She is wrong about companies. Swedes have highest rate of start up companies, 1st place in world. We really do not just sit and wait for foreigner to come and start companies here. Main reason why so many Swedes start companies, is our safety-net, you can take a year off from your regular job get full paid during you start up, if your idea dont work out, you can go back your previous job. With very low/none risk to try and fail, more people try make own business.
Yep, that was the first thing i reacted to and im swedish. sounds like she was just performing a "Killgissning". Sweden has almost the most amount of big private companies in the world if you take the population into account.
Yes. The reason we "Rely on immigrants" is mostly on the lower income jobs or jobs that are not saught after, like elderly care, nursing, fast food delivery, fast food workers and so on. Sweden heavily encourages start ups since you can easily get grants from Arbetsförmedlingen for example.
What she says about creativity is very wrong. Not only do the Swedes have high amount of starters, but we are also highly creative and innovative people.
Few things has shocked me more then when I heard its considered to be poor if u bring homecooked food in a lunchbox. Then 90% of ppl ive worked with are poor including myself.
This video is an excellent illustration to many things that make a country prosperous. First of all, you see that the major role is the education system and the cultural indoctrination, which implants children (future adults) with qualities necessary for future life in a specific society. If you know what "the tragedy of the commons" is (and if you don't, you certainly should research and learn about it, for it's a key to many problems in human society, including problems of Brazil), you know, that the only way to reliably overcome the tragedy of the commons is to raise next generation of the members of the society in a way that allows them to trust each other and to overcome, through common understanding of the possible tragedies and trust in each other, the inevitable dangers of the commons. Those tragedies are overcome through self-limitation. Now, a bad actor can easily abuse that trust to improve his own lot at the count of others. Swedes are raised in a way that doesn't allow them to be those bad actors; but immigrants are not. Immigrants are much more likely to abuse the trust, because they are not accustomed to self-limitations, and that leads to the tragedy of the commons. Thus, people who see that their beloved society is in danger through tragedy of the commons try to protect it, the only way they know how to do it is to limit the number of bad actors, and the only way to do it is to limit immigration to the level where new immigrants can be reliably indoctrinated by values and controlled by surrounding society to prevent them from becoming the bad actors. Thus, the raise of racist parties - any antiimmigration parties would inevitably be racist, because they try to protect the country from immigration from incompatible cultures, and those cultures are usually far enough to consist of members of other races (for example, Germans are culturally enough compatible with Swedes so not to be a danger for Swedish society. But, say, a Brazilian likely isn't.) While I am not a member of such a party and not planning to become one, I certainly understand the reason for popularity of those parties; I do feel the need to protect my society, the appeal for limiting the immigration to a manageable level. The problem, of course, is that it is very hard to discern which level is manageable, and sensationalist media certainly likes to show the danger where there isn't.
I believe that an overwhelming part of our (yes I'm a Swede) problem comes from our media. I don't think that any media channel is perfect but the worst is founded by taxes. The ones allowed to speak doesn't know anything about anything while the knowledgeable part of the population is silenced. I don't mind being disproved (I love to learn and will even apologize if proven wrong) but repeating stuff that was an obvious lie 5000 years ago, isn't good enough. Someone said "Sweden will be Socialdemocratic 50 years after the party lose every seat in parliament because they control every part of the society". I agree.
the part about indoctrination is correct. they force the left politics into your head already from youth. they never let you think for yourself about right or wrong. and if you think this is wrong you are called a racist and you will never get a job and will be called criminal forever. sweden is a left fascist state and all you had watched is propaganda. propaganda for the agenda 2030 that no one wants. also there is one view from the cities and another from the countryside that hate the citizens but we are njot allowed to mention this. at the countryside we are tax paying slaves and the government do everything they possibly can to make us stay as such.
As another Scandinavian, I agree that there are many good things about life here. Unfortunately, this Swedish lady has a rosy picture of life. She does not understand why what she calls a racist party is growing. She does not see the problems that are created in a society where every opportunity is given to immigrants, and where some of them exploit without contributing, and even help to destroy the country that gave them a chance. Great reaction, as always.
