Great video. I had my AX100 delivered earlier this week. Still no regrets after seeing your review. I wanted a camera especially adapted for low light shooting. It appears I've made the right choice. The advanced image stabilization of the newer models would be nice but you can't have everything. Been using a GoPro black for almost a year. Good at what it does but no stabilization or zoom. Looking forward to the full camcorder experience.
In 2016 I watched this video as part of my camera decision making journey. I eventually purchased both the AX53 and AX100 and am glad I did. The AX 100 is clearly the better camera in good light down to well lit events. The manual controls work brilliantly and it is a very likeable camera. However there is a correction to be made on something said in this review. Like most people, you assume the larger sensor of the AX100 means better low light performance. In fact the AX53 is generally better. Why is that? - mostly because while the sensor is smaller it has less megapixels meaning the pixel size is close to the AX100’s pixels, plus the lens is one stop faster. It is also a more recent BSI sensor which also helps low light performance. Another thing to correct is that the BOSS system is the best available. In fact the ball stabilisation on the Panasonic VX1 is just as good. The Panasonic VX1 gets very little attention but should be considered in any buying decision. It has a wider lens than the AX53, and is slightly better in low light, plus it has stabilisation that works really well. It is also slightly smaller than the AX53, ad the VX1 is cheaper to buy. It represents better value for money.
Thanks for fine and great video, well done! I'm currently also looking on the Sony AX-53 and at same time the Panasonic HC-VX1 - Would you have any comments on the AX-53 compared with the HC-VX1 ?
I have not used the Panasonic, however, looking at specs, the AX-53 slightly beats the Panasonic in everything but still photos. The AX-53 has less total number of pixels, HOWEVER, both have the SAME SIZE SENSOR. So the number of pixels crammed into the same space is about double on the Panasonic. One of the nice things about the 53 is it uses LARGER Pixels, which do better at capturing low light. 53 also has an eye piece, which I didn't think I'd ever use, however, It has come in handy on a good number of occasions when I did not want the screen light interfering,. Looks like the panasonic has some software features for streaming or connecting to a phone that the 53 does not. Looking at everything overall, I'd still personally go with the 53. It has been 6 years since I did this review video, I've had my 53 since this video, and I still use it regularly. With the improvement of phone cameras, I do use my phone a LOT more now. My only complaint with keeping up with the times, which isn't likely solved by any possible software update, on either cameras, would be h.265. These cameras still use the less cpu intensive h.264. H.265 could cut the data usage in half. One of the other reasons I use my pone more. With a specific app, I can record in h.265 at 120mbit, which is the rough equivalent of recording in h.264 at 240mbit.
I don't get why they still worry about pixel count for still images. Just give us a sensor with 4k resolution and leave them as big as possible. We're long past the point where simply upping the pixel count is gonna make a difference to the quality of a photo. And anyone who cares about quality, is never gonna be taking photos with a camcorder! Give us the best VIDEO quality, and we're happy! And quit loading them with features we're never gonna use!
+Ash Scott Well put! and what about the live stream function! useless. locked to ustream. who the heck uses ustream! just put a simple Rtmp capability in it and you can stream to anyone!
@Open Paranormal Interesting! I am going to need to look into this further! As my iPhone 8 now has better regular (non low light) quality than my AX-53, and higher bit rate too (With ProMovie, I can film on my iphone 8 in 4k UHD at 60fps at 120mbit in h.265, so thats equivalent of approximately 240mbit in h.264 like all three of these use!) I need to find a use for my AX-53. Need to put it to more work. Sure, it's good for doing long events and what not, simpler to pull video off) but when regular video quality on a darn phone, hard to keep carrying these camcorders with me. If I can stream directly to youtube, there we go! Another use for it.
Love the AX100. I wish it didn't have the usb cable, not needed. I pull the battery and cards for charge and transfer. Wish it had 1080p120 that the new 53 has though. I use two AX100's for 3D and the cables gets in the way. Overall, AX100 is the oldest but still the best of these cameras.
An AX100 with the BOSS will be the ultimate camcorder. The 1" sensor provides an amazing picture. However, recording kids proved to be a challenge in getting smooth footage. I sold it for the AX53. The AX53 provides incredible smoothness. However, night or low light it sucks. The only issue I have had so for is the shoe area cracked from having it on a scorpion mount. :( Great review.
The AX53 has a significantly wider lens that the AX100 and somewhat wider that the AX33 which is a plus for me. Also you did not mention that the low light performance of the AX53 has been improved significantly over the AX33. Thanks for the review.
Great video, very informative for sure. Thanks for that, but I have a question.... I'm torn between the 53 and the 100... I want the features of the 100 with B.O.S.S. has Sony come out with something close to that?
I bought the AX53 in April and really like it. Absolutely no problems to date after filming in many different environments just to test the camera and particularly the 4k mode.My other camera is the Canon Vixia HF G30 which is an excellent prosumer model - but not 4k capable.Both have their pros/cons; but the lightweight AX53 sure makes it easy to bring along anywhere. As for the 4k aspect, I am recording it, but have not produced or edited any 4k video to watch. Just using it to 'future proof' the recordings. Thank you for an excellent review of all three Sony AX cameras!
Thanks so much for this review - really in depth and informative. I was just about to purchase the FDR-AX33 but couldn't find much needed information on how it performed in low light - will definitely be getting the AX53 instead after watching this, thanks.
Is the AX53 better then my NX30? Worth to buy one for upgrade? Full-HD image quality better on NX30 or AX53? XLR unit NX30 on AX53 possible? Thank’s in advance! Oeps! I forget almost to ask which camera is better in low light situation?
Unfortunately, the AXP55 is not available in USA or Canada, at least not officially. Not saying you cant get it, but it would not have a warranty. Unless, say, you purchased it in Japan, then went back to japan to honor the warranty. This time around, they just gave us the AX53. They did the same with the AX33, no projector. The AXP55 is the same as the AX53 only without the projector. I have the projector on my old 1080p PJR-380, and it is amazing! But it also doubled the cost of the camera (At the time it was $500 with the projector, or ~$240ish without for virtually identical model). It's nice to have, but not worth the extra cost to me. Either way, I carry my old 1080p camcorder with me anyways in my camera case as it's so dang small, so if I need to project, I just patch a HDMI cable from my AX53 to the 380.
Man, oh MAN is this a great comparison video. It made me, a filmmaker who's ready to step up to 4K, think about what I really NEED, not what would be cool to HAVE. You laid out enough pros and cons to sink a Nimitz class aircraft carrier. And yes, Precision Camera, Sony's only authorized repair center, isn't doing them any favors with how they run things. Also, that's one super-suave fedora. I trust a sharp-dressed man who knows his 4K options. No - thank YOU!
i just started looking at video cameras for the first time, looking for dark settings, within the car. So the IS is pretty much mandatory. Sounds like the 53 is the best option for me. Are these the staples within the industry, or would there possibly be other brands with a hybrid type that has a better cmos like the 100 along with a very good IS like the 53. Thanks for any input.
I don't get why people say the AX100 one inch sensor produces a better image. On the side by side comparisons I see the AX53 is way more clear and sharp, even noticing the white dandelions floating around the screen whereas on the AX33 and AX100 the sky was more blown out, the grass much duller and less detailed and overall a worse quality. Not by much, but still noticeable. Also, on the low light shots, the AX100 had noise on it. You could produce that brightness in low light on the AX53 by adjusting the manual lighting no? I would assume if you turned up the manual light on the AX53 it would produce lighter video during the night but with noise, much like the AX100 is doing on auto. The AX53 seems to be the winner on all fronts especially considering the AX100 doesn't have stablization.
Will be using the camera for video podcasting to upload on TH-cam. Am between the AX33 and AX53 here. I will be buying lighting so overall low light shouldn't be an issue. What are your thoughts?
I'd spend the extra $200 and go for the AX53. It performs so much better. Low light "shouldn't" be a issue, however, the larger pixels capturing more light, can still make a huge difference. Overall improvements are worth it!
