Install Raid for Free ✅ IOS: clcr.me/Oct_KingsGs_ios ✅ ANDROID: clcr.me/Oct_KingsGs_Android ✅ PC: clcr.me/Oct_KingsGs_PC and get a special starter pack 💥Available only for the next 30 days
Not really. A caliphate just means it’s ruled by a caliph. A sort of king religious figure. Caliphates could be small or large. Just like empires. For instance Germany today was once called the German Empire even though it had always been known as Germany and was made up of several kings in that one empire. Same can be said for America. It could be considered an Empire just bc of all the separate states make it up.
The Ghaznavid dynasty was a Muslim Dynasty of Turkic mamluk origin, at their greatest extent ruling large parts of Iran, Afghanistan, much of Transoxiana and the northwest Indian subcontinent from 977 to 1186. Turks everywhere....
It's not that I disagree, but I think that what sounds cool depends on what your native language is. If a set of sounds are commonly used in your daily life, they probably loose their coolness as the novelty wears off.
Tegin means “ancestor” in Kyrgyz language, which define your identity and to which family person belongs, and tegin word is still used in modern kyrgyz language.
And Alptegin is also a characteristic name for Kyrgyz people since Alp means hero and warrior, and this name also used widely among turkic people as Alptegin, Alperen, Alper... ( kyrgyz people are one of the central asian turkic tribes)
Names ending with tegin/tigin is still common in Turkish. It is an honorary name basically meaning lord or prince. Sabuktegin=lord Sabuk, Alptegin=Lord Alp(yeah Alp is still used, see:my name)
I love the illustrations you guys use on your videos, too many channels just portray the localities of west and central Asia as being stereotypically Bedouin, but you guys actually put effort to portray the people, clothing, terrain, architecture and armor pretty spot on.
I had been meaning to do it for long years and managed at last in Kyrgyzistan. That was a great experience i would like to repeat. You feel freedom of nomads through your veins after some local drinks 😀
Its a land of warriors. No other region brought more warlords than central asia. Ghaznavid, Karakhanids, Seljuqi Khorezmiy Temuri Baburi Ottomans origins are also central asia. Anatolian Turks refers to central asia as “Atayurt” means fatherland. There are no ethnic groups who destroyed and built empires more than Turks. Even Gengiz khans army was 60-80% Turkic tribes.
@@1212-m6b The Ghaznavid became an empire and one of the mightiest empire in the world because of Mahmud of Ghazni . People always talk about Sabuktigin what they not tell is that Sabuktigin not want to rebel against the Persian Samanid . It was Mahmud who wanted to rebel against the Samanid . Sabuktin at his greatest controlled a minuscule patch of land , the Ghanavid territory under Sabuktigin was a jok it wasn't eve. independent lol . It was Mahmud who made the Ghaznavid an empire but also one of the most mighty . Mahmud is half-Persian by his mother side . He went to school with Persian and even his friend were Persian . One of his Persian school mate became a Vizier of the Ghaznavid empire . Mahmud was nicknamed "Mahmud of Zabulistan" because his Persian mother was from Zabulistan . Everyone agree that Sabuktigin was EXTREMELY weak compared to Mahmud . Everything great about the Ghaznavid was by Mahmud the half-Persian . Mahmud was more Persian than even the 100% Iranic Samanid . Under Mahmud's Ghaznavid empire the Persian culture was in a golden age . The Shanameh was completed . And Ferdowsi only say that Mahmud was Turk because Ferdowsi not like Mahmud because Mahmud not pay Ferdowsi in gold as promised . Because someone who not like Ferdowsi took the gold and instead put silver thus making Ferdowsi think Mahmud not want to pay him . Mahmud thinking Ferdowsi insults him by not taking the gold then order Ferdowsi to be executed . Ferdowsi run away and started saying that Mahmud was a Turk . When Mahmud know that someone changed the gold coin and put silver instead he knew he made a mistake and so he regretted and send gold to Ferdowsi but unfortunately Ferdowsi die before the gold and the apology of Mahmud arrive . Mahmud as a person was a Persian . His DNA is 50% Persian . Under him no Persian believe that they were rulled by a Turk . The Ghaznavid empire wasn't Turkish empire that subjugated Persian . It was a Persian / Iranian empire rulled by Mahmud a half Persian . Also even his father Sabuktigin claimed descend from the Sassanian Shah " " " "Sabuktigin, the son of Jukan, the son of Kuzil-Hukum, the son of Kuzil-Arslan, the son of Firuz, the son of Yezdijird, king of Persia." 🤣😂 Sabuktigin not care about Turk lol , he wanted to be Persian 🤣😂 . His son was Half-Persian . I don't know why Turks are proud of him or his son ? lol . Sabuktigin was a Turk who was loyal to the Iranian Samanid . Sabuktigin was extremely Persianized and even try to claim he was from the line of the Sassanian king . Sabuktigin not care about Turk lol he not even want to rebel against the Samanid . Sabuktigin didn't rule over an empire he was a governor of a small territory that was a vassal of the Samanid . The Ghanavid empire begun with Mahmud of Ghazni the half-Persian ( who is the son of a Persian woman who was a daughter of an Iranian aristocrat from Zabulistan ) not Sabuktigin . Sabuktigin work for the Samanid as was his master Alp-Tegin . Both Alp-Tegin and Sabuktigin were EXTREMELY loyal to the Persian Samanid . Both Alp-Tegin and Sabuktigin were EXTREMELY Persianisized and Iranisized . Why Turks proud of Alp-Tegin and Sabuktigin ? Sabuktigin always claim he was from Sassanian line because he proud of being an Iranian . Alp-Tegin loyaly work for the Samanid Persian . Funny both 100% Turk blood Alp-Tegin and Sabuktigin were 100% loyal to the Persian Samanid . It was Mahmud the half-Persian who create and build the greatest empire in the Islamic world not the Turks Sabuktigin or Alp-Tegin . Both Turks Alp Tegin and Sabuktigin were canine to the Persian Samanid . The half-Persian Mahmud of Ghazni deserve 100% of the praise , he was true Persian king who made Persian culture reach a golden age .
Thank you, your videos are really professional. I feel there are gaps in my knowledge of events from that part of the world (the 'stans' area), and your videos are really helpful in bridging that gap. A lot of emphasis in popular circles tends to be history of the mediterranian and levant region, so it is nice to see coverage of other areas of the world.
Here in the English and French speaking Americas, we were made to believe that it was the Franks, the Celtics and the Vikings who ruled the middle ages
It depends how you wish to look at it, the Turks achieved hegemony relatively quickly over Anatolia and much of the Middle East, and from the time of the Arab caliphate they’re wasn’t really another major power in the region until the mamlukes, who were relatively quickly dispatched by the Turkish hegemony. The Turks just didn’t really have a major rival in the area, whereas Europe for instance is tightly packed with many different peoples and rivalry’s, and has been since the first kingdoms there. Which drove constant technological advancements and the looking of new ways to do things, including new resources found overseas through colonies or trade, the latter of which eventually meant getting around Turkish taxes en route to China and India. The Turks had an amazing position that they managed to keep pacified for most of their rule, no major rival in the region, this gave them an amazing advantage, but also lead to their eventual stagnation, as they became trapped by their own position once everyone learned how to bypass them on the way to China and India, while they also remained out of reach of the new world. It’s really an incredible story about how they benefited from their situation but were also ultimately undone by it too, as a result its kind of hard to say who “ruled” the Middle Ages, you could just as easily say the same thing about the Chinese. The Turks and Chinese were similar in the fact they lacked region rivals, whereas Europe is essentially the opposite, a bunch of rivals keeping each other in check making sure none get too strong and can overpower the rest. Also if you had to pick a place to start your civilisation, you can’t do much better than Anatolia, Persia, northern/middle China and of course the US, hence why all those states became world superpowers at one point or another 🤔
I think it's a little misleading to say that slaves were the lowest in medieval society, especially Islamic Central Asia and South West Asia. You do bring it up later, but the military slaves like Ghulams and Mamelukes were above common freemen and would be for centuries to come. A similar system was in the Ottoman Empire with the Janissaries, and while legally they were slaves of the Sultan, they were most certainly above almost everyone else in the empire. Similarly in Rome, the Emperors personal slaves were often elevated, even at times talking down to prominent Senators. Of course, most slaves were not like that, but it's not inherent that slaves were at the bottom of society.
Although even then, I think the reason slaves were given such important jobs was because they had no power or influence except from what was given to them by their masters, so they couldn't easily start a rebellion, and could be killed without consequence if they started causing trouble.
@@iapetusmccool They did on multiple occasions though especially in Muslim empires. There's the two Mameluke dynasties, the Ghaznanavids and Muhammand Ali Pasha just to name a few.
@@TheDirtysouthfan Mohamed Ali even rounded up the mamluks after taking back Egypt from the French and killed them to avoid further rebellion in Salah Al Din’s Castle
@@iapetusmccool actually this wasn't the case most of the time. "Slave soldiers" in Abbasid Caliphate most of the time decided who to be caliph and held the real power. As in the video, Ghaznavids overthrew Samanids and in Egypt, Mamelukes overthrew Ayyubids. Even in Ottoman Empire, Jannisaries started many revolts which caused the change of the Sultan.
The Mamalik dynasty, were all slaves. An entire dynasty ruled Egypt, the Levint, and the Hejaz (the Holly cities of Mecca and Medina) were slaves. Ruling for 400 years
@@smilingcat9997 They are ok for a brief synopsis of events and stuff. But they only scratch the surface. I do like them of course but there's a lot better more in depth channels.
