The Hindu genocide by the Muslims is a forgotten nearly undocumented story, if possible please show the Hindu and Sikh resistance to Islam in India (nothing against Muslims only the violent side of Fundamentalists highlighted here, the past violence of course)
@@muslimresponse103 well you are entitled to your opinions and so are they, academia has a large divide based on propaganda - especially in History and social sciences. Its usually people pick sides based on ideology, Religion, etc. and build their beliefs further - nothing much wrong because this help prevent brainwashing, but thats how things are As for if there was or not a genocide - India/ Hinduism is the sole remaining major polytheistic Religion/ Civilization - says the violence it survived. The rulers - from their loot of Somnath Temple to Jahangir killing the Sikh Guru and Aurangzeb documenting his details of the violence against kafirs/non believers (Hindus), from Timur to the permanent destruction/razing of Hampi, says it all !! when the tyrants themselves recorded what they did in the name of Religion, when this channel itself mentions how the fellow got his life saved by "conversion to Islam" - then why the denialism??
Now make a video about how qasim ordered the massacre of 500 million hindu residents of sindh and later defeated by glorious hindu king bappa rawal who went on to capture modern day egypt and israel where hindus and jewish people of brahman decent first met ❤
@@aurangzebalamgir8050 well, counter with logic. The indian subcontinent was not one, it had thousands of kingdoms , they just invaded one and that too many compelling evidence suggest that there were muslim converts who enabled such an invasion and of course there were islamisation in Afghanistan and Pakistan border regions as well.
as someone from the city of hyderabad sindh i have heard about the tales of muhammad bin qasim and raja dahir we still have the castle of raja dahir in our city called "pakka qila"
@@frankfernandes718 actually he was much of a coward who called foreigners to save his trade cogs from the pirates and lost his kingdom due to his tyranny against his own people who preferred arab rule over his tyranny
This crucial topic is mentioned only in 1-2 lines in Indian history and you have covered it so well, so really thanks for that. As usual the reasons for the defeat was lack of unity and withdrawal of many of the feudalators from the Sindhi side.
Lol pathetic excuses. Foreigners, (including my Afghan forefathers) , ruled over india for 1200 years. You miserable people had 1200 years time to rebell and oust the foreign rulers. But you were never able to do that you because you're weak against foreigners. In the 16th century, only 9000 Afghans from the Sur Empire ruled over approximately 30 million indians. Lol, and you loser still make disunity a scapegoat for your humiliation? Lol you pathetic loser.
@@surajdubey1047 the caliphate was having internal rebellions therefore the full force and focus was not on india had it khalid ibn al walid he could have not left an inch on india unconquered rather he would have penetrated far east to china and not even they could stand against him
@@surajdubey1047 no you didn't. The Muslims successfully annexed modern day Pakistan, which was the core region of the Indus civilization. The rest of india was irrelevant and not civilized. Moreover, a few number of Muslims conquered and ruled over india for 1000 years. indians are extremely weak against foreigners
The Iberian campaign of the Umayyad have always overshadowed the story of the Sind conquest. Thank you for telling an important chapter of Muslim's early expansion to India.
This was not your bhart mata. This is the history of sindhu . historical and real sindhu only consists of sindh punjab kashmir Balochistan Afgania and some micro area of rajsthan kutch area is also included in sindhu
The only thing the followers of the religion of peace seem to be doing since the days of muhammad is jihad. They love military expansion & conquests yet cry & moan about western imperialism
I love when people from regions covered in a K&G video post. Usually to say that the information is correct! It honestly happens a lot. I'm glad the channel gets so much right and can show the history of so many places. 😎👍
@ᗩTTᖇI ДΓΓЯI I have read about him. He helped expand Sindh into Balochi territory and Siraiki (Baloch-Punjabi) lands. He made Sindh a power house which showed power of Sindhis people. Later on Sindh was also somewhat of a power state under Talpurs.
Battle of Rajasthan 738 AD : Emir Junaid vs Hindu Alliance of Bappa Rawal + Dantidurga + Nagabhatta This was the most decisive victory that prevented Islamic Conquest into India for 500 years untile Battle of Tarain in 1192.
@@akiogood4712 Yes the Delhi Sultanate began in 1206 and lasted till 1526. It was followed by Mughal Empire from 1526 to 1757. But I am talking about 8th Century not 15th. 738 was the first official invasion into India which was repelled by an Alliance of Indian Kings.
@@akiogood4712 And yes the Suri Empire even though Short lived ruled over millions of Indians. (Even though the concept of India as a unified Country did not exist at that time)
@@Storifiedyt the first Muslim Invasion was not repelled. The Muslims successfully annexed modern day Pakistan, which was the core region of the Indus civilization.
@@akiogood4712 that's just not even remotely true, Muslim rule in India lasted for about 500 years and not all of India was under Muslim rule at one time, for example southern India was ruled by Hindu kings mostly
I love the increase in production and quality I am very greatful that this is all for free thank you and all the people who worked on these series from the bottom of my heart also will you continue the Hannibal series?
@No Boxing No Life lmfao. The very concept of religion was given to china by India. It was an indian hindu brahmin convert buddhist who created kung fu
The Hindu Emperor of Sindh Dahir fought valiantly like a mammoth himself but it was his men who drifted in the middle of the war and his elephant which got wounded caused his fall. He almost won the war yet lost it eventually. Dahir to this day is remembered as the last Hindu King of Sindh.
I love to see how the caliphate army evolved.. the started to use heavy armor for cavalry and infantry and they use advanced tactics like the Romans and the Persians
They just realize that despite almost fanatical belief that fueled their desire for conquest they can still be skewered by a spear even if they are on horseback..
@@ashapuhin9825 Every warrior has to have strong faith and strong will to fight.. fighting is spiritual before it comes physicall you must have a strong heart and mind to defeat your enemy.. the Arabs just realized they they just can't relay on tribal warriors all the time they have to have a professional standing army that is ready to fight at all times.. the tribal element is still present and largely successful throughout all Islamic armies
@@madeachanneljustcauseican3968 he spoke of them generalized, the caliphate generally refers to 4 nations: the rashidun, umayyads, abbasids, and ottomans. There are more or less depending on who you ask, a shia would count the fatamids and maybe would not recognize the umayyads as a caliphate for killing the prophet (SAW)'s grandson.
Raja dahir was pious man na ?? Cmonn seriously ‘ what he did to muslim womens ? Every single muslim hate hajjaj bin yusuf he killed thousands of muslims ! But hajaj jaisa zaalim insan bhi raja dahir ki harqat ki wjah se gairat khaa geya jab woh ladki ne akar bataya k raja dahir or uske cronies ne kya salook kiya traders or hajj travellers k saath ‘ mostly logon ko kidnap krke prison mei daala ‘ or womens k sath jo harqtein ki ‘ hajaj jaisa zaalim bhi ronay laggya or promise kiya apne ap se k dahir ko sabak sikhaunga pehla group bheja failed withdraw dusra group bheja pushed back failed ! Jab naye group ko bhejne laga toh ruler ne mana kardia k tune already treasury ko itna nuksan pahunchaya ab nahi hajaj ne request ki or promise kiya k jitna mai kharcha krunga usse 10x jydaa wapis krungaa ‘ hajaj ne firr apnee bhateeje qasim ko bheja ‘ he succeeded and killed raja dahir nd sent his head back to hajaj ! Toh one sided story na bataya kro poori story bataya kro k raja dahir bhi lower chracter ka ruler tha
Well, Thats the standard practice in those times.. Even among Non Muslims. I wouldn't hate them for that, I would hate them for how they treated the women and children, They were all sold into slavery.
The best and most detailed explanation of the fall of Sindh till date. Your narration style and accompanying graphics are very good. Thank you for the video.
Because people, to an extent have the sense to know that wars bring no good. Sitting in front of a pc and playing games is not a very productive thing, but it's a million times better than going around killing people in the name of your pride. But do you have the mental clarity to understand this?
@@fireheart775 i don't mean, you should take ur weapon and go fight people, i mean that men before took their responsibilities more serious than men today.
Love to my arab brothers from india if you don't know today's sinario than understand that today's sindh state was under Caliphate ans today's punjab in Pakistan and in India is under hindu and budhhist king's
@@Aragon-doh racist ..it's ur religion teaches u to divide on the basis of race and cast ...Islam gave us statement"no any Arab is superior than any non Arab and vice versa😂😂😂
That’s gonna be a while I think because they’re doing the conquest of Spain and then after that the siege of Constantinople and then right after that they have to probably go all the way to covering the Abbasid revolution properly with his battle such as the river Zab in order to get to the battle of Tyler‘s which I’m sure they will do I can’t wait I love the Abbasid Revolution video but I want to see everything in full detail not to mention the famous battle of tours with Charles the hammer Martel the seventh century had never mind the eighth century had so many incredible battles let’s all enjoy them
And now Muslims cry victim over Hindus ruling them :D The Ummah is enslaved by America, China, and India, while being abused by countries like Burma and Sri Lanka :)
@@silentstorm718 No one cries in India other than the Hindus who claim injustice and say that Muslims killed their ancestors and I forgot the Hindus in Pakistan, Bangladesh and Kashmir 😭😭😭 cry too
@@حٌفِّيِّدِأّلَفِّاروِقِ-خ8ص That's why Muslims cry on the global stage about Kashmir and supposed impending gen0cide in India. Our brothers in Burma handled the situation well and the Ummah cries about it but is powerless against our Dharmic unity.
No. alexander the great was 20 when he started his campaigns, which were far more successful. and like other young conquerers and military leaders it was only possible because of the civil and military infrastructure that their predecessors laid down as well as their numerous advisors.
Im from Karachi , Sindh , Pakistan which is near the Ancient Port of Debal where the Battle was fought ! Thank you for covering the history of our region, would love to see the 1857 Rebellion next !
It was not a rebellion(as British calls that) pls don't say that , it was first battle of freedom aazadi from the peoples of that soil. Love from ur neighbor 🇮🇳
Raja Dahir and his warriors who were your ancestors fought valiantly to defend your Prophets kin againsts the murderous Mir Qasim. Today instead of hailing Raja Dahir u sing Kaseedahs for Mir Qasim an Arab
@@jaibholenath6900 ye purra pak hi madrasha hi se padhe hai to kya bola jai. Ye gajni ko bhi apna allah mante hai jabki wahi enki metii me khoon massacre kiye tha🤦
Excellent can’t wait to see the famous battle of Guadalete however I hope you guys also cover in the next video how the famous Arab commander Muhammad Ibn al Qassim died shortly after his conquest of the sindh kingdom after caliph Suleiman came to the throne
The killing of Muhammad bin Al-Qasim / Qutaiba bin Muslim / Abdulaziz bin Musa + his father and Tariq bin Ziyad were removed at the hands of Suleiman bin Abdul-Malik، You need a special episode after completing the conquests in the time of Al-Waleed bin Abdul-Malik
@@ناصر-خ9ر These guys are already going to do their Arab conquests of Spain I think they’ll cover that as well because one of the more important individuals mentioned in this video all Hajaj there’s an important pivotal character I’m sure they will be covering their and I know that Solomon definitely was involved in their debts because he didn’t like al Hajaj
Actually Musliims did a favor to hiinduus in SOUTH ASIA when they arrived. .. It was only way for Muslims to make hinnduus civilised. otherwise hiinduus in lndia would still be cannibaIs & accustomed to eat each others deceased & decomposed fIesh till todate. Muslim did good job & hiinduus in modern day lndia( There was no lndia before 15th August 1947). Hindus in India should be grateful to their Muslims massterrs to show Iindus the ray of light & make Iiindus quit cannibaIism. Thank You!!😁
@@ناصر-خ9ر musa and tariq were removed by the dying Walid bin Abdul Malik himself. As for qutayba and Mohammed bin qasim they were part of entourage of hajjaj and he wanted to remove sulayman from the line of succession because of walids choice
@@MohamedMohamed-ws7mq Note in my reply that I differentiated between the case of Musa bin Naseer, the case of Qutaiba and Muhammad bin Al-Qasim, but Al-Waleed summoned Musa only, but Suleiman was the real isolator and the elimination of the family after the killing of Abdulaziz
As an Arab I'm surprised that Indians are still getting butthurt about this conquest after over 1000 years! You do realize there was no international laws, united nations or even a real sovereign countries back then don't you?? It was the time of empires! You win some and you lose some. We also lost to Mongols later in 1258 when Baghdad was sieged and hundreds of thousands of Muslims (Mainly Arabs) were killed but you don't see us here trying to fabricate history....
Indians aren't angry because of you, Arabs. They have been much troubled by the converted! They have split Pakistan into two in 1971 but problems still remain and they'll be sorted out sooner or later. With your nations, India has excellent relations. Cheers!
@@ranjittyagi9354 and Britishers were our chacha buajis for letting us distribute our home into segments of religion. Be wise and humble in your observation on religious history, then you'll know what's fake and what's wane.
@@raghav5903 it brought people to consciousness , they stopped worshipping phallus in name of culture and holding ancestors bs faith of worshipping pokeomns like ganesjha and hanuman , the pagan culture of kamkhya and khajurao is nothing to boast on just a blot on human history the immoral and illogical pagan tradition nowadays called hinduism is a collection of all kind of worship done in subcontinnet , myths are being told a shistory , ancient comics like ramayana and mahabharat are taughtaas history by h!ndus nowadatyys , aryans were truly master of making natives fool , there is a reason greek god and indian god have so nuch similarity , u guys were fooled and forcefully converted by aryans to worship phallus and pokemon
Can you make a video on 'Kabul shahan' kingdom of Kabul who stood against Arab expansion for over 250 years? Yaqub Leith al Safar invaded Kabul after a betrayal of the king ended up killing him in a peace negotiation.
