This was a wonderful character study: Mr. Gardar Thor Cortes loves the character and is willing (as a performer) to open himself up to the darker emotions the Phantom must embody. I truly enjoy "Love Never Dies"...I only regret that I never got to see this actor's interpretation of the role.
His unmasked face is shown so briefly in this production, I think they found it unnecessary to have all the same prosthetics and makeup as in the original.
That really makes sense, but it is still very strange. I think for the Australian version they went all out on the prosthetic for Ramin Karimloo. I can't remember what they did for Ben Lewis.
lele10814 Ramin wasn't in the Australian cast. But yeah, they went all out on him. I feel like I remember that Ben Lewis didn't have much, if any, disfigured makeup. I'd have to sit through that mess again to see
I believe that the scars have used less makeup is to show that he is not an anti-hero or villain in this story but rather a hero in some ways as in he’s softened
Me too! Saw the show yesterday and still can’t believe that I finally got to see it! It’s kind of special knowing that I got to see the show before it goes to Broadway (it better have a Broadway run)!
@@amberpage7936 he has never played the Phantom in POTO. He was due to play him in the french language premiere in Paris (with Sierra) after leaving LND in Germany for the part (and she left broadway school of rock for it), but the theater burnt down a week before opening and the production never played. Ironic... but sad. He's only played Raoul in the West End and Passarino for the 25th London special.
Wow... The transformation.. The moment that tux coat was worn and he begins to walk, I'm seeing Erik right away. I'm in love with the Phantom. The Phantom is the best male broadway character of all time for me.💜
Everyone sitting around me loved.it. I believe the score has been tightened up quite a bit. Staging was improved, especially Beneath a Moonless Sky - so ridiculous singing a love duet separated across the room. Much more emphasis on their love, and it made the ending even harder.
I've had a sort of love/ hate relationship with the show from the first time I became aware of it, but I think the new cast recording helped land me more firmly in the pro- LND camp.
Although I do prefer Ben Lewis as the Phantom, I cannot deny that Gardar Thor Cortes embodies the Phantom perfectly, especially in Love Never Dies because he is so mature and powerful. Perfect casting.
I am a child who fell in love with the Phantom of the Opera at the age of 2. Several years later, there was a sequel called Love Never Dies, and I had to see it. The music was beautiful, the Phantom was back, Christine had a son that was my age, and it was in New York. It just went on a 2017 US tour starring Gardar Thor Cortez and I could not say in words how excited I was to see it. It just came to where I lived and the run at the local theater ended recently. I didn't get to see the show. I was heartbroken because although it is still not as good as the original, it holds a sentimental place in my heart. I am so upset that I didn't get to see the show, and since it is not on Broadway and the chance of a tour in 1 one-in-a-million, I genuinely cried because I might not get to see the show live unless by any chance MAYBE it goes on tour again. I love the Phantom of the Opera so much, and I will say it, I even love this show too. But now the tour has moved to another state, so I guess that was that. I hope it was a great show and everybody in it did amazing!!! I'm sure they did!!!!
If Andrew Lloyd Webber had thought of the idea sooner, then we might have gotten Michael Crawford to return to the role of the Phantom. I would still like to hear Michael perform “Till I Hear You Sing.”
Just saw him in Los Angeles he was ABSOLUTELY PHENOMENAL. I don’t cry in theatre but in “Til I Hear You Sing” I got teary eyes. Him and Megan as Christine and Sean as Raoul were absolutely magnificent. I didn’t except to be so moved by a show.
Saw the show Friday night in Greenville, SC. Unfortunately Gardar's understudy was playing the Phantom that night so I didn't get to hear *him* sing :( The understudy, Michael Willis I believe his name was, was awesome though, so if he was that amazing as the understudy I can only imagine how good Mr. Cortes is. I love his respect for the complexity of the character.
Nobody Interesting I can't tell if you're being serious or you're joking his prosthetics are terrible it looks as though the makeup artist close her eyes kind of felt around and just guessed where it went and yes I understand that it's only seen for 5 minutes out of the entire show but this show is grandiose and big so every aspect should be grandiose and big including the Phantom's makeup and it's just terrible...and i know what your thinking well what qualifies you to know what's better and what's not well I am a trained makeup artist professional have done the Phantom makeup before and it looked 10 times better than this garbage
Forgive me for my ignorance. Well, I am not a professional makeup artist unlike you so my standards may be a bit different than yours. But believe me, for a girl who has 0% knowledge about makeup, this is kinda amazing.
