Tom Campbell: Faith, Religion, and God in the Big Picture

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 604

  • @Arthuriantimes
    @Arthuriantimes 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    For me, this is one of the most important, helpful interactions of Tom's Big TOE. Tom's TOE model is actually the most unique, advanced, helpful original perspective of existence in the last 1000 years. It is the only model that has helped me deal with existing in an uncertain reality.

  • @cosmiccheetah6906
    @cosmiccheetah6906 8 ปีที่แล้ว +51

    Ben Franklin once said, "To see by faith is to shut the eye of reason." Great video, Dr. Campbell.

    • @lettersquash
      @lettersquash 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      You can lead a cheetah to wisdom, but not make him think.

    • @snacklepussPSN
      @snacklepussPSN 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Have you verified Dr Campbell is or was a NASA Physicist? If not; you are also seeing by faith:

    • @91722854
      @91722854 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      how do u lead a cheetah to wisdom? one sentence is often where pop-philosophical stops and avoid further explanation.

    • @rtanidean4931
      @rtanidean4931 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@snacklepussPSN Why would that matter to the message he presents? Thx.

  • @twcjr44
    @twcjr44  11 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    For the most part, I have consciously pursued my growth.

  • @kroeran
    @kroeran 11 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    One of the benefits of learning Tom's metaphors is that it creates a shared language that not only unifies the traditions of the east and the west, but most importantly, creates a basis from which to understand Quantum Science and unify the intuited with all that is measureable in big science. Jesus, Buddha and Tom are pointing at the same reality, but Tom's metaphors are the new wine and new wine skin of the current era, which needs your support.

    • @digang7
      @digang7 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      👏🏼 👏🏼 👏🏼

  • @stephenwilliamson5300
    @stephenwilliamson5300 6 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Why can’t everyone be as open minded and realistic. Thank you Tom.

  • @twcjr44
    @twcjr44  11 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    From the perspective of fear and ego, the idea of giving unconditional love falls somewhere between terrifying and irrelevant and appears to not make practical sense. Also the concept of forcing oneself to have love for anything is impossible. If force is required, it is not love. Why would one want to become love? So their life will become happy and productive, meaningful and satisfying, and significant and powerful as they move from being part of the problem to being part of the solution.

    • @consciouscleaning3146
      @consciouscleaning3146 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      ❤❤❤

    • @chaykha89
      @chaykha89 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank you for making things easier to understand and more practical to use in my daily life. But I was wondering about something. If we are in a virtual reality and we are information and consciousness is the large system with which we share information then even though consciousness is everything and it is evolving and expanding through us, it couldn't be the creator of this virtual reality since also it isn't perfectly evolved and is finite. It could be a creation just like us, inside this virtual reality,in order for the game to expand and reach higher levels.... I don't know really, it is just that I think that any game or movie or virtual reality thing has to have a creator. that's why my question is, consciousness is a creation to interact with as a tool for this reality to expand or is it the creator? The reason I emphasize on the word creator because things have to have a beginning. They can't just be there . I would totally understand consciousness and how it is related to us in this virtual reality let's say in a creator mind, in a creator system that is enjoying the game he created, but it has to have a precursor for all this if we don't want to call it creator. ( excuse my humble thinking as I am not a scientist like u are. English language is not even my native language so excuse me if I am expressing myself in a primitive way)

  • @tacymusicman
    @tacymusicman 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Mister Campbell, from Newton to Einstein, I haven't met a man that explains "the reality" better then you. Peace and love :) Thank you for the tools you just gave us :) Hopefully, many people will see this.

  • @judyhuey1157
    @judyhuey1157 8 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Very refreshing listening to him!

  • @iwastoldtherewaspie
    @iwastoldtherewaspie 8 ปีที่แล้ว +32

    Just discovered these videos. Holy shit this man is a genius

    • @mikegrand
      @mikegrand 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Mtg
      Lkllllllllllłllllllmmmkkkkkkkkkkkkkkblllb m.
      Mmm mmm


      H

      M
      l
      Njjjjjjoj ohhjjjjj

    • @rickynelsun1078
      @rickynelsun1078 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Genius is understating Tom Campbell!

    • @megarachne3000
      @megarachne3000 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      no other word for it.

  • @eliort404
    @eliort404 5 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Its difficult not to ”belive” everything this man says. Although i will have an open mind until something better comes along😅. I just have so much respect for him and what he does for us, the mankind. Thank you sir❤️❤️❤️

    • @rtanidean4931
      @rtanidean4931 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Trust in You. Carry on 😊💚

  • @kroeran
    @kroeran 11 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I think the key is that most economies are free enough such that if you focus on your own game, you can get done what you need to get done, materially.

  • @twcjr44
    @twcjr44  11 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Yes it is. Ego is self-awareness in the service of fear. The awareness of separation, of ourselves in a VR, does not have to engender fear, but initially it often does. Eventually we grow up to enjoy our self-awareness without fear or belief (i.e., with love if we evolve positively). Because we learn that even though we are separate in our VRs, we are still one with All That Is, still connected with everything -- a solution to simultaneous cooperative oneness while being individual.