Hi, Very nice review! Is the AX53(20x optical zoom) a better bet over the AX33(10x optical zoom) for sideline videos at kids soccer and little league baseball games? I'm having a hard time deciding. Decisions,decisions. Thank you!
hello, just ad advice: I have to recorder soccere game; wich is the best camera to buy? i moved it on tripod continuously following the players. thanks in advance
Thanks! This is one of the best comparison reviews. I watched many videos .. that never help the viewer's buying decision. You covered all the main bases. I used to shoot w a Sony fx1 .. loved it. The world went digital and DSLR. So I switched too. Dslrs take all the fun out of outdoor shooting ... we had to have a myriad of attachments on dslrs to accomplish the same thing a cheap came with out of the box. Thanks again
Thank you, Your review helped a lot. Went for the newer FDR AX53. Realized my needs fit into mostly the auto features and found the Bigger sensor at this time isn't worth the price difference for me at this time. Add that floating lens in the 53 as appose to soft wear steady shots in the 100 was the closer on the 53. Getting a Tascam d70 4 channel and a new tripod with the money I saved. Thanks again for your review, Subscribed and looking forward to what else you may have to show us. Cheers.
Wow. Sorry you've had a crappy experience with that 33 and 53. Updates? What was the final outcome? I do notice the 53 is lighter but also feels....hollower? Is that a thing? Lol. But I do like it. I got mine used and hopefully no issues.
I stuck with the ax-53. generally been happy with it. Overall, i liked the 33 better, but the 53 had better low light in the end, which was important for me. really missed the built in usb cable though. Still, in terms of camcorders, sony is very behind right now. pretty much ditched camcorders in general for 95% of my recordings in favor of a iphone with “Promovie” app that lets me record in h.265 at 120mbit. sony still only allows 100mbit in h.264. in comparison, that means the iphone is encoding at the equivalent of 240 mbit in h.264. so over 2x the quality. for video where i don’t need the BOSS stabilization, the phone beats the living crap out of all three of these cameras.
Thumbs up from me! The test footage at the start was brilliant, I'd like to see more of this in future reviews. I have a PJ620 with the same internal gimbals, it works fantastic, not 4k though.
thank you, take a look at my channel I have a number of other reviews on the a x 53, including a freehand night shot 250 X zoom to the moon, and another demonstrating the better fullscreen Night view and tripod moon zoom
if you want to Zoom in, AX-53. i’m not familiar with the ax43. If you want the highest frame rate for sports, realistically a iphone 8 or higher with the app promovie
Would any of these be good for everyday recording? I want to start carrying a camera around & just documenting everything. Which would you recommend? Thanks
for non tripod shooting, choose either the AX33 or AX53. The optical stabilization beats the living crap out of the older ax100. The AX53 weighs less, though the AX33 is smaller. The AX53 will offer better low light shooting though.
John Fire officially, The ax100 would or should do a better job of night shooting. however, here was my recording of fireworks this past summer with my 53, th-cam.com/video/sAQ6vGs3BXE/w-d-xo.html
very helpfull comparison, i buyed a AX33 and im glad of this cam! also in the night city i don't fell much noise, i don't think to change it whit another handycam, but for a cinematographic use i have a Alpha 7S...
Perfect knowledge of three cameras and video very useful to make decisions about the 3 amateur cameras from Sony 4K. One of the most enlightening tests I've seen. I have an ax33 and I'm desperately looking for another camera that solves two big problems: low light and slow motion. I can not find in the three cameras, answers. But what about the Sony PXW-X70? Without the handle has reasonable dimensions to carry, excellent stabilizer and very good slow motion.
I went with the AX53. I plan to take it to Disney World and record some dark rides. From my experience at home so far, it seems best to leave off the night mode and low lux modes and limit the AGC to reduce noise. Even with the limit, I'm hoping it will still bring in more light with minimal noise compared to my phone (Galaxy S8+). One thing I wonder though is how it can bring in more light when the phone has a f-stop of 1.7 while the Sony has a f-stop of 2.0. Maybe just the fact that the lens is bigger will make the difference?
Excellent video - thanks. My problem is kind of specific. Besides family, pets and all the usual, I love shooting RC planes (flying) and for that, you absolutely have to have a viewfinder / eye piece, preferably one that can be adjusted up. When the planes are on the ground I like to shoot them there as well with a walk-around. Secondly, I need a nice manual focus, preferably a ring around the lens and I can't be going into some menu to set it to manual every time I stop and start recording. Thirdly, I need big time zoom. Now, if you buy an HD camera, you can get 50x, but these 4K seem to be around 20x what's up with that? I'd even like to screw on a telephoto lens once in a while. Lastly, I can't spend an arm and a leg. Look, I'm just a retired old man that wants to shoot model airplanes on the weekend now and then. Why does it have to be so hard? Why does it have to be so expensive? Just adding an eyepiece takes you from a $158 Sony CX405 up to a $900 Canon G21 just for an eyepiece on an HD camcorder Geeessshhhhh! That's basicaly a $750 eyepiece! My 4K choices seem to be the Panasonic HC-WXF991K coming in around $800 and the Sony FDR-AX53 ditto. Black Friday is in two days and everybody has that 405 for around $158 bux. There's just no way you can zoom in on an RC plane going around in an oval (some fast / some slow) with that 405, I'm almost positive. There's no eyepiece, so you're going to have the sun and glare on that little screen and it's going to be impossible to see the plane. Appreciate your thoughts. Oh, years ago, I did all my shooting with one of those VHS-C cameras and it had the eyepiece, big time zoom and manual focus when needed. Gosh, I enjoyed that.
Great topic and vid - thank you! A quick Q for those who may have one or more of these... If you already had an AX100 and wanted a second camera to videotape an interview or event, would you get another AX100; or the AX33 ...or AX53? In other words, i am asking if you think the image quality of the AX33 or AX53 be similar enough to the AX100 when cut back and forth?
I had the buffer overrun problem w/ my cheap sony several yrs ago - the intro cx1 something. I got a replacement of same and it worked. I got a panasonic too and never had that problem
Thank you for the review, but what do you think of JVC GC-PX100BEU? is it good for professional use? i would like to know your advice before i make any choice. thank you in advance.
I am seriously considering the AX 100 or the CX 900, I don't think I need 4k right now but do you think it's wise to go with the 4k? You mentioned you can buy $13 dollar 3rd party batteries, can you send me the link to them- It would also be great to have longer lived batteries. Thank you, your video was very helpful Dave
Guys says he doesn't like refurbished so he buys open box. Open box, by definition, means the buyer returned it and it's been passed right on to you. Maybe it was returned because it was a lemon. Refurbished means that it's gone back to the factory and fixed and then gone through a complete inspection process much more rigorous than when it was first manufactured. I've bought a ton of refurbished items including cameras and laptops and never had a problem. Heard lots of complaints about open box including right in this video!
Hi thank you for your excellent video I have a Sony Handycam FDR-AX33 I have a little field monitor 4K but when recording it says will not outputting 4k if I use this atomos shotgun or ninja Assassin will this screen still work for me as I can use it as a bigger screen as well as a recording device or will it just switch off like my little field monitor does when I press record or do i need the AX100
@@KmanAuto so how do I use a field monitor as I want to get a bigger display a lot easier for making videos is there any way around it even with with the Atmos it still will not work? I don't need to actually outputting 4K I just need to output a display so I can see a lot better if that makes sense
how long can you film at 120 fps , I own ax100 for 1 year now and it seems that it never disappointed me , taking pictures is not my forte but i manage to control the image quality at different levels of lighting while i film. Please advise thanks
Hello, you are a well doing the comparing these products that i'm going to pick one. First I know China making product unlike used to be "Made in Japan". I've read some people posted about capturing 4 K video, the 53 is shaky, why? and what is the difference between AX 53 and AX 53/B? Thanks!
I want to have the consulting for Live Stream, I get a sony AX 53 and a Ultra Capture(Aver media) w/ OBS program but it is a not so good. if you charge me, What's the cost?
great presentation, but curiously fopr something SO thorough, I did not hear mention the only thing I was saw immediately as the improvment from the 33 to the next gen 53 and that is greater optical zoom from 10x to 20x, a full doubling. also along w/ this is what sony calls 'clear image zoom' - the 523 has a longer C I Z than the prev models. it wd have been nice for Kman to also comment and assess this - both the lens / zoom detail as well as the comparative differences.