If you thought this make-up is good, you look at the make-up they use in the original Phantom show, it's incredible. This one looks cool, but you don't actually see it properly in the show, whereas in Phantom it's in full view. He has a massive crater in his head with some brain sticking out. It's great stuff if you love prosthetics.
I have seen the Phantom's makeup in the original show and I compared it with this and, honestly, I thought both were amazing. I know you must be thinking that I am blind or whatever but.... that's just my opinion about the Phantom's makeup.
Saw him perform today. It was tricky to understand what he was saying due to his vibrato, and I knew the lyrics to all the songs. The performance was certainly enjoyable, though.
to everyone making comments on the makeup, his face is seen for a brief 2 seconds so why would they take the time to do as much work into it as the original show where you see his face in multiple scenes/songs?
I'm a couple years late, but they didn't go full out with phantom's deformity in this show because the makeup is briefly shown once in the entire show.
Emiliaaa It may look like this since he's only briefly shown without the mask in the show and therefore there's no need for a large amount of prosthetics/makeup.
One of the changes made in the restaged Australian production was no actual reveal of his face. This was kept in the Stockholm version and now this US tour. In the original London version the full deformity was shown, it looked the same as in the first Phantom show.
The show works when you see it live ! Not in DVD ! I hated the DVD I loved it when I saw it in San Diego last year ! I even went a second time !! It was very powerfull and moving , although I don’t think it as a sequel for phantom ...( characters like the Girys don’t make sens with the original) I think it more of an alternate reality of what may have happened.
U also have to remember that it has to be big and bold enough for audience members in the gods to see clearly. And as others have said, u don't see it much anyway.
D Mc it had potential. But the part where they show that Christine and Phantom had a son doesn’t exactly follow the timeline of Christine’s life that Andrew Lloyd Webber created in 2005. Even her death didn’t match up with it either. It was as if after the premier for The Phantom of The Opera 2005 film, Webber had a little too much to drink during the After Party and said to the producers “I got an excellent idea... What if, Christine and Erik were able to have a kid before Raoul rescued her (since it was after the rescue that the opera house was on fire), and ten years later Raoul is a total jerk face, Erik is manipulative again.”
Ana Sofía and even considering the timeline of the original stage show, there's no way 10 years later is 1906 (not sure if they kept that date in this production, that's what the original london one used). The original takes place around 1881, as it's late Victorian, and then jumps to 1906 in the sequel?? So many plot holes... how would Christine have been able to find him? The girys didn't know him, how/why would they help him? Raoul can't be the father cause the kid is musical??? His mom is an opera singer!!! Ugh. It has some nice music but the plot is just awful and really disregards the original. I saw the original london production and, while it seems the sets and costumes have mostly improved (or at least become more flashy), the story has not at all
I could listen to him talk for hours! so soothing and calm !
His voice is so sweet and gentle. I can hear him talk all day and night.
This was a wonderful character study: Mr. Gardar Thor Cortes loves the character and is willing (as a performer) to open himself up to the darker emotions the Phantom must embody. I truly enjoy "Love Never Dies"...I only regret that I never got to see this actor's interpretation of the role.
his voice is so soothing omg
You should do a character study for Dimitri (Derek Klena) on Anastasia!
Yes I would love to see one from Ramin before he leaves the show!
They should do one for all of the main cast
It's weird that there is less makeup/prosthetics for the phantom. I love seeing the evolution of his scars throughout the years.
His unmasked face is shown so briefly in this production, I think they found it unnecessary to have all the same prosthetics and makeup as in the original.
another possibility is maybe somehow in these 10 years, the phantom's scarring has somehow healed over?? a bit of a stretch XD
That really makes sense, but it is still very strange. I think for the Australian version they went all out on the prosthetic for Ramin Karimloo. I can't remember what they did for Ben Lewis.
lele10814 Ramin wasn't in the Australian cast. But yeah, they went all out on him. I feel like I remember that Ben Lewis didn't have much, if any, disfigured makeup. I'd have to sit through that mess again to see
I believe that the scars have used less makeup is to show that he is not an anti-hero or villain in this story but rather a hero in some ways as in he’s softened
This man needs to find time to do ASMR. my god.
