2025 is going to be HUGE for War Thunder Naval!

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 ม.ค. 2025
  • #gaming #warthundergameplay #warthundernaval
    2025 is going to be huge for War Thunder Naval and interview with Viacheslav Bullanikov, GD of War Thunder gives us some hints about what's to come. With Yamato, Bismarck and other famous ships are confirmed, next year is going to be something huge.

ความคิดเห็น • 62

  • @ToddLawrence23
    @ToddLawrence23 หลายเดือนก่อน +29

    Bro still has hopes 😭💀⚰

    • @AventarYT
      @AventarYT  หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Those aren't hopes, just 50/50 dread and reluctantly watching good news because something's suspicious lol

  • @Armourd_ace
    @Armourd_ace หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    naval really isnt that bad I find it fun when I wanna relax playing this game.

    • @shadowderper8930
      @shadowderper8930 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      mf has never seen a scharnhorst on the enemy team in his life (spoiler: quit before you ever do)

    • @AventarYT
      @AventarYT  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Naval EC is still arguably the best mode to relax and have fun

    • @AventarYT
      @AventarYT  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @shadowderper8930 Maybe he is in a Scharnhorst, who knows? Or he plays EC (btw, Japanese 356mm and 410mm guns can do wonders on Scharnhorsts(

    • @MTF-EPSILON-11-5-NULL
      @MTF-EPSILON-11-5-NULL 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@shadowderper8930or at the lower brs the alaska

    • @MTF-EPSILON-11-5-NULL
      @MTF-EPSILON-11-5-NULL 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@AventarYTstill havent got to play one 😢

  • @newbmechanics5699
    @newbmechanics5699 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    this is going to be lit for the 3 players that still play it

    • @AventarYT
      @AventarYT  หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      It's not naval players that push Gaijin towards adding that stuff, just so you know.

    • @johnathanburke4872
      @johnathanburke4872 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@AventarYTpeople always bully us naval players

    • @AventarYT
      @AventarYT  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      At this point it's just a dead meme that people like to throw. I'm not bothered by it and neither should anyone. Everyone should play what they like and that's it

  • @MaticTheProto
    @MaticTheProto หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    11:09 there is no rock paper scissors, only increasingly large rocks

    • @AventarYT
      @AventarYT  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Fair enough, that's a better analogy than mine

    • @Bellator151
      @Bellator151 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      P2W = pay to wham!

  • @JeremyThomas-c6q
    @JeremyThomas-c6q หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I hope they add modern destroyers and frigates it’d be pretty cool to intercept and launch missiles since you can kinda already do it in air then the could add missile subs

    • @AventarYT
      @AventarYT  หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      It would be cool but if they were to come, they would need to be locked in a different mode, separate from older ships.

    • @Servo20007
      @Servo20007 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Definitely, in the mobile version of Naval, the up tier is extremely unbalanced. I'm talking WW2 battleships vs missile destroyers/ cruisers ​
      @AventarYT

  • @miksim494
    @miksim494 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I hope more people are going to start playing naval

    • @AventarYT
      @AventarYT  หลายเดือนก่อน

      I do hope for that influx of new players that will come when Gaijin carry on with what they said

    • @JasonisMando
      @JasonisMando 19 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@AventarYT i just started playing japan naval, really fun at 4.0 alr

  • @Orca19904
    @Orca19904 17 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Funny thing is some of the ships you mentioned like the Iowa, Bismarck, and Yamato are already present in the mobile game.

    • @AventarYT
      @AventarYT  17 วันที่ผ่านมา

      They are, but the games only share an engine and title, with two different developers working on them. Safe to say, they don't work together on new additions to the games.

  • @jussi8111
    @jussi8111 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    unless they rework all the maps, rebalance all the br and rework the aiming system to not be so dented i dont see any hope for naval to succeed

    • @AventarYT
      @AventarYT  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Map rework should be their priority. BR decompression is a nice thing, they'd just need to lock planes from certain brs to be allowed in battles. Aiming system works fine as of now it just needs a bit tweaking in terms of clarity.

