Cambridge's Lost Trams

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 12 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 138

  • @johncassels3475
    @johncassels3475 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I thoroughly enjoyed that video. I grew up in Cambridge many years ago and had always heard of the horse drawn trams, but never knew much about them. It was a treat to see photos of the city old and new. Thank you.

  • @damedavidfrith55
    @damedavidfrith55 2 ปีที่แล้ว +31

    Very informative and a shame we ripped up trams and rail in a blindness for cars that we now can’t afford to even drive

    • @RediscoveringLostRailways
      @RediscoveringLostRailways  2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      If nothing else they would make for a quirky tourist attraction!

    • @ccjelley2390
      @ccjelley2390 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      people would rather go hungry than get out of their cars which they'll always be able to afford. just take a look outside.

    • @neiloflongbeck5705
      @neiloflongbeck5705 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      The problem with trams is that they are fixed to set routes whilst motor buses are fre to go wherever there are suitable roads. The problem with rural railways was the stations were often a good walk from the village they served meaning that when buses came along they lost passengers (even in the pre-grouping days stations that didn't earn enough got chopped, Beeching only accelerated the pruning). And when the cheap motor car came along the public voted with their feet and bought cars making the railways redundant. Society though that the ease of movement that their own car represented was more important than a railway, tram or bus service. It takes a generation or more to see the damage done by a decision like this. So I wonder what our children and grandchildren will be criticising us for doing that seemed so full of promise when we made it?

    • @RediscoveringLostRailways
      @RediscoveringLostRailways  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@neiloflongbeck5705 thanks very much for your thoughts

    • @sarahmiller4734
      @sarahmiller4734 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@neiloflongbeck5705 Some people, even today, might criticise privatisation, not just of the railways but also the electricity, gas and water networks.
      It seems that many people thought that privatisation would reduce costs for consumers instead it seems that the opposite may be true.

  • @gordonmcmillan5556
    @gordonmcmillan5556 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I worked on Kings Parade in the 1990’s. The council dug up the road to lay setts for the new loading bays and disabled parking. Under the tarmac they discovered the tram tracks and wooden blocks that made up the surface. Sadly I think it was all sent to landfill…

  • @mirutanable
    @mirutanable 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    so much info packed into a small episode... i loved it all the same... especialy the added background sounds of the horses and trams whilst you were on the move

    • @RediscoveringLostRailways
      @RediscoveringLostRailways  2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I must admit that in making my films of late, one of the things I've really enjoyed is sourcing the sound effects!

  • @michaelpilling9659
    @michaelpilling9659 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    A fascinating video. Wonderful history lesson which you obviously researched thouroughly. I guess not many people who travel the routes today know much about the history right under their feet. I think your excellent film will change all that.
    Thanks again for all the hard work you put into the making of your videos. Can't wait for the next one.

    • @RediscoveringLostRailways
      @RediscoveringLostRailways  2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Glad you enjoyed it and it would be great if the former presence of these trams is a surprise to people!

  • @peterlewis7292
    @peterlewis7292 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Brilliant, I said it would be and you must have been up very early even on a bank holiday to film an empty Lensfield road!
    If you're interested there is a replica section of Cambridge tramway at the Cambridge museum of technology, Riverside, Cambridge (The former Chedders La. pumping Station) the other interesting point is the tramway didn't use what I will term standard bull head rail section, they used a T section, almost I section, on the top flange there is a groove for the wheel flange to run in. The area between the rails and an area on each side were wood blocks, as far as I have been led to believe made from Canadian redwood, about the rough size of a house brick.
    Now for a bit of trivia, when Cambridge allowed the operation of a sight seeing bus to operate in the city, around 1990's (?) an argument against it was that passengers would be able to see into student accommodation, the same cry used when they were planning the tramway 100 years earlier!
    Thank you so much for your time to make this interesting film.
    Rgds. Peter

    • @RediscoveringLostRailways
      @RediscoveringLostRailways  2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Really glad you enjoyed it - to my shame I've never visited that museum and I' only round the corner. Thank you for the facts and information as well as the trivia - much appreciated!