The last Hindu king of Sindh Raja Dahir give a speech before going into the war His words were , " Idefeated them 3 in battle . In 4th battle If I am able to defeat them successfully the roots of my Kingdom & Empire gets more strengthen . But , If I got martyred then I'll be happy because My nation will remember me as a person who give his life for the protection for his Country , Motherland & Hindu Faith " . It's a shame for us that we majority of the people of India doesn't even know his name .
@@x_oj Don't Worry We Demolished Your Pride By Defeating the Arabic Islam . We keep them at Bay for 500 years . Read Your own history written by your historians .
Bappa Rawal allied with other Indian Powers didn't let Umayaad to advance more in India ,after almost 400 years Turks conquered most of India under the banner of Islam
@@indiafirst3676 By Turks he probably meant the Ghaznavids, and Turkic dynasties of the Delhi Sultanate. The sultanate conquered most of India by the time of Muhammad Bin Tughluq, who had mixed Indian & Turkic origins.
@@indiafirst3676Tughlaq was Turks bro. ..do not associate that madman with us indians .. He ain't Aryan .indians are indo - Aryan and Dravidian , with some north eastern tibeto - mongoloid population and minority of indo - scythian ancestry thrown in
Muhammad bin Qasim is considered a person of great importance in the history of Pakistan. To this day we hold great respect for his conquest of Sindh. However, Raja Dahir is also considered a national hero among other nationalists for his bravery against invaders. This makes it a complicated and rhetorical topic. Thank you for bringing up this usually ignored topic of our history. The conquest of Sindh holds great significance in the history of the modern-day Islamic republic of Pakistan as it would form the basis for the spread of Islam in the sub-continent and the further incursions of subsequent Muslim Empires in this region.
@@smooky12 Pakistanis don't care about that. They don't care that their ancestors (Hindus, Buddhists and Jains of Indic Civilization living in the Indus Valley) were slaughtered and humiliated and went through massive cultural and economic degradation. They don't care that these invaders destroyed their own cities, temples, universities, libraries etc. Rather, they celebrate the massacres and destruction and glorify the invaders, all because they spread Islam.
Please make a video on Nagabhatta 1 who defeated umayad caliphate army in battle near kannauj and also battle of Rajasthan where rajput confederacy leader bappa rawal of mewar defeated umayad caliphate and pushed them out of indian sub continent
@@rahmanibrothers1017 Talwar ke daar se salwar pahan lene walon ki koi izzat aur imaan nahi ho sakta. Look the condition of Afghanistan, Pakistan and now kangaladesh. Beggers can't be choosers.
Muhammad bin Qasim was a young Umayyad general who is often credited with leading the Islamic conquest of Sindh (modern-day Pakistan) in the early 8th century. Muhammad bin Qasim was sent to the Indian subcontinent by the Umayyad Caliphate after a plea for help from a woman named Daharsiah or Daharsia, who was captured and dishonored by the local ruler, Raja Dahir of Sindh. The woman reportedly sent a message to the Caliph, asking for help to avenge her honor. In response, the Caliph dispatched Muhammad bin Qasim, who then led a military campaign that resulted in the defeat of Raja Dahir and the annexation of Sindh into the Umayyad Caliphate. This legend has become a part of popular Islamic folklore, symbolizing the protection of honor and justice for women.
It's interesting to see how the unstoppable tide of islam constantly came through the north western Indian region The indians from earlier were much stronger than the ones that fought and lost to the turks, Afghans and mongols
@@maddogbasil man you Have to see about those Cultural Values too... In Our Culture we can't attack backstabbed which was Deep Rooted in Indian Kingdom traditions,and excessively Moralty.. even some Indian Kingdom also helped Turks To destroy other Indian Kingdom as They Signed treaty and Those shit Kingdom values them alot
The Jats of Kikan fought the Arabs for 20 years, successfully crushing them and remaining unconquerable permanently until the Turkic invasions (even then being extremely difficult to fight). Bappa Rawal united the Rajputs and drove back the Arabs to the Iranian plateau, hereby ending in climactic Indian victory over the Muslims.
I'm dieing to see the next episode cause as a Spaniard it always made me curious how could they manage to conquer the peninsula so quickly with so few troops. Im waiting impatiently to have my prejudices wronged and explained.
As someone who studied north african history a lot, the reasons are simple. The conquerors were not all arabs and muslims, the vast majority of them were Berbers and Latins from north africa, most of them were newly recruits and religious zeolotry was not born yet, few years ago they followed arianism ( branch of christianity the promotes the humanity of christ and many believe it is what later developed into Islam ) like many iberians, they also spoke African Latin and it is the reason why spaniards today confuse v with b. It is an African Latin trait, because the Latin there got mixed with Punic from the days of Carthage, Punic like arabic and hebrew tend to mix the sounds v and b. So we have conquerors that share almost the same religion, the same language and have a long history with Iberia, no wonder the native did not feel estranged by these aliens and some even joined them gainst the visigoth from northern europe.
As oppose to the rather northafricanized narrative, that denies the fact that the Visigoth had largely latinize by this point and thru admixture fused with the native hispanoroman population after centhuries since the visigoths had entered Hispania as clients of the Roman state, the inhabitants of Iberia had little in common with the incresingly arabized and islamicized northafrican population, true as it might be that in the urban regions of NA the romance speaking tongues endured for a time, that latin identity would eventually fade away through cultural assimilation to arab muslim society. As for linguistic affinity iberoromace had native influences distinct from the numidian/punic influences in northwestern afroromance languages. Hispanoroman society was at this point predomenantely Catholic, Arrianism was largely a gothic phenomena and with the conversion of the visigothic crown to Catholicism the elite had folded to the latin Church. One does not need to resort to fancifull arguments of "cultural affinity" to explain a conquest, afterall the Huns did not rely on cultural affinity for the conquest of roman territory neither did nomadic mongols had much in common with the vast settle chinese population they ruled upon, the fact is that a rapid conquest by a mobile and effectively lead army on horseback is a common ocurrence in preindustrial history, aided by co-option of local elites, political fragmentation of opponents and in some instances diseases/natural disasters. Neither Pizarro nor Cortez had anything in common with the natives they commanded or conquered, it took a mixture of pragmatism, cunning, audacity and viciousness as in all major conquests, such was the case of the moorish capture of much of Iberia.
islam has much caste any religion on this plant earth. Are you sunni or shia? or ahemdi ? if you are indian, then who are barelvi ? deboabndi ? who? mohammed himseld said only 1 sect will go to jannat rest all will go to jhanum
@@CelebrityPromoters-p5i He was stressing the point of unity. There is virtually no system in Islam that says one group of humans is superior to another simply on the basis of birth. That is Hinduism.
hey! awesome video, found it extremely informative and helpful. Could you please provide the sources with which you researched the topic? I am facing some crisis at finding authentic resources to read about qasim's invasion on sindh.
The Ummayyad Caliphate fought the Gujjar-Pratihara dynasty, which was in much of India during this time. The conflict most likely broke out over a desire to control the Indus River, which has always been an important trade route.😊
@@onso9898 our mythology is many 1000 years older than your Islam. Also I'm taking about WRITTEN RECORDS of the conquest by Arabs themselves. And it will happen again. And this time Muslims will bear the brunt .
7:32 Theodora of Kazararia: "Did you get the throne back?" Justinian II: "Yes" Theodora of Khazaria: "What did it cost you?" Justinian II: "My nose..." *Begins to cry* Theodora of Kazaria: "Don't worry, honey. Now, you truly look like a real Emperador... especially to their busts" 😉 Justinian II: 🖕
First Arab Invasion Of Sindh By Land Routed In Kikan The third ‘pious’ Caliph who succeeded Umar was Usman ibn Affan (644-656 A.D.). Usman wanted to conquer Sindh and made up his mind to dispatch an expedition to invade Sindh. He appointed Abdullah to Iraq and commanded him to send an agent to gather information about Hind and Sindh. Abdullah deputed Hakim to go and acquire the desired information and upon his return, Hakim reported to the Caliph that, “Its water is dark; its fruit is bitter and poisonous; its land is stony and its earth is selfish. A small army will soon be annihilated there and a large army will soon die of hunger.” [The Chachnama: Volume 1 (1900), P 59 - Translated from Persian by Mirza Kalichbeg Fredunbeg] Hearing such a dismal report from Hakim, Caliph Usman abandoned his plan to attack Hind and Sindh. It was during the reign of the fourth Caliph, Ali ibn Abi Talib (656-661 A.D.) who was also the last of the Rashidun Caliphs, that the first invasion of Sindh by land was carried out in 660 A.D. A great expedition, which included many nobles and chiefs, and which was led by Haras, proceeded towards the mountainous region of Kikan or Kikanan unhindered. The state of Kikan was located in the mountainous region in the northern part of present day Balochistan near the Bolan Pass and is mentioned by Hieun Tsang as a region of pastoral people and great mountains and valleys. As the Arab army proceeded, they managed to overpower some of the towns on their way to Kikan, securing “many slaves and a large booty, until they arrived at the mountain Kikanan. Here the natives stood up to fight with them.” [The Chachnama: Volume 1 (1900), P 59 - Translated from Persian by Mirza Kalichbeg Fredunbeg] Kikan was part of the central division of the kingdom of Sindh which was under the direct administration of the king, Raja Chach Rai and was inhabited by the hardy Jats and Meds. The brave Jats and Meds of Kikan put up a tough fight against the Arabian invaders and decisively repulsed the attack. The invading Arab army incurred severe losses and “he (Haras) and those who were with him, saving a few, were slain in the land of Kikan in the year 42 A.H. (662 A.D.).” [The History Of India As Told By Its Historians: Vol. 1 - The Muhammadan Period, P 116 - Elliot And Dawson] The four ‘pious’ Rashidun Caliphs thus died with their dream of victory over Hind and Sind remaining unfulfilled. Six Arab Raids Of Kikan And The Brave Defence By Jats And Meds After the rout of the Arabian army in Kikan in 662 A.D., the region became the chief target of Arab military crusades. The succeeding Caliph Muawiyah I (661-680 A.D.) rebelled against Ali ibn Abi Talib and after his death, wrested power from Ali’s son Hasan and established the Umayyad Caliphate. Although a major part of Muawiyah’s political expansionism was focused on the Byzantine provinces, he nevertheless sent six determined expeditions to conquer the frontier post of Kikan in Sindh over a period of twenty years. None of the expeditions, except the last succeeded and the Arabs failed to make any lasting impact in the region. During all the six raids, there was great slaughter as the locals Jats and Meds fought fiercely to defend their land and repulsed the Arab armies. Caliph Muawiyah despatched Abdullah ibn Sawad to conquer the kingdom of Sindh, appointing him as the governor and chief administrator of Sindh. Muawiyah said to Abdullah, “In the country of Sind, there is a mountain, which is called Kikanan. There are big and beautiful horses to be found there… The people are very cunning, and, under the shelter of that mountain, have become refractory and rebellious.” [The Chachnama: Volume 1 (1900), P 60 - Translated from Persian by Mirza Kalichbeg Fredunbeg] Abdullah proceeded to attack Kikan with a large contingent of 4000 Arab warriors. When they arrived in Kikan, Abdullah and his army were assaulted by the brave Jat and Med soldiers of the provincial chief and fierce battle took place between the two armies. The local people of Kikan also came out in large numbers to fight the marauders. They occupied the mountain passes and the battle raged furiously. Abdullah’s troops were defeated by the valiant and fearless army of Kikan and eventually the army of Islamic Arabs was made to flee to Makran as, “the whole mountainous region became alive with fighting men and the Mussulmans beat a hasty retreat.” [The Chachnama: Volume 1 (1900), P 61 - Translated from Persian by Mirza Kalichbeg Fredunbeg] In 664 A.D. another Arab expedition led by Muhallab ibn Abu Safra advanced upto Banna and Alahwar between Multan and Kabul and proceeded southwards to Kikan but was trounced by the Meds and Muhallab and his men were annihilated. [The History Of India As Told By Its Historians: Vol. 1 - The Muhammadan Period, P 116 - Elliot And Dawson] Upon Muawiyah’s command, Ziyad ibn Abu Sufian, who was the governor of Iraq, appointed Sinan ibn Salamah for the conquest of Sindh. Sinan made his troops take an oath to divorce their wives to keep them from fleeing [Kitab Futuh Al Buldan: Vol. 2, P 211 - Al Baladhuri Tr. By Francis Clark Murgotten] and was able to subdue the Meds and conquer Makran partially in 668 A.D. He established a small garrison in Makran. Ziyad then sent Rashid ibn Amr for the conquest of Kikan but Rashid was slain in a fierce battle with the Meds. Thereafter, Ziyad ibn Abu Sufian appointed Sinan ibn Salamah as the commander of the Arab army for further raids into the frontier provinces of Sindh. Although Sinan had conquered parts of Makran, the local Meds rebelled and only after the raid of Al Bahilli ibn Al Harri, who was sent by Ubaidullah ibn Ziyad, that Makran could finally be conquered by the Arabs in 680 A.D. after a fierce campaign. [Kitab Futuh Al Buldan: Vol. 2, P 212-213 - Al Baladhuri Tr. By Francis Clark Murgotten] There was a period of relative calm in Sindh after 680 A.D. as the Arabs did not dare attack Sindh again for 28 years. They had suffered huge losses and all their invasions barring the last had failed and even that victory was no more than a small foothold in Makran. After a persistent effort of nearly half a century, the world conquering Arabs had failed to make any impact in the frontier provinces of Sindh.
