Im looking at the comments and none of you are getting the point of how dangerous this is... that woman had no clue who he was and just because he had real time info about her she felt comfortable enought to stand up and interact with him as if he was a friend...
@@marcosmoura911 Yeah but imagine point your phone camera in someone's nose and doing this lol. But point taken, you are right. If they take a picture from a distance, the same can be done if the quality of the photo is high enough for the AI to scan and process
It is a good thing Meta made a statement that using their glasses in this way was a breach of the terms of service, Because criminals are well known for following the rules. 🙄
I'd say the glasses giving anyone access to ya information in an instant is the problem. It'd be way less of a problem if a person had to actually do all the work the glasses do to get ya information.
Well didn’t you just hear the guy say that even if you don’t purposefully put your info out there, people have their personal info leaked all the time. And the glasses pull all that info so, yes the glasses are a problem.
@@selwynandrews7716 your phone can take pictures too. Any camera can take a picture of your face. The problem is that having a photo of your face gives away a lot of personal info
You realize this technology can be used by any kind of device? All it needs is a picture, and if you're in public it is one hundred percent legal for anyone to just take a picture of you, go home, and run it through this AI. All the glasses do is streamline the process. Sueing or banning isn't the solution.
@RabidDisposition So by your logic if a person k*lls someone with a gun vs. poisoning them they are less culpable because shooting the victim is quicker? 🤦🏻 Make it make sense. Suing is a start to bring attention to how dangerous this is or do we wait until someone is harmed?
@@thea_therian He's correct though. They're using information that is readily available to the public online. The source of the data is almost entirely from the person being identified. If you've never posted images of yourself associated with yourself online facial recognition will not find you regardless of the data breaches they mentioned. You fell for the fearmongering aspect of the story.
If only hackers knew they were 'breaching terms of service,' they’d surely start behaving better right away. Thank you, Meta, for protecting us with your 'terms of service'-which really only serve to protect you, not your users or the victims of those who hack your devices.
@@Nobody-Nowhereyeah but would you stand in front of someone pointing a camera right in your face that’s hooked up to a computer and engage in casual conversation like nothing is amiss?
You know this is how hackers get jobs right? They do this stuff to get attention and in return, a job offer. This has been a tactic for several decades. Remember Anonymous? Several of the most prominent members evaded prison by accepting jobs from the US gov't.
@@robotman5105 and what is stopping someone from making their own glasses with pinhole cameras? As mentioned the technology is already available, just that it is implemented into meta's glasses. The tools for finding names, faces etc. is all opensource and online. I had a play with it myself and it is honestly quite scary. I found out about it 4 years ago, it is by no means "new" technology.
This is literally so dystopian and beyond unethical. This is so dangerous and unacceptable. How is it that ppl aren’t asking themselves at what point should we stop???
This is allowed by government and corporations already, any corner you're on you're bring tracked, and now you're suddenly concerned about the next Zuckerberg? You're about 20 years too late when your parents voted for George Bush and trashed all of our privacy rights.
You have to be No One. and i would advice everyone to never provide to anyone their personal info. Few tips how to avoid personal information leaks: - Your names should be always different on eveyr sistem, either asdadsasd or something else. - Your address, that you type in forms, should end in parcel locker location orr Postal Office or at worst your street without shouse number or unit. - You have to have 3-4 phone numbers.: 1 is personal or the people you trust or die for, 2nd is for people you know, 3rd one is for business or selling, 4th is for online internet. - last advice is to go and remove every possible personal info or picture from the Internet, and from Business Institutions.
Facial recognition in general from anybody should be banned and outlawed. It has already been shown to FALSELY charge the wrong people by getting confused.
Yeah, but, like ... that *mostly* only happens to people who aren't on the paler end of the spectrum, so can you *really* expect sillycon valley to worry about breaking a few eggs to make the omelette? /s
These students just exposed what any security camera could already do. You should be grateful that they told you something that you should already have known.
@@Mad_Catter_ bruh i got a letter from the hospital, data breach your info may have been stolen. CC info, location, ailments, Height weight gender blood type swimmer count...
Oh my god, the company that reached 1.5 trillion on the stock market by deploying a mass surveillance system to force-feed people targeted advertising just released a pair of sunglasses with cameras that help expand the reach of their surveillance system! How could this happen??!
They might have already been doing that. These people just unlocked premium or Admin features If this tech is in right hands not licensed for public use it's easy to catch criminals & decrease crime rate. But our history taught us true human nature. Things are always created & misused to destroy other humans.
Because it's obvious, that people already put their personal info all over the internet and don't practice internet safety. Idk how old you are, but when Instagram first used its GEO filter (people near you) someone used it in the EXACT same way. Found people using hashtags, their locations, and recently uploaded pictures. Back in the days of myspace, we were encouraged to lie about our names, sex, and location (A/S/L) but now people only post their A/S/Ls, but also what they're wearing, where they shop, their jogging routines, etc.
That will not happen at all. over 40,000 vehicles from fedex alone have cameras in which law enforcement does not need warrants to access. the school buses. the drones. there is no privacy. them wanting to put finger print readers on not only vehicles but just anywhere. you gotta start wearing finger print protectors by 2027 for sure. your phone has a finger print reader smaller than a penny so imagine others using it to create a collection. and any stride you use to justify privacy most people will give it up in one sad story. all they need is a crying mother with a sad story for people to give up their rights voluntarily.
Hey women. This is something the goverment already invented. Also why are you using your full name and photo on social media if your scared about thi?.
I highly doubt EVERY traffic cam and surveillance cam already uses this. But this technology is definitely being used by higher ups for certain things. E.g. It might be used near important buildings…presidential zones, big banks etc.
@@obsidianjane4413you have a point as well. People are using technology that is meant for good and turning it into something bad. But it’s hard to want to blame the company who is only trying to take us to the future. That’s like trying to shut down all gun manufacturers because guns kill people when in actuality people kill people.
I mean Google did this 10 years ago, only now computers are faster, people are sharing more about themselves online but you can‘t really blame Meta for this, it was gonna happen anyways. Just like brain-computer iterfaces will happen, just a matter of time.
@1:55 They say that it's a "breech of their terms of 'service'" because they don't want to share the ability to look up people's information at any time.
@@mensrea1251 Agree. I was pointing out the dual nature of the experiment mentioned in the video, that the journalist seemed to think is bringing a betterment.