    • @elad520
      @elad520 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi Tom, did you soley use Robert Munroes sound meditation therapy to access different states of consciousness? I've also heard you say your able to do this in a 10th of a second at this point after learning through sound I can only assume? You are at the point you don't need the sound to access different states of consciousness. My struggle lies in gaining focus to the point of interaction in a flow. Slowing down interpretation enough to gain focus in order to conceive it at that level. I try to do it every night while dreaming but its not until after I wake up I realize I was unable to carry over that into the waking state. Also through meditation I gain a different perspective through the darkness of the back of my eyes in which I slip in and out of consciousness states but unable to gain a clarity to hold onto it. Besides consistent practice, do you have any other ideas that maybe able to help me achieve an alternative state as you and Dennis and others have been able to achieve? Thank you

    • @nobodyspecial5250
      @nobodyspecial5250 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Religious belief and spiritual faith are not the same thing!

    • @nobodyspecial5250
      @nobodyspecial5250 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Skepticism is not a fruit of the Holy Spirit!

  • @ogbare32
    @ogbare32 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I completely agree with Tom Campbell this subject, i feel he is a messenger from the higher conciousness.i will encourage any right minded human to share this video to any loved one .

  • @stevieclark556
    @stevieclark556 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thank you yet again Tom. Talk about resonating with me... I've felt a lot of what you say, instinctively for as long as I can remember! "Love" is the programme. God is the Computer.

  • @twcjr44
    @twcjr44  11 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Yes, It is our experience and the intent driving that experience that enables the evolution of consciousness.

  • @wraithofsolidarity
    @wraithofsolidarity 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I flipping love you, Tom Campbell, 7 years of growth, 7 years of not looking at pieces of paper, I had problems with my mind from around 16 with forgetting things and losing my low entropy in conversation I found a way to live. this free will science will change everything.
    I go to Lila quite often now with a host of gods and goddesses we all know from across the world, I've seen some things, I'd love you to do some art one day.

  • @maxhillaert9253
    @maxhillaert9253 11 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    What's the difference between a belief and an understanding? What Tom explains as his understanding, this insight form his being, I think could be considered his belief.

  • @rtanidean4931
    @rtanidean4931 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Oh ps.
    “A disbeliever is just another believer!”
    “The truth can’t be owned!”
    Excellent dissertation!
    The “truth” is perpetual, it unfolds within oneself and our experiences.
    All about discernment to what
    is balanced within YOU!
    Observations, discernment, heart-centered consciousness, intentions and actions. Rather simple actually.

  • @peacekeepermoe
    @peacekeepermoe 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Tom would win any blinking (not rather) challenge. He can go a minute without blinking when he is listening to the interviewer lol. Good interview and info.

  • @twcjr44
    @twcjr44  11 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    The VR is working fine -- we are a pretty thickheaded bunch of pre-schoolers, so progress is slow

  • @courtstone
    @courtstone 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    At the end, I've never heard Tom laugh that hard when she said, it was perfect LOL

  • @SandroLendler
    @SandroLendler 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you, Donna and Tom... it's nice to hear/see you again :-)

  • @salasvalor01
    @salasvalor01 11 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Your explanation from another video about powerful people who are just ordinary people, but simply attached to power, is definitely an important insight, btw.

  • @Josytt
    @Josytt 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Every Christian & Muslim needs to watch this...

  • @straightpath7795
    @straightpath7795 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    As I was searching for truths I looked into many religions. I noticed there is a lot of hatred in some people. But when you look at where people get their information and see what kind of people they follow you have understanding why they act and say hateful things to others with different beliefs. My thoughts are everyone is on different levels of understanding and loving. I believe love is the answer.
    🦋🦋🦋🦋🦋

  • @larsellingsen7302
    @larsellingsen7302 8 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Sometimes I wonder, dose the bacteria in my colon knows that I exist? I must be the universe. I wonder what they talk about
    me and about the limitation of the universe (my colon). We just like those bacteria in the universe. It is beyond our knowledge. We are not the species that somehow can explain the whole idea. We don’t have the mind or the ability to do that. We are just imprisoned in the darkness of another kind of colon somehow. We always try to explain the big picture with the limitation of our existing knowledge. Well in the time of stem engine, everything was like the steam engine. The boy works like a steam engine. The modern idea of the computer is the dominant and the ultimate knowledge that we have now and we try to explain everything by the virtual reality. However, some years from now, we will find a new dominant that will try to explain what we are and what realty is about, yet we will fail again. I believe that our limitation is like the limitation of a glass of water it can only contain a limited volume of water and you can’t add more. We are not the species that can figure it out. That’s it.

  • @jwbaccaro
    @jwbaccaro 11 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Tom, you can "believe" in something and remain open-minded. I believe in a lot of things you talk about, but I don't bind myself to it. I search for Truth, and move forward, always. :)

  • @Ray3645
    @Ray3645 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    So, where did the larger consciousness system come from? Also, is it alive -- or simply a "thing?"

  • @film4thepeople
    @film4thepeople 11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The power of belief has the potential to change the physical environments in which we find ourselves

  • @digang7
    @digang7 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    So much wisdom packed in one conversation! My being has evolved by listening and integrating. I’m full of epiphanies and connections. One of my most favorite Tom Campbell conversations yet.

  • @twcjr44
    @twcjr44  11 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Peer review (especially for new innovative ideas where having lots of supportive peers is impossible) is available primarily for academic physicists and it is as much a political/cultural process as a scientific one. If academic physicists keep moving toward my position as they have since MBT was published, perhaps one day that might be possible. Watch the introduction video at PEAR Labs

  • @hamishjames5953
    @hamishjames5953 10 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Tom was referenced in an interesting article I read about reincarnation, for his unique understanding of reality.
    & because I see religion for the close-minded man made belief system it is, I had to watch this video first (the video title had me a little worried) to see if this is a person I could trust & open myself up to.
    Needless to say, he views religion in exactly the same way I do, obviously in a more eloquent way than I could ever describe, but.all his points instantly resonate with me.
    I've got a feeling this channel is going to be an extraordinary ride.

