ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 16 มิ.ย. 2019
- Chairing an all-party meeting on the eve of the first session of the new Lok Sabha, Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Sunday invited heads of all parties to a meeting on June 19 to discuss the "one nation, one election" idea and other important matters. Noting that there are many new faces in this Lok Sabha, PM Modi said the first session of the Lower House of Parliament should begin with "fresh zeal and new thinking". Addressing the media later, Parliamentary Affairs Minister Prahlad Joshi said the prime minister has requested all parties, especially the opposition, for their cooperation for the smooth functioning of both Houses of Parliament. Apart from "one nation, one election" the all party meeting has been called to deliberate on other matters like - celebrations of 75 years of India's Independence in 2022 and 150 years of Mahatma Gandhi's birth anniversary this year. On this edition of the big picture we will analyse the ‘one nation, one election’ issue
Guest - S K Mendiratta, Former Advisor, Election Commission,
Ashok Tandon, Senior Journalist,
Prof. Sunil K Choudhary, Political Analyst,
Satya Prakash, Legal Editor, The Tribune,
Anchor - Frank Rausan Pereira
One Nation - One Election
Key Highlights :-
- This year marks the great year for India as we are celebrating 70th anniversary of Independence as well as 150th anniversary of Gandhi Jayanti.
- As said by one of the member the elections in India should become synchronous, and this can be achieved by doing certain amendment in the constitution such as Article 83 (Fix tenure for Lok Sabha that is 5 years), Article 85, Article 172 (Fix tenure for legislative assembly that is 5 years and Article 174.
- The main problem for implementation of such idea is the Parliamentary form of government. The government can fall before its tenure as recently seen in Goa.
- For such problems Presidential form of government like in U.S.A can be the solution. To implement in India we need to amend the Article 356 which authorize the presidential rule.
- Another solution can to, if in case something happens to leader then let the people of house elect the new leader.
- At all the three levels that is Central, State and Local the elections need to be synchronised.
- Over the past years money power in the elections also gone up tremendously.
- If the Representation of People Act,1951 is amended then it would :-
• Save Public Money.
• Reduce the burden on administrator.
• Ensure the timely implementation of government policies.
• Ensure administration machinery is engaged in developmental activity.
- Basic structure of construction might get altered, so we must ensure the political parties consensus.
- Logistics challenges will also be faced by EIC.
WAY FORWARD :-
- Elections in India are celebrated as Festival and if they happen once in every 5 years all together throughout country then it would be regarded as 'Maha- Festival' for the citizens.
- But this step would also have major drawback that is there are some political parties which might perform good at central level but the same political party may fail at regional level. For example which was seen in State assembly polls in state of Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh and Jharkhand.
- The government makes many amendment in the constitution but one big amendment in constitution would benefit all tge citizens of country.
Copy pest of insight ias,:(
@@aamirkhangahnavi7155 You first read whole content of Insights IAS and then you have look at this content. You will get clear picture whether or not it is "copy pest" or rather I should write 'copy paste'.
Very nice rishabh.
Ar 83 and 172 do not make the term fix. Rather it will be needed if want simultaneous elections.
@@amit99996 Thanks a lot.
One correction is needed in the beginning.... We are not celebrating the 75th year of our independence this year, we will be celebrating it in 2022.
please include sai deepak in the panel for the discussions pertaining to legal and constitutional matters
This is the debate one can watch , so brilliantly delivered by all panelist and monitored by our beloved anchor Mr. FranK RaUsan PerIarA....👌👌👌
Pandurang Shelke bro how can I improve my English??? please give some tips.
Constitutional impediment in One nation one election :
- Terms of LS & LA should be synchronized -constitutional amendment - Article 83 ( 5yrs term for LS), 85, 174, 172 (5 Yrs term for LA), 356
(President rule in failure of constitutional machinery)
- Legislative term need to be extended & curtailed in some.
- Parliamentary form of govt - govt is accountable to lower house - it can fall before completion its term
radical solution - presidential election - separation of legislative & executive, election day fixed.
- Article 356 - Government goes but assembly remains: Inviting the 2nd person to choose or house elects its own leaders.
- RPA 1951 & Parliamentary procedures.
Benefits of ONOE:
- Save public money
Party expenses, poll expenses: Poll expenses has increased from 11 Cr in 1951 to 16000 Cr in 2019.