    • @peterlewis7292
      @peterlewis7292 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      My pleasure, I have often wondered if you're local to Cambridge.
      Many thanks again.

    • @neiloflongbeck5705
      @neiloflongbeck5705 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      That sounds like standard tram rail.

  • @stephenlongthorpe3812
    @stephenlongthorpe3812 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I believe there was an resistance, from the University, for the horse tram system to be converted to an electric traction system. It's was also the same story in Oxford. Who only ever had horse trams which never develope into an electric system. A common belief at the time, by the well to do class. Trams would help the poorer classes access their exclusive high class areas. Thanks for a great tram story, I hope you can do more.

    • @RediscoveringLostRailways
      @RediscoveringLostRailways  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      My pleasure and thanks you for the information regarding the university and its undue influence!

    • @stephenlongthorpe3812
      @stephenlongthorpe3812 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I went to a talk about Blackpool trams. St. Anne's on sea was a "Posh' resort. The town council refused Blackpool trams through running into their system. Because would make it far too easy for the "Rif-raf" to travel there. So, trams meet at the boundary to exchange passengers.
      Just been studying my home systems Leeds, footfall for buses and trams form 1938 to 1966. Any city would love to have 250 million journeys a year in 1950 (105M buses and 148M trams). Three years later the council announced the closure of the tram system. A system with the most off road running, than any other city. Some new housing estates had brand new track built as late as 1948. Plans for an underground had already started, before the war.

    • @SportyMabamba
      @SportyMabamba 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      The posh still reject public transport to keep out us poors. The residents of Chelsea are dead set against a Crossrail 2 station on Kings Road even though the area is chronically underserved by public transport.

  • @peterrivet648
    @peterrivet648 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    You haven't mentioned one of the distinctive features of the Cambridge horse trams, which was that they operated on the 4 foot gauge, rather than the standard 4ft 8 1/2 inch one. This is now very rare (I think it's only found on the Glasgow Underground in the UK) but it was at one time used by quite a lot of tram systems, especially in East Lancashire. It offered the benefit that other horse drawn vehicles didn't try to take advantage of the tracks as their wheels were spaced wider apart.

  • @Andrewjg_89
    @Andrewjg_89 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I probably would see that Cambridge might need trams but it does have a guided busway which could extend from Cambridge to Huntingdon, Newmarket, Bedford and Peterborough. Taking over some of the former and closed railway lines.

  • @michellebell5092
    @michellebell5092 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    An very interesting and well made film. I think a tram system along the lines (!) of my local and highly successful Croydon system would be of huge benefit to serve Cambridge and the surrounding towns and villages

    • @RediscoveringLostRailways
      @RediscoveringLostRailways  2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Agreed - I think that some kind of metro system would offer a variety of benefits, but, alas, I suspect no one wants to pay! Thanks for your kind remarks about my film.

  • @johnhall6993
    @johnhall6993 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Excellent video - thank you. As a resident of a village close to Haverhill, I lament the closure in the '60s of the railways in the area: so incredibly short-sighted. It amazes me that despite the building of logistics units and much new housing in Haverhill, the only means of transport westwards towards the A11 and Cambridge is the A1307 - a poorly laid-out and regularly lethal road.

  • @ianr
    @ianr 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Excellent video again.
    Had to look up Hobsons Conduit, something else I have learned about! 👏🙂

  • @sicksneaks
    @sicksneaks 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    If they had kept the existing rails that now run the Cambridge guided busway they could have used trams would have been cheaper 🤔🧐🌝👍

  • @dyuman3983
    @dyuman3983 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Brilliant work as usual!

  • @brianmicky7596
    @brianmicky7596 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Hi , It's always good to see yesterday, and what it was like, I wish we could go back to them days , not much pollution, (just mind were you put your feet) All the Best Brian 🤗😎

    • @RediscoveringLostRailways
      @RediscoveringLostRailways  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It would be fun to hop back in time and give these a ride! Many thanks indeed!

  • @michaelharris-gifford2414
    @michaelharris-gifford2414 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Another great video. Interesting timing as we're nearing completion of a downtown tunnel LRT project, here in LA (Regional Connector).