    • @amritpalchana7807
      @amritpalchana7807 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      what article did you read about reincarnation?
      do you remember?

  • @twcjr44
    @twcjr44  11 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Self-awareness in the service of love is good -- necessary even. Self-awareness in the service of fear is called ego and needs to be eliminated.

  • @sonnymery4193
    @sonnymery4193 9 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I find it funny how Tom spends the last 20 minutes explaining how nothing can be perfect and infinite, then Dona sums up the interview saying: Thank you Tom for your explanation of how the consciousness model works, it was PERFECT! oh i mean, it was excellent"

  • @cathyellicottcarver7953
    @cathyellicottcarver7953 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This is a fabulous video and both brilliant men of science reached the same ultimate conclusion as that made by Jesus 2000 years ago: “Love one another.” ‘Love does make the world go around.”

  • @LohengrinTh
    @LohengrinTh 10 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    I agree with every approach Tom has in every single matter.. his approach is always so incredibly sincere and truthful.. he is enlighted He exhibits a complete freedom from all the placebo boundaries this World tries so hard to bind each individual into.. He is the personification of mental Freedom

    • @fractaljourneys1153
      @fractaljourneys1153 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yeah he has the mental freedom to claim he's a physicist and worked as a large systems analyst for NASA, but that's rubbish I dare anyone to provide a independent verifiable link proving his claims about his education, I've spent a lot of time trying to find any proof of his degree_ nothing nota zilch
      It's all a facade
      There are plenty of actual physicists with great Ideas regarding the nature of reality
      Max Tegmark, Fritjof Capra, Erwin Schrodinger(what is life). etc.
      Tom Campbells ideas are tainted by his outright and well orchestrated lies.

    • @1greenMitsi
      @1greenMitsi 10 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      ***** look harder noob, it took me 10 minutes...learn to interweb
      archive.org/stream/bethanian1966beth#page/176/mode/2up
      using credentials to undermine theories - you are an idiot, you just dont know it yet

    • @lettersquash
      @lettersquash 10 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      1greenMitsi
      Yeah, it looks very likely that he graduated with a masters degree in physics, and started doing a PhD, then dropped out, so didn't get a doctorate. I can't disprove any of the following from the Institute for Neuroscience and Consciousness Studies inacs.org/2013/04/30/lucid-dreaming-and-out-of-body-experience/
      "Thomas Warren Campbell, Jr., graduated in 1966 with honors and majors in both mathematics and physics from Bethany College in West Virgina, received a master’s degree in physics from Purdue University in 1968. and commenced work toward a PhD at the University of Virginia. He left before completing his doctorate to begin a career as a professional physicist, working primarily in the context of US missile defense systems with the Space and Missile Defense Command, the Missile Defense Agency, and NASA."
      However, I have searched extensively for mention of Tom as an alumnus of Purdue University, and despite finding various sites listing famous ones, he's not there. I found a link to the alumnus database of the Uni, but access is restricted. I have emailed to enquire whether it is possible to confirm awards of previous graduates, and will add a reply when I find out more.
      I do find the description "NASA physicist", and to some degree "nuclear physicist" on the flattering side for someone with a relatively basic degree and no PhD. I also trust sources who report that his involvement with those establishments above was merely advisory "solving problems of risk and vulnerability" on the Aries 1 Program. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Mindhush So he wasn't a "NASA scientist" in the sense of permanent staff, nor was he apparently advising them on nuclear physics.
      While he clearly ought to know more about nuclear physics than your average Joe, this position of ex- "professional physicist" does not convey anything like the esteem or trustworthiness one can expect of research physicists or those with lecturing positions, and here is the crucial point: science, including in the area of consciousness, progresses through publication and peer review of research or theoretical papers in the relevant academic journals, and I don't know of anything of that kind from Tom. The excuse about MBT being too multi-disciplinary for that, hence he published in a trade journal, is obvious spin. He can't claim academic credentials and refuse to talk to other academics as an equal. Besides which, I'm a lay person and I can identify word salad when I hear it.
      It seems pretty plain to me that Tom, like several other "professional" scientists, having failed to finish his doctorate, and having failed to bring in enough money advising governmental departments on how rockets work, found a more lucrative field in Pontificating About Metaphisics, where it doesn't matter a damn what you say as long as people believe it and keep buying the books. Bruce Lipton is another one from the field of biology, but at least he seems to have actually got a doctorate and done some proper work before going over to the Secret side, lecturing to packed houses on things he doesn't understand and selling pseudoscience books like hot cakes. This New Age Scam is worth billions, and they all bolster each other up to sell their happy crappy nonsense, swarming round Hay House like flies. There's another one of Tom on yt supporting Rupert Sheldrake's idiotic rant about the Science Delusion. Sheldrake, who has never found one iota of evidence for his morphic resonance BS, now goes round lecturing (and has written another book) making out it's all science's fault for not being open minded enough to believe dogs know when their owners are coming home or people know when they're being stared at, on the basis of his "research" that wouldn't get him a university degree, it's so poorly designed...and who now hopes to make progress by getting the public to send in their anecdotes of spooky experiences! They're all a bunch of liars and cheats.