- Ensure timely implementation of govt policies - Model code of conduct prevent developmental activities & taking harsh short term measures for long term ambition.
- Reduce burden of administration & security forces : 2.6 Lakh CISF & 10 lakh policemen, 1 Cr people engaged in this - should be utilized in dual elections.
- administrative machinery engaged in development activities
Implementation Challenges:
- Logistical problem - requirement of EVM & VVPAT will double, additional piling of staff increase, requirement of transport, storing EVM's - storing godown
- Political consensus - 2/3 avoid majority & half the states
KCR had election before in Telangana so as not to clash with LS election .
ONOE is a concept in larger public interest. More consensus needs to build among parties & debates must be help to ensure the pros & cons of this step.
Very nice
I want to copy and paste this.
One point that they missed discussing is the effect it will have on the federal structure of our political system.
If we start fighting elections on one nation one election format, there is no scope for separation of national & local issues. Local election will be fought on national issues or vice versa. This will ultimately make the bicameral system ineffective because Rajya Sabha will then represent the national mood during the grand election and thus will be more or less similar in composition to Lok Sabha.
In a country like ours where even today, after 70 years of independence, votes are 'bought' by money or muscle power - one nation one election will lead to monopolizing of election by big national parties like Congress & BJP which have the infrastructure to fight such grand elections. Local parties and thereby local issues will be suppressed. We will move towards more centralisation when the need of the hour is more decentralisation.
So I personally do not think it is a good idea.
The money that the govt spends on election is very meagre in comparison to our national spending. It is the money spent by political parties that have increased disproportionately over the years. Immediate reform that should be brought in is to limit the poll expenditure by each political parties. Single election will only help large political parties to spend lesser on elections(in righteous way or not, this was the money that went in to the pockets of common citizens in one way or the other). Enabling savings of political parties at the cost of federalism is not something that our country can afford to do now.
👍
yeah your views r really good and as far as election expenditure concerned i think govt has to move towards to conduct E-election or take some strict step to control excess expense by political parties
@@radhikabagohil2675 i also prefer the concept of e-election but we are not there, at least not yet. E-election means there will be definite chances of hacking the platform whatever they use. We may go for a digital India but digital security in India is still a mess. So before holding online election we need to strengthen our digital platform so it can withstand different forms of digital threats.
@vivek correctly said, also in India the literacy rate is not so good to immediately understand the concept of one nation one election. An ordinary person who doesn't know much would vote on the basis of the popularity of a particular party or party person rather than on the basis of understanding. This can also lead to centralisation.
'One nation One election' is one of most required policy for our Country. It will save money, time and energy of government departments. It should be implemented as soon as possible.
Don't trade democracy for money
@@justthinking6212 Elections are happening that is Democracy dumba$$.
Madam...p
I have a counter to save money
If we see..the average percapita amount spent on one voter to conduct election is odd 320 rs...by a recent survey
Cant we bare 320 rs for whole 5 years for conducting various elections in our country per person...
Such a largest democracy can say excuses to save money for elections...?
Pooja I Agree with you.....Jay Shelke Pune
@@avinashdhingra204 You stated the definition of democracy. In reality democracy is done. Several polling stations were on camera footage for breaking the model code of conduct. People voter actors who weren't aware of the country's basic issues. And ignored and voted out the ones who are actually doing the jobs.
We support one nation one election
In complete agreement with most of the points discussed
But deep down i think, frequent elections are the only thing that brings developmental issues and people's concerns to the fore,also that's one of the few occasions one can see their sitting MPs/MLAs (due to their re-election bid)
Agreed, same here! It brings more accountability in governance.
Yes, correctly said.. it was also mentioned in a related article of The Hindu.
Most democraric nations have simultaneous elections & continue with their development work.
Many viewers asking for limitations of the said issue...
I m simply pasting from an article for the convenience of exam aspirants.
1-National and state issues are different, and holding simultaneous elections is likely to affect the judgment of voters.
2-Since elections will be held once in five years, it will reduce the government's accountability to the people. Repeated elections keep legislators on their toes and increases accountability.
3-When an election in a State is postponed until the synchronised phase, President’s rule will have to be imposed in the interim period in that state. This will be a blow to democracy and federalism.
