I like to equate it to the colour spectrum. We all know that green is green and blue is blue, but there is no one wavelength where it stops being green and starts being blue.
or languages. i speak portuguese, so do my parents, and so will my kids. but many generations ago, everyone spoke latin. we can distinguish portuguese from latin, but there were no latin-speaking parents who had portuguese-speaking kids.
The problem is that we communicate using words, and we don't want to overcomplicate our conversations. So, some degree of simplification is necessary in order to be able to use words at all, leading to confusion in the mind of some people.
Well... And when did eggs develop? Edit: im pretty sure i was responding to a guy who said that egg was first cuz egg existed unchanged before chicken did but i dont see the coment here anymore so..
@@besmart There is also browser extension that turns shorts into regular YT videos. Because damn the shorts are terrible format. At least I wouldn't even watch them if I didn't have the browser plugin.
Actually there was. Our fossile record proves that WE as humans all of a sudden just popped into existence out of no where, and that´s the fact we can´t expalin. It´s a hard one..
Bro I thought there was nothing controversial with the video. I mean it’s obvious, evolution is a slow process. It’s very rare for us to pinpoint exactly when a species evolved. These are usually single called organisms. For more complex animals, changes just gradually occur until at some point, we can no longer call it the same species it was before. Certainly biology classes need to be redone because people have the wrong conception of evolution.
I like to explain this by comparing it to how we age. When we compare ourselves one day to the next, or one week to the next, we see no difference. But if we compare ourselves when we were 10 to when we were 20 or 40, we will see the difference
@@znation1491 technically, no. The only reason why we are the same, is because we think so. Chemically and biologically, a 2 yo, 20 yo and 60 yo are different organisms and their bodies even work differently.
Except you can make a distinction at some point with non continuous sets. Species have distinct points asking the spectrum (each individual is a new point). So yes you could select a single point and call it human
What I find extra funny about this analogy is that I remember my brother and I would disagree about the color of trans-neon-green Lego pieces. I was convinced they were Green but my brother was certain they were yellow. (mind you this was back before online lego resources like bricklink so we didnt know the official name) Everybody sees color differently. Endless discussion!
ADAM WAS THE FIRST MAN HUMANS THROUGHOUT HISTORY SINCE THE DAWN IF TIME HAVE SAID THIS AND THERE ARE WITNESSES AND EVIDENCE AND TO THIS DAY 70% HUMANS BELIEVE ADAM WAS THE FIRST MAN DENY THIS AND YOU DENY ALL WINTNISSESS AND PROOFS AND MOST OF HUMANITY AND TIME ITSELF.
It's like if you have a short hair and you let your hair grow, there is no first day with long hair. The hair looks (almost) the exact same after a day but when you look at your hair in different months you can notice drastic changes.
Yeah but your hair is still hair. It doesn’t change in anything but length. In any case, even with the Color spectrum as an example, Color’s are our perception and the names we give them based on what we see. I think that evolution differs in that we can determine stages based on speciation, or specifically: how many generations or mutations it takes for two estranged groups with the same origin to no longer be able to reproduce with one another. There has to be a certain point where the dna is no longer compatible and I would speculate that is when the first of a new species arises.
@@Typical.Anomaly I think you've just proven the theory to be correct, because you're acting like a monkey right about now. Listen to intellectuals next time instead of going "blah blah" to their face like come kind of vampire.
Actually he made us laugh. I love hearing a good fairytale. Especially one about the earth magically creating itself and humans evolving from fish mutants. I needed this laugh and I thank you and the other Darwinist below you. 🐠
@@BrockGarrett-y8odespite your incredulity, there is actual evidence to support that we did, in fact, evolve from fish. In 2008, University of Chicago professor Neil Shubin wrote a book entitled, Your Inner Fish, which discussed human anatomy and embryonic development that specifically resulted from our time spent as fish. Also, I must say nobody asserts that the earth "magically created itself" other than creationists who strawman arguments that contradict their beliefs. You say we, the atheists are the ones who believe in fairytales. Don't you find it ironic that you believe a man and woman were created out of dust and deceived by a talking serpent into eating a magic apple that then brought evil into the world, despite the fact that there is no evidence for that?
It's like age. You weren't a child and then suddenly you were an adult. You didn't suddenly go from adult to elderly. It's a gradual change we can't see, but we can easily categorise
no that analogy doesn't work here, the concept of biological evolution is pseudoscientific and lack experimental evidence, they are digging things from the ground then compiling suggestions about it, and from chemical perspective and statistical one too this evolution is very very very unlikely to get one correct functional protein with specific structure by abiotic synthesis takes billions of years from a probabilistic point of view ,so when you take a whole organism that's another whole dilemma, changes can happen within species through several mechanisms like genetic crossing over and transposable genes but to diverge to another species by mutations that's also very unlikely because the genetic program is pretty much holistic which is not the appropriate term but the most close to what is in reality , a drastic mutation in the genome is very likely lethal for an organism, the viable ones can't change too much in the genetic program to produce a whole new specie, so the probabilities are very slim and the scientific method is pretty much altered in this theory
@@disinfect777There isn't a a day where puberty starts.Your hormone levels begin to increase way before you start to show any physical signals that you are entering puberty. Is not like you go to sleep and the next day you wake up with a mustache hair on your parts and acne on your face 😅
It’s similar to a paradox I once heard but can’t recall. What is the minimum number of grains of sand to make a hill. For the sake of the analogy let’s say it’s 1000000 grains for sand. But if you remove one is it still a hill? Of course, but at what point is it no longer a hill.
It’s like asking when does a child become an adult. Of course for the law it’s on the 18th birthday, but we all know it’s a gradual process and you can never pinpoint the moment a child became an adult.
members of a species are a group of organisms capable of interbreeding and producing fertile offspring. Different species typically have distinct physical characteristics, behaviors, and genetic makeup, which can set them apart. The inability to successfully reproduce with members of a different species often leads to reproductive isolation, reinforcing the separation between species. Other factors like ecological niche, geography, and evolutionary history can also contribute to defining one species from another.
@@mayurdahiwale5907 very similar, or nearly-identical, for the flip book example. I guess in some high page count flipbooks, there might be identical sequential pages if the artist is creating a "pause" in the action, but in flipbooks I've made and seen from others, each page is gradually different, ie NOT identical "identical" is a very specific term, and if offspring were identical to parents (no mutations or varying gene expression), then evolution would never happen Identical means exactly the same. Identical from one to the next in a sequence means ZERO change. Maybe an improper example here, but one might say that 2.001 and integer 2 are very similar, but not identical. In math for instance, the equal sign = means identical, while the wavy bars mean approximately equal, or similar (I can't find that math symbol on my phone)
@@mayurdahiwale5907 I don't mean to disagree with your premise because you make a good analogy with the slow gradual change of a flip book between sequential pages versus comparing pages that are far apart. I just felt the need to nitpick about the specific use of one word. Lol I agree with your analogy By the way what is Vsauce?
Actually, I think its more the science teacher trying to teach the woke ideologues that seem to think we were dropped off here by aliens. They don't believe that humans have a nature. They believe that everything is socially constructed. They deny that the very essence of who they are was blessed to them by millions of years of evolution, ergo, they deny reality, no different than a religion, because "woke" IS a religion.
I find it hard to believe in that with the lack of the stages of evolutionary bones. Even his explanation doesn't make sense as there should be some sort of little changes in bone structure as evolution took place.
@@gregoryhancock8605literally says in the video that a species only looks different when you compare two distant generations and that for example a parent and a child would be virtually identical because the differences are gradual and only apparent after a certain amount of time
Really, just took a DNA test and mine was a newt. Further down the link great grandpa ape saw a pretty Neanderthal abs the rest was history. It's all in the DNA. 😊
@witheringleaves5431 nope! Humans are always evolving, among the things we will lose from evolution will include things like toes and beards. We just won't be alive to see it but we are always evolving and will always continue to, even though you can't see it. Cheers!
@witheringleaves5431 our design isn't anatomically perfect therefore our body will evolve whenever it's an benefit on what ever we do constantly like the some native people in my country they have 50% larger spleens because every day they go hunting in the water for 1 to 2 minutes multiple times a day Or people who lives in low density air they have better breathing being I think without 40% out of 100 of air
@witheringleaves5431Well no, evolution is still happening. I'm assuming the commenter just meant we're going to go extinct sometime soon due to our killing of the planet.
I took Philosophy of Biology during my undergrad and the professor hated my “it is what it is until it isn’t” approach to defining species. That’s how I knew he was more of a philosopher than a biologist.
okay what is a cat lion also cat right. stray cat and lion have %95 common dna and also have different sound box, longer(lion) and shorter(pet cat) skull. now look human and chimpanzze they have %98,7 common dna. same amount hair in same amount area. similar instict, charcteristic and organs, same amount bone etc. so if lion is a cat and have common ancestor. must be logically humans and chimps also have common ancestor.
@@sharlena-jc5zw its false information. yes we have similar gene with plants approximately %35 - %45 percent. animal and plant common ancestor live 1.5 billion years ago. we share same gene with spider approximately %65 - %70 percent and common ancestor live 500 million years ago. some creatures have short life cycle and quickly jump generaton. example rat. they live 2 years and made many babies. this make them geneticlay more diverse and quickly change dna. even rat closer to us by common ancestor. we have %90 similar dna with dogs, only %88 similar dna with rat. similar thing apear some plants and other animals.