  • @hoshinotshennya
    @hoshinotshennya หลายเดือนก่อน

    I am just hoping for better stronger waves and storms to reduce visibility

    • @AventarYT
      @AventarYT  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      That and night battles would be a very cool addition to the game. I wouldn't mind also seeing stuff like heavy snowfall with visual effects like snow covering ship decks.

  • @maci91Ek
    @maci91Ek หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Brakuje jakiś fajnych map muszą być duże 30km na 30km czy coś jest pełno bugów, można się przyzwyczaić celowania z czasem na pewno jest bardzo dużo do poprawy za nim będą dodawać nowe statki

    • @AventarYT
      @AventarYT  หลายเดือนก่อน

      No właśnie mapy to główny problem, tylko Gaijin nie chce się do niego przyznać, do tego dochodzą skopane pociski wolumetryczne i cała otoczka czyli dlaczego Scharnhorst działa lepiej niż realistycznie o wiele lepsze i potężniejsze okręty. Gracze chcą większych map, dlatego grają głównie w EC jak jest w weekendy. Ale wiadomo, Bismarck i reszta przyciągną graczy bardziej, niż rework map czy cokolwiek innego.

    • @maci91Ek
      @maci91Ek หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@AventarYT no dokładnie, Scharnhorst jest OP żadne obecnie statek w grze nie ma z nim szans 1v1 jest go bardzo ciężko zatopić działa 410 mm nie robią aż takiej różnicy. Z jednej strony twórcy chcieli żeby więcej osób grało w ten tryb a z drugiej nic z tym trybem nie robią jak są jakieś poprawi to marynarka jest zawsze na końcu

  • @rudatkatzn9171
    @rudatkatzn9171 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I am quite excited and afraid for Naval. I mean fuck yeah, Bismarck! But... If they really want to complete the TT, this also brings Iowa, H-39 Class, Yamato and similar to the debate. And for that I think we need at least 9.0 Naval. Which would be terrible with 9.0+ Planes

  • @daastronaut
    @daastronaut 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

    i reckon they could implement submarines and missile ships if they adjusted the tech tree, maybe im wrong but the naval trees should be more like the other tech trees with older vehicles at the lower ranks and more modern vehicles at higher ranks. i get it might be abit weird having destroyers fight battleships but idk. all i know is why do mobile players get missles and submarines but we dont?

    • @AventarYT
      @AventarYT  22 วันที่ผ่านมา

      The only tree that follows chonological order of older vehicles being at low rank is currently air tree. Ground have tanks and vehicles from 50s and 60s at low ranks fighting early war tanks. It's not weird with destroyers fighting battleships, it's the format of random battles that forces same type of ships clashing each other, you can see in EC that the format of every type going against every class works. Mobile is being developed by another studio, hence why they get stuff we don't. Gaijin already dismissed anti-ship missiles coming to the game, saying that they can't really implement them, meaning they already tried doing that and failed. Subs will come eventually, just maybe not this year, as they are confirmed being in developement.

    • @daastronaut
      @daastronaut 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@AventarYT ohhh yeah i forgot about the ground stuff, makes sense

  • @CloudEcho
    @CloudEcho หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    gaijin : not happening bud
    bud : HUGE CHANGES INCOMING!!! 14 MINUTES VIDEO!!!!

    • @AventarYT
      @AventarYT  หลายเดือนก่อน

      That's why those are big changes. Most of community didn't expect things like Yamato and Iowa arriving next year but they thought subs are coming for example. Gaijin subverting expectations is a huge change into predicting on what's to come.

  • @HamzaJaafar-u4o
    @HamzaJaafar-u4o หลายเดือนก่อน

    average warthunder naval fan tearing his hair out and frothing at the mouth at every gaijin announcement

  • @maci91Ek
    @maci91Ek หลายเดือนก่อน

    Dobrze mówisz po angielsku na pewno lepiej od mnie, oczywiście leci substancja czekam na nowe materiały

  • @Bero_ig
    @Bero_ig หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    i was intrested but i cant hear you through my monitor youre a little too silent

    • @AventarYT
      @AventarYT  หลายเดือนก่อน

      I'll turn the audio a bit more next video and for this one I can only suggest turning the volume up to max.