I agree with you . What she calls a racist party are those who protest against immigrants who take advantage of our taxes. Commits crimes and has made many Swedes afraid to go out. Those who want to work and do right for themselves are warmly welcome to Sweden. We are NOT racists
For more than 25 years I have worked with express delivery of medication in the worst parts of Malmö and has hence meet loads of hostile people. I'm good at my job and I'm friendly. My experience is that feminists are the worst people. I can handle a group of 4 "new Swedes" and a group of 10 Caucasian youths but feminists are on another level (because they are indoctrinated to the level that they cause problems that will most likely get them injured). I once used the company key to enter a building and then called the elevator. Before it arrived, a 16-19 year old female entered with her key. We both sad hello and when the elevator arrived, I held the door for her (just as I would have done for everyone/anyone). She pulled the door shut when I was about to enter so i broke two fingers, but she continued to pull on the door. This was almost 20 years ago. I had the key, I had the company print all over my clothes and SHE APPROACHED ME. If a male of any color or belief had done such a thing, I would have acted in an EXTREMELY violent way. She likely though that her action was justified because she was indoctrinated. I didn't pursue her so she likely saw her action as beneficial.
Racist party????? Another one living in a bubble. No more videos of this woman. She´s free to think as she likes but to start speaking about it in a video for all to see, makes it political. And her thoughts are not everyone´s thoughts
@@MrHenrikAndersson The party she is referring to has about 20% of the seats in Sweden's parliament, while 80% choose other parties, i.e. 4 out of 5. The fact that about 50% of the parliament accepts them is not because they have the same views as them, but because they are dependent of them - without this party, the current government would not be in government. If any of these other 80% would have the same opinion as this party, they would also vote for this party, which in that case would have more than the current 20%. I belong to the other 80%, which is a higher number than your 20% - YOU are in the minority.
@@LasseEklof Obvious misrepresentation. SD and the center-right have enough in common to form a government. All polls show this, with only a 3% party being split on the cooperation. It would be like saying 70% of the Swedish people reject Social democracy, which is of course a lie, because they have allies just like the right does.
@@MrHenrikAndersson "SD and the center-right have enough in common to form a government" - SD is not in the government. Yes, SD has some common views like M and KD, but far from everything, and definitely not with L. M, KD and L were able to form a government thanks to SD, which is a support party outside the government. SD has about 20% which is actually 1 out of 5, the others M, KD, L, C, S, MP, V have around 80% which is 4 out of 5 (no matter how much you try to make SD bigger than they actually are). If more people thought the same as SD, more people would naturally vote for them - thus only 1 in 5 think like SD and also vote for them. Do you remember a number of years ago, when all of today's government parties said they did not want to cooperate with SD - Anna Kinberg Batra (M) tried to open the door and had to resign because of the storm she caused. Kristersson/Bush-Thor, on the other hand, are so hungry for power that they do whatever it takes to be able to form a government, even cooperate with SD. If they could form a government without SD as a supporting party, they would have done so.
I can see some people here complaining about the fact she called Swedish Democrats a racist party. So I am going to try and shed some light on this. SD is the Swedish Democrats. They call themselves Nationalist Social conservatives. They used to be closer to Nazis in the 90s, has slowly moved on to a more Neo-Nazi position and a position that speaks easier to a people that dont see themselves as racists. They have managed to blame every single issue that is currently happening to Sweden on immigration, while it is true that Sweden suffers because of immigration we still need it to survive and we need a government who takes in immigrants and makes sure they can be safely and quickly integrated into our society. This is not the Swedish Democrats idea, they often cover behind the idea that only criminal immigrants should be deported or that they are actually not immigration, but their speeches to the people talking about how they want to see a Europe without muslims says otherwise. They have, as the Nazis in the 40s when they blamed their issues on the jews, blamed their issues on the Muslims instead and they have managed to make some Swedes believe that hating muslims are in fact not a bad thing, but a good thing to "preserve the culture and blood line". Which is what the Nazis managed to do to their people. We are seeing a divide in Sweden thanks to immigration, but its mostly thanks to the Wests constant destabilization of the middle east and Africa that people are forced to flee from war or famine. And Sweden has because of this had the position that it is up to us to help as much as possible. During the war in Syria several european countries and middle eastern countries refused to take in refugees, so Sweden got the brunt force of it taking in hundreds of thousands. And thanks to our government not being able to handle it, a lot of immigrants live poor, has problems learning the language and finding work and so on which in turn causes crime to increase.
that it looks clean and neat is not 100%. the young people can be parked 10 meters from a rubbish bin, but throw the fast food packaging right outside the car. and if the bin is full, they put it next to it so the birds spread it out. makes me very angry when you get down to the marina.
She is wrong about companies. Swedes have highest rate of start up companies, 1st place in world.
We really do not just sit and wait for foreigner to come and start companies here.
Main reason why so many Swedes start companies, is our safety-net, you can take a year off from your regular job
get full paid during you start up, if your idea dont work out, you can go back your previous job.
With very low/none risk to try and fail, more people try make own business.
Yep, that was the first thing i reacted to and im swedish. sounds like she was just performing a "Killgissning".