    • @RediscoveringLostRailways
      @RediscoveringLostRailways  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I've heard about this - I wonder if such a thing would have a place in Cambridge?

    • @michaelharris-gifford2414
      @michaelharris-gifford2414 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@RediscoveringLostRailways It could, but it's not cheap. It has the advantage of being faster than surface/street, but inevitably means few stops and less direct connectivity with businesses on the surface

  • @robtyman4281
    @robtyman4281 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    It should follow Oxford, and charge drivers to enter the centre of the city. Think it's up to £10 a day there now. Not as much as London, but still cities like Cambridge, Oxford, Bath, and York are tourist magnets and jam packed with tourists in the summer months.
    Air quality is becoming as serious an issue in these four smaller cities as it is in large cities like London, and Birmingham.

    • @andrewreynolds4949
      @andrewreynolds4949 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      That’s only effective if there is a reasonable alternative. Otherwise it just drives away business

    • @JasonCliftJones
      @JasonCliftJones 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      And in Cambridge, there isn't. If you live in nearby villages, you're already looking to other towns and cities for shopping due to the cost of going into Cambridge.

    • @RediscoveringLostRailways
      @RediscoveringLostRailways  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Many thanks for your thoughts!

    • @andyrob3259
      @andyrob3259 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      And a way to hollow out the centre. What we fail to understand and some people can't grasp is that cars are going no where. It's a fantasy too think people are just hanging out to give you their vehicles. They're not and they will cut back on eating out before cutting back on the car. And fees like that just hand over business to other towns etc. Cambridge has nothing in the centre that you won't get elsewhere. So what you need to do is create a public transport system utilising several modes. I honestly cannot see what use wrong with old park and rides. They work perfectly.

  • @malcolmrichardson3881
    @malcolmrichardson3881 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Intriguing and informative video, with nice sound effects! With so many visitors, a tram system seems long overdue.

  • @timdaugherty5921
    @timdaugherty5921 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Oh I am so happy!! A new video!!

  • @CaptainScruff83
    @CaptainScruff83 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Well done on another great video nice to have a bit of a mixture in your series, have you ever visited the tram museam at crich it's a fab day out.

  • @jeffjordan8182
    @jeffjordan8182 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Another excellent video. I thought you integrated the “Readly” message very tastefully into the work.

    • @RediscoveringLostRailways
      @RediscoveringLostRailways  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank you - first time I've carried sponsorship after a number of offers, but I actually really like this platform, so to speak!

  • @MervynPartin
    @MervynPartin 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Very interesting video. I wasn't aware that there had been horse trams in Cambridge.
    I have visited Cambridge many times, by car for the Corn Exchange Theatre, which was the nearest theatre to us where Runrig have performed and also by train for Addenbrookes.
    It one of the most car hating cities that I have visited (speed traps everywhere amongst other things to annoy drivers), but I think the chances of a decent Metro are remote. Despite having all the scientific expertise on their doorstep, the council would only make a hash of it, like they did with the guided busway.

    • @RediscoveringLostRailways
      @RediscoveringLostRailways  2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Glad you enjoyed the film. Yes, very congested city. A metro system seems unlikely, I'd agree!

  • @cmtwei9605
    @cmtwei9605 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wow, what a discovery! I was there for 6 years and lived in Lensfield Road opposite the chemistry building for a couple of years, walked up and down Regent Street but never knew about trams. But I had a ride on the local tram last evening in Hong Kong where it's been running for over a century.😊

    • @RediscoveringLostRailways
      @RediscoveringLostRailways  ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes, the trams are not well known in Cambridge! I too have taken a ride on the trams in HK back in 2009 and enjoyed it immensely!

  • @cheeseysponge944
    @cheeseysponge944 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Is it possible to do a documentary on the march to St ives line?

    • @RediscoveringLostRailways
      @RediscoveringLostRailways  2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yes it is! Let me look into it...

    • @cheeseysponge944
      @cheeseysponge944 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Nice to know, sorry I forgot to mention that past Chatteris it gets a bit harder to follow.

  • @spencer_who1659
    @spencer_who1659 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thank you for another great video. Working at the train station I would have loved to have seen those pods scooting around the city.
    It would have also been great to see a possibility of the CAM going out to Mildenhall and Haverhill and re linking these towns back to Cambridge.

