5 Reasons Why Blender is better than Cinema 4D! | Cinema 4d vs Blender Part 02
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 พ.ค. 2024
- We just released: "The Ultimate Introduction to Arnold 6 for Cinema 4D",
gumroad.com/l/NYmLN
Our Weebsite: mographplus.com/
Our Store: mographplus.com/shop/
Our Gumroad Store: gumroad.com/mographplus
5 Reasons Why Cinema 4D is better than Blender! | Cinema 4d vs Blender Part 01
• 5 Reasons Why Cinema 4...
"The Ultimate Introduction to Arnold 6 for Cinema 4D" :
gumroad.com/l/NYmLN
"Comprehensive Introduction to Corona for Cinema 4D" Course:
mographplus.com/product/compre...
or ON Gumroad: gum.co/nXrrk
"The Ultimate Introduction to Arnold 5 for Cinema 4D" :
mographplus.com/product/the-ul...
or ON Gumroad: gum.co/PPYFf
Our Facebook: / motiongraphicplus
Our Twitter: / mographplus
As a long time C4d user , Blender has really come a long way , its no longer a hobbyist tool , its really good and superb.
The power of opensource. Imagine that Microsoft decides to make MS Paint opensource as well. Some programmers will pick it up and ad some more features to make it less crappy. After some more years more users will pick it up and so do more programmers. Within a mather of time a whole comunity would make Paint a worthy competitor to Photoshop. Because that is how open source works and why i love it.
@@2009heyhow I love the new blender , its like having a free mansion but with that mansion I get an Audi ,a Mac-book pro etc.You know what I mean.
i was learning on C4D and like it a lot, but its over priced and moved to using blender and i am hooked on it and the community. no more proprietary software again, open source is the only way to go now!
@@worldofbeats22 Absolutely, i really am enjoying 3D again with Blender :O)
If only blender will adopt C4D learning potential and intuitive UI, it will be used not only by hobbyist. Now it is kinda more like Modo - fun to play around a little, but thats it.
Obiously,
both are better than 3d max
lol
haha :))
Can you do destruction?
Can u do udims?
@@rajdarshanr6335 There is additional addon(I think google it i just found it right away) that support udim.
As I know blender can perform basic destruction. Not sure about high quality destruction like 3d max rayfire.
You are correct
Comparing a free program with paid addons for a paid program.
Blender also has addons.
And its biggest part is the community.
MageZ - Why are you people coming to this video being so combative and argumentative? It’s a simple comparison video. If you love Blender with all your heart, then use it and be quiet. He has the right to express himself and you people seriously need to calm down.
@@KingKenTM i am just saying that he is coparing addons of a programm to another programm is weird.
MageZ - Which I understand. But to start thumbing all his videos down in solidarity because he made a simple comparison video is wrong.
@@KingKenTM that is why i don't do that. This is a good video. I never hated any of his videos nor disliked it.
don't forget Blender has free Octane and Pro Render engine addon and X particle is integrated. no need to pay for even paid addons
blender 2.8 is just the beginning..., future is bright for blender :) ....node-based particle system is coming, node-based animation is coming :)
Animation 2020 & Everything Nodes. With so much done in Blender in just the past year, imagine what could be done with more than x2 the resources focused entire on only these two aspects.
@DALi pay for what?
@DALi Blender is licensed in a way that it cant be selled ever
DALi and future. It’s open source. Even if Blender itself would change to paid model. Anyone can take the stage just before that and branch off and continue development.
@DALi Blender is completely free to download use and create with (which means no creation/copyright/term of use licenses that most softwares can legally employ). You may help out the Blender Foundation with donations but you are not in any way obligated to. However, it's current success is because of the community's support.
I have Blender installed. But I struggle with it because I am so used to using C4D. I feel like there are only so many hours in the day, week, month, etc, and so many hours left in my life that to spend them learning an entirely new3 package is painful (even if it's better). I feel like I could be learning new skills within c4d to add to those I already have. As good as I have gotten with C4D, I would prefer Blender if I was starting from scratch.
Fair enough especially if you are on a tight schedule
I think u could learn blender if u want to but not in a serous this is going to be replacing c4d way but just to know how it works, honestly if ur good at one 3d software learning a other shouldn't be that different, but thats if u want to learn blender if not then thats good too
If you're good and comfortable with C4D then stay with it! What is limiting you?!? There is no objective better or worse in this league!