Sweden has almost the most amount of big private companies in the world if you take the population into account.
Exactly! And us Swedes are knows for being innovative.
Well, we won't get fully paid, but in general I agree
Funny, I was just about to comment on the same thing.
Yes. The reason we "Rely on immigrants" is mostly on the lower income jobs or jobs that are not saught after, like elderly care, nursing, fast food delivery, fast food workers and so on.
Sweden heavily encourages start ups since you can easily get grants from Arbetsförmedlingen for example.
What she says about creativity is very wrong.
Not only do the Swedes have high amount of starters, but we are also highly creative and innovative people.
I agree, maybe she havn't noticed it living abroad for so long.
Sweden is a great country with wonderful people and one of the best civil societies in the world. The only drawback. 9 months of shit weather a year.
Few things has shocked me more then when I heard its considered to be poor if u bring homecooked food in a lunchbox. Then 90% of ppl ive worked with are poor including myself.
This video is an excellent illustration to many things that make a country prosperous. First of all, you see that the major role is the education system and the cultural indoctrination, which implants children (future adults) with qualities necessary for future life in a specific society. If you know what "the tragedy of the commons" is (and if you don't, you certainly should research and learn about it, for it's a key to many problems in human society, including problems of Brazil), you know, that the only way to reliably overcome the tragedy of the commons is to raise next generation of the members of the society in a way that allows them to trust each other and to overcome, through common understanding of the possible tragedies and trust in each other, the inevitable dangers of the commons. Those tragedies are overcome through self-limitation.
Now, a bad actor can easily abuse that trust to improve his own lot at the count of others. Swedes are raised in a way that doesn't allow them to be those bad actors; but immigrants are not. Immigrants are much more likely to abuse the trust, because they are not accustomed to self-limitations, and that leads to the tragedy of the commons. Thus, people who see that their beloved society is in danger through tragedy of the commons try to protect it, the only way they know how to do it is to limit the number of bad actors, and the only way to do it is to limit immigration to the level where new immigrants can be reliably indoctrinated by values and controlled by surrounding society to prevent them from becoming the bad actors. Thus, the raise of racist parties - any antiimmigration parties would inevitably be racist, because they try to protect the country from immigration from incompatible cultures, and those cultures are usually far enough to consist of members of other races (for example, Germans are culturally enough compatible with Swedes so not to be a danger for Swedish society. But, say, a Brazilian likely isn't.)
While I am not a member of such a party and not planning to become one, I certainly understand the reason for popularity of those parties; I do feel the need to protect my society, the appeal for limiting the immigration to a manageable level. The problem, of course, is that it is very hard to discern which level is manageable, and sensationalist media certainly likes to show the danger where there isn't.
I believe that an overwhelming part of our (yes I'm a Swede) problem comes from our media.
I don't think that any media channel is perfect but the worst is founded by taxes.
The ones allowed to speak doesn't know anything about anything while the knowledgeable part of the population is silenced.
I don't mind being disproved (I love to learn and will even apologize if proven wrong) but repeating stuff that was an obvious lie 5000 years ago, isn't good enough.
Someone said "Sweden will be Socialdemocratic 50 years after the party lose every seat in parliament because they control every part of the society". I agree.
the part about indoctrination is correct. they force the left politics into your head already from youth. they never let you think for yourself about right or wrong. and if you think this is wrong you are called a racist and you will never get a job and will be called criminal forever. sweden is a left fascist state and all you had watched is propaganda. propaganda for the agenda 2030 that no one wants. also there is one view from the cities and another from the countryside that hate the citizens but we are njot allowed to mention this. at the countryside we are tax paying slaves and the government do everything they possibly can to make us stay as such.
As another Scandinavian, I agree that there are many good things about life here. Unfortunately, this Swedish lady has a rosy picture of life. She does not understand why what she calls a racist party is growing. She does not see the problems that are created in a society where every opportunity is given to immigrants, and where some of them exploit without contributing, and even help to destroy the country that gave them a chance. Great reaction, as always.
I agree with you . What she calls a racist party are those who protest against immigrants who take advantage of our taxes. Commits crimes and has made many Swedes afraid to go out. Those who want to work and do right for themselves are warmly welcome to Sweden. We are NOT racists
For more than 25 years I have worked with express delivery of medication in the worst parts of Malmö and has hence meet loads of hostile people.
I'm good at my job and I'm friendly.
My experience is that feminists are the worst people. I can handle a group of 4 "new Swedes" and a group of 10 Caucasian youths but feminists are on another level (because they are indoctrinated to the level that they cause problems that will most likely get them injured).