@@NorthernChimp agreed. "Good AI news"? It was the worst and only news. However it only managed to reduce peoples opinions by 20% not 20% of peoples opinions, thankfully.
i recall seeing a cool AR demo concept video years ago kinda like cyberpunky the guy had glasses that did just that when looking at people and seeing what was missing in his fridge just looking at the fridge. etc
People too stupid to have done their own research on potential in technology, when it comes out they suddenly get hysterical like the dots haven't been slowly connecting for years
the bottomline is surveillance. If you want every single thing in your life to be under surveillance, life will become suffocating and you won't be able to pass as a good human. Everyone has some wrongdoing in their life and surveillance will get you for it. This is really bad. Expecting every single human to be 100% faultless is a disaster waiting to happen.
Exactly. MEDIA is only to protect governments and the Elite's. I'm more than sure they are preparing something Evil, with the excuse of Protecting populations, as Always done in history to destroy the low class. 🖤💀
@@HeatherFoster-nk5vn Easy, maybe, this quickly? Hell no. This tech takes the normally highly methodical and premeditated crime of stalking and turns it into something one can do fully impulsively. Once someone with a particularly predatory mindset has the power of these glasses on their head and gets something like this set up they can just grab any random person off of the street and be neck deep into gaslighting them by the time you can make and complete just one google search, fully inconspicuously, all on a whim. That is *horrifyingly* dangerous.
Restrictions on AI? What about severely punishing platforms (LIKE META) that request user private information and then lose it to these online databases (OR WILLINGLY SELL IT), this can all be done without the glasses, the glasses are merely a tool to make it more convinient but this isn't the core of the problem
Restrictions on AI definitely need to happen as well. It's been years since I first saw a humanoid model, and they already have more potential to cause more harm than any nuclear weapon.
This is misinformation, they clearly stated that they do AI it after taking a picture with a post program in a laptop you can do the same with your phone.
And they damn well know no normal person is reading that. That's why they can get away with it..."well you know, they actually violated our T&C, so that's not on us".
@@obsidianjane4413 guns can be dangerous but at least you can say they can be used for self defense.. now please enlighten us on how this is the same thing
@@coreyyyyyyyy At that point they are referring to personal data breaches, not photos. If you have never been on social media or in the news online, then how would a face match be made? I do doubt deleting photos now would help though....
Or not, if you're wearing glasses packed with infrared emitting LEDs to effectively blur your face from being captured in any cam device like those smart glasses.
There needs to be comprehensive legislation protecting people's privacy online. Unlike the bill passed by the GOP on May 2017 allowing the sale of anyone's browser history to anyone else.
Even if legislation is passed nothing will stop gvt agencies from using the technology to spy on you in the name of national security. Possibly they are doing it right now
@@Grieche-i8y they’ll be companies that host services you can pay for to ‘protect’ you data, you just have to give it all to them and hope they won’t settle in court
Just something to consider: Today, whether you live in a small town of 700 people or a bustling city, it’s nearly impossible to go a mile without being captured on some form of CCTV or surveillance system. The truth is, we don’t know what businesses are doing with their footage, and much of it is likely scanned using image or facial recognition software. If you don’t want to be recorded or have your face stored indefinitely, the only option is to stay indoors. Privacy, especially in public spaces, is essentially a thing of the past. Imagine being on holiday, taking photos or recording videos, and authorities demanding you delete your content because it captures other people. While we can "vote with our dollars" by avoiding certain technologies, it won’t stop others from using them. The reality is, this trend isn't going away.
Facebook Instagram TikTok aka X TH-cam AND all places PEOPLE chose to put themselves and others online.. Attaching their phones numbers and emails.. *THIS WOULD NOT BE AN ISSUE* If people didn’t live online..
I think the 4th amendment would block technology like this at a constitutional level. “Unreasonable search and seizure (of data)” certainly comes to mind when someone can use smart-glasses to look at you and instantly know the names of your parents and where you’ve worked in the past. Any evidence collected on individuals using these glasses would be inadmissible in court. They’re worthless for security services.
Or it’s just really smart students. First time I hear about this while the glasses have been out for almost 2 years now (we’re on the second version of these glasses)
What is really shocking, is that people cry about those glasses, not even realising, that the same thing can be done with a smartphone, a tablet, or any digital camera and a computer. So yes, like others pointed out, the glasses aren’t the problem. It’s online security and AI powered search capabilities.
There's a pretty big difference between a pair of glasses that simply takes pics, and one with ability to recognize everyone's faces, connect them with social media profiles, family members, addresses, phone numbers, SSN, etc, and then have an LLM summarize all of the details.
I always think of a breach of terms of service as a rather hollow defence. The moment I saw these existed, I could see them being used for many nefarious means - see that someone is out of their house with these glasses and then you get a friend to go to their home and break in - stalk someone, illicitly filming them without their permission - have someone hack glasses in a nearby area so that you can use all glasses in that area and have them as free hidden cameras in houses, changing rooms, bedrooms, etc. These things are a privacy nightmare!
I find it amazing how the line between 'neat' and 'ruinous' is found so quickly once a new piece of technology is released, particularly when it has any tie to social media.
well the cat is out of the bag there is no as long we are past that. maybe we can delay a little bit the cutting edge stuff but won't be for long so many people went in AI during the c19 lockdowns its no longer a fringe domain.
You have to factor in that she is a news broadcaster reporting on an issue that is directly related to a multi-billion dollar corporation. She is likely contractually obligated to not inject her own biases. I'm not defending Meta or anything
If you don't post pictures online or use facial recognition passwords on your phone or out of public facial recognition programs (stadium sign in or airport kiosk), you can minimize your risk.
Dude even if you don't post pictures of yourself online like Instagram or Facebook, etc. Places like LinkedIn still requires you to post a picture of yourself in order to boost your chances of landing or even just entering the interviewing stages for the job you want.
@@Marcus-gw4bb not sure why you would expect posting on LinkedIn being different or safer then facebook. if your not posting picture online you are not posting any on LinkedIn ether.
I have difficulty remembering people's names. This would be a great help, but I wouldn't want it to show me any information that the person had not already given me. This is an invasion of privacy.
But if any of this information is online it's public knowledge. So no invasion of privacy. I think people will begin to be more careful in what they say and post online now
@@JustTim1916 A lot of the time people don't even know what information of them is online. This reminds me of the black mirror episode where everyone had stats bruh.
@@JustTim1916he literally covers this in the video, it's not the information you yourself post on a public social media platform... It's scouring EVERYTHING that you likely don't know is out there.