The good thing some people can use both blender and c4d. Im a blender user and at the same time learning C4d but i still perfer blender since its free and capable of doing alot and also has a guru ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
C4Ds full integration in AE is hands down my favorite feature as a daily grinder in motion graphics. That and mograph is the boots on the ground pragmatism that isn't comparable.
AE becomes too slow when importing straight from C4D in my opinion.
I use AE a lot and that is truly one major strength of C4D over Blender. It will be interesting to see what the future brings.
The great thing is that since Blender is free, it’s easy to use both (that is if you already have C4D)
Enrico Piazza slow? Mine is really fast. U need beefy cpu.
Yup Cineware is amazing. Makes it really easy to do advanced compositing. In a Perfect world i would use Nuke or Clarisse iFX but I can’t justify the cost just yet.
As a c4d user and new to blender i would suggesting to change the title of the vid to ...
"20 reasons blender is better than c4d"
coz these 5 reasons are not enough at all.
with all respect to U and ur channel which i like so much bro.
😂Someone please pin📌 this man.
So you will get 100 reason C4D far better than shitty Blender.
What about MoGraph? I'm a noob to this world, but I've heard C4D is really good at MoGraph, animating stuffs, etc
@@minwuan5768 yeah blender has some bugs (fun fact the first computer bug was a moth) but cinema 4d has also bugs. In blender you can correct this because it's opensource (in cinema 4d oh I find a Addon for my problem wow 300 $).
@@minwuan5768 You can always spot that one person that has never actually used Blender
You forgot Ubsoft and Epic Games pouring money into Blender's development, DAILY bug fixes and builds, superior sculpting (which will soon blow the doors off of everything not named Zbrush since Pablo is working on it), and not to mention the production of numerous short films, games, even a feature film.
Yes, blender is getting better and better every day, and the release of 2.8 made it amazing and is getting more advanced than other 3d programs and it is NON-PROFIT.
I love Pablo. Can't wait for 2.81 and 2.82 sculpting changes
Cinema4D is easyer to use for me :D The only resone why i am still using it.
Not everyone can pay for a perpetual license
@@pansitostyle Well, you can use it without paying for it.
@@your-username-here2308 Legally ?
I feel like c4d is harder; Blender is more modern as well
@@4nlimited3dition_4n3d no 😂
There is also mantaflow, a fluid simulation tool comparable with real flow, that does smoke, fire and narrow band fluid simulation, already on testing on a separate build of blender, and is expected to join the main program on version 2.81, in a couple of months.
Instead of fighting over this, I use both of them.
you can also use cel-shading etc in your 3D in blender, blender is also getting an upgrade to its fluid etc with flip fluids, you can buy another flipfluids addon which are just a couple of things.
The major problem I have with ANY open source software, be it an OS (Linux) or 3D Graphics (Blender), is if something goes wrong with the software, there is no direct support from the developer and the only solution is to "wait until the next version).
For this you have paid support. RedHat sell the RHEL for a lot of money so you can call a guy to go to your place solve your problem if needed.
Some other unique Blender features?
* Dynamic Paint
* The modifier system
* Integrated Python DOM scriptability, right through the whole app architecture
* The driver system
* “Animated everything”, where you can alter parameters for materials, modifiers, constraints etc right through the timeline
Just a few off the top of my head...
C4d user won't hate this video. We are looking into alternatives where c4d is weak at. Maya is awesome, Max is inspirational. I say blender is the new kid on the block. He learns fast and adapt fast and is friendly and helps freely where the other big bros on the block chage a buck or two. The annoying thing is the hotkey are so different and I know there is the switch to c4d kinda hotkeys but when you follow along with tutorials that does not help. I wish blender was better at following industrial standard w, e , r , t and alt keys and middlemouse button from the start.
Blender has come a long way. As a long time 3ds max user I'm amazed of the stuff available in Blender 2.8 still missing in expensive software like 3ds.
Multi object modeling, multi object unwrapping, vertex parenting, bendy bones, sculpt, grease pencil, volumetrics, best ipr in any 3d software, best and most custumizable UI I've used, nondestructive bolean - array and chamfer modifiers, best node editor I've tried, great rigging tools too and let's not forget EVEE. I've already used evee in numerous tv commercials. No more rendertimes, a real game changer. And Octane is free for Blender.
Only place Blender is lacking is particles & vfx.