I don't know whether it is a coincidence or not, but your latest videos (from the last month or so) unintentionally revolve around topics I am reading about in this period. Good job, keep it up.
The mamluk(slave) dynasy ruled egypt and syria for 400 years,also ruled india. the slave of muhammad of ghour qutbuddin aibak was the first ruler of the dynasty
The Ghaznavid empire is one of the most underrated states its foundation marked the begin of a series of turkic states based in the iranian plateuau dynasties like seljuks,khwarezmids,ak and kara koyunlus,timurids,safavids,afsharids,qajars most of them contributed to the perso-turkic islamic culture even found in the indian subcontinent with delhi sultanate and mughals. Love your work btw 🙌🖤
@@klawson8617 actually I’m a Pashtun Afghan and I’ve done multiple DNA test, Pashtuns are nearest population to the skeleton remains found of Ghaznavid soldiers .. DNA evidence shows basically the modern population of Afghanistan being Pashtun, Tajik, Uzbek, Turkmen all have had a shared past through genetic research
@Persian Sounds I'm pashtun aswell. You're getting confused. Turkmen and Tajiks have merged with us throughout the centuries. Uzbeks are different. But saying we are the same as them is wrong. They assimilated into the dominant culture which was the Pashtun. Not the other way round
@@klawson8617 not from a genetic standpoint that is incorrect.. The proxy for purest Pashtun or nearest to the proto Pashtuns are Khandaris.. Genetically they have the highest Steppe ancestry or Iranic and lowest South Asian AASI which is around 8% .. Isolated Tajiks like Pamiris and Yaghnobis even Ishkashimi Tajiks have more Iranic ancestry than Pashtuns but these are minority amongst Tajiks .. The nearest people to Pashtuns are these high Iranic ancestry Tajiks . The average Tajik from Kabul is almost identical genetically to a Pashtun from central Afghanistan but given Tajiks from Kabul have slightly higher South Asian or East Asian ancestry than a Pashtun from central Afghanistan .. Then you have Pashtuns from NE Afghanistan like Laghman, Kunar, Peshawar and most of KPK that show higher South Asian admixture than the rest of Pashtuns .. They were likely Nuristani type people that assimilated to Pashtun culture.. Kalash people and NE Pashtuns are almost identical genetically From my research I’ve noticed Pashtuns in general have Mediterranean ancestry likely from a Greek or Macedonian source that no other Afghan does but it’s only minimal but in ancient genetic test it shows around 15% But overall Pashtuns, Tajiks, Kalash are molded as 65% shared European ancestry, 25% Iranian Plateau ancestry and 10% Onge type Ancestral South Asian Hunter gatherer admix ..
After alle these years of feasting on historical knowledge on the Mediterranean and Western European world and East-Asia these videos about Near-East, Central and Southern Asia are like a whole new banquet with sublime stories and peoples. What wonderful and intriguing histories do the descendants of these regions and empires have! You enrich the world. Proud to be a pupil to your cultures.
18:36 "The barren, inhospitable Thar desert" I've traveled across that desert on a camel two years ago and can confirm, it's inhospitable and hot as hell 😆
@@AHSANALI-tb3hs maybe due to canals and irrigation from nearby himalayan rivers. Also many say earlier it was fertile owing to these rivers which later on changed course.
Ghaznavids were a Turkic state established in India .Like Mughal empire, It is also of the same lineage as the Turkic Mamluk state established in Egypt.
@chachi mogo The problem is rooted from the modern conception of nationhood, people think ethnicities, cultures had clear borders in the past like today, which is wrong, middle east was a big cauldron, everything was put into it and mixed together. Ghaznavids were Ghaznavids, they weren't Turkic, Persian or Afghan. A Turkic elite who adopted Persian as lingua franca ruled over a largely Afghan population, saying it was a Turkic state isn't entirely wrong, but it oversimplifies it.
@Mansoor Ahmed they literally had a book on war tactics called something "yudh shashtra" But the non-violence ideology and fighting against Afghans,persians,turks,arabs is no joke.They were hugely outnumbered.
@Mansoor Ahmed The rajputs were Fearless warriors but without much mobility. They relied mostly on infantry. Mahmood used the cavalry masterfully. Just read the campaigns in depth before saying this.
@@rechalnorbu4740 like kings and general mentioned in the last part he did those bad things. But as those wealth goes to his empire and as idol breaking is considered as great feat he was seen as a hero maongst his people.
Regions where Turkic people ruled or inhabited or controlled were took over by Mongols that caused Turkic Tribes to move in to different directions (regions ) and they were also recruited by Arabs to Ward off Mongols since Turkic people and Mongols were from the similar regions and had similar nomadic culture .
It is interesting how different the institution of slavery in the caliphate from that in Europe or later the new world. Slaves in the caliphate were often highly educated, well trained, and held high positions of power second only to the caliph or even becoming rulers themselves such as those of the mamluk empire. This is vastly different from the poorly educated slave Labour institutions that we know about in the US for example where even educated slave were not allowed to read or write, and were forcibly stripped from their identities and home languages. It took the west over 1200 years to elect its first person of colour as president in the US. It seems that the Muslim world was way ahead of its time in the 800s. Ps: Not justifying slavery, it is just an observation.
USA Still has Slavery Today most of the Prison Population are Blacks and Mexicans, who are used as Cheap Labor this is called "The Prison Industrial Complex"
Lol color is the only thing Middle Eastern countries are still so backwards they will never have a Christian or jew rule and your talking about others being backward 😅
Well, they’re quick to forget whatever history doesn’t suit their narrative. As an indigenous of the continent, I know firsthand how they like to forget they tried to wipe out people out. Also this sort of history is really specific to this region, and frankly most people don’t care to learn anything outside of their own “country”. I do it because learning about history is awesome, and also you tend to notice how things move in circles, compared to the past. Events tend to correlate, though not exactly replicate past events, like how 100 years ago from now was also a time of pandemic and recession... And also more relevant to this video, 102 years ago, the Ottoman Empire would be defeated in 1918, and disbanded by 1921.
they are not "Turks". They are Ghazni's royal House so they are the Ghazanavids. They were Turkic by culture but also heavily Persianized by education and literacy. When looking at them they looked more like the Persians than the Turks. Look at the city names, none of them sound Turkish at all.
why are turks everywhere I see them in eastern Europe in central asia China and even Egypt and India these dudes are all over the place Edit: I have inadvertably created a warzone
Sabuktegin's story sounds a lot like Egypt's Mamluk Qutuz who also rose through the ranks until he became the ruler of the country and repelled the Mongols with Baibars at Ain Jalout
Saifuddin Qutuz was nephew of Jalallidin .... last KhorezmShah. He was sold to Egypt when he was a boy. The same boy who was sold became an Amir and defeated Mongols. A boy whose family have been slaughtered end up slaughtering mongols in Palestine.
This doco is fairly useful, since I'm planning on doing a story that features slave soldiers. Good to see history channels that make consistently good content
Династии империи Хорезмшахов тоже изначально были рабы и ещё Сайфутдин Кутуз ставший правитель Мамлюков тоже в детстве этого мальчика, монголы его продали на рабство и мальчик из рабство поднялся до главе государства мамлюков и в решающем войне мамлюки во главе Сайфутдин Кутуза против монголов одержали победа над монголов... Кстати Сайфутдин Кутуз тоже из семьи Хорезмшахов, сын родная сестра последний Султан Джалал адъ Дина
@@ILYAS-7 Yeah, and Qutuz is mentioned to have ripped his helmet off so his men could be inspired by his presence, and he managed to lead a charge that pushed back the Mongols at Ain Jalut. And afterward, he got murdered by his own men for his efforts, in typical Mamluk fashion.
@@somerandomrpgenthusiast8451 Его убил Бейбарс, Бейбарс был один из военный начальником армии Мамлюков и он тоже по происхождению Тюрк как и Сайфутдин Китуз. В конце правления Султан Бейбарса тоже отравили его и убили. То ист карма настигла его за то что когда-то он убил Сайфутдин Китуза...
@@ILYAS-7 I remember Baybars and Qutuz had prior fought against each other and only worked together due to the Mongols being the greater foe. Then afterward Baybars and his supporters took the chance to kill Qutuz while he was hunting. The amount of infighting and assassinations in the Mamluk Sultanate was insane
Ooo Ghaznavidz vs Seljuk Turks things are getting more and more interesting I cant wait to see this one. One of the most underrated subjects of Turkic history. I recommend you to make video of Mughal empire and Sultan Baburs life next time. And of course Taj Mahals story.😀
Respect to Ghaznavid! He was also a powerful undefeatable commander in the world! He attacked different parts of South Asia 17x and was successful with all of them!
@@shafqatishan437 India is reaching mars and you are still trying to break the time. All right,but by the time you do that we will have another temple on Mars lol
@@lakshaynegi82 "InDiA iS rEaChInG mArS" abey loru, Mars pe jaa kr kia ukhaar liya tum logon ne han? 🤣 khud ki 25% se zyada population ghurbat se neechy ki zindagi guzar rahi hy aor ye bc is baat pr khush hain k Mars pr pohanch chuky hain LMFAO
Should have included more on the Hindu Shahan of Kabul, the last Hindu Dynasty in Southern Central Asia. Jayapala and Anandapala put up quite a fight against the Ghazanavids.