Same, always thought a version of this would be awesome, BUT for the workplace where it's just name, job title, department... Just basic signed off information. This version is frankly terrifying.
@@dkmphotography_co_uk That'd be useful, for sure. But I'd like anyone's name provided I'd already been introduced. Perhaps there could be a sort of exchange of information like we used to do with cards.
Im sure there are tons you do not even know about. We are at the point where we cannot escape it. We are on surveillance cams as we move around, traffic cams, security cams in shops background of other pls pics & videos.
@@beewest5704 Yes but they wouldn't find my name. Because the only picture there is with my name is the one on my licence plate and those pictures are blurry. I had friends remove me from tagged pictures. So so far I won't be identified. I put my full name online and sure info comes out but no pictures associate me to those online entries. When I drive I always put on sunglasses so if a toll plaza takes my picture my glasses hide my face pretty well. That is as far as it will get
It's important to note that this is not just restricted to Meta's Ray-Ban glasses. Any camera worn by someone can do this. However the discreet placement of the camera is more relevant. Also there's so much AI generated music live streaming on TH-cam now. Check out all the relaxing lofi channels.
lol! Yes! I wanted to comment about the lofi channels too. I like this one called Home Alone. They make some nice jazzy stuff. Do you have any recommendations? Thanks in advance :)
Yeah. Some of this AI generated music is crazy. I just heard SMONIX's 70s version of Linkin Park's Thousand Suns, and it sounds ridiculously convincing.
A couple of points: It started with taking a picture (using glasses was an extra step). It also goes with how much information we deliberately reveal on the internet. Meta obviously has this feature created, it is just not ON. This kind of case study can show the readiness of the society. It may only be postponed, but it will become a trend anyway. Get ready.
In Russia they did it with Vkontakte 10 years ago.. Well, basically Yandex allowed for searching faces. It was the time when Google's image recognition was also much better. 😅
I am not wondering what that has to do with artificial intelligence, I am wondering how the hell a person's data is so readily available to some rando with a pinhole camera in his sunglasses
If you watched the video you would have known that the Video stream is fed to the computer to recognise the face. If the face is recognized, then all the publicly available information about that person is pulled from the internet and these information or url containing the informations are fed to large language model such as chtgpt to summarize the data which will help with instant communication with the victim.
Wtf? I think you are an a.i. bot or whatever. What does your comment even mean? You string a few words together that ultimately are void of any clear opinion. Talk about authoring chaos.... One thing for sure is the A.I. interference has become deadly. It rigged an election. And killed the trust Americans enjoyed for a long. Sorry to see it go. Oh well. It was fun while it lasted.
I like the last fact that the Ai was able to convince conspiracy theorists that they were wrong by (20%). But is that really a good sign? It shows that us humans can be convinced of something being right or wrong based on a conversation with a computer, but still with no lived experience or hard physical evidence. This shows that not only could people be convinced of things that are true by an AI machine but they could very likely be convinced of a lie just as easily!
@@goilo888I Lost my mother of General Cancer, 2 weeks after she took the VaÇčįŋė of Ĉővįđ. No Ai will come and convince me that the magic poison din't killed my mother 🖤💀🖤 I know MEDIA is there to protect Governments and Elite's NOTHING more!!!!!!!!!
I was looking for this comment... So manipulation is good (as long as it is for a good cause). Let's pretend that's ok... it still means the technology can be used for bad.
Basically its like the game Watch Dogs....but worse. This is why Google glass was banned. I'm in the cyber sec industry and this will be a nightmare since social engineering is 95% of breaches are due to social engineering.
It’s funny, the news reporter from the first bit said"imagine these glasses/power in the wrong hands" immediately bringing up connotations to criminality. Why do I hear the government rubbing their hands???
Rule of thumb .Anyone that you do not know tries to talk to you in the street ..Just ignore them as they are not up to anything good.If you do not know someone and they have no reason to talk to you.Then ask them if they know you .If you have no idea who they are then just politely tell them to get lost.There are exceptions of course like when someone picks up something you dropped or forgot etc but generally strangers when out and about are to be avoided..Be nice .Be polite but make sure you are safe
I remember listening to Michiu Kaku years ago saying this would be happening in the near future (facial recognition glasses that tell you someone's personal info). Glasses that do that will be commercially available soon enough. It is a security nightmare for people, and once again people's safety and privacy will be deliberately neglected by everyone with power and influence. The next stage of the Orwellian/ Kafka dystopia is right around the corner.
Meta just ruined Rayban for me ... And if I don't remember who you are, you knowing my name and address won't do more than what good manners implie anyway.
Im still tryna figure out what he did wrong. Be created the bots that made the music. Bo different than a producer using FL studio to make a track with presets. He didn't hack spotify or use streaming bots did he?
It's similar to a TH-camr creating a rain sound channel, and it generates views. The more views, the bigger the monetary payout. Well, he used AI to generate both the music and the views/ streams. He basically generated money without a mint. And he did it without giving the government their cut. That's the only crime. It's freaking genius, honestly...
Why was the second guy arrested. He created the music, he didn't steal it. He created game account, is that illegal? There are millions of fake accounts. What did he do that was illigal?
@@travelguy8431MAFIA creates LAW's to protect them self. illegal doesn't mean NOTHING today. Tones of Drugs pass borders each year, people work for 2$/day (Slaves), etc. This world is ALL corrupted!
Whoever paid for the ads is being defrauded because they expect the ads to be played to a potential consumer and not a robot. So he's defrauding the advertisers not spotify and the like. There's another version of this called click fraud.
I knew this was eventually coming back when police cars started deploying automatic number-plate recognition back in the 1990s. Shortly after we were warned with the Tom Cruise movie Minority Report, except that cameras don't need to scan retinas to identify someone.
if these kids did this, the gov already has been using it and much more advanced. they do this on a global database of all cameras. research it if u dont believe me
Facial recognition is vital for the blind. I am a Blind software engineer and I can tell you that technologies that do facial recognition are absolutely doable and can be made to minimize or eliminate privacy concerns.
Blind here. The issue lies in defining the boundary. This could lead to identifying people we don't know. Of course, my biggest dream is to recognize who's around me without needing them to speak.
If this were made for blind people I'd be for it. Let's regulate it so only blind people can use it. Same for driverless cars, great for blind people, unintended yet bad consequences for the rest of us.
There was a movie with Karen Smith (Amanda Seyfried) called Anon, where everyone could do this with either brain or ocular implants. Everything they looked at had a floating bubble next to them with their name, age, and other info. Everywhere you looked. It seemed pretty futuristic but it's already here. And just realize if it's now becoming available to the public, that means its been available for years already to people we know nothing about.