Just to add to this I also belive that eevee would work great in a node based game engine such as what armory 3d is trying to do
yes exactly no one outside of the blender community has any idea including industry pros who when they see are shocked at how much is in ther.. particle systems vfx will improve as well as everything nodes, the new particle system is coming along with manterflow 2.81or2.82 but its here... animation 2020 will resolve as much for rigging animation etc as has been done by pablo on the sculpting and painting side of things.
Can you please make a comparision for the API interface and expandability?
Cinema 4D has always been the king of 3D Motion Graphics. That's where its strength lays.
True!!! It's always easy to do motion graphics in C4D. And for that Blender made use of Animation Nodes which I think is also cool!
better modeling and sculpting too
@@mrmachine5632 That's debatable
just give up believe me no software compares to free
@@yodancristino yeah👌
It´s missing the fact that the in the new 2.8 version the user intarface have been upgraded and modified to offer a more user friendly aproach, specially for the beginners!
Friendly? I was so confused when I first started to 3d model
@@dphang20 Everyone is confused when they start modelling in any software. It's called learning. But yeah, Blender is known for its notoriously steep learning curve but give it a couple years, and I reckon it will dominate the competition.
Yup, 2.8 is what got me loving Blender...it's past versions had the worst interface ever, that's why a lot of people hated it, and didn't want to use it.
@2:12 Blender's video editor is not just used for basic editing as you said. As for the smoke simulation, I believe mantaflow in blender is coming to change all that.
Momoh Nyaley yes but it’s available today. We can only compare current features. Not any IF and future features.
@@litjellyfish I see your point. But I saw someone using it in a tutorial.
@@litjellyfish Its always available not just included in the main release.
@@litjellyfish the feature was ready to merge on 2.8 already, butwas cut out due schedule to that release. It's going to be on 2.81, only a few months away. And there is the build you can download and use already, on blender.comunity/graphicall
Libertim Produções ok great. Still I state that at the time of this review it was not included.
Blender (other 3d software as well of course) has always had a strong “modding” community.
Still if we look at products from starter pov it think it’s important to base it on what is included as default. Many users that want to start out with 3D is not so technical.
I think this I the area Blender now is advancing most. The UX is more standard and simpler. Without sacrificing to much of speed out workflow.
And with the extra focus and funding I think Blender will be a very well balanced product both on features and UX (and I mean even without a lot of extra add Ona so just deafault Blender) un say 3 years.
I just started using it. Have given some tries over the years but it has to much UX differences from other products so I did not feel giving it that time.
Now with 2.8 i directly got in with little effort.
I hope to be able to contribute with UX feedback / reports and maybe even some code to push.
Like there is still many small legacy details (say how cursor states is handled is very inconsistent) maybe those small things is not super important but I always feel the devil is in the detail. And with more UX designers contributing to the product the more coherent and easy to learn and quick to use product we will have. :)
Is it true octane is free with blender and does it work with MacBook pros?
I started with Cinema 4D in 2013. After two or three years, I switched to Maya, because it was (and still is) kind of the industry standard. As I started using Octane for rendering, I switched back to C4D, because the integration of Octane was that much better.
Last year, I also learned some Blender. I realized just HOW good it was. Nowadays I use Blender for pretty much everything except a few minor things that still work better in C4D. This program has really come a long, long way.
What do youthink now after blender 3.1
I am still in Cinema and I have just started to know Blender, I have been keeping track of it for a decade and I think this is the time to start the transition, Cinema is becoming more expensive every day and still requires many accessory purchases, I suppose it took me one Two years later, I will completely switch to Blender but it is my chosen destination, I do not think that I will completely stop Cinema 4D, but I do think that it will stop being my main tool, and although Blender should improve in some ways, the truth is that it is beginning to Enroll in the industry little by little and Blendermania can only improve.
Dude it's not because of the blenderers that you get those dislikes it's because the fact that you literally comparing blender with c4d add-ons the only argument that it has better mograph system but not the best as you mentioned that award goes to Houdini
i agree
I thought Houdini was for Simulation.
@@jascrandom9855 simulation and sort of technical modeling, very math intense
@@kendarr Everything Nodes might make Blender (almost) as good as Houdini in that department.
