Elon and Space X are so Far ahead in the civilian space race it will be hard to catch up! He has already proven how reliable his rockets are! Gonna be hard to catch up
Taking into consideration how rapidly SpaceX has progressed, I think they will launch flight 7 before the end of this year using Booster 14. The amount of flight data that can be achieved is very critical at this point of development.
SpaceX should fly Starship 32 with a reused booster 12 . Then send 32 to rendezvous with the Tesla Roadster for orbit to Mars or Venus or whatever. That would be cool.
Nothing but "catches" from here on out. It's a waste of precious time to be splashing down in the Ocean unnecessarily. Also it's high time to get at the minimum, some cargo missions touching down on the surface of Luna soon. Getting several hundreds and hundreds of tons of a wide variety of cargo safely to the selected location that Luna Base will occupy, will give us invaluable practice for when this shit starts to get REAL. The location for Luna Base needs to be hammered out ASAP. It should have abundant water ice and provide as much natural protection from cosmic rays as possible. Many materials provide at least some protection from cosmic rays. Integrating these materials into the bases modules is, of course, required. Material such as polyethylene, a good protector from cosmic rays, needs to be utilized extensively. Its light weight is a huge bonus. Anyhow, landing all this cargo gets us way ahead of the game and is a win-win proposition. Getting the process down pat now saves a lot of anxiety later. Let's hit that afterburner and get this shit moving guys!
The inventory of obsolete engines is valuable for high-risk tests or they will go to waste. They are expendable. Tests to failure are not popular but valuable to identify design limits.
So if they catch the booster how are they going to be able to catch the starship. Will they have enough time to remove the booster before they need to catch the starship?
The tower is tall enough to catch the Starship while the booster is sitting on it. That's the only way it makes sense for rapid reusability. You catch the booster, then you catch the Starship and set it on the booster and it's ready to go for next flight
Just read in a online article : Roscosmos CEO Yuri Borisov announced that the Amur rocket could be used "significantly more frequently" than SpaceX's Falcon 9 launch vehicle😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅 The russians are Always very funny
I'm more interested in the Raptor 3's than anything else. Twiddling with the flappers or hull length is petty in comparison to what a difference the 3's will make in reliability, power, and savings in time and money in manufacture. They need a Shake Down Cruise, and any bugs dealt with. Hopefully the Enginerds dont overload them with sensors, and are satisfied with test fires etc. Especially after the repeat fire 34 times in ten minutes... They are just gonna work guys, get used to it. When something is well done, you can start forgetting about it... Theres even a line in the Tao about the syndrome. Besides, I wanna see all the doubter's reactions, Should be an obvious difference in thrust, Zipping off the pad, and out of sight... Already pretty crazy how fast the R-2's accelerate that mass... What will be best about R-3 introduction, is the effects on competitors. Five stages of engineering grief likely, from grumbling, to getting to work on their own simpified, intergrally self cooled engines. Then things will really take off... (😊) I've been following Elon's Long March thru politics, with certain glee! Now Trumpster's Shadow, and everything getting run past Elon's thought processes, like having a Mentat in Dune... I realized long ago that high functioning Aspies were the Mentats... Could get traditional for real leaders, to have an Elon or Thomas Sowell around to augment the thinking. All humorous to me, having suggested these kinds of things on Space Forums, and been an early suggester of politicalization to get results with the Bureaucracy Blob Monster. Now the Bureaucracy has an Elon Monster chasing it... 😂 One who could apply parts count logic to required forms and steps... Like whats the absolute minimum amount of red tape for any public interaction with an agency... And data already known to the government shouldnt have to be repeated on every application. Just identify the person, pass needed data, and have the results be automatic. Sure will be nice, that after the new year, launch delays from bureaucracy will hit zero! Then it will be just how fast can they build them and do the pre tests to fly... Also was thinking with President Javier Milie being buddies with Elon and the Donald, that maybe Argentina would be a good site for a ballistic sub orbital space port? it is the ends of the Earth in that direction, with Starship Tech being best applied to far points first.. Maybe the Roo-Rats down under could host a port too? Also in the US a great place to start would be on mothballed air bases, like McCord outside Seattle, or one of the spare Fields at Eglin, or the base near Rantool in Illinois, they have airstrips to bring in troops and cargo, usually enough area for public safety, and could be repurposed into Space ports easily, and help reboot local economies. Y'all do know the new economy is gonna be Space right? And that we need to start inclining pretty much everything around that model. That the future major Ports will be Space ports. And the most production will be Space related... So, maybe a good thing to think about in the budgets? Starting Reconstruction at a few choice bases, adding Rocket infrastructure and refurbishing the Air Ports... Sure the locals would appreciate the jobs, and seeing the bases brought back to life. The best is yet to come folks, time to kick it into overdrive. Without the Bureaucracy we will have money for everything. Look at it this way; Almost 3 million bureaucrats in the US, and about 40K homeless Vets... Whats wrong with this picture? I suggest Elon & Trump take care of the Vets better than the parachutes of the bureaucrats. Just sayin'
I think next year Space-X will do more than 10 Starship flights. Greater than double this year. I think by H2 next year the emphasis will shift to driving down time between flights.
