated and encouraged the "Hot JT" stories all through the campaign and continue to do so now.
Nobody just "found" or even went looking for pics of young Trudeau. Those were disseminated to various news outlets by his staff. Meanwhile, the female PMs have spent their entire career trying to avoid these kinds of articles, but they still pop up, completely uninvited.
I don't think there's anything wrong with people talking about how attractive people in the public eye are. Just so long as it doesn't get told as "news". Keep that shit on the gossip sites.
I totally agree. When a male leader is looked at as "good looking" or "hot," people want to listen more. Whereas if a woman is looked at as "good looking" or "having nice legs," people tend to not take them seriously.
If a man is powerful and influential his attractiveness is a footnote. If a woman is attractive (or unattractive) it is a headline.
Michael Makoa the easiest example is Sarah Palin. She said a fair amount of dumb things, but conservatives had no problem with that. Then she wears one dress that is kinda tight, and suddenly the majority of her own political party said, "I just can't take a hussy like that seriously."
I've also seen it with many female politicians that run for Senate, Congress or local gov't. If they are under 45 and even SLIGHTLY attractive, their critics claim they are just in politics for attention, the only reason people vote for them is because they're "hot", they obviously didn't earn their position, they have no idea what hard work is because attractive women don't have to work for anything, etc.
The current mayor of my hometown is doing a better job than any of the last 3 mayors before her. But she's decent looking for her age (43), so the news papers still run editorials about how she "uses her feminine whiles" to trick the city council into doing things. (Even though she only ever wears these huge, over-sized, boxy, unflattering pantsuits)
And I've also seen it first hand in both school and the professional work force. If a woman is even somewhat attractive, there are always a few assholes who assume she got the job/promotion/grade because the boss/teacher wants to bang them. Or if the boss/teacher is also a woman, then the assholes will say that the attractive girl obviously manipulated a man into doing her work for her. And those few assholes just keep spreading the rumors regardless of how they are disproven.
TL:DR- there are many examples in politics, work and school.
Michael Makoa Well, you can't really dictate what people can or can't say about public figures because it would go against free speech. But you can call people out for spreading BS. And if enough people call it out, then maybe these newspapers/blogs/whatever will lose credibility and business. So maybe the public can enforce accountability where the gov't cannot.
But that's just a short term reaction to a long term problem. People don't just suddenly develop double standards the day they turn 18. Those are bad habits that are taught and reinforced throughout childhood. We need to be teaching the new generations about personal responsibility. About acknowledging a person's merits and not using lame excuses (like physical appearance) to invalidate their achievements or potential.
And people are always going to disagree on things. But we need to teach kids the difference between a good argument (logic/reason/proof) and the bullshit fallacies that people usually use as arguments.
I'm just another person on the Internet, so I can't claim to have all the answers. But maybe these 2 approaches would be a good start.
lol "grandpa gropes-a-lot"
Mikey Pearce "grandpa can u keep a secret" hahaha
Don't forget "grandpa can you keep a secret?" lmao
"More legs than a bucket of chicken" that made my day! 😂😂😂
How is this okay for the TSA to do this? Why did he even get a pat down if he didn't set off any alarms?
Much like you, if that were my child, I'd either be shot or in jail... to me nothing is worse than hurting a child because it's not just a moment- they're destroyed for life, notwithstanding, having done my grad studies in clinical psych, I'm absolutely appalled and the APA needs to get on this. That "pat down" was disgusting, the child has SPD, and the asshat agent knew that; I hope she makes a civil suit because for a child with SPD that would have been emotionally and physically devastating.
Wow that video just disgusts me! I've been felt up pretty invasively while going though TSA before and I know how I feel as a grown adult. I can't imagine how that kid felt. SMH!!
I am begging you to address the missing Black and Latina girls in DC. There are 22 missing girls within this MONTH, most of them under 18, and I feel like NO ONE is talking about it. Everyone refuses to address it. It's distressing and scary. How does a nation ignore 22 missing children?
Holy shit, 1 missing child is big news. 22 missing children is terrifying!
