If Kaspersky Endpoint Security had absolutely all protection components enabled (such as Adaptive Anomaly Control and others), detection of legal programs that can be used by attackers was enabled, and active infection treatment technology was enabled, the results would be much better.
Here's something that I've noticed with Eset in school: One of our teachers was trying to find a specific website to display on the Smart Board, but she ended up on a fake captcha website instead. She isn't very good with tech things, so she clicked allow notifications when she was asked to by the fake captcha, and then Eset showed up and said basically something along the lines of "Threat Detected: Adware", so it actually blocked it in the end, and I think that's why maybe some of those websites in your test would be blocked.
Kaspersky did extremely better even though Advanced Disinfection technology was disabled, with advanced disinfection enabled probably there would be nothing running in RAM.
Is the problem with northon and kaspersky not that they just quarantine something instead of fighting it? I heard that eset is actually fighting the program and correct it while norton and kaspersky have already the damage.
Scheduled tasks and java malware definitely on ESET Lot of PUPs on ESET Vm as well Games on Kaspersky😂 and malware remnants in appdata temp Startup items definitely more on ESET Conclusion: Kaspersky wins in my opinion bcoz Windows is not actively infected whereas ESET in my view seems actively infected.
I am not entirely confident about those second opinion scanners. All of them except Comodo are going to definitely perform worse than ESET and Kaspersky. I can bet on that😂
Overall the downside in ESET its not fast respond on malware test and frezzed and Kaspersky did bettter to even third party opinion scan more taking than ESET
Sir kindly for me test any kaspersky products to scane crack softwer such from file cr like Internet download manger, you really surprised kaspersky didn't detect any virus for these type of software while any 1 dollr AV detect as virus
If Kaspersky Endpoint Security had absolutely all protection components enabled (such as Adaptive Anomaly Control and others), detection of legal programs that can be used by attackers was enabled, and active infection treatment technology was enabled, the results would be much better.
Here's something that I've noticed with Eset in school: One of our teachers was trying to find a specific website to display on the Smart Board, but she ended up on a fake captcha website instead. She isn't very good with tech things, so she clicked allow notifications when she was asked to by the fake captcha, and then Eset showed up and said basically something along the lines of "Threat Detected: Adware", so it actually blocked it in the end, and I think that's why maybe some of those websites in your test would be blocked.
Kaspersky did extremely better even though Advanced Disinfection technology was disabled, with advanced disinfection enabled probably there would be nothing running in RAM.
Thank you for such interesting tests
Is the problem with northon and kaspersky not that they just quarantine something instead of fighting it? I heard that eset is actually fighting the program and correct it while norton and kaspersky have already the damage.
It could be depending on settings if disinfect or quarantine is selected but nice observation.
Scheduled tasks and java malware definitely on ESET
Lot of PUPs on ESET Vm as well
Games on Kaspersky😂 and malware remnants in appdata temp
Startup items definitely more on ESET
Conclusion: Kaspersky wins in my opinion bcoz Windows is not actively infected whereas ESET in my view seems actively infected.
I actually hear than kaspersky is normaly already infected even if it puts it into quarantine while eset should correct the infection back to normal.
@@12Burton24😂
Hi can you test sandboxie plus. I know it's not an antivirus, but testing sandbox could be a new topic
Sure i will go and have a log at these types of sandbox software
I am not entirely confident about those second opinion scanners.
All of them except Comodo are going to definitely perform worse than ESET and Kaspersky.
I can bet on that😂
Noice test overall
Will w8 for more tests
Kaspersky didn't detect any viruses in crack software it easily allow to use crack softwer
Where did your latest upload on checkpoint go?
It's still processing the HD quality and seems to take forever, once done i will post
@@jitechsolutions TH-cam's shitty algorithm
Overall the downside in ESET its not fast respond on malware test and frezzed and Kaspersky did bettter to even third party opinion scan more taking than ESET
Sir kindly for me test any kaspersky products to scane crack softwer such from file cr like Internet download manger, you really surprised kaspersky didn't detect any virus for these type of software while any 1 dollr AV detect as virus
Oki will see if i can add this to the tests
First!
You're right! 🍺
😊