@@ranjittyagi9354 why are you fighting over the fact about the fact that we converted? If you read the process of convertion you'll know that the sect which became muslim (in Indian subcontinent) was the same who weren't sanatani or Jain or Buddhist, they didn't just adhered a faith out of spite, they thought thoroughly. (Just read it on wiki or some non-polarising book) If it makes you feel any better, in school days, i came 4th in a Hanuman Chalisa reciting competition, and tht didn't made me less of a Muslim or Indian.
@@antarakmit4114 first thing thank you for respecting lord hanuman 2d thing bhai thumi hi socho mughal invaders and others raped our women we don't hate you bro you are converted or may not but other ppl are abusing our gods on that day I was very angry on muslims may be your allah told that non Muslims not to come to mecca but still he even told that not to hate other gods hope you understood ❤️🙏
bro dont let these dummy hindus try to demotivate us islam was successfully integrated into indian subcontienent, look how many muslims exist today because of the efforts of all our predecessors who converted from hinduism and became muslim
Hoping to continue the series and show us the reality and factual and tell us how Qasim conquest conceded till Sindh only and the defeats in the hands of Bappa Rawal, Nagabhatta and Vikramaditya II of Early India... And why did there was no Muslim conquests in Indian subcontinent for next 3 centuries...
Yes but this channel mainly focusses on glorifying Islamic conquests and pleasing Muslim audience they are very selective in approach so they will never tell about it in their videos.
@@mtf_savage_beasts2565 They are telling history not glorifying. Our history is glorious, Muslims conquered most of the world and were rulers of the world for centuries. Total domination with small but disciplined army. Your triggering at history will not change anything. Hindu stayed limited to India and Nepal. They were too busy with cows and killing each other in name of caste.
@@mtf_savage_beasts2565 17:00 he did gave reason why Muslims did not invade further. Plus they were happy with getting tributes from Indian rulers so why bother.
@@blackpanthar906 Hindus were not limited to Nepal or India, Hindus were in Philippines, Malaysia, Indonesia, Even in Azerbaijan, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Thailand, Myanmar, Sri Lanka etc. You do know this conquest of ummayad caliphate ended in Failure because "Bappa Rawal" Defeated Ummayad caliphate expansion from Pakistan till Afghanistan.
@@silentstorm718 The battles of Rajasthan 🤣🤣🤣 These are just small raids, idiot, not even battles, because the Umayyad state was engaged in other battles in Africa and Europe, but after a while the Ghaznavid state came and penetrated India and crushed the Hindus in Somanat and demolished the statue above your heads. Stop reading the false Hindu curricula. I think they are They did not mention to you that an Arab leader who was only 17 years old invaded India and brought the Hindus to their knees 🤣🤣🤣🔥👌
@@KingsRightHand In Pakistan, Afghanistan and specially our Persian cousins, we all mock Arabs. Be proud of your identity and learn from us how to keep the deseart rast in their limits.
First Arab Invasion Of India By Land Thwarted At Seistan By 643 A.D. the Arab imperialists had captured Persia and the eastern borders of the Islamic Caliphate had reached the boundaries of Kabul and Zabul. The province of Seistan (Sijistan-Sakastan) on the west of river Helmand was part of the kingdom of Zabul and bordered Khorasan on the north-west. The capital of Seistan was Zarang or Zaranj near Lake Zarah and was governed by the Satrap of the king of Zabul. The kings of Zabul were called Rutbil or Zunbil. The overlord or king of the Satrap was “probably an officer of the line of Indian princes who ruled in the Kabul and Helmund valleys and were variously known to the Arabs as Rutbil, Rantbil and Zunbil.” [The Dynastic History Of Northern India - Vol. 1, P 65 - H. C. Ray] The king was also known as Ranbal, the most common title used by the local populace. For the benefit of the readers, we shall use the epithet ‘Zunbil’. The third ‘pious’ Caliph, Usman (644-656 A.D.) was fired with a religious zeal like his predecessor Umar. He was determined to conquer Hind and Sindh for Islam and uproot idolatory. Under his command, the governor of Basra, Abdullah-ibn-Amir sent his general Ar-Rabi-ibn-Ziyad to conquer Seistan. The first Arab attack on Zabul was carried out by Ar-Rabi in Seistan in 650 A.D. The Arab army was met with fierce resistance by the army of Abarwiz, the Satrap, and suffered huge losses, but eventually managed to defeat the Satrap after a grim and prolonged battle. [Kitab Futuh Al Buldan: Vol. 2, P 142-143 - Al Baladhuri Tr. By Francis Clark Murgotten] Ar-Rabi penetrated deep into Zabul all the way up to Bust. However, he was soon routed and forced out of Seistan by the brave locals, thereby losing all the territories he had gained. [Indian Resistance To Early Muslim Invaders Upto 1206 A.D., P 39 - Dr. Ram Gopal Mishra] Arab Attack On Zarang And Desecration Of Temple Of Zun Abdullah-ibn-Amir was determined to conquer the frontier provinces of Al Hind. He appointed Abdur-Rehman-ibn-Samurah as governor of Seistan in 653 A.D. to conquer Seistan and Kabul. Abdur-Rehman advanced to Zarang, the capital of Seistan, with a large army and laid siege to the castle of the Satrap of Zarang. The Satrap’s army and the inhabitants of Zarang gave Abdur-Rehman a tough fight and a fierce battle followed. After a long and intense battle, the Satrap was defeated, and Abdur-Rehman extracted a heavy tribute from him. Abdur-Rehman captured the city of Zarang and the territories surrounding it. Within a year, the Arab general Abdur-Rehman advanced to the province of Zamindawar with a large army. There was a temple devoted to the Hindu mountain god Zun, believed to be a mountain version of Lord Shiva on top of a sacred mountain in Zamindawar to north of Kandahar. The Hindu god Zun was said to be “the northern mountain form of Shiva or ‘an adaptation of Shiva to a local god, introduced from India,’” [Al Hind: The Making Of The Indo Islamic World, Vol. 1 - Early Medieval India And The Expansion Of Islam - 7th-11th Centuries, P 118-119 - Andre Wink] and the temple of Zun was the most important pilgrimage site of the entire region. Abdur-Rehman surrounded the sacred mountain with the temple of Zun and subjugated the local people, levying a heavy tribute on them. However, his real purpose was iconoclasm, as he took perverse pleasure in desecrating the temple and disfiguring the golden idol of the Hindu god Zun with fanatical zeal. He “went into the temple of Zur (Zun), an idol of gold with two rubies for eyes, he cut off a hand and took out the rubies. Then he said to the Satrap, ‘keep the gold and gems. I only wanted to show that it had no power to harm or help.’” [Kitab Futuh Al Buldan: Vol. 2, P 144 - Al Baladhuri Tr. By Francis Clark Murgotten] Abdur-Rehman had to withdraw from Seistan due to internal civil dissidence in the Caliphate of Usman, which resulted in the First Fitna or religious war of Islam and eventually led to the overthrowing of the Rashidun Caliphate and the establishment of the Umayyad Caliphate. Abdur-Rehman appointed Umair-ibn-Ahmar in his place to govern the conquered territories of Seistan. However, soon after Abdur-Rehman departed to Arabia, the local inhabitants of Zarang rejected the Arab Islamic rule. “Subsequently the people of Zaranj expelled Umair and closed the town” to the Arabs. [Kitab Futuh Al Buldan: Vol. 2, P 144 - Al Baladhuri Tr. By Francis Clark Murgotten] Arabs invade Kabul And Zabulistan Early on in his reign, the first Umayyad Caliph, Muawiyah (661-680 A.D.) appointed Abdur-Rehman-ibn-Samurah as governor of Seistan once again with the aim of conquering Kabul and Zabul. Led by Abdur Rehman, a large Arab army laid siege to Kabul. After a long siege extending over a month, the Arab army stormed Kabul and finally managed to take possession of Kabul. But “the king of Kabul made an appeal to the warriors of India and the Musalmans were driven out of Kabul. He recovered all other countries and advanced as far as Bust.” [The History Of India As Told By Its Own Historians, Vol. 2 - The Muhammadan Period, P 415 - Elliot And Dawson] The king of Kabul, however agreed to pay an annual tribute to keep the Arabs at bay but over time he withheld the tribute to the Arabs. From Kabul, the Arab invaders marched on to Zabul and after a fierce battle, managed to defeat the people and get a foothold in Zabul. The success of Zabul was also shortlived for the Arabs. Soon afterwards, Abdur Rehman was called back to Basra. Upon his departure, the Satraps of Kabul and Zabul rejected Islam and drove out the Arab Muslims from their kingdoms. The succeeding Arab governor attempted to subdue the region but failed and eventually made a treaty with the Satraps for a stipulated amount of money. [The History And Culture Of The Indian People: Vol. 3 - The Classical Age, P 167 - R. C. Majumdar] Revolt Of Kabul And Slaughter Of Arabs At Junzah In 683 A.D. the people of Kabul revolted under the leadership of the Kabul Shahi king as “Kabul Shah assembled a force to oppose the Moslems and drove out all of them that were in Kabul.” [Kitab Futuh Al Buldan: Vol. 2, P 147 - Al Baladhuri Tr. By Francis Clark Murgotten] Yazid-ibn-Ziyad, the governor of Seistan rushed in with his Arab army to restrain the revolt but his attempt at retribution was crushed by the Kabul Shahi army at the Battle of Junzah and his army was completely routed. Yazid-ibn-Ziyad was killed in battle along with many other prominent warriors of Arab aristocracy and his army was slaughtered in large numbers. Those Arab soldiers who escaped slaughter managed to flee. [The History And Culture Of The Indian People: Vol. 3 - The Classical Age, P 168 - R. C. Majumdar] Around the same time, the Zunbil or king of Zabul also declared war on the Arabs and drove them out of Seistan. The Zunbil captured the Arab general Abu Ubaida and held him hostage and the Arabs had to pay large a very large sum of money to procure the release of Abu Ubaida from the king of Zabul. Yet, in spite of his victory over the Arab army, the Zunbil was defeated and killed in battle in 685 A.D. by Umair-al-Mazini. Zunbil’s son, also titled Zunbil (or Ranbal) continued the war with the Arabs to defend Zabul.
Arab imperialists? the first caliphate was a purely religious movement and it was not about arab supremacy. The umayyads had a racism problem but the rashidun didn't, many non-arabs made up the upper ranks of the followers of the Prophet (SAW). The rashidun were the direct companions and original muslims, the later dynasties were more traditional empires.
You are right about King Dahir. But I request you to make a video on the aftermath of this battle and how Bappa Rawal took the revenge of King Dahir and defeated the Muslims.
So how long will it be for the next expisode about the Umayyad conquest of Hispania to come out? I've been waiting for that episode for like more than three years at least if my memory served me correctly.
Greeks - Gone Ancient Egypt - Gone Roman - Gone Mesopotamia - Gone Aztec - Gone Today no one recalls names of their Gods, No one prays for their ancients. The same forces came to destroy Hindu Civilization but failed because our ancestors never gave up. Eternal Bharata. ❤
Many religion survived of many invasions from foreign invaders. Ancient Chinese Religion is still exist in China. Your hindu religion was nothing in those times. It was like praying everything which they seems or thought supernatural.
Indians/hindus , i have one question , qasim defeated dahir and conquered sindh which led the foundation of islam in subcontinent. This is a historical fact . Ok why are you getting ao triggered and emotional? You have a very long history of empires in subcontinent, be proud of that ... Empire rise and fall , kings come and go ... This happens... Cope with it
Now make a video about how qasim ordered the massacre of 200 million hindu residents of sindh and later defeated by glorious hindu king bappa rawal who went on to capture modern day egypt and israel where hindus and jewish people of brahman decent first met ❤
@@johanliebert3943 thats obviously a lie, the entire world had around 200 million people, how could he kill most of the world population? also its a foolish lie to say that the indians captured land outside of india at that time, egypt never left muslim hands until the age of colonialism. Also israel was ruled by muslims as well, how could bappa meet a people who ruled nothing?
Now make a video about how qasim ordered the massacre of 200 million hindu residents of sindh and later defeated by glorious hindu king bappa rawal who went on to capture modern day egypt and israel where hindus and jewish people of brahman decent first met ❤
@@mrmap4875 Unfortunately, The other generals were jealous of his achievements when he was not over 20 years old, and they stirred up rumors against him until they killed him. If he lived until his 50s or 60s at least he would had conquered all of India
Joke, he co nquered India in his dreams, he could only take Sindh, and Sindh was taken back by Indians in just 10 yrs, Rest of the Arab Invasions were royally de feated by Indians. That is why Arabs could not conq uer rest of India, Is lamic hallucinations and islamic supremacy has made you not accept real history. Sindh was never won in a fair fight, Arabs used slimy de ceit, lying and che ating to win against Indians because they knew Indians can't be de feated in a fair fight. So he was med iocre fight. Allah never blessed him, he blessed the Indians. So it's the Indians who were on fire not Qasim, even after so much che ating and de ceit Qasim lost Sindh to Indians and Indians took back Sindh in just 10 yrs😂. Qasim was a joke in reality. 😂
Well, the Arabs did not achieve anything in India. They tried to invade India but the Arabs were defeated by the south Indian Chalukya Dynasty and the north Indian Pratihara Dynasty. This stopped the Arab expansion in the east
The Umayyad dynasty had very little interest in the East so anything that occurred in the Eastern frontier of the Caliphate could considered boarder skirmish es compared to their Western expansion.