The debate has completely missed the negative aspects of simultaneous elections.
yes
me too looking for that
yeah, atleast one of the panelist should support existing system
Nice idea on the ground of imagination
But what about it's feasibility
I am here talking about the constitutionmal amendments that will bne required to be made for this:-
○ ARTICLE 83: Duration of both houses of parliament.
§ Article 83(1): talks about RS:- states that the RS is not subject to dissolution. But, as nearly as possible, one-third of members shall retire on expiration of every second year. This provision will not require any change.
§ Article 83(2): talks about LS. Shall continue for 5 years from the date of first meeting. Expiration of 5 years may be treated as dissolution date. May be dissolved sooner also. When Emergency is in operation, this period of 5 years may be extended by Parliament by law, for not more than one year at a time. Also, extension of tenure shall not take place beyond six months from the end of emergency. This provision will require amendment.
○ ARTICLE 172:- Duration of State Legislatures
§ Article 172(1): Talks about State Assemblies. Shall continue for 5 years from the date of first meeting. Expiration of 5 years may be treated as dissolution date. May be dissolved sooner also. When Emergency is in operation, this period of 5 years may be extended by Parliament by law, for not more than one year at a time. Also, extension of tenure shall not take place beyond six months from the end of emergency. This provision will require amendment. (SEE: extension will have to be approved by Parliament….).
○ Article 85: Sessions of Parliament, Prorogation and Dissolution.
§ Article 85(1): The President shall from time to time summon each House of Parliament to meet at a time and place as he thinks fit, but six months shall not intervene between its last sitting in one session and the date appointed for its first sitting in the next session.
§ Article 85(2)(a): The President may from time to time, prorogue the houses (or either house), (Prorogue----discontinuing a session of parliament without dissolution). This may not require amendment.
§ Article 85(2)(b): The president may from time to time, dissolve the LS. This will require amendment.
○ Article 174: Sessions of State Legislatures, Prorogation and Dissolution.
§ Article 174(1): The Governor shall from time to time summon each House of Parliament to meet at a time and place as he thinks fit, but six months shall not intervene between its last sitting in one session and the date appointed for its first sitting in the next session.
§ Article 174(2)(a): The Governor may from time to time, prorogue the houses (or either house). This may not require amendment.
§ Article 174(2)(b): The Governor may from time to time, dissolve the Legislative Assembly. This will require amendment.
I like this debate. There is no shouting, interrupting. All participated in this debate speak with decipline and without any political purpose
UPSC ASPIRANT. well done rishab bansal
First we want to stop EVM
Need to change Ballet paper election
Like USA, Russia
Otherwise Alibaba Will rule 100 years 😂😂😂
😀
If it is implemented it might become one of the flagship constitutional amendments in the history of the Indian Constitution.
The basic problem in this amendment is awareness of the people about CROSS VOTING. According to the survey, more than 60℅ of the people casting their vote in favour of one political party (in places where assembly and lok sabha election's held simultaneously).
The biggest political party and national parties in india will have more advantages than regional parties.
It is really funny to think that , the govt will not take harsh long term gain decision. You mean Demonetization? It is not wise to take harsh decision. Long term gain is always a myth. you guess the long term gain based on certain assumptions, when the assumptions go wrong, your entire harsh decision becomes useless, the harsh decision always affect only poor. Haven't you learnt any lesson from Demonatization?
i second ..
Think a lot in every angle...If it's impact on Constitution then don't do this...
Sir /mam please correct me if i am wrong..
I think why we cant put a clasue thay..
If any state assembly or lok sabha is dissopved then the new one will continue for the remaining time only???
Then there would be no problem.
Am i right or wrong please correct me if i am wrong.
That's what they meant by fixed tenure. Sathyaprakash mentioned that in first statement
Thankyou very much.
it's very fruitful and worth ideas are given all panelist thank you rs especially Frank.
The idea of drawing out all political party's consensus can be a breakthrogh in the implimentation of one nation ,one election idea...and it is more beneficial than problematic
Thanks...
What about the dominance of national issue over local?
One nation one election might looks good on paper but for the holistic development of our nation separate elections are good
completely in agreement with you .. Moreover, it will be disadvantageous for regional parties as they'll be bogged down by the elephantine manpower and deep pockets of national parties during the election season.
If u cannot trust people to make a right decision what is point of being a democracy.