Great video. I now know that AX100 has the better picture. Stability is the issue, of course, and I'm told that in AX53 the BOSS doesn't work in filming 4K. This doesn't make sense to me as BOSS is in the camera suspension, right? No one seems to mention this in reviews. This is critical for me in choosing a camera. Thanks.
So the lens case still moves within the camera frame (structural) ... Intelligent active stabilization... software on the AX53, yes? And does the AX100 have comparable software. My question is: when walking across the room, filming someone, which camera will show less shaking in 4K... AX100 or AX53? That's something that deserves to be addressed singularly online as many are frustrated (link to accusation of Sony misleading consumers - sorry about the long URL..) [ www.sonyrumors.net/2016/01/27/sony-misleading-with-ax53-4k-handycam-balanced-optical-steadyshot-claims/ } and not having answers. I appreciate your expertise.
The lens and sensor are all floating on it's internal Gimbal inside the camera on the AX53. Stabilization Modes: Off= BOSS system turned off, and camera will not do any stabilization. Best for Tripod use. Standard= BOSS System Turned on (Floating Lens and Sensor) Active= BOSS System ON, + The camera crops some of the image to perform digital stabilization Intelligent Active = Same as Active, however, adjusts automatically accordingly and you loose MUCH MORE of your image for digital stabilization. Off, Standard and Active are available when shooting in 4k, Intelligent Active is available only in 1080 or lower resolutions due to the extreme loss cropping of the image for the digital stabilization. The difference is night and day between the AX100 and the AX53 in terms of walking while recording. Turn on the camera app on your phone, and walk across the room, thats what the AX100 will look like in terms of stabilization. The AX53 (And 33) with the BOSS system, would be CONSIDERABLY better.
We all know that moving parts are prone to failure more often than non-moving parts. Do you think that the BOSS optical stabilization system may be a cause for concern from this point of view?
I think so depending on how the camera is treated and taken care of, I just got a ax53 so can't attest to the longevity of the gimbal like B.O.S.S setup, but all the floor models were not acting correctly
Guys, I got ax100 and it seems not strong AF (blurring, very slow) I don't know if any of a6100 or a6600 or Zv1 could match or give better image quality than ax100 because the lens in AX100 is very good. I understand the sensors difference from 1 inch sensor all the way to Aps-c but still the lens in ax100 is very good (if anyone knows how much the lens cost of ax100? In equivalent to sony lens?) Both Zv1 and ax100 is one inch sensor both same sensor but I don't know if zv1 lens could beat or same ax100 lens? Do you think that a6600 or a6100 can beat the ax100 or zv1 with their own lens come with the body (in term of video quality)?
They will perform basically the same when connected to a external device via HDMI, I'm still a firm believer that the AX-53 will provide the best picture quality out of the three in low light.
Very informative and helpful. I came here to review the AX100 with a mind to buying one for church/lecture use in crappy lighting, and your examples pretty much nailed that as the one to go for. But out of curiosity, do you know of any other camcorders in a similar quality range that are good with low light? We've been using a JVC gz-hd7e which just got retired which did 1080i, 3ccd, tripod only use but artifacts in the shadows. It's used in what was originally a dance hall kind of room so the lighting is dull and there are shadows everywhere. Any suggestions are appreciated. I'm supposed to take over the video recording eventually so I want to get off to a good start.
To get any better in low light, prepare to spend 2-4x the money. The cameras do have a Low-Light mode, which can increase pixelation a bit, but does improve it. I've had very good success with my AX53 in the low light. It's cheaper then the AX100, and the larger Pixels in it allow for better low light. Having had experience with all 3 cameras, I'd rate the AX100 and AX53 about the same with Low light. I've done some very very nice low light shots that turned out very well. Including doing a 20 minute talk about how Tesla Autopilot radar works, from the comfort of my drivers seat using just the map light. Some Artifacts in the shadows, but considering the much poorer lighting condition in the car using a map light, it performed spectacularly.
So, apart from the AX100 and the AX53 there isn't really anything else that compares at that level? The more I look at it the more I want one for my own personal use too.
HDR-PJ380 1080p at 25mbit. On the review portion (Not the parts with the 4k clips) I did HEAVY processing to upscale the 1080p to 4k UHD since, I could not record the video on the cameras that were being used to review. In actuality, the PJ380, with its TINY sensor, produces a very bad picture in anything but the brightest of light.
+Desert Derpers I've played around with green screen. it will work good. I even have my own formulation of green screen paint I sell. $15/gallon + shipping
Very helpful. Learned a lot. But, you didn't discuss Wi-Fi or remote control options, which is an area of functionality about which I'm very interested.
INTERNAL Memory is your best choice --Sony HDR XR500 -- BUILT Like a Sherman Tank and works BEST for youtube video making.. You can find them on ebay for around 5 to 800 bucks ! Best Sony Camera ever made!
+diyautoschool built like a tank, but very dated. 24mbit, 1080i so interlaced picture and very tiny sensor. a cheap handy am from Walmart will yield better features and image quality. And it doesn't have sd slot, only Sony memory stick. thiugh 128 gig internal memory is great, it's really not that much. the ax100 is also a tank, and considerably more features and quality. maybe the xr500 as a beginner can if had cheap used from eBay, but no, not a good TH-cam camera this day and age. especially with the transition to 4K let alone 1080 interlaced.
KmanAuto so Just to be 100% clear. while recording in 4k you can output from the hdmi port video, just not 4k video? very important as this is for a church. would you recommend any camcorders for live streaming while recording?
I saw in other reviews that the ax53 had trouble while on a tripod - mostly when some form of stabilization is on, but one review said there were img stability problems even turned off when on a tripod. Boss apparently is good to emulate a tripod, but when you are on a tripod, this causes problpems. what say you, Kman on this ? My use is general point and shoot / documenting, but also a major use is filming school plays in the back w/ a tripod. I dont want my smooth looks upset , so I am copncerned ( was going for the ax53 til I read about these ).
Hi, I can NOT decide between a AX53 and an AX33, I normally just keep my Sony HandyCam plugged into my laptop for everything, but some have said the 53 is better, others say the 33 is better, but you have all 3, so you say?????
As in many life decisions, it comes down to "what do you need". Your comparison was incredible in making my choice for value and needs. Thank you for an incredibly helpful consumer analysis. I am looking to get the Sony AX53.
I cannot thank you enough for this riveting informative video....man did you clear up some questions I had. In the end AX-33 will be the compact general use choice for me. If you ever want to know about cast iron cookware, drop a line.
KmanAuto : Great.....cast iron by companies that went from raw uncontaminated alloy to finished product. In the turn of the 1900's and before the World Wars is where the best iron resides. Now, back to cameras, my budget needs to be spread out with upgrades including a new computer. I believe I must bow to AX33 after considering all you mention and not seeing AX100's used at the same price. Low light will not be more then a very small percentage of shooting and if it all actually hinges on that alone, I like the very small package AX33 offers. Should I come across some extra cash, that will be a game changer. However, I do not need the BOSS, but I will want the BOSS as I have so much gear without it. Thank you again.
do you ever do any comparison's w/ comparable pannys? I have a panny in full hd amd very satisfied w/ it ( 3 cmos) and was looking now to go to 4k. I believe the panny HC-WXF991K compares to the 53 in price point and overall function
I OWN THE FDR-AX33 I UPDATED THE ORIGINAL FIRMWARE 1.0 TO 1.10 VERY EASILY USB ON WINDOWS 10 I CONNECT THIS CAMERA WIRELESS TO MY COMPUTER AND I CAN USE IT AS SURVEILLANCE CAMERA I ADAPTED BLUETOOTH THIS CAMERA DOES NOT COME WITH REMOTE CONTROL LIKE THE HIGHER MODEL I ALSO ADAPTED A TRIP OF LED LIGHTS VERY WISELY AND LOOKS AWESOME ANYONE SEES MY CAMERA ASKS ME WHERE YOU GOT IT?
Hi Kman, I've been offered the AX53 for $200 because the internal mic isn't working. Is there a way to get this repaired or perhaps would a shoe microphone work?
yes, sony will service it. otherwise a shoe mic would work as long as you don’t mind the inconvenience. when shooting in 4k, audio is only stereo anyways. 5.1 only works in 1080p or less for some reason.