@ comments. First is that it is becoming increasingly clear that artificial gravity is the solution to many of the problems and hopefully we will see real testing of it soon. Secondly, the Ariane 6 is already completely obsolete as the days of throw away rocket is coming to an end. Even the Europeans now recognize that and are focusing on 2 new designs using reusable rockets
I would be more optimistic if Ariane 6 could do six flights in 2 months rather than 12 months. It is a make do project that will be costly and unreliable for Europe in the future.
I am wondering what will happen to NASA under the new Trump Administration. Since it will be dedicated to removing government misspending, an obvious target is NASA's rocket building program. Especially with Musk involved in the savings effort, along with streamlining the permit process for SpaceX, transferring rocket building to private companies would be an obvious help in cost savings.
NASA does not build rockets, the ULA builds the SLS and Vulcan. NASA issues the contracts to contractors to build the rockets, the only reason why the ULA still exists is cause Boeing, Lockheed Martin and Northrop give big money to political campaigns. Even now there are news reports that NASA is already reviewing if the SLS is even viable at 2 billion per launch. NASA will most likely hold off on the SLS and wait until Star ship is matured and proven, Even Blue Origins New Glenn.
Flight 7 starship will be in December 15 2024 this year 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉ready for flight and catch for this year flight 8 is to go around the world and back home to land on the chop sticks
Starship Integrated Fight Test 7 (IFT-7, or F7) will be a version 2 Starship. (V2, aka a Block 2 Starship.) V2 is an enlarged Starship with increased capacity main propellant tanks.
Why don't Space X have a second variant of the falcon 9? A falcon nine with the non-reusable engine replaced with the new Raptor 3. They use the old falcon 9 for NASA missions. And get a bit of maturity into their Raptor 3 engines, by using it for Starlink launches. That would also give people a look at a fully reusable falcon 9. And showcase the benefits of rapid reusability. Maturity into the Raptor 3 should be invaluable for their 2026 NASSA moon mission. NASSA being an indispensable customer.
Why would they do that? Totally different architechtures. Making falcon heavy took 5 years. And it just "strap" 2 more boosters on your booster. Do you think it would be benefical to build a whole new rocket (methane vs kerosin) for 5 billion dollars, just to get some runtime on raptor 3? Why not just spend 5 billion on starship to fly 40 times plus?
Go spaceship and booster flight 7 🎉🎉🎉🎉for Dec 15-18 to go around the world and back and land on the hopsticks both of them 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤ yes go for launch flight 7
I read that blood circulates through the jugular in the wrong direction when in absence of gravity. That doesn't look very healthy to me. I'm not going to space for now 😂
Your cardiovascular system is pressurized through your four chambered heart. Blood would never flow backwards in an artery unless something went REALLY REALLY wrong.
NASA NEEDS to be more transparent. If you're an astronaut working for NASA you should not have any medical privacy rights, especially if they're related to space travel.
@@davesilkstone6912 NASA is a gov agency, astronauts are gov employee's. Therefore they give up those rights. If NASA was a private company, I would then agree with you. And how do you know it doesn't effect me or anyone else! You must be REALLY smart!
@@davidyoung518 Though you are technically correct, this is a bad mindset rooted in the ideals and mentality of control, not liberty. You never "give up" your rights, they can only be taken from you. Just because you handed them over, does not mean they weren't wrongfully taken. If someone puts a gun in your face and demands your wallet; And you hand it over, does that mean by your logic you weren't robbed? You handed over the wallet, it wasn't pried from your hands. Right?