Y E S
Y E S x2
I've been waiting 8 years for this tour and I seriously never thought it was going to happen
Hot Chocolate With Luna honestly me too
Me too! Saw the show yesterday and still can’t believe that I finally got to see it! It’s kind of special knowing that I got to see the show before it goes to Broadway (it better have a Broadway run)!
It was worth the wait!
I saw it yesterday it was AMAZING!!
I saw at panteges
He should play the phantom on broadway. He’s the type of voice I want to play phantom: operatic tenor
Navid Namini I think he has done. Idk.
@Amber Page I don't believe he's starred on Broadway yet. And he has not played the Phantom in POTO, either. He did, however, play Raoul in London
@@amberpage7936 he has never played the Phantom in POTO. He was due to play him in the french language premiere in Paris (with Sierra) after leaving LND in Germany for the part (and she left broadway school of rock for it), but the theater burnt down a week before opening and the production never played. Ironic... but sad. He's only played Raoul in the West End and Passarino for the 25th London special.
nala beans that’s really interesting, I didn’t know that! Spooky hat the theatre burnt down!😂
Wow... The transformation.. The moment that tux coat was worn and he begins to walk, I'm seeing Erik right away. I'm in love with the Phantom. The Phantom is the best male broadway character of all time for me.💜
Love Never Dies has such terrible writing but yet I love it
Katie Tucker I know 🙈 I'm the same.
Everyone sitting around me loved.it. I believe the score has been tightened up quite a bit. Staging was improved, especially Beneath a Moonless Sky - so ridiculous singing a love duet separated across the room. Much more emphasis on their love, and it made the ending even harder.
Screw you
I've had a sort of love/ hate relationship with the show from the first time I became aware of it, but I think the new cast recording helped land me more firmly in the pro- LND camp.
Katie Tucker it wasn’t originally
this dude has SUCH a soothing voice!!! record some audiobooks please
Although I do prefer Ben Lewis as the Phantom, I cannot deny that Gardar Thor Cortes embodies the Phantom perfectly, especially in Love Never Dies because he is so mature and powerful. Perfect casting.
Mari Sanchez
He was Raoul in 1999.
I am a child who fell in love with the Phantom of the Opera at the age of 2. Several years later, there was a sequel called Love Never Dies, and I had to see it. The music was beautiful, the Phantom was back, Christine had a son that was my age, and it was in New York. It just went on a 2017 US tour starring Gardar Thor Cortez and I could not say in words how excited I was to see it. It just came to where I lived and the run at the local theater ended recently. I didn't get to see the show. I was heartbroken because although it is still not as good as the original, it holds a sentimental place in my heart. I am so upset that I didn't get to see the show, and since it is not on Broadway and the chance of a tour in 1 one-in-a-million, I genuinely cried because I might not get to see the show live unless by any chance MAYBE it goes on tour again. I love the Phantom of the Opera so much, and I will say it, I even love this show too. But now the tour has moved to another state, so I guess that was that. I hope it was a great show and everybody in it did amazing!!! I'm sure they did!!!!
He has such a beautiful voice :’)
He has a rich heritage behind him
Saw Gardar in Germany playing "Love never dies" he was STUNNING! And I was so happy to see this video
If Andrew Lloyd Webber had thought of the idea sooner, then we might have gotten Michael Crawford to return to the role of the Phantom. I would still like to hear Michael perform “Till I Hear You Sing.”
This man has an amazing name!!
I am so glad to have met him he's such a talented and genuinely great person!
Gardar summed up the Phantom perfectly
His little voice is so sweet!
I had the privilege to see his understudy Bronson in Detroit, what a terrific voice and show!
Hayley Pulizzi Same! Such a great show!
Me too!
~:~
Ahh hey fellow Michigan theatre fan
Yes, had the privilege of seeing Bronson twice in Detroit and he was phenomenal.....blew me away.
I want to see him preform but he’s not on for the day I’m going
This man has a fabulous singing voice. Just fabulous
And this is why...love never dies needs to be on broadway
His voice is so soothing!