@@cinema6444 well I Ain't Muslim and am a Christian. But I have read history books written about that time period and those attacks were mostly raids for booty and plunder and Muslims won those and took many plunders from Ujjain,Malabar, saurashtra(gujrat) and enslaved many inhabitants and returned. And yes they were border skirmishes. Main focus of Ummayad Caliphate was on invading Azerbaijan which was Christian, Armenian Kingdom, Eastern Roman Empire(Byzantines) who were also Christians and ofcourse Al Andalus (Spain). They were also occupied in naval war and also on land with Christians in Italy especially Sicily Island. This was because many skilled craftsmen lived in Christian kingdoms and conquering Christian kingdoms offered Greater revenue and money in long run than campaigning against Indian kingdoms which would give strain into their finances without any monetary profit in subjecting.
@@debarghapaul866 Hello Paul, it depends on where you study. In Karachi (port city of Sindh) there is a different perspective while in interior there is more Sindh eccentric view. Muhammad Bin Qasim is praised for him bringing Islam. But Raja Dahir is also seen as a hero for resisting invaders. So we from Sindh have more view on this situation than other provinces.
You must also make a documentary on Battle of Rajasthan where Arabs were driven away by The Great Rajput leader Bappa Rawal who was ancestor of great Maharana Pratap along with Nagabhatta and Rashtrakutas particularly Avanijanashraya Pulakesin.. No one dared to attack 300 years after that battle..
Lol you think the Arabs would be scared to attack the weak and dis unified Indian kings. The Umayyad state was unstable because of their racist policies and was later replaced by the Abbasid caliphate,who unlike the Umayyads, were not focused on territorial expansion but in the internal development of the Muslim world. Eventually India was also conquered ( Indus Valley already came under Muslim rule) by the succeeding Turks and afghans.
Thank you soo mch... Was waiting for a long long time to watch a package on this Topic ❤️ love it, i have discovered with new things Really Loves It.❤️
India, also known as Bharat, is the only nation on the planet that still has an 80% non-Muslim population despite being ruled by Muslims for 800 years. Hindu Rajput women committed Jauhar (self-immolation) to avoid capture and enslavement. Sikhs were a warrior class that fought bravely against Islamic expansion in India. The plight of religious minorities living under islamic regimes is a serious concern throughout history and today.
all of u are forcefully converted its make me laugh how all indian subcontinent muslim adore qasim like all your ancestor was forcefully converted and you all behave like u are from arab 😂
@@JackDorsey10 As a Sindhi from Sindh. I consider Raja Dahir brave and loyal because he defended his motherland. No matter he was a hindu. I am muslim and still love him, for his loyalty.
@Unknown Mafia 💀🖕 You are the first one who is praising the people who invaded us. I love my motherland and I will speak for my heroes. Because they belonged to this land where I am born.
@@حٌفِّيِّدِأّلَفِّاروِقِ-خ8صMuslims on Muslim invasion of india,iran Egypt spain:-😆😆😆 Muslim on israel invasion of gaza:- 😢😢we are victim saar we are most peaceful community saar😭😭😭😭
@@humzanafees9348 how can they messed with the Muslims ? When the Arabs were the ones to conquer the land spread it by the sword I'm a Pakistani myself and I'm assuming you are too, you a disgrace to your ancestors
Head to keeps.com/kings to get 50% off your first order of hair loss treatment.
The Hindu genocide by the Muslims is a forgotten nearly undocumented story, if possible please show the Hindu and Sikh resistance to Islam in India (nothing against Muslims only the violent side of Fundamentalists highlighted here, the past violence of course)
Please do cover
Anglo Mysore wars someday
@@muslimresponse103 well you are entitled to your opinions and so are they, academia has a large divide based on propaganda - especially in History and social sciences. Its usually people pick sides based on ideology, Religion, etc. and build their beliefs further - nothing much wrong because this help prevent brainwashing, but thats how things are
As for if there was or not a genocide - India/ Hinduism is the sole remaining major polytheistic Religion/ Civilization - says the violence it survived. The rulers - from their loot of Somnath Temple to Jahangir killing the Sikh Guru and Aurangzeb documenting his details of the violence against kafirs/non believers (Hindus), from Timur to the permanent destruction/razing of Hampi, says it all !! when the tyrants themselves recorded what they did in the name of Religion, when this channel itself mentions how the fellow got his life saved by "conversion to Islam" - then why the denialism??
@@muslimresponse103 Why do you leave your comment under a pinned post on a hair loss prevention product...?!
I beg you please to keep this series going it so good
Something of this quality for free, what a day and age we live in. The golden age of historical content
True
An incredible successor to the old military channel in the us
TRUE
Ikr 10 years ago you either watched the history channel or read a book.
As misinformation spirals out of control lol
6:02 Central Asia
7:20 Anatolia
8:18 Hispania
11:59 Sindh
The Caliphate
@@defneagle.779 yup, kept these timestamps cuz I play modded strategy games
I have studied this topic in Arabic at university and I am impressed how close you stay to the original sources.. Well done!
@precizion_ yah.. Knowledge North is filling a good gap.. Allahumabaarik
Did you also study the rashidun Chalifate?
@@barryirlandi4217 he is 😊
Now make a video about how qasim ordered the massacre of 500 million hindu residents of sindh and later defeated by glorious hindu king bappa rawal who went on to capture modern day egypt and israel where hindus and jewish people of brahman decent first met ❤
@@johanliebert3943 200 mill bro im done
So the Caliphate invaded India and Spain in the same time ??
Damn 🤯🤯
Afghan, sindh , iberia (spain + portugal ) , anatolia at same time
@ᗩTTᖇI ДΓΓЯI then who ruled north india for 600 years?(1198-1800)?
@@indiafirst3676 What ever helps you to sleep at night!
India had thousands of large and small kingdoms then .
@@aurangzebalamgir8050 well, counter with logic. The indian subcontinent was not one, it had thousands of kingdoms , they just invaded one and that too many compelling evidence suggest that there were muslim converts who enabled such an invasion and of course there were islamisation in Afghanistan and Pakistan border regions as well.
as someone from the city of hyderabad sindh i have heard about the tales of muhammad bin qasim and raja dahir we still have the castle of raja dahir in our city called "pakka qila"
Nah bro pakka qilla came way later in the 18th century built by Kalhoras. It does not belong to that period.
The old city and temples were burnt to the ground
King dahir was saviour
@@frankfernandes718 actually he was much of a coward who called foreigners to save his trade cogs from the pirates and lost his kingdom due to his tyranny against his own people who preferred arab rule over his tyranny
@@frankfernandes718 dahir was the reason for defeat. His father Chach was competent leader.
This crucial topic is mentioned only in 1-2 lines in Indian history and you have covered it so well, so really thanks for that. As usual the reasons for the defeat was lack of unity and withdrawal of many of the feudalators from the Sindhi side.
But we managed to Stall the advance into India
Lol pathetic excuses. Foreigners, (including my Afghan forefathers) , ruled over india for 1200 years. You miserable people had 1200 years time to rebell and oust the foreign rulers. But you were never able to do that you because you're weak against foreigners. In the 16th century, only 9000 Afghans from the Sur Empire ruled over approximately 30 million indians. Lol, and you loser still make disunity a scapegoat for your humiliation? Lol you pathetic loser.
@@surajdubey1047 the caliphate was having internal rebellions therefore the full force and focus was not on india had it khalid ibn al walid he could have not left an inch on india unconquered rather he would have penetrated far east to china and not even they could stand against him
@@sohail7728 okay this is a little too much
@@surajdubey1047 no you didn't. The Muslims successfully annexed modern day Pakistan, which was the core region of the Indus civilization. The rest of india was irrelevant and not civilized. Moreover, a few number of Muslims conquered and ruled over india for 1000 years. indians are extremely weak against foreigners
The Iberian campaign of the Umayyad have always overshadowed the story of the Sind conquest. Thank you for telling an important chapter of Muslim's early expansion to India.
Invasion into India
I have uploaded a video about Nader Shah and hindu romance. ,
This was not your bhart mata. This is the history of sindhu . historical and real sindhu only consists of sindh punjab kashmir Balochistan Afgania and some micro area of rajsthan kutch area is also included in sindhu
The only thing the followers of the religion of peace seem to be doing since the days of muhammad is jihad. They love military expansion & conquests yet cry & moan about western imperialism
@@knossostellel-amarna8502 Jihad is not the same as imperialism.
*Peaceful Hindu Muslim discussion coming*
Thanks for the heads up, Anushirawan
About as peaceful as the battles discussed in this video.
As a Sindhi I will say that this video is very accurate and unbiased about our land. Amazing work, looking forward to more of these.
I love when people from regions covered in a K&G video post. Usually to say that the information is correct!
It honestly happens a lot. I'm glad the channel gets so much right and can show the history of so many places. 😎👍
@ᗩTTᖇI ДΓΓЯI Are you talking about Aloro jo Chach? (Chach of Aloro) or his brother Chandar?
@@apexnext
Indeed, I am happy that he covered my state because Sindhi history is very rich but rarely gets light shed upon.
@ᗩTTᖇI ДΓΓЯI
I have read about him. He helped expand Sindh into Balochi territory and Siraiki (Baloch-Punjabi) lands.
He made Sindh a power house which showed power of Sindhis people.
Later on Sindh was also somewhat of a power state under Talpurs.
@ᗩTTᖇI ДΓΓЯI islamic radicalism killed them
Battle of Rajasthan 738 AD : Emir Junaid vs Hindu Alliance of Bappa Rawal + Dantidurga + Nagabhatta This was the most decisive victory that prevented Islamic Conquest into India for 500 years untile Battle of Tarain in 1192.
Muslims ruled over india for 1000 years. In the 16th century, only 9000 Afghans from the Sur Empire ruled over approximately 30 million indians
@@akiogood4712 Yes the Delhi Sultanate began in 1206 and lasted till 1526. It was followed by Mughal Empire from 1526 to 1757. But I am talking about 8th Century not 15th. 738 was the first official invasion into India which was repelled by an Alliance of Indian Kings.
@@akiogood4712 And yes the Suri Empire even though Short lived ruled over millions of Indians. (Even though the concept of India as a unified Country did not exist at that time)
@@Storifiedyt the first Muslim Invasion was not repelled. The Muslims successfully annexed modern day Pakistan, which was the core region of the Indus civilization.
@@akiogood4712 that's just not even remotely true, Muslim rule in India lasted for about 500 years and not all of India was under Muslim rule at one time, for example southern India was ruled by Hindu kings mostly
I love the increase in production and quality I am very greatful that this is all for free thank you and all the people who worked on these series from the bottom of my heart also will you continue the Hannibal series?
I also miss the Hannibal Barca series. Please bring it back.
@@lamaranajallow9127 but there is no series for Hannibal at all .. i hope they start it very soon.
wrong channel pal, the hannibal series is from the HistoryMarche channel not this one
@@williamrobert9898 No wonder the production and quality is so high na fr lmao jk my bad
@@Rizvi-rk1xy All good bro 🙌🏻
Indian and Chinese-like civilisations additions to Bannerlord would be interesting.
mods
Already has historical Chinese mods, but not sure if they have English language adaptions
@No Boxing No Life till the mongols came and took control, u goofy
@No Boxing No Life Mongol fárt loves your nose
@No Boxing No Life lmfao. The very concept of religion was given to china by India. It was an indian hindu brahmin convert buddhist who created kung fu
The Hindu Emperor of Sindh Dahir fought valiantly like a mammoth himself but it was his men who drifted in the middle of the war and his elephant which got wounded caused his fall. He almost won the war yet lost it eventually.
Dahir to this day is remembered as the last Hindu King of Sindh.
Imagine the last Sindhi Hindu King lived till 712 AD
@@ssjgogeta1979 last Hindu king in Afghanistan lived in 11th century.
@ⲰⲜϪ ⲮⲀⲖⲘⲞⲤ Hahaha....Changing Religion is not a Act of Valour😆😆, King Dahir Fought Bravely with his Arab Counterparts 😆😆
@ⲰⲜϪ ⲮⲀⲖⲘⲞⲤ Hahaha😆😆😆..... Yes to Quit Sati & put Halala😆😆😆
@ⲰⲜϪ ⲮⲀⲖⲘⲞⲤ Hahaha.....Halala with Sasur ji z Cool😆😆😆
I love to see how the caliphate army evolved.. the started to use heavy armor for cavalry and infantry and they use advanced tactics like the Romans and the Persians
They just realize that despite almost fanatical belief that fueled their desire for conquest they can still be skewered by a spear even if they are on horseback..