Kendra Wright hillary and her friends are involved so the media wont talk about it...
Kendra Wright its not real. please looking into it. I'm from DC.
"One missing person is a tragedy. Thirty missing people is a statistic."
GalacticSlayer care to explain?
Holy fuck I couldn't even watch that video without feeling sick. I'm with you, Phil. If someone was touching my niece, the light of my life, like that, I'd be on the no fly list and my pilots license revoked.
The objectification of both men and women is a fact and equally unacceptable. What difference there is lies in that, historically, men have had more agency than women, and so have been able to maintain and enjoy a measure of respect even when objectified. But on a normal day the objectification of women is typically more dangerous for women's safety-in a moment of spontaneity, an average man can overpower an average woman, while the reverse is not as likely to be true.
This is why it's perceived as being "worse" for women-because objectification of a person is dehumanization, and dehumanization of a person ultimately results in a lack of respect, and when you have no respect for a person, does it matter who does what to them or when? But neither men nor women should dismiss or marginalize objectification, as the unfettered objectification of either sex undermines the progression of society as a whole.
As a woman, I hate how much buzzfeed objectifies men. But when it comes generally to Justin Trudeau, a lot of articles were written because individual people were talking about how 'hot' he was, and a lot of focus on that was his muscles when he was not wearing clothing. When it's individual people making these statements, I'm not really against it. But the daily mail is an organisation (I live in the uk and I hate that they're still on the shelves, they're RIDICULOUSLY sexist) and they were commenting on something COMPLETELY unrelated to the massive issue at hand, the Scottish referendum. These two women are our leaders in the UK, they deserve respect and after so much systematic sexism in our country I can't believe that in 2017 this still happens. Oppression of men just doesn't work in the same way due to historical context (still ew to buzzfeed though), and I hope the daily mail goes bankrupt soon or something.
The TSA should be heavily reined back. Between the intrusiveness and absurd restrictions, it's just absurd.
"Unless he was free styling." Best quote this year.
want to know my thoughts on the TSA? In 2015 I flew to Alaska and had a layover in Seattle. Being it was 5 hours, I stepped outside with my then 5 month old son to walk and get some fresh air. We went back through TSA and I was selected for a pat down. They gave me a very condescending attitude when they found out my son and I were flying solo (husband was already at the destination) and I was given a VERY touchy pat down. My son was in his carrier and crying while that happened. I don't think I need to describe how humiliated I felt walking out of a secluded room fixing my outfit and struggling with a baby and rushing to grab my luggage and be on my way. TSA is bullshit and if that had been my son getting such an invasive pat down, I'd be tackling someone.
I'm Canadian and when I'm traveling I won't even get on a flight that stops over in the US on my way to my final destination. I also won't drive across the boarder. I would love to go to Burning Man and a few other events in the states, but to me it's not worth it the way US officials treat people.
Canada still struggles with aboriginal rights, its real estate is being bought up by Chinese billionaires. And let's not forget that your country produced Justin Bieber, a kid so sick with "affluenza," that the only cure is a bullet. The point is, no country is perfect. If you justify your hate by the actions of US officials, then you might as well leave your own country as well, go live in Antarctica.... and it's spelled borders, by the way, not "boarders."
kailaniivo Canada has no blame in Justin Bieber, Hollywood & the U.S. turned him into what he his now
LOL, so you mean before that he was a real classy kid? I doubt it. In any case, the point was that it's pretty silly to not even enter the air space of US just because of US officials. Every country has its flaws.
I think it's pretty safe to say that Phil is going to get a pretty invasive pat down next time through the airport 🤣
TSA has been more straight forward than any of my ex gf when it comes to touching.
My mother recently flew through Dallas and was also harassed and treated very rudely by their TSA agents. She has a stoma, basically an internal colostomy bag, as a result of bladder surgery and carries her medical information on her at all times. Despite this she was forced through multiple pat downs and basically treated like a criminal because the agents were convinced that she doesn't have an artificial bladder, but was instead attempting to smuggle something onto the plane.
regarding the TSA news :
when a person has a disability, you don't just go and force them to do what they "can't Do". mental, psychological and neurological disabilities must be taken as serious as the physical disabilities. it's just like forcing a person on a wheelchair to stand, walk, and jump.
rose tariq my brother has sensory issues he would've had a melt down
My mom is on a cane and TSA made her stand without it for an extended period of time for a pat down once, despite the pain it put her through. They're trash about these things.