If you are human and you came from a human couple and each generation before were less people then if you keep going back there will be a first pair of human, the original first human couple.
i left youtube for a few years, now its just full of stupid. the algorithm shows me garbage and comments on interesting videos are deluded. wtf happened
Evolution is a well-established scientific theory supported by a vast body of evidence from various fields such as paleontology, genetics, molecular biology, and comparative anatomy. Some of the key evidence includes: 1. Fossil Record: The fossil record shows a clear progression of life forms over time, with simpler organisms found in older rock layers and more complex ones in younger layers. 2. Homologous Structures: Similarities in the structures of different species suggest a common ancestry. For example, the bone structure of vertebrate limbs (like the arm of a human, the wing of a bird, or the flipper of a whale) shares the same basic arrangement. 3. Comparative Anatomy: Comparative studies of different species' anatomies reveal similarities and differences that align with their evolutionary relationships. 4. Molecular Biology: DNA and genetic studies show patterns of shared genes and molecular sequences among different species, providing strong evidence for common ancestry. 5. Artificial Selection: The process of selective breeding, as demonstrated in domesticated animals and plants, mimics natural selection and leads to observable changes in species over generations. 6. Transitional Fossils: Fossils that exhibit characteristics of both older and more recent species provide evidence for gradual changes over time. 7. Biogeography: The geographical distribution of species aligns with evolutionary predictions, suggesting that organisms evolved in specific regions and then migrated to other areas. 8. Convergent Evolution: Unrelated species in similar environments can develop similar traits due to similar selective pressures, indicating the role of natural selection in shaping adaptations. The overwhelming convergence of evidence from these diverse fields supports the reality of evolution as a fundamental process shaping the diversity of life on Earth over millions of years. It is essential to recognize that evolution is a scientific theory backed by evidence and not merely a hypothesis or speculation.
But many weren't small but big strokes. And certainly not just at random. I believe in evolution but the idea that our ancestors was another species is a specuation very similar or course but not the same Growth wise.
Yeah, I've seen so much creators and videos forcefully trying to make that loop clean and they always suck so much 😂 I've seen like 1 or 2 tops that actually achieve it
@@extxvlogsMost of them will not get paid for this, if you think this is not good enough, so please at least appreciate their time and energy to make this content
@@zephyr.8850 who told you I didn't appreciate the whole thing? Who told you I base my whole judgment, praise and critic of their content on just how poorly executed and planned their loop mechanics are? Because I'm for hell sure I didn't say that on my first comment, if you have the mentality of never criticizing anything, good for you, but don't expect others to never point out faults and expect improvements. Those things are minor and inconsecuential, that's why I made light of it, but it seems that even that is way past the moral and human line that shouldn't be crossed! 🙄 I really like this an other's channel content and when I do, I make sure to let them know, so please, for a second, get off your high and mighty horse.
@@extxvlogsI was just saying it's important to respect their efforts. And Calling other people's work sucks is totally not a criticism, And I'm sure anyone else reading your 1st comment thinks the same thing
@@zephyr.8850 You are telling to appreciate his efforts. Efforts for what? For teaching us nonsense like there's NO first human and our ancestors were FISH.
You're not a laptop though. Besides a laptop is designed with all the perfect pieces in place. And if you're absolutely convinced humans are a great design then realize how dumb it'd be for a car's exhaust pipe to be the same place where you add oil and gas
Fun fact: Our greatest grandfathers were stars. Many of the heavy elements in the universe were created in the cores of stars or when neutron stars collided.
@@lolxd1434takes a star to form planets. By sheer luck, we got a mix of all the elements, at the perfect distance, with perfect temperature, and perfect tilt, and boom elements create us all
I notice things changing day to day but I suppose others aren't cursed to be as observant and self aware as I am, but I stay humble towards my abilities for the pain it brings me despite enlightenment. Sorry for the ramble, hope you have a nice day
@@shwet218 my original comment was half joking since I don't actually view it as enlightenment and just thought it'd be funny to act cartoonishly pretentious. But yeah I do have add, ocd & dysmorphia, ptsd and I've had a couple psychological evaluations and the doctors couldn't tell if I have autism or if it's just anxiety symptoms causing similar symptoms. Anywayz thanks for listening, Shweta
It’s like growing out your hair you don’t wake up one day and your hair is drastically longer. But when you compare two pictures months apart you see a drastic change.
@@Besotted85 I assume you accept microevolution. How can you not wrap your head around the fact that macroevolution is just microevolution on a larger scale?
@@Besotted85 …. Brother, you are lost in the sauce. They don’t change to a different ‘kind.’ Adaptation and microevolution are not the same thing. It’s like you’re looking at evolution backwards. The common ancestors of two different species usually possess the traits of both species. Given enough time those adaptations add up, making them speciate. It’s really that simple. You are drawing an imaginary line between microevolution and macroevolution. Everyone that genuinely understands evolution knows that is just flat-out foolish.
It's very similar to the "sorites paradox" that Micheal talked about in his video "Do chairs exist?" He talked about when does a chair stops becoming a chair if we remove very little parts by scratching enough times
@@josephsanchez5697 Cool quote son but it's not from Freddy Numbchucks, it's actually a quote from Steven Seagal back in the late 1990's when he was playing professional football on the side.
take a picture of your child from age 2 on everyday. You’ll never notice a difference from day to day, but someday they become a full grown adult and only by comparing different years can you see the change.
there must be a creator that knows that theres a sperm must reach an egg , the sperm wont ever know that theres an egg to go to ,never knew that theres a certain PH in the womb or before it, never knew that they must be in a huge nomber, Every male and female depends on each other to exist ,so they must be existed at the same time ,with the same suitable functionality,to manage to reproduce and last .. Any disorder or a difference in any complicated functionality of both of them ,they will just die.
For me, it is like getting older. Every morning you look in the mirror and see exactly the same person. Then, one morning you wake up on your 74th birthday…. Wondering why all the people around you seem to have aged so much
there must be a creator that knows that theres a sperm must reach an egg , the sperm wont ever know that theres an egg to go to ,never knew that theres a certain PH in the womb or before it, never knew that they must be in a huge nomber, Every male and female depends on each other to exist ,so they must be existed at the same time ,with the same suitable functionality,to manage to reproduce and last .. Any disorder or a difference in any complicated functionality of both of them ,they will just die.
I wanted to add that the first human was created by God when he breathed in a soul into Adam, but my grandfather 185 million generations ago was a fish
just like how in the color spectrum, if u look up very very closely, every color is very identical to the one next to it and to the ones that follow..u won't be able to say "oh, theres the change now"..
Sorry! Every color IS NOT very like the others. Red is vastly different from green. Black is vastly different from white. The only sameness is that they are colors! Such desperation to discount the need for a creator ____that takes a lot of faith...no facts. Just like the NEED for the evolutionsts' declaration that microevolution and macroevolution are one and the same. There is YOUR need within such a faith but no facts. Before trying to contest the reality that I just pointed out, consult ANY definitional resources. Simply take a little bit of time to look up words with micro and macro as prefixal assignments.
@@gregoryholden3255 bro whatttt in the dictionary u just wrote..when have a i ever compared a red to a very far away color in the spectrum, a green to it? yo take a break from the weed or whatever u smoking
@@OtherPeople159 Well, I stand corrected! However, you are the one who compared colors to evolution. But no matter how hard you try ,red doesn't evolve into a white. No more than a dinosaur evolved into a bird. Yet , the Archaeopteryx is SUPPOSEDLY proof of such a thing! And the land animals ____Pakicetus ____they evolved into whales, according to YOUR persuasion. Man, I'm sorry. But that actually is funny.And you seem to wonder what I'm smoking. Well, I could be smoking that algae that came from the water and became trees! Evolution says that it happened ____algae became trees. If you don't find that ridiculous, there is no such word as ridiculous. But back to what I'm smoking, I think I smoked that kind of algae that had not completely "EVOLVED!" I should learn to wait the required billions of years. Damn.😁
There's a point in time where we might decide "that thing has enough traits I recognize it as a human" but you might also recognize that it has traits you don't carry and vice versa. It gets even trickier when you question what we use to determine humanity. If we go by level of mental function then that's just dangerous, it has a high risk of diminishing the personhood of those who are mentally impaired, either due to genetics, injuries, or underprivileged backgrounds. Most of what we consider unique to humanity (written/spoken language, invention) we can also find missing in people born today, varying levels of illiteracy, nonverbal behavior, or lack of problem solving skills. Yet we recognize them as human, or at least anyone worth listening to does
Well we could define something by the development of a species in terms of general characteristics even if, within the species, there are mutations or different morphs, etc. What, then, would define the species was WHEN the species came to have a collection of traits, such as intelligence, which may have first culminated in a single individual. Although we might agree that criteria formation may be somewhat subjective or contextual.
Someone compared it to languages. There is no way to tell exactly when Latin turned into Spanish. No point in time where you'd say "your parents speak Latin, but you speak Spanish" it's all about those small changes adding up over time.
