You'll love my answer to this TJoC question: why does Michael Schmidt have the same voice as Scott? My theory is this: aside from sharing the same voice actor, the demon in the form of Michael replicated Scott's voice because the latter spoke directly to the former in the beginning of the game, which allowed Michael to have a close enough analysis of Scott's voice to replicate it, allowing him to speak. This is why none of the other physical entities in TJoC cannot speak, because Scott (or anyone else) never spoke directly to him. My backup evidence is that right after Scott was yelling to the phantoms in the computer in the basement (I'll say which ignited animatronic I believe is which in your next video), they were able to send messages to Michael via the monitors, since they got the ability to speak from Scott speaking directly to them. (The phantoms cannot talk otherwise, because they are non solid entities that were only able to exist through the monitors in the basement and couldn't appear otherwise). Not only did Scott indirectly lend his voice to Michael to allow him to speak, this also made it so Michael would be able to possess Scott easier than the others in the family, all from stealing his voice! I have an answer to why the Ignited got ignited in the first place as well. I will give that answer later.
Well, I mean, I guess it *could* be possible. 😅 But the Pit Bonnie being manifested of agony and the fact of other people dying in springlock suits *does* make sense now that I’ve thought about it. 😅
@@Nate-ngaming In the fourth closet novel Afton had a machine duplicate of his Springtrap form from the previous novel, he used it to taunt one of Charlie's friends that Baby had captured.😅 The 'Clone' was entirely machine and used illusion disc technology. Maybe he had something similar in the games?(I don't have any evidence of but SL did introduce the kinds of tech necessary, so it could be possible.😅)
Twisty, I was with you right up to the conclusion. Scraptrap talks to you as William Afton. Springtrap did not. (Can't remember how that worked in UCN). If that's the case, then Scraptrap is Afton and Springtrap is some poor schmuck who got trapped in the springlock suit.
You know, for years people were saying that tuft of hair was from a stuffed child. I think this video just made me realize that it was probably the employee in there all along.
I'm pretty sure a phone guy phone call in an early game could answer what happened to Fnaf 4 spring lock victim. 'Missing persons posters will be put up and the premises will be thoroughly bleached and carpets replaced.' Seems like this would've occurred under a post incident lockdown of a restaurant. Easy to dispose of a body and or suit or even harvest remnant in that time frame, especially if you were head spring lock technician AND a co-owner and founder of the business in which all this occurred. Afton's presence would be mandatory at this time and he'd be calling the shots to the lower down employees.
I just wanted to say that William Afton is an idiot. I mean, when you're inside a spring lock suit that you've worn while murdering children, who does something that reckless? If William Afton really is the one killing kids, then he would know that all he'd have to do is sit down and wait for the souls to leave before walking out of the pizzeria. Come on, a child murderer like Afton (supposedly) would know not to rush things, he's killed kids in that suit for crying out loud! Also may I just point out the murdering kids in a spring lock suit or doing something stupid like that would almost certainly cause the spring locks to fail but hey, what do I know? He's only running around a room killing helpless children, I mean, there must've been some kind of spring lock failure (I've looked for an explanation and it's just a plot hole, we want answers!). For this to make sense Afton would have to never set foot in a spring lock suit which would make him innocent. I mean, who in their right mind would think that? (*plays fnaf 6*) Ok, the new question is who in their right mind wouldn't think that? Please hear me out! It fills in every plot hole in this story (except for that one about how the killer never had a spring lock failure while killing children), oh and what was it that Mr. Hippo said? "Sometimes a story's just a story," and guess what? FNaF is a story about a family (the Afton's) torn apart by one man's actions. That man's NOT William Afton, it's Henry Emily. Don't worry, you don't have to go get your eyes checked, you read that correctly, Afton ain't the killer. There's so much evidence supporting this theory that if Afton is the killer, then Scott Cawthon was probably drunk while making fnaf 6 (and pretty much the entire fnaf series) and last I checked he doesn't drink so yeah... Here's the evidence! 1. Scott Cawthon never confirmed that Afton is the killer, he just confirmed that Purple Guy. You may be thinking, "Well Abigale, that makes no sense! The two statements have the same meaning!" And no, they don't, just because someone's a Purple Guy doesn't mean that they kill children. Case in point, Michael Afton. Unless this is the first time you've picked up your phone since 2016, then you know that Michael's innocent, yet he's sometimes referred to as Purple Guy. 2. SAVE THEM mini game Afton and Pink Guy aren't the same person, why would Scott change the same character's design for one mini game? No, it's not meant to show that Afton's changed as a person and has become a monster, if you do think that the different design choices is representative of Afton changing as a person, then here's the proof. The long and short of it is just simply that if Afton was the killer, then he went from his old self (Pink Guy from the Take Cake mini game, FNaF 2) to a ruthless children murderer just minutes afterwards (Orange Guy from FNaF 6) back to his old self (Pink Guy from the Foxy GO! GO! GO! mini game from FNaF 2), and just a few years later back to a ruthless child murderer (Purple Guy from the SAVE THEM mini game from FNaF 2). If that made no sense to you, it's because it doesn't! Odds are the two are different people, if they aren't, then just what was Scott thinking while writing this line? "I should've known you wouldn't be content to disappear," something that Henry says to Charlie, his own flipping daughter, while talking about her death! Give a good reason why Henry said it like that! Please, give me something other then "Well Henry hasn't been confirmed to be a character in the games!" (wow, you really didn't play fnaf 6, did you?) or "Scott Cawthon confirmed that Afton is the Purple Guy!" (have you read any of this?). 