You people have too much time on your hands. At the end of the day, paid addons or not, Cinema4D’s quality is better. Will Blender improve in the future? Most likely. But he’s doing nothing but stating facts. If someone comes to your for work, they’re not going to care that you made an entire subpar project in one program, they’ll look for quality. Stop attacking this man and grow up. That’s like saying a render isn’t good because it needed OctaneRender to look that good and Octane costs so much. Who cares? It’s about quality at the end of the day.
Thanks for video, what is better in aspect of polygonal modeling - blender or cinema? Спасибо за видео, а что лучше в плане полигонального моделинга - блендер или синема?
I want to make an animation short film ,like any studio Ghibli's film , Which Animation Softwares are the best?
Blender, Krita, or pirate Toonboom or Adobe Animate CC
I like both of your videos on this topic. As a Blender user, I held my tongue when you said you'll make this video after the first one. I could not complain about your 5 points in "Why Cinema 4D is better than Blender". I love Cinema 4D as well, and you're not wrong.
This video however, is very flattering for Blender and Blender users. You're correct with all your points here as well.
A little off-topic, but something that I can see blender eventually adding is AutoCAD (Engineering-based) software at some stage as well as improving its video editor. If we could build using sketches for use in manufacturing machinery and such, and simulate the systems with fluid dynamics or active-animation dynamics, that would be amazing - yet I can see it happening (Obviously in the long term).
Imagine I was designing hydraulic systems and could simulate actual material properties, fluid and pressure with active animation rather than static colouring (similar to fusion360). Then render and put it in a product pitch in the same software. I can see blender becoming the leader across several computerised animation/development/design fields.
s and a couple EDM and Dubstep goals for myself, and I guess I better start learning sowhere. Thanks for the great vid!
the biggest advantage of c4d is its easy to use ui/ux, i have never seen any software more easy to use than c4d
Correct.
I never saw a easier software to use as Blender
Woot never knew FumeFX was being released for C4D! Hows it compare to TurbulenceFD?
It's in open beta so you can enlist in beta testing and try it for free
Best reason is open source.
I used Cinema4D, 3ds Max, Maya and I'm using Blender recently. Cinema 4D is a great program, There are still some features in the blender that the basic parts are not implemented. However. The best thing about Blender is that it is the fastest growing software, and users around the world are actively involved in developing Blender and revolutionizing the open licensing program. And now Blender is compared to Max, Maya, Cinema4D, Houdini and others. The only open license program is Blender. The more you use it, the more you expect it, and the more you use it, the more affection you have. Personally, Blender is the only such program.
Grease Pencil is a Beast for 2D animation. I've some cool stuff done with it by Independent artists on Twitter, even when it was in Alpha. There's a French animated movie called "I Lost my Body" in Cannes now that was made entirely in Blender's Grease Pencil! How insane is that!
I always wait for your videos
Having 3 render engines is crazy! Eevee and workbench render in seconds, as well as cycles getting more features to enhance the render
You can also get Disney renderman for free, and octane
@@kendarr wait w h a t
@@ibrahimt.1730 And the new LuxCore and YafaRay and AppleSeed. Those are all awesome render engines in their own ways. But I think Cycles is still the best for most use cases, being so fast and well integrated.
@@4nlimited3dition_4n3d You can use it for preview a hq render, but for a final export, octane is the way to go (renderman will kill your pc lol)
@@talkysassis Can you elaborate, what features does Octane do better than Cycles these days? I've tried Octane in the past but didn't really find anything specific that stood out.
Also Blender has quite good texture painting mode so you dont have to use Substance Painter or other external software for texturing and painting on your models
4:04 I’ve heard people say you should call Cycles “path-traced” rather than “ray-traced”. But I don’t see why we need different terms just for different stages in evolution of the same basic technology.
which one is better for character animation,short films and all that?? Anyone?
Very good camera track and sculpid tools with dinatopo, Better UVW tools, paint PBR on a mesh, Workbench and the multiple way of seen the shade in viewport and render It right away, create and animate trees easily, archipack to create archviz procedurally, drag and drop images as planes, multiple objects editing, copy and paste between blender files, alt B to hide and show masked in your viewport... And so on
One best case that no one has ever included it that it can utilize OpenColor IO features using ACES configurations. Haven't rendered something out of it yet but it's sounds great!
the default colour option that Blender is set up to go with Filmic, and can be set to others as options. :o) comes also with Open EXR fr image formats
Thanks vor the video. Since C4Ds subscription model i am not willing to pay monthly PLUS being trapped using C4D only while paying. Considering to switch... meanwhile i use R21 as long as possible.