  • @retteip8276
    @retteip8276 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I need that RN Roma and Jean-Bart
    So i "need" to reach top tier in one ore more nations bcs of the WW2 big ships are coming becouse after that the tree´s will take way more time to grind then now
    Also, i don´t want to get ammoracked sniped by some coastal ship in my spawn
    Also, its also the fault of the community that naval is so unpopular becouse they sais it is weird and make memes about it

    • @AventarYT
      @AventarYT  หลายเดือนก่อน

      The ships are definitely going to be something to see, whether completely destroying the mode or being quite alright gameplay wise.

  • @matthewrajagukguk5406
    @matthewrajagukguk5406 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What is the best naval nation and what premium i buy to grind?

    • @AventarYT
      @AventarYT  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I'd say currently the best nation would be either Japan or Germany. For premiums I recommend Mikuma and Eugen if they are available

    • @matthewrajagukguk5406
      @matthewrajagukguk5406 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @ how about Yamashiro? Is it play able since this is the one get new year sale.

    • @AventarYT
      @AventarYT  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@matthewrajagukguk5406 I generally don't recommend premium battleships since the tech tree versions are the same or better than the premium counterpart, besides Marat. I'd rather grind battleships with premium cruiser and then use free RP from spading said battleships to research more of them.

    • @matthewrajagukguk5406
      @matthewrajagukguk5406 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @ thank you.

  • @thesoaringscepter4325
    @thesoaringscepter4325 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

    … we had a naval division?

  • @acesirr
    @acesirr หลายเดือนก่อน

    At this point I don't dread it anymore, the gamemode is fucked already how about they just stop fucking it and leave it fucked by adding all the ships. Every time something good happens they add something new to refuck it.

    • @AventarYT
      @AventarYT  หลายเดือนก่อน

      It is still salvagable, but apparently attracting new players with shiny big things is more important than reworking and rebalancing maps and game modes.

  • @shadowderper8930
    @shadowderper8930 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Maybe war thunder naval would have more players if you didnt have to cut off your balls to sell on the black market just so you could get that extra 10 rp to get the next criminally powercrept ship

    • @AventarYT
      @AventarYT  หลายเดือนก่อน

      To be honest, RP and SL gain is one of the better in the game, definitely way better than in ground battles. The powercreep is real but same can be said about any other modes besides air I guess (Not talking about 10.0 and above, the powercreep there is beyond measure)

  • @lastlotus5064
    @lastlotus5064 หลายเดือนก่อน

    i cant hear anything

    • @AventarYT
      @AventarYT  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Might be problem on your side since you're the only one that said such thing

  • @VonMed
    @VonMed หลายเดือนก่อน

    CW ships

    • @AventarYT
      @AventarYT  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Those I don't think will ever come

  • @Redmanticore
    @Redmanticore หลายเดือนก่อน

    somebody still plays war thunder naval?

    • @AventarYT
      @AventarYT  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      There's quite decent naval population

    • @kennethmasters9329
      @kennethmasters9329 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@AventarYTignore him he is "meme" guy there is always this comment or this type of comment when discussing Naval he is like a teenage girl saying something for the likes on the internet.

    • @AventarYT
      @AventarYT  หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@kennethmasters9329 Will do, thanks for the info 👍

  • @sebastianmcclung6570
    @sebastianmcclung6570 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It’s simple they need to make the Maps bigger and they need to quit doing the straight line objectives. They need to make way more bigger open maps for that type of gameplay in Germany is not overpowered as much as many people are saying Germany has overpowered on their ships, they have one modern battle And that’s it and then they have one modern cruise but Germany has nothing but red not the fucking French have a New York clap battleship which is from the fucking 30s the Russian the British. They have actual over one to pre-World War II battleships. United States has one and three World War II battleships. Germany has no actual battleshiplike they could add the Genesis class or the Kaiser class battleships that were before World War II and they haven’t even got World War III during World War II. Germany is under has been doing this shit on purpose. Germany needs actual good shit to balance out Bismarck next year.