I’m trying to decide between the AX 53 and the AX 700. Does anyone know if there is a difference in stabilization between the two when filming in 4K????
Tristen and Christian's Playroom Glad I could Help :-) be sure to like and subscribe, and please consider purchasing through the links in the description to help support the channel.
AX-53. It has served me well. HOWEVER, i realistically stopped using it for daily recording about 4 years ago. It’s now a secondary camera. My iPhone 8 and XS are now my primaries. I use an app called ProMovie. It lets me record in 4k 60 FPS in h.265 codec at 120mbit. That’s the rough equivalent of the AX53 recording at 240 mbit, as h.265 can yield same results in ~1/2 the bit rate. AX53 is still my go to when i will be recording with a lot of motion.
So my 33 is junk? I filmed a zoomed close up of the super moon the other night and it has noise like confetti dancing all over. Unusable. And I was in manual settings to so looking to upgrade. I want whatever the next ax100 is. Ax200? When is it coming out?
No idea when the next ax100 version style is coming, the AX100 became the ax33, then the ax53. Personally, take a look at the 53. 1.6x larger pixels. I also have some moon shots online. Don't forget, digital zoom is from the devil! Take a look at these from my AX53. th-cam.com/video/0120FZhyoR4/w-d-xo.html and th-cam.com/video/iBHquJpO4FI/w-d-xo.html I think you will be impressed.
I am a youtube content creator, and I am looking to get the FDR-AX53, as I sometimes shoot in lower light conditions, I would ideally like to get the FDR AX100 but its out of my price range at the moment in time tell my channel grows. what would your opinion be? thank you for making such an informative video,
After continuing to compare my AX53 (What I ended up choosing) to my friends older AX100 over the past year since producing this video, I have determined, unless you need the endless built in features of the AX100, the low light, and the BOSS stabilization on the AX53 seem to have the AX100 beat. With the 1.6x larger pixels, I'd rate the low light comparable. With Night Mode active (The green filter that comes on), the AX100 is superior, but in normal shooting, with and without regular low light mode, the AX53 I personally feel is equal or better.
Wait! AX53 can stop recording by itself? How??? Im planing to buy it for recording fast moving objects (plane spotting). What I heard now freaks me out. Please respond!
I would love a more prosumer Camera with BOSS stabilization. Until that happens the AX53 will be my daily driver. I am in my 50's now and sadly my hands are very shaky. BOSS is magical.
Tollbar You’re absolutely welcome! 28 if you wouldn’t mind hitting the subscribe button and the like button. also please consider using the provided links in the listing to make your purchase of your camera :-)
Hi Great video I have just purchased this camcorder and I am having problem with editing in 1080p I used light works for editing. The video slows down and skips when editing Please can you tell me what software you use for editing and how can I solve this problem. I have searched the Internet but had no luck. Please can you help Thx
Thanks! Be sure to like, subscribe and share! As for light works, From what I can tell, it looks to be a bit dated in terms of video editors. Try something a bit newer, such as CyberLink Power Director. amzn.to/290nX6o for some details. They also have a trial version with some functionality limited. Its all I use now.
Btw: Sony is releasing the new AX700 with the stacked 1" sensor in December 2017... ;) Yepp, large sensor camcorders are rare unicorns. That's why a lot of video folks switched over to DSLRs and Mirrorless systems. Even MFT (4/3") is a much larger sensor than 1", the APS-C and fullframe sensors are taking the top spots. But: It also depends on the sensor readout and the software which video quality you gonna get... ;) But for most folks it's gonna be like: camcorders are easier to use if you're only shooting video...
+UncleManuel That's awesome! can't afford a upgrade though. Bad yes all I do is video, camcorder is easier and more convenient. Heck I can still fit the 53 in my pocket at a event, and doesn't weight a ton to hold for a hour to film a keynote
Thank you very informative. I've been looking at the ax 33 and 53. Stumbled across your video. Thanks for the information. Now I know a whole lot more about these cameras. But I think I'm at the same point that you're at.... I'm either going to roll a dice or flip a coin LOL.
Hi guys ! I am thinkong between ax33 and ax53 but what about the time laps ? I saw ax53 has but i am nit sure ax 33 has that timelapse function ? Thy the answers
Hi. I just watched your video and thought it is pretty good. One thing missing on the 100 is the ability to external monitor while shooting in 4 K. This is unacceptable! I purchased the camera before knowing this. I have contacted Sony and there are a ton of others who have also complained about this. The theory is that it is this way to avoid buffer issues. But I have other cameras that run just fine with the external. And my Panasonic 1080p that is 9 years old runs the external beautifully while record in 60fps and 5.1 surround. This was a crippling development for me. And not discovered until after the 30 day return period. But for filmmakers such as myself, a no external monitor feature on 4K on a camera that cost nearly $2k is just unacceptable. I hoped early on Sony would patch with a firmware update. But that has since not happened... Your thoughts?
![[Sub Thai] APT. - ROSÉ & Bruno Mars](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/bYjhzP8x_uc/mqdefault.jpg)
Great video. I had my AX100 delivered earlier this week. Still no regrets after seeing your review. I wanted a camera especially adapted for low light shooting. It appears I've made the right choice. The advanced image stabilization of the newer models would be nice but you can't have everything. Been using a GoPro black for almost a year. Good at what it does but no stabilization or zoom. Looking forward to the full camcorder experience.
Got the ax53,been using it for over 3yrs now without any issues at all,very pleased with the quality this camera produces
In 2016 I watched this video as part of my camera decision making journey. I eventually purchased both the AX53 and AX100 and am glad I did. The AX 100 is clearly the better camera in good light down to well lit events. The manual controls work brilliantly and it is a very likeable camera. However there is a correction to be made on something said in this review. Like most people, you assume the larger sensor of the AX100 means better low light performance. In fact the AX53 is generally better. Why is that? - mostly because while the sensor is smaller it has less megapixels meaning the pixel size is close to the AX100’s pixels, plus the lens is one stop faster. It is also a more recent BSI sensor which also helps low light performance.
Another thing to correct is that the BOSS system is the best available. In fact the ball stabilisation on the Panasonic VX1 is just as good. The Panasonic VX1 gets very little attention but should be considered in any buying decision. It has a wider lens than the AX53, and is slightly better in low light, plus it has stabilisation that works really well. It is also slightly smaller than the AX53, ad the VX1 is cheaper to buy. It represents better value for money.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but the Panasonic has no viewfinder if that matters when you shoot outdoors.
Thanks....ax53 is great....i use in my vídeos one ax33 and one ax53.......53 is better in low light.....thanks
Thanks for fine and great video, well done!
I'm currently also looking on the Sony AX-53 and at same time the Panasonic HC-VX1 - Would you have any comments on the AX-53 compared with the HC-VX1 ?
I have not used the Panasonic, however, looking at specs, the AX-53 slightly beats the Panasonic in everything but still photos.
The AX-53 has less total number of pixels, HOWEVER, both have the SAME SIZE SENSOR. So the number of pixels crammed into the same space is about double on the Panasonic. One of the nice things about the 53 is it uses LARGER Pixels, which do better at capturing low light.
53 also has an eye piece, which I didn't think I'd ever use, however, It has come in handy on a good number of occasions when I did not want the screen light interfering,.
Looks like the panasonic has some software features for streaming or connecting to a phone that the 53 does not. Looking at everything overall, I'd still personally go with the 53. It has been 6 years since I did this review video, I've had my 53 since this video, and I still use it regularly.
With the improvement of phone cameras, I do use my phone a LOT more now. My only complaint with keeping up with the times, which isn't likely solved by any possible software update, on either cameras, would be h.265. These cameras still use the less cpu intensive h.264. H.265 could cut the data usage in half. One of the other reasons I use my pone more. With a specific app, I can record in h.265 at 120mbit, which is the rough equivalent of recording in h.264 at 240mbit.
I don't get why they still worry about pixel count for still images. Just give us a sensor with 4k resolution and leave them as big as possible. We're long past the point where simply upping the pixel count is gonna make a difference to the quality of a photo. And anyone who cares about quality, is never gonna be taking photos with a camcorder! Give us the best VIDEO quality, and we're happy! And quit loading them with features we're never gonna use!