Jaypal was last Punjabi Rajput hindu Ruler of modern day Afghanistan and northwest Pakistan. He fought graciously against Pashtun and Turk warriors but couldn't save the integrity of Hindu shahi kingdom
@@AWMuSick hes actually right, the word hindu was coined somewhere around 16th/17th century. The original word was sindhu(people of sindh). The persians used to call them hindu, hence came forth the word hindu. Hindu is more like a nationality than religious identity.
@@animedubbed7982 16-17th Century ? You sure ? 😂😂😂 Google Hindu Shahi Dynasty and look at the Ruling Period it is indeed termed by Persians but you are terribly misinformed on the Century and Dates, that's why my Congratulations to him and you for Enlightening me 🙏🏼
The founder of the Saffarids, precursors to the Safavids and Ghaznavids, was a coppersmith who moved and became a warrior who eventually gained enough power to become independent.
Commander of the faithful, wali amir al-muminin, sword of Allah, holy Warrior, Sultan of the east, Yamīn ad-Dawlah Abul-Qāṣim Maḥmūd Ibn Sebüktegīn. 17 legendary campaigns, 0 defeats. Great video!
Khālid ibn al-Walīd ibn al-Mughīra al-Makhzūmī was a great Muslim hero, a warrior, a gazi, a mujhid! May Allah subhanahu wa ta'ala, bless him, his family, reward him and grant him the highest rank in Jannah.
I search you 1st before anyone else. Comprehensive, straight forward, and elaborate. I've recommended you to many history students. Wanted to know if you all are going to do any playthroughs of crusader kings III or banner lord. I would love to see you wipe the floor with what you have accumulated.
This is a great video and explains how memluks formed. I am waiting for their Egypt Era. Also you pronounce names nearly perfect. I believe you make a research for how names sound?
I think you should tell about the war between the Gokturks and the Sassanids.(628 Goktürks Sassanids war)Also, the Gökturks won the Mongols in four of the four wars and expelled them from Central Asia.(Göktürks Juan juan wars)
Well commented by Abdullah The opportunity for social mobility which islam provides is unmatched throughout history . Slaves becoming great kings was very common throughout medieval islamic history . Other than the Ghaznavids , we have Mamluk ( Slave ) dynasty of Egypt ruling it for nearly three centuries . We have Mamluk dynasty in India , established and ruled by the former slaves of the Ghorid king Muizuddin . Malik Amber etc ... You won't find this change of fortunes from zero to hero in other cultures . The slavery which was practiced by muslims was radically different from western notion of slavery . Islam gave slaves their proper rights and commanded it's adherents to treat them well .
It was very tragic incident in Indian history Somnath temple was rebuilt after Indians independence In 1947 still some remains of the old temple are available on the site . I have visited the temple In Gujarat .
Ghaznavid empire was glorious times in afghan history. They are loved beyond imagination to those day. Some of the best scientists and poets came from this area
@@baheditsTr You realize that 1/3 of all Afghans are of Turkic or mongoloid origin like the Hazara, Uzbek, Kyrgyz, Turkmen, Pashai..... and they're not a tiny minority because the rest 70% is divided into two with 40% being Pashtuns and 30% being Tajiks. Funnily the Pashtuns and Tajik of Afghanistan probably have way more Turkic blood than any Turk from Turkey.
@@shab3883Because 60% of the Turks in Turkey are Oghuz Turks, 40% of the population is Kurds and Anatolian peoples The Ghaznavid state is a Turkic state because olf Turkish was spoken within the dynasty and the military system was the Turkic system, they wrote works in Turkic, the Mongols lived as tribes at that time, there were no Mongols in Central Asia, they were tribal in North China and Mongolia. this state was formed by Qarluk Turks and Turkmens, the culture was only Persian, the Iranian states were ruled by the Turks for a long time, but they do not accept it And today they are making propaganda and showing many Turkic states as Iranian states in history books 😂 Ghaznavids is 🇺🇿🇹🇲 My Iranian Turk friends know how you are doing assimilation policy How logical is it to steal the history of a nation and make them look like an Iranian state?
@@Khorasan_Turco Buddy, where did you get, your information from? You’re ass? Because the Ghaznavid's judicial and legislative courts were all in Persian (Dari), they followed Afghan customs, norms, and traditions. They were Hanafi Sunnis just like guess who else, the Afghans. And unlike you, I have sources to back my claims. “Although the dynasty was of Central Asian Turkic origin, it was thoroughly Persianized in terms of language, culture, literature, and habits[e][55][f][56] and has been regarded as a "Persian dynasty".” Wikipedia, Ziad 2006 p.294 and Meisami 1999 p.143. Regarding their tactics, you claimed something beyond stupid “They used Turkic tactics”, what are Turkic tactics supposed to refer to, did Turks use some unknown tactics which no one else had devised? Furthermore, it would be best if you were humiliated and ashamed because not only did they not use you’re ambiguous Turkic tactics but instead used Arab traditions. “Like the other dynasties that rose out of the remains of the Abbasid Caliphate, the Ghaznavid administrative traditions and military practice came from the Abbasids. The Arabian horses, at least in the earliest campaign, were still substantial in Ghaznavid military incursions, especially in dashing raids deep into hostile territory. A record of '6000 Arab horses' being sent against King Anandapala in 1008, and evidence of this Arabian cavalry persists until 1118 under the Ghaznavid governor in Lahore.[51]” As for addressing you’re beloved Turk blood and genealogy, the pussy Turks (Ottomans) that got pounded by Afghans and the whole of the Balkans, unfortunately for you, have very small levels of Turkic blood and in some cases it’s non-existent. They are Islamized Anatolian Greeks, and their physical appearance further reinforces this undeniable fact. Turkic people have a more Asian look, but I don’t see that in any Turk, in fact, if you had researched, the country with the purest Turks like the original forefathers is Afghanistan, where because mountains have been secluded from the rest of the world and have maintained their blood unmixed. And coming to your Iranian friend. No one cares about or cares about his bum ass. Finally, don’t try teaching me about Mongols or Turks because my knowledge is beyond your puny brain.
@@Khorasan_Turcoghaznavid aren’t either iranian or turkic, mahmud ghazni was from a city called ghazni in modern day afghanistan, his mother was from zabul YOURE the one stealing afghan history the court language of ghaznavid empire was dari you can’t claim a whole empire that is afghan as turkic, mind u there are native turkic people such as hazaras in afghanistan living for millennium LOL
@@Shahanshah.Shahin hahaha whose army? Mahmud Ghaznavid army? He invaded India 17 times and declared as the conqueror wherever he went in India. You better not to follow your local history teacher and read some unbiased historians.
@@BIGMrighthere in the english, it is written just that he was acknowledged as a ruler, but in the minted coins ( as far as i could read) there was the title of "ملك", King written by the side of his name, which is a bit odd, as no ruler in islam is allowed to claim that title, as long as there is a caliph again maybe i read it wrong, but that is what i could get.
@@thestatistician6076 An Emir/King is not a Sultan/Authority, but a Sultan can still be an Emir. Judging from wikipedia, Samanids had an Amirate/Emirate.
Everything you mentioned is 100% true!It is completely same as in our history school books in Pakistan 🇵🇰.Hats off to you !Mahmoud Ghazna is known in Pakistan as Sultan Mahmood Ghaznavi.He is one of the most famous and appreciated Muslim leader
Rajasekar Srinivasan hahaha it is in history that your so called preachers offered bribery to leave the temple but we hate bribery and it is hated in every religion so go to Kashmir and see your humanity
@@ahmadibrahim5112 ZUBOY or inn jese idol worshipers ke han jo bacha peda hota hai wo Mehmood Ghaznavi Rehmaullah ka darr le ker peda hota hai, chotay se bachay ke samnay naam lo wo chalang maar ke agay pichay dekhta Mehmud Sultan to nae agay😂
Europe,North Africa, Middle East/west Asia, central Asia and South Asia all of these regions are interesting for me I always learn about these regions because it seems like they were connected in history to each other
obsexo zerzual What the F do Big hazel eyed Mediterranean Turkish people have to do with Central Asian nomads ??? They are not the same people. If you want to see what an original Turk looks like then go to Kazakhstan
Do you have have any recommendations for books detailing governance of Islamic eastern kingdoms during this era? I'm interested especially in how the Muslim conquerers ruled Delhi in that era.
When you study history of Central Asia you feel like there is a *spawn point* somewhere at northern Himalayas 🤨 from 1000 b.c. to late 18th century there been dozens of Iranic or Turkic migrations westwards to the Central Asia region. Scythians, tocharians, Han, parnian, yeuzhi, hephthalites, uyghurs, Alans, mongols, afghans and russians. Someone have to patch it this spawn point is such a bug.
The tale of the slave-turned-emperor Sabuktegin is a fascinating and awesome epic of struggles hardships of life, a tale wich would not be possible if Sabuktegin didn't play Raid:Sahdow Legends, the most ambitious...
Ghaznavids are of Turkish origin. Before the Ghaznavid State, there were Turkish communities in Afghanistan, and the Ghaznavid State was founded largely on the basis of these communities. Sebük Tigin, the founder of the Ghaznavid State, became a Muslim when he came to the Samanid homeland as a slave (Gulam). At that time, the identity of a state was named according to its rulers. According to Sebük Tigin's Pend-Nâme (advice book), he is from the tribe of "Barsahlılar" in Turkestan. Sebük Tigin was bought by the Samanid Emir Alp Tegin as a "Turkish Slave". Abu'l Gazi Bahadır Han states that Sebük Tigin, the father of Sultan Gazneli Mahmud, was from the Kayı clan.