3. Henry's monologue! Oh my gosh, how am I the *first person to notice this? How? I mentioned it earlier, but that ain't the only strange thing going on with his monologue. So Henry lures all the animatronics to the FNaF 6 location ("You have all been called here. Into a labyrinth with no end, a maze with no prize") similar to how the killer lures kids into a secret room to kill them, and mind you, none of these animatronics are possessed by someone who was lured by the killer. Charlie was just stabbed out in the open, Afton got spring locked, Scrap Baby was scooped, and Molten Freddy is just fueled by Remnant. Why would Henry stay in the burning building? Because he wants to die, he wants to use him Remnant, that's what it's been about from the beginning. Becoming immortal. That's he said "I should've known you wouldn't be content to disappear" to Charlie, he should've known that she wouldn't stay dead, that she would come after him. This also places where in the timeline Henry made the Funtime Animatronics (confirmed that Henry made them in FNaF 6’s insanity ending. The insanity ending has a lot of evidence suggesting that Henry’s guilty) since he would have to know about Remnant and do something bad with it, ie making animatronics designed to kill/abduct children, so he’d have a motive to kill Charlie. Henry probably didn’t just kill Charlie for her Remnant because in his monologue he makes it seem like Charlie just had bad luck and found out about the Funtime Animatronics. I would write down more evidence, I really would, there's so much evidence supporting this, but I can't finish writing this down so sorry, you'll have to wait for me to blow your mind for another day. But one more thought, Cassidy's soul was still around during the events of FNaF 6, why didn't Henry lure her to the FNaF 6 location. Answer, to let her loose on Afton if he escaped. Before you go criticizing this idea, just rethink the entire series through the perspective that Henry is the killer and see how much more it makes sense. *first person I know of, odds are someone has noticed these things before me and come to the same conclusion.
The biggest piece of evidence that there are multiple Spring Bonnie suits is the head in the backroom that's clearly different from the one we see on the stage. Also, Afton could've put just the original Springtrap endoskeleton in this other suit and then used some spare Fredbear suit parts, hence why the snout is similar to Golden Freddy's. This would explain why it has Afton's mind, a different corpse and some suit parts that seemingly came from Golden Freddy.
6:34 well actually no william wasnt always evil when he putted the Springbonnie suit on someone that was before c.c's death william became crazy because of the death of his son
Makes sense that all spring lock suits have a basic mimicry program in the animatronic portion. If they were all made in the mid to late 70's, it also makes sense that this limited programming would be trained by someone wearing the suit. Wear the suit while it records your performance as the character. Then when it's placed into animatronic mode, it mimics your recorded performance. The fact that William has survived being spring locked once also makes sense in the context of Remnant and Agony. The suit he survived was likely the "Jackie" suit at the Sister Location that Circus Baby puts Mike into. This suit would have an early imprint of William's Agony in it, which would explain a lot if it occurred before 1983. This could lead William to discover the concept of Remnant/Agony well before any of the other major events and tragedies of the games. While also explain how Glitchtrap came into existence from scanning the surviving memory and chips of the Spring Bonnie spring lock animatronic suit. The M.X.E.S. computer was probably where they backed up the recorded performances. The animatronic suits would likely have limited memory back in the 70's and no one would want to record a performance each and every time it needs to be done by the animatronic. Existing hardware from the 70's, upgraded and repurposed to suppress the Mimic, as in the Jackie spring lock Endo. The Mimic would likely be the last surviving remnant of William's murderous persona that the protagonists of SB & HW2 couldn't erase. Likely due to it being an imprint if William's Agony rather than a program. Which makes sense because Glitchtrap is confined to be erased as of HW2, which takes place before Ruin. So much makes sense if all three are spring lock animatronics with mimicry programming.
It's probably a mix of their being multiple springlock suits & all the corrupted circuitboards in FnafAR creating multple 'springtraps'. It got so bad Fazbear Entertainment sent out Endos with flamethrowers to hunt them down.
burntrap is still william afton but i dont think scrap trap is also why isnt there 2 springtraps in fnaf 3 just one that isnt a human cause isnt there william afton and springbonnie?
I have always thought that the FNAF 4 performer died in that suit, however I don't think it can be scraptrap simply because of the obvious purple guy lines. They have to be Afton. Thanks for covering this though!
One bit of repetition from me; Scott himself said there were 'lore reasons' for the difference between Fnaf 3 Springtrap and Scraptrap despite them being the same guy canonically. I think this is a parallel to the Twisted ones as Springtrap in that book loses an arm in a confrontation with robo Charlie, giving him a resemblance to Scraptrap at that moment, his body also didn't decay like Fnaf 3 Springtrap in the novel, it fused with the endoskeleton and became like a cyborg with the fabric shell having grown mouldy from the blood loss from the crush. Lefty in FFPS may be a loose parallel to Twisted Freddy (loose because he serves the same purpose but lacks several key features.) With this in mind events similar to the twisted ones novel may have occurred off screen in the games as for being designed by Henry, Lefty has a major design contradiction: It has a control shock function AND a dream wand soother. The dream wand would disable the puppet and by default Charlotte's will to fight the suit by gentle means; music. The controlled shock feature is straight out of sister location and violently forces the puppet into submission within the suit, Something Henry wouldn't have done to her. The point being that this feature is Afton technology as I said, it's straight out of sister location. To make matters worse UCN proves the control shock function won out over the dream wand soother; Lefty's voice lines feature an incredibly shrill female voice gesturing kindly to the player as they die, indicating Charlotte Emily was relentlessly control shocked repeatedly while in the suit as the puppet. FFPS seems to have a Twisted Ones/Fourth Closet hybrid event narrative occur before it's actual gameplay as the characters present in the game indicate with their presence and appearance. Fnaf 6 or FFPS may have brought the Silver eyes trilogy into the game canon via some direct character parallels.