    • @RediscoveringLostRailways
      @RediscoveringLostRailways  2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Whilst I am not surprised that the CAM did not bear fruit, I think it was a very interesting idea and enjoyed the ambition of the scheme - it would certainly have been good to connect the city directly with these former railway towns!

    • @Nukeguy909
      @Nukeguy909 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Eh, they seemed more like glorified taxis. Cambridge really needs a proper steel-wheeled tram line. Though even without that, the city is small enough that just putting segregated bike lanes on all major roads would likely be enough to make getting around the city a breeze

    • @hesterclapp9717
      @hesterclapp9717 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      What's the difference between a city congested with pods and a city congested with cars? Just because you don't own them, doesn't make them good public transport

    • @AquaMoye
      @AquaMoye 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Pods would certainly not have been great.

  • @rodnelson2651
    @rodnelson2651 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I studied at Cambridge for 3 years and had no idea that a tramway ever existed there! Very interesting and nostalgic film, thank you!

  • @willswheels283
    @willswheels283 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thanks for that interesting video, I never knew Cambridge once had trams!
    Well I do now! Another well researched and put together piece of work, thankyou.👍

  • @cabowerks3973
    @cabowerks3973 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great video. Wonderfully narrated and edited as usual! 😁👍❤️ It certainly seams that a re-installed tram or new electric busway is in order, but as you said time will tell.

    • @RediscoveringLostRailways
      @RediscoveringLostRailways  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank you for your kind words about my film - I think some form of metro system may well be useful, but, alas, I think the money will not be forthcoming...!

  • @peterlewis7292
    @peterlewis7292 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Dear Lost Railways,
    When I used to live in Gt. Wilbraham many years ago, near to the junction of the current A11 there was a filled in railway cutting running parallel with the A11 heading south on the western side of the A11, past the Fulbourn/Balsham Rd. Charter bridge junction. On the old A11 near Abington on the Eastern side of the A11, close to the entrance to Granta busines Park there is what looks like a crossing keepers house,
    Question, do you know where this line went or any of its history?
    Unfortunately I don't have a detailed Ordnance Survey map which might show it.
    Regards, Peter.

    • @RediscoveringLostRailways
      @RediscoveringLostRailways  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks for your message. I think you are describing the Newmarket and Chesterford railway which was a very early closure indeed, shutting as it did in the 1850s. I strongly recommend a website called RailMapOnline which details the route of all UK railways past and present. I hope that's helpful 😌

    • @peterlewis7292
      @peterlewis7292 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@RediscoveringLostRailways
      That would be about right I seem to think there was an alignment down a bridalway the other side of the village.
      Many thanks for your time to reply.

  • @HesterClapp
    @HesterClapp ปีที่แล้ว +2

    We don't need pods
    We don't need a busway
    We just need transport which is actually like ... good

  • @sturmtigerking4263
    @sturmtigerking4263 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    As always, great video with many facts. Bit different to railways. Keep it up!

  • @alistairshaw3206
    @alistairshaw3206 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Much that I love the Douglas horse tram in Isle of Man, I'm afraid that they are outdated.
    I have been in many cities and think the Manchester tram system is brilliant. A few years ago we went on the tram from the city centre to the East Lancs Railway, what a great journey.
    The Glasgow Trams were shut down in 1962 so I was too young to remember them, another great system.
    Another interesting, well researched video, another winner!

  • @paulhaynes8045
    @paulhaynes8045 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Very interesting - and a nice 'deviation'. I spent a few days driving around Cambridge last summer - only my second visit - and was rather disappointed with the messy combination of buses, guided buses, student buses, etc. We had originally planned to drive only there and back, using public transport whilst there, but I'm afraid we ended up going everywhere by car. If ever there were a city crying out for a modern tramway systen, this would seem to be it, but I guess the cost only would put paid to any such plan.
    I'm no expert, buy my theory is that modern tram systems only really work where an area already has a lot of abandonded or under-used railway lines, which can be incorporated into a tram system relatively easily - and which provide high speed travel from the suburbs into the city centre (e.g. the Croydon system). The actual 'tram' part of these systems (the most expensive part to build?) tends to be only a small section in the middle of the city. The same is probably also true of metro systems like Newcastle's - essentially the same thing.