@@navneetsingh3391 I am not questioning the wisdom of the voters, but we have to be practical here. Lots of issues are raised and DROPPED during the elections. Many issues overshadow others. And lastly let's not forget we have a federal system where state issues are as important as central.
@@shubhammishra204 People should learn to differentiate and prioritise. We get what we deserve. Onus of keeping democracy vibrant and productive is on people as well. Nobody can spoon feed you all life.
BJP lost state elections in Andhra Pradesh & Odisha which were simultaneously held in 2019 with Lok Sabha elections.
It is good at the one end but there are some question in mind. In the beginning it can be easily adopted but as time passes it is not possible to held simultaneous election due to parliamentary form of govt. There are lots of question if any state assembly or central govt. dismiss before completing their tenure then wt will be next step .
Suggestions:
Have the elections simultaneously but declared the results later ans in sync with every states' and center's normal election schedule.
That way we solve the problem needing to sync all state assembly elections with lok sabha elections while conducting elections simultaneously.
Like conducting elections simultaneously but implementing them at different times
Considering the very real possibility of a state government collapsing due to dismissal or no-confidence motions, I think Jay Panda's suggestion of "One Nation, Two Elections" is more feasible.
It doesn't seem to be a debate. It's just a discussion supporting the issue blindly without paying heed to the negative impacts simultaneous elections may bring.
But what about jammu kashmir state assembly since its government formed for 6 years
It is state assembly of Jammu and Kashmir to ammend the j&k constitution to reduce the tenure..
But frequent elections provide opportunity for the voters to secure accountability of political parties towards voters
Exactly!
Awesome debate...so much to learn from ....
What an insightful discussion thank you rstv
I think the remote areas or the tribal areas, rural areas and all will suffer the most in this scenario that is due the their lack of awareness, they might won't able to figure out the elections difference ie: for SLA or LS. moreover, people might vote for the same parties ( even if they don't want to, psychologically saying :P )
actually, it has happened in Odisha where elections are held at the same time for both LA and LS...a few people got confused as to which EVM was for LS and which one for LA.. but with proper labelling and guidance, such things can be avoided...all in all, this doesn't seem to be a big impediment...
how can implement this idea is tha biggest issue
In Andhra Pradesh we had legislative assembly and loksabha elections at same time
Yaa...we and also odisha arunachal and Sikkim assembly elections conducted along with loksabha elections
They are educated enough. They know that development lies in educating People not building a mandir.
With reference to letter to above mentioned subject.
I am informed to you. It is the one nation election very important to all state.
Kindly solve this our queries fast for this election commission. I greatful to you.
With best regards,
Ssc aspirants
Patna.
Thanks RSTV
Yes it is needed to have one nation one election
One nation one election is the need of an hour
Negative aspect-
1.Leads to charismatic leadership form of politician and so called Wave of leader
2.Reduce accountablity
3.governor role or constitutional failure in state or toppling of state government in state govt form by opposition party just after one nation one election as we saw in 1967..1977 election 9 state govt ruled by opposition toppled
4.election take a form of Jumla successfull which ultimately exploit the expectation of people...
5.it may leads to Dictatorship or one party rule like china
6. Not feasible for one of the illiterate population
7.Huge burden on election commission (as we see now 7 phase loksabha election) i think it may take atleast more than 20 phases
8.Basic structure of constitution effected
9. Affect the sepration of power principle (L.E.J)
10.last but not the least
One nation one election also includes 3rd tier of government
Becouse our present Prime minister function also affected in Muncipality election...
Way forward
Needs to focus on
1.better functioning of both houses
2.fix the sitting of calender for sitting of parliament
3. Increase the seating day of the house...
4. Committee establish for scurtiny of legislation
6th and 7th points are totally true. 😂
Yes, it is possible to conduct polls simultaneously of lok sabha and state assembly by amending the Constitution. Once, in some state increase or in some state reduce the tenure of 5 year to conduct polls simultaneously by constitutional amendment. After amendment, when government dissolved before completing it's full tenure {5yr} by no confidence motion or by other mean ,at that time election were held for particular assembly only for remaining time period .e.g. when MP of rajya sabha died or resign in mid of his tenure and after that election were held to complete his remaining tenure same as we need these process for lok sabha or for state assemblys.