I’ve been thinking about creating my own five nights at freddy’s timeline. It would also consist of a mix mash of different people’s videos that fit with this timeline. A few of your videos would be in it. I’m excited to see it in action once I’m done writing it out.
Simple answer he got springlocked was in fnaf three after the fire his suit molded and melted into diffrent shape and the reason he looks diffrerent in fnaf 6 is because Scott wanted a new designe for his comeback bruh same thing with S.B
WHAT A VIDEO!! Ive never heard this theory before but, it makes ALOT of sense. Honestly,having multiple spring bonnie varients with different motifs is such a compelling plot point for the story!! Also, *eats popcorn* IS THAT MY ART!?! TYSM FOR PUTTING IT IN YOUR VIDEO! I liked and shared ;]
Listen, Twister. I believe the reason why Scraptrap's (Willy newtron's) design looks different is because of the indie game developer. Let me explain. The games that we have played (fnaf 1 to ultimate custom night) are all in universe games made by the indie game developer (but what happens in the games really happend in the fnaf universe), he just messed up on Scraptrap's design and that is why he looks like that. Please do a video on this theory.
Maybe Springtrap is a Mimic AI programm that William created for his clone version of himself with remnant and then hides somewhere!? Maybe Mimic also connected to Springtrap?.. Maybe also Mimic the one who cause the fire in Fazbear's Frights, because Mimic was the one who seen the first fire incident in Fall Fest, maybe suited Afton in Glitchtrap costume with Mimic did something.. That cause the fire! Hmmm... Also Springtrap was in Help Wanted 2 as a boss in burned location of the Fall Fest!!!
MAYBE IN SECURITY BREACH MIMIC IMITATING THE REAL WILLIAM AFTON AND CREATED CLONE VERSION OF SPRINGTRAP -> BURNTRAP!!! THAT CONFIRMS THE TRAILER ABOUT SECURITY BREACH WHEN WILLIAM TALKS TO TWO CHARACTERS AND WARNED THAT HE WILL BURN THEM IF THEY FAIL!!!
Maybe in Secuirty Breach Mimic imitating the real William Afton and created clone version of Springtrap -> Burntrap!! That confirms the trailer about Security Breach when William talks to two characters and warned that he will burn them if they fail!!
Also, Springtrap was a fool in FNaF 3, because he easily get tricked by laugh of kid.. Or what if Springtrap was what's left of William, maybe Mimic broke bones for his endo or other endo to fitr in? maybe Mimic like goes into Springtrap?! Or else..
Before watching this... The answer is clear. FNAF Special Delivery made replica Animatronics of many different characters. Special Delivery SpringTrap and the terribly accurate AI was one of those replicas.
Every Afton: dang who are you (the classic Afton: bro, you’re me I just cloned myself multiple times so we can take over the world and you don’t even know me stupid
If there are multiple springtraps weve never seen one in proper gamsplay yet. As fnaf3 springtrap is very clearly meant to be the killer afton as we see through the minigames and scraptrap is outright listed and credited as afton
Well from what I heard, the other guy who got spring locked first turned into shadow Bonnie and scrap trap is William Afton changing his suit to the suit that the person turned into shadow Bonnie but shadow Bonnie looks like toy Bonnie I don’t really think it makes sense
Listen there are two different suit designs for spring Bonnie after the fire springtrap will be badly damaged William probably took parts from the different design of spring Bonnie to fix his one that he's trapped in because why else would he have buck teeth
I dont really think there would be multiple springtraps I know everyone and everything opens up that there are many of them. But If there were different springtraps, then here is a question. Why woud be there multiple springtrap as phone guy said only 1 dead springlocked the other guy and William. So in my opinion scott said that he wants to give purple guy a bug role in FNAF. So it is probably he wants to make springtrap a immortal being. Cause as he said he wants to guve him a "BIG ROLE". So I think thats the role he was talking about. And when phone guy said there was a springlock death before WILLIAM. It does not mean that he wanted to test. I think it meant that he wanted nothing. So even if the person died. It is not a random person, cause if it would've been then there should be a mystery behind the guy a lore to HIM. And springtrap's most iconic line he always comes back meant that he did and still does. So there is not different springtraps. (not hating just telling my thoughts)
It was confirmed by Scott after people complained about bugs, he said it was part of the hallucinations when there was a certain error (I think it was Ventilation) a 2nd fake Springtrap would appear. This creates the theory the reason all the phantoms have the same eyes as Springtrap is because he controls them with duplicate Springtrap just adding
IF william somehow possessed the other spring Bonnie suit (scraptrap) then what happend to the other spring Bonnie suit (spring trap) did he just leave it or do something with it? Did he re-use that suit and that's how we got burntrap? That's just my theory. After help wanted his soul re-enteted the real world and possessed the spring trap suit and he turned into burntrap. Coud be a possibility
Scraptrap has to be Afton. It’s literally his name in fnaf 6. Also, he’s British, and so is Michael. And pretty much everyone agrees that Michael is William’s son
i honestly dont fully think this theory is true because the other failures in the springlock suits at fredbears are the shadows they got the short end of the stick and turned into the shadow creatures