Russian logic. I owned Alaska a long time ago. Now I want it back. Putin: I want it my way. Media: Tell me more. Tell me more. Putin: A long time a go there was Tsar. He was caught in a jam. Media: Umm. Ha Putin: He was late paying his finance! Media: Tell me more. Tell me more. Putin: He didn't have the funds to build his palace. Media: Umm.. Was he drunk or just down on his luck? Putin: He went to his father but didn't have a buck. Barrowed from his bro. Couldn't pay him back. Media: Umm... ha. What did he do to pay him back? Putin: One day he heard a knock. It was Uncle Sam. He offered to buy si really cheap land. Media: Then what? Putin: Then he sold them Akaska. Now I want it back!
@@Sam-og1xd"ape and monkey the same thing" Monkey is a broader term. Apes are monkeys, humans are apes so humans are technically monkeys, but monkeys aren't apes. Apes never have tails.
this is also a good point against evelution since if they were constantly evolving only by a little then that means that everyone had to evolve at the same time so they could keep breeding and there would have to be enough people evolving at the same time to keep breeding
Fortunately this thing called genetics exist. So traits spread within a population. This isn't a point against evolution. It's just that you forgot about a very basic concept in reproduction.
you said that weird but i think your saying when one person gets a trait their offspring will carry it which is true but since its a mutation then only a small amount of their off spring will carry it. so when you look at apes the most possible way for them to turn into humans is one becomes slightly more human and all of their features also slightly change including there reproduction system then they have to find another ape in their lifetime that also has that mutation because otherwise they couldn't breed then they have to have 2 children both with that mutation and then they breed have children and the cycle repeats and doesn't break for a couple hundred years. Now there is a chance another ape gets the mutation but that doesn't matter and doesn't really change much unless your gonna say hundreds of a[e got born with a specific mutation and bred with each other. then that whole process happens hundred of thousands of times apes have slightly changed. And that is my ted talk thank you
@@SilverEye91 i understand that but both parents need it because there reproductive system would have changed have you seen the video with like the snail that spirals left and not right. Well he needs another left spinning snail to reproduce because it’s organs are different
@@GrandBaconBrother For the reproductive system to change that much you would need a really, really, really long time. That's a change that happens slowly over a population. Did you watch the video? Because you clearly missed the point.
The fact that we are related to both cats and trees should let you know that the concept of common ancestor is not at all related to ancestry and is actually just proof that all living beings are created in likeness and therefore share similarities which DO NOT necessarily indicate that they are related. When have you ever seen a species of animal mix with a human biologically? Or a human tree hybrid? Though we share half our dna with bananas we are neither able to evolve nor devolve into bananas, we are completely seperate beings which are incapable of mixing. Our similarity in DNA is just that, a similarity. Not even the top scientist in the top labs can mimic the “evolution” from one species to another not even in a lab but people will blindly believe anything.
I like to imagine the evolutionary progress like growing grass. You look at it for seconds, minutes, hours and you don't see it changing at all, but it did, it's just such a small change that you didn't even notice. You will notice the change if you come back to check maybe in a week.
@Tovalokodoncthe video is rediculas and so is the concept of course there HAS to be a point where one species became the next because ITS A NEW SPECIES just cause you cant tell the difference doesnt cange the obivious fact
@@Jamesishappygradual change is the key. There is no point where a bloodline changes species or genetics completely. To see a different species is to compare with far away cousins or far away ancestors. Don't say it's ridiculus just because you don't understand what he explained.
@@Jamesishappyif you take it literally it is ridiculous, which would be ridiculous to do so. He refers to the fact that the change was never too big. The difference between one generation and the next would be extremely unnoticeable, like having the nose 1milimeter shorter or stuff like that. It's not that hard to get the point.
It's a product of people in many of our societies being trained to think the world and everything in and around it fits in to neat, clearly separate boxes and that nothing is a gradient.
It’s also comparable to growing and ageing. There wasn’t a day where you woke up a toddler after having been a baby, a day where you woke up to being an adolescent after being a child, or a day where you woke up an adult. Or a day where you woke up ‘old’. It all happens so gradually. There’s no way to pinpoint an exact time.
@@zzzzzzhhhhh678 😄😅😂 yes! When I heard this analogy a while ago from an interview of evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins it also resonated with me. It helped me understand the gradual transition from one species to the next.
Wait I still don’t understand. Is this video stating that monkey, chicken, and human all come from the same ancestor? I hope someone could clarify for me. Thank you
😆lol there's no gradual change even over millions of years , that's a belief,a mythology without an evidence. In science, there's mutations causes illnesses, disorders and disfunctionality. Even so , the creature will die before even creating a single function ,before even finding the same changed creature with the same changes but a female in the same area and the acceptance to reproduce,or they will just die with their changes😂 🤓Growing for humans and animals prove also the parents wont accept the changed child and it wont last.. so every created period of the creature from the sperm to the growing baby ,wont accept the changes🤣
The only problem is this analogy probably doesn't apply to humans. The theory is the fusion of chromosome 2 happened over a single generation, and that possibly resulted in higher cognitive capability. Either way going from 48 to 46 chromosomes, is a substantial enough change you could consider the new off spring a different species. So there probably is a first human at that point in particular
there is no proof for blind evolution and many miniscule differences leading to new organisms or new organs. this atheist claim that has never been proven, but widely believed because of atheist brainwashing people from kindergarden. for any significant organism to survive it need to have all the necessary parts for its survival. an organism with half of an organ can not survive
I like to think it this way : If it's raining in one city and not in the neighbouring one, then there is not exact location where the rain abruptly ends
I love how he specified 185 *MILLION* years between current humanity's relation with fish and all you heard was... Humans related to fish, evolution man dumb I not fish I person🗿
YES! Our gills magically turned to lungs, we sprouted legs, and began our journey as Fishuman!! What great amount of faith it takes to believe in a process that started, hmmm, Idk, 400 million years ago!
@@SilverEye91 It wouldn’t be considered a “miracle” or “magic” for the cold-blooded to somehow morph into warm-blooded mammals over millions of years? Name one example of a change in kind that is observable…. Just name one… you can’t. If one subscribes to the evolution of the universe / living organisms, your worldview ultimately collapses. No meaning, no purpose-just randomness. No objective truth, no objective morality, no objective purpose. Christ is KING.
@@SilverEye91 Evolution is for people who think they are smarter than the One who created them. The Lord God gave us His Word-including the creation narrative. The natural man cannot understand the things of the Spirit, they are foolishness to him. (1 Corinthians 2:14) “Let no one deceive himself. If anyone among you thinks that he is wise in this age, let him become a fool that he may become wise.” [1 Corinthians 3:18] If One trusts in Christ for their salvation, they must also trust in His Word.
Which came first, the chicken or the egg? The egg, because if you go back enough generations there was a time when they weren't chickens, but they were still laying eggs.
The Chicken came first. I had this debate in university. If evolution is correct, the predecessor to the chicken would have evolved to be a chicken. Which would have mated and laid eggs.
@@Ivory-f5bthey call us fools for believing we came from fish (which, in of itself is a gross oversimplification) but they themselves think that a more righteous, or more feasible explanation is that they came from two humans created by a divine entity who got decieved by an evil snake and got kicked out of lalaland
@@ronaljitningthoukhongjam8325 I’m not sure I’m understanding you correctly. Are you saying that modern chicken eggs appeared and have no traceable origin to any chicken ancestors? Because that’s blatantly false lol. You may be confusing the part about how we don’t know when the first amniotic eggs came to be, because that amniotic layer cannot be fossilized, but that’s a completely different idea altogether, and occurred millions of years before chickens or their direct modern ancestors began to appear.
@@ronaljitningthoukhongjam8325 could you back that claim up with any sources? I’ve been googling trying to find what you’re talking about, and cannot come up with anything remotely close to what you’re talking about… What bird was “confirmed” to be early wild chickens with entirely different shell composition? I can’t even find discussions about shell composition at this point lol. Basically, this is information I am not seeing anywhere except from you, so if you know what it is or what you’re referencing, I’d love to take a look at it, because I currently don’t believe you, but I’m certainly interested in being educated if I’m wrong and/or don’t have access to the correct information!
Can you imagine being the "first" zebra? _First zebra:_ "Uh, hey guys what's up?" _Proto-zebras:_ "oh God, it's Stripey, he's gonna get us all killed, standing out like that..." 😮💨
@@Cookie_85 unless it was rapid evolution like what happened in Hawaii with the crickets becoming silent after a parasite fly started laying it's eggs in the noisy ones.
Whatever atheist. Last example was bs the video starts when you first start spitting nonsense out of your mouth. Btw evolution is not a fact it's a theory. Read science peasants jobless youtubers these days thinks they are over smart.
I enjoyed this short and it makes a good point, although it is not strictly true in all cases. It applies to most animals, including humans. But some plants, and even a few animals, have undergone a form of "instant speciation" called polyploidy where the number of chromosomes increases in a single generation, such that parent and offspring can no longer interbreed.
my grandfather 185 million generations ago had to swim across a sea to go to school
Aren't schools underwater?
Didn't he swim in a school ?
Its a school of fish.
And had to swim against the current both ways
Uphill both ways!!!
I like to equate it to the colour spectrum. We all know that green is green and blue is blue, but there is no one wavelength where it stops being green and starts being blue.
