Check out my Toolbox to quickly Add/Remove programs, configure power settings, and system updates with the click of a button. github.com/TheLinuxITGuy/Toolbox
MX Linux STILL has too many flaws but have not tried anything concerning the latest except it WONT boot just like the last 3 versions. #1 XFCE is for 32bit machines at best. We need MATE to be the Main DE. #2 need to be able to update to the latest version without it breaking. #3 Its freakin ugly....ugly logo an ugly name. Perhaps drop the word Linux and call it M X
I must be missing something. Why would anyone use a distro that looks like it was made in 1992? Like its just ugly as sin lets be completely honest. So why is this like always number one on distrowatch? I don't get it.
Yeah you are definitely missing something..you can always customize the looks if you don't like the default one. Moreover other than aesthetics, there are more than meets the eye with MX-Linux. Strong hardware support, usability and stability, Debian based --> things just work very well and I'm having a hard time trying to break MX-Linux.
I was using a computer in 1992 and this looks NOTHING like it, it's even more updated than desktops in 2000, just because it isn't your favorite does not mean it's bad.
XFCE is extremely custmizable to look however you want. Besides, you can change the DE yourself to the most modern or archaic looking one at any time, regardless of distro. Linux is what you make of it.
I mean, function over form my guy. Legendary Debian support and stability in an easier to use form, on top of having different desktop versions, and the ability to roll your own if the ones available don't suit. I'm using the KDE edition, and in just a few setting changes, I have it looking pretty sweet
Check out my Toolbox to quickly Add/Remove programs, configure power settings, and system updates with the click of a button. github.com/TheLinuxITGuy/Toolbox
after i closed toolbox , how to open it again?
@@egje39jong15 cd back into the folder and run Main.py again
I love this distro so much. This + Qtile is my dream setup
You should use 1080 resolution. Would be better for my eyes 😎
I should have zoomed in more.
They got MX to work on Ventoy now? I remember in the past I never could get it to boot properly when putting the ISO on a Ventoy stick. Cool.
MX has been supported since 2020/04/14 --- 1.0.05 Release.
Thanks for watching.
Clear and concise video. Great job. At 3:50 you can also right click on the update icon and select Check for updates.
Thanks! I use my Toolbox to update the system mainly.
MX still prefers sysinit over systemd? I do like systemd
mxlinux.org/wiki/system/systemd/
Default is sysinit. You can use boot option tool to change it to systemd.
Neofetch is dead.
Fastfetch is alive and shows more info
MX Linux STILL has too many flaws but have not tried anything concerning the latest except it WONT boot just like the last 3 versions.
#1 XFCE is for 32bit machines at best. We need MATE to be the Main DE.
#2 need to be able to update to the latest version without it breaking.
#3 Its freakin ugly....ugly logo an ugly name. Perhaps drop the word Linux and call it M X
I must be missing something. Why would anyone use a distro that looks like it was made in 1992? Like its just ugly as sin lets be completely honest. So why is this like always number one on distrowatch? I don't get it.
Yeah you are definitely missing something..you can always customize the looks if you don't like the default one.
Moreover other than aesthetics, there are more than meets the eye with MX-Linux. Strong hardware support, usability and stability, Debian based --> things just work very well and I'm having a hard time trying to break MX-Linux.
I like the look. 👀
I was using a computer in 1992 and this looks NOTHING like it, it's even more updated than desktops in 2000, just because it isn't your favorite does not mean it's bad.
XFCE is extremely custmizable to look however you want. Besides, you can change the DE yourself to the most modern or archaic looking one at any time, regardless of distro. Linux is what you make of it.
I mean, function over form my guy. Legendary Debian support and stability in an easier to use form, on top of having different desktop versions, and the ability to roll your own if the ones available don't suit. I'm using the KDE edition, and in just a few setting changes, I have it looking pretty sweet