Would be great if you include there wars with Hindu Shahis which were really epic and how Muslims who were not able to conquer any land , not even Afghanistan except Sindh is also a battle worth of mentioning as there were able to capture Spain but not even Afghanistan as Hindu Shahis were dominating force in that area
They also return to thier r*pe culture.. The reason why muslims invaded them in the first place.. But that's the kind of a culture you will have when you idolise perverted deities
I have not started and i am already excitted. Thanks for sharing our history. I have read some chapters of Beihaghi's history, which was written at that time
These conqueror left a great impact in the region of Subcontinent and Central Asia. They are one of the reasons why Pakistan and Turkey shares such a strong bond to this day despite sharing no borders. I would like you to give details about their administrative skills and how effectively they manage their empires for so long. For example one of his famous general Ayaz who was the governor of Lahore and known for his administrative skills.
He did left a great impact in India , Hindus realized that like they gave land to zoros , those zoros who talked about how their whole culture and civilization as raped and converted weren't exaggerated
Install Raid for Free ✅ IOS: clcr.me/Oct_KingsGs_ios ✅ ANDROID: clcr.me/Oct_KingsGs_Android ✅ PC: clcr.me/Oct_KingsGs_PC and get a special starter pack 💥Available only for the next 30 days
NOOOOOO WHYYYYYYY
No u
Finally a video on the most northern parts of Indian subcontinent
When you will make a video on Mysore empire or Maratha Empire or chola empire or suri sultanate?
Thank you, but no thank you! Not my type of game..... But if it was more like Kindom Come, maby then
Level 0: Slave
Level 1000: Emperor
which game was it from .. i cant remember :D :D
Lmao
@Aleksa Petrovic indeed i remember :D
@@shafqatishan437 bro dont stuck between details just enjoy the joke and laugh :D
only in d islamic world a slave got so much respect due to our Islamic law which specifically told us not to oppress and persecute even d slaves
You know you are a caliphate when you have an empire as a vassal who has another empire in turn as their vassal.
Hahaha good one
Legit.
@King Wiwuz IV
Actually, Abbasid Caliph Al Qadir had an actual real power over the Gaznavi Empire.
Not really. A caliphate just means it’s ruled by a caliph. A sort of king religious figure. Caliphates could be small or large. Just like empires. For instance Germany today was once called the German Empire even though it had always been known as Germany and was made up of several kings in that one empire. Same can be said for America. It could be considered an Empire just bc of all the separate states make it up.
sabuktegin means "from sabuk family" it is an old turkic word probably still used in central asia
The Ghaznavids were finally screwed by the Seljuk Turks at the Battle of Dandanaquan near Merv and which started the great Seljuk Empire..
it happened in the era of Sultaan Masoud.
Then the KaraKhitai arrived with the Chinese
Gaznavi was also turk
Spoilers dude
@@olumluhayatbugunvarsinyari1326 ya ghori khilji mongol and alot of others
The Ghaznavid dynasty was a Muslim Dynasty of Turkic mamluk origin, at their greatest extent ruling large parts of Iran, Afghanistan, much of Transoxiana and the northwest Indian subcontinent from 977 to 1186.
Turks everywhere....
Turkic dynasty
Gazneliler bizim atalarımız Çünkü Oğuz Türkleri 🇹🇷
y seef hahaha Yeah But OGHUZ TURKIC 🇹🇷😂
Turkic ....
This is where the seljuks adopted their brownish skin :0 poor nationalists..
Can we all appreciate how cool the name "Sabuktegin" sounds? It is easy to remember as a name, even when you're a foreigner.
It's not that I disagree, but I think that what sounds cool depends on what your native language is. If a set of sounds are commonly used in your daily life, they probably loose their coolness as the novelty wears off.
Tegin means “ancestor” in Kyrgyz language, which define your identity and to which family person belongs, and tegin word is still used in modern kyrgyz language.
Sabuktegin in this case means this person belongs to Sabuk family
And Alptegin is also a characteristic name for Kyrgyz people since Alp means hero and warrior, and this name also used widely among turkic people as Alptegin, Alperen, Alper... ( kyrgyz people are one of the central asian turkic tribes)
I agree it is quite cool. My #1 however has to be Aurangzeb of the Mughals 😃
Names ending with tegin/tigin is still common in Turkish. It is an honorary name basically meaning lord or prince. Sabuktegin=lord Sabuk, Alptegin=Lord Alp(yeah Alp is still used, see:my name)
Swiss Alps also turkik name
I never knew the turks reaches the apls
@@peace_ab The word "Alp" was and is used by the Turkic people and means "warrior" but it has absolutely no connection to the Alpine mountain range.
Interesting. In Burmese, it's "thakin".
Pancho Halo huns of Attila did))
I love the illustrations you guys use on your videos, too many channels just portray the localities of west and central Asia as being stereotypically Bedouin, but you guys actually put effort to portray the people, clothing, terrain, architecture and armor pretty spot on.
I love Turkic and nomad civilizations history
Turkic nomads are like a even more badass version of vikings lol
As brutal as they are you cant deny they got style!
Some Turkic Dynasty was brutal
Pommy Pie cry harder
@Pommy Pie it's funny how you hold grudges against a man 1000 years ago 😂
True
@Bozkurt postuna bürünmüş yobaz AraB devesi o nasıl isim lan :D
Central Asia is a region filled with interesting history and culture. Who else wants to stay in a yurt?
I had been meaning to do it for long years and managed at last in Kyrgyzistan. That was a great experience i would like to repeat. You feel freedom of nomads through your veins after some local drinks 😀
Its a land of warriors. No other region brought more warlords than central asia.
Ghaznavid,
Karakhanids,
Seljuqi
Khorezmiy
Temuri
Baburi
Ottomans origins are also central asia.
Anatolian Turks refers to central asia as “Atayurt” means fatherland.
There are no ethnic groups who destroyed and built empires more than Turks.
Even Gengiz khans army was 60-80% Turkic tribes.
@@1212-m6b The Ghaznavid became an empire and one of the mightiest empire in the world because of Mahmud of Ghazni .
People always talk about Sabuktigin what they not tell is that Sabuktigin not want to rebel against the Persian Samanid .
It was Mahmud who wanted to rebel against the Samanid .
Sabuktin at his greatest controlled a minuscule patch of land , the Ghanavid territory under Sabuktigin was a jok it wasn't eve. independent lol .
It was Mahmud who made the Ghaznavid an empire but also one of the most mighty .
Mahmud is half-Persian by his mother side .
He went to school with Persian and even his friend were Persian .
One of his Persian school mate became a Vizier of the Ghaznavid empire .
Mahmud was nicknamed "Mahmud of Zabulistan" because his Persian mother was from Zabulistan .
Everyone agree that Sabuktigin was EXTREMELY weak compared to Mahmud .
Everything great about the Ghaznavid was by Mahmud the half-Persian .
Mahmud was more Persian than even the 100% Iranic Samanid .
Under Mahmud's Ghaznavid empire the Persian culture was in a golden age .
The Shanameh was completed .
And Ferdowsi only say that Mahmud was Turk because Ferdowsi not like Mahmud because Mahmud not pay Ferdowsi in gold as promised .
Because someone who not like Ferdowsi took the gold and instead put silver thus making Ferdowsi think Mahmud not want to pay him .
Mahmud thinking Ferdowsi insults him by not taking the gold then order Ferdowsi to be executed .
Ferdowsi run away and started saying that Mahmud was a Turk .
When Mahmud know that someone changed the gold coin and put silver instead he knew he made a mistake and so he regretted and send gold to Ferdowsi but unfortunately Ferdowsi die before the gold and the apology of Mahmud arrive .
Mahmud as a person was a Persian .
His DNA is 50% Persian .
Under him no Persian believe that they were rulled by a Turk .
The Ghaznavid empire wasn't Turkish empire that subjugated Persian .
It was a Persian / Iranian empire rulled by Mahmud a half Persian .
Also even his father Sabuktigin claimed descend from the Sassanian Shah " " " "Sabuktigin, the son of Jukan, the son of Kuzil-Hukum, the son of Kuzil-Arslan, the son of Firuz, the son of Yezdijird, king of Persia."
🤣😂 Sabuktigin not care about Turk lol , he wanted to be Persian 🤣😂 .
His son was Half-Persian .
I don't know why Turks are proud of him or his son ? lol .
Sabuktigin was a Turk who was loyal to the Iranian Samanid .
Sabuktigin was extremely Persianized and even try to claim he was from the line of the Sassanian king .
Sabuktigin not care about Turk lol he not even want to rebel against the Samanid .
Sabuktigin didn't rule over an empire he was a governor of a small territory that was a vassal of the Samanid .
The Ghanavid empire begun with Mahmud of Ghazni the half-Persian ( who is the son of a Persian woman who was a daughter of an Iranian aristocrat from Zabulistan ) not Sabuktigin .
Sabuktigin work for the Samanid as was his master Alp-Tegin .
Both Alp-Tegin and Sabuktigin were EXTREMELY loyal to the Persian Samanid .
Both Alp-Tegin and Sabuktigin were EXTREMELY Persianisized and Iranisized .
Why Turks proud of Alp-Tegin and Sabuktigin ?
Sabuktigin always claim he was from Sassanian line because he proud of being an Iranian .
Alp-Tegin loyaly work for the Samanid Persian .
Funny both 100% Turk blood Alp-Tegin and Sabuktigin were 100% loyal to the Persian Samanid .
It was Mahmud the half-Persian who create and build the greatest empire in the Islamic world not the Turks Sabuktigin or Alp-Tegin .
Both Turks Alp Tegin and Sabuktigin were canine to the Persian Samanid .