If we agree with your point of view then it will lodge extra burden on economy.
Suppose a govt falls before 1 year and election held govt form.
After an year once again re-election.
@@amitjaiswal3891 No.. any extra burden because at present election were held within a duration of 6 moths we can extend this limit to 1 year like in j$k. Or depend upon state to state like u.p. need more capital and other hand goa need less capital
@@sachinpopandiya3521 I'm sorry sir!
But I don't understand what are you trying to say?
Are you saying about extension or anything else?
Simultaneous election started from the start of first election but because of disruption this situation is now.
In my point of view simultaneous election are not possible in a democracy like India..
What if a particular party or alliance do not get the absolute majority in this case will entire elections be reconducted..
The respective House will elect the PM/CM and this means all parties can vote for the candididate ( Will require Amendment to the 10th Schedule) . If no PM gets majority, parties can reach an agreement to have their own PMs for varying tenure within the 5 years tenure. However, even if that cant provide for a PM, Nothing except reelection and thats a nightmare.
Yeah, the idea of one nation one election is really great and it will going to benefit entire country because when it comes to elections in India we have seen that in every 4 to 5 months there is election in some part of India and here instead of focusing on governance Many political parties focus on politics. And I think we Indians are actually very mature when it comes to Lok Sabha and assembly election. One thing we can do that Just like in USA first, we can have Lok Sabha election. Once the election is completed we can move towards the assembly election. Let’s say in May 2024 the Lok Sabha election get completed and in July or August. When the results are out we can have assembly election for all the states and UT. So this kind of method can give enough space to all the national and regional political parties. Now the entire elections are completed within the span of 4 to 5 months and remaining for 4 1/2 years will be focused on governance.
What if we change the tenure of legislative assembly to 5 years??
there shouldnt be a knee jerk reaction to synchronize the terms of lok sabha and state assemblies. the reduction of time period between lok sabha and state assemblies should be done in a phased manner. Those state assemblies which have re election in 6 months of time before or after, should be first tried to synchronize with lok sabha election
according to my opinion, all state elections should happen at one time and central election at other time providing a gap of two and half years between them. this clearly would be acceptable to all regional and opposition party who are currently fearing that one nation one election will favor the national party. also the federal structure of constitution will be safe and complexity will reduce.
not possible with parliamentary form of govt
The Pros are very beautifully analysed but the cons are not given similar weight . A balanced conclusion is missing.
one possible solution for holding the simultaneous election is fix the tenure of the state legislative assemblies and lok sabha . And if there is dissolution of state legislative assembly or lok sabha happens then impose the president's rule( if remaining tenure is short) and if the tenure is more than 6 month then the new election should be held for respective state or center and elect leader for remaining term and then after 5 years new fresh election and the process keeps moving.
- It is against the federal structure of india.
-And will also led to to centralization which is not healthy in Democracy.
-And also the frequent election led to the accountability of politicians which will eradicate with simultaneous election as the elected parties may tend to 'sleep' for next five years without any tension.
As far as overwhelming expense of political parties are concerned, there can be cap fixed.
Its a very good move where political parties will put national interest first. Divide and rule will end. For few state benefits nations interest is compromised.
Actually one nation and one election means one election held in a particular period. No body is dissolving Rajya sabha. Hence regional issues can be amptly addressed. It was in practice till 1970 in india. Its bcoz of indira gandhi it disintegrated.
Let's suppose it is implemented. But we have multi party system which form coalition government and it's not possible to maintain full tenure in the both lok sabha and state assembly always and suppose it dissoves in mid of tenure. At that time again same problem will arise.
Take the simultaneous elections and announced result when state assembly dissolved....
Thanks RSTV
My prospective:
If this applied..
1. it will be really bad for already existing small regional political partis.. and I think after this, no new party can emerge
But for the sake of 21st century.. new ideologies are must in India, those who will focus on 'developmental politics' instead of 'political politics'.
2.And, as par as the cost of election is concerned, check the expenses by the political parties on last election. Numbers were mind boggling.
3. What if, there would be a coalition govt and after 3 months, it fail? Would there be president rule for next 4¾ year?
Now BJP is in majority, that doesn't mean it will last forever.