Or the question "Is Friday a weekend?" The closer you get to 11:59PM, the more the answer is "yes," but it's fuzzy between 12:00AM and 11:59PM.
or languages. i speak portuguese, so do my parents, and so will my kids.
but many generations ago, everyone spoke latin. we can distinguish portuguese from latin, but there were no latin-speaking parents who had portuguese-speaking kids.
The problem is that we communicate using words, and we don't want to overcomplicate our conversations.
So, some degree of simplification is necessary in order to be able to use words at all, leading to confusion in the mind of some people.
@@cfgp Pois é
It's called cyan
“I’m human, so are my parents” all right pal, sounds like something a lizard would say
He started that by saying "like"
@@cafe-tomateso your grandparent were like lizards 😂
True, they are among us😂
@@andyz7711 no I was pointing out how absurd and insane reply was “like”
hahahahahahahs
This is the answer to the chicken and the egg question.
Well... And when did eggs develop?
Edit: im pretty sure i was responding to a guy who said that egg was first cuz egg existed unchanged before chicken did but i dont see the coment here anymore so..
@@JasonUrOf course it's related Jason...
@@sallys.silver392 evolution
@@BlueCanaryNightLight ? Elaborate
The egg came first.
My grandpa 180million years ago crawled out the water and now I have to work for the rest of my life 💀
Literally every living creature has to work if it wants to live
lol
My grandpa 180 million years ago crawled out of the water and now I have to contemplate the meaning of life 💀
@@steze439yeah but do they pay taxes?
@Elle... no they usually fight to the death on a daily basis
jokes on you, there's a bar at the bottom of the video on desktop showing me exactly when the end of the video is!
and it doesn't loop, unless i tell it to !
Touché 😂
@@besmart There is also browser extension that turns shorts into regular YT videos.
Because damn the shorts are terrible format. At least I wouldn't even watch them if I didn't have the browser plugin.
Also on mobile though?
@@daa3930 I need that plugin, what's that?
Ok, there was no first human, but there must have been a first human who started to pay taxes.
Yeah its called the first human to be extorted
Adam is the first human
Its probably some guy in Mesopotamia.
@@Adventurin_hobbitwho is that 😂
@@aahhhhhhhhhhhhhyour dad
its just us humans wanting to organise everything into neat little categories
Mark Zuckerberg be like " see you guys, I'm technically human"
sure... ☠️
He’s the reason the uncanny valley became a thing 💀
So, if i eat fish then i am a cannabil 😮😮
He may be technically a human, but he was never biologically a human
Yep nothing unsual to see here
Dont worry guys, He's talking about his side of the family
true hahahaaah
Beautiful
He is talking about Humans but not donkeys (No offense just responding similarly to the 1st comment)
😂😂
😂
"MY LEG!" - My ancestor, 185 million years ago.
🤣
Full circle
"My back"- tobey Maguire
*185 million generations, not years
You mean, your waddlers.
-His great grandchildren
Actually there was. Our fossile record proves that WE as humans all of a sudden just popped into existence out of no where, and that´s the fact we can´t expalin. It´s a hard one..
The fossil records do not prove that at all.
No it doesby
i knew diving into this comment section would feel like fully covering myself with lava
frfr💀💀
True
Bro I thought there was nothing controversial with the video. I mean it’s obvious, evolution is a slow process. It’s very rare for us to pinpoint exactly when a species evolved. These are usually single called organisms. For more complex animals, changes just gradually occur until at some point, we can no longer call it the same species it was before. Certainly biology classes need to be redone because people have the wrong conception of evolution.
We didn't evolved from fish we were created by the god
@@DavidHereokhaa... How powerful a human imagination is yeah?
Bro called me a fish in 32 different languages
You mean in one language?
@@saltyfish7626lol
@@motherisape I actually don't get it. Why 32 languages? I feel like I am missing a joke.☠️
@@saltyfish7626he just wanted to do the trendy “Bro did something” to be cool post but didn’t think it through
That is stupid. No kne has ever wornessed a soxies turninh into another, and there is no evidence of any in the fossil records.
Honestly I hate my grandfather from 185 million yrs ago for being able to walk on land now I’m over here paying taxes
Corny
You could just evade tho...
😂
"Honestly"
In sea they work too but we don’t know how they worked 😂
So that means their journey to school was 199,999,998, harder than my grandparents’s
bro just called my greatest grandfather a fish
Our greatest grandfather
I will apologize when the fish start to walk.
So swim around for a few minutes, eat a plankton or two and deal with it - the way your greatest grandfather would.
Our greatest grandfather was actually just some bacteria
He talking about hes family. Our father its adam عليه السلام
You sir.. are a fish
-Arthur Morgan
Replying to this comment so it gets more attention, because it deserves it
“You Don’t Get To Live A Bad Life And Have Good Things Happen To You”
@@thatsupachamp8590 just be loyal to wat matters
“Ah it’s a toy boat!”
*"You're a fish" -John Marston*
I like to explain this by comparing it to how we age. When we compare ourselves one day to the next, or one week to the next, we see no difference. But if we compare ourselves when we were 10 to when we were 20 or 40, we will see the difference
Hmmm, and you are still the same person. Just drastically changed
I like this thought
@@znation1491 technically, no. The only reason why we are the same, is because we think so. Chemically and biologically, a 2 yo, 20 yo and 60 yo are different organisms and their bodies even work differently.
So when did I get old...
@@znation1491I am in no meaningful way the same person as the baby that became me.
the way i always think about it is, that evolution isnt two hairy apes giving birth to a human but to a hairy ape with one less hair.
"I'm human, so are my parents" - is exactly what someone who wasn't human would say...😏
Its also someone who IS human would say.
@@EricXia-k5bnaaa a lot of the people in my highschool just called their parents racist or absent 😂
Actually only a human can "say". Ridiculous.
😂
That reminded me of that one clip of mark Zuckerberg being like "I was human, I am human....still" 😂😂
Analogy: take a gradient that goes from yellow to green, and try to mark the exact point where it stops being yellow and becomes green.
Except you can make a distinction at some point with non continuous sets. Species have distinct points asking the spectrum (each individual is a new point). So yes you could select a single point and call it human
I’m colour blind! Help!
@@avengers363403 you can select a point, but that point isn’t real, these categories are constructed
I personally think that it is a great analogy, and when I thought that this guy’s opinion is non factual, u kinda cleared it for me, cheers!😁👌
What I find extra funny about this analogy is that I remember my brother and I would disagree about the color of trans-neon-green Lego pieces. I was convinced they were Green but my brother was certain they were yellow. (mind you this was back before online lego resources like bricklink so we didnt know the official name) Everybody sees color differently. Endless discussion!
As far as my memory serves me, my greatest grandfather was an amino acid.
ADAM WAS THE FIRST MAN HUMANS THROUGHOUT HISTORY SINCE THE DAWN IF TIME HAVE SAID THIS AND THERE ARE WITNESSES AND EVIDENCE AND TO THIS DAY 70% HUMANS BELIEVE ADAM WAS THE FIRST MAN
DENY THIS AND YOU DENY ALL WINTNISSESS AND PROOFS AND MOST OF HUMANITY AND TIME ITSELF.
@@KREEZY. How can you say facts when you don't know that for sure yourself?
💀
@@KREEZY.How you know thats a fact? You a friend of his?
@@KREEZY. Yeah, religion implies that we are all products of incest
“When i was your age son i had to swim to school”💀
It's like if you have a short hair and you let your hair grow, there is no first day with long hair. The hair looks (almost) the exact same after a day but when you look at your hair in different months you can notice drastic changes.
I agree, great analogy.
Yeah but your hair is still hair. It doesn’t change in anything but length. In any case, even with the Color spectrum as an example, Color’s are our perception and the names we give them based on what we see. I think that evolution differs in that we can determine stages based on speciation, or specifically: how many generations or mutations it takes for two estranged groups with the same origin to no longer be able to reproduce with one another. There has to be a certain point where the dna is no longer compatible and I would speculate that is when the first of a new species arises.
@@MahmoudS But blah blah blah... it's a good analogy.
@@Typical.Anomaly I think you've just proven the theory to be correct, because you're acting like a monkey right about now. Listen to intellectuals next time instead of going "blah blah" to their face like come kind of vampire.
What about when men shave and next day they got the 5pm shadow hair? You can literally see your hair grow bro
I'd like to claim the Atlantic ocean as my Great great grandpa's property.
😂😂😂😂😂
You mean Our
@@internet-gangsta2162 Bro you take the Pacific ocean.
Good luck on that 😂
@@randomed404 I'll take the Pacific and Arctic,do we have a deal?
"Just like you cant tell when this video starts and ends....."
The red line at the bottom of the short: Ima end this man's whole career.
You can learn a lot about evolution from the red line
Sometimes it doesn’t show up though.
Short pause at the end of the short: "Allow me to introduce myself :)...."