@@smugfrog8111 First of all, I am not suggesting they give up all their rights. I'm just saying certain people in certain jobs, working for the government. MUST be willing to let go of certain rights for the greater good of humanity. You are blowing this WAY out of proportion.
@@colonbina1flights 5 and 6, which shared very similar profiles, and identical hardware, were 5 weeks apart. It stands to reason that moving up to an upgraded booster/ship and crunching all the data from flight 6 may well take longer than 5 weeks - which puts us close to the new year already, even if IFT 6 is nearly flawless. Could they do it? Probably. If they want to get the most out of every flight and maximize the chances of success at every stage they may choose to take their time.
@@colonbina1 Mainly regulatory approval, they'll want some leap forward from flight 6 which will require significant time to review by SpaceX themselves and then the FAA.
I'd say launch 32 and have that sucker do a total orbit and a bit and land in the Indian Ocean. We still do not know if the ship can do an orbit. And do a re-re-re-fire of the engines in space and open the pez doors. Use this ship as a full test mission.
Ever notice that starship is currently in development, she is not a finished product, neither is sls. Ever notice that starship has already launched at least three times this year and will probably launch another two or three times before the year ends. Ever notice that SpaceX is sending more ships in to space than any other company. And either has. Or will rescue two astronauts stranded on the ISS that NASA was unable to bring them back.
Stupid name. You obviously do not know that the Nazis' missile used against civilians in Great Briton was called the V2. I hope the new Starship is called the STARSHIP. No new name no stupid new name no disregard for history.
Grow up bro V just stands for version dude. in ww2 it was called a V2 because it was an abbreviation of "Vergeltungswaffe Zwei". people call 90% of things with a second version "V2" plus noone cares. you mention to not disregard history yet you disregard historical context.
I think next year Space-X will do more than 10 Starship flights. Greater than double this year. I think by H2 next year the emphasis will shift to driving down time between flights.
I think next year Space-X will do more than 10 Starship flights. Greater than double this year. I think by H2 next year the emphasis will shift to driving down time between flights.
![กี่หมื่นฟ้า | Your Sky Series EP.1 [1/4]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/vLGjxFL6U_I/mqdefault.jpg)
Might be a dumb question, but I am going to ask anyway.
We have the:
• Falcon 9
• Falcon Heavy
• Starship
• When do we get the “Mothership”
Elon and Space X are so Far ahead in the civilian space race it will be hard to catch up! He has already proven how reliable his rockets are! Gonna be hard to catch up
Elon is either the greatest hero or the most clever villain!
Taking into consideration how rapidly SpaceX has progressed, I think they will launch flight 7 before the end of this year using Booster 14. The amount of flight data that can be achieved is very critical at this point of development.
SpaceX should fly Starship 32 with a reused booster 12 . Then send 32 to rendezvous with the Tesla Roadster for orbit to Mars or Venus or whatever. That would be cool.
F7 V2 5 flights sound good to me let’s do it go Space X 6:51
Waiting for B12a? Let's see it fly twice!!
Nothing but "catches" from here on out. It's a waste of precious time to be splashing down in the Ocean unnecessarily. Also it's high time to get at the minimum, some cargo missions touching down on the surface of Luna soon. Getting several hundreds and hundreds of tons of a wide variety of cargo safely to the selected location that Luna Base will occupy, will give us invaluable practice for when this shit starts to get REAL. The location for Luna Base needs to be hammered out ASAP. It should have abundant water ice and provide as much natural protection from cosmic rays as possible. Many materials provide at least some protection from cosmic rays. Integrating these materials into the bases modules is, of course, required. Material such as polyethylene, a good protector from cosmic rays, needs to be utilized extensively. Its light weight is a huge bonus. Anyhow, landing all this cargo gets us way ahead of the game and is a win-win proposition. Getting the process down pat now saves a lot of anxiety later. Let's hit that afterburner and get this shit moving guys!
The inventory of obsolete engines is valuable for high-risk tests or they will go to waste. They are expendable.
Tests to failure are not popular but valuable to identify design limits.
So if they catch the booster how are they going to be able to catch the starship. Will they have enough time to remove the booster before they need to catch the starship?
The tower is tall enough to catch the Starship while the booster is sitting on it. That's the only way it makes sense for rapid reusability. You catch the booster, then you catch the Starship and set it on the booster and it's ready to go for next flight
@@chadjensenster Risky at the start.