Against Ballet paper election
idea😂😂
EVM 🙄🙄😂😂
I don't think that local issues would be overtake by this system. We have example of odisha and some other state where people voted out for local assembly in different manner and voted for general assembly in different manner
North India is not the same. North India go with the wave. Odisha and Andhra is clever and they took a stand for national interest not with religion and castes.
It's not like north india go with wave since most of north india is being rulled by national parties so it happen but you can see just three month before bjp lost three state and just after three month in loksabha election bjp did almost clean swipe in two state and won 7 seat out 11 in third state
@@faltuvichar Because they were unfair the whole elections. Several MLA and MP broke the model code of conduct even the PM. They have 5 times the Money than the other parties combined. The IT cell was cleverly formed that it promoted the undone work too. Too much socialising through social media where the youth is right now. I really don't have to say much. The influence social media gave to this party and the media which asks stupid questions . Facebook anaytica. Same here. There was a main course here. Religion. The politics killed democracy. Giving the seat to pragya Thakur is an example. Everything revolved around religion and for them Hindu is supreme. Hindu is just a word. Nothing more than it. Even educated people are not seeing it through...The damages done due to this issue. Everyone wants money. Selling their souls. So much power...I hope it kills the source.
@@ankit8305 I am from bhopal only and you know it's very stupid thing that some can win election by just influence of social media . Congress has also very strong IT cell in bhopal they called special team from JNU to accelerate the campaign of digvijay singh against sadhvi prgya thakur and all 9 minister from his quota were doing campaign in bhopal seat only they didn't go any where else in madhyapradesh he floated money like any think but from very first day ever since ho got ticket it was declared he will lose election. He was the CM of MP for 10 years and very powerful leader of congres same time he is very corrupt and defamed . He always does politics of minority appeasement and he forced to congress to give ticket to people who were involved in riot like arif masood who hacked the hand of police man on road when digvijay was CM and he got free . If you say sadhvi prgya is terrorist the he is the bigger then her
Frank bro please give some time for them to speak..by creating hurry we might miss main points...u have limited time I can understood but getting information fullfledgely from limited people is far better than getting jzz repeated reviewed opinion by more people! It's my advice
If one person staying in Mumbai.he have voting rights at Nagpur..What is the system of Election to vote in their area...What is the solution for this.
Tenure of the loksabha nd state assemblies should be fixed.. or If any assembly desolves before the completion of tenure the new govt.should be elected for the rest period of tenure only...so that concept of one nation one election can't be violated... such kind of provisions should be made in the constitution...
India believed in a accountable govt and not a stable govt.
one more question
doesn't it collude state and national issues and affect the results in favour of national issues and mainly helping the national party and regional party will be ill-affected??
Genuine question
Don't think so considering that Indian voters have been smart enough to prioritize issues at regional and national levels and accordingly choose the parties at both levels.. Case in point being rajasthan mp whr Congress formed govt at state level yet bjp swiped ls elections
Ur right I partially agree with u other side is that the elections which u r talking about has a difference of about 6 months so it could be differentiated easily .
The point is most of our voters(those who vote) are illetrate and poor they could be disillusioned by the name of national leader to vote for that national party in regional elections ???
What are ur views on this
@@aniketghanghas430 the illiteracy has been a major problem but even then considering the vibrancy of our democracy I think that end of the day even regional parties cash in on their leaders name.. Take case of Telangana cm.. There r lots other examples.. So national regional doesn't matter.. All parties are same to cash in leaders name.. Problem is that even literates don't ask or question their representatives. . That should be changed.. Illiteracy will take little More time to solve in our case but that cannt be excuse for everything!! Just my 2 cents of thoughts since u asked :)
@@aniketghanghas430 and not just raj mp.. Even simultaneous elections held in sikkim.. Andhra.. Odisha.. Regional leaders won state assemblies.. Thr ws no 6 months gap!!
One Nation One election
1.संविधान में संशोधन की आवश्यकता,किन्तु राज्य विधानसभा भंग की स्थिति में क्या होगा?