Blakey Don't stop making soft. I wished I started as early as you. You have a lot of years to learn!
it depend on what you work ? you don't mention in your video! for me best chose c4d the mograph and compositing with after effects no other application have it ,
Particle system! Its really worth in blender, and the geometry node base system ❤🔥
Why be mad... just love the tool and learn from both
For Motion Graphics which is best c4d or blndr
Both is cool
I'm a Blender user. Cinema4d is probably the best one for motion graphics compared to Blender or any other softwares.
The question is not which is the best, but which one you identify with. I've tried several and blender is where I can take a job from start to finish without any major problems.
What you should have talked about at reason #1 is the fact that a 3D open-source piece of software usually seen as a hobbyist tool is even comparable to this massive industry-standard giant. Blender sure has come a long way
Placing and scaling Materials & shaders on objects in blender and unreal sucks. C4D is so intuitive here with a gysmo in texture mode just scale and rotate like you want for simple structures. And the new UV Editor in C4D is just superb.
Are you going to be making a comprehensive introduction to cycles in Blender 2.8?
Oh my god sensei is here!
Let's be honest. It's just a matter of time before something like Tyflow is either integrated in Blender or as a plugin. A complete vfx tool with cycles and real time EVEE will be hard to beat. CD4, Maya, 3ds max etc will be in a very tough position.
I agree. Still I am a little tired of the “future” talk. Maya, C4D will also evolve.
@@litjellyfish will envolve bit just slower and you have to pay more for the add ons
I can't wait until Blender is released on the - X B O X O N E X -
@@litjellyfish maya and 3ds haven't evolved in years compared to Blender and Houdini.
@@JayJapanB lol
Sculpting and UV's tools are also superior in blender!
You use the application that gets the job done. If Mac Paint gets your job done than that is the best app for that job. I never understood why people argue over this stuff.
this fucking music oh my god my head what is this? a soulless copmany commercial? god
Half of the reasons you picked kinda irrelevant. I’d say my top 5 would be 5: incredibly robust sculpting tools 4: finished modeling and uv tools 3: grease pencil 2: render engines that have powerful industry standard shaders and work with both major vendors even if you mix them 1: very powerful native particle system 0: it’s free ps: been using both for over decade in studios and for personal projects and ended up ditching C4D completely in favor of blender+ Houdini. Checking what’s new in c4d every year and keep being disappointed. Oh also Linux support is a huge +
C4D user for many years and today for the first time I downloaded blender. It's time - it's so bloody good now. Only thing I'll keep hold of C4D for is X-Particles. X-Particles has come SO far in the last two years that it's a real heavyweight particle engine now. Insydium are legit one of the best companies I've had the pleasure of buying software from - I really hope they one day decide to bring their awesomeness into Blender.
A new particle system is on its way in Blender so you may be able to completely thro C4D away
Gary Parris lol 😂
Was background music really necessary?
Does anyone here know how to make a good cloud in blendr
box ..volumetric ..noise texture
What you present seems the enthusiasm of a blender user , frankly with the 2.80 version blender has come to age meaning is a serious choice for Professional Artists out there not only serious hobbyists at best , other than that this presentation is more like open source vs closed source , indeed C4D is a better choice for small studios and independent users but that also means other closed software usually coming from Adobe Corporations as a whole the package is harder to learn and the workflow does not seem smooth unlike blender but it is up to what you want what you need what needs to be done , Both Philosophies are quite interesting and if you like the graphics and animation field with enough time and brain investment both philosophies are most promising.
fire video, thanks bro
In soft One, there is relatively little although I will say soft One has so fantastic features and I tNice tutorialnk it is going places (Rated No 2
Seriously you will have to remake this video especially your Stimulation part cuz that feature has been added to c4d R21
and in next blender update dev's add new fluid sim solver and new smoke/fire sim. And new particle animation system
21 is not out yet, so maybe next year he might make a new video on this topic.
Blender now has the Mantaflow system for particle and fluid simulation.
@@jascrandom9855 And it is absolutely amazing already in 2.82a. I tried simulating ocean waves and it handles it no problem. It's also multithreaded properly now.
I had over 4000 finished commercial work done in C4D. so its worth it to pay 3k for a software.
