The headline for this video on TH-cam asks "Did Jesus believe in Islam?" That was more than enough for me since Islam was not even an idea from Mohammed until 300 years after the resurrection of Jesus. So, how could Jesus believe in something that was a reality as yet?
Ancient people had a much different view of historicity and science compared to moderms. This video shows some ignorance understanding the inspired Holy Scriptures. It imposes the modern set on ancient writings. The symbolic is often the powerful lasting truth of God. God communicates to us in such fashion because that is how He designed our minds.Think Bk. of Revelation, Daniel, Communion , Jesus' parables ,Genesis etc. To impose the extremist "literal" interpretation can greatly distort much of the inspired bible. Salvation is in Christ alone NOT a particular interpretation of Genesis. It is not Christ plus a certain doctrine or view of Genesis. Christ is the Only perfect Word of God ,as our Saviour, our King and the perfect reflection of the Father's love. The Good News is ALL about the Kingdom of Christ and His love and sacrifice.. PTL
While I agree that the teachers you show here have it WAY wrong, I wish you would consider a two-population model that avoids their errors. I agree Genesis one is talking about Adam and Eve, but how does one know that it is ONLY talking about Adam and Eve when it says "male and female created He them"? What God says to humanity in chapter one sounds nothing like the interactions He has with Adam and Eve in chapter two. In Acts 17:26 there is no Greek document that says "one MAN". Most just say "from one". Those that say something say "from one blood". If the Holy Spirit had wanted to certify that Adam was the father of all humanity, this would have been the place to do it. Just put the word "man" in there. But it isn't there. Doesn't it raise a red flag when the word you are underlining to make your point is not really in the Greek? It is an assumption by a translator. That "one" is masculine doesn't mean much in a language where it is normal for words to have gender and one "ethnos" would make just as much sense as one man there. "From one ethnos He made every ethnos of men", and that would fit better with the few manuscripts which say "of one blood" anyway.
Welp if Jesus is yaweh then yea bc he’s the one who set this whole thing up so he could sacrifice himself for the very rules he made 🤷🏼♂️ makes no sense
![Chris Langan - The Interview THEY Didn't Want You To See - CTMU [Full Version; Timestamps]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/9miVG2xT5jY/mqdefault.jpg)
It's a story !
You know, like The Three Bears.
The baby bear had grandparents. The Forebears.
The headline for this video on TH-cam asks "Did Jesus believe in Islam?" That was more than enough for me since Islam was not even an idea from Mohammed until 300 years after the resurrection of Jesus. So, how could Jesus believe in something that was a reality as yet?
Ancient people had a much different view of historicity and science compared to moderms. This video shows some ignorance understanding the inspired Holy Scriptures. It imposes the modern set on ancient writings. The symbolic is often the powerful lasting truth of God. God communicates to us in such fashion because that is how He designed our minds.Think Bk. of Revelation, Daniel, Communion , Jesus' parables ,Genesis etc. To impose the extremist "literal" interpretation can greatly distort much of the inspired bible. Salvation is in Christ alone NOT a particular interpretation of Genesis. It is not Christ plus a certain doctrine or view of Genesis. Christ is the Only perfect Word of God ,as our Saviour, our King and the perfect reflection of the Father's love. The Good News is ALL about the Kingdom of Christ and His love and sacrifice.. PTL
While I agree that the teachers you show here have it WAY wrong, I wish you would consider a two-population model that avoids their errors. I agree Genesis one is talking about Adam and Eve, but how does one know that it is ONLY talking about Adam and Eve when it says "male and female created He them"? What God says to humanity in chapter one sounds nothing like the interactions He has with Adam and Eve in chapter two. In Acts 17:26 there is no Greek document that says "one MAN". Most just say "from one". Those that say something say "from one blood". If the Holy Spirit had wanted to certify that Adam was the father of all humanity, this would have been the place to do it. Just put the word "man" in there. But it isn't there. Doesn't it raise a red flag when the word you are underlining to make your point is not really in the Greek? It is an assumption by a translator. That "one" is masculine doesn't mean much in a language where it is normal for words to have gender and one "ethnos" would make just as much sense as one man there. "From one ethnos He made every ethnos of men", and that would fit better with the few manuscripts which say "of one blood" anyway.
Welp if Jesus is yaweh then yea bc he’s the one who set this whole thing up so he could sacrifice himself for the very rules he made 🤷🏼♂️ makes no sense