अनुच्छेद 83(लोकसभा का कार्यकाल पांच वर्ष के लिए),85,172(विधानसभा का कार्यकाल 5 वर्ष के लिए) एंड 174में संशोधन की जरूरत होगी
2.संसदीय प्रणाली में प्रधानमंत्री लोकसभा के प्रति उत्तरदायी,अमेरिका की तरह राष्ट्रपति पद्धति लगाकर समाधान हो सकता है,
3.सर्वप्रथम सभी राजनैतिक दलों से चर्चा की आवश्यकता।
4.दुगुनी evm/VVPT की जरूरत,खर्चा बढ़ेगा किन्तु 5 सालो में होने वाले विभिन्न elections की तुलना में overall खर्च कम हो जाएगा,हर 3-4 महीनों में आचार संहिता लगना बन्द होगी और development होगा
6.पांच वर्ष तक विधानसभा और लोकसभा काम करेगी औऱ चुनाव होगा तो वोटर के लिए चुनना आसान होगा कि कोनसी पार्टी बेहतर है।
7.विधानसभा चुनावों के कारण केंद्र सरकार कोई बड़ा निर्णय नही कर पाती(राजनैतिक मजबूरी)
8.लोकसभा/विधानसभा का कार्यकाल निश्चित कर दिया जाए,5 साल तक(एक उपाय )
i want to write some point on one nation one election
advantages of one nation one election
1-saves crores of rupees that also useful to development of our country.
2-those person who will prime minister save own time for election rally's and that time use for country.
3-election time corruption will be control.
4-election made like country's festival like Diwali every one will going on its own village,town,city to celebrate and that day success for democracy and possibility will more than 80 percent voting. and most important is that no dummy voters on their.
such a one sided debate...wasn't a well rounded debate
One nation one election will be good for nation. So many shops in the name of regional parties will close which hv been only blackmailing for coalition & hindering the pace of development & looting treasury in states bcoz tgey know national parties r dependent on them for coaltion.
I have complete solution on "one nation one election". For conduct lok sabha , all state vidhyan sabha and all local bodies election on one day ,we have to decide the one standard date .For our understanding we can take 10th May 2024 where all election should happen.
And simultaneously next standard election date automatically fixed which is 10th May 2029.
Now the problem arises where any constitution assembly dissolve.
If any assembly dissolve
a) within 3 years of election then re-election should happen and elected government will be hold office upto standard date (10th May 2029) or
b) after 3 years of election then president rule will apply upto standard date (10th May 2029) .
for implementaion of one nation one election contitution amendment is require
Disappointing. None of the panelists discussed the demerits of a simultaneous election.
1. In Parliamentary form of election, voter loses the control over his MP/MLA once he/she is elected. The intermediary elections give the voters a chance to check on the politicians.
2. Most of the time, voters vote for the same party in center & state. A common man can barely distinguish between national & regional issues, priorities & vote accordingly.
3.This system is more beneficial to parties rather than people or the country as a whole.
4. This would further the nuisance of fighting election on persona rather than issues.
5. If we are spending 3k crore on a statue, expenditure is certainly not high in our priorities.
Divide the states into two parts and put the elections in every 2and half years. It is very useful to the people because people represents are do their job in a good way otherwise they will ignore the people
Amazing 😍
good initiative
Modi ji will ultimately go to make India a nation with semi-presdential govt like Russia or France. A full presidential govt like USA or Brazil won't be possible because of the SC judgement on basic structure of constitution which establishes a parliamentary form of govt as a basis.
Good points by Ashok Tandon
👍
Presidential system sound good...
All politicians of India especially MLAs should be made to go and visit their respective winning areas once every 6 months till 5 years personally and compulsorily...
If this happens only than India will change otherwise India will never change..
Definitely.
Lot of assumptions in this comment
Well said bro.
But no old parties will do that. New parties are needed in India.
@@somdeepkundu2506 80% of politicians don't work at all for 5 years but lakhs of rupees are invested on them per month which is direct loss for the country.
That's why even if they don't work they should be made to meet people regularly so that there is some connection between voters and their representatives...
I support 'One nation One election'
Bhai aisa nahin hona chahiyeh because agar aisa hoga to all indian states autonomy ki demand karne lag jaayege goverment se 😨
Arent the leaders of the LS and the assmeblies still chosen bh its members, constitutionally? If they talk of members independently the leader, if ONOE, is applied, wont that require a change in the anti defection law?
Great if elections will indicate by one as election.
Politicians especially MLAs should be made to come and visit their winning areas once every 6 months personally and compulsory till 5 years..
Yes it need to be done with rule.