    • @RediscoveringLostRailways
      @RediscoveringLostRailways  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank you for your comments, kind words and assessment - with which I agree - I think 'retrofitting' a tram system to the centre of Cambridge would be very costly and risk causing more problems than it would solve...

    • @hesterclapp9717
      @hesterclapp9717 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Cambridge has no shortage of old railways: the varsity line and Huntington line are now guided busway (which should have been a tram from the start), then there's the stour valley line which could serve Linton and Haverhill again, and the line to Mildenhall through Bottisham

  • @snubby4624
    @snubby4624 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great video RLR!

  • @onlycompetitions5083
    @onlycompetitions5083 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    A horse-drawn tram system would, I think, be an enormous failure in a modern city environment. For the conveyance of fare paying passengers, the lack of speed might be a severe inconvenience. And the City Fathers might look most unfavourably upon the invariable plethora of ‘horse-muck’ littering the roadway.
    I also, had to look up Hobson’s Conduit.
    Another fascinating video show.

    • @RediscoveringLostRailways
      @RediscoveringLostRailways  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Many thanks - and agreed - horse-drawn trams would not be viable in Cambridge today.

  • @MrVxrman
    @MrVxrman 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I enjoyed your latest video very much.
    Thankyou for all you do for us 🙏🏻
    All the best 😊🍻👍🏻

  • @tomwatts703
    @tomwatts703 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I was very much surprised to see my hometown on that proposed CAM map, having not heard of the proposal before. The road between there and Cambridge is a traffic nightmare (especially during commuter times), buses take a very round-about route and the busway passes nowhere near the town; since East West Rail will most likely pass too far south to be viable for daily commuters, I feel like a tram network would've been a good solution to the traffic and environmental concerns.

    • @RediscoveringLostRailways
      @RediscoveringLostRailways  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks for your comment - I think that something needs to give with this situation - and a tram network of some description might be the answer.

  • @Kulla1berg
    @Kulla1berg ปีที่แล้ว +1

    interesting facts, was surprised it was closed so early as 1914.

  • @anthonymoore6009
    @anthonymoore6009 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Good informative as ever. As the tram system was never mechanised it was always an early candidate to be killed off by buses but it ran on rails so even now would be better than that grotty guided bus obscenity.

  • @a11csc
    @a11csc 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    great vid

  • @michaelmiller641
    @michaelmiller641 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Yes I did enjoy that!

  • @johnjephcote7636
    @johnjephcote7636 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I always marvelled that Cambridge held onto horse trams beyond the date at which other corporations had electrified.

  • @TickledFunnyBone
    @TickledFunnyBone 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I could see something as small as the original tram electrified and maybe even an electrified original for the history of it there.

  • @1258-Eckhart
    @1258-Eckhart 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    That came with a free tour of Cambridge city (I'm a bit of an urbanite).

  • @andyrob3259
    @andyrob3259 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Those proposed but cancelled projects at the end were nothing more than gadgetbahns designed to woo councils that they were making 'green wonderful' decisions while feathering developers pockets. You could use a quarter of that on a simple bus with bus lanes.

    • @RediscoveringLostRailways
      @RediscoveringLostRailways  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think there's a lot of truth in that - imagine the 4.4 billion price tag would've quickly doubled!

  • @andrewreynolds4949
    @andrewreynolds4949 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Cambridge could use a tram system, but at least they didn’t waste £4.5 billion on “autonomous pods.” Those wouldn’t be any better than cars

    • @RediscoveringLostRailways
      @RediscoveringLostRailways  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes, although there were some striking concepts, at least two of them would still need to use existing roads...

  • @barrythedieselelectricstea5217
    @barrythedieselelectricstea5217 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    it's ashame trams were taken out of service they were cleaner quieter bit like the trolley buses in the 50 and early 60s we in thanet had trams which ran all over thanet we had tram sheds at st peters broadstairs still there today now shops and at Westbrook nr margate sadly demolished a few years ago

    • @RediscoveringLostRailways
      @RediscoveringLostRailways  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Many thanks for your thoughts and comment!