2nd launch tower at the start - one is just being finished - I would assume.
@@ThomasTomiczek yeah I was already assuming that but the second tower isn't completed yet
@@chadjensenster I don't think that would work in the test flights not enough time in between landings
Just read in a online article : Roscosmos CEO Yuri Borisov announced that the Amur rocket could be used "significantly more frequently" than SpaceX's Falcon 9 launch vehicle😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅
The russians are Always very funny
I love it, stick to the V2 for time, everything else will fall into place
They should start reusing the boosters and starships as soon as possible, to gain experience and workout buds before crewed missions.
I'm more interested in the Raptor 3's than anything else. Twiddling with the flappers or hull length is petty in comparison to what a difference the 3's will make in reliability, power, and savings in time and money in manufacture.
They need a Shake Down Cruise, and any bugs dealt with.
Hopefully the Enginerds dont overload them with sensors, and are satisfied with test fires etc. Especially after the repeat fire 34 times in ten minutes...
They are just gonna work guys, get used to it.
When something is well done, you can start forgetting about it... Theres even a line in the Tao about the syndrome.
Besides, I wanna see all the doubter's reactions, Should be an obvious difference in thrust, Zipping off the
pad, and out of sight...
Already pretty crazy how fast the R-2's accelerate that mass...
What will be best about R-3 introduction, is the effects on competitors.
Five stages of engineering grief likely, from grumbling, to getting to work on their own simpified, intergrally self cooled engines.
Then things will really take off... (😊)
I've been following Elon's Long March thru politics, with certain glee! Now Trumpster's Shadow, and everything getting run past Elon's thought processes, like having a Mentat in Dune...
I realized long ago that high functioning Aspies were the Mentats...
Could get traditional for real leaders, to have an Elon or Thomas Sowell around to augment the thinking.
All humorous to me, having suggested these kinds of things on Space Forums, and been an early suggester of politicalization to get results with the Bureaucracy Blob Monster.
Now the Bureaucracy has an Elon Monster chasing it... 😂
One who could apply parts count logic to required forms and steps... Like whats the absolute minimum amount of red tape for any public interaction with an agency...
And data already known to the government shouldnt have to be repeated on every application.
Just identify the person, pass needed data, and have the results be automatic.
Sure will be nice, that after the new year, launch delays from bureaucracy will hit zero! Then it will be just how fast can they build them and do the pre tests to fly...
Also was thinking with President Javier Milie
being buddies with Elon and the Donald, that maybe Argentina would be a good site for a ballistic sub orbital space port? it is the ends of the Earth in that direction, with Starship Tech being best applied to far points first.. Maybe the Roo-Rats down under could host a port too?
Also in the US a great place to start would be on mothballed air bases, like McCord outside Seattle, or one of the spare Fields at Eglin, or the base near Rantool in Illinois, they have airstrips to bring in troops and cargo, usually enough area for public safety, and could be repurposed into Space ports easily, and help reboot local economies.
Y'all do know the new economy is gonna be Space right?
And that we need to start inclining pretty much everything around that model. That the future major Ports will be Space ports. And the most production will be Space related...
So, maybe a good thing to think about in the budgets? Starting Reconstruction at a few choice bases, adding Rocket infrastructure and refurbishing the Air Ports... Sure the locals would appreciate the jobs, and seeing the bases brought back to life.
The best is yet to come folks, time to kick it into overdrive.
Without the Bureaucracy we will have money for everything.
Look at it this way;
Almost 3 million bureaucrats in the US, and about 40K homeless Vets...
Whats wrong with this picture?
I suggest Elon & Trump take care of the Vets better than the parachutes of the bureaucrats.
Just sayin'
Also, I love the Ariane 6 rocket! I hope it succeeds!
I think next year Space-X will do more than 10 Starship flights. Greater than double this year. I think by H2 next year the emphasis will shift to driving down time between flights.
Like my Grampaw used to say when i wanted some candy, "we'll see".
Wouldn't surprise me if flight 7 happens this year, they have the time and would want to max out their current 5 flights per year maximum
So badass. Im proud for him.
@ comments. First is that it is becoming increasingly clear that artificial gravity is the solution to many of the problems and hopefully we will see real testing of it soon. Secondly, the Ariane 6 is already completely obsolete as the days of throw away rocket is coming to an end. Even the Europeans now recognize that and are focusing on 2 new designs using reusable rockets
Most of the symptoms from artificial gravity can be negated through physical training, at least temporarily.