  • @twcjr44
    @twcjr44  11 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    No, I am talking about a meditative state without ego or belief. For most of us the two are the same even if we do not realize it. With effort, they can become quite separate things. Achieving that separation is what I am talking about.

  • @MindVersusMisery
    @MindVersusMisery 9 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Hello Tom!
    I've been watching a lot of your own videos the last year, and the different topics about everyday life you did with Evita Ochel. And I have two questions that has come up recently:
    1) With Evita you talked about nutrition and the morals concerning our food choices. The part that really resonated with me was the part about not causing harm towards sentient beings for food when it is not necessary. And in this clip above (at about 3:40) you are talking about when it is time to stand up and fight for justice. I understand that actions are most efficient when they come from love rather than from fear or frustration. The issue of animal rights is so difficult though since exploitation of animals is so deeply rooted in our culture. What is the MBT view on activism, such as animal rights activism? And how can one be the most efficient in helping the animal liberation?
    2) Since we create our own reality, and reality is subjective and therefore "real" to us. What is then the purpose or what role does schizophrenia, dementia and serious hallucinations play in our subjective reality and our "growing up"?
    Thank you Tom for helping me understand life!
    Much love from Sweden!

  • @godsgracenaka247
    @godsgracenaka247 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Grateful to you both, just found you now

  • @metaRising
    @metaRising 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm still confused about the necessity for reincarnation. If I'm the larger consciousness system having a particular experience, what is the necessity for anything I associate with me in particular to be moved into another life? Wouldn't this remove something of the reason to be having experiences as different beings? I understand that life and consciousness enrich the informational content of the universe, so why have reincarnation?

  • @twcjr44
    @twcjr44  11 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Yes something like that. But perhaps "born into" fits a little better than "dropped in". It's like this: Sink or swim -- learn by experience -- do the best you can, we are here to help and coach you, and if you have a problem or mess up, that's okay because you will always get another opportunity to try again, and in time you will get better and better at it.

  • @Etaks89
    @Etaks89 11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    When I finally was able to settle the thoughts in my head to where I wasn't prone to the habitual thought patterns I had the sense that time itself reversed, or stopped all together. That at my deepest level, was just being, here and now only. But on the surface level was constant change, identifying with the surface made me feel like time was running out. The difference to me, is like thinking your in the world, but realizing the world is with in you as consciousness. Your thoughts, tom?

  • @twcjr44
    @twcjr44  11 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The IUOC is the result of all the various FWAUs it has played. It is the accumulator of evolutionary progress. It starts out neutral with great potential, jumps into a VR to get experience, then tries to improve the quality of its choices as it cycles through experience packets growing toward becoming love. The FWAU is the experiencer in the VR. It is a chunk of the IUOC making real-time choices in a particular VR that more or less express the quality the IUOC has accumulated thus far.

  • @twcjr44
    @twcjr44  11 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Belief is always a problem -- it blinds one to the truth. If these people were open minded and skeptical, their errors would have quickly become obvious. Getting rid of fear and the ego and belief it generates is always the fundamental solution to problems of immorality. Motivation or intent based on fear, ego, belief, and expectation generally leads to dysfunctional behavior. Belief in your goodness is not relevant to moral value. One's intent, at the being level, expresses one's quality.

  • @kroeran
    @kroeran 11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    If you have a connection and appreciation for Tom's unique effort and contribution, by logic, you perhaps should trust his decision to give Ted authority over the forum. Learning to submit to authority, even an authority not gently applied, is part of the process of qualifying to be an authority holder yourself, and through this group engagement magnifying the penetrative power of your wisdom. Ted is an important test for you to pass.

  • @rtanidean4931
    @rtanidean4931 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you!! Believing in believing has gotten us all into many quagmires. It’s a quest and okay to not know. The indoctrinations, especially with religious dogmas have created much division within the humanity awareness.
    Yes, we are best when we are in service to others and ourselves. Jaded actions and intentions upon others who may mot resonate with “belief systems” is exactly the opposite of kindness, compassion, empathy, altruism, discernment and wisdom. Most may find their own truth to be quite easy to unveil…
    It is within. Within. Within. 💚

  • @twcjr44
    @twcjr44  11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Yes. The IUOC can see the larger pattern of what works and what doesn't over many experience packets and learn from that cumulative feedback. The FWAU gains from the IUOC's learning but is forced to apply that learning by being/choosing within the VR, rather than through intellectual assessment.

  • @pamfiloabionjr4529
    @pamfiloabionjr4529 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I love this guy…thank you for this helpful message ❤❤❤❤❤❤

  • @twcjr44
    @twcjr44  11 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Yes, sort of... There are no required courses. There is required learning. Any way you can learn what you have to learn is fine. Because taking courses that are either too hard or too easy is a waste of time, there is a very large selection of courses available to suite everyone's particular talents, capabilities, and needs.

  • @twcjr44
    @twcjr44  11 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    No way to know for sure where we (or the LCS for that matter) are (what level we are a part of) within the larger fractal pattern, but my best guess would be that, in any case, it is the product of "a "a team of seasoned VR engineers".

  • @Stonezster
    @Stonezster 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Isn't seeing reality as a simulation or VR a belief? In my experience, belief and faith aren't the same thing. Belief is structured like believing we live in a simulation but faith is the expression of that belief or the outcome of that belief or the action of that belief. For example, If I believe this world is VR then I'll live through faith assuming that is true...