Just saw him in Los Angeles he was ABSOLUTELY PHENOMENAL. I don’t cry in theatre but in “Til I Hear You Sing” I got teary eyes. Him and Megan as Christine and Sean as Raoul were absolutely magnificent. I didn’t except to be so moved by a show.
Amazing how he hasn’t done the original POTO production on Broadway or west end. He would be amazing
I CAN'T. FREAKING. WAIT. TO SEE THIS LIVE!!!!
HIS VOICE IS SO BEAUTIFUL
He's so calm and soothing I wonder how he also does the opposite with the phantom
Gardar's voice is just fantastic it just is
He understands this character so much😍😍
I’ve been a fan of Gardar for years. So happy to see him featured here.
When people say they don’t like the new love never dies I point them directly to this video.
I saw this live, it was amazing. Set was gorgeous, cast was great, and I got a mug! A freaking mug! Hell yeah!
I love listening to him.
I saw him in Hamburg as the main Phantom in LND and he was beautiful, what a voice!
Just saw him yesterday. He was awesome!
I saw him live as the phantom he is amazing! The entire cast I saw in Utica did fantastic.
Incredible performance! Thank you! Saw it last night. Now I want to watch it again and again.
His voice!!
I saw this on New Year’s Eve with him playing Phantom! It was AMAZING
Love it! Cannot wait to see him live!
He was so amazing tonight!
Saw the show Friday night in Greenville, SC. Unfortunately Gardar's understudy was playing the Phantom that night so I didn't get to hear *him* sing :( The understudy, Michael Willis I believe his name was, was awesome though, so if he was that amazing as the understudy I can only imagine how good Mr. Cortes is. I love his respect for the complexity of the character.
The makeup artists and stylists of his musical are areally brillant! God those prosthetics are amazing!
Nobody Interesting I can't tell if you're being serious or you're joking his prosthetics are terrible it looks as though the makeup artist close her eyes kind of felt around and just guessed where it went and yes I understand that it's only seen for 5 minutes out of the entire show but this show is grandiose and big so every aspect should be grandiose and big including the Phantom's makeup and it's just terrible...and i know what your thinking well what qualifies you to know what's better and what's not well I am a trained makeup artist professional have done the Phantom makeup before and it looked 10 times better than this garbage
Forgive me for my ignorance. Well, I am not a professional makeup artist unlike you so my standards may be a bit different than yours. But believe me, for a girl who has 0% knowledge about makeup, this is kinda amazing.
If you thought this make-up is good, you look at the make-up they use in the original Phantom show, it's incredible. This one looks cool, but you don't actually see it properly in the show, whereas in Phantom it's in full view. He has a massive crater in his head with some brain sticking out. It's great stuff if you love prosthetics.
I have seen the Phantom's makeup in the original show and I compared it with this and, honestly, I thought both were amazing. I know you must be thinking that I am blind or whatever but.... that's just my opinion about the Phantom's makeup.
this persons voice is so soft it's amazing
Out of all of the underrated/ retired phantoms, I'd love to see either Hugh Panaro or Peter Joback, come back to play the phantom in LND!!!!
You should do a character study for Earl in Waitress
Carpenter?
I cannot wait till I get to see this!!!!!
That guy is pretty cool as the Phantom!
I love his accent!
He is Amazing! 👌🏻
Saw him perform today. It was tricky to understand what he was saying due to his vibrato, and I knew the lyrics to all the songs. The performance was certainly enjoyable, though.
Please do a hamilton character study!
This play it's good but it's nothing like the actual phantom of the opera.
Ale_Luna 0906 it’s been 10 years
Ale_Luna 0906 it’s not supposed to be
ten..long....years! sorry Phangirling here! lol
If you want to watch Phantom of the Opera, just watch Phantom of the Opera though. A sequel ought to bring something new to the table.
I saw him at the panteges 2018
I want to meet This Guy as the Phantom for my Birthday on the 14th in December.
I LOVE THIS
Saw the show in Vegas
to everyone making comments on the makeup, his face is seen for a brief 2 seconds so why would they take the time to do as much work into it as the original show where you see his face in multiple scenes/songs?
Does the thing they put on his head before they put the wig on to give it more height and volume?
AAAAAAAAH i clicked that like button before i even watched a second
I don’t really enjoy the music of this, but the storyline is perfection.
I'm a simple girl who clicked for the thumbnail.... plus I Lowkey love the broadway.