My memory:
💀💀
Ok so I’m a fish? Yeah right. I’m swimming out of this joint. *BLUB BLUB BLUB*
"Don't cry, I am just a fish"
~Grandfather 185 million generations ago probably
Im only a fish afterall, dont put the blame one me
now this shits about to kick off this fishy looks wack lets take back to straight fishhop and start it from scratch
There's no such thing as a fish
185 million generation not years
@@suryanshawasthi1815 thank you
this man made all religious people mad in an instant
I mean being a staunch evolutionist requires stupid amounts of religious blindness lol
@@thegreatsoutherntrendkill272I love irony
Actually he made us laugh. I love hearing a good fairytale. Especially one about the earth magically creating itself and humans evolving from fish mutants. I needed this laugh and I thank you and the other Darwinist below you. 🐠
@@BrockGarrett-y8odespite your incredulity, there is actual evidence to support that we did, in fact, evolve from fish. In 2008, University of Chicago professor Neil Shubin wrote a book entitled, Your Inner Fish, which discussed human anatomy and embryonic development that specifically resulted from our time spent as fish. Also, I must say nobody asserts that the earth "magically created itself" other than creationists who strawman arguments that contradict their beliefs. You say we, the atheists are the ones who believe in fairytales. Don't you find it ironic that you believe a man and woman were created out of dust and deceived by a talking serpent into eating a magic apple that then brought evil into the world, despite the fact that there is no evidence for that?
I’m not religious and I was a little ticked by the “actually, I was there” attitude he exhibits
It's like age. You weren't a child and then suddenly you were an adult. You didn't suddenly go from adult to elderly. It's a gradual change we can't see, but we can easily categorise
no that analogy doesn't work here, the concept of biological evolution is pseudoscientific and lack experimental evidence, they are digging things from the ground then compiling suggestions about it, and from chemical perspective and statistical one too this evolution is very very very unlikely to get one correct functional protein with specific structure by abiotic synthesis takes billions of years from a probabilistic point of view ,so when you take a whole organism that's another whole dilemma, changes can happen within species through several mechanisms like genetic crossing over and transposable genes but to diverge to another species by mutations that's also very unlikely because the genetic program is pretty much holistic which is not the appropriate term but the most close to what is in reality , a drastic mutation in the genome is very likely lethal for an organism, the viable ones can't change too much in the genetic program to produce a whole new specie, so the probabilities are very slim and the scientific method is pretty much altered in this theory
Well legally you do go from child to adult in 1 day.
@@bretert which is absurd, but legally, it is good enough.
@@bretert Biologically you go from child to adult over night as well. The day you start puberty is when you biologically enter adulthood.
@@disinfect777There isn't a a day where puberty starts.Your hormone levels begin to increase way before you start to show any physical signals that you are entering puberty. Is not like you go to sleep and the next day you wake up with a mustache hair on your parts and acne on your face 😅
It’s similar to a paradox I once heard but can’t recall. What is the minimum number of grains of sand to make a hill. For the sake of the analogy let’s say it’s 1000000 grains for sand. But if you remove one is it still a hill? Of course, but at what point is it no longer a hill.
It’s like asking when does a child become an adult. Of course for the law it’s on the 18th birthday, but we all know it’s a gradual process and you can never pinpoint the moment a child became an adult.
At the age of forty.
members of a species are a group of organisms capable of interbreeding and producing fertile offspring. Different species typically have distinct physical characteristics, behaviors, and genetic makeup, which can set them apart. The inability to successfully reproduce with members of a different species often leads to reproductive isolation, reinforcing the separation between species. Other factors like ecological niche, geography, and evolutionary history can also contribute to defining one species from another.
It varies from place to place and also what you are talking about. For example people can't purchase alcohol legally until they are 21.
"-So, to answer your question officer, yes she was old enou-"
i now understand
Its like a flipbook, where two sequential pages are identical, but distant pages are different
Identical is not the correct word here
@@bfboobie so what do you suggest
@@mayurdahiwale5907 very similar, or nearly-identical, for the flip book example. I guess in some high page count flipbooks, there might be identical sequential pages if the artist is creating a "pause" in the action, but in flipbooks I've made and seen from others, each page is gradually different, ie NOT identical
"identical" is a very specific term, and if offspring were identical to parents (no mutations or varying gene expression), then evolution would never happen
Identical means exactly the same. Identical from one to the next in a sequence means ZERO change.
Maybe an improper example here, but one might say that 2.001 and integer 2 are very similar, but not identical. In math for instance, the equal sign = means identical, while the wavy bars mean approximately equal, or similar (I can't find that math symbol on my phone)
@@bfboobie okay, you have a point. Accepted. Btw i feel this similar vs identical etc case can be more elaborately explained by VSauce 😅
@@mayurdahiwale5907 I don't mean to disagree with your premise because you make a good analogy with the slow gradual change of a flip book between sequential pages versus comparing pages that are far apart. I just felt the need to nitpick about the specific use of one word. Lol
I agree with your analogy
By the way what is Vsauce?
The science teacher trying to explain to the religion teacher about evolution be like :
Actually, I think its more the science teacher trying to teach the woke ideologues that seem to think we were dropped off here by aliens. They don't believe that humans have a nature. They believe that everything is socially constructed. They deny that the very essence of who they are was blessed to them by millions of years of evolution, ergo, they deny reality, no different than a religion, because "woke" IS a religion.
@@anthonybrett… that is the single most idiotic thing I read all day pffftt
@@anthonybrett lol what?
I find it hard to believe in that with the lack of the stages of evolutionary bones. Even his explanation doesn't make sense as there should be some sort of little changes in bone structure as evolution took place.
@@gregoryhancock8605literally says in the video that a species only looks different when you compare two distant generations and that for example a parent and a child would be virtually identical because the differences are gradual and only apparent after a certain amount of time
So.. that means that after 180 million years we will be aliens 👽
Only if we move to another planet.
Next time someone says i have those fish lips, i know it’s just my ancestral genes showing
you got those fish lips
😂😂😂😂
"my greatest grandpa was a frog" 💀
“my greatest grandpa was a germ”
Very possibly
the french be like /j
ITS HARD TO THINK ITS TRUE BTW ITS NOT LOL 💀
Jokes on you my grandfather 185 million years ago was actually a squid
Really, just took a DNA test and mine was a newt. Further down the link great grandpa ape saw a pretty Neanderthal abs the rest was history. It's all in the DNA. 😊
@@hackman669God did all this sonny boy!
@@arlandolittle7625Are there other stars and planets in the universe in your worldview?
@@Raptor_Ren how could a planet or sun make itself?
@@arlandolittle7625 not the question I asked you. Do you think there are other suns with other planets out there?
'My great grandparents are a fish and so were yours.' Excuse me!!
Right now humanity is closer to the last human than the first.
💀 don't worry evolution is fun as long as you're not the first.
@witheringleaves5431 nope! Humans are always evolving, among the things we will lose from evolution will include things like toes and beards. We just won't be alive to see it but we are always evolving and will always continue to, even though you can't see it. Cheers!
@witheringleaves5431I wouldn’t be so sure of that. Give it some hundred thousand years, advancements in civilisation and changes in environment.
@witheringleaves5431 our design isn't anatomically perfect therefore our body will evolve whenever it's an benefit on what ever we do constantly like the some native people in my country they have 50% larger spleens because every day they go hunting in the water for 1 to 2 minutes multiple times a day
Or people who lives in low density air they have better breathing being I think without 40% out of 100 of air
@witheringleaves5431Well no, evolution is still happening. I'm assuming the commenter just meant we're going to go extinct sometime soon due to our killing of the planet.
I took Philosophy of Biology during my undergrad and the professor hated my “it is what it is until it isn’t” approach to defining species. That’s how I knew he was more of a philosopher than a biologist.
okay what is a cat lion also cat right. stray cat and lion have %95 common dna and also have different sound box, longer(lion) and shorter(pet cat) skull. now look human and chimpanzze they have %98,7 common dna. same amount hair in same amount area. similar instict, charcteristic and organs, same amount bone etc. so if lion is a cat and have common ancestor. must be logically humans and chimps also have common ancestor.
More importantly, we see which believes he has to ontology.
@@Bozon38335It's been said we share more dna with a banana 😅 Whats normal for the spider,,, is chaos to the fly...🍌
@@sharlena-jc5zw its false information. yes we have similar gene with plants approximately %35 - %45 percent. animal and plant common ancestor live 1.5 billion years ago. we share same gene with spider approximately %65 - %70 percent and common ancestor live 500 million years ago. some creatures have short life cycle and quickly jump generaton. example rat. they live 2 years and made many babies. this make them geneticlay more diverse and quickly change dna. even rat closer to us by common ancestor. we have %90 similar dna with dogs, only %88 similar dna with rat. similar thing apear some plants and other animals.
Had To Be Created By Other At The Same Time Or Just A Couple Or Just One?
Ahh, I wonder what nice and lovely things people have to say in the comments
Yeah, I already knew what the comment section would be like before I looked
The comments section is like we gave a million monkeys typewriters, and hoped for one writing Shakespeare.
If you are human and you came from a human couple and each generation before were less people then if you keep going back there will be a first pair of human, the original first human couple.
i left youtube for a few years, now its just full of stupid. the algorithm shows me garbage and comments on interesting videos are deluded. wtf happened
Evolution is a well-established scientific theory supported by a vast body of evidence from various fields such as paleontology, genetics, molecular biology, and comparative anatomy. Some of the key evidence includes:
1. Fossil Record: The fossil record shows a clear progression of life forms over time, with simpler organisms found in older rock layers and more complex ones in younger layers.