The half-Persian Mahmud of Ghazni deserve 100% of the praise , he was true Persian king who made Persian culture reach a golden age .
@@1212-m6b Timurid is Mongol origin Timur is Mongol-Persian origin , Baburid is Mongol origin Babur is a Mongol .
@@1212-m6b Karakhanids is Mongol origin nothing Turkic .
Thank you, your videos are really professional. I feel there are gaps in my knowledge of events from that part of the world (the 'stans' area), and your videos are really helpful in bridging that gap. A lot of emphasis in popular circles tends to be history of the mediterranian and levant region, so it is nice to see coverage of other areas of the world.
Basically turks ruled the stans areas.
Dude I didn't know this but as I learn more and more it seems clear that Turks ruled the middle ages.
Yup. Arab rule over the Muslim world was actually much shorter than the Turkic rule that came after
Here in the English and French speaking Americas, we were made to believe that it was the Franks, the Celtics and the Vikings who ruled the middle ages
It depends how you wish to look at it, the Turks achieved hegemony relatively quickly over Anatolia and much of the Middle East, and from the time of the Arab caliphate they’re wasn’t really another major power in the region until the mamlukes, who were relatively quickly dispatched by the Turkish hegemony. The Turks just didn’t really have a major rival in the area, whereas Europe for instance is tightly packed with many different peoples and rivalry’s, and has been since the first kingdoms there. Which drove constant technological advancements and the looking of new ways to do things, including new resources found overseas through colonies or trade, the latter of which eventually meant getting around Turkish taxes en route to China and India.
The Turks had an amazing position that they managed to keep pacified for most of their rule, no major rival in the region, this gave them an amazing advantage, but also lead to their eventual stagnation, as they became trapped by their own position once everyone learned how to bypass them on the way to China and India, while they also remained out of reach of the new world. It’s really an incredible story about how they benefited from their situation but were also ultimately undone by it too, as a result its kind of hard to say who “ruled” the Middle Ages, you could just as easily say the same thing about the Chinese.
The Turks and Chinese were similar in the fact they lacked region rivals, whereas Europe is essentially the opposite, a bunch of rivals keeping each other in check making sure none get too strong and can overpower the rest. Also if you had to pick a place to start your civilisation, you can’t do much better than Anatolia, Persia, northern/middle China and of course the US, hence why all those states became world superpowers at one point or another 🤔
Watch the video named "history of turks" which is a mapping video on youtube. Turks domimated euroasia.
In middle ages only rival of Turkic Empire was another Turkic Empire
I think it's a little misleading to say that slaves were the lowest in medieval society, especially Islamic Central Asia and South West Asia. You do bring it up later, but the military slaves like Ghulams and Mamelukes were above common freemen and would be for centuries to come. A similar system was in the Ottoman Empire with the Janissaries, and while legally they were slaves of the Sultan, they were most certainly above almost everyone else in the empire. Similarly in Rome, the Emperors personal slaves were often elevated, even at times talking down to prominent Senators. Of course, most slaves were not like that, but it's not inherent that slaves were at the bottom of society.
Although even then, I think the reason slaves were given such important jobs was because they had no power or influence except from what was given to them by their masters, so they couldn't easily start a rebellion, and could be killed without consequence if they started causing trouble.
@@iapetusmccool They did on multiple occasions though especially in Muslim empires. There's the two Mameluke dynasties, the Ghaznanavids and Muhammand Ali Pasha just to name a few.
@@TheDirtysouthfan Mohamed Ali Pasha wasn’t a mamluk, he was the son of an Albanian trader and commander.
@@TheDirtysouthfan Mohamed Ali even rounded up the mamluks after taking back Egypt from the French and killed them to avoid further rebellion in Salah Al Din’s Castle
@@iapetusmccool actually this wasn't the case most of the time. "Slave soldiers" in Abbasid Caliphate most of the time decided who to be caliph and held the real power. As in the video, Ghaznavids overthrew Samanids and in Egypt, Mamelukes overthrew Ayyubids. Even in Ottoman Empire, Jannisaries started many revolts which caused the change of the Sultan.
The Mamalik dynasty, were all slaves. An entire dynasty ruled Egypt, the Levint, and the Hejaz (the Holly cities of Mecca and Medina) were slaves. Ruling for 400 years
Turks controlled Mamluks too. Example: Tomanbay
@@Tengrinin_Kirbaci they kept on ruling Egypt on the ottoman behalf till the citadel massacre of the 1800s
Defeated by ottomans
And then ottomans became caliphs
@Toonimation that’s not true whoever rules fairly and gives everybody rights deserves
to be caliph. this is what Islam teaches
When you are so early that there is only 1 view.
Is this somekind of aristrocratic joke, I'm too commoner to understand!
This is my #1 history channel close second is history marche and epic history.
Me too
Oddly me too
Pike and shot channel along with SandRhoman history are my favourite history channels
what about oversimplified
@@smilingcat9997 They are ok for a brief synopsis of events and stuff. But they only scratch the surface. I do like them of course but there's a lot better more in depth channels.
I don't know whether it is a coincidence or not, but your latest videos (from the last month or so) unintentionally revolve around topics I am reading about in this period. Good job, keep it up.
I can't stand hearing about Raid Shadow Legends anymore.
its a fever dream we cant escape
Don't we all
This comment brought to you by Raid Shadow Legends
It’s been a while since I saw an ad about that game, it’s almost nostalgic.
Almost.
I want to know the soundtracks they use rather than this mobile game
Is Central Asia only controlled by rags to riches stories
It is not unusual to see slaves who become rulers and sultans in Islamic states.
It is said that even Timur was from a noble and wealthy family. Also that his injuries were sustained from battle rather than from being a thief.
Well yes but no
The mamluk(slave) dynasy ruled egypt and syria for 400 years,also ruled india. the slave of muhammad of ghour qutbuddin aibak was the first ruler of the dynasty
Civil War Week By Week The first ruler of the Saffarids was a coppersmith who became a warrior and gained independence.
The Ghaznavid empire is one of the most underrated states its foundation marked the begin of a series of turkic states based in the iranian plateuau dynasties like seljuks,khwarezmids,ak and kara koyunlus,timurids,safavids,afsharids,qajars most of them contributed to the perso-turkic islamic culture even found in the indian subcontinent with delhi sultanate and mughals. Love your work btw 🙌🖤
Dude, put a period now and then.
The white huns tho
Afsharids were persian though
U need to stop other history..mughals timurds are mongol..safavid are persian...delhi were afghan
@@user-wy6nx1du7n lol they were from the oghuz turkic AFSHAR tribe 😂
I don't think I was this excited when an episode of "Game Of Thrones" came out! Love your work Kings and Generals Team. Thank you.
BTW Sultan Mahmud is first titleholder of "Sultan" title. There was no sultan title before him.
@I NSA Ofcourse it might be common. But malik was more common that that.
Sultan is an Arab title not Turkic
I NSA Persian Language is much much older then Arabic, hope this sums it up
Sultans came after Arab Caliphs.
First real Sultan Kings were the Seljuks.
shah is much stronger name then sultan
I’m from Tajikistan 🇹🇯 where Ismail Samanid praised a lot but no one talks about his brother Mahmud.
Love your channel sir! Keep up the great work.
Махмуд газнави карлук прямой потомок нынешних УЗБЕКов
Ismail was a Tajik from balkh Afghanistan 🇦🇫
Ismail samani was a tajik from balkh
🇦🇫🌞
I am a Central Asian turco-persian and I'm glad to see these guys finally get the respect they deserve. 🇦🇫 🇹🇯 🇺🇿 🇰🇿 🇹🇲 🇰🇿
But still you guys are barbaric not successful civilizations
Take Afghan out Pashtuns ain't the same as you
@@klawson8617 actually I’m a Pashtun Afghan and I’ve done multiple DNA test, Pashtuns are nearest population to the skeleton remains found of Ghaznavid soldiers .. DNA evidence shows basically the modern population of Afghanistan being Pashtun, Tajik, Uzbek, Turkmen all have had a shared past through genetic research
@Persian Sounds I'm pashtun aswell. You're getting confused. Turkmen and Tajiks have merged with us throughout the centuries. Uzbeks are different. But saying we are the same as them is wrong. They assimilated into the dominant culture which was the Pashtun. Not the other way round
@@klawson8617 not from a genetic standpoint that is incorrect.. The proxy for purest Pashtun or nearest to the proto Pashtuns are Khandaris.. Genetically they have the highest Steppe ancestry or Iranic and lowest South Asian AASI which is around 8% .. Isolated Tajiks like Pamiris and Yaghnobis even Ishkashimi Tajiks have more Iranic ancestry than Pashtuns but these are minority amongst Tajiks .. The nearest people to Pashtuns are these high Iranic ancestry Tajiks . The average Tajik from Kabul is almost identical genetically to a Pashtun from central Afghanistan but given Tajiks from Kabul have slightly higher South Asian or East Asian ancestry than a Pashtun from central Afghanistan ..
Then you have Pashtuns from NE Afghanistan like Laghman, Kunar, Peshawar and most of KPK that show higher South Asian admixture than the rest of Pashtuns .. They were likely Nuristani type people that assimilated to Pashtun culture.. Kalash people and NE Pashtuns are almost identical genetically
From my research I’ve noticed Pashtuns in general have Mediterranean ancestry likely from a Greek or Macedonian source that no other Afghan does but it’s only minimal but in ancient genetic test it shows around 15%
But overall Pashtuns, Tajiks, Kalash are molded as 65% shared European ancestry, 25% Iranian Plateau ancestry and 10% Onge type Ancestral South Asian Hunter gatherer admix ..