CrazedPhantom I hope he will never be in that situation.
Siobhan NiGhuairim pardon me if I didn't fully understand your point.
but that is exactly what I'm trying to say. mental or psychological disabilities most of the times can't be seen by others, unlike physical disabilities ( only felt by the patient) that is why there must be specific regulations special to those people in need.
Floofy Gaming sad to hear that. hope things get better soon.
LOL "more legs than a bucket of chicken, Brexit isn't the only thing I want to separate".
Now I want "Take Me Seriously" shirts
I recently got a pat down just like this because I had a walking boot. They lifted my shirt to check my waist band, which I was absolutely not comfortable with. Then, when we were flying back home we found out they took away our TSA pre approval with no warning or word about it.
That dude is suspicious. He had no reason to cancel, and no reason was given.
Idk... but I kinda want a shirt that says "Take me seriously"
subzerovice I would totally buy that shirt.
subzerovice honestly
subzerovice me too, that fits with my above comment... I'd buy it
Kid handled it well. Should have been your bamf of the day.
James Laidler I miss they bamf of the day segment.
Banwait A Wat
So that would be an MBAMF... sounds oddly like a Hanson song.
David Logan Oh why did you have to do that? Bloody 90's ear worms!
Thank you, Philip, for explaining what SPD is to the humans watching. *Thumbs up*
That pat-down was horribly uncomfortable to watch...
Id say if he scanned the boy one time pretty "intimately" It would be bad but not as bad, the fact that he went back and forth several times not only on the armpits and sholders but on his legs aswell is very disturbing.
I mean let's be honest Buzzfeed pretty much objectifys everyone anyway.
Can i just take my clothes off at the airport, so that I don't get harassed?
JuanCarr see-through clothes
this has been brought up by people i was with in the airport one time lol
LET THEM SEE WHAT IT FEELS LIKE TO BE UNCOMFORTABLE!
it me that's probably the best argument against the TSA pat downs.. because it's not like they can stick a finger up your arse
Amanda Orly, wanna bet?
My main issue between the PM's Legs debate vs. 'Pm Steal yo' girl' is that the title of the Daily Mail article is literally stating "Completely disregard what these women are meeting to discuss, and instead focus on their bodies" as opposed to just images of young Justin. If there was an article of "Look how hot young Theresa May is" I wouldn't have an issue with that at all. There may be articles disregarding Justin Trudeau's policies in favour of his looks but I'm only going from the ones in this video. If I saw one I'd likely disagree with that too. (Or is the title 'PM Steal Yo' Girl' doing just that?)
"Grandpa can you keep a secret"
God damnit Phil XD
re: The Justin Trudeau thing, It's super weird to see people in other nations reducing your political leader to some weird sexualized version of himself. As not great as Harper was, at least people tended to take us seriously on an international scale because he was old and frumpy.
But seriously, every time I scroll past one of those articles I can't help but cringe. It's weird and super uncomfortable as a Canadian to see all this weird hype about his appearance (NOT TO MENTION the weird reaction to thr ivanka trump pictures during that US visit. I mean c'mon. He's married with kids.)
IN REGARDS TO THE TSA VIDEO: as someone who doesn't fly very often (i maybe fly at least once maybe twice a year) i didn't really see the cause for that much outrage. while i do not agree with the TSA not modifying their procedure to better accommodate a person with a disability or even an age appropriate modification, i was always under the impression that this kind of pat down was "by the books". i am well aware that when it comes to underage children, you have to be very careful as to what they are subjected to especially if they are your child .i would never want my underage family members to be subjected to anything that is deemed inappropriate. it's just that from the video i have seen, it seemed like the child was calm and the TSA agent conducted himself in a seemingly professional manner. perhaps this is my ignorance to checking in to flights, but this is just something i felt i needed to type. i might get flamed for this so do your worst.
duece08 agreed!
duece08 look up how many terrorists they've caught. Zero. look how many of them have been caught doing shit they shouldn't.
duece08 they're a waste of funding.