2. Homologous Structures: Similarities in the structures of different species suggest a common ancestry. For example, the bone structure of vertebrate limbs (like the arm of a human, the wing of a bird, or the flipper of a whale) shares the same basic arrangement.
3. Comparative Anatomy: Comparative studies of different species' anatomies reveal similarities and differences that align with their evolutionary relationships.
4. Molecular Biology: DNA and genetic studies show patterns of shared genes and molecular sequences among different species, providing strong evidence for common ancestry.
5. Artificial Selection: The process of selective breeding, as demonstrated in domesticated animals and plants, mimics natural selection and leads to observable changes in species over generations.
6. Transitional Fossils: Fossils that exhibit characteristics of both older and more recent species provide evidence for gradual changes over time.
7. Biogeography: The geographical distribution of species aligns with evolutionary predictions, suggesting that organisms evolved in specific regions and then migrated to other areas.
8. Convergent Evolution: Unrelated species in similar environments can develop similar traits due to similar selective pressures, indicating the role of natural selection in shaping adaptations.
The overwhelming convergence of evidence from these diverse fields supports the reality of evolution as a fundamental process shaping the diversity of life on Earth over millions of years. It is essential to recognize that evolution is a scientific theory backed by evidence and not merely a hypothesis or speculation.
“And so was yours.”
Nuh uh
I mean unless you're an illiterate
Evolution of physical appearance is like painting with a tiny brush, one small stroke at a time, placed in random locations
id say thats a better analogy than some others ive heard! good comparison
But many weren't small but big strokes.
And certainly not just at random.
I believe in evolution but the idea that our ancestors was another species is a specuation very similar or course but not the same Growth wise.
@@joshmcgill4639when people talk of micro evolution i.just think adaptation
Bro really thought he had a clean loop video but we all noticed the beginning after the end
Yeah, I've seen so much creators and videos forcefully trying to make that loop clean and they always suck so much 😂 I've seen like 1 or 2 tops that actually achieve it
@@extxvlogsMost of them will not get paid for this, if you think this is not good enough, so please at least appreciate their time and energy to make this content
@@zephyr.8850 who told you I didn't appreciate the whole thing? Who told you I base my whole judgment, praise and critic of their content on just how poorly executed and planned their loop mechanics are? Because I'm for hell sure I didn't say that on my first comment, if you have the mentality of never criticizing anything, good for you, but don't expect others to never point out faults and expect improvements. Those things are minor and inconsecuential, that's why I made light of it, but it seems that even that is way past the moral and human line that shouldn't be crossed! 🙄 I really like this an other's channel content and when I do, I make sure to let them know, so please, for a second, get off your high and mighty horse.
@@extxvlogsI was just saying it's important to respect their efforts. And Calling other people's work sucks is totally not a criticism, And I'm sure anyone else reading your 1st comment thinks the same thing
@@zephyr.8850 You are telling to appreciate his efforts. Efforts for what? For teaching us nonsense like there's NO first human and our ancestors were FISH.
My laptop wasn’t built in a factory, it was just a bunch of random molecules that collected over millions of years to form this 15” Lenovo laptop
This man gave an argument against himself 😂
That’s exactly what happened
I don't even see his point
A thing as simple as laptop doesn't get randomly selected, what makes these foos think human randomly formed, this is to the evolutionist~Adam and eve
You're not a laptop though. Besides a laptop is designed with all the perfect pieces in place. And if you're absolutely convinced humans are a great design then realize how dumb it'd be for a car's exhaust pipe to be the same place where you add oil and gas
actually yt shorts has a huge pause before the loop
He was so proud he made a loop LMAO
Haha
daaaammmn
Ok dude. No need to br rude
That skipped
I most certainly can determine when the message began- twenty eight seconds before the end of the loop.
Fun fact: Our greatest grandfathers were stars. Many of the heavy elements in the universe were created in the cores of stars or when neutron stars collided.
Yep, but we were also gases before we were stars.
so u mean that we were gas, later an star, later a fish, later humans? wtf
@@lolxd1434takes a star to form planets. By sheer luck, we got a mix of all the elements, at the perfect distance, with perfect temperature, and perfect tilt, and boom elements create us all
@@lolxd1434 Do you believe in a floating man who made us?
@@The_E_Lord u mean a powerful God?
Its like aging, nothing looks like its changed day to day, but if you compare two decades a lot has changed
Good example :)
I notice things changing day to day but I suppose others aren't cursed to be as observant and self aware as I am, but I stay humble towards my abilities for the pain it brings me despite enlightenment. Sorry for the ramble, hope you have a nice day
Probably the most relatable analogy possible.
@@frailvoid5844 are you neurodivergent?
@@shwet218 my original comment was half joking since I don't actually view it as enlightenment and just thought it'd be funny to act cartoonishly pretentious. But yeah I do have add, ocd & dysmorphia, ptsd and I've had a couple psychological evaluations and the doctors couldn't tell if I have autism or if it's just anxiety symptoms causing similar symptoms. Anywayz thanks for listening, Shweta
Is that why we've never discovered the missing link? There never was one?
Yes, the question for the "missing link" is stupid. If you ask for a fossile of all "missing links" you need a a fossile of each generation.
It’s like growing out your hair you don’t wake up one day and your hair is drastically longer. But when you compare two pictures months apart you see a drastic change.
yes the hair got longer but it is still just hair
so your just like does not fly or it may just
be in your face lol
How does that compare to macro evolution? I want to know an example of changes of a species.😅
@@Besotted85 I assume you accept microevolution. How can you not wrap your head around the fact that macroevolution is just microevolution on a larger scale?
@@omerta5591 its called adaptation. Not a change in kinds. Which all of us do, or we wont survive.
@@Besotted85 …. Brother, you are lost in the sauce. They don’t change to a different ‘kind.’ Adaptation and microevolution are not the same thing. It’s like you’re looking at evolution backwards. The common ancestors of two different species usually possess the traits of both species. Given enough time those adaptations add up, making them speciate. It’s really that simple. You are drawing an imaginary line between microevolution and macroevolution. Everyone that genuinely understands evolution knows that is just flat-out foolish.
It's very similar to the "sorites paradox" that Micheal talked about in his video "Do chairs exist?"
He talked about when does a chair stops becoming a chair if we remove very little parts by scratching enough times
I like that you can just say Michael and we all know which one you mean
@@thaumaTurtlesYea, everyone knows Micheal Jordan
I honestly have no idea what Micheal he is talking about
@@Leo-ok3uj How the turn tables - Michael Scott
@@Leo-ok3uj Michael Stevens from Vsauce, a popular TH-cam channel
“There is more wisdom in your body than in your deepest reason “
-Nietzche
Cool quote, but than *
@@josephsanchez5697You used “then” instead of “than”
THAN! DAMMIT!
@@josephsanchez5697 Cool quote son but it's not from Freddy Numbchucks, it's actually a quote from Steven Seagal back in the late 1990's when he was playing professional football on the side.
@@jennyanydots2389 Nietzche said this in 1884 on his book “thus spoke Zarathustra “
I mean, he looks like Peter Parker, but he’s no scientist
take a picture of your child from age 2 on everyday. You’ll never notice a difference from day to day, but someday they become a full grown adult and only by comparing different years can you see the change.
but they did not change species at any point.
@@matthewdean7825tgats because age is not evolution.😅
@@matthewdean7825 just an analogy.
@@matthewdean7825*face palm*
@@matthewdean7825Wow you really said that.
"my grandfather 185 million generations ago was a fish"
This helps to paint a picture of evolution
taxonomically we all are in fact fish
Lol. Ok, Vardaman.
So did we have lungs or gills or both when we evolved onto land? There has never been one example of a species change. Evolution is blind faith.
Philosophically we all are a fish
Now i can formally identify myself as a millennium fish
there must be a creator that knows that theres a sperm must reach an egg , the sperm wont ever know that theres an egg to go to ,never knew that theres a certain PH in the womb or before it, never knew that they must be in a huge nomber,
Every male and female depends on each other to exist ,so they must be existed at the same time ,with the same suitable functionality,to manage to reproduce and last ..
Any disorder or a difference in any complicated functionality of both of them ,they will just die.
You have my blessings to become millennium falcon as well 😊
Stop the cap g
@@Ibuyshortno cap. Evolution is a fact
The first fish that started walking on land had the starter guide 💀
For me, it is like getting older. Every morning you look in the mirror and see exactly the same person. Then, one morning you wake up on your 74th birthday…. Wondering why all the people around you seem to have aged so much
Ah, I love this
Bless you so much 😊
👍👍👍
exactly.
there must be a creator that knows that theres a sperm must reach an egg , the sperm wont ever know that theres an egg to go to ,never knew that theres a certain PH in the womb or before it, never knew that they must be in a huge nomber,
Every male and female depends on each other to exist ,so they must be existed at the same time ,with the same suitable functionality,to manage to reproduce and last ..
Any disorder or a difference in any complicated functionality of both of them ,they will just die.