After alle these years of feasting on historical knowledge on the Mediterranean and Western European world and East-Asia these videos about Near-East, Central and Southern Asia are like a whole new banquet with sublime stories and peoples. What wonderful and intriguing histories do the descendants of these regions and empires have! You enrich the world. Proud to be a pupil to your cultures.
What an appreciation :-) ... Kudos
Great! I was looking forward to an episode about Ghaznavids!! Thank you :D
18:36 "The barren, inhospitable Thar desert" I've traveled across that desert on a camel two years ago and can confirm, it's inhospitable and hot as hell 😆
Hmm.. still its pretty populated for a desert.
It is the only fertile desert in the world too.
@@AHSANALI-tb3hs maybe due to canals and irrigation from nearby himalayan rivers. Also many say earlier it was fertile owing to these rivers which later on changed course.
It's a desert, what else do you expect lmfao
let's be honest, people are super hospitable there, innit?
This is my favourite channel on TH-cam, every time you put a new video out I can't click fast enough! 😂👊
Ghaznavids were a Turkic state established in India
.Like Mughal empire,
It is also of the same lineage as the Turkic Mamluk state established in Egypt.
@Вхламинго Dumb ass, they were originally brought in from Central Asia.
@Вхламинго bruh .d
@Вхламинго Lol
@Arun Kumar well, they do know genetic engineering
China helping them to change their genes
@chachi mogo The problem is rooted from the modern conception of nationhood, people think ethnicities, cultures had clear borders in the past like today, which is wrong, middle east was a big cauldron, everything was put into it and mixed together. Ghaznavids were Ghaznavids, they weren't Turkic, Persian or Afghan. A Turkic elite who adopted Persian as lingua franca ruled over a largely Afghan population, saying it was a Turkic state isn't entirely wrong, but it oversimplifies it.
I'm literally doing a Ghaznavid playthrough right now in CK3 so this is quite well timed
Make sure that Tashkent Prospers and that dynasty of Khoja rules it
@War fîgHtÉR Crusader Kings 3 game by paradox
Man I really wanna play that game, if only my computer ram is enough...
"literally" doing it, huh.
Ghaznavid and Khilji is Khalaj Turkic from Karluk Turkic !
Mahmood of Ghazni was one of the greatest cavalry commanders in history, invading india successfully 17 times is not a joke.
@Mansoor Ahmed they literally had a book on war tactics called something "yudh shashtra"
But the non-violence ideology and fighting against Afghans,persians,turks,arabs is no joke.They were hugely outnumbered.
@Mansoor Ahmed The rajputs were Fearless warriors but without much mobility. They relied mostly on infantry. Mahmood used the cavalry masterfully. Just read the campaigns in depth before saying this.
@Benjamin Franklin US mein kyu reh h agar deshbhakt h to? Koi jawab h?
@@benjaminfranklin2426 Bengals also won the first war
Your comment itself is a joke😂
My school oversimplified this topic till now I used to think he was a tyrant who loved to raid.
Thank you kings and generals for teaching me
I mean he was from our perspective but for his people as all those wealth were spent on them, he was good.
True
@@rechalnorbu4740 like kings and general mentioned in the last part he did those bad things. But as those wealth goes to his empire and as idol breaking is considered as great feat he was seen as a hero maongst his people.
@@Abhishek-sr2pu He was not a tyrant
@obsexo zerzual true
Sebuk Tegin and Mahmud of Ghazni were the awesome Turkic commanders of history. I am proud of being Turk 🇦🇿🇹🇲🇹🇷🇰🇿🇺🇿🇰🇬
And Muslim most importantly.
@@naeemislam9820 Yes of course ☪️
🤣😂 Turkic 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@ramirez4295 What is the funny thing ?
@@lastkhwarezmianshah8714 from Afghanistan not Turkic 🤣🤣
Excelente episodio ❤️✨.
Amazing content Kings and Generals, I really enjoy learning your content. One of my favorite channels. Nice Job!
Regions where Turkic people ruled or inhabited or controlled were took over by Mongols that caused Turkic Tribes to move in to different directions (regions ) and they were also recruited by Arabs to Ward off Mongols since Turkic people and Mongols were from the similar regions and had similar nomadic culture .
It is interesting how different the institution of slavery in the caliphate from that in Europe or later the new world. Slaves in the caliphate were often highly educated, well trained, and held high positions of power second only to the caliph or even becoming rulers themselves such as those of the mamluk empire. This is vastly different from the poorly educated slave Labour institutions that we know about in the US for example where even educated slave were not allowed to read or write, and were forcibly stripped from their identities and home languages. It took the west over 1200 years to elect its first person of colour as president in the US. It seems that the Muslim world was way ahead of its time in the 800s.
Ps: Not justifying slavery, it is just an observation.
USA Still has Slavery Today most of the Prison Population are Blacks and Mexicans, who are used as Cheap Labor this is called "The Prison Industrial Complex"
Ye and their first POC president was a gay lol
Slavery began in Mesopotamia 1200 bc
@and highest illiteracy is still in Yemen and Afghanistan and Mali
Lol color is the only thing
Middle Eastern countries are still so backwards they will never have a Christian or jew rule and your talking about others being backward 😅
Ghaznavid TURKS. Karakhanid Turks. I love how they “forget” to mention this in the west, when talking about all those turkish empires.
yeap and they never forget to mention mongols even if they arent involved.
@Woiller- Relic TURK.
Well, they’re quick to forget whatever history doesn’t suit their narrative. As an indigenous of the continent, I know firsthand how they like to forget they tried to wipe out people out.
Also this sort of history is really specific to this region, and frankly most people don’t care to learn anything outside of their own “country”.
I do it because learning about history is awesome, and also you tend to notice how things move in circles, compared to the past.
Events tend to correlate, though not exactly replicate past events, like how 100 years ago from now was also a time of pandemic and recession...
And also more relevant to this video, 102 years ago, the Ottoman Empire would be defeated in 1918, and disbanded by 1921.
they are not "Turks". They are Ghazni's royal House so they are the Ghazanavids. They were Turkic by culture but also heavily Persianized by education and literacy. When looking at them they looked more like the Persians than the Turks. Look at the city names, none of them sound Turkish at all.
@@SantomPh lol ok. Of course they are Turks...
why are turks everywhere I see them in eastern Europe in central asia China and even Egypt and India these dudes are all over the place
Edit: I have inadvertably created a warzone
😂😂😂
@@tokmakchibashiand how can I forget the middle east
Cerridian Empire and mongolia,siberia,nothern africa
@@tokmakchibashi did God forget to nerf their birth rates
Cerridian Empire xd
Sabuktegin's story sounds a lot like Egypt's Mamluk Qutuz who also rose through the ranks until he became the ruler of the country and repelled the Mongols with Baibars at Ain Jalout
@Fwrus Uses Yeah I meant that they both had a Riches to Rags to Riches kind of story
Saifuddin Qutuz was nephew of Jalallidin .... last KhorezmShah.
He was sold to Egypt when he was a boy. The same boy who was sold became an Amir and defeated Mongols. A boy whose family have been slaughtered end up slaughtering mongols in Palestine.
Qutuz is Turkman and Saboktagin is Karluk !
@@rafliysafariy9820 Quttuz is also Karluk
@@ДжакамоКазановаSayf Aldin Qutuz son of Jalal Aldin Minguberdi Turkmen Begdli/Oghuz
Plz Make Video On Maratha Empire😍😊
This doco is fairly useful, since I'm planning on doing a story that features slave soldiers. Good to see history channels that make consistently good content
Династии империи Хорезмшахов тоже изначально были рабы и ещё Сайфутдин Кутуз ставший правитель Мамлюков тоже в детстве этого мальчика, монголы его продали на рабство и мальчик из рабство поднялся до главе государства мамлюков и в решающем войне мамлюки во главе Сайфутдин Кутуза против монголов одержали победа над монголов...
Кстати Сайфутдин Кутуз тоже из семьи Хорезмшахов, сын родная сестра последний Султан Джалал адъ Дина
@@ILYAS-7 Yeah, and Qutuz is mentioned to have ripped his helmet off so his men could be inspired by his presence, and he managed to lead a charge that pushed back the Mongols at Ain Jalut. And afterward, he got murdered by his own men for his efforts, in typical Mamluk fashion.
@@somerandomrpgenthusiast8451 Его убил Бейбарс, Бейбарс был один из военный начальником армии Мамлюков и он тоже по происхождению Тюрк как и Сайфутдин Китуз.
В конце правления Султан Бейбарса тоже отравили его и убили. То ист карма настигла его за то что когда-то он убил Сайфутдин Китуза...
@@ILYAS-7 I remember Baybars and Qutuz had prior fought against each other and only worked together due to the Mongols being the greater foe. Then afterward Baybars and his supporters took the chance to kill Qutuz while he was hunting. The amount of infighting and assassinations in the Mamluk Sultanate was insane
Thank you for amazing and non biased videos kings & generals I appreciate it
I'm so early it hasn't been Demonetized yet
Such an underrated Islamic State. Shoutout to the great Ghaznavids!!
They Are OGHUZ TURKS 🇹🇷!
Long Live İslam
This channel is #1.Learned so much interesting hstory!