@@ashapuhin9825 Every warrior has to have strong faith and strong will to fight.. fighting is spiritual before it comes physicall you must have a strong heart and mind to defeat your enemy.. the Arabs just realized they they just can't relay on tribal warriors all the time they have to have a professional standing army that is ready to fight at all times.. the tribal element is still present and largely successful throughout all Islamic armies
Which caliphate? The Rashiduns started with light Calvary, the Ummayyad moved to heavy Calvary.
@@madeachanneljustcauseican3968 yes that what I meant
@@madeachanneljustcauseican3968 he spoke of them generalized, the caliphate generally refers to 4 nations: the rashidun, umayyads, abbasids, and ottomans.
There are more or less depending on who you ask, a shia would count the fatamids and maybe would not recognize the umayyads as a caliphate for killing the prophet (SAW)'s grandson.
Raja of Dahir's body was then decapitated and his head was sent to the governor of Basra, Al-Hajjaj ibn Yusuf. It was beyond brutal .
Raja dahir was pious man na ?? Cmonn seriously ‘ what he did to muslim womens ? Every single muslim hate hajjaj bin yusuf he killed thousands of muslims ! But hajaj jaisa zaalim insan bhi raja dahir ki harqat ki wjah se gairat khaa geya jab woh ladki ne akar bataya k raja dahir or uske cronies ne kya salook kiya traders or hajj travellers k saath ‘ mostly logon ko kidnap krke prison mei daala ‘ or womens k sath jo harqtein ki ‘ hajaj jaisa zaalim bhi ronay laggya or promise kiya apne ap se k dahir ko sabak sikhaunga pehla group bheja failed withdraw dusra group bheja pushed back failed ! Jab naye group ko bhejne laga toh ruler ne mana kardia k tune already treasury ko itna nuksan pahunchaya ab nahi hajaj ne request ki or promise kiya k jitna mai kharcha krunga usse 10x jydaa wapis krungaa ‘ hajaj ne firr apnee bhateeje qasim ko bheja ‘ he succeeded and killed raja dahir nd sent his head back to hajaj ! Toh one sided story na bataya kro poori story bataya kro k raja dahir bhi lower chracter ka ruler tha
Well, Thats the standard practice in those times.. Even among Non Muslims.
I wouldn't hate them for that, I would hate them for how they treated the women and children, They were all sold into slavery.
They even enslaved and sold the women of Sindh in Arab markets
8:26 Expeditions in Sindh (against the Chacha dynasty)
11:37 Expedition under Muhammad ibn Qasim
O Chacha it's not Chacha dynasty
@@ShahanshahShahin who cares its pakistani history
OH MY GOD, THEY ACTUALLY DID IT.
THANK YOU SO MUCH K&G.
A BLESSING FROM THE LORD.
The best and most detailed explanation of the fall of Sindh till date. Your narration style and accompanying graphics are very good. Thank you for the video.
17 years old boys today sitting on their pc playing fortnite .
17 years old men before 1400 years conquering kingdoms and empires .
Big difference.
*30* years old boys today sitting on their pc playing fortnite .
*FTFY
If you love war so much why don't u go fight in it
Because people, to an extent have the sense to know that wars bring no good. Sitting in front of a pc and playing games is not a very productive thing, but it's a million times better than going around killing people in the name of your pride. But do you have the mental clarity to understand this?
@@fireheart775 i don't mean, you should take ur weapon and go fight people, i mean that men before took their responsibilities more serious than men today.
17 years old today dont inherit armies from their fathers and arent trained in warfare.
i do so love the way these storys are put together.. and explained in detail
Love to my arab brothers from india if you don't know today's sinario than understand that today's sindh state was under Caliphate ans today's punjab in Pakistan and in India is under hindu and budhhist king's
I love these vids the quality is insane however when is the next vid coming on this series
on al andalus conquest?
Person working on it took a vacation, we are working on the next episode
It baffles me how muslims once ruled portugal spain and india at once.
Capitalism has weaken us
Not Muslims , it was Arabs.
@@Aragon-d who were hindu i presume? Or jewish or maybe even coptic christians?
@@Aragon-dArabs are Muslim
@@Aragon-doh racist ..it's ur religion teaches u to divide on the basis of race and cast ...Islam gave us statement"no any Arab is superior than any non Arab and vice versa😂😂😂
Great video boss please go into detail the conquests of transoxiana by qutayba even later on with The turgesh and tang wars
That’s gonna be a while I think because they’re doing the conquest of Spain and then after that the siege of Constantinople and then right after that they have to probably go all the way to covering the Abbasid revolution properly with his battle such as the river Zab in order to get to the battle of Tyler‘s which I’m sure they will do I can’t wait I love the Abbasid Revolution video but I want to see everything in full detail not to mention the famous battle of tours with Charles the hammer Martel the seventh century had never mind the eighth century had so many incredible battles let’s all enjoy them
@@sidp5381 too be honest they will need another season by this rate because the battles will intensify in many fronts
How pity, hindu kingdom lost to a mere 18 year old general Mohammad bin Kasim
And now Muslims cry victim over Hindus ruling them :D
The Ummah is enslaved by America, China, and India, while being abused by countries like Burma and Sri Lanka :)
@@silentstorm718
No one cries in India other than the Hindus who claim injustice and say that Muslims killed their ancestors and I forgot the Hindus in Pakistan, Bangladesh and Kashmir 😭😭😭 cry too
@@حٌفِّيِّدِأّلَفِّاروِقِ-خ8ص That's why Muslims cry on the global stage about Kashmir and supposed impending gen0cide in India. Our brothers in Burma handled the situation well and the Ummah cries about it but is powerless against our Dharmic unity.
India doesn't need your pity 😂
Hey dhair defeated arabs 6 times before
Can’t wait for next episode make it a long one!
It is a unique occurance in history that a 17 year old undertakes and leads such campaign thousands of kilometers away from his home.
He was 17, not 19
No. alexander the great was 20 when he started his campaigns, which were far more successful. and like other young conquerers and military leaders it was only possible because of the civil and military infrastructure that their predecessors laid down as well as their numerous advisors.
Read about Sahpur II Arab campaign at the age of 16
You do not distinguish between Qutayba bin Muslim and Muhammad al-Qasim Qutaiba, who is the young boy
@@aryaa7069 You do not distinguish between Qutayba bin Muslim and Muhammad al-Qasim Qutaiba, who is the young boy
I find it interesting how many Arab Conquest battles were multiple days.
Im from Karachi , Sindh , Pakistan which is near the Ancient Port of Debal where the Battle was fought !
Thank you for covering the history of our region, would love to see the 1857 Rebellion next !
Ur brother from Lahore here ;)
It was not a rebellion(as British calls that)
pls don't say that , it was first battle of freedom aazadi from the peoples of that soil.
Love from ur neighbor 🇮🇳
But sad as they were your last ancestors who were hindus..
Raja Dahir and his warriors who were your ancestors fought valiantly to defend your Prophets kin againsts the murderous Mir Qasim.
Today instead of hailing Raja Dahir u sing Kaseedahs for Mir Qasim an Arab
@@jaibholenath6900 ye purra pak hi madrasha hi se padhe hai to kya bola jai.
Ye gajni ko bhi apna allah mante hai jabki wahi enki metii me khoon massacre kiye tha🤦
Excellent can’t wait to see the famous battle of Guadalete however I hope you guys also cover in the next video how the famous Arab commander Muhammad Ibn al Qassim died shortly after his conquest of the sindh kingdom after caliph Suleiman came to the throne
The killing of Muhammad bin Al-Qasim / Qutaiba bin Muslim / Abdulaziz bin Musa + his father and Tariq bin Ziyad were removed at the hands of Suleiman bin Abdul-Malik، You need a special episode after completing the conquests in the time of Al-Waleed bin Abdul-Malik
@@ناصر-خ9ر These guys are already going to do their Arab conquests of Spain I think they’ll cover that as well because one of the more important individuals mentioned in this video all Hajaj there’s an important pivotal character I’m sure they will be covering their and I know that Solomon definitely was involved in their debts because he didn’t like al Hajaj
Actually Musliims did a favor to hiinduus in SOUTH ASIA when they arrived. .. It was only way for Muslims to make hinnduus civilised. otherwise hiinduus in lndia would still be cannibaIs & accustomed to eat each others deceased & decomposed fIesh till todate. Muslim did good job & hiinduus in modern day lndia( There was no lndia before 15th August 1947). Hindus in India should be grateful to their Muslims massterrs to show Iindus the ray of light & make Iiindus quit cannibaIism. Thank You!!😁
@@ناصر-خ9ر musa and tariq were removed by the dying Walid bin Abdul Malik himself. As for qutayba and Mohammed bin qasim they were part of entourage of hajjaj and he wanted to remove sulayman from the line of succession because of walids choice
@@MohamedMohamed-ws7mq
Note in my reply that I differentiated between the case of Musa bin Naseer, the case of Qutaiba and Muhammad bin Al-Qasim, but Al-Waleed summoned Musa only, but Suleiman was the real isolator and the elimination of the family after the killing of Abdulaziz
6:56 The Battle of Bekind is the largest battle in the Umayyad history, where they faced the sogdia and the Turks on the banks of the river
As an Arab I'm surprised that Indians are still getting butthurt about this conquest after over 1000 years! You do realize there was no international laws, united nations or even a real sovereign countries back then don't you?? It was the time of empires! You win some and you lose some.
We also lost to Mongols later in 1258 when Baghdad was sieged and hundreds of thousands of Muslims (Mainly Arabs) were killed but you don't see us here trying to fabricate history....
Indians aren't angry because of you, Arabs. They have been much troubled by the converted! They have split Pakistan into two in 1971 but problems still remain and they'll be sorted out sooner or later. With your nations, India has excellent relations. Cheers!
@@ranjittyagi9354 and Britishers were our chacha buajis for letting us distribute our home into segments of religion.
Be wise and humble in your observation on religious history, then you'll know what's fake and what's wane.
@@ranjittyagi9354 and also pakistan wasnt splited twas always india.
Indians aren't angry with Arabs, but with filth that followed afterwards. Read what muslim invasion brought to the subcontinent
@@raghav5903 it brought people to consciousness , they stopped worshipping phallus in name of culture and holding ancestors bs faith of worshipping pokeomns like ganesjha and hanuman , the pagan culture of kamkhya and khajurao is nothing to boast on just a blot on human history the immoral and illogical pagan tradition nowadays called hinduism is a collection of all kind of worship done in subcontinnet , myths are being told a shistory , ancient comics like ramayana and mahabharat are taughtaas history by h!ndus nowadatyys , aryans were truly master of making natives fool , there is a reason greek god and indian god have so nuch similarity , u guys were fooled and forcefully converted by aryans to worship phallus and pokemon
Can you make a video on 'Kabul shahan' kingdom of Kabul who stood against Arab expansion for over 250 years? Yaqub Leith al Safar invaded Kabul after a betrayal of the king ended up killing him in a peace negotiation.
Kabul was a tributary state and sometimes broke it then became again so that’s how they avoided conquest.
Abdurahman bin samara conquered the city in the 660s then abandoned it
@@MohamedMohamed-ws7mq tributary to whom??
See👇
*Arab* *siege* *of* *Kabul* *(665)*
Umayyed victory
The last Hindu king of Sindh Raja Dahir give a speech before going into the war
His words were ,
" Idefeated them 3 in battle . In 4th battle If I am able to defeat them successfully the roots of my Kingdom & Empire gets more strengthen . But , If I got martyred then I'll be happy because My nation will remember me as a person who give his life for the protection for his Country , Motherland & Hindu Faith " .
It's a shame for us that we majority of the people of India doesn't even know his name .
The Hindus have been humiliated and we have demolished your God made of stones 😂
@@x_oj Don't Worry We Demolished Your Pride By Defeating the Arabic Islam .
We keep them at Bay for 500 years . Read Your own history written by your historians .
@@x_oj Siege of Baghdad by Hulagu Khan.
Sack of Mecca by Abu Tahir Al Jannabi 😻🫵
@@Oskar_Von_Reuenthal_1
سيف الدين قطز
محمود الغزنوي
الحجاج بن يوسف الثقفي
محمد بن القاسم الثقفي ...
@@x_oj well look at india now and look at you
Looking forward the documentary on the battles of Tour (732), Akroinon (740) and Talas (751).
Talas is not a part of the early Muslim expansion era
@Reef Mohammed Sorry brother , could you rephrase that? Can't really get what you're asking me.
A video on Talas was made a long time ago
Mental how at this point of time, a massive empire ruled, while little Mercia was tiny.
Can't wait for Maslama ibn Abdul Malik in the future. Great video as always 👍👍
Bappa Rawal allied with other Indian Powers didn't let Umayaad to advance more in India ,after almost 400 years Turks conquered most of India under the banner of Islam
@@indiafirst3676 By Turks he probably meant the Ghaznavids, and Turkic dynasties of the Delhi Sultanate. The sultanate conquered most of India by the time of Muhammad Bin Tughluq, who had mixed Indian & Turkic origins.
@@indiafirst3676 Yeah.
Not a single Ummayad army was sent to attack India after Muhammad bin Qasim So against whom did you defend for 400 years ?
@@kingmaker2603"battle of navsari" sums it up all
@@indiafirst3676Tughlaq was Turks bro. ..do not associate that madman with us indians ..
