R27ET vs FLARES! || MIG 29 SMT || War Thunder Dev

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 19 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 19

  • @Schmitz_
    @Schmitz_ ปีที่แล้ว +14

    honestly i would still stick with 2x r27er and 4x r73

    • @jameswiththeM6
      @jameswiththeM6 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I go with r73/r27er/r27et

  • @UberAllenSS
    @UberAllenSS ปีที่แล้ว +9

    ECCM: yes
    Me: "trust"

    • @SauronBaggins69
      @SauronBaggins69 ปีที่แล้ว

      ECCM has nothing to do with flares

    • @Jazzyo7
      @Jazzyo7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@SauronBaggins69 By War Thunder's logic at least, yes it does. On the stat card of the INFARED missile it lists ECCM instead of IRCCM as it should, so leave the guy alone.

  • @tartzmir7934
    @tartzmir7934 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Russian Gatewidth IRCCM is much more potent the closer it is, so I wou;d recommend you to stick with the R-73s for closer engagements, they pull hard and they don't fly too fast making them Ideal, plus they almost never get flared when fired at ranges below 1km

  • @kampsie1841
    @kampsie1841 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    warthunder gunna have to buff this if they think we would give up the R27ER for this crap

    • @Takemura76
      @Takemura76 ปีที่แล้ว

      Lol this missile isn’t meant to be used this way. It’s an amazing missile. Haven’t you played the mig23?
      This thing with the IRST will be worse than the aim54 spam. No warning, just smack!

  • @eaststarling7805
    @eaststarling7805 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    "Russian Bias is real guys:
    Russian bias:

    • @Takemura76
      @Takemura76 ปีที่แล้ว

      What a video of someone using a missile incorrectly is proof Russian bias doesn’t exist?

    • @Jazzyo7
      @Jazzyo7 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Ah yes, using a long-range IR missile in extreme close range like an R60 is proof of no Russian bias.

    • @flynntaggart8549
      @flynntaggart8549 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Jazzyo7 that's irrelevant to what this video is showcasing. the stat card for the r27et states that it should have ECCM, and yet it appears they did not model this at all. so this missile is effectively useless compared to the r27er.

    • @Jazzyo7
      @Jazzyo7 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@flynntaggart8549 A few clips near the end show it's ECCM pretty well. Ignoring all the ones firing at front aspect and at way too close a range (both pretty bad scenarios for the missile), it's ECCM works pretty well, my friend never had any issues with them on release. You have to remember though they're more of a sneak attack missile with a crazy long range. Yes the ER is theoretically better as a RADAR missile, but with everyone ball dragging on the ground the ET's are not a bad pick. The main issue in the video was firing it has really bad angles or way too close for a long range missile, the ECCM would probably handle a lot better if the missile was fired more at range.

    • @ZERetRet
      @ZERetRet 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Jazzyo7yap

  • @user-ub8bn4wq6y
    @user-ub8bn4wq6y 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Р27ЭТ хорош только в том случае если вы догоняете джет ровно на шести и если он летает ниже, чем 50м над уровнем земли, радарные ракеты бесполезны на таком расстоянии от земли, но тепловая ракета которая движется 5.8 махов не даст шанса врагу выпустить лтц, меня они спасали, но очень редко и сейчас беру только р27эр, выше 50м они кошмарят все, что угодно кроме дождя из аим 120

    • @JFIESTASR
      @JFIESTASR  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@user-ub8bn4wq6y Вы правы, в таких ситуациях это очень хорошо.

  • @Main-itt
    @Main-itt ปีที่แล้ว

    SSSSS