What are the odds of having 2 differents persons each in a spring lock bunny theme suit ? There’s only 1 springtrap At most you can possibly say that the mimic was possessed by him and become a somewhat another springtrap
HEAR ME OUT.. this man who apparently got stuffed/springlocked in an other springlock suit, he got springlocked in not the same springbonnie suit as william's cause we can see it looks ALOT more different, it has the scraptrap suit but my theory is that after fnaf's 3 fire springtrap with his broken suit removed what he could and got back to the old fredbear's family diner and he gets off the scraptrap suit that was on that man that died in the fnaf 4 minigame but he couldnt have gotten springlocked in that scraptrap like suit, because if he did got springlocked the helmet would've been stuck on his head as we all sall william put the suit's head on him, so my theory is that the guy just got killed and then stuffed inside this unwithered scraptrap suit was left to die and since that scraptrap suit was shaped like toy bonnie the dead stuffed guy became shadow bonnie's soul, and after fnaf 3, 32years after, burnt and damaged springtrap goes back to fredbear's diner where he finds that suit with the dead corpse inside it, and the man probably didnt possesed that suit since william extracted his remnant before he could attach it to the suit and posses it like the others, so william just let the corpse here and since the springlocks werent off, he just gently slided the suit off of the guy and putted it on looking like scraptrap and having a toy bonnie jaw like and head like!! hope i get some likes for all this writing and an answer if am wrong or right or anything shoulc change!! THKS FOR READIN!!!!
@@TwistedAnimatronic It's the Least I could do, I would've done more if I could but sadly I could only become a Golden Twisted One I apprieciate all the Theories and continue to watch every last one of them as much as I can! Edit : Only just realized I have these 2 little guys :
Pit Trap was a Agony Manifested Memory, That was Able to Exit into the Real world But i Question How he was Able to Aquire the illusion Tech to appear as Ozwold's Father. And We Find out that Oz is in the Same Scenario, Being a Machine himself Mabey Pit Spring bonnie got Help from Elanour. Or was a Construction made by Elanour to Cause more Agony than what already Happened. Pit Spring Bonnie Was Using illusion Disk Tech to Appear as the Dad.
I know this series is convoluted, but even this feels a bit far for Scott 😅 Not to mention most theories don’t really have room for a second springtrap to exist. This feels like the beginning of shoving squares in circular pegs.
Why do people bring up the books for these theories when we all know the first four games have nothing to do with and didn't take into account of the books bro literally smashing together lore that doesn't correlate
![F.HERO Ft. JSPKK x ลำไย ไหทองคำ x M-PEE - ไม่สนิทบิดหมด (Thai Riders Anthem) [Official MV]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/kPJZ0UihBfk/mqdefault.jpg)
![fellow fellow - พรุ่งนี้ไม่มีใครรู้ feat. INK WARUNTORN [OFFICIAL MV]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/QP6JyjYx_W0/mqdefault.jpg)
*MEMBERSHIPS ARE LIVE!!!* Get your name in the next video and join now!! - www.youtube.com/@TwistedAnimatronic/membership
Yayyy
YAY!
You'll love my answer to this TJoC question: why does Michael Schmidt have the same voice as Scott?
My theory is this: aside from sharing the same voice actor, the demon in the form of Michael replicated Scott's voice because the latter spoke directly to the former in the beginning of the game, which allowed Michael to have a close enough analysis of Scott's voice to replicate it, allowing him to speak.
This is why none of the other physical entities in TJoC cannot speak, because Scott (or anyone else) never spoke directly to him.
My backup evidence is that right after Scott was yelling to the phantoms in the computer in the basement (I'll say which ignited animatronic I believe is which in your next video), they were able to send messages to Michael via the monitors, since they got the ability to speak from Scott speaking directly to them. (The phantoms cannot talk otherwise, because they are non solid entities that were only able to exist through the monitors in the basement and couldn't appear otherwise).
Not only did Scott indirectly lend his voice to Michael to allow him to speak, this also made it so Michael would be able to possess Scott easier than the others in the family, all from stealing his voice!
I have an answer to why the Ignited got ignited in the first place as well. I will give that answer later.
'You have to get up, you have to find help, you know what will happen if he catches you.' 'You know what you have seen.' - Fnaf 4.
*grabs some exotic butters* Do tell twisty. I'm intrigued.
I gotchu! You're gunna love this!
Well, I mean, I guess it *could* be possible. 😅
But the Pit Bonnie being manifested of agony and the fact of other people dying in springlock suits *does* make sense now that I’ve thought about it. 😅
💧sweaty af👅 all saltyyy.
Afton must be cloning
Classic AFTON
Greedy afton
@@Nate-ngaming In the fourth closet novel Afton had a machine duplicate of his Springtrap form from the previous novel, he used it to taunt one of Charlie's friends that Baby had captured.😅 The 'Clone' was entirely machine and used illusion disc technology. Maybe he had something similar in the games?(I don't have any evidence of but SL did introduce the kinds of tech necessary, so it could be possible.😅)
@@AloneTheorist i read the book so long ago that i forgot😅 thanks for telling!