    • @omegawolf77
      @omegawolf77 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Also Tom discounts the presence of good and evil in the TOE. These concepts are inherent to our VR, humanity, and rule set and probably beyond. If the goal of our consciousness is love then there needs to be a counter point. If there is only love, there is no love. Also why is "evolving" our consciousness important? What is "growth" and how is this objectively defined? This is not clear by the TOE. It basically says that consciousness is evolving to "improve" itself based on arbitrary criteria. This is decidedly a belief. It is an extension of Darwinism that includes a theory of how consciousness evolved and a belief about its purpose.

  • @kroeran
    @kroeran 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    I believe here you are expressing the foundation of the Campbell Protocol, which is an empirical attitude and fact based approach to so called spirituality. Belief is the enemy. Doubt must be removed by experience and data, not a self referential belief loop. Time and experience tests all hypotheses. Interactive cooperation is power. Great openness and great skepticism applied against any hypothesis, accepting hypothesis as highly likely to be true, reluctantly, accepting that much is unknown.

  • @twcjr44
    @twcjr44  11 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    It can be either way and anything in between. It depends on the individual and the social context he/she finds himself/herself in. The point is that the social context is not that important as long as it will support the existence of a being of love. Some social contexts may be more or less challenging or supportive of an individual becoming love. Thus individuals at various levels of consciousness quality can find environments that offer the appropriate challenge to optimize their next step

  • @twcjr44
    @twcjr44  11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    There was informal primal time from the beginning it comes with the assumption that AUO could differentiate between a this way and that way state (requiring change, which requires time, but not a regular uniform time). Regular time, a constant delta-t, was invented much later to facilitate sequencing (another entropy reducer) and eventually was used to drive dynamic simulations (virtual realities)

  • @twcjr44
    @twcjr44  11 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    It helped me understand the nature of reality and how I could interact with it. I have an occasional use for that ability, but for the most part I don't bother. I can't think of any reason why that ability would be important to raising the quality of one's consciousness.

    • @truskoolmusik8171
      @truskoolmusik8171 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Tom Campbell .

    • @miao6487
      @miao6487 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      sorry for my english first... and thanks for your job...maybe i arrived a little bit late so...let me double ask after watching a couple of interviews from 1 year ago also....God a" living entity".... still thinking the same thing?? are "spirits" living entities? Gods and spirits are "clouds" of information or data ? are those "clouds" dead or alive? is the water or the electricity that starts -promote this life? both? .... asking this because i am totally sure , under experience, that the executive branch of the LCS is nothing to do with that God or Gods...maybe they say that... but... not way , they are clouds searching lakes... or rivers..something like that ;) nothing else... at least there should be nothing else... and why is it called "Consciousness" ( which is evident just a tool used for interacting with the information using the data and of course existing and evolving ;) ) to something else that you know "pretty" well after years of experience? that word in english creates a big confusion... "con-ciencia"... that is all...translate spanish ( with science) ;) is a referencial models of experiences for acting on the "game"...The -Net/Web- .....(the hyfa)...electromagnetic / quantum fields-rivers-flowing info plus dark matter if we want to be more trendy hihihi...joking a bit...that is a different thing from Consciousness....the Net is closer that what you means by "LCS" by definition and also have different connections beyond Consciousness and this "gym-structure-planet" (not talking about the brain here, another "limiting" factor) and of course the executive manager is not God..is not a cloud.... this is why here 1 is the precedent of zero.... and there are clouds of info around waiting for the spark coming from the Net to be induced into live... old clouds..new clouds... info waiting for "consciousness carriers" to exchange experiences and arrive in neutral zone "zero" ... not always is like that but often...still chaotic info around ;) ..... we are not zero yet.... did you think about the Consciousness of the stones? they have a lot of information and data inside but zero conscience because they have never ever moved...have not acted or experienced... "act" with science... easy like that...other things...are other things... of course once the information inside the stone becomes activated and extracted placing into a carrier then yes, we can talk about some form of consciousness but this is a different topic..and is not mythology either ;) I really see that Consciousness has much more to do directly with data than information , at least we are adding some ethos-moral to this word..i hope nope.... and information has much more to do directly with what is called "unconsciousness" ( here i would talk about different definitions and electromagnetic fields but is not the place now) .. is not consciousness without movement (related to electricity) ...I really see how the full ( unconsciousness ) management of the information creates the needs of a system of Consciousness... to get the things done, and not the opposite.. i dont see Consciousness as nothing else that the result of the manage whole data from previous experiences into the information system... Maybe it is time to really go deep in what is information and forget a little bit about that simple concept of consciousness.... be Well!

  • @PixieChix14
    @PixieChix14 10 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Be open minded. Remember having faith and beliefs isn't wrong. Just be open to knew things. That's his point. He's not enforcing anything on anyone nor is he speaking in circles. He makes sense when he speaks and he's well educated. People seem to just be afraid of reality. Meditate and get into spirituality and I promise you'll understand. It's okay to have faith and believe in whatever you want. Just stay open minded.

    • @VossaBygde
      @VossaBygde 10 ปีที่แล้ว

      I agree totally! We gotta stay open minded.

    • @1960taylor
      @1960taylor 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Sabrina Dos Santos faith is nonsense. There is either knowing or not knowing. When you admit you don't know you begin to seek your OWN answers. When Tom dies he will be forgotten in 3 days...Christ remains the most significant person to have ever lived. I guess he was a good avitar...lmao.

    • @trekpac2
      @trekpac2 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +ᄎMVTCHXS.ᄎ Well said. Thanks.