+Ash Scott Well put! and what about the live stream function! useless. locked to ustream. who the heck uses ustream! just put a simple Rtmp capability in it and you can stream to anyone!
I agree, bytheway unfortunatly they already give the videocameras with the best video quality, of course from 5000 dollars up to......
@Open Paranormal Interesting! I am going to need to look into this further! As my iPhone 8 now has better regular (non low light) quality than my AX-53, and higher bit rate too (With ProMovie, I can film on my iphone 8 in 4k UHD at 60fps at 120mbit in h.265, so thats equivalent of approximately 240mbit in h.264 like all three of these use!) I need to find a use for my AX-53. Need to put it to more work. Sure, it's good for doing long events and what not, simpler to pull video off) but when regular video quality on a darn phone, hard to keep carrying these camcorders with me. If I can stream directly to youtube, there we go! Another use for it.
as of march 2018 i think the sony ax 53 is the best choice 4k/ stabilized for the money
Love the AX100. I wish it didn't have the usb cable, not needed. I pull the battery and cards for charge and transfer. Wish it had 1080p120 that the new 53 has though. I use two AX100's for 3D and the cables gets in the way. Overall, AX100 is the oldest but still the best of these cameras.
An AX100 with the BOSS will be the ultimate camcorder. The 1" sensor provides an amazing picture. However, recording kids proved to be a challenge in getting smooth footage. I sold it for the AX53. The AX53 provides incredible smoothness. However, night or low light it sucks. The only issue I have had so for is the shoe area cracked from having it on a scorpion mount. :( Great review.
Thank You!
How did it prove to be a challenge?
I think company are playing with us, AX 100, 23, 30, 73 , 53, 33 it's a pure headache disorder
The AX53 has a significantly wider lens that the AX100 and somewhat wider that the AX33 which is a plus for me. Also you did not mention that the low light performance of the AX53 has been improved significantly over the AX33. Thanks for the review.
Great video, very informative for sure. Thanks for that, but I have a question....
I'm torn between the 53 and the 100... I want the features of the 100 with B.O.S.S. has Sony come out with something close to that?
I bought the AX53 in April and really like it. Absolutely no problems to date after filming in many different environments just to test the camera and particularly the 4k mode.My other camera is the Canon Vixia HF G30 which is an excellent prosumer model - but not 4k capable.Both have their pros/cons; but the lightweight AX53 sure makes it easy to bring along anywhere. As for the 4k aspect, I am recording it, but have not produced or edited any 4k video to watch. Just using it to 'future proof' the recordings. Thank you for an excellent review of all three Sony AX cameras!
Which one do you recommend me to buy for using on motorsports filming?
Thanks so much for this review - really in depth and informative. I was just about to purchase the FDR-AX33 but couldn't find much needed information on how it performed in low light - will definitely be getting the AX53 instead after watching this, thanks.
Is the AX53 better then my NX30? Worth to buy one for upgrade? Full-HD image quality better on NX30 or AX53? XLR unit NX30 on AX53 possible? Thank’s in advance! Oeps! I forget almost to ask which camera is better in low light situation?
can the AX53 take still pictures like a regular dslr per settings such as: F-stop, Speed, White-balance, ISO, firing a non-Sony flash, raw output?
Get AXP55.... till now its the best cam im using... seriously the best!
Unfortunately, the AXP55 is not available in USA or Canada, at least not officially. Not saying you cant get it, but it would not have a warranty. Unless, say, you purchased it in Japan, then went back to japan to honor the warranty.
This time around, they just gave us the AX53. They did the same with the AX33, no projector. The AXP55 is the same as the AX53 only without the projector.
I have the projector on my old 1080p PJR-380, and it is amazing! But it also doubled the cost of the camera (At the time it was $500 with the projector, or ~$240ish without for virtually identical model). It's nice to have, but not worth the extra cost to me. Either way, I carry my old 1080p camcorder with me anyways in my camera case as it's so dang small, so if I need to project, I just patch a HDMI cable from my AX53 to the 380.
Man, oh MAN is this a great comparison video. It made me, a filmmaker who's ready to step up to 4K, think about what I really NEED, not what would be cool to HAVE. You laid out enough pros and cons to sink a Nimitz class aircraft carrier.
And yes, Precision Camera, Sony's only authorized repair center, isn't doing them any favors with how they run things.
Also, that's one super-suave fedora. I trust a sharp-dressed man who knows his 4K options.
No - thank YOU!
Grazie.
i just started looking at video cameras for the first time, looking for dark settings, within the car. So the IS is pretty much mandatory. Sounds like the 53 is the best option for me. Are these the staples within the industry, or would there possibly be other brands with a hybrid type that has a better cmos like the 100 along with a very good IS like the 53. Thanks for any input.
I don't get why people say the AX100 one inch sensor produces a better image. On the side by side comparisons I see the AX53 is way more clear and sharp, even noticing the white dandelions floating around the screen whereas on the AX33 and AX100 the sky was more blown out, the grass much duller and less detailed and overall a worse quality. Not by much, but still noticeable. Also, on the low light shots, the AX100 had noise on it. You could produce that brightness in low light on the AX53 by adjusting the manual lighting no? I would assume if you turned up the manual light on the AX53 it would produce lighter video during the night but with noise, much like the AX100 is doing on auto. The AX53 seems to be the winner on all fronts especially considering the AX100 doesn't have stablization.
Thanks mate, I agree with you, that's why I bought the 53 and I am happy with it
Thanks for the video. It seems AX53 is the best for low light, surprising though, expected the AX100...
Will be using the camera for video podcasting to upload on TH-cam. Am between the AX33 and AX53 here. I will be buying lighting so overall low light shouldn't be an issue. What are your thoughts?
I'd spend the extra $200 and go for the AX53. It performs so much better. Low light "shouldn't" be a issue, however, the larger pixels capturing more light, can still make a huge difference. Overall improvements are worth it!
Nice video... This kind of camera has a wide angle like as an action cam?
Hi, Very nice review!
Is the AX53(20x optical zoom) a better bet over the AX33(10x optical zoom) for sideline videos at kids soccer and little league baseball games? I'm having a hard time deciding. Decisions,decisions.
Thank you!
The ax53 is considerably better.
hello, just ad advice: I have to recorder soccere game; wich is the best camera to buy? i moved it on tripod
continuously following the players. thanks in advance
Ax-53 out of the cameras shown. If you do not need 4k, you can switch to 1080p, and have a much higher frame rate for motion.
Thanks! This is one of the best comparison reviews. I watched many videos .. that never help the viewer's buying decision. You covered all the main bases. I used to shoot w a Sony fx1 .. loved it. The world went digital and DSLR. So I switched too. Dslrs take all the fun out of outdoor shooting ... we had to have a myriad of attachments on dslrs to accomplish the same thing a cheap came with out of the box. Thanks again
Thank you, Your review helped a lot. Went for the newer FDR AX53. Realized my needs fit into mostly the auto features and found the Bigger sensor at this time isn't worth the price difference for me at this time. Add that floating lens in the 53 as appose to soft wear steady shots in the 100 was the closer on the 53. Getting a Tascam d70 4 channel and a new tripod with the money I saved. Thanks again for your review, Subscribed and looking forward to what else you may have to show us. Cheers.
Wow. Sorry you've had a crappy experience with that 33 and 53.
Updates? What was the final outcome?
I do notice the 53 is lighter but also feels....hollower? Is that a thing? Lol. But I do like it. I got mine used and hopefully no issues.
I stuck with the ax-53. generally been happy with it. Overall, i liked the 33 better, but the 53 had better low light in the end, which was important for me. really missed the built in usb cable though.
Still, in terms of camcorders, sony is very behind right now. pretty much ditched camcorders in general for 95% of my recordings in favor of a iphone with “Promovie” app that lets me record in h.265 at 120mbit. sony still only allows 100mbit in h.264. in comparison, that means the iphone is encoding at the equivalent of 240 mbit in h.264. so over 2x the quality. for video where i don’t need the BOSS stabilization, the phone beats the living crap out of all three of these cameras.
