The Antonine Wall in Scotland (en)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 6 ก.ย. 2024
  • The Antonine Wall in Scotland is the northernmost frontier monument of the Roman Empire. In 2008 this archaeological monument became UNESCO World Heritage Site. This video was created 2007 within the framework of the European project "Frontiers of the Roman Empire" (Culture 2000 program). Author: Boundary Productions.

ความคิดเห็น • 44

  • @starkiss77
    @starkiss77 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Fascinating historical heritage. Funny 2000 years later and we can still view where the wall was. What will be left of us in 2000 years I wonder.

  • @JoeMama-vj8es
    @JoeMama-vj8es 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    That first curator really loves history, you can see it in his face. I was sorry to hear of his passing.

    • @ka-boom2083
      @ka-boom2083 ปีที่แล้ว

      He die? What name?

  • @LegioXXVV
    @LegioXXVV 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The Antonine Wall was never the Northern most Roman frontier in Britannia. That would be the Gask Ridge system combined with the Highland and Strathmore systems. They were in place over 60 years before the Antonine wall system.

  • @mrcool2457
    @mrcool2457 ปีที่แล้ว

    Fabulous.

  • @paulm749
    @paulm749 ปีที่แล้ว

    8:42 Let's not minimize the fact that Scotland would later become part of another great, world-spanning empire.

  • @CroakandCrow
    @CroakandCrow 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    04:06 a picture says a thousand words

  • @jbearmcdougall1646
    @jbearmcdougall1646 5 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I think you'll find Scotland wasn't part of the Roman empire... 25 years doesn't mean we were part of it...!!
    They came... They saw... The ran back...!

    • @johnmaclagan2263
      @johnmaclagan2263 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Stuart Donnelly The myth of Mons Graupias eh, the Romans were bawbags

    • @jbearmcdougall1646
      @jbearmcdougall1646 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Anyone can say what they like, have what ever theory the want...but the Fact is....it was safer for the slave loving Romans to build a wall and stand behind it... they did have trading posts in Ireland though. I've been to one north of Dublin..called Drumanagh ..theres a few others too. But Ireland had nothing of worth apart from slaves.

    • @laurahall2710
      @laurahall2710 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      They came, they saw, they ran back to their mammies

    • @sandraleiva1633
      @sandraleiva1633 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Your propaganda is hilarious.

  • @christostheocharides4689
    @christostheocharides4689 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Waste of money for Roman state i believe.

    • @MrChickenTV
      @MrChickenTV 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      The entirety of england never made a profit for rome

    • @laurahall2710
      @laurahall2710 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@MrChickenTV just a notch on Rome 's bedpost

  • @DavidFraser007
    @DavidFraser007 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Nope, Scotland wasn't part of the Roman Empire, a small part of Scotland was occupied for a short amount of time. It's quite obvious the Caledonians and the Pict were far too organised to allow that.

    • @rockyrakovica603
      @rockyrakovica603 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      No it was just non profitable to chase scots around that's why they stayed out in general

    • @DavidFraser007
      @DavidFraser007 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@rockyrakovica603 No, that's nonsense, the trade in slaves alone would have made it profitable. Pictland, which covers the east and north east Scotland was quite advanced in it's farming techniques, both in animal husbandry and crop growing. Gold mining was also taking place, just to the north of Antonines Wall. As I said, there was a well organised defence and it resulted in the Roman Empire being kept away.

  • @taggershine
    @taggershine 6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    oooo, wrong at the very end their honey. Scotland was never a part of the Roman Empire. They never took it, that's why Hadrian's wall existed and later, the Antonine "wall".

    • @chikenliken9897
      @chikenliken9897 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      George Morrison what actually happened was that the Romans conquered into Scotland and built the Antonine wall, but the Picts forced them to fall back and leave Scotland. They then built Hadrian’s wall, which was a lot more successful in its fortification.
      EDIT: I wrote this comment at 13 years old so sorry for the misinformation. The Antonine wall was built after hadrians wall however from what I remember the Romans only had really firm control over Britannia below hadrians wall

    • @jbearmcdougall1646
      @jbearmcdougall1646 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@chikenliken9897 25 years isn't anything more than an invasion..that they lost.!

    • @christostheocharides4689
      @christostheocharides4689 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@chikenliken9897 Antonine's wall was built after Handrians wall.

    • @punklockets1563
      @punklockets1563 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@christostheocharides4689 The Antonine wall was built after Hadrians wall. I live right next to The Antonine wall.

    • @christostheocharides4689
      @christostheocharides4689 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@punklockets1563 Thats literally what i said lmao

  • @nothingtospiffy1104
    @nothingtospiffy1104 8 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    glory to Rome!

    • @richardlongues4695
      @richardlongues4695 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Feck the romans !!

    • @richardlongues4695
      @richardlongues4695 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Glory to the Picts, the last of the free !!

    • @unknownw928
      @unknownw928 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Up the FIFERS use built the wall for a reason u shite bags

  • @theanimalkeaper
    @theanimalkeaper 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Cause us Scots were just a wee bit too much for the Romans

    • @sandraleiva1633
      @sandraleiva1633 ปีที่แล้ว

      That's not true. There wasn't anything worth getting north of the wall same as today.

    • @drrd4127
      @drrd4127 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@sandraleiva1633 Then why did they even bother going as far up as North Lanarkshire! Makes no sense! Why bother going that far up in the first place?

  • @scarmenl
    @scarmenl 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    And how many people were had their land stolen and were put off their land for the this boondoggle!?