Do you live stream reacting to IFT launches?
Starship 3.0!!! Taller and hopefully wider, as well as booster! 12m diameter…!
Just nitpicking, but B14 or B15 "CHOISE"? Give me a break...
Wow And Double Wow!!!
Thank you Elon Musk. Go Team SpaceX!
I thought Starship launch was going to happen on the 18th? ie tomorrow
Flight 6. Targeting Tuesday, November 19 for Starship’s sixth flight test. A 30-minute launch window opens at 4:00 p.m. CT
@@mihlalibadiwe1590 cool
It was delayed one day
Flight 7 Christmas present
I would be more optimistic if Ariane 6 could do six flights in 2 months rather than 12 months. It is a make do project that will be costly and unreliable for Europe in the future.
F7-V2!
yup, if you want to do it right, it must resemble a cat, a nature's perfect design.
F7-V2 🎊
S7 V2 all the way!!!!!
Let's go this year🚀
I am wondering what will happen to NASA under the new Trump Administration. Since it will be dedicated to removing government misspending, an obvious target is NASA's rocket building program. Especially with Musk involved in the savings effort, along with streamlining the permit process for SpaceX, transferring rocket building to private companies would be an obvious help in cost savings.
NASA does not build rockets, the ULA builds the SLS and Vulcan. NASA issues the contracts to contractors to build the rockets, the only reason why the ULA still exists is cause Boeing, Lockheed Martin and Northrop give big money to political campaigns.
Even now there are news reports that NASA is already reviewing if the SLS is even viable at 2 billion per launch. NASA will most likely hold off on the SLS and wait until Star ship is matured and proven, Even Blue Origins New Glenn.
Flight 7 starship will be in December 15 2024 this year 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉ready for flight and catch for this year flight 8 is to go around the world and back home to land on the chop sticks
Yessir
🤣🤣🤣
Maybe flights to iss and mission duration should be reduced to 4months
F7-V2
We already knew about the astronauts 20 days ago? Why are we talkin about this? Their fine, and they were fine 20 days ago lol
Ariane 6 is not reusable, so it is noncompetitive.
Starship isn't reusable yet either. The idea it could be hasn't panned out.
Ariane 6 is not and never will be reusable. Starship is already partially reusable.
@@dgmcfadden2006 Starship doesn't even work yet. It still has to achieve full orbit to know that.
@ Hasn’t reached orbit by choice obviously and as directly stated!
@ I’ll also add, didn’t you notice them catching a 22 story booster the other day. LOL
F7V2
F7 V2🇺🇲👍🇺🇲
They will reuse B!3
❤❤❤
Could they reuse booster 13 for flight 7 ?
That might seem pretty ambitious, but who knows, right?
Too early and only 1st version of booster maybe 16 onwards for possible reuse
2 minute gang
Too many numbers that make this a who’s on first panoply of confusion.
F7 V2
Starship Integrated Fight Test 7 (IFT-7, or F7) will be a version 2 Starship. (V2, aka a Block 2 Starship.) V2 is an enlarged Starship with increased capacity main propellant tanks.
No catch=no fun
f7 V2
Need to complete orbit
F7 V2😅
So you are a MEGA great spacex ? not good
Cry harder
Cryo pod for you
Why don't Space X have a second variant of the falcon 9? A falcon nine with the non-reusable engine replaced with the new Raptor 3. They use the old falcon 9 for NASA missions. And get a bit of maturity into their Raptor 3 engines, by using it for Starlink launches. That would also give people a look at a fully reusable falcon 9. And showcase the benefits of rapid reusability.
Maturity into the Raptor 3 should be invaluable for their 2026 NASSA moon mission. NASSA being an indispensable customer.
Why would they do that? Totally different architechtures. Making falcon heavy took 5 years. And it just "strap" 2 more boosters on your booster. Do you think it would be benefical to build a whole new rocket (methane vs kerosin) for 5 billion dollars, just to get some runtime on raptor 3? Why not just spend 5 billion on starship to fly 40 times plus?
The falcon 9 uses merlin engines which are reusable, and they can't just swap the engines for a completely different one.