Thumbs up from me!
The test footage at the start was brilliant, I'd like to see more of this in future reviews. I have a PJ620 with the same internal gimbals, it works fantastic, not 4k though.
thank you, take a look at my channel I have a number of other reviews on the a x 53, including a freehand night shot 250 X zoom to the moon, and another demonstrating the better fullscreen Night view and tripod moon zoom
Which one would you suggest for sports games? Soccer... i was also looking at the ax43.. thanks for video.
Or is there another camcorder that you would suggest... thanks in advance
if you want to Zoom in, AX-53. i’m not familiar with the ax43. If you want the highest frame rate for sports, realistically a iphone 8 or higher with the app promovie
KmanAuto thank you. I think I’m going for the 53
Would any of these be good for everyday recording? I want to start carrying a camera around & just documenting everything. Which would you recommend? Thanks
for non tripod shooting, choose either the AX33 or AX53. The optical stabilization beats the living crap out of the older ax100.
The AX53 weighs less, though the AX33 is smaller. The AX53 will offer better low light shooting though.
thanks for making this video - in the market for one and your review has helped. Thanks :)
Thanks for watching! Please consider purchasing through the links in the video!
@@KmanAuto Thanks will do :)
Which on would be best for filming fireworks? your answer would be greatly appreciated
John Fire officially, The ax100 would or should do a better job of night shooting. however, here was my recording of fireworks this past summer with my 53, th-cam.com/video/sAQ6vGs3BXE/w-d-xo.html
very helpfull comparison, i buyed a AX33 and im glad of this cam! also in the night city i don't fell much noise, i don't think to change it whit another handycam, but for a cinematographic use i have a Alpha 7S...
Perfect knowledge of three cameras and video very useful to make decisions about the 3 amateur cameras from Sony 4K. One of the most enlightening tests I've seen.
I have an ax33 and I'm desperately looking for another camera that solves two big problems: low light and slow motion. I can not find in the three cameras, answers. But what about the Sony PXW-X70? Without the handle has reasonable dimensions to carry, excellent stabilizer and very good slow motion.
Hi. Do you still use your AX33. I'm considering starting a YT video. Basic, but I still want it to be pretty. Would that camera do the job ?
I went with the AX53. I plan to take it to Disney World and record some dark rides. From my experience at home so far, it seems best to leave off the night mode and low lux modes and limit the AGC to reduce noise. Even with the limit, I'm hoping it will still bring in more light with minimal noise compared to my phone (Galaxy S8+). One thing I wonder though is how it can bring in more light when the phone has a f-stop of 1.7 while the Sony has a f-stop of 2.0. Maybe just the fact that the lens is bigger will make the difference?
Excellent video - thanks. My problem is kind of specific. Besides family, pets and all the usual, I love shooting RC planes (flying) and for that, you absolutely have to have a viewfinder / eye piece, preferably one that can be adjusted up. When the planes are on the ground I like to shoot them there as well with a walk-around. Secondly, I need a nice manual focus, preferably a ring around the lens and I can't be going into some menu to set it to manual every time I stop and start recording. Thirdly, I need big time zoom. Now, if you buy an HD camera, you can get 50x, but these 4K seem to be around 20x what's up with that? I'd even like to screw on a telephoto lens once in a while. Lastly, I can't spend an arm and a leg. Look, I'm just a retired old man that wants to shoot model airplanes on the weekend now and then. Why does it have to be so hard? Why does it have to be so expensive? Just adding an eyepiece takes you from a $158 Sony CX405 up to a $900 Canon G21 just for an eyepiece on an HD camcorder Geeessshhhhh! That's basicaly a $750 eyepiece! My 4K choices seem to be the Panasonic HC-WXF991K coming in around $800 and the Sony FDR-AX53 ditto. Black Friday is in two days and everybody has that 405 for around $158 bux. There's just no way you can zoom in on an RC plane going around in an oval (some fast / some slow) with that 405, I'm almost positive. There's no eyepiece, so you're going to have the sun and glare on that little screen and it's going to be impossible to see the plane. Appreciate your thoughts. Oh, years ago, I did all my shooting with one of those VHS-C cameras and it had the eyepiece, big time zoom and manual focus when needed. Gosh, I enjoyed that.
Great topic and vid - thank you!
A quick Q for those who may have one or more of these... If you already had an AX100 and wanted a second camera to videotape an interview or event, would you get another AX100; or the AX33 ...or AX53? In other words, i am asking if you think the image quality of the AX33 or AX53 be similar enough to the AX100 when cut back and forth?
Molewacker get the 53, with the. 1.6 times larger pixels, the lowlight quality is excellent
I had the buffer overrun problem w/ my cheap sony several yrs ago - the intro cx1 something. I got a replacement of same and it worked. I got a panasonic too and never had that problem
Thank you for the review, but what do you think of
JVC GC-PX100BEU? is it good for professional use? i would like to know your advice before i make any choice. thank you in advance.
I am seriously considering the AX 100 or the CX 900, I don't think I need 4k right now but do you think it's wise to go with the 4k? You mentioned you can buy $13 dollar 3rd party batteries, can you send me the link to them- It would also be great to have longer lived batteries.
Thank you, your video was very helpful
Dave
I have an AX100 and I'd say currently the best non pro priced camera looks to be the Panasonic GH5.
Guys says he doesn't like refurbished so he buys open box. Open box, by definition, means the buyer returned it and it's been passed right on to you. Maybe it was returned because it was a lemon. Refurbished means that it's gone back to the factory and fixed and then gone through a complete inspection process much more rigorous than when it was first manufactured. I've bought a ton of refurbished items including cameras and laptops and never had a problem. Heard lots of complaints about open box including right in this video!
Great comparison! I have the 33 and have noticed considerable noise even in indoor lighting areas.
Thank you. decided to go with the 53. comparable night shooting as the 100, but has the boss with was more important
Hi thank you for your excellent video I have a Sony Handycam FDR-AX33 I have a little field monitor 4K but when recording it says will not outputting 4k if I use this atomos shotgun or ninja Assassin will this screen still work for me as I can use it as a bigger screen as well as a recording device or will it just switch off like my little field monitor does when I press record or do i need the AX100
bodgit and leggit garage it will not output 4k while recording, only olayback
@@KmanAuto so how do I use a field monitor as I want to get a bigger display a lot easier for making videos is there any way around it even with with the Atmos it still will not work? I don't need to actually outputting 4K I just need to output a display so I can see a lot better if that makes sense
how long can you film at 120 fps , I own ax100 for 1 year now and it seems that it never disappointed me , taking pictures is not my forte but i manage to control the image quality at different levels of lighting while i film. Please advise thanks
Hello, you are a well doing the comparing these products that i'm going to pick one.
First I know China making product unlike used to be "Made in Japan". I've read
some people posted about capturing 4 K video, the 53 is shaky, why? and what
is the difference between AX 53 and AX 53/B? Thanks!
I want to have the consulting for Live Stream, I get a sony AX 53 and a Ultra Capture(Aver media)
w/ OBS program but it is a not so good. if you charge me, What's the cost?
great presentation, but curiously fopr something SO thorough, I did not hear mention the only thing I was saw immediately as the improvment from the 33 to the next gen 53 and that is greater optical zoom from 10x to 20x, a full doubling. also along w/ this is what sony calls 'clear image zoom' - the 523 has a longer C I Z than the prev models. it wd have been nice for Kman to also comment and assess this - both the lens / zoom detail as well as the comparative differences.
Great video. I now know that AX100 has the better picture. Stability is the issue, of course, and I'm told that in AX53 the BOSS doesn't work in filming 4K. This doesn't make sense to me as BOSS is in the camera suspension, right? No one seems to mention this in reviews. This is critical for me in choosing a camera. Thanks.
Boss word great in 4K. intelligent active (digital) stabilization does not, but not really needed anyways.
So the lens case still moves within the camera frame (structural) ... Intelligent active stabilization... software on the AX53, yes? And does the AX100 have comparable software. My question is: when walking across the room, filming someone, which camera will show less shaking in 4K... AX100 or AX53? That's something that deserves to be addressed singularly online as many are frustrated (link to accusation of Sony misleading consumers - sorry about the long URL..) [ www.sonyrumors.net/2016/01/27/sony-misleading-with-ax53-4k-handycam-balanced-optical-steadyshot-claims/ } and not having answers. I appreciate your expertise.
