A great conversation about where this all might go, although it does heavily reinforce that AI in AEC has barely left the stables at this point. Some products are emerging but they do very niche things or do a lot of things 'sort of'. Some of the model products are just proof of concept as far as I can tell (e.g. the 3D model creator looked suspiciously like a Forge model viewer - how would that output .pln for ArchiCAD?). I suspect a lot of things we see are ideas that often do not actually function yet. I'm yet to be convinced on the impact this will have just yet beyond glorified searching of difficult standards/systems and high level instructive/image outputs via chatGPT/image generation at this point. It will no doubt happen eventually, but I think we are further away from this happening than many are leading us to believe. The point RE lost/retired knowledge is a significant one, I'm unsure if burying it in products/black boxes will be the best approach.
People don't want to be left behind. And people including me feel nervous when we keep hearing something new EVERY SINGLE MORNING on youtube. And it's hard to try even one out at work. Because we are busy and it takes time for us to get used to it. In that perspective, he is like a light house at the moment. But I think ... eventually only few will survive I guess..
@@oleksandrkhabailiuk9224 in the case of most AI offerings, in learning datasets that will often not be open for access or review. The fact we think tools like chat gpt can replace our industry knowledge pool without bias or loss of quality concerns me, and I hear it often. We could have another autodesk on our hands depending which way this all goes, where you pay to play and access crucial data for delivery of base services.
A great conversation about where this all might go, although it does heavily reinforce that AI in AEC has barely left the stables at this point. Some products are emerging but they do very niche things or do a lot of things 'sort of'. Some of the model products are just proof of concept as far as I can tell (e.g. the 3D model creator looked suspiciously like a Forge model viewer - how would that output .pln for ArchiCAD?). I suspect a lot of things we see are ideas that often do not actually function yet.
I'm yet to be convinced on the impact this will have just yet beyond glorified searching of difficult standards/systems and high level instructive/image outputs via chatGPT/image generation at this point. It will no doubt happen eventually, but I think we are further away from this happening than many are leading us to believe.
The point RE lost/retired knowledge is a significant one, I'm unsure if burying it in products/black boxes will be the best approach.
People don't want to be left behind. And people including me feel nervous when we keep hearing something new EVERY SINGLE MORNING on youtube. And it's hard to try even one out at work. Because we are busy and it takes time for us to get used to it. In that perspective, he is like a light house at the moment. But I think ... eventually only few will survive I guess..
Where would you burying them?
@@oleksandrkhabailiuk9224 in the case of most AI offerings, in learning datasets that will often not be open for access or review. The fact we think tools like chat gpt can replace our industry knowledge pool without bias or loss of quality concerns me, and I hear it often. We could have another autodesk on our hands depending which way this all goes, where you pay to play and access crucial data for delivery of base services.
Architecture quality does not vary wether using a pencil or ai - creation is totally on a different level and will never be technical mainly
Thanks from CANADA
Listening from Nigeria!
People who watched this video, did you find anything useful for structural engineers?
from somalia sir-
♥
Nathaniel from Ghana