  • @twcjr44
    @twcjr44  11 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The IUOC, once it begins experiencing in a VR of some sort where it must make choices and maintain itself, begins to develop fear, ego, and expectations (among other things) at its core.

  • @fixeddice1982
    @fixeddice1982 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    He states around 34:00 that we can't know anything about what is outside of our local (universe) perception and knowledge. Which is true UNLESS the knowledge we obtained came from outside of our perceptible state.

  • @black_squall
    @black_squall 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    thanks for this talk Tom. I'm only through the first 7-8 minutes and you are talking about a subject I've wrestled with a lot. I too have came to the same conclusion that you have, and it feels really good to hear you say it.

  • @TheMistaSilly
    @TheMistaSilly 11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Zen Philosopher Allan Watts and Spiritual Teacher Krishnamurti: "there is nothing... absolutely nothing that you can do to improve, transform, or better yourself. If you understand this completely you will realize that there is no such entity as 'you'” Watts: "I could not do any systematic or formal meditation because methodical spiritual disciplines are merely highbrow ways of exalting the ego. Aiming at unselfishness is the most insidious form of selfishness." Hmm..how can i understand this?

  • @MichaelSmith420fu
    @MichaelSmith420fu 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    One ultimately has to have the true constitution to follow their heart.
    1 John 2:26-27 ESV / 16 helpful votes
    I write these things to you about those who are trying to deceive you. But the anointing that you received from him abides in you, and you have no need that anyone should teach you. But as his anointing teaches you about everything, and is true, and is no lie-just as it has taught you, abide in him.
    1 John 4:1 ESV / 12 helpful votes
    Beloved, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God, for many false prophets have gone out into the world.

    • @rtanidean4931
      @rtanidean4931 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Great share. The Christ within. He grand illusion of this realm may be a tricky place. Indoctrination / misdirection and manipulations from puppet masters make observations, discernment and heart-centered awareness a quagmire and may jade viewpoints if not truly under stood with careful perspective. Inner standing of peeling one’s onion and self-corrections are key elements as pieces / fractals of BEingness are realized / real eyes.

    • @MichaelSmith420fu
      @MichaelSmith420fu 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@rtanidean4931 th-cam.com/video/OWJBMfR6TLM/w-d-xo.html

  • @markovull
    @markovull 11 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Re, belief: Dear Dr. Campbell, you say belief is not positive, but what if that belief is that we are individual units of consciousness in a greater consciousness system and we evolve individually over many incarnations in this and other virtual reality sub-systems by lowering our entropy through love (manifested through empathy and collaboration) and that the opposite of love is fear (manifested through selfishness and competition), which increases our entropy and causes us to de-evolve? Is that belief okay?

    • @adrianciu
      @adrianciu 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      If you can prove that what Tom says is a belief (meaning blind faith and not healthy verifiable result of personal research and experience that others can duplicate) then you're right in debating what he says.
      The interesting stuff is going the way he says he went and getting the enlightenment, as appears to be the case and he encourages everybody to do it.
      I meditate and try to get closer to evolve as he prompts one to do so I wish to absorb (and hopefully be able to create as well) knowledge from all sources starting with him, knowledge about how to efficiently evolve and open my mind and soul.
      In conclusion if what he says is verifiable, even only individually, then the WORLD is open to you! If not, then find ways to intelligently 'debunk' him!

    • @twcjr44
      @twcjr44  10 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      To M Pullen: No, that belief is not OK... you may believe it is true or you may believe it is not true, either way, you are left with nothing significant. You missed the point entirely. Belief is the problem. Open-minded skepticism is the solution to that problem.

    • @lettersquash
      @lettersquash 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Tom Campbell
      Ha ha. Open-minded skepticism. You people. I wonder if you should have corrected M Pullen's belief that you're a "Dr". At least that would have meant something.
      Adrian Ciubotariu
      *healthy verifiable result of personal research and experience that others can duplicate* - this is not a good method for working out what is and isn't true. One religious sect can do their meditation and "find" particular "truths", which they report to others in the sect - the novices - who repeat the process and find the same. Another sect can be "finding" a bunch of completely contradictory "truth" in their meditation. A vast number of cultures have existed that "find" contradictory "truths". The problems are imagination and cognitive bias. Empirical scientific enquiry aims to remove imagination (hallucinations) and bias (wishful thinking, etc.) by measuring actual phenomena. Proper scientists do that in peer-reviewed journals. Tom just sells books to the public telling them lies they want to believe, then confuses them and keeps them coming back for more by telling them not to believe anything. It's a classic fakir trick from ancient India. You're being fed New-Age sewage.

    • @BetterDoYourHomeWork
      @BetterDoYourHomeWork 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +Tom Campbell I love your videos. But I still question the issue of faith. I have seen religion really work in people's lives. If a person renders Jesus into their "reality", and it changes their life - Is it "real"? I often feel like everything is a giant paradox.

    • @nmbokn8593
      @nmbokn8593 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I think you have to break that down a little further: "render Jesus into their reality" what does that mean? Do you mean they pretend Jesus is helping them? To me faith means "let's pretend". Was it Jesus that changed their life or something within that person that kicked in and changed that person, when they thought/pretended Jesus was doing it?

  • @twcjr44
    @twcjr44  11 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    By logical process. It is all in the books. The books are free at Google books. The TH-cam video :"Calgary Workshop" on my YT channel gives a good summary.

