remember to be extremely careful running custom ISOs like this, there is always the risk of build in malware/spyware that may even be invisible to antivirus because its so deeply embedded. best practice is to modify your own ISO, there are many free and open source tools to do this yourself easily!!
Two issues/annotations i have with general "showcases" of OS-Builds of most sorts: 1) You as the Reviewer cant really make an educated suggestion on if it is something worth using if its just run in a VM for a few minutes or even an hour. By just running it in a VM you CANT figure out how well it performs and where it fails to live up to expectations. And i dont mean "smaller number in taskmanager go BRRRRR" here, I mean "is it able to run most workloads you throw at it without throwing a hissyfit every 5 minutes", like for example in your case recording a video, writing a script and printing it, cutting and rendering the video, gaming with and without Anticheats, how well does talking and streaming via Discord work,... your everyday-tasks essentially. For example a Windowsbuild that is cut down to 50 processes will probably boot and run really fast (if it boots at all, that is) but it will fail to run basically everything you try to run on it. And especially if the issues are not immideatly visible, they will probably pop up over the first week or two or even a month in, but you as the Reviewer will never experience that because you never even used it. Think of it as looking at a car and rating it despite never having driven it. 2) By just running it in a VM, you implicitly suggest to me that you dont trust it enough to be fine with running it on bare metal for a while and actually using it as the OS you do your work on, so why show it to me to begin with, if you yourself are not trusting it? That being said, these 2 general issues apply to 99% of OS-Showoffs on this entire platform, so thats not criticism to you personally, but could be a suggestion on how to stand out from the rest.
And this is still disregarding the issue of "you have no idea if your PC is doing something in the background it is not supposed to" because you as the user have no idea what the Distributor changed in for example the registry.
wow last time i watched this channel was more than 2 months ago! since when did you get a new PC and decide to install windows instead of that linux distro you had?
I know it sounds shocking considering I love Linux to death. I still love it. Linux I think will be the future of operating systems. Heck it's already seen a ton of growth. However, in current day at least for my uses, I realized that unfortunately there are just a lot of programs that I need that only run in Windows, like the Pikmin modding tools I use, Irfanview, and Anvil Studio just as a few examples. "Well can't you use WINE?" Yes but it's super buggy and I've had so many issues with running these programs in Linux. Also it's not guaranteed that the program you want to run will run with WINE. "What about a VM?" I did use a Windows 10 VM for a long time actually but I decided to delete it since it was taking up a lot of hard drive space. Plus it was just getting tiresome for me. Does this mean I'm going back to Windows forever? Hell No! For me at least, it's only until developers start developing on Linux more and their is more support that I would permanantly switch back. I'm not saying Linux is bad, nor am I saying Windows is better. Windows has it's own problems. But programs I need run best in Windows as of this moment which sucks.
@@twistyjoygaming422 I've tried Linux but I found that it's just not for me as I don't find deleting all the bloat annoying in Windows. Stuff I liked on Linux though is the customizability as it is open and you can do anything you want to it, who knows, if there is new software like wine but better without the extreme hassle needed to get Windows software to run, maybe but just maybe I'll switch!
Yeah. It's a shame too because it's like a trade off when using Arch or Debian. Debian is more stable but is less bleeding edge so new hardware won't work as good. Arch has more programs you could install, but it's unstable.
@@twistyjoygaming422 Fedora is a great middleground. It has the benefit of being supported by RedHat, a Company that is also a Server-Linux-Distributor (RHEL, Redhat Enterprise Linux) and is also not too far behind the current versions of most packages, unlike Debian or Ubuntu LTS. That being said: Unstable doesnt mean Unreliable. "Unstable" in the Linuxspace just means things are constantly changing but that does not mean an unstable distro is unreliable by default. It would only become unreliable if you as the user mindlessly click "accept" instead of reading what it is asking you, but that would not be a Issue of Arch but a User-Issue. I do however acknowledge that Arch takes a bit more of a handson-approach for getting it to run than most other Distros (for example the Installation is usually done by manually editing configfiles and running commands one by one) but apart from that it works just as well as any other Linuxdistribution and it will break the same way as any other Linuxdistro if you treat it badly: If you (similar to LTT-Linus' Mishap with PopOS) just blindly run commands, your OS will implode for sure but if you read what it is saying you can probably say "wait stop, this is not what i had in mind, why does it want to do something i wasnt intending to, what did i miss?" And if you are one of those that are like "Commandline scary D:", i can assure you for 90% of functions you would run in the Commandline there is a tool that will do it via the GUI and as long as you take 5 minutes to google, you will probably find it.
What would the benefits of running something like this be? my immediate assumption is that this is great for people who want to get way from microsoft’s trackers and bloat, but aren’t willing to switch to linux. What would be the difference between this and a linux distro that mimics windows in look and feel? Would things like windows-specific drivers and anticheats still work on here with all the things that have been stripped out?
Kernel OS will integrate advanced anticheats and optimizations, offering better performance compared to standard Windows. It'll bring Linux-like efficiency while maintaining full compatibility with all your essential Windows apps, games, and software. You won't need to sacrifice any of your favorite programs, ensuring a seamless experience with the best of both worlds.
subscribed because of your quality content. Keep up the good work and continue doing you
Good to see people are still modding the windows kernel since the 98SE Buu kernel.
underrated
thanks for doing my idea
remember to be extremely careful running custom ISOs like this, there is always the risk of build in malware/spyware that may even be invisible to antivirus because its so deeply embedded. best practice is to modify your own ISO, there are many free and open source tools to do this yourself easily!!
isn't that what Microsoft already do
@@senexs2955 the difference being with micropeepee-provided spyware you know where your data goes
@@senexs2955 yup. Biggest spyware package is Windows 11
Two issues/annotations i have with general "showcases" of OS-Builds of most sorts:
1) You as the Reviewer cant really make an educated suggestion on if it is something worth using if its just run in a VM for a few minutes or even an hour. By just running it in a VM you CANT figure out how well it performs and where it fails to live up to expectations. And i dont mean "smaller number in taskmanager go BRRRRR" here, I mean "is it able to run most workloads you throw at it without throwing a hissyfit every 5 minutes", like for example in your case recording a video, writing a script and printing it, cutting and rendering the video, gaming with and without Anticheats, how well does talking and streaming via Discord work,... your everyday-tasks essentially.