Now we know where Star Wars got it from… I mean, machine used to clone someone who just won’t stay dead. Where have I seen that before…🤔
Twisty, I was with you right up to the conclusion. Scraptrap talks to you as William Afton. Springtrap did not. (Can't remember how that worked in UCN). If that's the case, then Scraptrap is Afton and Springtrap is some poor schmuck who got trapped in the springlock suit.
You know, for years people were saying that tuft of hair was from a stuffed child. I think this video just made me realize that it was probably the employee in there all along.
I'm pretty sure a phone guy phone call in an early game could answer what happened to Fnaf 4 spring lock victim. 'Missing persons posters will be put up and the premises will be thoroughly bleached and carpets replaced.' Seems like this would've occurred under a post incident lockdown of a restaurant. Easy to dispose of a body and or suit or even harvest remnant in that time frame, especially if you were head spring lock technician AND a co-owner and founder of the business in which all this occurred. Afton's presence would be mandatory at this time and he'd be calling the shots to the lower down employees.
PS HELP THIS REACH more FNAF THEORISTS! Give it a share & I'll send you a freddy head!
Ok I’ll email it to matoat, game theorie, Gavin gonichwa ect
I genuinely want that glamrock freddy head to be honest lol
I just wanted to say that William Afton is an idiot. I mean, when you're inside a spring lock suit that you've worn while murdering children, who does something that reckless? If William Afton really is the one killing kids, then he would know that all he'd have to do is sit down and wait for the souls to leave before walking out of the pizzeria. Come on, a child murderer like Afton (supposedly) would know not to rush things, he's killed kids in that suit for crying out loud! Also may I just point out the murdering kids in a spring lock suit or doing something stupid like that would almost certainly cause the spring locks to fail but hey, what do I know? He's only running around a room killing helpless children, I mean, there must've been some kind of spring lock failure (I've looked for an explanation and it's just a plot hole, we want answers!). For this to make sense Afton would have to never set foot in a spring lock suit which would make him innocent. I mean, who in their right mind would think that? (*plays fnaf 6*) Ok, the new question is who in their right mind wouldn't think that?
Please hear me out! It fills in every plot hole in this story (except for that one about how the killer never had a spring lock failure while killing children), oh and what was it that Mr. Hippo said? "Sometimes a story's just a story," and guess what? FNaF is a story about a family (the Afton's) torn apart by one man's actions. That man's NOT William Afton, it's Henry Emily. Don't worry, you don't have to go get your eyes checked, you read that correctly, Afton ain't the killer. There's so much evidence supporting this theory that if Afton is the killer, then Scott Cawthon was probably drunk while making fnaf 6 (and pretty much the entire fnaf series) and last I checked he doesn't drink so yeah...
Here's the evidence!
1. Scott Cawthon never confirmed that Afton is the killer, he just confirmed that Purple Guy. You may be thinking, "Well Abigale, that makes no sense! The two statements have the same meaning!" And no, they don't, just because someone's a Purple Guy doesn't mean that they kill children. Case in point, Michael Afton. Unless this is the first time you've picked up your phone since 2016, then you know that Michael's innocent, yet he's sometimes referred to as Purple Guy.
2. SAVE THEM mini game Afton and Pink Guy aren't the same person, why would Scott change the same character's design for one mini game? No, it's not meant to show that Afton's changed as a person and has become a monster, if you do think that the different design choices is representative of Afton changing as a person, then here's the proof. The long and short of it is just simply that if Afton was the killer, then he went from his old self (Pink Guy from the Take Cake mini game, FNaF 2) to a ruthless children murderer just minutes afterwards (Orange Guy from FNaF 6) back to his old self (Pink Guy from the Foxy GO! GO! GO! mini game from FNaF 2), and just a few years later back to a ruthless child murderer (Purple Guy from the SAVE THEM mini game from FNaF 2). If that made no sense to you, it's because it doesn't! Odds are the two are different people, if they aren't, then just what was Scott thinking while writing this line? "I should've known you wouldn't be content to disappear," something that Henry says to Charlie, his own flipping daughter, while talking about her death! Give a good reason why Henry said it like that! Please, give me something other then "Well Henry hasn't been confirmed to be a character in the games!" (wow, you really didn't play fnaf 6, did you?) or "Scott Cawthon confirmed that Afton is the Purple Guy!" (have you read any of this?).
3. Henry's monologue! Oh my gosh, how am I the *first person to notice this? How? I mentioned it earlier, but that ain't the only strange thing going on with his monologue. So Henry lures all the animatronics to the FNaF 6 location ("You have all been called here. Into a labyrinth with no end, a maze with no prize") similar to how the killer lures kids into a secret room to kill them, and mind you, none of these animatronics are possessed by someone who was lured by the killer. Charlie was just stabbed out in the open, Afton got spring locked, Scrap Baby was scooped, and Molten Freddy is just fueled by Remnant. Why would Henry stay in the burning building? Because he wants to die, he wants to use him Remnant, that's what it's been about from the beginning. Becoming immortal. That's he said "I should've known you wouldn't be content to disappear" to Charlie, he should've known that she wouldn't stay dead, that she would come after him. This also places where in the timeline Henry made the Funtime Animatronics (confirmed that Henry made them in FNaF 6’s insanity ending. The insanity ending has a lot of evidence suggesting that Henry’s guilty) since he would have to know about Remnant and do something bad with it, ie making animatronics designed to kill/abduct children, so he’d have a motive to kill Charlie. Henry probably didn’t just kill Charlie for her Remnant because in his monologue he makes it seem like Charlie just had bad luck and found out about the Funtime Animatronics.