  • @kroeran
    @kroeran 11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I think God is the word we use for "there is more to this than meets the eye". Tom reframes God as one membrane of consciousness with a manifold or wave shape, and each soul is a bump or wave on God's membrane or sheet, and each person is a material avatar incarnated to this virtual reality to have experiences and learn, initially to experience individuation or separateness, later to experience oneness or sheetness, becoming love.

  • @AravahStar
    @AravahStar 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Liked! Great topic, great questions. She's my favorite interviewer. Her voice is...'perfect' lol I found you while in the process of conversion to Judaism after hearing an orthodox rabbi giving a talk about the double slit experiment. I had a total turn around, but I still appreciate the perspectives learned while deeply plunged into religion from birth. I see now that religion isn't necessary & even negative/separating in many, maybe most aspects. Growing in love rather than belief is ideal.

  • @twcjr44
    @twcjr44  11 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I do explain all that very clearly in the books (which are free on Google Books) and in some of the videos. This YT format requires my answer to be less than 500 characters and spaces. What you need explained (almost everything in MBT) is very much larger than that.

  • @twcjr44
    @twcjr44  11 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    That is easy -- I have over 200 videos on TH-cam (twcjr44) and the books are free on Google Books. The "Calgary Workshop" video is a good overview.
    In short:
    individual soul = individuated unit of consciousness
    Reincarnation is a logical necessity

  • @trekpac2
    @trekpac2 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks Tom for a thoughtful approach. I listened with open-minded scepticism. Some dogma about what you think all religion is, but you also do a good job of offering wise perspectives. I find some Christians, many Buddhists and so on to be open-minded sceptics, viewing much with probability as you do. But we all have different levels of understanding. Many find much value in their faith and I have to trust it is good for them. Perhaps there also is truth in 'if you can't be happy, at least you can be a philosopher'.

  • @didilv2187
    @didilv2187 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    I am so disappointed that this event was not listed at MTB events, i live in Atlanta, i am so sad i have missed the chance to catch this. is there another way to follow your upcoming schedule mr campbell?

  • @abbiebeast
    @abbiebeast 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Wow from 41:50+ he tries so hard not to say God, but means the same.... yes he is not an old dude sitting in a white clousd sruming a harp doubting Thomis WE ALL KNOW THAT

  • @twcjr44
    @twcjr44  11 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Not in the classical way. But if you want "heaven' to be a metaphor for living or being in a state of grace, then we are manifesting or moving toward this metaphorical heaven as we become love no matter what sort of VR or environment we are engaged in.

    • @brendaslittledogs1724
      @brendaslittledogs1724 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Tom Campbell as we become more reflective of Divine live through God the only Love. We are not Love but we reflect Love.

  • @rabidashlewis7101
    @rabidashlewis7101 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Lol thanks! I appreciated your use of it as it kept things running smoothly so I tried to do to the same. Thanks truwins! I wish you the same happiness in life, as well as the great day!

  • @twcjr44
    @twcjr44  11 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    No, it primarily evolves around the quality of personal choice.

  • @Kevo216666
    @Kevo216666 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi Tom, Hope you're good. A quick question: Have you submitted your TOE to any scientific journals for peer review? If so would you mind directing me to it? Many thanks.

  • @MichaelSmith420fu
    @MichaelSmith420fu 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The biggest reason I believe in something greater than myself is because I didn't produce myself or this beautiful mind or body or my family's or this environment with fruits and such possibility for us all. I also know my faults and I'm glad the system works such that Im not In charge. I don't remember what came before, I fight the good fight, and I trust that the good will find it's way when I die.
    Faith is a HUGE part of life. I'll even go as far as saying faith in Jesus (who was the greatest dude ever) is extra powerful.
    I've had my struggles with believing this and admit to my ups and downs. That's how you grow.
    Gotta just read the Bible at a personal level and get rid of the stereotypes cuz there's a bunch of stuff there that is good.
    I actually did experience something from the holy Spirit that totally turned this reality upside down.

    • @rtanidean4931
      @rtanidean4931 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Btw Michael, I experienced the same as you typed in your comment. Stay strong Michael. Much to learn and continue to grow and help others best we can along the way as we correct within.

    • @MichaelSmith420fu
      @MichaelSmith420fu 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@rtanidean4931 thanks for all the kind words.. I wish I had something nice to say back 🙂

    • @MichaelSmith420fu
      @MichaelSmith420fu 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@rtanidean4931 it's super sobering to hear these things and I appreciate it

  • @twcjr44
    @twcjr44  11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    When a beginning IUOC "enters" a VR, it exists in that VR as an individual, and thus is separate from "all other than self". The IUOC must maintain and evolve itself, within the VR. In the VR, the IUOC must deal with "other" by making choices. Initially the choices tend to be rather self centered and self focused (at that point, with no previous experience in VRs, the self is all the IUOC knows, trusts, or understands). Needless to say, the IUOC gets feedback appropriate to the choices made.

  • @twcjr44
    @twcjr44  11 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Taken literally it would mean that change is impossible, thus evolution and growth is impossible. We know this is false. I think the point they are making is that consciousness evolution results from change at the being level, not from change at the intellectual level. Also, that it is not a matter of what you do, but rather what you are (what you be). That doing does not automatically lead to a change in the quality of being. One cannot evolve or grow by merely doing, one must be differently

  • @abhimanyukarnawat7441
    @abhimanyukarnawat7441 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    isnt mbt compatible to vedanta and jainism,and even buddism?i see a lot of parallels in these

  • @pedimatt60
    @pedimatt60 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Tom, how did AUO and AUM initiate and evolve when in the beginning there where no Delta Ts.
    How could there be movement prior to time?