For example a Windowsbuild that is cut down to 50 processes will probably boot and run really fast (if it boots at all, that is) but it will fail to run basically everything you try to run on it. And especially if the issues are not immideatly visible, they will probably pop up over the first week or two or even a month in, but you as the Reviewer will never experience that because you never even used it. Think of it as looking at a car and rating it despite never having driven it.
2) By just running it in a VM, you implicitly suggest to me that you dont trust it enough to be fine with running it on bare metal for a while and actually using it as the OS you do your work on, so why show it to me to begin with, if you yourself are not trusting it?
That being said, these 2 general issues apply to 99% of OS-Showoffs on this entire platform, so thats not criticism to you personally, but could be a suggestion on how to stand out from the rest.
And this is still disregarding the issue of "you have no idea if your PC is doing something in the background it is not supposed to" because you as the user have no idea what the Distributor changed in for example the registry.
WHAT YOUR SO UNDERATED WHAT THE
wow last time i watched this channel was more than 2 months ago! since when did you get a new PC and decide to install windows instead of that linux distro you had?
I know it sounds shocking considering I love Linux to death. I still love it. Linux I think will be the future of operating systems. Heck it's already seen a ton of growth. However, in current day at least for my uses, I realized that unfortunately there are just a lot of programs that I need that only run in Windows, like the Pikmin modding tools I use, Irfanview, and Anvil Studio just as a few examples. "Well can't you use WINE?" Yes but it's super buggy and I've had so many issues with running these programs in Linux. Also it's not guaranteed that the program you want to run will run with WINE. "What about a VM?" I did use a Windows 10 VM for a long time actually but I decided to delete it since it was taking up a lot of hard drive space. Plus it was just getting tiresome for me. Does this mean I'm going back to Windows forever? Hell No! For me at least, it's only until developers start developing on Linux more and their is more support that I would permanantly switch back. I'm not saying Linux is bad, nor am I saying Windows is better. Windows has it's own problems. But programs I need run best in Windows as of this moment which sucks.
@@twistyjoygaming422 I've tried Linux but I found that it's just not for me as I don't find deleting all the bloat annoying in Windows. Stuff I liked on Linux though is the customizability as it is open and you can do anything you want to it, who knows, if there is new software like wine but better without the extreme hassle needed to get Windows software to run, maybe but just maybe I'll switch!
BTW on Windows just use HyperV, generally has better performance than virtual box
linux works amazing on some distros. but if u use arch or gentoo its really more of a do it ur self kinda thing
Yeah. It's a shame too because it's like a trade off when using Arch or Debian. Debian is more stable but is less bleeding edge so new hardware won't work as good. Arch has more programs you could install, but it's unstable.
@@twistyjoygaming422 Fedora is a great middleground. It has the benefit of being supported by RedHat, a Company that is also a Server-Linux-Distributor (RHEL, Redhat Enterprise Linux) and is also not too far behind the current versions of most packages, unlike Debian or Ubuntu LTS.
That being said: Unstable doesnt mean Unreliable. "Unstable" in the Linuxspace just means things are constantly changing but that does not mean an unstable distro is unreliable by default. It would only become unreliable if you as the user mindlessly click "accept" instead of reading what it is asking you, but that would not be a Issue of Arch but a User-Issue.
I do however acknowledge that Arch takes a bit more of a handson-approach for getting it to run than most other Distros (for example the Installation is usually done by manually editing configfiles and running commands one by one) but apart from that it works just as well as any other Linuxdistribution and it will break the same way as any other Linuxdistro if you treat it badly: If you (similar to LTT-Linus' Mishap with PopOS) just blindly run commands, your OS will implode for sure but if you read what it is saying you can probably say "wait stop, this is not what i had in mind, why does it want to do something i wasnt intending to, what did i miss?"
And if you are one of those that are like "Commandline scary D:", i can assure you for 90% of functions you would run in the Commandline there is a tool that will do it via the GUI and as long as you take 5 minutes to google, you will probably find it.
i want to play xbox game pass games does it have ?
0:53 cores in VBox are threads... so 4 "cores" are actually 4 threads which bsically means you gave it 2 cores with 4 threads
subscribed, definatly thinking of switching my main computer to kernel OS
If you need trojans, keyloggers and info stealer than its the perfect OS for you.
Better go with a linux distro mate, you cant trust nobody with proprietary software
What would the benefits of running something like this be? my immediate assumption is that this is great for people who want to get way from microsoft’s trackers and bloat, but aren’t willing to switch to linux. What would be the difference between this and a linux distro that mimics windows in look and feel? Would things like windows-specific drivers and anticheats still work on here with all the things that have been stripped out?
I imagine some people want a faster debloated os, but need to use specific programs that dont work on Linux etc
Kernel OS will integrate advanced anticheats and optimizations, offering better performance compared to standard Windows. It'll bring Linux-like efficiency while maintaining full compatibility with all your essential Windows apps, games, and software. You won't need to sacrifice any of your favorite programs, ensuring a seamless experience with the best of both worlds.
@@juicy_zayyyou forgor to mention the possibility of a keylogger or anything like that build directly into the kernel so its invisible =)