@@aydakutay3280 Greetings to our Turk and Turkic brothers. They've done so much for the sake of Islam ❤
@@th0r_0dinson loot and destruction
Legacy of gurid empire
Wouldn’t emphasize the great part
Learnt so much about my own name, a great watch! Very much looking forward to part 2 ;)
Ooo Ghaznavidz vs Seljuk Turks things are getting more and more interesting I cant wait to see this one. One of the most underrated subjects of Turkic history. I recommend you to make video of Mughal empire and Sultan Baburs life next time. And of course Taj Mahals story.😀
@@olumluhayatbugunvarsinyari1326 😂
Babur never claimed to be Sultan doe.
@@BIGMrighthere he is a malik
@@omgbruhohhellnahmanwtfman9558 he was a "Shah"
@@Argynov его прадед Тамерлан был Эмир
I was waiting for this episode from beginning.
As a Karluk turk (uzbek) I feel the history of our ancestors
History of your ancestors starts with Genghiz The Mongol
@@payambeigi1689u are barbarian 😂 our slave 😂
@@payambeigi1689tazik
@@payambeigi1689😂😂😂😂 from Uzbekistan
Excellent programming! Thanks K&G 👍
Respect to Ghaznavid! He was also a powerful undefeatable commander in the world! He attacked different parts of South Asia 17x and was successful with all of them!
Ghaznavid are Mamluk Turkic Alp Tigin governor of Samanid Dynasty Tajik !
@@rafliysafariy9820stfu its afg
Somnath temple was rebuild again after India got independence
@@shafqatishan437 India is reaching mars and you are still trying to break the time.
All right,but by the time you do that we will have another temple on Mars lol
@@shafqatishan437 keep dreaming. We have endured worse calamities and torment.
We cannot be vanquished.
@@shafqatishan437 haha keep dreaming jihadi
@@lakshaynegi82 "InDiA iS rEaChInG mArS" abey loru, Mars pe jaa kr kia ukhaar liya tum logon ne han? 🤣 khud ki 25% se zyada population ghurbat se neechy ki zindagi guzar rahi hy aor ye bc is baat pr khush hain k Mars pr pohanch chuky hain LMFAO
@@shafqatishan437 When , since 70 years gazwa e hind is pending , last time in 1971 pakistan tried gazwa e hind , they lost their half :)
Should have included more on the Hindu Shahan of Kabul, the last Hindu Dynasty in Southern Central Asia. Jayapala and Anandapala put up quite a fight against the Ghazanavids.
Hindu word didn't exist then.
Jaypal was last Punjabi Rajput hindu Ruler of modern day Afghanistan and northwest Pakistan. He fought graciously against Pashtun and Turk warriors but couldn't save the integrity of Hindu shahi kingdom
@@NightRider0101 Kudos to your Knowledge 👍
@@AWMuSick hes actually right, the word hindu was coined somewhere around 16th/17th century. The original word was sindhu(people of sindh). The persians used to call them hindu, hence came forth the word hindu.
Hindu is more like a nationality than religious identity.
@@animedubbed7982 16-17th Century ? You sure ? 😂😂😂 Google Hindu Shahi Dynasty and look at the Ruling Period it is indeed termed by Persians but you are terribly misinformed on the Century and Dates, that's why my Congratulations to him and you for Enlightening me 🙏🏼
The founder of the Saffarids, precursors to the Safavids and Ghaznavids, was a coppersmith who moved and became a warrior who eventually gained enough power to become independent.
Saffarid is origin Persian Sunni Muslim Persian Sistan and Tabaristan and Safavid is Azeri Turkish Azerbaijani Shi'ite Muslim not 💯Persian !
Saffarid fought against the khilafat e Abbasia isn't that bad
@@zxera9702 saffarid sunni muslim(persian)
ghaznavid sunni muslim(turkic)
The mix of Turks and Persians is pre historical as legend of shahnameg and turaan iran wars. Stories of bijan and manijeh and rostam and afrasib
@@farzinfrank2553 Rostam and Sohrab the Tajik men?
Excellent ! I have s request , if possible make a video about the Ghurids.
Commander of the faithful, wali amir al-muminin, sword of Allah, holy Warrior, Sultan of the east, Yamīn ad-Dawlah Abul-Qāṣim Maḥmūd Ibn Sebüktegīn. 17 legendary campaigns, 0 defeats. Great video!
Khālid ibn al-Walīd ibn al-Mughīra al-Makhzūmī was a great Muslim hero, a warrior, a gazi, a mujhid! May Allah subhanahu wa ta'ala, bless him, his family, reward him and grant him the highest rank in Jannah.
Sword of allah is khalide ibn al walied not some slave
@@محمددد-ض9ظ just because he is a slave doesn't mean he's less than any person because of islam.
Seljuq Turks enslaved arabs for 500 years, until their british and french boyfriends saved them in the 1900s.@@محمددد-ض9ظ
As always! great video
Yes! We need more of these kinds of videos by K&G on the Islamic Golden Age!
Mahmud Ghaznavi is so under rated. I've read a bit about him, the guy was crazy and inttresting.
I search you 1st before anyone else.
Comprehensive, straight forward, and elaborate. I've recommended you to many history students.
Wanted to know if you all are going to do any playthroughs of crusader kings III or banner lord. I would love to see you wipe the floor with what you have accumulated.
This is a great video and explains how memluks formed. I am waiting for their Egypt Era.
Also you pronounce names nearly perfect. I believe you make a research for how names sound?
I think you should tell about the war between the Gokturks and the Sassanids.(628 Goktürks Sassanids war)Also, the Gökturks won the Mongols in four of the four wars and expelled them from Central Asia.(Göktürks Juan juan wars)
really appreciate it bro, salam from Dagestan!
Hi
Salam.from Ghazna ,,
Kings and Generals never disappoint any one.
Well commented by Abdullah
The opportunity for social mobility which islam provides is unmatched throughout history . Slaves becoming great kings was very common throughout medieval islamic history . Other than the Ghaznavids , we have Mamluk ( Slave ) dynasty of Egypt ruling it for nearly three centuries . We have Mamluk dynasty in India , established and ruled by the former slaves of the Ghorid king Muizuddin . Malik Amber etc ... You won't find this change of fortunes from zero to hero in other cultures . The slavery which was practiced by muslims was radically different from western notion of slavery . Islam gave slaves their proper rights and commanded it's adherents to treat them well .
Don't forget the Mamluks of Egypt and Iraq as well.
So what dumbass , raping , pillaging and destroying was common in Islam as in any other
Yalan
@@mesutozer9296 katiksiz yalan ( undiluted lies )
Complete nonsense as usual
It was very tragic incident in Indian history Somnath temple was rebuilt after Indians independence In 1947 still some remains of the old temple are available on the site . I have visited the temple In Gujarat .
Someday the faithful will destroy the demonic lair again.
@@vitorpereira9515 in Sha Allah
@@sami123yz The Believers must join forces to purge the world of idolatry's darkness. It's the will of God!
@@vitorpereira9515 That includes idols of Mary and Jesus as well ....
Inshallah
@@vitorpereira9515 how cucked must you be to support Mudslims.... who hate Xtians
Great as always, a video series on the ethiopian kingdoms would be great as well.
Ghaznavid empire was glorious times in afghan history. They are loved beyond imagination to those day. Some of the best scientists and poets came from this area
But They are Turkic
@@baheditsTr You realize that 1/3 of all Afghans are of Turkic or mongoloid origin like the Hazara, Uzbek, Kyrgyz, Turkmen, Pashai..... and they're not a tiny minority because the rest 70% is divided into two with 40% being Pashtuns and 30% being Tajiks. Funnily the Pashtuns and Tajik of Afghanistan probably have way more Turkic blood than any Turk from Turkey.
@@shab3883Because 60% of the Turks in Turkey are Oghuz Turks, 40% of the population is Kurds and Anatolian peoples
The Ghaznavid state is a Turkic state because olf Turkish was spoken within the dynasty and the military system was the Turkic system, they wrote works in Turkic, the Mongols lived as tribes at that time, there were no Mongols in Central Asia, they were tribal in North China and Mongolia.
this state was formed by Qarluk Turks and Turkmens, the culture was only Persian, the Iranian states were ruled by the Turks for a long time, but they do not accept it
And today they are making propaganda and showing many Turkic states as Iranian states in history books 😂
Ghaznavids is 🇺🇿🇹🇲
My Iranian Turk friends know how you are doing assimilation policy
How logical is it to steal the history of a nation and make them look like an Iranian state?
@@Khorasan_Turco Buddy, where did you get, your information from? You’re ass? Because the Ghaznavid's judicial and legislative courts were all in Persian (Dari), they followed Afghan customs, norms, and traditions. They were Hanafi Sunnis just like guess who else, the Afghans. And unlike you, I have sources to back my claims.
“Although the dynasty was of Central Asian Turkic origin, it was thoroughly Persianized in terms of language, culture, literature, and habits[e][55][f][56] and has been regarded as a "Persian dynasty".” Wikipedia, Ziad 2006 p.294 and Meisami 1999 p.143.
Regarding their tactics, you claimed something beyond stupid “They used Turkic tactics”, what are Turkic tactics supposed to refer to, did Turks use some unknown tactics which no one else had devised? Furthermore, it would be best if you were humiliated and ashamed because not only did they not use you’re ambiguous Turkic tactics but instead used Arab traditions.