The lens and sensor are all floating on it's internal Gimbal inside the camera on the AX53.
Stabilization Modes:
Off= BOSS system turned off, and camera will not do any stabilization. Best for Tripod use.
Standard= BOSS System Turned on (Floating Lens and Sensor)
Active= BOSS System ON, + The camera crops some of the image to perform digital stabilization
Intelligent Active = Same as Active, however, adjusts automatically accordingly and you loose MUCH MORE of your image for digital stabilization.
Off, Standard and Active are available when shooting in 4k, Intelligent Active is available only in 1080 or lower resolutions due to the extreme loss cropping of the image for the digital stabilization.
The difference is night and day between the AX100 and the AX53 in terms of walking while recording. Turn on the camera app on your phone, and walk across the room, thats what the AX100 will look like in terms of stabilization. The AX53 (And 33) with the BOSS system, would be CONSIDERABLY better.
FDR-AX53 is the best for stabilization.
Many thanksl
Awesome video, thank you my friend. Thumps UP! Have a lovely evening.
We all know that moving parts are prone to failure more often than non-moving parts. Do you think that the BOSS optical stabilization system may be a cause for concern from this point of view?
I think so depending on how the camera is treated and taken care of, I just got a ax53 so can't attest to the longevity of the gimbal like B.O.S.S setup, but all the floor models were not acting correctly
I wonder why 4K camcorders don't have more zoom, like my good old Panasonic has 50x optical zoom.
are you using Panasonic V-777?
@@PreciousTimeTB Panasonic HC-V270
Guys, I got ax100 and it seems not strong AF (blurring, very slow) I don't know if any of a6100 or a6600 or Zv1 could match or give better image quality than ax100 because the lens in AX100 is very good.
I understand the sensors difference from 1 inch sensor all the way to Aps-c but still the lens in ax100 is very good (if anyone knows how much the lens cost of ax100? In equivalent to sony lens?)
Both Zv1 and ax100 is one inch sensor both same sensor but I don't know if zv1 lens could beat or same ax100 lens?
Do you think that a6600 or a6100 can beat the ax100 or zv1 with their own lens come with the body (in term of video quality)?
I need a camcorder with good DOF for wedding processionals. Will the ax100 foot the bill? Thanks good review
yes it will. if your not going to be walking around with it a lot, the ax100 will be best. but if you need stabilization get the ax53
Which one of these cameras are best for a video mixer and external monitor?
They will perform basically the same when connected to a external device via HDMI, I'm still a firm believer that the AX-53 will provide the best picture quality out of the three in low light.
Very informative and helpful. I came here to review the AX100 with a mind to buying one for church/lecture use in crappy lighting, and your examples pretty much nailed that as the one to go for. But out of curiosity, do you know of any other camcorders in a similar quality range that are good with low light? We've been using a JVC gz-hd7e which just got retired which did 1080i, 3ccd, tripod only use but artifacts in the shadows. It's used in what was originally a dance hall kind of room so the lighting is dull and there are shadows everywhere.
Any suggestions are appreciated. I'm supposed to take over the video recording eventually so I want to get off to a good start.
To get any better in low light, prepare to spend 2-4x the money. The cameras do have a Low-Light mode, which can increase pixelation a bit, but does improve it. I've had very good success with my AX53 in the low light. It's cheaper then the AX100, and the larger Pixels in it allow for better low light.
Having had experience with all 3 cameras, I'd rate the AX100 and AX53 about the same with Low light. I've done some very very nice low light shots that turned out very well. Including doing a 20 minute talk about how Tesla Autopilot radar works, from the comfort of my drivers seat using just the map light. Some Artifacts in the shadows, but considering the much poorer lighting condition in the car using a map light, it performed spectacularly.
So, apart from the AX100 and the AX53 there isn't really anything else that compares at that level? The more I look at it the more I want one for my own personal use too.
This video looks nice. What did you use to record it?
HDR-PJ380 1080p at 25mbit.
On the review portion (Not the parts with the 4k clips) I did HEAVY processing to upscale the 1080p to 4k UHD since, I could not record the video on the cameras that were being used to review. In actuality, the PJ380, with its TINY sensor, produces a very bad picture in anything but the brightest of light.
Would the ax33 be a suitable camera for doing greenscreen work or should I pick up the t6i dslr from cannon for that kind of application?
+Desert Derpers I've played around with green screen. it will work good. I even have my own formulation of green screen paint I sell. $15/gallon + shipping
I have ax 100 good enough in low light but not so good when you walking with it
Very helpful. Learned a lot. But, you didn't discuss Wi-Fi or remote control options, which is an area of functionality about which I'm very interested.
INTERNAL Memory is your best choice --Sony HDR XR500 -- BUILT Like a Sherman Tank and works BEST for youtube video making.. You can find them on ebay for around 5 to 800 bucks ! Best Sony Camera ever made!
+diyautoschool unfortunately it is t 4K. if it was 4K yes it would be awesome!
+diyautoschool and no boss
+diyautoschool built like a tank, but very dated. 24mbit, 1080i so interlaced picture and very tiny sensor. a cheap handy am from Walmart will yield better features and image quality. And it doesn't have sd slot, only Sony memory stick. thiugh 128 gig internal memory is great, it's really not that much. the ax100 is also a tank, and considerably more features and quality. maybe the xr500 as a beginner can if had cheap used from eBay, but no, not a good TH-cam camera this day and age. especially with the transition to 4K let alone 1080 interlaced.
OK! Thats why I have 5 youtube channels and all the videos I make are with the sony 500..
Would the Sony fdr ax33 be suitable for night time lapses of the Milky Way and night sky?
MICHELLE DALTON no, ax-53 or ax100
@@KmanAuto thank you
Thank you for making this video, it really came in handy for helping me make a good choices when buying my camera.
Hello K man, does any of these cameras support streaming out of HDMI output? Example for live streaming while recording?
Rodney Capps yep, I know on 53 and 100. never tried on the 33. recorded while outputting hdmi to my tv. I do not believe the 100 outputs 4K though
KmanAuto so Just to be 100% clear. while recording in 4k you can output from the hdmi port video, just not 4k video? very important as this is for a church. would you recommend any camcorders for live streaming while recording?
which of the three have the fastest zoom? also can you zoom in faster if you zoom in manually using the zoom ring?
I saw in other reviews that the ax53 had trouble while on a tripod - mostly when some form of stabilization is on, but one review said there were img stability problems even turned off when on a tripod. Boss apparently is good to emulate a tripod, but when you are on a tripod, this causes problpems. what say you, Kman on this ? My use is general point and shoot / documenting, but also a major use is filming school plays in the back w/ a tripod. I dont want my smooth looks upset , so I am copncerned ( was going for the ax53 til I read about these ).
Hi, I can NOT decide between a AX53 and an AX33, I normally just keep my Sony HandyCam plugged into my laptop for everything, but some have said the 53 is better, others say the 33 is better, but you have all 3, so you say?????
a1b2c3d4e535 is
@@achoysaephan9972 shut up
As in many life decisions, it comes down to "what do you need". Your comparison was incredible in making my choice for value and needs. Thank you for an incredibly helpful consumer analysis. I am looking to get the Sony AX53.
I cannot thank you enough for this riveting informative video....man did you clear up some questions I had. In the end AX-33 will be the compact general use choice for me. If you ever want to know about cast iron cookware, drop a line.
Glad to help! And I love cast iron. I use a frying pan and stew pot almost daily that are both around 125 years old.