    • @mbr5742
      @mbr5742 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Rail based transport has a problem with flexibility. If the traffic pattern changes it requires major rebuilding efforts or make the use of the system inconviniet and time consuming. Public transport works best in shuttling large groups of person that all go to one place at one time. Say factory workers of a large factory from the workers housing district to the company and back. Works less well in modern times with more liberal work hours and smaller/more distributed work places.
      Electric busses with overline wires require a bit less work but the power network and the wire infrastructure needs to be build. And until recently combined buses that could also run independent of the overhead power lines where typically diesel as backup due to the weight/power ratio of lead-acid batteries. Diesel in start stop operation are not the best choice. These days some new options are there but initial investment is high due to low demand.
      And that is all "within one city". Add a tendency for suburb live and work in city a, live in city b and you add to the problem

  • @pauldawson3951
    @pauldawson3951 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Our next door neighbour is the last surviving family member who owned the Cambridge Tram company. He has the pictures on his wall.

    • @RediscoveringLostRailways
      @RediscoveringLostRailways  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I do hope they have an opportunity to see and maybe even enjoy this film - thank you for your comment!

  • @AustNRail
    @AustNRail 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Sydney Australia is spending AUD$10.6 billion on a 24 kilometre tram following existing roads and heavy rail route. Really? $441,666 .67 per metre? Less than a foot step and it costs that per foot step?

  • @robertcoleman4861
    @robertcoleman4861 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    🤠😎😁

  • @michaela.chmieloski3196
    @michaela.chmieloski3196 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Cambridge is no different than any major metropolitan city here in the United States, scrapping the steel-wheel-on-steel-rail mass transportation system in favor of the "modern", oft-times-individual, conveyances with their rubber tires rolling on macadam. The city may have done it sooner than most, but the end result is still the same. Also, I don't buy that "no viable means could be found (for electrifying the system)" nonsense: where there's a will, there's a way.
    That Cambridge Autonomous Metro sounds akin to Boston, Massachusetts' "Big Dig" subterranean highway project. Not only did that latter boondoggle dig deep into the ground under the city but so too into the private-sector taxpayers' pockets with its massive cost overruns. Of course, one deadline after another for completion came and went year after year. You folks should count your lucky stars that the (s)CAM was cancelled.
    Very nice restoration of car Number 7. Too bad it isn't in use on a tourist operation.
    Well done, RLR, thanks again for another educational presentation.

    • @RediscoveringLostRailways
      @RediscoveringLostRailways  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Really glad you enjoyed the film and thank you for your thoughts - given the ambition of the CAM scheme, I can imagine that the £4.6 billion figure would've been met and exceeded very quickly - anything that involves tunneling only means investors and taxpayers have to dig deeper!

  • @rolandharmer6402
    @rolandharmer6402 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Look at Ghent. th-cam.com/video/sEOA_Tcq2XA/w-d-xo.html
    Cambridge’s population is around 129,000, Ghent’s population is around 260,300

  • @jimward8095
    @jimward8095 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Payback for most city's insacialble appetite for the motor vehicle....oh please take me back 70yrs when we already had in place a workable transport system?

    • @RediscoveringLostRailways
      @RediscoveringLostRailways  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      If nothing else I'd like to go back and ride the many lost branch lines from Cambridge!

    • @mbr5742
      @mbr5742 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Let me guess - you lived in the core city. Because onoy there it worked in the 1970s. If you had to go from rural town to city - one option per hour between 6 and 18, one each two hours until 22 o'clock then nothing until 6.

  • @Scots_Diesel
    @Scots_Diesel 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    First

  • @hypercomms2001
    @hypercomms2001 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Arrogance breeds contempt... we in Melbourne Australia never was so stupid and never ripped up our tram network and have kept out and developed it....

    • @RediscoveringLostRailways
      @RediscoveringLostRailways  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I think it was less arrogance and just lack of use and then no wish to continue paying for maintenance, butbi could be wrong.

  • @peebee143
    @peebee143 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Enjoyed this video, thank you!