“Like the other dynasties that rose out of the remains of the Abbasid Caliphate, the Ghaznavid administrative traditions and military practice came from the Abbasids. The Arabian horses, at least in the earliest campaign, were still substantial in Ghaznavid military incursions, especially in dashing raids deep into hostile territory. A record of '6000 Arab horses' being sent against King Anandapala in 1008, and evidence of this Arabian cavalry persists until 1118 under the Ghaznavid governor in Lahore.[51]”
As for addressing you’re beloved Turk blood and genealogy, the pussy Turks (Ottomans) that got pounded by Afghans and the whole of the Balkans, unfortunately for you, have very small levels of Turkic blood and in some cases it’s non-existent. They are Islamized Anatolian Greeks, and their physical appearance further reinforces this undeniable fact. Turkic people have a more Asian look, but I don’t see that in any Turk, in fact, if you had researched, the country with the purest Turks like the original forefathers is Afghanistan, where because mountains have been secluded from the rest of the world and have maintained their blood unmixed.
And coming to your Iranian friend. No one cares about or cares about his bum ass. Finally, don’t try teaching me about Mongols or Turks because my knowledge is beyond your puny brain.
@@Khorasan_Turcoghaznavid aren’t either iranian or turkic, mahmud ghazni was from a city called ghazni in modern day afghanistan, his mother was from zabul YOURE the one stealing afghan history the court language of ghaznavid empire was dari you can’t claim a whole empire that is afghan as turkic, mind u there are native turkic people such as hazaras in afghanistan living for millennium LOL
Salam from Karluk Turks. 🇺🇿 to Kipchak (🇰🇿🇰🇬) and oghuz(🇹🇷🇹🇲🇦🇿
The Idol breaker? we need him once more to break K-pop idols and their fans.
that title would make him sound like he is some kinda idol hunter or idol fucker in Japan :D :D
10/10 would be a great hentai to watch
His army was defeated multiple times in India
@@Shahanshah.Shahin hahaha whose army? Mahmud Ghaznavid army? He invaded India 17 times and declared as the conqueror wherever he went in India. You better not to follow your local history teacher and read some unbiased historians.
@@edmbkn5258 conqueror by whom? Your islamic historians? Yeah pretty unbiased I have say.
The first holder of the title of Sultan.
Wasn't the title first held by the Samanids? As far as i know thry are the first official sultanate
@@thestatistician6076 I think the Samanids took the title of Emir/Amir (king) only. They had a 'kingdom' but not a Sultanate.
@@BIGMrighthere as far as i know amir was common among many governors, but i will check, cuz in arabic, i found it as Sultan
@@BIGMrighthere in the english, it is written just that he was acknowledged as a ruler, but in the minted coins ( as far as i could read) there was the title of "ملك", King written by the side of his name, which is a bit odd, as no ruler in islam is allowed to claim that title, as long as there is a caliph again maybe i read it wrong, but that is what i could get.
@@thestatistician6076 An Emir/King is not a Sultan/Authority, but a Sultan can still be an Emir. Judging from wikipedia, Samanids had an Amirate/Emirate.
mmh, more Turkic Emperors.
Everything you mentioned is 100% true!It is completely same as in our history school books in Pakistan 🇵🇰.Hats off to you !Mahmoud Ghazna is known in Pakistan as Sultan Mahmood Ghaznavi.He is one of the most famous and appreciated Muslim leader
Rajasekar Srinivasan hahaha it is in history that your so called preachers offered bribery to leave the temple but we hate bribery and it is hated in every religion so go to Kashmir and see your humanity
@@ahmadibrahim5112 Don't cry when we destroy mosques , we are just tasting the medicine you brought :)
Rajasekar Srinivasan Lagta hai aap ko ghussa aagya hai 😂
Rajasekar Srinivasan Should we stop now ?
@@ahmadibrahim5112 ZUBOY or inn jese idol worshipers ke han jo bacha peda hota hai wo Mehmood Ghaznavi Rehmaullah ka darr le ker peda hota hai, chotay se bachay ke samnay naam lo wo chalang maar ke agay pichay dekhta Mehmud Sultan to nae agay😂
Nice
Europe,North Africa, Middle East/west Asia, central Asia and South Asia all of these regions are interesting for me I always learn about these regions because it seems like they were connected in history to each other
Над Ближний Востоком, Ираном, Пакистаном и Индией, 800 лет правили Тюрки выходцы из Средней Азии
"ایک ہی صف میں کھڑے ہو گںۓ محمود و عیاز
نہ کوئی بندہ رہا اور نہ کوئی بندہ نواز "
اقبال
Aha... Kiya bat hai
@@nohyani321 شکریہ بھائی
yes
🔥🔥🔥
💓💓💓
Turkic history is awesome
@@jackcc429 Better fix the corona before talking about other countries economies.
@obsexo zerzual to be honest it ended. Turkey is still going strong but Central Asia is not relevant anymore sadly
@outlawfly Founders,rullers,mostly army was Turkic
obsexo zerzual What the F do Big hazel eyed Mediterranean Turkish people have to do with Central Asian nomads ??? They are not the same people. If you want to see what an original Turk looks like then go to Kazakhstan
@मलेच्छ मोमिन True
Really interesting subject. Been a fan from 200k. Nice.
Ghaznavids: Started from the bottom now we here
Do you have have any recommendations for books detailing governance of Islamic eastern kingdoms during this era? I'm interested especially in how the Muslim conquerers ruled Delhi in that era.
India in the persianate age is one of the best for covering Islamic rule in India.
Thanks for introducing us to historical research
When you study history of Central Asia you feel like there is a *spawn point* somewhere at northern Himalayas 🤨
from 1000 b.c. to late 18th century there been dozens of Iranic or Turkic migrations westwards to the Central Asia region.
Scythians, tocharians, Han, parnian, yeuzhi, hephthalites, uyghurs, Alans, mongols, afghans and russians.
Someone have to patch it this spawn point is such a bug.
I'm North Indian. belongs to Huns- khusans ancestory
Alans??
What a great time to learn about the Ghaznavids when you're playing as Ghurid Sultanate in MK1212 AD😆
excellent videos recently bro ghaznavids and ottoman-portuquese wars keep them coming pls!
This Persinite Empire is something I heard recurringly in History but I had no concrete Idea of this entity. Well explained and wonderful video again.
Karakhanids and Ghaznavids rulers were both Karluk Turkic
Love The vid
The tale of the slave-turned-emperor Sabuktegin is a fascinating and awesome epic of struggles hardships of life, a tale wich would not be possible if Sabuktegin didn't play Raid:Sahdow Legends, the most ambitious...
This is awesome I was just playing as this faction in medieval 2 total war broken crescent
Just a quick thanks - love your work!
Ghaznavids are of Turkish origin. Before the Ghaznavid State, there were Turkish communities in Afghanistan, and the Ghaznavid State was founded largely on the basis of these communities. Sebük Tigin, the founder of the Ghaznavid State, became a Muslim when he came to the Samanid homeland as a slave (Gulam). At that time, the identity of a state was named according to its rulers. According to Sebük Tigin's Pend-Nâme (advice book), he is from the tribe of "Barsahlılar" in Turkestan. Sebük Tigin was bought by the Samanid Emir Alp Tegin as a "Turkish Slave". Abu'l Gazi Bahadır Han states that Sebük Tigin, the father of Sultan Gazneli Mahmud, was from the Kayı clan.
Stfu its afg
"Ghaznavids looted the temple 17 times"
Maybe they should have spend their gold on military too
@@Archer89201 govt of India collect tax from temples(not from churches and mosques)
Country don't get rich by giving freebies but by jobs
@@Archer89201 their is a huge huge difference in today's economy vs that time
@Siraj Haq whatever pleases you
They said they invaded INDIAN LANDS 17 times. Not that they looted that one particular temple 17 times. :] Learn to listen and understand words.
@@Archer89201 the church is the largest land holder in India. And I am not even counting the lands they are holding illegally
Good explanation 👍
Would be great if you include there wars with Hindu Shahis which were really epic and how Muslims who were not able to conquer any land , not even Afghanistan except Sindh is also a battle worth of mentioning as there were able to capture Spain but not even Afghanistan as Hindu Shahis were dominating force in that area
1000 years later today, Somnath temple stands tall and rich while ghazni is a poor desert town. Looted wealth doesnt last forever.
Al-Baqarah: Prostrate, you fool 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
you still hold grudge the thing that happened 1000 years ago??? grow up dude
They also return to thier r*pe culture.. The reason why muslims invaded them in the first place.. But that's the kind of a culture you will have when you idolise perverted deities
@@pholail7581 facts +++
@@pholail7581 facts +++
I have not started and i am already excitted. Thanks for sharing our history. I have read some chapters of Beihaghi's history, which was written at that time
المسلمين ليس الأتراك
لأن السلطان محمود تم تعيينه من قبل خليفة المسلمين العام في بغداد
@@тамим_алзоаи I do not understand
These conqueror left a great impact in the region of Subcontinent and Central Asia. They are one of the reasons why Pakistan and Turkey shares such a strong bond to this day despite sharing no borders. I would like you to give details about their administrative skills and how effectively they manage their empires for so long. For example one of his famous general Ayaz who was the governor of Lahore and known for his administrative skills.
LOL cute the vast majority of Pakistan is of Indian decent sweetheart not of Turkic decent
@@roshant6964 i never said vast majority of Pakistanis are of Turkic descent. I don't know why are you assuming that.
Bollywood and moosewala more famous in pak than turkish ertrugul. Many pak singers atif asam, rahat fateh ali are very famous in india.
He did left a great impact in India , Hindus realized that like they gave land to zoros , those zoros who talked about how their whole culture and civilization as raped and converted weren't exaggerated
@@zuboy4272 what??😄
We muslims ruled turk or arab doesn’t matter all are equal
@@olumluhayatbugunvarsinyari1326 yemeni
@@mohammedsulaiman5566 salam bro! ur yemeni ?wow , bro how is yemen?
Nice video