You don't see what the problem is?!? Seriously?!?
the main difference between trudeau and the dailymail story, I believe, is that women are WAY more likely to be treated as 'not important' or 'not serious' in their careers because of their looks than men. A man can be heralded as a heartthrob and still be taken seriously. Women historically, and currently, are treated with less respect in their careers for this. Whereas trudeau faces next to zero backlash for it.
Equality is important, but the differences need to be acknowledged.
I have a bit of a weird line with regards to the sexism. To me the reason the Daily Mail article is an issue is the picture is taken from a meeting of the two leaders to discuss serious issues, namely whether Brexit will result in Scotland leaving the UK. It's a serious matter being discussed by two very powerful people. If it were a more general thing, like articles about how attractive someone finds Nicola Sturgeon, I would have less of a problem with it. Similarly if the Trudeau articles were comparing how well he wears a suit vs Obama at a world summit or something, I would have an issue. They're there to conduct serious business. I know it's a bit of a weird line, but for me trivializing the work these leaders do is where it gets sexist and objectifying.
There are examples of objectification of Trudeau at serious events
This makes sense -- if you just randomly had an article somewhere that says "Doesn't this person look nice?", that's (imo) fine, but if instead of covering something important (what someone is doing/saying) you ignore that in favour of their looks, you're communicating that how they look is more important than what they were doing/saying. (On the other hand, that could be perceived as a compliment: "Sure that stuff was important, but they look _that_ good!")
In my opinion if someone is good looking they're good looking how is that sexist? Not only that but it's not like that's all the article discussed. Headlines get peoples heads turning and articles read, plain and simple. It's about headlines not sexism.
Ian Morris exactly, it's not the fact that they "objectify" him. He's still seen as a individual, capable, powerful AND hot, he's not reduce only to his looks. On the other hand when is the female you have the opposite, she's objectified when only seen as an sexual being (or just an object for pleasure) without consideration for her as a individual with all of what that means. The question is: from where are they look at? Does the sexist stand only perceives them like subjects (or objects) of desiree or as capable and autonomous individuals?
anotsofungirl true, i mean in the end no matter how much we hate it , a double standard does exist, u say that Justin Trudeau is hot and it prolly works in his favour but when they say certain female P.M has great legs then u just end up belittling her and her position and the mass thinks more about that then checking to see whether the person is actually capable or not
"grandpa gropes alot" GOD DAMMIT PHIL. this is a serious thing and i cant stop laughing
TSA is terrible. I've worked in airports and it is a joke. That pat down while yes pat downs there is no reason for having a pat down unless something is registered when going through the detectors. No reason for that sort of pat down on a child.
Solink Manarath I agree 100% that if there was no alarm there shouldn't be a pat down unless you can see that they are hiding something
You're take is spot on! TSA has not stopped a single incident with a 7 billion dollar a year budget in 13 years.
I think Phil really did a good job hitting on both of these examples of sexism/objectification in the media. They are two extremely similar situations but only one is getting attention or being attacked.
Thanks for pointing out an internal bias. I really didn't think "WTF?!" after seeing the second headlines, but it is the exact same situation. This is something I'll need to stop and think about before siding with someone in these situations. If equality is the goal, we can't have double standards - either it is acceptable to sexualize/objectify a person or it is not.
The thing is men don't usually care too much about it.
This sort of thing is everywhere, once you start looking for it.
The worst I've heard is a friend getting laughed out of a police station for being raped by a woman (He's a guy).
Apparently blackmail and emotional torture don't matter if you get it up.
+MrKosman123 Don't think it matters - the individual should always be respected no matter what you think their preferences will be.
+WirlWind Holy shit that's terrible, not sure what the US equivalent of the IPCC (Independent Police Complaints Commission) is but I hope it was at least reported. I really feel for your friend, I can't imagine how that must feel. :(
I agree, I'm just saying the possible reason why It's not as big of "news" than when it's women.