He ain't Aryan .indians are indo - Aryan and Dravidian , with some north eastern tibeto - mongoloid population and minority of indo - scythian ancestry thrown in
Muhammad bin Qasim is considered a person of great importance in the history of Pakistan. To this day we hold great respect for his conquest of Sindh. However, Raja Dahir is also considered a national hero among other nationalists for his bravery against invaders. This makes it a complicated and rhetorical topic. Thank you for bringing up this usually ignored topic of our history. The conquest of Sindh holds great significance in the history of the modern-day Islamic republic of Pakistan as it would form the basis for the spread of Islam in the sub-continent and the further incursions of subsequent Muslim Empires in this region.
Raja Dahir is considered hero because he fought and gave his life against invaders but Muhammad Bin Qasim is also viewed good because he spread Islam.
The umayyad dynasty was the most brutal and cruel dynasties in the history of this world. They even slaughtered the family of Prophet Muhammad.
“Pakistan” did not exist back then..
@@smooky12 Pakistanis don't care about that. They don't care that their ancestors (Hindus, Buddhists and Jains of Indic Civilization living in the Indus Valley) were slaughtered and humiliated and went through massive cultural and economic degradation. They don't care that these invaders destroyed their own cities, temples, universities, libraries etc. Rather, they celebrate the massacres and destruction and glorify the invaders, all because they spread Islam.
@@smooky12 True, and arabian scholars say that if the rashidun Chalifate existed little more longer the slavery in the arabian Peninsula would end!
cant wait for the video on Tariq Ibn Ziyad!
@kingsandgenerals please
Please make a video on Nagabhatta 1 who defeated umayad caliphate army in battle near kannauj and also battle of Rajasthan where rajput confederacy leader bappa rawal of mewar defeated umayad caliphate and pushed them out of indian sub continent
🤣🤣🤣
@@حٌفِّيِّدِأّلَفِّاروِقِ-خ8ص why are you laughing aren't the facts stated above makes you jealous
@@Artist12467
What was the name of the Battle do you have a link
@@حٌفِّيِّدِأّلَفِّاروِقِ-خ8ص Well it was no a single battle . They fought for two decades.
The creator only wants to make pro muslim videos for India
Nice topic I really liked your video and see all Muslims battles
I am from Sindh
Hey guys iam Sindhi from Sindh province of Pakistan 🇵🇰
Türkiye de tarih üzerine böyle videolar çeken bir kimse görmedim sizi tebrik ediyorum
It's Indian history ☠️
@@randomclips5540he didnt say it is not 😊 he said i didnt see chanels like this talking about turkic history
Jihadis are frustrated they converted Turks, Egypt, persia but failed to convert India.
India is currently the third country with the most Muslims in the world...
look again India , Bangladesh,Pakistan -> 60 crore Muslims
@@rahmanibrothers1017 Talwar ke daar se salwar pahan lene walon ki koi izzat aur imaan nahi ho sakta. Look the condition of Afghanistan, Pakistan and now kangaladesh. Beggers can't be choosers.
@@Narrator_of_Tarikh07 yess bcoz your ancestors gave their daughters to invaders bcoz of fear. That's why you people always struggle for prosperity.
@@Aragon-dThe Rajput rulers ? Yeah, they gave their daughters to the Mughal emperors...
Muhammad bin Qasim was a young Umayyad general who is often credited with leading the Islamic conquest of Sindh (modern-day Pakistan) in the early 8th century.
Muhammad bin Qasim was sent to the Indian subcontinent by the Umayyad Caliphate after a plea for help from a woman named Daharsiah or Daharsia, who was captured and dishonored by the local ruler, Raja Dahir of Sindh. The woman reportedly sent a message to the Caliph, asking for help to avenge her honor. In response, the Caliph dispatched Muhammad bin Qasim, who then led a military campaign that resulted in the defeat of Raja Dahir and the annexation of Sindh into the Umayyad Caliphate.
This legend has become a part of popular Islamic folklore, symbolizing the protection of honor and justice for women.
Muhammad bin Harith is one of my ancestors. I am an Alawite Arab 🇸🇦
🤮🤢
you mean the adopted son of the prophet??
@@Valiantdisc No, this is Muhammad bin Al-Harith, this is a military leader from the Arabian Peninsula, which is now called Saudi Arabia.
@@خليلالعلوي-ق2ط thanks for explaining 🫡
@@خليلالعلوي-ق2ط sry my mistake adopted son of prophet saw is zayd ibn harith got confused
At last an episode with india in it. What about arab invasions into Chalukya dynasty and Gujjar-Pratihara dynasty?
Gurjaras defeated them well
It's interesting to see how the unstoppable tide of islam constantly came through the north western Indian region
The indians from earlier were much stronger than the ones that fought and lost to the turks, Afghans and mongols
@@maddogbasil man you Have to see about those Cultural Values too... In Our Culture we can't attack backstabbed which was Deep Rooted in Indian Kingdom traditions,and excessively Moralty.. even some Indian Kingdom also helped Turks To destroy other Indian Kingdom as They Signed treaty and Those shit Kingdom values them alot
@@thewarriorfrog i think chalukyas defeated the Arabs first followed by Gujjar-pratihara.
@@thewarriorfrog i think chalukyas defeated the Arabs first followed by Gujjar-pratihara.
This channel has taught me so much
The Jats of Kikan fought the Arabs for 20 years, successfully crushing them and remaining unconquerable permanently until the Turkic invasions (even then being extremely difficult to fight). Bappa Rawal united the Rajputs and drove back the Arabs to the Iranian plateau, hereby ending in climactic Indian victory over the Muslims.
Yeh konsi ongi pongi history hai
@@aowkahaniyaasunie5356 arabs ne hi likha hai 😂😂
History Nahi story hai correct it😂
@@qazikasam1395 allah bhi eak story ha mera kutte ka name allah ha😂
@@aowkahaniyaasunie5356 jo apke arbi mante hai, woh aap converted saab nahi manoge
I'm so exiticed to see next video of Alexander's campaign especially battle of hydaspes
Buzail ibn tahfa is killed and his death is celebrated , The sindhis proceed to get defeated by 17 years old Muhammad bin Qasim
I'm dieing to see the next episode cause as a Spaniard it always made me curious how could they manage to conquer the peninsula so quickly with so few troops. Im waiting impatiently to have my prejudices wronged and explained.
As someone who studied north african history a lot, the reasons are simple.
The conquerors were not all arabs and muslims, the vast majority of them were Berbers and Latins from north africa, most of them were newly recruits and religious zeolotry was not born yet, few years ago they followed arianism ( branch of christianity the promotes the humanity of christ and many believe it is what later developed into Islam ) like many iberians, they also spoke African Latin and it is the reason why spaniards today confuse v with b. It is an African Latin trait, because the Latin there got mixed with Punic from the days of Carthage, Punic like arabic and hebrew tend to mix the sounds v and b.
So we have conquerors that share almost the same religion, the same language and have a long history with Iberia, no wonder the native did not feel estranged by these aliens and some even joined them gainst the visigoth from northern europe.
As oppose to the rather northafricanized narrative, that denies the fact that the Visigoth had largely latinize by this point and thru admixture fused with the native hispanoroman population after centhuries since the visigoths had entered Hispania as clients of the Roman state, the inhabitants of Iberia had little in common with the incresingly arabized and islamicized northafrican population, true as it might be that in the urban regions of NA the romance speaking tongues endured for a time, that latin identity would eventually fade away through cultural assimilation to arab muslim society. As for linguistic affinity iberoromace had native influences distinct from the numidian/punic influences in northwestern afroromance languages.
Hispanoroman society was at this point predomenantely Catholic, Arrianism was largely a gothic phenomena and with the conversion of the visigothic crown to Catholicism the elite had folded to the latin Church.
One does not need to resort to fancifull arguments of "cultural affinity" to explain a conquest, afterall the Huns did not rely on cultural affinity for the conquest of roman territory neither did nomadic mongols had much in common with the vast settle chinese population they ruled upon, the fact is that a rapid conquest by a mobile and effectively lead army on horseback is a common ocurrence in preindustrial history, aided by co-option of local elites, political fragmentation of opponents and in some instances diseases/natural disasters.
Neither Pizarro nor Cortez had anything in common with the natives they commanded or conquered, it took a mixture of pragmatism, cunning, audacity and viciousness as in all major conquests, such was the case of the moorish capture of much of Iberia.
@@mza3764 لاتكذب على نفسك لايوجد اي لاتيني او غيره كلهم عرب
@@sahm-i5k
ساكذب الادريسي و ابن خلدون من عاشوا في ذلك الزمن و سأكذب كل المؤرخين لاصدق التخاريف التي تؤمن به انت.
@@mza3764 الادريسي وابن خلدون ولدو بعد فتح الاندلس ياكذاب وجب لي مؤرخ واحد فقط يقول ان الجيش كان اغلبه من اللاتينين والبربر يادجال
Alhamdulillah for Islam. Freeing lower caste Indians like me from a racist and cruel caste system.
islam has much caste any religion on this plant earth. Are you sunni or shia? or ahemdi ? if you are indian, then who are barelvi ? deboabndi ? who? mohammed himseld said only 1 sect will go to jannat rest all will go to jhanum
@@CelebrityPromoters-p5ithose are denominations not castes you cow lover lmao
@@CelebrityPromoters-p5iThose are denominations, not castes. There is no caste system in Islam.
@@El-Dorado930 Then why mohammed said only 1 firkah will go to Janah? rest all 72 will go to jhanum
@@CelebrityPromoters-p5i He was stressing the point of unity. There is virtually no system in Islam that says one group of humans is superior to another simply on the basis of birth. That is Hinduism.
Best tag line yet for a Keeps ad.
As a Pakistani,I wish my fellow Pakistanis luck in the comment section war with India that will soon begin.
🤣🤣
It did already 😂
hey! awesome video, found it extremely informative and helpful. Could you please provide the sources with which you researched the topic? I am facing some crisis at finding authentic resources to read about qasim's invasion on sindh.
I have uploaded a video about Nader Shah and hindu romance,
it is probably, Chachanama.
The Ummayyad Caliphate fought the Gujjar-Pratihara dynasty, which was in much of India during this time. The conflict most likely broke out over a desire to control the Indus River, which has always been an important trade route.😊
May Allah's mercy be upon Muhammad ibn Qasim from Bangladesh. What a great commander! 🇧🇩❤️☪️
Great commander did massacre of women , children and temples? Should we do the same to Muslims?
Also he was only 17 years old when he conquered India
@@Dripxxl-i4k totally different from today's life of 17yearold
@@DD-ky9xi source: trust mythology
@@onso9898 our mythology is many 1000 years older than your Islam.
Also I'm taking about WRITTEN RECORDS of the conquest by Arabs themselves.
And it will happen again. And this time Muslims will bear the brunt .
7:32
Theodora of Kazararia: "Did you get the throne back?"
Justinian II: "Yes"
Theodora of Khazaria: "What did it cost you?"
Justinian II: "My nose..." *Begins to cry*
Theodora of Kazaria: "Don't worry, honey. Now, you truly look like a real Emperador... especially to their busts" 😉
Justinian II: 🖕
Your comments are always hilarious.
21:03 Wow that was probably the most epic way to end a battle
Dahir was a proper madlad he just got unlucky with the loyalty of his subjects and army. Look up his succession story to the throne of Sindh.
LMAO That hindu just gave up 😂😂😂
@@suparpawarindaioksaar3951
😂😂😂😂😂
First Arab Invasion Of Sindh By Land Routed In Kikan
The third ‘pious’ Caliph who succeeded Umar was Usman ibn Affan (644-656 A.D.). Usman wanted to conquer Sindh and made up his mind to dispatch an expedition to invade Sindh. He appointed Abdullah to Iraq and commanded him to send an agent to gather information about Hind and Sindh. Abdullah deputed Hakim to go and acquire the desired information and upon his return, Hakim reported to the Caliph that, “Its water is dark; its fruit is bitter and poisonous; its land is stony and its earth is selfish. A small army will soon be annihilated there and a large army will soon die of hunger.” [The Chachnama: Volume 1 (1900), P 59 - Translated from Persian by Mirza Kalichbeg Fredunbeg] Hearing such a dismal report from Hakim, Caliph Usman abandoned his plan to attack Hind and Sindh.
It was during the reign of the fourth Caliph, Ali ibn Abi Talib (656-661 A.D.) who was also the last of the Rashidun Caliphs, that the first invasion of Sindh by land was carried out in 660 A.D. A great expedition, which included many nobles and chiefs, and which was led by Haras, proceeded towards the mountainous region of Kikan or Kikanan unhindered. The state of Kikan was located in the mountainous region in the northern part of present day Balochistan near the Bolan Pass and is mentioned by Hieun Tsang as a region of pastoral people and great mountains and valleys. As the Arab army proceeded, they managed to overpower some of the towns on their way to Kikan, securing “many slaves and a large booty, until they arrived at the mountain Kikanan. Here the natives stood up to fight with them.” [The Chachnama: Volume 1 (1900), P 59 - Translated from Persian by Mirza Kalichbeg Fredunbeg]
Kikan was part of the central division of the kingdom of Sindh which was under the direct administration of the king, Raja Chach Rai and was inhabited by the hardy Jats and Meds. The brave Jats and Meds of Kikan put up a tough fight against the Arabian invaders and decisively repulsed the attack. The invading Arab army incurred severe losses and “he (Haras) and those who were with him, saving a few, were slain in the land of Kikan in the year 42 A.H. (662 A.D.).” [The History Of India As Told By Its Historians: Vol. 1 - The Muhammadan Period, P 116 - Elliot And Dawson] The four ‘pious’ Rashidun Caliphs thus died with their dream of victory over Hind and Sind remaining unfulfilled.