Still tryna to model a chair in Blender on and off. hik hik hik XD
ok so an expert in C4D but cant model a chair in Blender? with all the free tutorials out there? sounds like you're resistant to change or have no time? even a simple chair in Blender is like possible within a few seconds to a few minutes depending on your skill ability. I have seen a lot of so-called industry Pro's try to just use Blender as they would Maya, and other packages, did none of you experiment or use tutorials or other resources to work in those clunky and confusing applications? or are you just resistant to Blender and learning it?
Holy shit, this is either fake or this guy is incredibly stupid. Someone must be holding their hands while learning c4d.
@@ZBBBlL exactly
A lot of studios still use Cinema 4D over Blender, though... which is why I still feel like I'm obligated to learn it anyway, lol.
But aside from that, yeah Blender is definitely an amazing tool for something that's free and I've seen people make high quality stuff with it and point out how it avoids some of the minor headaches that the industry standard tools have. Just a shame that more studios aren't integrating it into their pipeline... though I don't really understand why since it seems like everyone and their dog is using it now, lol.
what do you mean cinema4x doesn't have a video editor? don't you make videos with it?
I probably would have different choices for 5-2, but you got #1 exactly right.
What would those Choices be?
@@jascrandom9855 I don't know C4D well enough to make an ordered list, honestly, but my favorite thing about Blender is it's lightning fast workflow, consistency, and light weight. I love its modelling tools, of course. EEVEE, Freestyle, and compositing make Blender the best tool for NPR, all in one package. Its rigging and animation tools are the best I've seen (although I only really know Maya's for comparison). And the Python API is powerful, flexible, and accessible.
All-in-one-ness is a huge feature, because even if it isn't the best for a particular task, I can save time by skipping import/export issues. It's good for prototyping.
@@josephbrandenburg4373 C4D is mostly known for Motion Graphics, and having the easiest learning curve out of all the 3d software. But yeah, in everything else, Blender kicks ass.
Lol! Didn't need to take it so serious.
blender 2.8 не способен открыть файл skp что легко делает Cinema 4d что меня огорчает(((
I think that the ruling in this case needs some time, with the opportunity for all companies to show their full energy and desire to serve the product and the customer, especially after Blender appeared free and open source.
I am a graphic designer and 3D Motion designer for more than 20 years.
I did not find a 3D program more complex than this blender.
All of its tools are very complicated compared to Cinema 4D
ok so... with blender you can do simple things the hard way ;) you just need HUNDREDS OF NODES !! VERY EASY MAN!!
If you are a graphic designer or motion graphics designer, C4D is for you, on the other hand I hate C4D for 3D modeling.
You just need to know first your needs before you choose the software.
C4D has always been a good, and easy modeler...I always found it fun, except the boolean system...where the object is hidden instead of being a true subtracted booleaned object for example.
yo le di varias oportunidades a blender, pero es poco intuitivo, si bien hay muchos tutoriales, no es tan facil como cinema 4d, yo he aprendido cinema 4d muy facil, casi sin tutoriales, y si bien no soy profesional, yo creo que mis modelos son buenos, pero cuando trato de usar blender es un suplicio, me da dolores de cabeza, ansiedad, entre otras cosas mas que satisfacción, no he podido hacer nada, he hecho una prueba con mi amigo a ver quien modelaba antes un hidrante para ver que era mejor, mientras que el se tardó 4 horas, yo solo me tardé 1, y ninguno de los dos somos expertos pero llegamos a al conclusión de que cinema 4d tiene mas herramientas y es mas facil de usar que blender, lo digo como Argentino, prefiero pagar 2000usd en un programa que me va a ahorrar dolores de cabeza y me dará mejor flujo de trabajo, que no gastarme nada y estar toda mi vida estresado con blender
It's funny that there's rarely any mention of Maya in the thread lol
Sculpting?
Reasons better than other leading 3D programs
1. It’s free
I don't want to say which one is better than other. Every tools has their pros and cons. But the current Blender features and tools are better than the previous Blender. In my opinion, Blender has a lot of pros than others.
blender or cinema 4d best for architectural visualisation ?
nope , 3ds is the best
Cinema4d all the way. Add corona render and you have best archiviz app
3ds is unstable app and you can have serious issues with working file if it crashes... avoid that app
My only reason is, *its not 100 dollars a month* and *people who use C4D say it isnt that expensive*
And yes, I'm aware the annual is 60 dollars. *Thats still expensive*. AND YES, im aware about the trial.
i know as a fact its better then c4d, but i have learned so much there and its so comfortable and blender just looks so hard to use and stuff im not gonna switch :D
Then why you keep using Cinema 4D
I dont know why hobbyists and single PC users have it in their heads that they could possibly achieve production level smoke or explosion simulations that they see in blockbuster movies. The differences in processing and memory availability between say weta or ILMs studios and your home PC are orders of magnitude. So yea maybe you can achieve production level smoke simulation on your PC if you are happy with a rendering wait time of about a year.