KmanAuto : Great.....cast iron by companies that went from raw uncontaminated alloy to finished product. In the turn of the 1900's and before the World Wars is where the best iron resides. Now, back to cameras, my budget needs to be spread out with upgrades including a new computer. I believe I must bow to AX33 after considering all you mention and not seeing AX100's used at the same price. Low light will not be more then a very small percentage of shooting and if it all actually hinges on that alone, I like the very small package AX33 offers. Should I come across some extra cash, that will be a game changer. However, I do not need the BOSS, but I will want the BOSS as I have so much gear without it. Thank you again.
do you ever do any comparison's w/ comparable pannys? I have a panny in full hd amd very satisfied w/ it ( 3 cmos) and was looking now to go to 4k. I believe the panny HC-WXF991K compares to the 53 in price point and overall function
I OWN THE FDR-AX33 I UPDATED THE ORIGINAL FIRMWARE 1.0 TO 1.10 VERY EASILY USB ON WINDOWS 10 I CONNECT THIS CAMERA WIRELESS TO MY COMPUTER AND I CAN USE IT AS SURVEILLANCE CAMERA I ADAPTED BLUETOOTH THIS CAMERA DOES NOT COME WITH REMOTE CONTROL LIKE THE HIGHER MODEL I ALSO ADAPTED A TRIP OF LED LIGHTS VERY WISELY AND LOOKS AWESOME ANYONE SEES MY CAMERA ASKS ME WHERE YOU GOT IT?
Hi Kman, I've been offered the AX53 for $200 because the internal mic isn't working. Is there a way to get this repaired or perhaps would a shoe microphone work?
yes, sony will service it. otherwise a shoe mic would work as long as you don’t mind the inconvenience. when shooting in 4k, audio is only stereo anyways. 5.1 only works in 1080p or less for some reason.
@@KmanAuto Great stuff, appreciate your reply, I've thrown you a sub 👌
Thank you for this. AX-100 looks great!
Thanks for Your Detailed Camparision with these Models. Excellent presentation. i appericiate your video.
Faiyaz Khatri My pleasure! please consider if you decide to purchase one of the three, to use the Amazon links in the description!
Thanks
I’m trying to decide between the AX 53 and the AX 700. Does anyone know if there is a difference in stabilization between the two when filming in 4K????
Randy Rogers AX53’has the BOSS optical stabilization. The 700 i believe has a fixed lens
That was really informative, thank you!
Tristen and Christian's Playroom Glad I could Help :-) be sure to like and subscribe, and please consider purchasing through the links in the description to help support the channel.
Which one did you keep?
AX-53. It has served me well. HOWEVER, i realistically stopped using it for daily recording about 4 years ago. It’s now a secondary camera. My iPhone 8 and XS are now my primaries.
I use an app called ProMovie. It lets me record in 4k 60 FPS in h.265 codec at 120mbit. That’s the rough equivalent of the AX53 recording at 240 mbit, as h.265 can yield same results in ~1/2 the bit rate. AX53 is still my go to when i will be recording with a lot of motion.
Very useful presentation. I appreciate
So my 33 is junk? I filmed a zoomed close up of the super moon the other night and it has noise like confetti dancing all over. Unusable. And I was in manual settings to so looking to upgrade. I want whatever the next ax100 is. Ax200? When is it coming out?
No idea when the next ax100 version style is coming, the AX100 became the ax33, then the ax53.
Personally, take a look at the 53. 1.6x larger pixels. I also have some moon shots online. Don't forget, digital zoom is from the devil!
Take a look at these from my AX53.
th-cam.com/video/0120FZhyoR4/w-d-xo.html
and
th-cam.com/video/iBHquJpO4FI/w-d-xo.html
I think you will be impressed.
I would personally wait for SEC"17 in less than a couple of months and decide...
which one is better sony fdr ax33 or sony hdr pj810???
Agoraphobic News aX33 is better, but spend 200 more and get the 53
I bought a 53 blind... good thing I made the right choice
How many of you can report the AX53 issues of unexpected recording interruption and screen flickering?
I am a youtube content creator, and I am looking to get the FDR-AX53, as I sometimes shoot in lower light conditions, I would ideally like to get the FDR AX100 but its out of my price range at the moment in time tell my channel grows. what would your opinion be? thank you for making such an informative video,
After continuing to compare my AX53 (What I ended up choosing) to my friends older AX100 over the past year since producing this video, I have determined, unless you need the endless built in features of the AX100, the low light, and the BOSS stabilization on the AX53 seem to have the AX100 beat. With the 1.6x larger pixels, I'd rate the low light comparable. With Night Mode active (The green filter that comes on), the AX100 is superior, but in normal shooting, with and without regular low light mode, the AX53 I personally feel is equal or better.
QKH ASMR I am selling my AX100 for $900 if your interested. Let me know
what is the best sd card (size/speed) to use with these cameras? Specifically the 53. Thanks
GoProspecting see description of video for link
thanks, I was curious if the 150Mbps was to fast a card to use
as long as it meets the specs, it will work. i do recommend the card i link to. abused he crap out of my card and keeeps going
Wait! AX53 can stop recording by itself? How??? Im planing to buy it for recording fast moving objects (plane spotting). What I heard now freaks me out. Please respond!
+AirlinersHD the unit Amazon sent me ended up being a used return they marked as new. got a replacement and it has been a amazing camera!
which one for recording Theater Plays? this will be in low light with the only light coming from the stage. thank-you
+Julio Barrios ax53
THANK-YOU!
thanks for the review. ill wait till 2017 and if the ax100 doesn't have a replacement. she that one ill get.
I would love a more prosumer Camera with BOSS stabilization. Until that happens the AX53 will be my daily driver. I am in my 50's now and sadly my hands are very shaky. BOSS is magical.
Excellent video. I've learnt a lot from you about these 'corders - thank you for uploading.
Tollbar You’re absolutely welcome! 28 if you wouldn’t mind hitting the subscribe button and the like button. also please consider using the provided links in the listing to make your purchase of your camera :-)
hi, did you do test videos with these cameras ? thanks
NR yes
Hi
Great video
I have just purchased this camcorder and I am having problem with editing in 1080p
I used light works for editing.
The video slows down and skips when editing
Please can you tell me what software you use for editing and how can I solve this problem.
I have searched the Internet but had no luck.
Please can you help
Thx
Thanks! Be sure to like, subscribe and share!
As for light works, From what I can tell, it looks to be a bit dated in terms of video editors. Try something a bit newer, such as CyberLink Power Director. amzn.to/290nX6o for some details. They also have a trial version with some functionality limited. Its all I use now.
Btw: Sony is releasing the new AX700 with the stacked 1" sensor in December 2017... ;)
Yepp, large sensor camcorders are rare unicorns. That's why a lot of video folks switched over to DSLRs and Mirrorless systems. Even MFT (4/3") is a much larger sensor than 1", the APS-C and fullframe sensors are taking the top spots. But: It also depends on the sensor readout and the software which video quality you gonna get... ;)
But for most folks it's gonna be like: camcorders are easier to use if you're only shooting video...
+UncleManuel That's awesome! can't afford a upgrade though. Bad yes all I do is video, camcorder is easier and more convenient. Heck I can still fit the 53 in my pocket at a event, and doesn't weight a ton to hold for a hour to film a keynote
Thank you very informative. I've been looking at the ax 33 and 53. Stumbled across your video. Thanks for the information. Now I know a whole lot more about these cameras. But I think I'm at the same point that you're at.... I'm either going to roll a dice or flip a coin LOL.
Do you know if the AX53 works good with an Elgato Camlink?
It's listed as compatible, but don't know anything more than that.
The AX100 is just simply out of the equation. At that price and for those who that camera is targeted towards, you just buy an A6300 or A6500.
Hi guys !
I am thinkong between ax33 and ax53 but what about the time laps ? I saw ax53 has but i am nit sure ax 33 has that timelapse function ? Thy the answers
Can you record while charging via USB on the ax53?
What is the 43 ?
Hi. I just watched your video and thought it is pretty good. One thing missing on the 100 is the ability to external monitor while shooting in 4 K. This is unacceptable! I purchased the camera before knowing this. I have contacted Sony and there are a ton of others who have also complained about this. The theory is that it is this way to avoid buffer issues. But I have other cameras that run just fine with the external. And my Panasonic 1080p that is 9 years old runs the external beautifully while record in 60fps and 5.1 surround. This was a crippling development for me. And not discovered until after the 30 day return period.
But for filmmakers such as myself, a no external monitor feature on 4K on a camera that cost nearly $2k is just unacceptable. I hoped early on Sony would patch with a firmware update. But that has since not happened... Your thoughts?
No that isn't correct it has a std 3.5mm mic input.