Im looking at the comments and none of you are getting the point of how dangerous this is... that woman had no clue who he was and just because he had real time info about her she felt comfortable enought to stand up and interact with him as if he was a friend...
Social engineering baby
gonna streamline Infiltration ops like never before
Lol any cellphone can do this without glasses .... The glasses are just a camera
@@marcosmoura911 Yeah but imagine point your phone camera in someone's nose and doing this lol. But point taken, you are right. If they take a picture from a distance, the same can be done if the quality of the photo is high enough for the AI to scan and process
yeah, this is getting seriously invasive !!! close your social media accounts !!!!
It is a good thing Meta made a statement that using their glasses in this way was a breach of the terms of service, Because criminals are well known for following the rules. 🙄
Yeah because they can do this themselves on the backend.
What’s good about it when it’s just a statement? People will still exploit that product just like Facebook’s negative impact in youths
@@shinjihirako4773but people will exploit any product they can nothing we can do about it
Good for security purposes.
@@shinjihirako4773they were being sarcastic
I am going to have to wear a paper bag over my head when I leave my house.
😂😂 I like this one.
@pas8469 you will definitely like this when the joke is over 😊
covid masks
It’s called a Burka
I ain't leaving my house anymore, lol
The glasses are not the problem. The problem is that your info is available with just a search of your face.
I'd say the glasses giving anyone access to ya information in an instant is the problem. It'd be way less of a problem if a person had to actually do all the work the glasses do to get ya information.
Well didn’t you just hear the guy say that even if you don’t purposefully put your info out there, people have their personal info leaked all the time.
And the glasses pull all that info so, yes the glasses are a problem.
@blueshoes5145 no, the problem is that your info is out there and getting leaked.
Selfie trend
@@selwynandrews7716 your phone can take pictures too. Any camera can take a picture of your face. The problem is that having a photo of your face gives away a lot of personal info
A stalker's dream. Potential assaults, I. D. theft etc. They should be sued.
You realize this technology can be used by any kind of device? All it needs is a picture, and if you're in public it is one hundred percent legal for anyone to just take a picture of you, go home, and run it through this AI. All the glasses do is streamline the process. Sueing or banning isn't the solution.
@RabidDisposition So by your logic if a person k*lls someone with a gun vs. poisoning them they are less culpable because shooting the victim is quicker? 🤦🏻 Make it make sense. Suing is a start to bring attention to how dangerous this is or do we wait until someone is harmed?
They should make assaults illegal.
@@funguseaterAIi see you didn't watch the video
@@thea_therian He's correct though. They're using information that is readily available to the public online. The source of the data is almost entirely from the person being identified. If you've never posted images of yourself associated with yourself online facial recognition will not find you regardless of the data breaches they mentioned. You fell for the fearmongering aspect of the story.
If only hackers knew they were 'breaching terms of service,' they’d surely start behaving better right away. Thank you, Meta, for protecting us with your 'terms of service'-which really only serve to protect you, not your users or the victims of those who hack your devices.
you know you can use any camera for this?
@@Nobody-Nowhereyeah but would you stand in front of someone pointing a camera right in your face that’s hooked up to a computer and engage in casual conversation like nothing is amiss?
You know this is how hackers get jobs right? They do this stuff to get attention and in return, a job offer. This has been a tactic for several decades. Remember Anonymous? Several of the most prominent members evaded prison by accepting jobs from the US gov't.
@@robotman5105😂
@@robotman5105 and what is stopping someone from making their own glasses with pinhole cameras? As mentioned the technology is already available, just that it is implemented into meta's glasses.
The tools for finding names, faces etc. is all opensource and online. I had a play with it myself and it is honestly quite scary. I found out about it 4 years ago, it is by no means "new" technology.
This is literally so dystopian and beyond unethical. This is so dangerous and unacceptable. How is it that ppl aren’t asking themselves at what point should we stop???
somebody shouldve asked that decades ago when facebook launched... its always been here
How is this dangerous?
Unfortunately we aren't in control. The tech czars are the ones running society.
This is allowed by government and corporations already, any corner you're on you're bring tracked, and now you're suddenly concerned about the next Zuckerberg? You're about 20 years too late when your parents voted for George Bush and trashed all of our privacy rights.
People did this to themselves. Stop using social media.
This takes danger of social engineering to completely new level.
You have to be No One. and i would advice everyone to never provide to anyone their personal info.
Few tips how to avoid personal information leaks:
- Your names should be always different on eveyr sistem, either asdadsasd or something else.
- Your address, that you type in forms, should end in parcel locker location orr Postal Office or at worst your street without shouse number or unit.
- You have to have 3-4 phone numbers.: 1 is personal or the people you trust or die for, 2nd is for people you know, 3rd one is for business or selling, 4th is for online internet.
- last advice is to go and remove every possible personal info or picture from the Internet, and from Business Institutions.
Great tool for aspiring TH-camrs who want to score fast, and become the next big TH-camr with Patreon and ad money revenue.
Woah... Correct..
Facial recognition in general from anybody should be banned and outlawed. It has already been shown to FALSELY charge the wrong people by getting confused.
Yeah, but, like ... that *mostly* only happens to people who aren't on the paler end of the spectrum, so can you *really* expect sillycon valley to worry about breaking a few eggs to make the omelette?
/s
These students just exposed what any security camera could already do. You should be grateful that they told you something that you should already have known.
People should really stop putting their private information online lmao.
@@Mad_Catter_ bruh i got a letter from the hospital, data breach your info may have been stolen. CC info, location, ailments, Height weight gender blood type swimmer count...
Oh my god, the company that reached 1.5 trillion on the stock market by deploying a mass surveillance system to force-feed people targeted advertising just released a pair of sunglasses with cameras that help expand the reach of their surveillance system! How could this happen??!
Peak sarcsm.😂👌
Such a worthless number.
@@mastermill79what sarcasm?
It’s almost inconceivable.
Best comment here. 🏆 👑 🥇 😎
The sad part about it is the inventor of these sophisticated glasses already knew this would happened
They might have already been doing that. These people just unlocked premium or Admin features
If this tech is in right hands not licensed for public use it's easy to catch criminals & decrease crime rate. But our history taught us true human nature. Things are always created & misused to destroy other humans.
These are ruling the world potential stuff
Because it's obvious, that people already put their personal info all over the internet and don't practice internet safety.