You’re still a human being just old. You don’t become a fish when you get old smh
the first statement was so vsauce-like I was surprised when the music didn't hit.
real
@@sprankbomskuarpanz2276sbonch pop
I wanted to add that the first human was created by God when he breathed in a soul into Adam, but my grandfather 185 million generations ago was a fish
@@Ytekai_real
@@Ytekai_???
just like how in the color spectrum, if u look up very very closely, every color is very identical to the one next to it and to the ones that follow..u won't be able to say "oh, theres the change now"..
Oooo I like this example.
Sorry! Every color IS NOT very like the others. Red is vastly different from green. Black is vastly different from white. The only sameness is that they are colors! Such desperation to discount the need for a creator ____that takes a lot of faith...no facts. Just like the NEED for the evolutionsts' declaration that microevolution and macroevolution are one and the same. There is YOUR need within such a faith but no facts. Before trying to contest the reality that I just pointed out, consult ANY definitional resources. Simply take a little bit of time to look up words with micro and macro as prefixal assignments.
@@gregoryholden3255 bro whatttt in the dictionary u just wrote..when have a i ever compared a red to a very far away color in the spectrum, a green to it? yo take a break from the weed or whatever u smoking
@@OtherPeople159 Well, I stand corrected! However, you are the one who compared colors to evolution. But no matter how hard you try ,red doesn't evolve into a white. No more than a dinosaur evolved into a bird. Yet , the Archaeopteryx is SUPPOSEDLY proof of such a thing! And the land animals ____Pakicetus ____they evolved into whales, according to YOUR persuasion. Man, I'm sorry. But that actually is funny.And you seem to wonder what I'm smoking. Well, I could be smoking that algae that came from the water and became trees! Evolution says that it happened ____algae became trees. If you don't find that ridiculous, there is no such word as ridiculous. But back to what I'm smoking, I think I smoked that kind of algae that had not completely "EVOLVED!" I should learn to wait the required billions of years. Damn.😁
It looks magical
jokes on you, I used the queue feature to watch this as a normal video, therefore preventing it from looping.
There's a point in time where we might decide "that thing has enough traits I recognize it as a human" but you might also recognize that it has traits you don't carry and vice versa. It gets even trickier when you question what we use to determine humanity. If we go by level of mental function then that's just dangerous, it has a high risk of diminishing the personhood of those who are mentally impaired, either due to genetics, injuries, or underprivileged backgrounds. Most of what we consider unique to humanity (written/spoken language, invention) we can also find missing in people born today, varying levels of illiteracy, nonverbal behavior, or lack of problem solving skills. Yet we recognize them as human, or at least anyone worth listening to does
Well we could define something by the development of a species in terms of general characteristics even if, within the species, there are mutations or different morphs, etc.
What, then, would define the species was WHEN the species came to have a collection of traits, such as intelligence, which may have first culminated in a single individual.
Although we might agree that criteria formation may be somewhat subjective or contextual.
No a specific point actually
art? Spirituality? self-recognition in the mirror? thoughts on the afterlife? honour? dignity?
@@tufigeat1781so mental functions, some of which can be found in other species and some of which are lacking in humans.
I judge peoples humanity on how good they cook. If they're tasty, def human.
This confirms that the egg came before the chicken.
how did the egg get there
@@manhunter3429 It was produced by an eggplant 🍆
@@manhunter3429 if animal species came from a previous animal species that means a proto-chicken laid an egg that was a chicken egg.
@@manhunter3429egg laying species existed way before chickens did
Chickens evolved from reptiles. It's thought that birds are the closest living relatives to dinosaurs. Reptiles lay eggs. Checkmate.
Someone compared it to languages. There is no way to tell exactly when Latin turned into Spanish. No point in time where you'd say "your parents speak Latin, but you speak Spanish" it's all about those small changes adding up over time.
Fall of Babylon
@@lamborghinifan13never happened 😭
Language evolution does not work like that
Yes, I speak french but im technically speaking latin
this is why "vulgar latin" is a vague classification
we dont know exactly when "coraticum" turned into "coragium"
As an glorpaneese alien from Glorpan I can’t confirm my great glorpfather was a fish.
I shall now own the ocean because its my great grandpa property 300 million years ago
Native American logic
Ridiculous comment
It's our, you're not the only fish here
Russian logic. I owned Alaska a long time ago. Now I want it back. Putin: I want it my way.
Media: Tell me more. Tell me more.
Putin: A long time a go there was Tsar. He was caught in a jam.
Media: Umm. Ha
Putin: He was late paying his finance!
Media: Tell me more. Tell me more.
Putin: He didn't have the funds to build his palace.
Media: Umm.. Was he drunk or just down on his luck?
Putin: He went to his father but didn't have a buck. Barrowed from his bro. Couldn't pay him back.
Media: Umm... ha. What did he do to pay him back?
Putin: One day he heard a knock. It was Uncle Sam. He offered to buy si really cheap land.
Media: Then what?
Putin: Then he sold them Akaska. Now I want it back!
If this still sounds insane in 2023, I don't know what sanity is
This is society
Satin is a fish
This is Patrick
This is my kingdom come
That means my dad is more monkey than me, let's gooooo
😂👍🏽
😂😂😂
Ape
@@CanKicker68 shawty ape and monkey the same thing different word
@@Sam-og1xd"ape and monkey the same thing"
Monkey is a broader term. Apes are monkeys, humans are apes so humans are technically monkeys, but monkeys aren't apes. Apes never have tails.
this is also a good point against evelution since if they were constantly evolving only by a little then that means that everyone had to evolve at the same time so they could keep breeding and there would have to be enough people evolving at the same time to keep breeding
Fortunately this thing called genetics exist. So traits spread within a population. This isn't a point against evolution. It's just that you forgot about a very basic concept in reproduction.
you said that weird but i think your saying when one person gets a trait their offspring will carry it which is true but since its a mutation then only a small amount of their off spring will carry it.
so when you look at apes the most possible way for them to turn into humans is one becomes slightly more human and all of their features also slightly change including there reproduction system then they have to find another ape in their lifetime that also has that mutation because otherwise they couldn't breed then they have to have 2 children both with that mutation and then they breed have children and the cycle repeats and doesn't break for a couple hundred years. Now there is a chance another ape gets the mutation but that doesn't matter and doesn't really change much unless your gonna say hundreds of a[e got born with a specific mutation and bred with each other.
then that whole process happens hundred of thousands of times apes have slightly changed. And that is my ted talk thank you
@@GrandBaconBrother Traits spreading does not require both parents to have it. But yes, you've just described how evolution works.
@@SilverEye91 i understand that but both parents need it because there reproductive system would have changed have you seen the video with like the snail that spirals left and not right. Well he needs another left spinning snail to reproduce because it’s organs are different
@@GrandBaconBrother For the reproductive system to change that much you would need a really, really, really long time. That's a change that happens slowly over a population. Did you watch the video? Because you clearly missed the point.
When dumb people think of evolution, they think we're suggesting a Pokemon-esque kinda evolution.
Like pawmi to pawmot or feebas to milotic or remoraid to octillery
I mean it does happen with butterflies though...
Even tho I'm a religious person this made me laugh out loud 😂
NOTE: I am religious but not a stupid blind follower 😅😅
Whose your favorite pokemon?
@@RajMGandhi Nah, that's called "metamorphosis" and it too is something that had to evolve over time.
We're all distant cousins. You and your cat have common ancestors, even the trees around us are family. We're all related!
The fact that we are related to both cats and trees should let you know that the concept of common ancestor is not at all related to ancestry and is actually just proof that all living beings are created in likeness and therefore share similarities which DO NOT necessarily indicate that they are related.
When have you ever seen a species of animal mix with a human biologically? Or a human tree hybrid? Though we share half our dna with bananas we are neither able to evolve nor devolve into bananas, we are completely seperate beings which are incapable of mixing. Our similarity in DNA is just that, a similarity. Not even the top scientist in the top labs can mimic the “evolution” from one species to another not even in a lab but people will blindly believe anything.
@@Jasel2892 In your case, the percentage of DNA you share with bananas is very likely over 90%
@@Jasel2892 now that's a comment with a good thought
@@Jasel2892but I saw a human tree hybrid in doraemon 🥺
@@Jasel2892 you don’t believe in evolution?🤨
I like to imagine the evolutionary progress like growing grass.
You look at it for seconds, minutes, hours and you don't see it changing at all, but it did, it's just such a small change that you didn't even notice. You will notice the change if you come back to check maybe in a week.
So why did evolution stop?
No apes evolving to humans now.
The idea of an alien interbreeding with a monkey sound less extravagant.
Bro literally has the photos of his five generations. I don't even have a picture of my grandfather
So
I don't even have a picture of ME
@@Abdulilkebabbaro so
@@Abdulilkebabbarowhy not
@@Bigbballbadmint9n I don't like taking selfies, I only have photos of my friends and landscapes
My ass wouldve stayed in the primordial soup if i knew there was gonna be day like this
Imagine being born a different species than your parents.
@Tovalokodoncthe video is rediculas and so is the concept of course there HAS to be a point where one species became the next because ITS A NEW SPECIES just cause you cant tell the difference doesnt cange the obivious fact
@@Jamesishappygradual change is the key. There is no point where a bloodline changes species or genetics completely. To see a different species is to compare with far away cousins or far away ancestors. Don't say it's ridiculus just because you don't understand what he explained.