Six Arab Raids Of Kikan And The Brave Defence By Jats And Meds
After the rout of the Arabian army in Kikan in 662 A.D., the region became the chief target of Arab military crusades. The succeeding Caliph Muawiyah I (661-680 A.D.) rebelled against Ali ibn Abi Talib and after his death, wrested power from Ali’s son Hasan and established the Umayyad Caliphate. Although a major part of Muawiyah’s political expansionism was focused on the Byzantine provinces, he nevertheless sent six determined expeditions to conquer the frontier post of Kikan in Sindh over a period of twenty years. None of the expeditions, except the last succeeded and the Arabs failed to make any lasting impact in the region.
During all the six raids, there was great slaughter as the locals Jats and Meds fought fiercely to defend their land and repulsed the Arab armies. Caliph Muawiyah despatched Abdullah ibn Sawad to conquer the kingdom of Sindh, appointing him as the governor and chief administrator of Sindh. Muawiyah said to Abdullah, “In the country of Sind, there is a mountain, which is called Kikanan. There are big and beautiful horses to be found there… The people are very cunning, and, under the shelter of that mountain, have become refractory and rebellious.” [The Chachnama: Volume 1 (1900), P 60 - Translated from Persian by Mirza Kalichbeg Fredunbeg]
Abdullah proceeded to attack Kikan with a large contingent of 4000 Arab warriors. When they arrived in Kikan, Abdullah and his army were assaulted by the brave Jat and Med soldiers of the provincial chief and fierce battle took place between the two armies. The local people of Kikan also came out in large numbers to fight the marauders. They occupied the mountain passes and the battle raged furiously. Abdullah’s troops were defeated by the valiant and fearless army of Kikan and eventually the army of Islamic Arabs was made to flee to Makran as, “the whole mountainous region became alive with fighting men and the Mussulmans beat a hasty retreat.” [The Chachnama: Volume 1 (1900), P 61 - Translated from Persian by Mirza Kalichbeg Fredunbeg] In 664 A.D. another Arab expedition led by Muhallab ibn Abu Safra advanced upto Banna and Alahwar between Multan and Kabul and proceeded southwards to Kikan but was trounced by the Meds and Muhallab and his men were annihilated. [The History Of India As Told By Its Historians: Vol. 1 - The Muhammadan Period, P 116 - Elliot And Dawson]
Upon Muawiyah’s command, Ziyad ibn Abu Sufian, who was the governor of Iraq, appointed Sinan ibn Salamah for the conquest of Sindh. Sinan made his troops take an oath to divorce their wives to keep them from fleeing [Kitab Futuh Al Buldan: Vol. 2, P 211 - Al Baladhuri Tr. By Francis Clark Murgotten] and was able to subdue the Meds and conquer Makran partially in 668 A.D. He established a small garrison in Makran. Ziyad then sent Rashid ibn Amr for the conquest of Kikan but Rashid was slain in a fierce battle with the Meds. Thereafter, Ziyad ibn Abu Sufian appointed Sinan ibn Salamah as the commander of the Arab army for further raids into the frontier provinces of Sindh. Although Sinan had conquered parts of Makran, the local Meds rebelled and only after the raid of Al Bahilli ibn Al Harri, who was sent by Ubaidullah ibn Ziyad, that Makran could finally be conquered by the Arabs in 680 A.D. after a fierce campaign. [Kitab Futuh Al Buldan: Vol. 2, P 212-213 - Al Baladhuri Tr. By Francis Clark Murgotten]
There was a period of relative calm in Sindh after 680 A.D. as the Arabs did not dare attack Sindh again for 28 years. They had suffered huge losses and all their invasions barring the last had failed and even that victory was no more than a small foothold in Makran. After a persistent effort of nearly half a century, the world conquering Arabs had failed to make any impact in the frontier provinces of Sindh.
We wouldn't have this video today, if those ships sailing from Srilanka reached arabian peninsula unharmed.
Your ancestors wouldn't have had to convert in that case. But who knows, some other event could've occurred?
@@ranjittyagi9354 why are you fighting over the fact about the fact that we converted?
If you read the process of convertion you'll know that the sect which became muslim (in Indian subcontinent) was the same who weren't sanatani or Jain or Buddhist, they didn't just adhered a faith out of spite, they thought thoroughly.
(Just read it on wiki or some non-polarising book)
If it makes you feel any better, in school days, i came 4th in a Hanuman Chalisa reciting competition, and tht didn't made me less of a Muslim or Indian.
@@antarakmit4114 first thing thank you for respecting lord hanuman
2d thing bhai thumi hi socho mughal invaders and others raped our women we don't hate you bro you are converted or may not but other ppl are abusing our gods on that day I was very angry on muslims may be your allah told that non Muslims not to come to mecca but still he even told that not to hate other gods hope you understood ❤️🙏
It's a myth
The Arabs clashed with Tibetans? Thats a story id love to hear more about!
no
Well not Arabs but Delhi sultanate and mughal empire but they got beaten due to harsh terrain
Always such great quality 👍
My favorite channel!! You guys are awesome thank you for your superb content
*A "Total War: CALIPH" would be fascinating.
It would
And in true Total War fashion, you have to conquer everything in 4 turns, or you loose.
@@Zacharoni4085 wouldnt wanna buy it if it was anything more ;)
Wow what a general Muhammad bin Kasim is 😊
He is my hero
Ofcource , a terrorist loves another terrorist 🙂
@@rohit-ru5nm a barbarian support another barbarian
You bloody Brahmin
@@rohit-ru5nm I hope now you are not killing or raping any Dalit or lower cast
I am just hoping
My hero too
Quid e Adam once said Muhammad bin quasimodo was the first pakistani
A seventeen-year-old boy who conquered India and Sindh and defeated its kings one after the other is a beautiful thing 😊🏴🏴🏴☝️
Actually he was 16 years old
@@mdladdan0786then f**ucked badly by pulkeshan 2 😂😂😂
Conquered india??? 😂
bro dont let these dummy hindus try to demotivate us islam was successfully integrated into indian subcontienent, look how many muslims exist today because of the efforts of all our predecessors who converted from hinduism and became muslim
Defeating small kingdom isn't big feat thou.
Hoping to continue the series and show us the reality and factual and tell us how Qasim conquest conceded till Sindh only and the defeats in the hands of Bappa Rawal, Nagabhatta and Vikramaditya II of Early India...
And why did there was no Muslim conquests in Indian subcontinent for next 3 centuries...
Yes but this channel mainly focusses on glorifying Islamic conquests and pleasing Muslim audience they are very selective in approach so they will never tell about it in their videos.
Please read the holy Quran in English or Hindi translation, insha Allah you can download install it in Hindi English translation insha Allah.
@@mtf_savage_beasts2565 They are telling history not glorifying. Our history is glorious, Muslims conquered most of the world and were rulers of the world for centuries. Total domination with small but disciplined army.
Your triggering at history will not change anything. Hindu stayed limited to India and Nepal.
They were too busy with cows and killing each other in name of caste.
@@mtf_savage_beasts2565 17:00 he did gave reason why Muslims did not invade further. Plus they were happy with getting tributes from Indian rulers so why bother.
@@blackpanthar906 Hindus were not limited to Nepal or India, Hindus were in Philippines, Malaysia, Indonesia, Even in Azerbaijan, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Thailand, Myanmar, Sri Lanka etc. You do know this conquest of ummayad caliphate ended in Failure because "Bappa Rawal" Defeated Ummayad caliphate expansion from Pakistan till Afghanistan.
But but.... hindus won every single war in bollywood movies
1971😁
@Zen2K4R No you fool, Arabs lost the battles of Rajasthan. Quit reading madrasa history.
@zen2k4r56 pov when you graduate from Ohio University 💀
@@Wareditz19 I don't think he knows the meaning of graduate ,💀💀
@@silentstorm718
The battles of Rajasthan 🤣🤣🤣 These are just small raids, idiot, not even battles, because the Umayyad state was engaged in other battles in Africa and Europe, but after a while the Ghaznavid state came and penetrated India and crushed the Hindus in Somanat and demolished the statue above your heads. Stop reading the false Hindu curricula. I think they are They did not mention to you that an Arab leader who was only 17 years old invaded India and brought the Hindus to their knees
🤣🤣🤣🔥👌
Awesome video!!!...I wished that the Caliphate would at least conquer up to Bengal. But oh well Bengal conquered until 12th century....
That's a weird thing to wish for
And how are muslamanas doing in bamgladrsh now?Do you eat with your dogs??
@@Spoonfeede would be better if you correct your grammar my friend XD
@@KingsRightHand In Pakistan, Afghanistan and specially our Persian cousins, we all mock Arabs. Be proud of your identity and learn from us how to keep the deseart rast in their limits.
First Arab Invasion Of India By Land Thwarted At Seistan
By 643 A.D. the Arab imperialists had captured Persia and the eastern borders of the Islamic Caliphate had reached the boundaries of Kabul and Zabul. The province of Seistan (Sijistan-Sakastan) on the west of river Helmand was part of the kingdom of Zabul and bordered Khorasan on the north-west. The capital of Seistan was Zarang or Zaranj near Lake Zarah and was governed by the Satrap of the king of Zabul. The kings of Zabul were called Rutbil or Zunbil. The overlord or king of the Satrap was “probably an officer of the line of Indian princes who ruled in the Kabul and Helmund valleys and were variously known to the Arabs as Rutbil, Rantbil and Zunbil.” [The Dynastic History Of Northern India - Vol. 1, P 65 - H. C. Ray] The king was also known as Ranbal, the most common title used by the local populace. For the benefit of the readers, we shall use the epithet ‘Zunbil’.
The third ‘pious’ Caliph, Usman (644-656 A.D.) was fired with a religious zeal like his predecessor Umar. He was determined to conquer Hind and Sindh for Islam and uproot idolatory. Under his command, the governor of Basra, Abdullah-ibn-Amir sent his general Ar-Rabi-ibn-Ziyad to conquer Seistan. The first Arab attack on Zabul was carried out by Ar-Rabi in Seistan in 650 A.D. The Arab army was met with fierce resistance by the army of Abarwiz, the Satrap, and suffered huge losses, but eventually managed to defeat the Satrap after a grim and prolonged battle. [Kitab Futuh Al Buldan: Vol. 2, P 142-143 - Al Baladhuri Tr. By Francis Clark Murgotten] Ar-Rabi penetrated deep into Zabul all the way up to Bust. However, he was soon routed and forced out of Seistan by the brave locals, thereby losing all the territories he had gained. [Indian Resistance To Early Muslim Invaders Upto 1206 A.D., P 39 - Dr. Ram Gopal Mishra]
Arab Attack On Zarang And Desecration Of Temple Of Zun
Abdullah-ibn-Amir was determined to conquer the frontier provinces of Al Hind. He appointed Abdur-Rehman-ibn-Samurah as governor of Seistan in 653 A.D. to conquer Seistan and Kabul. Abdur-Rehman advanced to Zarang, the capital of Seistan, with a large army and laid siege to the castle of the Satrap of Zarang. The Satrap’s army and the inhabitants of Zarang gave Abdur-Rehman a tough fight and a fierce battle followed. After a long and intense battle, the Satrap was defeated, and Abdur-Rehman extracted a heavy tribute from him. Abdur-Rehman captured the city of Zarang and the territories surrounding it.
Within a year, the Arab general Abdur-Rehman advanced to the province of Zamindawar with a large army. There was a temple devoted to the Hindu mountain god Zun, believed to be a mountain version of Lord Shiva on top of a sacred mountain in Zamindawar to north of Kandahar. The Hindu god Zun was said to be “the northern mountain form of Shiva or ‘an adaptation of Shiva to a local god, introduced from India,’” [Al Hind: The Making Of The Indo Islamic World, Vol. 1 - Early Medieval India And The Expansion Of Islam - 7th-11th Centuries, P 118-119 - Andre Wink] and the temple of Zun was the most important pilgrimage site of the entire region. Abdur-Rehman surrounded the sacred mountain with the temple of Zun and subjugated the local people, levying a heavy tribute on them. However, his real purpose was iconoclasm, as he took perverse pleasure in desecrating the temple and disfiguring the golden idol of the Hindu god Zun with fanatical zeal. He “went into the temple of Zur (Zun), an idol of gold with two rubies for eyes, he cut off a hand and took out the rubies. Then he said to the Satrap, ‘keep the gold and gems. I only wanted to show that it had no power to harm or help.’” [Kitab Futuh Al Buldan: Vol. 2, P 144 - Al Baladhuri Tr. By Francis Clark Murgotten]
Abdur-Rehman had to withdraw from Seistan due to internal civil dissidence in the Caliphate of Usman, which resulted in the First Fitna or religious war of Islam and eventually led to the overthrowing of the Rashidun Caliphate and the establishment of the Umayyad Caliphate. Abdur-Rehman appointed Umair-ibn-Ahmar in his place to govern the conquered territories of Seistan. However, soon after Abdur-Rehman departed to Arabia, the local inhabitants of Zarang rejected the Arab Islamic rule. “Subsequently the people of Zaranj expelled Umair and closed the town” to the Arabs. [Kitab Futuh Al Buldan: Vol. 2, P 144 - Al Baladhuri Tr. By Francis Clark Murgotten]
Arabs invade Kabul And Zabulistan
Early on in his reign, the first Umayyad Caliph, Muawiyah (661-680 A.D.) appointed Abdur-Rehman-ibn-Samurah as governor of Seistan once again with the aim of conquering Kabul and Zabul. Led by Abdur Rehman, a large Arab army laid siege to Kabul. After a long siege extending over a month, the Arab army stormed Kabul and finally managed to take possession of Kabul. But “the king of Kabul made an appeal to the warriors of India and the Musalmans were driven out of Kabul. He recovered all other countries and advanced as far as Bust.” [The History Of India As Told By Its Own Historians, Vol. 2 - The Muhammadan Period, P 415 - Elliot And Dawson] The king of Kabul, however agreed to pay an annual tribute to keep the Arabs at bay but over time he withheld the tribute to the Arabs. From Kabul, the Arab invaders marched on to Zabul and after a fierce battle, managed to defeat the people and get a foothold in Zabul.