Idk how old you are, but when Instagram first used its GEO filter (people near you) someone used it in the EXACT same way. Found people using hashtags, their locations, and recently uploaded pictures. Back in the days of myspace, we were encouraged to lie about our names, sex, and location (A/S/L) but now people only post their A/S/Ls, but also what they're wearing, where they shop, their jogging routines, etc.
they only ported the FB tech equivalent in glasses, no breakthrough here, basic face recognition program
Because things like this already existed. It’s not new most governments use it. Isolating the face and scanning the eyes ONLY helped!
We need a new bill of rights - for everything privacy related.
That will not happen at all. over 40,000 vehicles from fedex alone have cameras in which law enforcement does not need warrants to access. the school buses. the drones. there is no privacy. them wanting to put finger print readers on not only vehicles but just anywhere. you gotta start wearing finger print protectors by 2027 for sure. your phone has a finger print reader smaller than a penny so imagine others using it to create a collection. and any stride you use to justify privacy most people will give it up in one sad story. all they need is a crying mother with a sad story for people to give up their rights voluntarily.
Yeah, the Bill of Rights works well in the United States. But what about the 300 plus countries around the world? Servers can be located anywhere
You mean a new amendment or law to combat this issue
Who don't you just stop uploading your info on the internet instead?
Stop sharing you private infos on your social media.
Especially posting people or their kids on social media
I am never leaving the house again. We need a law against this because this is frightening DANGEROUS
Yet you still keep your name and photo on this comment
@@CrabbinFever😂😂
It’s to late. You’re in the matrix just going to Walmart.
Hey women. This is something the goverment already invented. Also why are you using your full name and photo on social media if your scared about thi?.
1:20 Wait till y'all find out every traffic cam and public surveillance camera is ALREADY being used in this way.
Then why do cops need to id u during bogus traffic stops? Mmmm then leave me alone if they got all this
@@89volvowithlazers Because cops are the lowest level of law enforcement. They don't have super-computers at the local department.
@@89volvowithlazersbecause the tech isn’t perfect. Especially with black ppl. The ai has trouble seeing dark faces
Wait till you find out that nobody can understand why the gov doesn’t actually use the tech to stop crime lol
I highly doubt EVERY traffic cam and surveillance cam already uses this. But this technology is definitely being used by higher ups for certain things. E.g. It might be used near important buildings…presidential zones, big banks etc.
Nothing good comes out of Meta at the long run.... that company is a social problem
Should be shut down. simple as f.
It couldn't possibly be that people are terrible creatures and SM just reveals it.
@@obsidianjane4413you have a point as well. People are using technology that is meant for good and turning it into something bad. But it’s hard to want to blame the company who is only trying to take us to the future. That’s like trying to shut down all gun manufacturers because guns kill people when in actuality people kill people.
@@johnsmith9903 Guns are more dangerous. We should ban them too.
I mean Google did this 10 years ago, only now computers are faster, people are sharing more about themselves online but you can‘t really blame Meta for this, it was gonna happen anyways. Just like brain-computer iterfaces will happen, just a matter of time.
This is SUCH an invasion of privacy.
well you're the one who wants to go outside
You could just not post publicly accessible images of yourself on the internet, too
@@harmoney-tk5wd your neighbors amazon camera watches you when you leave the house
@@gregoryallen0001That was the stupidest response
@@harmoney-tk5wdthis was a close second
What a disgusting world it's become. This can't be an easy generation to grow up in. Sometimes I wish we could all go back to the payphone days
We could have, except they removed all the pay phones for some reason
Only if I was Caucasian!! ❤
Stfu white people are struggling too
The 90s with payphones, pagers, affordable rent, a slower pace of life and people who were not all unhinged
I prefer stone age😂
@1:55 They say that it's a "breech of their terms of 'service'" because they don't want to share the ability to look up people's information at any time.
This- is why I have zero online digital footprint, never have. No facebook, myspace,. anything- nothing. Ever.
Funny you just left a digital footprint.
The same AI that can convince someone a theory is wrong can convince someone a theory is true.
So what? It’s been that way for thousands of years since complex societies started forming. Ever hear of politicians?
@@mensrea1251 Agree. I was pointing out the dual nature of the experiment mentioned in the video, that the journalist seemed to think is bringing a betterment.
@@NorthernChimp agreed. "Good AI news"? It was the worst and only news. However it only managed to reduce peoples opinions by 20% not 20% of peoples opinions, thankfully.
@@NorthernChimpthis ain’t “ai”, it’s just a simple script any beginner coder could write.
It’s just a psych op
Omg. Black Mirror's "Nosedive" episode is starting to become real.
I'm going to watch that tonight.
@@Bee_Mavrick What do you thing? Did you like it?
@@etiennebrownlee4071 is that the episode where they have social points and everyone can see these informations?
That series is turning out into a dystopian reality and we're facing total cognitive dissonance.
It's called predictive programming.
I'm surprised no one expected this to happen. I'm sure it existed for the Gov't long before the students hacked Meta.
They've been upping the ante since "The War on 'Terror'". It's a farce
i recall seeing a cool AR demo concept video years ago kinda like cyberpunky the guy had glasses that did just that when looking at people and seeing what was missing in his fridge just looking at the fridge. etc
Money shut them up
People too stupid to have done their own research on potential in technology, when it comes out they suddenly get hysterical like the dots haven't been slowly connecting for years
We’ve already seen this in science fiction movies. Mission impossible anyone?
the bottomline is surveillance. If you want every single thing in your life to be under surveillance, life will become suffocating and you won't be able to pass as a good human. Everyone has some wrongdoing in their life and surveillance will get you for it. This is really bad. Expecting every single human to be 100% faultless is a disaster waiting to happen.
Greed has no end in view, nor does man’s ambitions.
they didn't *hack* it, they removed the blocks on what the tech could already do
Yessir
Hacking:
"The gaining of unauthorized access to data in a system or computer."
So kinda is exactly that?
That's hacking
I think some y’all missed the broader point here that the narrative puts blame on the students not the tech company.
so... they hacked it...
Hi France 24, they're not VR (Virtual Reality) glasses, they are AR glasses (Augmented Reality)
Thanks for the correction.
Don’t violate our terms of service so we can come out with that ‘feature’.
Exactly. MEDIA is only to protect governments and the Elite's. I'm more than sure they are preparing something Evil, with the excuse of Protecting populations, as Always done in history to destroy the low class. 🖤💀
But when the government does it, it's ok.