You are not being too harsh. It is ABSOLUTELY ridiculous. I flew through two very small airports while I was 25 weeks pregnant. I was told it was safe to fly, but to avoid the full body scanners since there are no long term studies on the effects, especially in pregnant women.
When I asked to not use the scanner, I was met with eye rolls and demeaning talk about how I was being overly cautious. Yeah? Well then why do you have to wear badges that detect radiation?
I was invasively patted down by a female agent while two creepy male agents watched. They do the search up both legs until they "meet resistance." In other words until her hand was so far up my crotch she couldn't go any further.
It was embarrassing and demeaning. TSA is power tripping and ineffective.
I can understand some need for airport security, but the TSA goes too far.
It is a power game. I don't see how anyone doesn't recognize it. As are our "police" & military.
Amanda Young LMFAO. No one in tsa wears badges that detect radiation are you getting your info from fox? 😂😂😂also the scanner is 1000 times less dangerous than having a cell phone call. So you look stupid for asking for a pat down but it's your choice, don't complain that YOU went with the more invasive option. 😂🤷🏼♀️
Melissa Evans why is the word police in quotations
All I saw was a guy doing his job. The TSA confistated 6000 weapons in 2016 alone. Thousands of drugs too. If kids get a free pass then people will use kids to smuggle shit. People sew drugs into clothing, even their skin hence why they do the caress pat down to see if there are bumps in the person's skin or clothing.
I am Canadian, and I have friends who voted for Trudeau in the last election because he is attractive. If that isn't sexist, I don't know what is.
Don't get me wrong, I think he is a decent Prime Minister, and ran a good campaign, voting for someone based on their attractiveness is a problem.
Julianne Marshall I agree with the problem but what makes it sexist? It's not anti-women or anti-men
Julianne Marshall I wouldn't say it's sexist, shallow is the word you were looking for.
well to be fair your friend is not alone some people vote for Obama because he was black, some vote for Donald Trump because he is a white man....
I didn't vote Hillary because she is ugly and old. Not sexist.
Taryn Emerle what does objectifying someone have to do with their sex/gender?
When I was 13 I was separated from my family at the airport and pat down in an extreme way like that. I don't have any kind of sensory disorders, but it was still an awful experience, and it's disgusting that years later this stuff is still happening.
that pat down was disgusting. are you kidding me. That would be inappropriate no matter the person. That was grabbing and touching.
The daily mail outrage is just eye rolling. Its so clear they only did that because they knew it would cause controversy. They are doing it to gain traction. Remember the business saying "Any attentions good attention, weather it makes me look like an ass" Seriously just don't give them the satisfaction of even caring about it. Its just dumb news.
It's weird. I'm as liberal as they come, but I definitely agree there's a gray area. It seems to me that news articles are over-exaggerating the smallest details to try and get people reading articles to get the drama rolling. However, if my friends asked me if I ate a bag of dicks and replied "No comment", they'd think I'm as straight as a broken treebranch, so In other words; I think the government is scared of admitting it's sexuality :D. More seriously, I think that the government is hiding something that could make the public go irrationally nuts... personally the public to me is pretty dumb, including myself... and it's just because we're misinformed and lack the facts. So maybe they're hiding something that's not too bad of a problem because it'd make people riot over nothing ... or it's immense and could have a serious impact on us. If they are hiding something though, I have not the slightest clue to what it is. But to be completely honest, I think this all is just a bunch of House of Cards and we should focus on other, more important problems in our world.... like how I only have $14.55 for a game that costs $15
I'm starting to get the feeling that the trump administration wants to provoke the lefties and liberals by behaving this way. To answer no comment in this situation is just odd.
The tax return is also another thing, why would trump refuse to show it when the figures showed he actually didn't have to hide it. Maybe he's trying to set up a trap to embarrass the media, who knows.
I am a professional truck driver. When TSA was created, we had to go thru a TSA background check, mind you at a 1 time 85 dollar fee.