I would write down more evidence, I really would, there's so much evidence supporting this, but I can't finish writing this down so sorry, you'll have to wait for me to blow your mind for another day. But one more thought, Cassidy's soul was still around during the events of FNaF 6, why didn't Henry lure her to the FNaF 6 location. Answer, to let her loose on Afton if he escaped. Before you go criticizing this idea, just rethink the entire series through the perspective that Henry is the killer and see how much more it makes sense.
*first person I know of, odds are someone has noticed these things before me and come to the same conclusion.
@@FazbearGaming95me too
@@AbigaleWalker-h7sit’s in the FNAF movie
The biggest piece of evidence that there are multiple Spring Bonnie suits is the head in the backroom that's clearly different from the one we see on the stage.
Also, Afton could've put just the original Springtrap endoskeleton in this other suit and then used some spare Fredbear suit parts, hence why the snout is similar to Golden Freddy's. This would explain why it has Afton's mind, a different corpse and some suit parts that seemingly came from Golden Freddy.
6:34 well actually no william wasnt always evil
when he putted the Springbonnie suit on someone that was before c.c's death william became crazy because of the death of his son
Love this video so much. Great delivery of the theory, editing and pacing here! ♥️ Keep it up, can't wait to see more xx
Glad you enjoyed it! xx
Wow weird timing, I been working on a similar theory all morning. Glad my theory is different, good theory and great video! Keep up the good theories!
Damn it the rest of the springtraps are the mimic
Real
Makes sense that all spring lock suits have a basic mimicry program in the animatronic portion.
If they were all made in the mid to late 70's, it also makes sense that this limited programming would be trained by someone wearing the suit.
Wear the suit while it records your performance as the character. Then when it's placed into animatronic mode, it mimics your recorded performance.
The fact that William has survived being spring locked once also makes sense in the context of Remnant and Agony.
The suit he survived was likely the "Jackie" suit at the Sister Location that Circus Baby puts Mike into.
This suit would have an early imprint of William's Agony in it, which would explain a lot if it occurred before 1983.
This could lead William to discover the concept of Remnant/Agony well before any of the other major events and tragedies of the games.
While also explain how Glitchtrap came into existence from scanning the surviving memory and chips of the Spring Bonnie spring lock animatronic suit.
The M.X.E.S. computer was probably where they backed up the recorded performances. The animatronic suits would likely have limited memory back in the 70's and no one would want to record a performance each and every time it needs to be done by the animatronic.
Existing hardware from the 70's, upgraded and repurposed to suppress the Mimic, as in the Jackie spring lock Endo.
The Mimic would likely be the last surviving remnant of William's murderous persona that the protagonists of SB & HW2 couldn't erase.
Likely due to it being an imprint if William's Agony rather than a program.
Which makes sense because Glitchtrap is confined to be erased as of HW2, which takes place before Ruin.
So much makes sense if all three are spring lock animatronics with mimicry programming.
0:20 2x speed is too funny 😂😂
Yep
It actually is😂
You lied.
This confirms our nightmares. Somehow Afton returned.
It's probably a mix of their being multiple springlock suits & all the corrupted circuitboards in FnafAR creating multple 'springtraps'.
It got so bad Fazbear Entertainment sent out Endos with flamethrowers to hunt them down.
I think the psychological aspect of Fnaf would be neat to explore in future videos.
burntrap is still william afton but i dont think scrap trap is also why isnt there 2 springtraps in fnaf 3 just one that isnt a human cause isnt there william afton and springbonnie?
I have always thought that the FNAF 4 performer died in that suit, however I don't think it can be scraptrap simply because of the obvious purple guy lines. They have to be Afton.
Thanks for covering this though!
Its another good day when Twisted uploads!
Enjoy!
7:13 but it would still be older than the main Afton Springtrap...
an afton version of the blob/tangle would be wild tbh
One bit of repetition from me; Scott himself said there were 'lore reasons' for the difference between Fnaf 3 Springtrap and Scraptrap despite them being the same guy canonically. I think this is a parallel to the Twisted ones as Springtrap in that book loses an arm in a confrontation with robo Charlie, giving him a resemblance to Scraptrap at that moment, his body also didn't decay like Fnaf 3 Springtrap in the novel, it fused with the endoskeleton and became like a cyborg with the fabric shell having grown mouldy from the blood loss from the crush. Lefty in FFPS may be a loose parallel to Twisted Freddy (loose because he serves the same purpose but lacks several key features.) With this in mind events similar to the twisted ones novel may have occurred off screen in the games as for being designed by Henry, Lefty has a major design contradiction: It has a control shock function AND a dream wand soother. The dream wand would disable the puppet and by default Charlotte's will to fight the suit by gentle means; music. The controlled shock feature is straight out of sister location and violently forces the puppet into submission within the suit, Something Henry wouldn't have done to her. The point being that this feature is Afton technology as I said, it's straight out of sister location. To make matters worse UCN proves the control shock function won out over the dream wand soother; Lefty's voice lines feature an incredibly shrill female voice gesturing kindly to the player as they die, indicating Charlotte Emily was relentlessly control shocked repeatedly while in the suit as the puppet. FFPS seems to have a Twisted Ones/Fourth Closet hybrid event narrative occur before it's actual gameplay as the characters present in the game indicate with their presence and appearance. Fnaf 6 or FFPS may have brought the Silver eyes trilogy into the game canon via some direct character parallels.