As a woman and for parents this is a terrifying tool that predators could use to manipulate children and stalk victims.
Okay and for men, it’s not a problem to get their privacy invaded?
Narcissist.
“Are you (some CHILD?) yeah your mom sent me to pick you up for (some even the child has posted about.)”
i mean, you can very easily do that without glasses
Plost twist: Personal experience.
XD
@@HeatherFoster-nk5vn Easy, maybe, this quickly? Hell no. This tech takes the normally highly methodical and premeditated crime of stalking and turns it into something one can do fully impulsively. Once someone with a particularly predatory mindset has the power of these glasses on their head and gets something like this set up they can just grab any random person off of the street and be neck deep into gaslighting them by the time you can make and complete just one google search, fully inconspicuously, all on a whim. That is *horrifyingly* dangerous.
I think you just answered your question. Read again.
The problem isn't the glasses, the problem is people posting photos of their underage children online
Restrictions on AI? What about severely punishing platforms (LIKE META) that request user private information and then lose it to these online databases (OR WILLINGLY SELL IT), this can all be done without the glasses, the glasses are merely a tool to make it more convinient but this isn't the core of the problem
Restrictions on AI definitely need to happen as well. It's been years since I first saw a humanoid model, and they already have more potential to cause more harm than any nuclear weapon.
This is misinformation, they clearly stated that they do AI it after taking a picture with a post program in a laptop you can do the same with your phone.
Meta's a funny company. They think something like a T&C agreement is going to stop someone from abusing their glasses... funny joke.
So... we should ban them? Do you want to ban guns too? Same thing.
And they damn well know no normal person is reading that. That's why they can get away with it..."well you know, they actually violated our T&C, so that's not on us".
@@obsidianjane4413 is this tool going to be detrimental to society in general?
@@luizcarvalho759 As opposed to any other?
@@obsidianjane4413 guns can be dangerous but at least you can say they can be used for self defense.. now please enlighten us on how this is the same thing
Who made this? What a freak, the fact that this was made, and then published, just gives too many people the knowledge or idea to do this, horrifying.
This is beyond concerning as a person and especially as a parent!
Delete your social photos, all of them, everywhere. It's how they find you.
Go back to 01:32 and watch again.
You can’t .
@@coreyyyyyyyy At that point they are referring to personal data breaches, not photos. If you have never been on social media or in the news online, then how would a face match be made? I do doubt deleting photos now would help though....
It’s too late to delete photos
Or not, if you're wearing glasses packed with infrared emitting LEDs to effectively blur your face from being captured in any cam device like those smart glasses.
This is why we can’t have nice things
There needs to be comprehensive legislation protecting people's privacy online. Unlike the bill passed by the GOP on May 2017 allowing the sale of anyone's browser history to anyone else.
Even if legislation is passed nothing will stop gvt agencies from using the technology to spy on you in the name of national security. Possibly they are doing it right now
unfortunately that will not happen
@@anywallsocket not with that attitude
@@anywallsocket they'll use AI to attempt to enforce any regulations. Oh gosh!
@@Grieche-i8y they’ll be companies that host services you can pay for to ‘protect’ you data, you just have to give it all to them and hope they won’t settle in court
Just something to consider: Today, whether you live in a small town of 700 people or a bustling city, it’s nearly impossible to go a mile without being captured on some form of CCTV or surveillance system. The truth is, we don’t know what businesses are doing with their footage, and much of it is likely scanned using image or facial recognition software.
If you don’t want to be recorded or have your face stored indefinitely, the only option is to stay indoors. Privacy, especially in public spaces, is essentially a thing of the past. Imagine being on holiday, taking photos or recording videos, and authorities demanding you delete your content because it captures other people.
While we can "vote with our dollars" by avoiding certain technologies, it won’t stop others from using them. The reality is, this trend isn't going away.
Facebook
Instagram
TikTok aka X
TH-cam
AND all places PEOPLE chose to put themselves and others online..
Attaching their phones numbers and emails..
*THIS WOULD NOT BE AN ISSUE*
If people didn’t live online..
I bet the security services are going to want a version of these glasses. They can profile you and look cool at the same time.
they already have most likely. using even more sophiticated software or even satelite.. just like the Chinese CCP do for surveiling everybody.
Maybe theres already a contract for them ongoing!
Where do you think they got the funding?
@@psychonaut689 Lol, Meta doesn't need Security Services money
I think the 4th amendment would block technology like this at a constitutional level.
“Unreasonable search and seizure (of data)” certainly comes to mind when someone can use smart-glasses to look at you and instantly know the names of your parents and where you’ve worked in the past.
Any evidence collected on individuals using these glasses would be inadmissible in court. They’re worthless for security services.
If a bunch of students can hack it, it's security must suck..
Or it’s just really smart students. First time I hear about this while the glasses have been out for almost 2 years now (we’re on the second version of these glasses)
Well they are harvard students ..
@@silvrsurfer Such insecure product already out for 2 years?.. 🤦♂
students are the most likely to hack it per capita, you want a bunch of seniors to give it a go?
Its not about security. “hacking” simply means tinkering, programming, developing. Common misconception.
Wait til the police uses this during protests.......
You mean CCTV footage?
Yeah cos they're not doing it already 😂😂😂😂😂
@@Ricardofromage I didn't realize you could hide one in a donut
@@GeoMeridium 😂😂😂😂
Wait? Lololol
This is beyond insane. This has to be stopped.
What is really shocking, is that people cry about those glasses, not even realising, that the same thing can be done with a smartphone, a tablet, or any digital camera and a computer.
So yes, like others pointed out, the glasses aren’t the problem. It’s online security and AI powered search capabilities.
The glass make that ubiquitous and available in real time, this is a new "playground" for stalkers, burglars, scammers etc.
@@lepotdefleur9906 These students created the software to search google real time. This software is not available to the public.
Reason 10,752 of why not to have any social media presence online.
We have no control over what friends and family post, info of you, pictures of you, etc.
Yup. No SM. Once I retire I will delete Linked In account, and probably stop this fake name YT ac. Time to move without digital noise.
It’s the same a google glass that came out in 2012 some time. People were freaked out about being recorded by people 24/7. Same difference.
There's a pretty big difference between a pair of glasses that simply takes pics, and one with ability to recognize everyone's faces, connect them with social media profiles, family members, addresses, phone numbers, SSN, etc, and then have an LLM summarize all of the details.