@@fduck3794gradual change theory. Let scientist cook
@@Jamesishappyif you take it literally it is ridiculous, which would be ridiculous to do so. He refers to the fact that the change was never too big. The difference between one generation and the next would be extremely unnoticeable, like having the nose 1milimeter shorter or stuff like that. It's not that hard to get the point.
@@Jamesishappylooks like you failed both science and english class
It's a product of people in many of our societies being trained to think the world and everything in and around it fits in to neat, clearly separate boxes and that nothing is a gradient.
It’s also comparable to growing and ageing. There wasn’t a day where you woke up a toddler after having been a baby, a day where you woke up to being an adolescent after being a child, or a day where you woke up an adult. Or a day where you woke up ‘old’. It all happens so gradually. There’s no way to pinpoint an exact time.
Idk why but this messed with my head lol
@@zzzzzzhhhhh678 😄😅😂 yes! When I heard this analogy a while ago from an interview of evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins it also resonated with me. It helped me understand the gradual transition from one species to the next.
Wait I still don’t understand. Is this video stating that monkey, chicken, and human all come from the same ancestor? I hope someone could clarify for me. Thank you
@@alexfengerson7982 All life shares a common ancestor 😊
@@simonmandel2621 Who said that?
*seeing my first ancestor walk on land* GO GRANDPA GO!
Same here bro😂
I'm about to go kick my grandpa back into the ocean.
His grandpa was a fish, but my grandpa was a fisherman. Don’t call my grandpa fish again 😠
my granpa had 5 schlongs
We all started simple. From our original father Adam and our Mother Eve. End of story. This bonzo in the video makes no sense.
@@aneesahussein1522 Cool fairy tale bro
@@brazenbull36 shhhhh. These people are a little slow in the head, don't call them out bro
Hmm kinda fishy..
So actully, everyone is a fish.😂
no because fish isn't a cladistic term
No One:
My 185 million yr old Grandfather: I used to swim 10miles for school
😆lol there's no gradual change even over millions of years , that's a belief,a mythology without an evidence.
In science, there's mutations causes illnesses, disorders and disfunctionality.
Even so , the creature will die before even creating a single function ,before even finding the same changed creature with the same changes but a female in the same area and the acceptance to reproduce,or they will just die with their changes😂
🤓Growing for humans and animals prove also the parents wont accept the changed child and it wont last.. so every created period of the creature from the sperm to the growing baby ,wont accept the changes🤣
Upstrean
Both ways
“You can’t tell when this video begins or ends”
TH-cam shorts: creating a small cut after the shorts end and restart
Imagine a gradient of blue to green, each end is different but in the middle its very hard to say when one stops and the other starts
pretty cool way to understand it ngl
The only problem is this analogy probably doesn't apply to humans. The theory is the fusion of chromosome 2 happened over a single generation, and that possibly resulted in higher cognitive capability. Either way going from 48 to 46 chromosomes, is a substantial enough change you could consider the new off spring a different species. So there probably is a first human at that point in particular
@@thecapitalisticdictator2256mutation
there is no proof for blind evolution and many miniscule differences leading to new organisms or new organs. this atheist claim that has never been proven, but widely believed because of atheist brainwashing people from kindergarden. for any significant organism to survive it need to have all the necessary parts for its survival. an organism with half of an organ can not survive
I like to think it this way : If it's raining in one city and not in the neighbouring one, then there is not exact location where the rain abruptly ends
So your telling me ive been a cannibal my whole life
Fr though I've been eating fish in my whole life
Fr, I’ve been eating human meat my whole life
@@BONDOcanttakecriticism r/woooosh
Ah, some of my fondest childhood memories are of paddling in primordial shallow seas listening to great grandpa fish tell his stories
That's not how any of that works
I love how he specified 185 *MILLION* years between current humanity's relation with fish and all you heard was...
Humans related to fish, evolution man dumb I not fish I person🗿
You not understanding the argument doesn't make it untrue
"so, just like you can’t tell when this video begins or ends"
Me: looks at the red bar on the bottom
Edit: I also know how the short started
😂
Facts same 😂😂😂😂
Right……….that part!!!
I was thinking, ontop of the shorts don't loop smoothly.
All of us
YES! Our gills magically turned to lungs, we sprouted legs, and began our journey as Fishuman!!
What great amount of faith it takes to believe in a process that started, hmmm, Idk, 400 million years ago!
Who said anything about magic?
@@SilverEye91
It wouldn’t be considered a “miracle” or “magic” for the cold-blooded to somehow morph into warm-blooded mammals over millions of years?
Name one example of a change in kind that is observable…. Just name one… you can’t.
If one subscribes to the evolution of the universe / living organisms, your worldview ultimately collapses. No meaning, no purpose-just randomness.
No objective truth, no objective morality, no objective purpose.
Christ is KING.
@@4_CHRIST_musicOkay. The development of a new artery present in humans that used to be really uncommon just a hundred years ago. That was easy.
@@4_CHRIST_musicAnd I said nothing about your religion. Evolution does not state that God doesn't exist.
@@SilverEye91
Evolution is for people who think they are smarter than the One who created them. The Lord God gave us His Word-including the creation narrative.
The natural man cannot understand the things of the Spirit, they are foolishness to him. (1 Corinthians 2:14)
“Let no one deceive himself. If anyone among you thinks that he is wise in this age, let him become a fool that he may become wise.”
[1 Corinthians 3:18]
If One trusts in Christ for their salvation, they must also trust in His Word.
Soo, let's read the comments.. (pops some antidepressants)
Brought some popcorn for all the salt 🍿
Which came first, the chicken or the egg? The egg, because if you go back enough generations there was a time when they weren't chickens, but they were still laying eggs.
The Chicken came first. I had this debate in university. If evolution is correct, the predecessor to the chicken would have evolved to be a chicken. Which would have mated and laid eggs.
Nah, God created all things.
@@memetrain2702 Obvious troll is obvious.
@@TheBaconWizard What does that even mean?
@@trustmebrobro
It's just as likely that that mutation would happen to the egg being laid. Many animals are born/hatched with mutations
As soon as I saw over 20k comments under a video about evolution, I knew damn well what's happening 😅. More entertaining than watching actual clowns 🤡
Evolution denyiers are smth else
@@Ivory-f5bthey call us fools for believing we came from fish (which, in of itself is a gross oversimplification) but they themselves think that a more righteous, or more feasible explanation is that they came from two humans created by a divine entity who got decieved by an evil snake and got kicked out of lalaland
@@Ivory-f5b fr lmao
@@Ivory-f5b
They really are.
They're even smart enough to have basic grammar and spelling skills.
Give solidified proof of evolution of millions of years that isn't a scientific theory... you can't
"It is not good for the man to be alone. I will make a helper suitable for him."
This is a great way to melt someone's brain who asks the chicken and egg question!!
That, or you point out that eggs evolved (in other species) before chickens did, and they get annoyed at you for missing their point.
Don't worry, I ordered them online. I'll let you know
@@ronaljitningthoukhongjam8325 I’m not sure I’m understanding you correctly. Are you saying that modern chicken eggs appeared and have no traceable origin to any chicken ancestors? Because that’s blatantly false lol.
You may be confusing the part about how we don’t know when the first amniotic eggs came to be, because that amniotic layer cannot be fossilized, but that’s a completely different idea altogether, and occurred millions of years before chickens or their direct modern ancestors began to appear.
@@ronaljitningthoukhongjam8325 could you back that claim up with any sources? I’ve been googling trying to find what you’re talking about, and cannot come up with anything remotely close to what you’re talking about…
What bird was “confirmed” to be early wild chickens with entirely different shell composition? I can’t even find discussions about shell composition at this point lol.
Basically, this is information I am not seeing anywhere except from you, so if you know what it is or what you’re referencing, I’d love to take a look at it, because I currently don’t believe you, but I’m certainly interested in being educated if I’m wrong and/or don’t have access to the correct information!
Chicken.
The egg is a potential chicken, not a guaranteed chicken.
Can you imagine being the "first" zebra?
_First zebra:_ "Uh, hey guys what's up?"
_Proto-zebras:_ "oh God, it's Stripey, he's gonna get us all killed, standing out like that..." 😮💨
the "proto- zebra" would also be stripey, just not as stripey.
@Cookie_85 very true
@@Cookie_85 unless it was rapid evolution like what happened in Hawaii with the crickets becoming silent after a parasite fly started laying it's eggs in the noisy ones.
Whatever atheist. Last example was bs the video starts when you first start spitting nonsense out of your mouth.
Btw evolution is not a fact it's a theory. Read science peasants jobless youtubers these days thinks they are over smart.
I enjoyed this short and it makes a good point, although it is not strictly true in all cases. It applies to most animals, including humans. But some plants, and even a few animals, have undergone a form of "instant speciation" called polyploidy where the number of chromosomes increases in a single generation, such that parent and offspring can no longer interbreed.
Thank you for making this comment! I was afraid I would have to write it myself, I’m really glad someone else already pointed it out.
In a sense that's a special case of the rule.
Also he failed to prove that the first human didn’t happen, he just said we can’t prove there WAS a first human.
@@karbonkillershorts8551 no that’s not what he said
@karbonkillershorts8551 there is literally no such thing as the first human
Ok so my fear of sharks arose 185 million generations ago.