Quick question, what the hell is up with the makeup
The phantom (erik) has a damaged face which is why he gets upset when people take off his mask because he doesn't like showing it
@musical theater nerd I think the question is, why is it face paint makeup and not the latex stuff?
@@scotthamp384 with the money that erik got from phantasma and the girys apparently he had his face redone to look better, so here we are.
I'm a couple years late, but they didn't go full out with phantom's deformity in this show because the makeup is briefly shown once in the entire show.
Ok. What other roles can you see him playing?
He was Raoul in West end.
he’s so hot no cap
No
You should do someone from the Book of Mormon!
Could you do a character study for someone in Charlie and the Chocolate Factory?
YAYAYAYAYAYYAYA
YESSSSSSS
The hottest phantom ever!!! Except for Michael Crawford, lol!
This phantom makeup looks nothing like the original face.... its suppose to be a disfunction, not a scar?
Emiliaaa It may look like this since he's only briefly shown without the mask in the show and therefore there's no need for a large amount of prosthetics/makeup.
Caylee Beaver Ahh okey!
One of the changes made in the restaged Australian production was no actual reveal of his face. This was kept in the Stockholm version and now this US tour. In the original London version the full deformity was shown, it looked the same as in the first Phantom show.
Julius Thome yeah my fault, it was Hamburg, I got mixed up with another show.
Ilove you somuch miss
He kinda looks like Christian bale
😍😍
The show works when you see it live ! Not in DVD ! I hated the DVD I loved it when I saw it in San Diego last year !
I even went a second time !! It was very powerfull and moving , although I don’t think it as a sequel for phantom ...( characters like the Girys don’t make sens with the original) I think it more of an alternate reality of what may have happened.
Give me the DVD, will you.
anyone gonna say that his mask is on the wrong side? If you don’t believe me watch or look at some photos.?
Is that the same mask he wore in Germany?
It was built based on the one he wore in Germany, yes.
I had his understudy :(
Michelle Betman How was he?
missmpv his understudy was awesome
Ummm the deformity is supposed to be on the other side! Does nobody realize this? 😨
Brennen Cabrera
You're looking at the mirror.
I mean you aren't that close to the actors In the musical so I guess the makeup doesn't matter as much?
So he had some plastic surgeries, I see.
Yeesh... That makeup is awful.
I've seen high schoolers in Halloween costumes with better makeup than this major National Tour with Andrew Lloyd Webber footing the bill
You hardly see the makeup in the show, so it'd be pointless to do more. This look actually sells the effect really well when you're seeing it live.
I agree
You hardly see the makeup in Phantom of the Opera, and the makeup for that looks a million times better.
U also have to remember that it has to be big and bold enough for audience members in the gods to see clearly. And as others have said, u don't see it much anyway.
He makeup is not as good as the original
Juz4Fun Vid
He supposed to be looking better. He's filthy rich and he could have some plastic surgeries to his face.
Well maybe it’s not paint because it’s a tour so it’s hard to keep latex good for years
An actor so wasted on love never dies
I have never seen a worse make-up even by my worst student 🤮
Very messy make-up
Shit. It's shit.
I wish this was a better show.
D Mc it had potential. But the part where they show that Christine and Phantom had a son doesn’t exactly follow the timeline of Christine’s life that Andrew Lloyd Webber created in 2005. Even her death didn’t match up with it either. It was as if after the premier for The Phantom of The Opera 2005 film, Webber had a little too much to drink during the After Party and said to the producers “I got an excellent idea... What if, Christine and Erik were able to have a kid before Raoul rescued her (since it was after the rescue that the opera house was on fire), and ten years later Raoul is a total jerk face, Erik is manipulative again.”
Ana Sofía and even considering the timeline of the original stage show, there's no way 10 years later is 1906 (not sure if they kept that date in this production, that's what the original london one used). The original takes place around 1881, as it's late Victorian, and then jumps to 1906 in the sequel??
So many plot holes... how would Christine have been able to find him? The girys didn't know him, how/why would they help him? Raoul can't be the father cause the kid is musical??? His mom is an opera singer!!! Ugh. It has some nice music but the plot is just awful and really disregards the original. I saw the original london production and, while it seems the sets and costumes have mostly improved (or at least become more flashy), the story has not at all