The success of Zabul was also shortlived for the Arabs. Soon afterwards, Abdur Rehman was called back to Basra. Upon his departure, the Satraps of Kabul and Zabul rejected Islam and drove out the Arab Muslims from their kingdoms. The succeeding Arab governor attempted to subdue the region but failed and eventually made a treaty with the Satraps for a stipulated amount of money. [The History And Culture Of The Indian People: Vol. 3 - The Classical Age, P 167 - R. C. Majumdar]
Revolt Of Kabul And Slaughter Of Arabs At Junzah
In 683 A.D. the people of Kabul revolted under the leadership of the Kabul Shahi king as “Kabul Shah assembled a force to oppose the Moslems and drove out all of them that were in Kabul.” [Kitab Futuh Al Buldan: Vol. 2, P 147 - Al Baladhuri Tr. By Francis Clark Murgotten] Yazid-ibn-Ziyad, the governor of Seistan rushed in with his Arab army to restrain the revolt but his attempt at retribution was crushed by the Kabul Shahi army at the Battle of Junzah and his army was completely routed. Yazid-ibn-Ziyad was killed in battle along with many other prominent warriors of Arab aristocracy and his army was slaughtered in large numbers. Those Arab soldiers who escaped slaughter managed to flee. [The History And Culture Of The Indian People: Vol. 3 - The Classical Age, P 168 - R. C. Majumdar]
Around the same time, the Zunbil or king of Zabul also declared war on the Arabs and drove them out of Seistan. The Zunbil captured the Arab general Abu Ubaida and held him hostage and the Arabs had to pay large a very large sum of money to procure the release of Abu Ubaida from the king of Zabul. Yet, in spite of his victory over the Arab army, the Zunbil was defeated and killed in battle in 685 A.D. by Umair-al-Mazini. Zunbil’s son, also titled Zunbil (or Ranbal) continued the war with the Arabs to defend Zabul.
Arab imperialists? the first caliphate was a purely religious movement and it was not about arab supremacy.
The umayyads had a racism problem but the rashidun didn't, many non-arabs made up the upper ranks of the followers of the Prophet (SAW).
The rashidun were the direct companions and original muslims, the later dynasties were more traditional empires.
You are right about King Dahir. But I request you to make a video on the aftermath of this battle and how Bappa Rawal took the revenge of King Dahir and defeated the Muslims.
So how long will it be for the next expisode about the Umayyad conquest of Hispania to come out? I've been waiting for that episode for like more than three years at least if my memory served me correctly.
They post a new episode of this series every 1-2 months
Greeks - Gone
Ancient Egypt - Gone
Roman - Gone
Mesopotamia - Gone
Aztec - Gone
Today no one recalls names of their Gods, No one prays for their ancients.
The same forces came to destroy Hindu Civilization but failed because our ancestors never gave up.
Eternal Bharata. ❤
If you won't accept Islam then someone from future generations will do. In the end Islam will prevail.
I will die but i will never accept islam @@yasirshahani2544
Ignorance is the base of India. So polytheistic will not leave India.
Many religion survived of many invasions from foreign invaders. Ancient Chinese Religion is still exist in China. Your hindu religion was nothing in those times. It was like praying everything which they seems or thought supernatural.
Many folk religious still exist what do you mean?
Indians/hindus , i have one question , qasim defeated dahir and conquered sindh which led the foundation of islam in subcontinent. This is a historical fact .
Ok why are you getting ao triggered and emotional? You have a very long history of empires in subcontinent, be proud of that ... Empire rise and fall , kings come and go ... This happens... Cope with it
I hope we get to hear more about Al-Hajjaj.
Now make a video about how qasim ordered the massacre of 200 million hindu residents of sindh and later defeated by glorious hindu king bappa rawal who went on to capture modern day egypt and israel where hindus and jewish people of brahman decent first met ❤
@@johanliebert3943 liar
@@johanliebert3943 thats obviously a lie, the entire world had around 200 million people, how could he kill most of the world population?
also its a foolish lie to say that the indians captured land outside of india at that time, egypt never left muslim hands until the age of colonialism.
Also israel was ruled by muslims as well, how could bappa meet a people who ruled nothing?
@@resentfuldragon outstanding reply bro , 200 million 🤣🤣
@@johanliebert3943 🤣🤣 , WhatsApp University se pass out
excellently designed video graphics👍
120 out of 100 👍👍 for the narration of historical events
Keep it up!
Now make a video about how qasim ordered the massacre of 200 million hindu residents of sindh and later defeated by glorious hindu king bappa rawal who went on to capture modern day egypt and israel where hindus and jewish people of brahman decent first met ❤
I have waiting só much for that incredible series continuation
Great Channel!
Make a vedio on bappa rawal
And Lalitadiya muktipida 🚩🕉️🇮🇳
🤣
Lalitaditya😂😂😂
Before this campaign pork Tikka Masala was readily available in India
😆😆😆😆
Yes dalits still catch pig in streets for that
Its Haram, they got Biryani after conquests
Note: Muhammad bin AlQassem the Umayyad general and the hero of this episode was just 17 years old when he start his conquest of Sindh
He was a villian who sold 20k women into brothels.
@@aapkefather1872
How much they cost?
@Ex Christian khus
If mohamed al qasim was still alive he would defeat them
Nd then he was murdered by his own people i don't like him but still what a poor fate
@@mrmap4875
Unfortunately, The other generals were jealous of his achievements when he was not over 20 years old,
and they stirred up rumors against him until they killed him.
If he lived until his 50s or 60s at least he would had conquered all of India
Cant wait for your doucmentary of this period, 22 September 717/99 AH - 4 February 720 CE/101 AH. Plz make a long detailed video. 2 to 5 hours
Mohammad bin Kashim on fire💥
Joke, he co nquered India in his dreams, he could only take Sindh, and Sindh was taken back by Indians in just 10 yrs, Rest of the Arab Invasions were royally de feated by Indians. That is why Arabs could not conq uer rest of India, Is lamic hallucinations and islamic supremacy has made you not accept real history. Sindh was never won in a fair fight, Arabs used slimy de ceit, lying and che ating to win against Indians because they knew Indians can't be de feated in a fair fight. So he was med iocre fight. Allah never blessed him, he blessed the Indians. So it's the Indians who were on fire not Qasim, even after so much che ating and de ceit Qasim lost Sindh to Indians and Indians took back Sindh in just 10 yrs😂. Qasim was a joke in reality. 😂
a paaakeeee or a kaangluu will obviously praise his Ar ab maa sters😂.
Yes he was litrealy after few year's after the sindh battle
Well, the Arabs did not achieve anything in India. They tried to invade India but the Arabs were defeated by the south Indian Chalukya Dynasty and the north Indian Pratihara Dynasty. This stopped the Arab expansion in the east
The Umayyad dynasty had very little interest in the East so anything that occurred in the Eastern frontier of the Caliphate could considered boarder skirmish es compared to their Western expansion.
Reply is sooo cope 😂
your copium with this comment so crazy lmao
@@cinema6444 well I Ain't Muslim and am a Christian. But I have read history books written about that time period and those attacks were mostly raids for booty and plunder and Muslims won those and took many plunders from Ujjain,Malabar, saurashtra(gujrat) and enslaved many inhabitants and returned.
And yes they were border skirmishes. Main focus of Ummayad Caliphate was on invading Azerbaijan which was Christian, Armenian Kingdom, Eastern Roman Empire(Byzantines) who were also Christians and ofcourse Al Andalus (Spain).
They were also occupied in naval war and also on land with Christians in Italy especially Sicily Island. This was because many skilled craftsmen lived in Christian kingdoms and conquering Christian kingdoms offered Greater revenue and money in long run than campaigning against Indian kingdoms which would give strain into their finances without any monetary profit in subjecting.
Who cares about india i bet you india is much easier than Persia or Roman Empire there is no comparison
It would be interesting to know how Pakistanis are taught this in their history? ( seriously no offence to anyone.)
It maybe that Islam brought light to your people, but also you cannot deny the hardships during the chaos of war.
@@debarghapaul866 Hello Paul, it depends on where you study. In Karachi (port city of Sindh) there is a different perspective while in interior there is more Sindh eccentric view.
Muhammad Bin Qasim is praised for him bringing Islam. But Raja Dahir is also seen as a hero for resisting invaders.
So we from Sindh have more view on this situation than other provinces.
The most awaited Video ever
Thank you Muslims of those time I'm proud to he Indian Muslim ☪🇮🇳😊
An African Abyssinian Muslim caliphate champion fighting in sindh. 20:30
You must also make a documentary on Battle of Rajasthan where Arabs were driven away by The Great Rajput leader Bappa Rawal who was ancestor of great Maharana Pratap along with Nagabhatta and Rashtrakutas particularly Avanijanashraya Pulakesin.. No one dared to attack 300 years after that battle..
Lol u defeated Arabs 😂😂😂😭 no one father can defeat arabs 😂😂😂
Lol you think the Arabs would be scared to attack the weak and dis unified Indian kings. The Umayyad state was unstable because of their racist policies and was later replaced by the Abbasid caliphate,who unlike the Umayyads, were not focused on territorial expansion but in the internal development of the Muslim world. Eventually India was also conquered ( Indus Valley already came under Muslim rule) by the succeeding Turks and afghans.
@@mohammadshamail7732 how did india resist islam for hundreds of years unlike persia and then rest then?
@@mohammadshamail7732 use ur brain, not emotions
DUMMY MYTHOLOGY
Thank you soo mch... Was waiting for a long long time to watch a package on this Topic ❤️ love it, i have discovered with new things Really Loves It.❤️
India, also known as Bharat, is the only nation on the planet that still has an 80% non-Muslim population despite being ruled by Muslims for 800 years. Hindu Rajput women committed Jauhar (self-immolation) to avoid capture and enslavement. Sikhs were a warrior class that fought bravely against Islamic expansion in India. The plight of religious minorities living under islamic regimes is a serious concern throughout history and today.
Armenia and Georgia? What about them?
So, Pakistan, Bangladesh, etc are what?
Also, they peacefully co-existed and British knew about their strength in harmony, so they cunningly brought us down to this..maniac infighting
@@shabnamkhan2943😂😂😂thanks for proving his point
@@shabnamkhan2943 they are your ancestors who got converted bcz they were gays
As a Bangladeshi, may Allah's mercy be upon Qasim. Because of him, we were introduced to Islam in a large scale. Alhamdulillah ❤️❤️❤️
Mashallah ❤️ love my Muslim brothers in Bengladeshi
Dhon Kha tora Amar Tui ar Tor Qasim 🐢 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Kus ommak 😂@@saurabhswarnakar6829
all of u are forcefully converted its make me laugh how all indian subcontinent muslim adore qasim like all your ancestor was forcefully converted and you all behave like u are from arab 😂
great video, had no idea of these epic battles
Raja Dahir Fought bravely.
But Muslims won because the Hindus never had a chance
@@JackDorsey10 As a Sindhi from Sindh. I consider Raja Dahir brave and loyal because he defended his motherland. No matter he was a hindu. I am muslim and still love him, for his loyalty.
@Unknown Mafia 💀🖕 Bat Umer ki nahi hai. Bat resources ki hai. Arab army k pas resources zyada the.
@Unknown Mafia 💀🖕 You are the first one who is praising the people who invaded us. I love my motherland and I will speak for my heroes. Because they belonged to this land where I am born.
@Unknown Mafia 💀🖕 Yes right bro.
May Allah grant Jannah to Muhhamed Bin Al-Qasim
Amen 🤲
@@حٌفِّيِّدِأّلَفِّاروِقِ-خ8صMuslims on
Muslim invasion of india,iran Egypt spain:-😆😆😆
Muslim on israel invasion of gaza:- 😢😢we are victim saar we are most peaceful community saar😭😭😭😭
@@Atheist-hy6xqyed
So you want jannat for a rapist? A killer?
❤
Yep another case of forced conversions through conquest
Maybe they shouldn't have raided Muslim merchants and pilgrims
Hindus should have not messed with Muslims then lol. Peaceful tanatani community 😂
@@humzanafees9348 how can they messed with the Muslims ?
When the Arabs were the ones to conquer the land spread it by the sword
I'm a Pakistani myself and I'm assuming you are too, you a disgrace to your ancestors
@@Wandererofpeace5175Muslims were there to save the women from Hindu men
@@Qasim-e6bI’m Pakistani too and I’m glad we converted. Islam is for sane and humane people.