Nowadays is totally possible archive in 1 computer not so expensive the same results than any major studio. Sure, you will not have a renderfarm, but overnight you can get a serious explosion going on.
Unless you are renting a Virtual Machine or Render Farm.
I worked with Maya, 3Ds Max and C4d. I have to say Blender is my favourite.
Hobbyists: 5 reasons forks are better than spoons
Pros: it depends on the task, all tools are great for what they're made for
Number one is a cop out
Please make - Why Houdini is the daddy of all 3D softwares!
cI FER the G O A T 👍🏻
You should have focussed on the modelling toolset in Blender. A lot of Cinema users are looking at Blender for modelling as Cinema's toolset hasn't had advancement since the polygon pen. And don't get us started on Cinema's UV tools…
@Spenser Dickerson I use Rizom too, but you still have to create a UV map in cinema first, then export to Rizom, make a map, import to Cinema etc etc. And Rizom is based on the Max / Maya tools. Cinema is a graphic designers 3D application, so a modelling toolset is gonna come second to a feature that allows unlimited creativity - Fields / volume modelling - that's ok. Just that after every iteration, users are crying out for better fundamental tool overhauls and they just don't get better, so naturally the users will start to think 'ok, no updates to the UV editor, I'm gonna have to look elsewhere. Same for modelling' and then tools like Blender are more valued, and they grow…
The most funniest line of the video was : Now it's time for cinema 4d users to get mad at me😂😂
If Professional Renderers such as Arnold, V-Ray, RenderMan, Octane become available in Blender?
It will be a revolutionary switch to Blender.
octane is available
in blender now
Those title cards.... 🤔 Are you fellow student of "Master Do". lol. (chris do)
I used Cinema 4D, houdini, blender, maya, 3ds max I use Zbrush as my main tool, unreal, substance painter. I don't think blender is better than Cinema 4D i do think they are different. C4D is a big tool for motion graphics and if I have to say one software that is better than those is houdini Fx. It's just a beast, not for the thing you can do as a final result but for the versatility that nodes give you. If you learn how to use houdini fx without using presets you can change the output at any given time without loosing any information. Just for that houdini is the best 3D tool for motion graphics you will have.
Hy please tell me that which software is best for 3d cartoons?
Sorry for my bad English
It's sad you don't have much Blender content on your channel...
i know nothing about C4D; what's the community of its users like?
the blender community is superb
I use C4 since 2005, I even have installers 8, 10 and 11.5 versions, I tried to master the Blender several times because it is free. But it only leaves me with bad impressions - an inconvenient, illogical, confusing interface. And the first time I sat down for C4D in 2005-without any instructions, using only my intuition, 3 days later I had a ready-made commercial project. I mean, people have different logic, so there are different 3D editors, and everyone has their own fans.
and it still cant bevel complex edges properly
One Reason that Blender is better than C4D is at Animation Track Naming :/
It's always a mess to know where to name my new animation take instead of "Root|CINEMA_4D_Main|Layer0"
The kid is grown up now and it is a time to leave Cinema 4D and learn Blender. Why? Cause it's becoming better and better on a daily basis. That is evident and the exponential growth can't be ignored. Their code is being constantly optimized and simply said, It works fluidly, utilizing the hardware in the best possible way (the power of the open source and the community development vs. the corporate approach which is a profit driven and lacks innovation and optimization compared to the power of a community development driven by passion and creativity). Imagine a lazy giant interested only in a stock prices, money and licences (Cinema 4D) and a thousand working ants caring and sharing the most progressive technology today (Blender community)... what do you think, who is gonna create a better software at the end? ;)
how you can compare a free program with a very expensive one
You can compare, just use the two. Blender is free but it development is really strong thanl to the donations and subcriptions. To see a change in a pay software you have to wait a long time. To use an add on on a pay software you have to pay even more