I always think of a breach of terms of service as a rather hollow defence. The moment I saw these existed, I could see them being used for many nefarious means - see that someone is out of their house with these glasses and then you get a friend to go to their home and break in - stalk someone, illicitly filming them without their permission - have someone hack glasses in a nearby area so that you can use all glasses in that area and have them as free hidden cameras in houses, changing rooms, bedrooms, etc. These things are a privacy nightmare!
I want these glasses man! I always forget people names
I find it amazing how the line between 'neat' and 'ruinous' is found so quickly once a new piece of technology is released, particularly when it has any tie to social media.
If scammers have their hands on these info, many will fall prey !!!
So basically you can stalk your victim now without putting in any much effort. Great job AI Devs.
As long as douchebags have access to AI, it will be our downfall. There is a reason why two security chiefs from “OpenAI” left the company.
Want to know something? The more you use AI the smarter it become
@@williamplaysrbx9972 that's a crazy fact
well the cat is out of the bag there is no as long we are past that. maybe we can delay a little bit the cutting edge stuff but won't be for long so many people went in AI during the c19 lockdowns its no longer a fringe domain.
To be fair in the US you don't get to assume privacy in public places. Meaning filming or taking pics is 100% legal.
Thanks France, our American media has been unsuprisingly quiet about this
02:30 "slightly terrifying".....I'm sorry what? This is Insanely worrying
You have to factor in that she is a news broadcaster reporting on an issue that is directly related to a multi-billion dollar corporation. She is likely contractually obligated to not inject her own biases. I'm not defending Meta or anything
😂
Change it so that it can recognize animals and give scientific names and general info. I would like to wear that while inside a jungle.
That's just a real life pokedex xD
just read a book lmao
would need a a long zoom lens for that.
It can already do that
And yes sound identification of birds, and why not plants too, and landmarks with maps..
If you don't post pictures online or use facial recognition passwords on your phone or out of public facial recognition programs (stadium sign in or airport kiosk), you can minimize your risk.
But you cannot eliminate them.
Dude even if you don't post pictures of yourself online like Instagram or Facebook, etc. Places like LinkedIn still requires you to post a picture of yourself in order to boost your chances of landing or even just entering the interviewing stages for the job you want.
Shut up.
@@Marcus-gw4bb not sure why you would expect posting on LinkedIn being different or safer then facebook. if your not posting picture online you are not posting any on LinkedIn ether.
If you took a picture for your government ID like drivers license or passport, it's out on the internet already
I have no problem with people knowing who I am. It is like wearing a name badge. Keeps people in line.
😂
At this point let’s just all go to mars and restart 😂😭😭
I have difficulty remembering people's names. This would be a great help, but I wouldn't want it to show me any information that the person had not already given me. This is an invasion of privacy.
But if any of this information is online it's public knowledge. So no invasion of privacy. I think people will begin to be more careful in what they say and post online now
@@JustTim1916 A lot of the time people don't even know what information of them is online. This reminds me of the black mirror episode where everyone had stats bruh.
@@JustTim1916he literally covers this in the video, it's not the information you yourself post on a public social media platform... It's scouring EVERYTHING that you likely don't know is out there.
Same, always thought a version of this would be awesome, BUT for the workplace where it's just name, job title, department... Just basic signed off information.
This version is frankly terrifying.
@@dkmphotography_co_uk That'd be useful, for sure. But I'd like anyone's name provided I'd already been introduced. Perhaps there could be a sort of exchange of information like we used to do with cards.
Good for these students, expose what this tech really is
kinda confuse about what tech exatly? it's a ai problem
@@hander__sai is tech. Its both.
Do the glasses come with that already? Mean if this takes pictures. I'm sure all u have to do is upload it to world wide Internet. .
Just one more reason not to trust people.
People are sick.
Human nature
Duh! No one seems terrified by this? This is worse than any dystopian end of the world movie could have ever predicted.
Literally every commenter is concerned about this.
ABUSE of information. When you're under surveillance, you are by default a prisoner.
This is why I never have my personal pictures uploaded online. ZERO!!!
Im sure there are tons you do not even know about. We are at the point where we cannot escape it. We are on surveillance cams as we move around, traffic cams, security cams in shops background of other pls pics & videos.
@@beewest5704 Yes but they wouldn't find my name. Because the only picture there is with my name is the one on my licence plate and those pictures are blurry. I had friends remove me from tagged pictures. So so far I won't be identified. I put my full name online and sure info comes out but no pictures associate me to those online entries. When I drive I always put on sunglasses so if a toll plaza takes my picture my glasses hide my face pretty well. That is as far as it will get
Complete strangers have put pictures of my offspring online, as well as myself, without our permission. They are legally allowed to do this....
2:19 - It's Augmented Reality glasses, not Virtual Reality ones.
It's important to note that this is not just restricted to Meta's Ray-Ban glasses. Any camera worn by someone can do this. However the discreet placement of the camera is more relevant.
Also there's so much AI generated music live streaming on TH-cam now. Check out all the relaxing lofi channels.
lol! Yes! I wanted to comment about the lofi channels too. I like this one called Home Alone. They make some nice jazzy stuff. Do you have any recommendations? Thanks in advance :)
Yeah. Some of this AI generated music is crazy. I just heard SMONIX's 70s version of Linkin Park's Thousand Suns, and it sounds ridiculously convincing.
As scary as this is, I'm very impressed college students have this level of enginuity.
A couple of points: It started with taking a picture (using glasses was an extra step). It also goes with how much information we deliberately reveal on the internet. Meta obviously has this feature created, it is just not ON. This kind of case study can show the readiness of the society. It may only be postponed, but it will become a trend anyway. Get ready.
Truly terrifying- and only one man caught so far having used it for years…
In Russia they did it with Vkontakte 10 years ago.. Well, basically Yandex allowed for searching faces. It was the time when Google's image recognition was also much better. 😅
I am not wondering what that has to do with artificial intelligence, I am wondering how the hell a person's data is so readily available to some rando with a pinhole camera in his sunglasses
That part
If you watched the video you would have known that the Video stream is fed to the computer to recognise the face. If the face is recognized, then all the publicly available information about that person is pulled from the internet and these information or url containing the informations are fed to large language model such as chtgpt to summarize the data which will help with instant communication with the victim.
@@sabinbajracharya3815 ok my reply is getting sense-rd for no reason
@@sabinbajracharya3815 I think we get how it’s possible, but why is our info so readily available?? That part is the disturbing part.
@@wanderlust0120 Did you mean “censored?” How?