I’ve been thinking about creating my own five nights at freddy’s timeline. It would also consist of a mix mash of different people’s videos that fit with this timeline. A few of your videos would be in it. I’m excited to see it in action once I’m done writing it out.
Looking forward to that Logan!
Yeah, it’s just taking a bit, because it’s a lot to put together and connect.
He always comes back......
With cloning machines?! What! Is this actualy apart of the script?! R we really gonna tell how he really comes nack
Forget build-a-Mangle, we need build-a-Springtrap.
I love that minigame!
Don’t forget the new into the pit game: DADTRAP.
Edit: hey twisted, it’s me again! Glad to see you back!!
Damn Afton 💀
You made my 2017-2021 fnaf phase come back
Interesting explanation for the hair in FNAF 4's mingame that no one thought of.
*Pulls* *out* *NUKE* now your doomed
"Oh I don't think so"
Simple answer he got springlocked was in fnaf three after the fire his suit molded and melted into diffrent shape and the reason he looks diffrerent in fnaf 6 is because Scott wanted a new designe for his comeback bruh same thing with S.B
4:30 Fullmetal Alchemist..
WHAT A VIDEO!! Ive never heard this theory before but, it makes ALOT of sense. Honestly,having multiple spring bonnie varients with different motifs is such a compelling plot point for the story!!
Also, *eats popcorn* IS THAT MY ART!?! TYSM FOR PUTTING IT IN YOUR VIDEO!
I liked and shared ;]
Glad you enjoyed! And thank you for the great art !!
@@TwistedAnimatronic NP!! 🫶
Legitimately the video I watched before this had a common section with five other purple guys
everyones been cooking since matpat left
Great video!! One of the best I've seen
Wow, thanks!
I love watching your fnaf videos😊.
Twisty? Can you do a fnaf security breach video if so fnaf sb but the missions are randomised
Love your video and keep up the great work you are awesome
This man is the next MatPat
And fnaf 6 confirmed that scrap trap is William Afton because of the true ending
Ever since I saw TheBones5 play his runless challenge Pit Bonnie will always be "Freaktrap" to me.
Afton knows cloning from Naruto
Listen, Twister. I believe the reason why Scraptrap's (Willy newtron's) design looks different is because of the indie game developer. Let me explain.
The games that we have played (fnaf 1 to ultimate custom night) are all in universe games made by the indie game developer (but what happens in the games really happend in the fnaf universe), he just messed up on Scraptrap's design and that is why he looks like that. Please do a video on this theory.
Man I’m happy that I subbed to you lol
This one is very interesting!
I love ur vids twisted they are so interesting
To get the membership, is it just subscribing?
Maybe Springtrap is a Mimic AI programm that William created for his clone version of himself with remnant and then hides somewhere!? Maybe Mimic also connected to Springtrap?.. Maybe also Mimic the one who cause the fire in Fazbear's Frights, because Mimic was the one who seen the first fire incident in Fall Fest, maybe suited Afton in Glitchtrap costume with Mimic did something.. That cause the fire! Hmmm... Also Springtrap was in Help Wanted 2 as a boss in burned location of the Fall Fest!!!
MAYBE IN SECURITY BREACH MIMIC IMITATING THE REAL WILLIAM AFTON AND CREATED CLONE VERSION OF SPRINGTRAP -> BURNTRAP!!! THAT CONFIRMS THE TRAILER ABOUT SECURITY BREACH WHEN WILLIAM TALKS TO TWO CHARACTERS AND WARNED THAT HE WILL BURN THEM IF THEY FAIL!!!
Also, that would solve why Springtrap have endoskeleton inside!!! Because for real.. How?
Maybe in Secuirty Breach Mimic imitating the real William Afton and created clone version of Springtrap -> Burntrap!! That confirms the trailer about Security Breach when William talks to two characters and warned that he will burn them if they fail!!
Also, Springtrap was a fool in FNaF 3, because he easily get tricked by laugh of kid.. Or what if Springtrap was what's left of William, maybe Mimic broke bones for his endo or other endo to fitr in? maybe Mimic like goes into Springtrap?! Or else..
I love the bonus part
That intro was amazing
You got a very cool theory
Before watching this... The answer is clear. FNAF Special Delivery made replica Animatronics of many different characters. Special Delivery SpringTrap and the terribly accurate AI was one of those replicas.
Every Afton: dang who are you (the classic Afton: bro, you’re me I just cloned myself multiple times so we can take over the world and you don’t even know me stupid
So i will say another exist but everytime we see springtrap its William afton
If there are multiple springtraps weve never seen one in proper gamsplay yet. As fnaf3 springtrap is very clearly meant to be the killer afton as we see through the minigames and scraptrap is outright listed and credited as afton
6:41 its said that this is cassidy in golden freddy, a theory though
would be weird if it ended up just being a rando employee kxlling the kids for zero reason XD
Well from what I heard, the other guy who got spring locked first turned into shadow Bonnie and scrap trap is William Afton changing his suit to the suit that the person turned into shadow Bonnie but shadow Bonnie looks like toy Bonnie I don’t really think it makes sense
Listen there are two different suit designs for spring Bonnie after the fire springtrap will be badly damaged William probably took parts from the different design of spring Bonnie to fix his one that he's trapped in because why else would he have buck teeth
I dont really think there would be multiple springtraps I know everyone and everything opens up that there are many of them.