I once used the company key to enter a building and then called the elevator. Before it arrived, a 16-19 year old female entered with her key. We both sad hello and when the elevator arrived, I held the door for her (just as I would have done for everyone/anyone). She pulled the door shut when I was about to enter so i broke two fingers, but she continued to pull on the door.
This was almost 20 years ago. I had the key, I had the company print all over my clothes and SHE APPROACHED ME. If a male of any color or belief had done such a thing, I would have acted in an EXTREMELY violent way.
She likely though that her action was justified because she was indoctrinated. I didn't pursue her so she likely saw her action as beneficial.
7:33 say this to a Swede and you'll be sorry.
A shitload of nonsense ofc...
Racist party????? Another one living in a bubble. No more videos of this woman. She´s free to think as she likes but to start speaking about it in a video for all to see, makes it political. And her thoughts are not everyone´s thoughts
You are right, her thoughts do not apply to all Swedes, but 4 out of 5.
@@LasseEklof Really? How come more than 50% of the parliament accept them. It is you who is in a minority my friend.
@@MrHenrikAndersson The party she is referring to has about 20% of the seats in Sweden's parliament, while 80% choose other parties, i.e. 4 out of 5. The fact that about 50% of the parliament accepts them is not because they have the same views as them, but because they are dependent of them - without this party, the current government would not be in government. If any of these other 80% would have the same opinion as this party, they would also vote for this party, which in that case would have more than the current 20%. I belong to the other 80%, which is a higher number than your 20% - YOU are in the minority.
@@LasseEklof Obvious misrepresentation. SD and the center-right have enough in common to form a government. All polls show this, with only a 3% party being split on the cooperation. It would be like saying 70% of the Swedish people reject Social democracy, which is of course a lie, because they have allies just like the right does.
@@MrHenrikAndersson "SD and the center-right have enough in common to form a government" - SD is not in the government. Yes, SD has some common views like M and KD, but far from everything, and definitely not with L. M, KD and L were able to form a government thanks to SD, which is a support party outside the government. SD has about 20% which is actually 1 out of 5, the others M, KD, L, C, S, MP, V have around 80% which is 4 out of 5 (no matter how much you try to make SD bigger than they actually are). If more people thought the same as SD, more people would naturally vote for them - thus only 1 in 5 think like SD and also vote for them. Do you remember a number of years ago, when all of today's government parties said they did not want to cooperate with SD - Anna Kinberg Batra (M) tried to open the door and had to resign because of the storm she caused. Kristersson/Bush-Thor, on the other hand, are so hungry for power that they do whatever it takes to be able to form a government, even cooperate with SD. If they could form a government without SD as a supporting party, they would have done so.
I can see some people here complaining about the fact she called Swedish Democrats a racist party. So I am going to try and shed some light on this.
SD is the Swedish Democrats. They call themselves Nationalist Social conservatives.
They used to be closer to Nazis in the 90s, has slowly moved on to a more Neo-Nazi position and a position that speaks easier to a people that dont see themselves as racists.
They have managed to blame every single issue that is currently happening to Sweden on immigration, while it is true that Sweden suffers because of immigration we still need it to survive and we need a government who takes in immigrants and makes sure they can be safely and quickly integrated into our society.
This is not the Swedish Democrats idea, they often cover behind the idea that only criminal immigrants should be deported or that they are actually not immigration, but their speeches to the people talking about how they want to see a Europe without muslims says otherwise.
They have, as the Nazis in the 40s when they blamed their issues on the jews, blamed their issues on the Muslims instead and they have managed to make some Swedes believe that hating muslims are in fact not a bad thing, but a good thing to "preserve the culture and blood line". Which is what the Nazis managed to do to their people.
We are seeing a divide in Sweden thanks to immigration, but its mostly thanks to the Wests constant destabilization of the middle east and Africa that people are forced to flee from war or famine. And Sweden has because of this had the position that it is up to us to help as much as possible. During the war in Syria several european countries and middle eastern countries refused to take in refugees, so Sweden got the brunt force of it taking in hundreds of thousands. And thanks to our government not being able to handle it, a lot of immigrants live poor, has problems learning the language and finding work and so on which in turn causes crime to increase.
Agree 💯👍
i am swedish and some is true not all
I'm from Sweden and 70% of what she is saying is wrong, cut the crap after @11:03.
Yes I agree
that it looks clean and neat is not 100%. the young people can be parked 10 meters from a rubbish bin, but throw the fast food packaging right outside the car. and if the bin is full, they put it next to it so the birds spread it out. makes me very angry when you get down to the marina.