This has been around for awhile, the glasses just is a cleaner format
child safety is nonexistent with those glasses, you can look at a child and find out where he or she may live. this is terrifying.
This is specifically why I never uploaded photos to social media of myself especially as I grew up.
We are cooked
Oh yeah, if you can't trust AI to tell us the truth, 5:57 who can you trust? 😂😂 GIVE ME A BREAK.
Unreal , literally
Wtf? I think you are an a.i. bot or whatever.
What does your comment even mean? You string a few words together that ultimately are void of any clear opinion. Talk about authoring chaos....
One thing for sure is the A.I. interference has become deadly.
It rigged an election. And killed the trust Americans enjoyed for a long. Sorry to see it go. Oh well. It was fun while it lasted.
They highlight the evil potential of AI then in the next bit state how it can be used to stop conspiracy theorists. What a crazy world
I like the last fact that the Ai was able to convince conspiracy theorists that they were wrong by (20%).
But is that really a good sign?
It shows that us humans can be convinced of something being right or wrong based on a conversation with a computer, but still with no lived experience or hard physical evidence. This shows that not only could people be convinced of things that are true by an AI machine but they could very likely be convinced of a lie just as easily!
Because instead of getting into a “No, you’re wrong” argument, the AI actually presents a lot of hard facts.
@@goilo888I Lost my mother of General Cancer, 2 weeks after she took the VaÇčįŋė of Ĉővįđ. No Ai will come and convince me that the magic poison din't killed my mother 🖤💀🖤 I know MEDIA is there to protect Governments and Elite's NOTHING more!!!!!!!!!
Fair point!
Hate to break it to you but that’s the way it’s been since complex societies started forming thousands of years ago.
I was looking for this comment... So manipulation is good (as long as it is for a good cause).
Let's pretend that's ok... it still means the technology can be used for bad.
This is scary! Imagine if a serial killer gets their hands on something like this? 😮
Meta should have known this would happen
Basically its like the game Watch Dogs....but worse. This is why Google glass was banned. I'm in the cyber sec industry and this will be a nightmare since social engineering is 95% of breaches are due to social engineering.
Government
Local law enforcement already does this
With glasses? Or what
It’s funny, the news reporter from the first bit said"imagine these glasses/power in the wrong hands" immediately bringing up connotations to criminality. Why do I hear the government rubbing their hands???
Gov has had this tech for a decade or longer. What they share with the public is always decades behind.
Rule of thumb .Anyone that you do not know tries to talk to you in the street ..Just ignore them as they are not up to anything good.If you do not know someone and they have no reason to talk to you.Then ask them if they know you .If you have no idea who they are then just politely tell them to get lost.There are exceptions of course like when someone picks up something you dropped or forgot etc but generally strangers when out and about are to be avoided..Be nice .Be polite but make sure you are safe
I remember listening to Michiu Kaku years ago saying this would be happening in the near future (facial recognition glasses that tell you someone's personal info). Glasses that do that will be commercially available soon enough. It is a security nightmare for people, and once again people's safety and privacy will be deliberately neglected by everyone with power and influence. The next stage of the Orwellian/ Kafka dystopia is right around the corner.
Can you imagine law enforcement with this technology?
Can you imagine ordinary citizens with this technology reacting to the law enforcement breaking our civil rights or commit police brutality?
False prophets will definitely get these glasses😂😂😂😂 business will be booming for them.
Now this should be pinned 😂. I see what you did there.
the glasses are not the problem, the system they build was
Regulation is imperative.
Security cameras have been doing this for a long time. If you’re in public there’s no expectation of privacy.
Meta just ruined Rayban for me ...
And if I don't remember who you are, you knowing my name and address won't do more than what good manners implie anyway.
@4:06 Basically his crimes are not paying enough taxes 😂. Forgot to pay Uncle Sam
Uncle Sam is a thief. He can chase me down in Africa if he wants his dirty blood money..
Im still tryna figure out what he did wrong. Be created the bots that made the music. Bo different than a producer using FL studio to make a track with presets.
He didn't hack spotify or use streaming bots did he?
@@limbeboy7exactly I was thinking the same thing, he created the content & listening to it also 😂😅
It's similar to a TH-camr creating a rain sound channel, and it generates views. The more views, the bigger the monetary payout. Well, he used AI to generate both the music and the views/ streams. He basically generated money without a mint. And he did it without giving the government their cut. That's the only crime. It's freaking genius, honestly...
@@breakaleg82 I agree.
Meanwhile, meta doing the same thing at a much bigger scale at backend😂😂
exactly
Why was the second guy arrested. He created the music, he didn't steal it. He created game account, is that illegal? There are millions of fake accounts. What did he do that was illigal?
Fraud I’d imagine is the law being broken
Probably the fake accounts to manipulate payouts
@@travelguy8431MAFIA creates LAW's to protect them self. illegal doesn't mean NOTHING today. Tones of Drugs pass borders each year, people work for 2$/day (Slaves), etc. This world is ALL corrupted!
Whoever paid for the ads is being defrauded because they expect the ads to be played to a potential consumer and not a robot. So he's defrauding the advertisers not spotify and the like. There's another version of this called click fraud.
Yes, I wanted to hear what the actual charges were.
I knew this was eventually coming back when police cars started deploying automatic number-plate recognition back in the 1990s. Shortly after we were warned with the Tom Cruise movie Minority Report, except that cameras don't need to scan retinas to identify someone.
if these kids did this, the gov already has been using it and much more advanced. they do this on a global database of all cameras. research it if u dont believe me
Facial recognition is vital for the blind. I am a Blind software engineer and I can tell you that technologies that do facial recognition are absolutely doable and can be made to minimize or eliminate privacy concerns.
Blind here. The issue lies in defining the boundary. This could lead to identifying people we don't know. Of course, my biggest dream is to recognize who's around me without needing them to speak.
If this were made for blind people I'd be for it. Let's regulate it so only blind people can use it. Same for driverless cars, great for blind people, unintended yet bad consequences for the rest of us.
Terminator tech is here
Masks will become a new need
And sunglasses. We basically became celebrity trying to hide from fans, if we care about our privacy.
No wonder people are giving me dirty looks for wearing my regular prescription Ray-Ban glasses.
There was a movie with Karen Smith (Amanda Seyfried) called Anon, where everyone could do this with either brain or ocular implants. Everything they looked at had a floating bubble next to them with their name, age, and other info. Everywhere you looked. It seemed pretty futuristic but it's already here. And just realize if it's now becoming available to the public, that means its been available for years already to people we know nothing about.