But If there were different springtraps, then here is a question.
Why woud be there multiple springtrap as phone guy said only 1 dead springlocked the other guy and William.
So in my opinion scott said that he wants to give purple guy a bug role in FNAF.
So it is probably he wants to make springtrap a immortal being.
Cause as he said he wants to guve him a "BIG ROLE".
So I think thats the role he was talking about.
And when phone guy said there was a springlock death before WILLIAM.
It does not mean that he wanted to test.
I think it meant that he wanted nothing.
So even if the person died.
It is not a random person, cause if it would've been then there should be a mystery behind the guy a lore to HIM.
And springtrap's most iconic line he always comes back meant that he did and still does.
So there is not different springtraps. (not hating just telling my thoughts)
W vid bro
Isn't Scraptrap literally made from scarp, since Afton's og Springtrap suit would have been badly damaged from the FNAF 3 fire.
No wonder why your voice sounded familiar I watch ur jw videos
I think we know that scrap trap is jimmy neutron
It was confirmed by Scott after people complained about bugs, he said it was part of the hallucinations when there was a certain error (I think it was Ventilation) a 2nd fake Springtrap would appear. This creates the theory the reason all the phantoms have the same eyes as Springtrap is because he controls them with duplicate Springtrap just adding
I think that Fredbear should've been named Spring freddy
I got here a 19 minutes and 302 views OMGGGGggg
IF william somehow possessed the other spring Bonnie suit (scraptrap) then what happend to the other spring Bonnie suit (spring trap) did he just leave it or do something with it? Did he re-use that suit and that's how we got burntrap? That's just my theory. After help wanted his soul re-enteted the real world and possessed the spring trap suit and he turned into burntrap. Coud be a possibility
He must be cloning
Scraptrap has to be Afton. It’s literally his name in fnaf 6. Also, he’s British, and so is Michael. And pretty much everyone agrees that Michael is William’s son
i honestly dont fully think this theory is true because the other failures in the springlock suits at fredbears are the shadows they got the short end of the stick and turned into the shadow creatures
What are the odds of having 2 differents persons each in a spring lock bunny theme suit ?
There’s only 1 springtrap
At most you can possibly say that the mimic was possessed by him and become a somewhat another springtrap
Springtrap can Shadow Clon
HEAR ME OUT.. this man who apparently got stuffed/springlocked in an other springlock suit, he got springlocked in not the same springbonnie suit as william's cause we can see it looks ALOT more different, it has the scraptrap suit but my theory is that after fnaf's 3 fire springtrap with his broken suit removed what he could and got back to the old fredbear's family diner and he gets off the scraptrap suit that was on that man that died in the fnaf 4 minigame but he couldnt have gotten springlocked in that scraptrap like suit, because if he did got springlocked the helmet would've been stuck on his head as we all sall william put the suit's head on him, so my theory is that the guy just got killed and then stuffed inside this unwithered scraptrap suit was left to die and since that scraptrap suit was shaped like toy bonnie the dead stuffed guy became shadow bonnie's soul, and after fnaf 3, 32years after, burnt and damaged springtrap goes back to fredbear's diner where he finds that suit with the dead corpse inside it, and the man probably didnt possesed that suit since william extracted his remnant before he could attach it to the suit and posses it like the others, so william just let the corpse here and since the springlocks werent off, he just gently slided the suit off of the guy and putted it on looking like scraptrap and having a toy bonnie jaw like and head like!! hope i get some likes for all this writing and an answer if am wrong or right or anything shoulc change!! THKS FOR READIN!!!!
I got here 35 mins ago!
Just for a couple more water and he will split into pieces
so, if this theory is right, were is the second springtrap in the sb timeline?
Later Today I'll be able to join as a Member! I'll edit the Comment when I have!
Edit : As I said I would, I have became a Member!
LEGENDARY!!
@@TwistedAnimatronic Done!
@@WilliamplaysOfficial Absolute legend!
@@TwistedAnimatronic It's the Least I could do, I would've done more if I could but sadly I could only become a Golden Twisted One I apprieciate all the Theories and continue to watch every last one of them as much as I can!
Edit : Only just realized I have these 2 little guys :
Because he's not always come back!!!!!
Why dus buntrep look different than spring and straptrep?!?
4
Pit Trap was a Agony Manifested Memory,
That was Able to Exit into the Real world
But i Question How he was Able to Aquire the illusion Tech to appear as Ozwold's Father.
And We Find out that Oz is
in the Same Scenario,
Being a Machine himself
Mabey Pit Spring bonnie got Help from Elanour.
Or was a Construction made by Elanour to Cause more Agony than what already Happened.
Pit Spring Bonnie Was Using illusion Disk Tech to Appear as the Dad.
Does not have a animatronic for the dog
Nope that guy is not scraptrap because that past suit was too fat
Is it wrong I like spring trap fnaf 3 design it look far more graphic and disturbing
6 Minuit gang
what about burntrap
no it's the vedat
👍
Under 1 day gang
👇
Pitrap is afton X C0ke bear
hi
Fazgoo
I know this series is convoluted, but even this feels a bit far for Scott 😅 Not to mention most theories don’t really have room for a second springtrap to exist. This feels like the beginning of shoving squares in circular pegs.
1
TH-cam
Why do people bring up the books for these theories when we all know the first four games have nothing to do with and didn't take into account of the books bro literally smashing together lore that doesn't correlate