Falon9 already has several versions (iterations); Falcon 1, Falcon 9 v.1.0, Falcon 9 v.1.2, Falcon 9, and Falcon 9 Block 5
The upper stage is not designed for reentry and never will be. It's an old concept that was abandoned in favour of Starship
Go spaceship and booster flight 7 🎉🎉🎉🎉for Dec 15-18 to go around the world and back and land on the hopsticks both of them 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤ yes go for launch flight 7
Both
I read that blood circulates through the jugular in the wrong direction when in absence of gravity. That doesn't look very healthy to me. I'm not going to space for now 😂
Your cardiovascular system is pressurized through your four chambered heart. Blood would never flow backwards in an artery unless something went REALLY REALLY wrong.
so they say trump is hitler and elon develops a V2 rocket? hmmmm
The election is over. For the love of God, please let it go!!!
Hitler was a Socialist!
Great pattern recognition
For a preschooler
ARE YOU NOT ENTERTAINED?
build a brain chip and an iron skeleton of iron that fits the Human body with technology never seen before by Humanity eyes
NASA NEEDS to be more transparent. If you're an astronaut working for NASA you should not have any medical privacy rights, especially if they're related to space travel.
Agree
Wow, how easily you throw away someone's rights just to satisfy your curiosity about something that doesn't affect you.
@@davesilkstone6912 NASA is a gov agency, astronauts are gov employee's. Therefore they give up those rights. If NASA was a private company, I would then agree with you. And how do you know it doesn't effect me or anyone else! You must be REALLY smart!
@@davidyoung518 Though you are technically correct, this is a bad mindset rooted in the ideals and mentality of control, not liberty. You never "give up" your rights, they can only be taken from you. Just because you handed them over, does not mean they weren't wrongfully taken. If someone puts a gun in your face and demands your wallet; And you hand it over, does that mean by your logic you weren't robbed? You handed over the wallet, it wasn't pried from your hands. Right?
@@smugfrog8111 First of all, I am not suggesting they give up all their rights. I'm just saying certain people in certain jobs, working for the government. MUST be willing to let go of certain rights for the greater good of humanity. You are blowing this WAY out of proportion.
🙂👍🙏🚀
Flight 7 will not fly this year
Why do you think so?
Because he thinks 🤔
@@colonbina1flights 5 and 6, which shared very similar profiles, and identical hardware, were 5 weeks apart. It stands to reason that moving up to an upgraded booster/ship and crunching all the data from flight 6 may well take longer than 5 weeks - which puts us close to the new year already, even if IFT 6 is nearly flawless. Could they do it? Probably. If they want to get the most out of every flight and maximize the chances of success at every stage they may choose to take their time.
@@colonbina1 Mainly regulatory approval, they'll want some leap forward from flight 6 which will require significant time to review by SpaceX themselves and then the FAA.
6:20 sixth, not "sick-th"
🌼🌸🌹
I'd say launch 32 and have that sucker do a total orbit and a bit and land in the Indian Ocean. We still do not know if the ship can do an orbit. And do a re-re-re-fire of the engines in space and open the pez doors. Use this ship as a full test mission.
Ever notice that Starship is supposed to be fast launching. But even SLS can launch 2 or 3 times per year.
Ever notice that starship is currently in development, she is not a finished product, neither is sls.
Ever notice that starship has already launched at least three times this year and will probably launch another two or three times before the year ends. Ever notice that SpaceX is sending more ships in to space than any other company. And either has. Or will rescue two astronauts stranded on the ISS that NASA was unable to bring them back.
Stupid name. You obviously do not know that the Nazis' missile used against civilians in Great Briton was called the V2. I hope the new Starship is called the STARSHIP. No new name no stupid new name no disregard for history.
Grow up bro V just stands for version dude. in ww2 it was called a V2 because it was an abbreviation of "Vergeltungswaffe Zwei". people call 90% of things with a second version "V2" plus noone cares. you mention to not disregard history yet you disregard historical context.
WOW chill bro! that was 80 years ago and we dont hold grudges in 2024
Hitler was called son by his mother, no parent should call their male offspring "son". Said no one rver
@@mastifishthey're not calling them Adolf either and I think it's sad. The name isn't guilty and it's a cool name in my opinion.
I think next year Space-X will do more than 10 Starship flights. Greater than double this year. I think by H2 next year the emphasis will shift to driving down time between flights.
F7-V2
F7V2
I think next year Space-X will do more than 10 Starship flights. Greater than double this year. I think by H2 next year the emphasis will shift to driving down time between flights.