  • @twcjr44
    @twcjr44  11 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The PMR avatar "pilot" is an IUOC that, like all IUOCs, operates on an intellectual level and a being level. The being level represents the truth at the core of the IUOC while the intellectual level represents what the IUOC has convinced itself is true. If the IUOC has fear, ego, belief, and expectations, then the apparent "truth" found at being level and the intellectual level may be very different. If no fear, etc., then the two are the same. A fearful IUOC may be unaware of its being level.

  • @kroeran
    @kroeran 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    To help me understand the word for fear, in the special way you use it, could one use the word "separation/separative", the emotions that arise due to thinking/perceiving of oneself as being entirely separated from others, but as well, separated from the being level?

  • @roymerritt6992
    @roymerritt6992 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Tom to further elaborate on my last question. I'm 64 and grew up on a farm in NC. I had seven siblings and my father was a drunk, we had no plumbing and our life was abject poverty and hard work. I grew up and my adult life has been no great shakes although I've never been a wretched person or a criminal and even though married to a wonderful woman we have struggled and suffered mightily because of the failings of some family members who are irresponsible. What have I learned?

  • @creativity5002
    @creativity5002 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    A great mind and a very intriguing talk
    Thank you Dr.campbell

  • @DennisBTV
    @DennisBTV 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Where does he get all his information and theories from?

  • @kroeran
    @kroeran 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is ideal intent selflessness, or a certain optimal balance between self and other?

  • @twcjr44
    @twcjr44  11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Jeeze! I have answered that question in detail at least a hundred times, don't be afraid to look around. :-)
    Short answers: becoming absolute love is like approaching absolute zero or the speed of light -- the approach is asymptotically -- The system is still evolving (open ended), there is no final destination in evolution. There is always something else to do, like helping others.

  • @buva704
    @buva704 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Tom what do you think of Eckhart Tolle and his way of dealing with ego and being consciousness ?

  • @capnlilpants
    @capnlilpants 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Tom-- What about the yuga/great age system? Does consciousness evolve/devolve as we revolve around some cosmic center?

  • @larrymondello8475
    @larrymondello8475 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank You

  • @john-we4pl
    @john-we4pl 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    hi tom, im currently about 2 thirds of the way through my big toe trilogy..
    regarding the big cheese, did he once live as we do in PMR or NPMR and evolved his conciousness to the level he is now ? a part from the book i remember [ cant remember word for word ] " the bacteria in the lab in the petri dish can evolve to the point where it can leave the petri dish and become a worker in the lab " ?

  • @probablechoices
    @probablechoices 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for another post Tom

  • @kroeran
    @kroeran 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    The key thing here is your general attitude to your local economy, and if you have become defeatist. If your belief regarding billionaires does not interfere with your own motivation and relationship to your craft, then its just conversation. Paraphrasing Tom...."Billionaires, like the rest of us, are trying to get as much as they can for as little effort as possible, and we are pissed that they are so much better at it than we are!".

  • @twcjr44
    @twcjr44  11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Perhaps, the evolution of consciousness quality can take that path, but that path is not required, nor is it optimal. However in our PMR, because of the ubiquity of fear and ego, this is a very common path.

  • @jananicole2319
    @jananicole2319 10 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thanks, Tom. I think what you share is immeasurably valuable.

  • @AlfarAwayMusic
    @AlfarAwayMusic 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for this!.
    may i ask the Non Player Characters here is this virtual reality matrix?

  • @DorothyGTyas
    @DorothyGTyas 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Fabulous presentation. 🍃❣🍃

  • @hermenutic
    @hermenutic 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    my mind has expanded and my suspicions confirmed regarding heaven, faith and Christ as a result of this explanation given by Mr. Campbell.
    I can see how the Christian idea of living and moving and having being in God as an explanation of the operation relationships of the kingdom of heaven which is in you.
    If the kingdom of heaven is in you as Jesus insisted then this makes a lot of sense in Christian terms.
    God and heaven are symbols we use to express what we feel is really true.

    • @jankjason
      @jankjason 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      People who have had NDE's explained heaven as "home" and god as "the source".

  • @douglaswayne8916
    @douglaswayne8916 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    But doesn't belief create that which you believe in, as the Double Slit experiment seemed to show?

    • @mondopinion3777
      @mondopinion3777 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      You might like to read Is Atheism Dead? by Eric Metaxas. He goes into stuff like that.

  • @tumypka79
    @tumypka79 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Tom - what's the purpose of us evolving into LOVE? Why is it the ultimate goal? And once we do - then what? I have hard time visualizing someone becoming/evolving into LOVE - what will that person "look like" when he is there?

    • @markovull
      @markovull 11 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      it's about lowering entropy, i.e. moving towards greater coherence and organization, as opposed to disorder and chaos. Love moves us towards lower entropy because it promotes collaboration, cooperation and empathy. Fear moves us towards higher entropy because it promotes competition, selfishness and greed. Imagine the individual cells in your liver or your heart. If they were principally concerned about their narrow self interest they would not be able to cooperate with the other cells and collectively function as an organ. Instead they would form a tumor. In the same way we are individual cells on the planet and if we are not acting in love towards all life and working to support the existence of all then we are acting like a tumorous cell.

  • @Lovechaosmovie
    @Lovechaosmovie 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is meditation a way or the best way to achieve that separation?