@@SachinGupta-ci6xc ya there should be rule on this. They should come to meet and answer public regularly and not only during elections..
Panel quality for rajya sabha tv discussions also deteriorating now. None of the panel memebers are expert, making just general statements which everyone understands already by common sense. Please don't degrade your quality.
former advisor of the election commission is not an expert on elections??!
@@dallassmith230 yeah just like old beurocrats from really old batches don't sound contemporary, in the same manner the panel does not sound like experts.
I think elections can be fixed after every two years not before that.
Suppose if 4 state govts period is expiring in 2020 and if we exceed its tenure for 2021 and if another state whose tenure is expiring in 2022 and we curtail it's tenure one year to make 2 year simultaneous election.
This idea will work in every situation.
No logistical money expenditure.
No need of presidential form of govt.
Once this type of formula is applied then if any govt. falls before it's tenure then we merge it's re election in upcoming simultaneous time of election.
My personal thinking is that in a country like India with so vibrant culture and unique type of federal system, one nation one election is eutopian thought on ground it is not possible..
presidential form can not exist in my country
If elections are held only once for 5years...we can our legislatures in our constitutency for once in 5years
It creates more gap between people and legislature
This one nation one election can only benefits the political parties
Saves taxpayer money?
@@dallassmith230 people dont bother abput political and bureaucratic corruption but will talk about jus saving 100's of crores for conducting elections...
i showed this to Arnab Goswami, he is contemplating retirement now
That bastard pretends to work for the country is a bigger threat than ISIS.
Well that's his way u can't change that.
There are also several other concerns, people who oppose ONOE argue:
Simultaneous elections are against the federal structure of the Constitution. It forces the voter to think of national and state issues at the same plane, and will take away the gains made by regional parties over the years and favour national parties, they say.
Amending Articles 174 and 356 - which deals with ‘Provisions in case of failure of constitutional machinery in State’, or President’s rule - will alter the basic structure of the Constitution and will impinge on federalism.
The international examples given by those pro-ONOE - like Sweden, Belgium and South Africa - cannot be compared to a country like India, whose population and area is many times that of the smaller countries.
Dilution of Tenth Schedule - the anti-defection law - will lead to horse trading.
ONOE is not feasible: if a central government that is made up of a coalition faces a situation where an ally pulls out, and the government falls, elections will have to be conducted in all state governments, too, within six months, even if there is no issue in those states. And vice-versa.
Argument about MCC paralysing policy making is overstated and untrue - it only stops ruling parties from using the government machinery for electoral gains.
You can read the Law Commission of India’s report on the issue here.
Election k baad fir se election ki baate, mtlb desh me kuch bacha hi nhi hai election k fir election uske baad fir se election.
Parliamentary form of govt is basic structure no??
Yeah, it is! Bringing about Presidential form of Govt. would alter the basic structure of the Constitution.
Yes
One nation, one election is important in India because it saves money and time.
Sathya prakash -👍
The debate was one sided
- the multi party system of India will changes to bi- party system in next 20 years
- federal structure of the nation will be changed
- by just taking expenses of election , one can't change the basic structure of the ind . -The total expense of election will be only some % of fund spend for schemes , why you can't spend it for election
- if you want to control expense , put a limit cap on parties for electrol propaganda.
Nothing negative points have been mentioned. Are the penalist pro govt.????
Specially Tandon ji.
One nation --two elections is better than jamili elections
Fixed term makes sense.
I had a lot of respect for your prog. but now a days the quality of debates is degrading. even Satya pradesh didn't speak much.
"India being in election mode always", well, this also allows for more accountability of political parties.
Stalling govt policies n dev n corruption
Increase govt Job in India for development
Wo unse nahi hoga. Inhe development cahiye Ram Mandir pr. Not on students
Satya Sir Thanks U R Awesome......Jay Maharashtra ♨️
A Ashok Tondon Modi Ka Chela Hai Sala .........😅
.....♨️Jay Maharashtra♨️.....
Aisa nhi hona chahiye
One nation, One election is much needed! It was happening till 1967 then why not now. The first 4 General elections were all synchronized with Assembly elections then why not now?
Please disqus on 1 nation 1 channel।
Bihar se dhyan hatane ke liye Naya rag ched Diya gaya hai।
Loksabha aur assembly ka term fix kar do
One nation one election possible ho jayega