After they realized how much money they were getting, they changed the rules and now made it a mandatory background check every 5yrs when you have to renew your Class A license! At a new fee of 95 dollars and again go thru a waiting period of up to 2 months before you are cleared!
What a joke
Regardless of how sexist or disrespectful objectifying Justin Trudeau is, the daily mail article is still sexist. At worst, they are both sexist, but comments on Justin Trudeau have no effect on the Daily mail article. The only relevance between the two is if someone claimed one is ok but the other is not. Assuming both are equally disrespectful, that would be hypocritical. However, I think the fact that they are equal is very much up for debate.
Hey Phil, I really agree with you on the whole equality for both sexes in terms of objectification. Being from Scotland, I can say that when Nicola Sturgeon lost a little weight and changed her appearance it was all that UK media wanted to talk about her for. Her predecessor, Alex Salmond, didn't face nearly this amount of sexism. While you say "we shouldn't take the Daily Mail seriously" I totally agree but I can say that there are many people across the UK who pick up the Sun or the Daily Mail newspaper and read it as their legitimate news source. From my point of view, women are far more subject to this sexism in politics but I agree that we have to fight the battle for both sexes. I am proud that in Scotland 3/5 main party political leaders are women and that 4/5 consider themselves LGBT. Tackling sexism in the media is essential to tackling sexism overall.
I'm sick of picking sides. I'm sick of both the right & the left. But than if you don't fall in line with either side you're than shamed upon and deemed for letting the other side win. Can't we just come together as a whole and have it just be us?
We can't "come together" as long as people have different opinions on how our lives can be improved. On a side note, part of the reason Bernie did so well (and Trump but not as much) is because people are tired of choosing a side. Grouping opinions into two groups is never a good idea, but is unavoidable.
It's good to be idealistic, but you have to be realistic as well. The world isn't United, it's easier to hate on people than to try and compromise. Don't pick a side if you don't want to, but then when things happen despite you, you're just going to have to go along with it.
Drewsefer89 Listen to the new podcast s-town. I agree with the clockmaker. The us will deteriorate into autonomous regions with some self sustaining modern societies, and others will be fucking hell holes.
Drewsefer89 it's called being a moderate, you're not alone dude😂 more than half the country is a moderate too. America is just fucked and we have to face it.
You're being a bit idealistic. It's not possible for us to "come together." People will always have opinions that differ from someone one else. What we need to do is try to understand the other side and understand that they are just trying to do what they think is best. That is assuming that we all have the facts and data.
Who's here in 2018?
Security theater should remember it is security theater.
As someone who has studied the full body scanners that TSA uses (BTW they can save your photos hence why i refuse to go through the scanners) I request pat downs every time i go through security. And even though I disagree with the TSA policies nothing that man did was out of norm, first they slide their hands down your back and front and yes they have to check the genital area. Is it weird to see an old man perform this on a child? Yes, but this man is just doing his job and i bet that 2 min was probably more uncomfortable for him than anyone else.
Desmond Saisitthidej tru
Desmond Saisitthidej but isn't it a little unprofessional to have an older man check a younger male I feel that they should have a specialist or someone more on the younger side
why the pat downs though, there's metal detector and also k9, one for metal the other for chemical, there's no actual need for pat downs
andhika bayu there's no need for pat downs per say but there it is the alternative given if you prefer not to enter the full body scanners
There is absolutely no difference between objectification of males and objectification of females. I've heard people preach about this saying that woman are objectified and then two minutes later talking about how hot this or that guy is. If we wish to reach gender equality we must recognize that objectification is not a one way street but rather a coin. Reminds me of the "you can't be racist to white people" argument.
I think its incredibly sexiest that all the daily mail seems cares about the prime ministers legs! our country is going through a major change this week yet they are not taking it seriously, all they care about is the way people look, its setting a terrible example to SO many people! I understand how you can relate it to the Canadian prime minster but all the things about him are mostly in magazines and online but as you said the daily mail is one of the biggest news papers in the UK! they should be talking about things that matter like how Brexit is going to affect the relationship between England and Scotland, not how the prime ministers look! It should be about how they are acting.